# Federally Supported Projects and Programs for Wastewater, Drinking Water, and Water Supply Infrastructure

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AR46471

## Record

- **Collection:** Congressional research report
- **Document type:** Reports
- **Published:** August 12, 2026
- **Citation:** R46471

## Text

Federally Supported Projects and Programs
for Wastewater, Drinking Water, and Water
Supply Infrastructure
Updated August 12, 2026

Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R46471

SUMMARY

Federally Supported Projects and Programs for
Wastewater, Drinking Water, and Water
Supply Infrastructure
For decades, Congress has authorized, modified, and funded federal programs to help
communities address water supply and water infrastructure needs. Departments and agencies that
administer these assistance programs include the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD), and the Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA).

R46471
August 12, 2026
Jonathan L. Ramseur,
Coordinator
Specialist in Environmental
Policy

In general, Congress has utilized two approaches to authorization and funding: individual project authorization and program
authorization. Reclamation and USACE administer a number of individual projects pursuant to direct authorizations from
Congress. Other agencies administer programs with standing authorizations that establish funding eligibility criteria. As a
practical matter, individual project authorizations generally must be funded each year and provide no guarantee of predictable
assistance over time. Although the authorized programs are not guaranteed to receive annual appropriations, in recent years
Congress has generally provided some level of annual appropriations to the water infrastructure programs identified in this
report.
The federal agencies responsible for administering water-related projects and programs undertake these activities pursuant to
wide-ranging missions with varying scopes. For example, EPA’s authorities relate to protecting public health and the
environment, whereas HUD and EDA focus on community and economic development. Some agencies’ activities are
national in scope (e.g., USDA and EPA), while others are regionally focused (e.g., Reclamation’s programs and projects,
which are limited to the 17 “reclamation states” in the West). Some focus primarily on urban areas (HUD), whereas others
concentrate mainly on rural areas (USDA).
Federal funding for these programs and projects varies greatly and continues to compete with many other programs that are
supported by discretionary spending. Some of these programs have received supplemental appropriations, such as the funds
provided in the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58), the American Relief Act (P.L. 118-158),
and the FY2025 reconciliation act (P.L. 119-21). FY2026 appropriations highlights include

•

$746 million for capitalization grants to states under EPA’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF)
program, and $411 million for EPA’s Drinking Water SRF program; $893 million for wastewater
infrastructure, and $715 million for drinking water infrastructure through community project
funding/congressionally directed spending (IIJA provided an additional $2.6 billion for each SRF
program);

•
•

$3 billion for EPA’s Drinking Water SRF program for lead service line replacement and related activities;

•

$370 million for loan subsidies and grants for USDA’s rural water and waste disposal programs to, in part,
support $1 billion in loan authority for direct loans and guaranteed loans;

•

$3.3 billion for HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program (water and wastewater
projects are among many eligible uses);

•

$1.5 billion in supplemental funding (P.L. 118-158) for EDA disaster economic recovery efforts, which
may include, but are not limited to, water supply or wastewater projects;

•
•

$360 million for USACE environmental infrastructure projects; and

$72 million for subsidy costs for the EPA-administered Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act
(WIFIA) program, allowing the agency to provide credit assistance of about $6.5 billion;

$63 million for Reclamation water storage projects, $212 million for Reclamation rural water projects, and
$176 million for Reclamation’s Title XVI reclamation/recycling projects.

For FY2027, the Trump Administration’s discretionary budget request proposed to reduce or eliminate funding for a number
of water infrastructure programs identified in this report.
Congressional Research Service

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Department of the Interior ............................................................................................................. 12
Bureau of Reclamation ............................................................................................................ 12
“Traditional” Multipurpose Reclamation Projects ............................................................ 13
WIIN Act Water Storage Projects ..................................................................................... 15
Rural Water Supply Projects ............................................................................................. 17
Title XVI Projects ............................................................................................................. 18
Desalination Projects ........................................................................................................ 21
Department of Defense .................................................................................................................. 22
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Civil Works ........................................................... 22
USACE Civil Works Projects ........................................................................................... 22
USACE Assistance for Nonfederal Projects ..................................................................... 24
Storage of M&I Water at Multipurpose USACE Reservoirs ............................................ 25
Environmental Infrastructure Assistance .......................................................................... 27
Department of Agriculture ............................................................................................................. 29
Rural Utilities Service (Water and Waste Disposal Programs) ............................................... 29
Natural Resources Conservation Service ................................................................................ 31
Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations .................................................................... 32
Small Watershed Rehabilitation ........................................................................................ 34
Environmental Protection Agency ................................................................................................. 35
Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Program ................................................................. 35
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan Program ............................................................ 38
Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program ..................................................... 42
Other EPA Water Infrastructure Funding Programs ................................................................ 44
Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Grant Program ............................................................. 44
Technical Assistance for Rural, Small, and Tribal Wastewater Systems .......................... 45
Technical Assistance for Small, Rural, and Tribal Drinking Water Systems .................... 46
Small and Disadvantaged Communities Drinking Water Grant Program ......................... 47
Lead Reduction Projects Grant Program .......................................................................... 48
Small Water System Resilience and Sustainability Grant Program .................................. 49
Midsize and Large Drinking Water System Infrastructure Resilience and
Sustainability Program................................................................................................... 50
Department of Housing and Urban Development ......................................................................... 51
Community Development Block Grants ................................................................................. 51
CDBG Section 108 Loan Guarantees...................................................................................... 53
Department of Commerce ............................................................................................................. 55
Economic Development Administration Public Works Program ............................................ 55
Economic Development Administration Economic Adjustment Assistance Program ............ 58

Tables
Table 1. Wastewater, Drinking Water, and Water Supply Infrastructure: Federal Funding
for Projects and Programs ............................................................................................................ 3

Congressional Research Service

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Contacts
Author Information........................................................................................................................ 62

Congressional Research Service

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Introduction
This report provides background and funding information on water infrastructure projects,
including those involving wastewater and drinking water, and water supply projects traditionally
funded by the federal government. The report also discusses federal funding programs that
provide assistance to communities to support these types of projects and related, eligible
activities.
For decades, Congress has authorized, modified, and funded federal programs and projects to
help communities address water supply and water infrastructure needs. The approaches and
statutory frameworks supporting water infrastructure vary. For example, the Department of the
Interior (DOI) Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the Department of Defense’s U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) administer a number of individual projects that require direct,
individual project authorizations from Congress prior to being eligible to receive appropriations.1
Other agencies administer programs with standing authorizations that establish eligibility criteria
rather than identify specific projects. Although these authorized programs are not guaranteed to
receive annual appropriations, Congress has generally provided some level of annual
appropriations in recent years to the water infrastructure programs identified in this report.
Agencies administering such programs covered in this report include
•
•
•
•

the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and
the Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA).

In addition, the projects and programs differ due to the varied scopes and missions of the
implementing agencies. For example, the statutory requirements for EPA-administered programs
generally focus on protecting public health and the environment. The EDA and HUD programs
focus on economic and community development. Further, the scope of the specific programs and
authorized projects discussed in this report—while all address either water supply or wastewater
and drinking water infrastructure to some degree—differ in other respects. Some are national in
scope (e.g., USDA and EPA), while others are regionally focused (e.g., Reclamation’s programs
and projects). Some focus primarily on urban areas (HUD), whereas others concentrate mainly on
rural areas (USDA).
For each of the projects and programs discussed, this report describes their purposes, financing
mechanisms, eligibility requirements, recent funding, and statutory/regulatory authority. The
report does not address special projects and programs aimed specifically at assisting Indian tribes,
Alaska Native villages, colonias,2 or other regional programs, such as those associated
exclusively with the Appalachian region or U.S. territories.
This report focuses on programs that support drinking water and wastewater infrastructure
projects and also municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply projects and activities. This report
generally does not address water projects and programs for irrigation, flood control,
1 For Reclamation, this also includes some projects that must be submitted to, and approved by, Congress prior to

funding (but no direct authorization is required). Department of Defense is currently also using the secondary title
Department of War under Executive Order 14347 on “Restoring the United States Department of War,” dated
September 5, 2025, which President Trump signed on September 6, 2025.
2 Colonias are typically rural, unincorporated communities or housing developments near the U.S.-Mexico border that
lack some or all basic infrastructure, including plumbing and public water and sewer.

Congressional Research Service

1

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

hydroelectricity, and recreation. However, in some cases (noted below), a federal program or
agency (e.g., Reclamation and USDA) may primarily support one or more of these other
objectives while providing some support for M&I activities, even if only incidentally.
Other federal authorities (e.g., ones administered by Reclamation and USACE) may be available
to assist with the provision of emergency water and wastewater needs, such as improving access
to water supplies during a drought. Such authorities are generally not discussed in this report.3
Table 1 summarizes financial and other key elements of the projects and program activities
discussed in this report. As indicated in the table, the level and scope of federal funding for these
programs and projects varies greatly. Congressional funding for the water programs continues to
compete with many other federal programs supported by discretionary spending. Stakeholders
and others continue to call for increased funding for these programs.
As Table 1 indicates, the Administration’s FY2027 discretionary budget request proposed to
reduce or eliminate funding for a number of water infrastructure programs.4

3 These programs are not discussed further in this report except for the Emergency Community Water Assistance

Grants administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). For more information, see CRS Report R46911,
Drought in the United States: Science, Policy, and Selected Federal Authorities, coordinated by Charles V. Stern and
Eva Lipiec.
4 For more information on the difference between discretionary and mandatory spending, see CRS In Focus IF13124,
Distinguishing Between Discretionary and Mandatory Spending, by Megan S. Lynch.

Congressional Research Service

2

Table 1. Wastewater, Drinking Water, and Water Supply Infrastructure:
Federal Funding for Projects and Programs
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

DOI Bureau of
Reclamationa

Multipurpose projects,
which may include
some municipal and
industrial (M&I)
activities

De facto 40- to 50year loan

0%/100%, with
interest for M&I
uses

Not applicable

P.L. 119-74: $1.627
billion

DOI Bureau of
Reclamation Water
Infrastructure
Improvements for
the Nation (WIIN)
Act Water Storage
Projects

Multipurpose projects,
which may include
some M&I activities

Direct funding for the
federal share of costs,
with the reimbursable
share of these costs
subject to repayment
(i.e., de facto loans)

50%/50% for
federal projects;
25%/75% for
nonfederal
projects

Not applicable

P.L. 119-74: $62.5
million

—

DOI Bureau of
Reclamation (Title
XVI, P.L. 102-575)b

Wastewater
reclamation and reuse,c
which may include
some M&I activities

De facto grant

Up to 25%/75%;
dollar limits may
apply

Not readily available

P.L. 119-74: $13.0
million
IIJA: $160.6 million

—

DOI Bureau of
Reclamation Rural
Water Supplyd

Indian and non-Indian
rural water supply

De facto grant, plus
loan

Non-Indian
projects: range
from 75%/25% to
80%/20%; Indian
projects: 100%/0%

Not applicable

P.L. 119-74: $119.5
million
IIJA: $92.0 million

DOI Bureau of
Reclamation
Desalination Project
Construction

Brackish and seawater
desalination, which may
include some M&I
activities

Grant

Up to 25%/75%;
dollar limits may
apply

Not readily available

P.L. 119-74: $6.7 million
IIJA: $79.9 million

CRS-3

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

FY2027
President
Funding
Request
$1.275 billion

$31.3 million

—

Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

USACE
Multipurpose
Reservoirs with
Storage for M&I
Water

Reservoirs may provide
M&I water storage
through permanent or
temporary storage
agreements

Upfront federal
financing of reservoirs;
M&I storage is repaid
through fees collected
from nonfederal
entities

0%/100%, with
interest

Not applicable

$6.0 million

—

USACE
Environmental
Infrastructure
Assistance

Assistance is typically
for public drinking
water and wastewater
infrastructure and
source water
protection and
development

Technical/planning and
design services or
grants; design and
construction services
or grants

75%/25% generally;
some authorities
are 65%/35%

Varies (see report
text for details)

P.L. 119-74: $359.6
million

—

USDA Rural Utilities
Service (RUS),
Circuit Rider
Program

Technical assistance to
help those operating
rural water systems to
overcome day-to-day
management, financial,
and technical issues

Cooperative
agreement awarded to
the National Rural
Water Association to
provide technical
assistance to entities
that own and operate
rural water systems

100%/0%

Not applicable

P.L. 119-37, Division B:
$23.9 million

USDA RUS,
Emergency
Community Water
Assistance Grant
Program

Assistance to rural
communities to prepare
for, or recover from,
disasters that may affect
the availability of clean
drinking water

Grants to eligible
entities to help rural
communities facing a
major decline in water
quality or quantity

100%/0% (cost
share is
encouraged)

Up to $150,000 for
water transmission
line grants
Up $1.0 million for
water source grants

P.L. 119-37, Division B:
$7.0 million

CRS-4

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

FY2027
President
Funding
Request

$24.0 million

—

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

USDA RUS, Rural
Decentralized
Water Systems
Grant Program

Assistance for the
construction, service,
or refurbishment of
individually owned wells
and decentralized
wastewater systems
(typically septic tanks)

Grants to eligible
entities that provide
loans and subgrants to
homeowners for
projects

USDA RUS,
Revolving Funds for
Financing Water
and Wastewater
Projects Program

Assistance to eligible
entities create revolving
loan funds (i.e., loan
funds that are
replenished by loan
repayment). Loan funds
support rural water and
waste disposal projects.

USDA RUS, Water
and Waste Disposal
Loan and Grant
Program

USDA RUS, Water
and Waste Disposal
Loan Guarantee
Program

CRS-5

Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

FY2027
President
Funding
Request

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

Grants to eligible
entities: 90%/10%
Loans and
subgrants for
household
projects: 100%/0%

Loans up to $15,000
per household

P.L. 119-37, Division B:
$5.0 million

—

Grants to eligible
entities to set up
revolving funds to
provide loans for rural
community water and
wastewater projects

Grants for
revolving loan
funds: 80%/20%
Loans for rural
community
projects: 100%/0%

Loans up to $200,000
per borrower

P.L. 119-37, Division B:
$1.0 million

—

Assistance to acquire,
construct, or improve
rural drinking water,
storm water, and waste
disposal systems

Loans and grants to
eligible entities to
support projects in
rural communities

Loans: 100%/0%
Grants: Federal
share is variable
depending on
income of the
rural community

Not readily available

P.L. 119-37, Division B:
$47.6 loan subsidy (to
support $1.0 billion
loan authority); $140.0
million (competitive
grants); $110.5 million
(CPF/CDS)

$58.5 loan
subsidy (to
support $816.9
million loan
authority); $100.0
million
(competitive
grants); $0 for
CPF/CDS

Assistance to acquire,
construct, or improve
rural drinking water,
storm water, and waste
disposal systems

Loan guarantees to
eligible entities to
support projects in
rural communities

100%/0%

Not readily available

P.L. 119-37, Division B:
No loan subsidy needed
to support $50.0
million loan authority

No loan subsidy
needed to
support $50.0
million loan
authority

Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

FY2027
President
Funding
Request

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

USDA RUS, Water
and Waste Disposal
Technical Assistance
and Training
Program

Technical assistance to
rural communities to
identify and evaluate
solutions to water and
waste disposal issues,
and apply for loans and
grants

Grants to eligible
entities that provide
technical assistance

100%/0%

Not readily available

P.L. 119-37, Division B:
$35.0 million

—

USDA Watershed
and Flood
Prevention
Operations Program

Multiple activities,
including municipal or
industrial water supply,
but must generally
include flood control
measures

Project grants and
technical advisory
services

100%/0%
Varies according
to purpose of
improvement
activity

Not applicable

P.L. 119-21 and P.L.
119-37: $17.6 million
for grants and $32.4
million for CPF/CDS
(discretionary)
$150.0 million
(mandatory)

$0 (discretionary)
$150.0 million
(mandatory)

USDA Small
Watershed
Rehabilitation
Program

Dam rehabilitation

Project grants and
technical advisory
services

100%/0%
Varies according
to purpose of
improvement
activity

Not applicable

P.L. 119-37: $3.0 million

—

EPA, Clean Water
State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan
Program

Municipal wastewater
treatment, stormwater
infrastructure, and
other eligible projects
and activities

Grants to states to
capitalize loan funds
SRF loans made by
states to local project
sponsors
States required to
provide a minimum
level of additional
subsidization (e.g.,
principal forgiveness)
and authorized to
provide further
subsidization

80%/20% for
grants to states to
capitalize SRFs
0%/100%e (project
loans are repaid
100% to states)

Average capitalization
grant to states and
territories: $64.6
million (FY2026)f
Average assistance
from SRF to local
recipients: $5.2 million
(FY2023)g

P.L. 119-74: $746.1
million for capitalization
grants
$892.8 million
(CPF/CDS)

$155.0 million for
capitalization
grants

CRS-6

IIJA: $2.603 billion for
capitalization grants
$225.0 million for
emerging contaminants

Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

EPA, Drinking
Water SRF Loan
Program

Public water supply
projects needed to
meet federal drinking
water standards and to
address serious health
risks

Grants to states to
capitalize loan funds
SRF loans made by
states to local project
sponsors
States must provide a
minimum level of
additional
subsidization (e.g.,
principal forgiveness)
and may provide
further subsidization

80%/20% for
grants to states to
capitalize SRFs
0%/100%e (project
loans are repaid
100% to states)

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

Average capitalization
grant to states and
territories: $113.9
million (through
FY2026)h
Average assistance
from SRF to local
recipients: $4.1 million
(FY2025)

P.L. 119-74: $410.7
million for capitalization
grants
$715.4 million
(CPF/CDS)

FY2027
President
Funding
Request
$150.0 million for
capitalization
grants

IIJA: $2.603 billion for
capitalization grants
$3.0 billion for lead
service line (LSL)
replacement
$800.0 million for
emerging contaminants

EPA, Water
Infrastructure
Finance and
Innovation Act
(WIFIA) Program

Wastewater and
drinking water projects
with costs of $20.0
million or larger (or
$5.0 million for rural
areas)

Loans or loan
guarantees

In general, WIFIA
funding cannot
exceed 49% of
project costs

$155.0 million
(average of 154 closed
loans)i

P.L. 119-74: $72.3
million (including $7.6
million for
administrative
expenses)

$7.8 million for
administrative
expenses

EPA, Sewer
Overflow and
Stormwater Grant
Program

Sewer overflow or
stormwater
infrastructure projects,
with priority for
financially distressed
communities

Grants to states,
which make grants to
municipalities

55%/45%

Average allotment to
states and territories
in FY2026 was
$725,000j

P.L. 119-74: $41.0
million

$41.0 million

CRS-7

Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

EPA, Technical
Assistance for Rural,
Small, and Tribal
Wastewater
Systems

Assist rural, small, and
tribal publicly owned
treatment works and
decentralized
wastewater treatment
systems to comply with
the Clean Water Act
and apply for financing
from the Clean Water
SRF

Grants to qualified
nonprofits to provide
technical assistance

100%/0%

EPA awarded $49.0
million to 6
organizations in 2025k

P.L. 119-74: $25.5
million

EPA, Technical
Assistance for Rural,
Small, and Tribal
Drinking Water
Systems

Assist public water
systems and particularly
small systems (serving
25-10,000 customers)
with Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA)
compliance

Grants to qualified
nonprofits to provide
technical assistance

100%/0%

For FY2025, EPA
awarded an average
grant amount of $8.6
million to 3 entitiesl

P.L. 119-74: $26.0
million

—

EPA, Small and
Disadvantaged
Communities
Drinking Water
Grant Program

Drinking water projects
needed to meet federal
drinking water
standards, household
water quality testing,
assistance that benefits
a community on a perhousehold basis

Grants to states on
behalf of an
underserved
community, public
water systems, tribal
water systems

55%/45% for
grants (EPA may
waive match under
certain
circumstances)

Appropriations
distributed
noncompetitively to
states

P.L. 119-74: $28.5
million

$20 million

EPA, Lead
Reduction Projects
Grant Program

Drinking water projects
and activities to reduce
lead in drinking water;
replacement of LSLs;
corrosion control
activities

Grants to community
water systems, tribal
water systems, states,
schools, and
municipalities

80%/20% for
grants (EPA may
waive match under
certain
circumstances)

For FY2025, EPA
awarded an average of
$6.5 million to grant
recipientsm

P.L. 119-74: $22.0
million

CRS-8

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

FY2027
President
Funding
Request
$10.0 million

IIJA: $1.0 billion for
emerging contaminants

$20 million

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

EPA, Small Water
Systems Resilience
and Sustainability
Grant Program

Projects that increase
water use efficiency,
enhance water supply
through watershed
management or
desalination, and
increase energy
efficiency in the
conveyance or
treatment of drinking
water

Grants to community
water systems, tribal
water systems, states

EPA, Midsize and
Large Water
Systems Resilience
and Sustainability
Grant Program

Projects include water
conservation,
desalination
construction, and
watershed management
activities, among others

HUD, Community
Development Block
Grant Programp

Multipurpose
community
development projects;
may include water and
waste disposal

CRS-9

Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

FY2027
President
Funding
Request

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

90%/10% for
grants (EPA may
waive match under
certain
circumstances)

For FY2023, EPA
awarded an average of
$2.3 million to grant
recipientsn

P.L. 119-74: $6.5 million

$16.5 million

50% of grants for
water systems serving
10,000 or more to
100,000 individuals,
and 50% for systems
serving more than
100,000 individuals

100%/0%

No assistance
provided to dateo

P.L. 119-74: $2.3 million

$2.3 million

Formula grants, 70%
of which are reserved
for urban areas, 30%
for state grants

100%/0%

Entitlement formula
grants: $2.1 million;
average award to state
programs: $20.0
million (for subawards to
communities) in
FY2024

P.L. 119-75: $3.3 billion

—

Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share

Average Amount of
Assistance

FY2026 Enacted
Fundinga

FY2027
President
Funding
Request

Agency and Projects
or Program

Project/
Program Purposes

Type of Financial
Assistance

Commerce, EDA,
Economic
Adjustment
Assistance (EAA)q

Multipurpose economic
development projects;
may include water and
sewer

Project grants

Generally,
60%/40%

$650,000 (FY2025)

P.L. 119-74: Congress
directed EDA to
allocate $39.5 million to
EAA

The President’s
FY2027 budget
requested to
eliminate funding
for the EDA
programs and
requested $20
million for “an
orderly closeout
of EDA”r

Commerce, EDA,
Public Works

Multipurpose economic
development projects;
may include water and
sewer

Project grants

Generally,
60%/40%

$1.4 million (FY2025)

P.L. 119-74: Congress
directed EDA to
allocate $100.0 million
to Public Works

The President’s
FY2027 budget
requested to
eliminate funding
for the EDA
programs and
requested $20
million for “an
orderly closeout
of EDA”r

Source: CRS.
Notes: An em dash (—) indicates that the President did not make a funding request; IIJA = Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58); DOI = Department of
the Interior; USACE = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; HUD = Department of Housing and Urban Development; EDA = Economic Development Administration;
CPF/CDS = Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending.
a. In some cases, funding amounts may address other objectives within a given project or program.
b. These projects must generally be authorized by Congress prior to construction. Municipal water supply is not the primary purpose of these projects. IIJA funding for
Title XVI reflects all funding for these projects under that legislation, including both regular and “large-scale” projects.
c. Title XVI supports what is generally considered water reuse and reclamation. Reclamation is treatment of wastewater or other impaired surface water (e.g.,
seawater) or groundwater (e.g., groundwater with high levels of contaminants, such as arsenic or salts) to make it usable or reusable for nonpotable or indirect
potable use (e.g., potable use after storage and recovery, such as after groundwater recharge). Reuse connotes planned beneficial use (e.g., landscape watering,
agricultural irrigation, and industrial cooling) of treated municipal wastewater.
d. These projects must generally be authorized by Congress prior to construction.

CRS-10

e.

f.

g.

h.

i.
j.

k.
l.
m.
n.
o.
p.
q.
r.

CRS-11

This ratio does not account for additional subsidization. Under certain conditions, states may provide additional subsidization, including principal forgiveness,
negative interest loans, or a combination. In addition, appropriations acts in recent years have required states to use minimum percentages of their allotted funds to
provide additional subsidization, including grants.
This figure is based on FY2026 allotments to states and territories from the Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and
Environment Appropriations Act, 2026 (P.L. 119-74), and IIJA (P.L. 117-58). See U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Memorandum from Jessica Kramer to
Water Division Directors, “Fiscal Year 2026 Allotments for the State Revolving Fund Provisions of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Base Program
Funding,” April 14, 2026, Attachment I, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2026-04/fy-2026-joint-srf-allotments-memorandum.pdf.
This figure is based on FY2023 total dollars of annual assistance provided ($8.8 billion) and total number of assistance agreements (1,682) from the Clean Water
State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) National Information Management System, “National Report,” https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/clean-water-state-revolving-fund-cwsrfnational-information-management-system-reports. As of the date of this report, the data in the national report contain information through FY2023.
“Average annual capitalization grant” includes emergency supplemental appropriations provided by IIJA (P.L. 117-58) directed toward specific project purposes (e.g.,
lead service line replacement). EPA, “Annual Allotment of Federal Funds for States, Tribes, and Territories,” https://www.epa.gov/dwsrf/annual-allotment-federalfunds-states-tribes-and-territories.
EPA, “WIFIA Closed Loans,” as of July 8, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/wifia/wifia-closed-loans.
Memorandum from Raffael Stein, Director, EPA Water Infrastructure Division, to Regional Water Division Directors, “Allocation of Federal Fiscal Year 2025 &
2026 Funding for the Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Municipal Grant Program,” April 27, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2026-04/osgfy25-fy26-allocation-memo.pdf.
For more information, see EPA, “Training and Technical Assistance (TA) Program for Rural, Small, and Tribal Wastewater Systems,” https://www.epa.gov/small-andrural-wastewater-systems/training-and-technical-assistance-ta-program-rural-small-and.
For more information, see EPA, “Training and Technical Assistance to Improve Water Quality and Enable Small Public Water Systems to Provide Safe Drinking
Water,” https://www.epa.gov/dwcapacity/training-and-technical-assistance-improve-water-quality-and-enable-small-public-water-0.
EPA, “WIIN Grant: Reduction in Lead Exposure Via Drinking Water,” https://www.epa.gov/dwcapacity/wiin-grant-reducing-lead-drinking-water#recentfunding.
For more information, see EPA, “Drinking Water System Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability,” https://www.epa.gov/dwcapacity/drinking-water-systeminfrastructure-resilience-and-sustainability#funding2.
For more information, see EPA, “Midsize and Large Drinking Water System Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Program,” https://www.epa.gov/dwcapacity/
midsize-and-large-drinking-water-system-infrastructure-resilience-and-sustainability#available%20funding.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) figures in this table do not include Community Development Fund set-asides.
The totals for the EAA program do not include supplemental appropriations or annual appropriations directed to the Assistance to Indigenous Communities,
Assistance to Coal Communities (ACC), or other Assistance to Energy Communities initiatives.
OMB, Appendix—Budget of the U.S. Government FY2027, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/com_fy2027.pdf#page=4sd.

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Department of the Interior5
Bureau of Reclamation6
The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) was established to implement the Reclamation Act of
1902, which authorized the construction of water works to provide water for irrigation in arid and
semiarid western states.7 Reclamation owns and manages 491 dams and 296 reservoirs, which are
capable of storing 140 million acre-feet of water.8 These facilities serve approximately 10 million
acres of irrigated farmland and 31 million municipal and industrial (M&I) customers throughout
the West.
Historically, Reclamation primarily supports M&I water supplies as part of larger, multipurpose
federal reclamation projects serving irrigation, flood control, power supply, and recreation
purposes. However, it has constructed few such projects in recent years. Since 1980, Congress
has individually authorized construction of several “rural water supply” projects that have also
served these purposes. Further, since 1992 Congress has also authorized nonfederal participation
in reclamation wastewater and reuse/recycling projects. These projects, discussed below, are
known as Title XVI projects because they were first authorized in 1992 under Title XVI of P.L.
102-575.
Congress has in the past decade expanded Reclamation’s involvement in other types of
nonfederal water supply projects. In the 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation
Act (WIIN Act; P.L. 114-322), Congress added authority for Reclamation to support nonfederal
construction of brackish and seawater desalination projects and added new authority for
Reclamation to support water storage project construction (generally referred to here as “WIIN
Act water storage projects”) on a cost-shared basis, including construction of nonfederal water
storage projects. Each of these areas is discussed below. In P.L. 117-169 (popularly known as the
Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA), Congress appropriated $550.0 million for Reclamation to
provide up to 100% of the cost for water projects where the primary purpose is to provide
domestic water supplies to disadvantaged communities or households (see text box below).

5 This section was prepared by Charles V. Stern, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy, Resources, Science, and

Industry Division, and Anna E. Normand, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy in the Resources, Science, and
Industry Division.
6 For more information on Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) water supply authorities and activities, see CRS
Report R46303, Bureau of Reclamation: History, Authorities, and Issues for Congress, by Charles V. Stern and Anna
E. Normand.
7 Reclamation is generally authorized to construct projects only in the 17 western states (Arizona, California, Colorado,
Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas,
Utah, Washington, and Wyoming) unless otherwise directed by Congress. For example, in 1986, Congress authorized
Reclamation to also work in U.S. territories (P.L. 99-396), and Section 8501(1) of P.L. 116-9 authorized Reclamation
to provide grants for water efficiency improvements in Hawaii and Alaska, in addition to other authorized areas.
8 Bureau of Reclamation, “About Us – Fact Sheet,” accessed August 12, 2026, https://www.usbr.gov/main/about/
fact.html.

Congressional Research Service

12

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Bureau of Reclamation’s Disadvantaged Community
Domestic Water Supply Projects9
Section 50231 of P.L. 117-169, commonly referred to as the Inflation Reduction Act, appropriated $550.0 million,
available through FY2031, for the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) to provide up to 100% of the cost for the
planning, design, and/or construction of water projects where the primary purpose is to provide domestic water
supplies to disadvantaged communities or households in a Reclamation state or territory (43 U.S.C. §391). The
funding mechanism may be via grants, contracts, or financial assistance agreements at a cost share determined by
the Commissioner of Reclamation. Utilizing Section 50231, Reclamation reported that it had committed $222
million in funding for domestic water supply projects as of March 2026. This includes funding to assist tribes under
a new Tribal Domestic Water Supplies Program for tribes in Reclamation states, and a new Territorial Domestic
Water Supply Program for the U.S. territories of American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition, Reclamation has supported some eligible proposals for
WaterSMART Planning and Project Design Grants and WaterSMART Drought Resiliency Projects above the usual
50% federal cost share.

Historically, Reclamation constructed projects with federal funds, then established a repayment
schedule based on the amount of total construction costs allocated to specific project purposes.
Reclamation project authorizations typically require 100% repayment, with interest, for the M&I
portion of water supply facilities, which makes Reclamation assistance a de facto long-term
loan.10 A similar arrangement is required for the federal portion of WIIN Act water storage
projects. For M&I projects under rural water, Title XVI, desalination, and disadvantaged
community domestic water supply authorities, Congress has established terms providing some or
all federal funding for projects on a nonreimbursable basis.

“Traditional” Multipurpose Reclamation Projects11
Reclamation undertakes “traditional” reclamation projects (i.e., projects authorized under the
structure laid out in the Reclamation Act of 1902 and related laws) at the explicit direction of
Congress. Local project sponsors may approach Reclamation or Congress with proposals for
project construction and funding. However, except where blanket feasibility study authorizations
exist (e.g., certain program areas described below), specific project feasibility studies must first
be authorized by Congress.12 Once a feasibility study is completed, congressional authorization is
typically sought prior to a request for construction appropriations.13 Because there is no
9 The sources for this text box are Reclamation Reports on Inflation Reduction Act, July 11, 2025; Reclamation,

“Tribal Domestic Water Supplies Program,” https://www.usbr.gov/native/programs/DomesticWaterprogram.html;
Reclamation, Territorial Domestic Water Supply Projects Financial Assistance Request for Proposals, February 2026,
https://www.usbr.gov/international/DWSP/
RFP_Territorial%20Domestic%20Water%20Supplies%20Program_Phase%202.pdf; DOI, “Biden-Harris
Administration Delivers $147 Million from Investing in America Agenda for Drought Resiliency and Water Supply
Reliability Across the West,” May 6, 2024, https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/biden-harris-administration-delivers147-million-investing-america-agenda-drought.
10 Repayment obligations are typically spread over a 40- or 50-year repayment term. In contrast to municipal and
industrial (M&I) repayment, Reclamation-built irrigation facilities are generally repaid without interest over similar
time periods.
11 This section discusses “traditional” authority for Reclamation to construct water resources projects. Reclamation also
has a similar (but separate) authority to construct new surface water storage projects under Section 4007 of the Water
Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN Act; P.L. 114-322). For more information about how this
authority differs from Reclamation’s traditional construction authority, see CRS In Focus IF10626, Reclamation Water
Storage Projects: Section 4007 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act, by Charles V.
Stern.
12 See Section 8 of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72; 16 U.S.C. §460l-19).
13 Section 9(a) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (53 Stat. 1193; 43 U.S.C. §485h(a)) provides that, if the
(continued...)

Congressional Research Service

13

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

“program” per se, there are no general eligibility or program criteria for selecting large,
multipurpose projects. Rather, Congress relies on information provided in feasibility studies,
including cost-benefit, engineering, and environmental analyses and policy considerations. While
Reclamation maintains almost 200 of these projects throughout the country, it has constructed few
new reclamation projects in recent years.

Project Purposes
Individual authorization statutes establish project purposes. Generally, M&I projects are part of
larger, multipurpose projects such as those built for irrigation water supply, flood control, and
hydropower purposes.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Projects are financed and constructed up front by the federal government. Costs for M&I portions
of such projects are generally considered reimbursable to the government and are thus scheduled
to be repaid in full, with interest, over extended terms. Irrigation districts must also repay their
share of project benefits, but such payments are not subject to interest charges. Other water
supply costs, such as costs for fish and wildlife enhancement, are considered nonreimbursable
pursuant to federal law, and repayment is not required.

Eligibility Requirements
Generally, local governments and organizations, such as irrigation, water, or conservation
districts, may approach Reclamation and/or Congress for project support. All construction project
funding must be appropriated by Congress. As noted earlier, Reclamation works only on projects
located in the 17 western states (32 Stat. 388; 43 U.S.C. §§391 et seq.) unless otherwise
specifically authorized.

Recent Federal Funding
Funding information for the M&I portions of multipurpose reclamation projects is not readily
available. Total discretionary Reclamation appropriations (gross current authority for all
Reclamation projects and programs, not including permanent funding) for FY2026 were $1.63
billion.
For FY2027, the President requested $1.28 billion for Reclamation.14

Statutory and Regulatory Authority
Reclamation generally carries out its water supply activities in 17 western states as authorized by
the Reclamation Act of 1902, as amended (32 Stat. 388; 43 U.S.C. §§391 et seq.), as well as
through hundreds of individual project authorization statutes.

Secretary of the Interior finds that the allocable benefits of the project equal or outweigh anticipated costs, then the
project shall be deemed authorized. Even so, the Secretary of the Interior has first sought congressional approval for
large construction projects in recent decades. In any case, Congress would need to provide appropriations for any new
project construction.
14 These amounts include funding requests for Rural Water and Title XVI programs, discussed below.

Congressional Research Service

14

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

WIIN Act Water Storage Projects15
Congress enacted new authority for Reclamation to support surface and groundwater storage
projects (i.e., authority apart from the aforementioned “traditional” project authority) under
Section 4007 of the WIIN Act.16 Congress authorized $335.0 million in discretionary
appropriations for these projects and approved a different approach than the traditional
reclamation law process of federal project study and construction with full, up-front federal
funding for individual projects.
Funding for water storage projects under Section 4007 is available for two primary project types.
Federally owned storage projects (surface water storage projects to which the United States holds
title, and which were authorized to be constructed pursuant to reclamation law and regulations)
may be no more than 50% federally funded. State-led storage projects (surface water or
groundwater storage projects constructed, operated, and maintained by states or political
subdivisions) may be no more than 25% federally funded. Prior to the WIIN Act, Congress had
not authorized Reclamation to fund state-led water storage projects.
Before projects can receive federal support under the WIIN Act authority, several milestones must
be met. The Secretary of the Interior must find that the project is feasible and provides benefits
proportionate to the federal government’s cost share, and project sponsors must agree to pay their
portion of project costs up front. Appropriations under the Section 4007 authority are available to
individual projects only after the Secretary transmits a list of recommended projects and funding
levels to Congress and Congress designates those projects by name in an enacted appropriations
act.17
Any project that meets the aforementioned criteria is eligible for funding allocations by
Reclamation. However, Congress also stipulated that in order to move forward, the Secretary
must find projects feasible by January 1, 2021.18 As of May 2026, Reclamation had recommended
funding for 13 projects in three states; Reclamation also recommended 8 of these projects for
construction prior to the aforementioned WIIN Act deadline. These projects are eligible for
construction funding moving forward.

Project Purposes
Congress did not specify purposes for WIIN Act water storage projects, only that a project must
be feasible and have federal benefits “in accordance with the reclamation laws.”19 To date,
projects receiving funding under this authority are expected to provide benefits related to
agricultural irrigation and/or M&I uses, among other things.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Water storage projects determined by Reclamation to be eligible under Section 4007 of the WIIN
Act may receive direct, up-front federal funding in amounts recommended by Reclamation and
approved by Congress, subject to the WIIN Act’s authorized cost shares (i.e., 50% for federal
15 For more on this authority, see CRS In Focus IF10626, Reclamation Water Storage Projects: Section 4007 of the

Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act, by Charles V. Stern; and CRS Report R47987, Bureau
of Reclamation Support for Water Storage Projects, by Charles V. Stern.
16 43 U.S.C. §390b note.
17 For more information, see P.L. 114-322, §4007(a) and (b).
18 P.L. 114-322, §4007(i).
19 P.L. 114-322, §4007(b)(3)(A), §4007(c)(2)(B)(i).

Congressional Research Service

15

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

projects, 25% for nonfederal projects). Similar to the “traditional” multipurpose federal
reclamation projects discussed above, the federal share for WIIN Act storage projects is subject to
a cost allocation by Reclamation during the study process that determines which portions of the
federal cost share are reimbursable and nonreimbursable. Reimbursable costs, which include the
portions of benefits estimated to accrue to M&I agricultural water supplies, must be repaid by
project sponsors over a 40-year period (with interest for M&I water supply benefits, and without
interest for agricultural irrigation benefits). Nonreimbursable costs, such as water supplies for fish
and wildlife purposes and flood control, are considered federal benefits and do not have to be
repaid.

Eligibility Requirements
Eligible projects must be located in the 17 western states and territories authorized in reclamation
law and may include federal projects—projects to which the United States holds title and were
authorized and constructed pursuant to reclamation laws. “State-led” projects—projects
constructed, operated, and maintained by any state, department of a state, subdivision of a state,
or public agency organized pursuant to state law—are also eligible for funding under this
section.20

Recent Federal Funding
Similar to funding for traditional reclamation projects, there is no funding breakdown available
for the M&I portions of WIIN Act water storage projects. Congress included $62.5 million for
WIIN Act Section 4007 projects in P.L. 119-74.
The President requested no funding for these projects in the FY2026 budget request.
Apart from regular appropriations, Congress has also made supplemental appropriations for
Reclamation water storage projects, including Section 4007 projects. Congress appropriated
$1.05 billion for water storage projects from FY2022 to FY2026 in the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58), and Reclamation allocated $1.029 billion in funding for these
projects in FY2022-FY2026 IIJA spend plans.21 In the 119th Congress, the FY2025 reconciliation
law commonly known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21) appropriated another $1.0
billion for projects that would increase the capacity of existing Reclamation surface water storage
facilities, including Section 4007 projects. The Administration allocated $889 million in this
funding in 2026.22

Statutory and Regulatory Authority
Water storage projects are authorized under Subtitle J, Section 4007, of the WIIN Act (130 Stat.
1863-1866, 43 U.S.C. §390b note).

20 P.L. 114-322, §4007(a)(1)-(2).
21 FY2022-FY2025 Reclamation Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) spend plans are available at

https://www.usbr.gov/bil/2022-spendplan.html.
22 Reclamation, “Interior Announces $889 Million Investment in Western Water Infrastructure Through President
Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill,” press release, March 17, 2026, https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-announces889-million-investment-western-water-infrastructure-through.

Congressional Research Service

16

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Rural Water Supply Projects23
Similar to its traditional multipurpose projects, Reclamation has undertaken individual rural water
projects, largely at the explicit direction of Congress. In lieu of the project-based approach to
authorizing new rural water projects, Congress authorized a rural water supply program in the
Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006 (Title I of P.L. 109-451; 42 U.S.C. §§2401 et seq.).
Under the program, Reclamation was authorized to work with rural communities and Indian
tribes to identify M&I water needs and options to address such needs through appraisal
investigations and, in some cases, feasibility studies. In 2008, Reclamation published an interim
final rule establishing future program criteria.24 According to Reclamation, between 2006 and
2016, it used this authority to study approximately 22 projects to varying extents. It did not
recommend any projects for construction, as authorized by Congress. No projects have been
constructed under this authority, which expired at the end of FY2016 and has not been renewed.
Congress continues to provide funding for previously authorized rural water projects and those
authorized thereafter.25

Project Purposes
Individual authorization statutes have established rural water project purposes. Some rural water
project authorizations meet obligations under Indian water settlements or otherwise provide
benefits to Indian tribes.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Projects are generally cost-shared between the federal government and local sponsors. The federal
government pays up to 100% of the cost of Indian rural water supply projects, including operation
and maintenance, and the federal cost share for current nontribal projects ranges from 75% to
80%. Reclamation requests and distributes funding from Congress generally based on
prioritization criteria aimed to reflect both the priorities identified in the statutes that authorized
individual projects and the goals of the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006.

Eligibility Requirements
Local governments and organizations such as water and conservation districts or associations,
including tribes, may approach Reclamation and/or Congress for project support. Currently, all
construction project funding must be authorized at the project level and appropriated by
Congress. As noted earlier, Reclamation works only on projects located in the 17 western states
(32 Stat. 388; 43 U.S.C. §§391 et seq.) unless specifically authorized by Congress.
Reclamation previously published an interim final rule (43 C.F.R. Part 404) that established
criteria for developing new rural supply projects.26 However, the authority for the program has
23

See also CRS Report R46308, Bureau of Reclamation Rural Water Projects, by Anna E. Normand.

24 43 C.F.R. Part 404.
25 The Clean Water for Rural Communities Act (§1110 of Title XI of Division FF of P.L. 116-260) directed the

Secretary of the Interior to enter into a cooperative agreement to provide assistance at a 65% federal cost share for the
planning, design, and construction of the Musselshell-Judith Rural Water System and authorized appropriations at
$56.7 million subject to cost indexing for the 2014 cost estimate of the feasibility report. The act also authorized $5.0
million for reviewing the Dry-Redwater Regional Water Authority System submitted to Reclamation on September 1,
2010, and for completing any additional work to ensure the study complied with Reclamation’s feasibility standards.
Congress has appropriated funding for the Musselshell-Judith Rural Water System.
26 DOI, “Reclamation Rural Water Supply Program,” 73 Federal Register 67782, November 17, 2008,
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-26584.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

17

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

since expired, and Congress last authorized a project in 2009.27 The rule does not apply to
previously authorized or newly authorized projects. As previously stated, ongoing rural water
construction activities are limited to individually authorized projects.

Recent Federal Funding
For FY2026, the explanatory statement accompanying the Energy and Water Development and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 (Division B of P.L. 119-74) directed Water and
Related Resources Account appropriations for the following individual rural water projects:28
•
•
•
•

$17.5 million for the Mni Wiconi Project,
$14.3 million for rural water activities at the Garrison Diversion Unit,
$10.7 million for Eastern New Mexico Water Supply—Ute Reservoir, and
$2.0 million for the Mid-Dakota Rural Water Project.

The explanatory statement also directed $75.0 million for construction of rural water projects for
Reclamation to allocate in a spend plan. Reclamation allocated $50.0 million for the Eastern
North Dakota Alternate Water Supply project part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program and
$25.0 million for construction at the Eastern New Mexico Water Supply Project.29 Reclamation’s
IIJA spend plan indicates $92.0 million for FY2026.30
Therefore, the total FY2026 allocation for rural water supply projects is $211.5 million.
For FY2027, the President requested $31.3 million for tribal rural water O&M requirements at the
Mni Wiconi Project ($17.3 million) and Garrison Diversion Unit ($14 million).31

Statutory and Regulatory Authority
The Rural Water Supply Program was authorized by the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of
2006. This programmatic authority expired at the end of FY2016 and has not been renewed.
Construction and operations and maintenance are ongoing for several geographically specific
projects that were authorized under various individual acts.

Title XVI Projects
Title XVI of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-575)
directs the Secretary of the Interior to develop a program to “investigate and identify”
opportunities to reclaim and reuse wastewater and naturally impaired ground and surface water.
Water reclaimed via Title XVI projects is primarily used for M&I water supply (nonpotable and
27 DOI, “Reclamation Rural Water Supply Program,” 73 Federal Register 67778-67791, November 17, 2008,

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-26584.pdf. Under the rule, priority was given to domestic, residential, and
municipal uses. Communities or groups of communities with populations under 50,000 were also eligible. The use of
water for commercial irrigation purposes was not allowed.
28 Funding levels for operations of the Mni Wiconi Project, rural water activities at the Garrison Diversion Unit, and the
Mid-Dakota Rural Water Project were as requested in the President’s budget request. Funding for the Eastern New
Mexico Water Supply—Ute Reservoir was included as a congressional directed spending request.
29 Reclamation, Bureau of Reclamation FY 2026 Additional Funding Allocation Recommendations,
https://www.usbr.gov/budget/2026/FY-2026-BOR-Spend-Plan-Distribution-Additional-Funds.pdf.
30 Reclamation, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Annual Spend Plan 2026, https://www.usbr.gov/foia/
docs/bor-infrastructure-investment-jobs-act/archive/docs/spendplan-2026/FY-2026-Reclamation-BIL-Spend-Plan.pdf.
31 Reclamation, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2027, https://www.doi.gov/sites/
default/files/documents/2026-05/fy2027greenbookusbr.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

18

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

indirect potable purposes only). Other uses include irrigation supply, groundwater recharge, fish
and wildlife enhancement, and outdoor recreation.
The original Title XVI legislation authorized construction of five reclamation wastewater projects
and six wastewater and groundwater recycling/reclamation studies. The act has been amended on
multiple occasions, resulting in a total of 53 projects individually authorized for construction.
Amendments to Title XVI enacted in the WIIN Act made changes to the program, including
authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to accept and review nonfederal feasibility studies for
potential planning, design, and construction projects.32 The WIIN Act also authorized a
competitive grant program for construction of projects approved under this authority.33
In IIJA, Congress further amended the Title XVI authority and created a new category of “largescale” Title XVI projects, defined as projects with total costs in excess of $500.0 million.34 In
contrast to “regular” Title XVI projects (which are generally limited to the lesser of $20.0 million
or 25% federal cost share), projects under this section are entitled to a federal cost share of 25%
of project costs, with no dollar cap on federal support. As a result, Reclamation currently supports
three types of water reuse and recycling projects: congressionally authorized Title XVI projects;
WIIN Act Title XVI projects, and large-scale water reuse/recycling projects.

Project Purposes
The general purpose of Title XVI projects is to provide supplemental water supplies by
recycling/reusing agricultural drainage water, wastewater, brackish surface and groundwater, and
other sources of contaminated water. Projects may be permanent or for demonstration purposes.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Title XVI projects are funded through grants that are available only to authorized projects (i.e.,
projects with individual authorizations from Congress or approved by the Administration and
Congress pursuant to the WIIN Act). Title XVI project construction costs are shared by the
federal government and a local project sponsor or sponsors. The federal share is nonreimbursable
and is generally limited to the lesser of $20.0 million (1996 dollars) or 25% of total project
costs.35 The exception is large-scale water reuse and recycling projects funded pursuant to IIJA,
which are eligible to receive up to 25% of project costs, with no comparable cost cap.

Eligibility Requirements
Similar to other Reclamation activities, the Title XVI water reclamation and wastewater recycling
program is limited to projects and studies in the 17 western states, unless otherwise specified.36
Prior to enactment of the WIIN Act, Administration requests for construction funding had
generally been limited to individual congressionally authorized projects where (1) an appraisal
32 These guidelines were published in Reclamation, Reclamation Manual Directive and Standard WTR 11-01, February

8, 2017, https://www.usbr.gov/recman/wtr/wtr11-01.pdf.
33 While selection criteria for WIIN Act grants have generally been the same as those for “traditional” Reclamation
projects, the two groups of projects are typically allocated funding amounts separately by Congress, and Reclamation
solicits grant proposals for each category separately.
34 See Title IX, §40905 of P.L. 117-58.
35 The exceptions are individually authorized projects where Congress authorized costs shares that differ from this
amount, and large-scale water recycling and reuse projects receiving support under IIJA (authorized to receive up to
25% of total costs, with no dollar cap).
36 For example, Congress has authorized three projects for construction in Hawaii (P.L. 109-70).

Congressional Research Service

19

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

investigation and feasibility study had been completed and approved by the Secretary, (2) the
Secretary determined that the project sponsor was capable of funding the nonfederal share of
project costs, and (3) the local sponsor entered into a cost-share agreement with Reclamation. The
WIIN Act provided DOI with additional authority to accept nonfederal feasibility studies and to
approve and consider these projects for construction funding if they meet Title XVI program
criteria.37 These criteria require that (1) the study comply with federal laws and regulations
applicable to water reuse and recycling studies, and (2) the project is technically and financially
feasible and provides a federal benefit in accordance with Reclamation laws. The WIIN Act
authority has essentially rendered unnecessary the prior practice of obtaining specific
authorizations for individual Title XVI projects before Reclamation can pursue funding, although
Congress may still choose to authorize individual projects where it wishes to alter the terms for
federal support.
Over time, Reclamation has issued and revised multiple documents outlining evaluation criteria
for prioritizing Title XVI projects. Reclamation posted the most recent evaluation criteria for Title
XVI projects in March 2018.38

Recent Federal Funding
Total appropriations for the Title XVI program in FY2026 under P.L. 119-74 were $4.0 million.
Reclamation also allocated $539.0 million in IIJA funding for Title XVI projects in FY2022FY2025 IIJA spend plans, plus an additional $441.0 million for large-scale Title XVI projects in
FY2022-FY2025 IIJA spend plans.39
For FY2027, the President’s budget request did not include funds for Title XVI projects.

Statutory and Regulatory Authority
The original statutory authority for the Reclamation wastewater and reuse program is the
Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act, Title XVI of P.L. 102-575, as
amended (43 U.S.C. §§390h et seq.). Other statutes that authorized individual Title XVI projects
include the Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-266); the
Oregon Public Land Transfer and Protection Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-321); the 1999 Water
Resources Development Act (WRDA; P.L. 106-53, §595); the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2001 (P.L. 106-554, Division B, §106); a bill amending the Reclamation Wastewater and
Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (P.L. 107-344); the Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution, 2003 (P.L. 108-7, Division D, §211); the Emergency Wartime Supplemental
Appropriations Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-11); the Irvine Basin Surface and Groundwater
Improvement Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-233); the Williamson County Water Recycling Act of 2004
(P.L. 108-316); the Hawaii Water Resources Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-70); the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008 (P.L. 110-161); the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2009 (P.L.
110-229); and the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-11, Title IX, Subtitle
B). Programmatic authority for Reclamation to approve studies and grant funding for individual
Title XVI projects was provided in the WIIN Act (P.L. 114-322, Title III, Subtitle J) and IIJA (P.L.
117-58).

37 See generally P.L. 114-322, §4009(c).
38 Reclamation, Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, Updated Evaluation Criteria for Review and

Comment, March 2018, https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/title/docs/2018/Title%20XVI-Evaluation-CriteriaReview.pdf.
39 FY2022-FY2025 Reclamation IIJA spend plans are available at https://www.usbr.gov/bil/2022-spendplan.html.

Congressional Research Service

20

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Desalination Projects
Desalination projects develop and supplement water supplies through the treatment of ocean or
brackish water. Water supplies created by desalination projects are primarily used for M&I and
irrigation water supply, but they may also be used for other purposes. Congress authorized the
Secretary of the Interior, through Reclamation, to support nonfederal construction of ocean or
brackish water desalination projects in Section 4009(a) of the WIIN Act. Similar to
congressionally authorized Title XVI projects, this funding is awarded as grants to projects with a
completed feasibility study that has been submitted to Reclamation and that meets all of the
requirements in Reclamation’s Directive and Standard for feasibility study review of Title XVI
and Desalination Projects.40

Project Purposes
The general purpose of desalination construction projects is to provide supplemental water
supplies by treating seawater or brackish water. Projects may be permanent or for demonstration
purposes.41

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Desalination projects are funded through grants, which are available only to projects that have
submitted a feasibility study to Reclamation. Project construction costs are shared by the federal
government and a local project sponsor or sponsors. The maximum federal share is 25% of total
project costs; thus, nonfederal sponsors must be capable of funding 75% of project costs.42 These
costs may be made available through cash, costs contributed by the applicant, or third-party inkind contributions. Other federal funding may not be counted toward the required nonfederal cost
share, unless the statute authorizing a program stipulates that it may be made available for
matching cost-share requirements.

Eligibility Requirements
Like other Reclamation activities, support for nonfederal desalination projects is limited to
nonfederally owned and operated projects and studies in the 17 western United States or
territories identified in the Reclamation Act of 1902, as amended. Projects must meet several
other requirements, including having completed feasibility studies that have been submitted to
Reclamation and that meet all of the requirements in Reclamation’s Directive and Standard for
feasibility study review of Title XVI and Desalination Projects.43 Projects must also be included
in a state-approved plan or, as an alternative, be requested by the governor of the state in which it
is located. The sponsor of any project in a western state that meets the aforementioned criteria
may be eligible to apply for grants under this authority.

40 Reclamation, Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program and Desalination Construction Program Feasibility

Study Review Process, Reclamation Manual, WTR 11-01, October 18, 2019, https://www.usbr.gov/recman/wtr/wtr1101.pdf.
41 See generally P.L. 114-322, §4009(a).
42 Cost shares and other requirements under this section were established administratively. For more information, see
Reclamation, “WaterSMART: Desalination,” https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/desalination/index.html.
43 Reclamation, Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program and Desalination Construction Program Feasibility
Study Review Process, Reclamation Manual, WTR 11-01, October 18, 2019, https://www.usbr.gov/recman/wtr/wtr1101.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

21

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Several types of projects are not eligible for funding under this authority, including projects with
water reuse and recycling components (some of which may be eligible for funding from the
aforementioned Title XVI program), research and/or demonstration projects, and operations,
maintenance, and repair projects.

Recent Federal Funding
Grants for desalination project construction are funded through Reclamation’s research and
development program for desalination and water purification; total FY2026 appropriations for
that program under P.L. 119-74 were $6.7 million. Congress also appropriated $250.0 million for
these projects in IIJA from FY2022 to FY2026. Reclamation allocated $245.0 million for
desalination projects in FY2022-FY2026 IIJA spend plans.
For FY2027, the President requested no funding for the desalination research and development
program.

Statutory and Regulatory Authority
Desalination projects were authorized under the Water Desalination Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-298, as
amended by Section 4009(a) of Title II, Subtitle J, of the WIIN Act, P.L. 114-322).

Department of Defense44
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Civil Works
USACE Civil Works Projects
Storage at USACE Authorized and Constructed Reservoirs
As part of its civil works activities, USACE constructs and operates water resource projects
throughout the country. USACE civil works projects and authorities are concentrated on three
principal missions—navigation, flood risk management, and aquatic ecosystem restoration. Some
USACE activities may support M&I water supply storage (e.g., for agricultural use or M&I use),
hydroelectric generation, fish and wildlife, and recreation, in addition to addressing one or more
of the three principal missions. The most common way that USACE infrastructure supports M&I
water supply is through providing storage of M&I water at a USACE reservoir.45 M&I water
supply is generally not a USACE reservoir’s or a USACE project’s primary purpose.46 These
projects are discussed further under the heading “Storage of M&I Water at Multipurpose USACE
Reservoirs.”

44 This section was prepared by Anna E. Normand, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy in the Resources, Science,

and Industry Division, and Nicole T. Carter, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy in the Resources, Science, and
Industry Division.
45 Congress has established that construction costs associated with the M&I water supply components of USACE
reservoirs are 100% nonfederal and 0% federal (33 U.S.C. §2213(c)(2)).
46 USACE developed a document in response to congressional direction to provide the authorizing committees a report
on benefits and consequences of including water supply and water conservation as a primary mission of USACE
projects. See USACE, Water Resources Development Act of 2020: Section 221: Study on Water Supply and Water
Conservation at Water Resources Development Projects, August 2023, https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/
collection/p16021coll5/id/37142.

Congressional Research Service

22

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Congress passed the Grace F. Napolitano Priority for Water Supply, Water Conservation, and
Drought Resiliency Act of 2024, as Title I, Subtitle B, of Division A of P.L. 118-272, the Thomas
R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (WRDA 2024). The water supply
provisions of the act include a declaration of U.S. policy for USACE to maximize opportunities
for water supply and conservation measures and drought resilience efforts at and in the operation
of the agency’s water resource projects. The act also directs the Secretary of the Army to give full
consideration to requests and proposals by nonfederal sponsors for USACE to use its authorities
to further such measures and efforts in alignment with the authorized purposes of the agency’s
projects. WRDA 2024 also authorized USACE to conduct certain single-purpose water supply
feasibility studies, among other provisions.47 How implementation of the act may affect USACE
water supply activities remains to be seen.

Specific Projects
In addition to USACE operating the Washington Aqueduct and associated reservoirs which
transport and treat drinking water for Washington, DC, and parts of northern Virginia, Congress
has authorized two USACE civil works projects to have significant water supply components.
Both projects are located in Arkansas and address groundwater overdraft: the Grand Prairie Area
Demonstration Project and the Bayou Meto Basin Project. These projects received USACE
funding most recently in FY2026 at $16.0 million and $12.0 million, respectively; they were not
funded in FY2025. These three specific projects are not discussed further in this report.

Study and Construction Authority
In Section 155 of the WRDA of 2020 (Division AA of the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2021, P.L. 116-260; 33 U.S.C. §2347c), Congress authorized USACE to carry out small water
storage projects, including for water supply.48 In Section 8108 of the WRDA of 2022 (Title
LXXXI of Division H of P.L. 117-263; 33 U.S.C. §2357), Congress authorized USACE to
perform up to 10 feasibility studies (at 90% federal cost and 10% nonfederal cost) on managed
aquifer recharge projects in drought-prone or water-scarce areas.49 No projects appear to have
47 WRDA 2024’s Section 1201(a) included five single-purpose water supply feasibility studies (which were in

Michigan, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas/Oklahoma) and a feasibility study for “alternate water
supply” in Pennsylvania. Additionally, WRDA 2024’s Section 1201(b) authorized a study of modifications to a
USACE dam in California to include “water supply recharge and storage,” as well as improved flood risk management.
Section 1208 directed USACE to study whether to include water supply as a purpose for a USACE project in the
Colorado River Basin within Arizona, if such a study is requested by the project’s nonfederal sponsors or the Governor
of Arizona (if there is no nonfederal sponsor). Section 1229 also authorized a USACE study, in coordination with
relevant federal and state agencies and nonfederal interests, on water supply, availability, drought resilience, aquifer
recharge, and causes of aquifer depletion, for those regions overlying the Ogallala Aquifer. These WRDA 2024 studies
were not funded in FY2025 or in 2026 and are not discussed further in this report.
48 The provision provides various criteria for the maximum size of the storage projects and other specific project and
program requirements (e.g., federal project costs are limited to $65.0 million; M&I costs are 100% nonfederal). The
water storage capacity of a project under the program is to be not less than 2,000 acre-feet and not more than 30,000
acre-feet. The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (ASACW) implementation guidance for the Section
155 program indicates that the policy of USACE not conducting single-purpose water supply studies is superseded for
purposes of this program. Memorandum from Michael L. O’Connor, ASACW, to Commanding General, USACE,
“Implementation Guidance for Section 155 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, Small Water Storage
Projects,” April 25, 2022, https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll5/id/35987.
49 The ASACW released implementation guidance for this provision; it indicates that the managed aquifer recharge
portion of a study undertaken pursuant to this authority uses the 10% nonfederal cost share and that construction costs
follow existing USACE cost sharing for water supply set out at 33 U.S.C. §2213, which is 100% nonfederal for M&I
water supply and 35% nonfederal for agricultural water supply. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works),
(continued...)

Congressional Research Service

23

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

been funded under these two authorities; these two authorities are not discussed further in this
report.

USACE Assistance for Nonfederal Projects
Environmental Infrastructure (EI) Assistance
At the direction of Congress, USACE also provides assistance for municipal EI, which typically
consists of assistance with municipal drinking water and wastewater infrastructure projects and
municipal source water protection and development. These authorities are discussed further under
the heading “Environmental Infrastructure Assistance.”

USACE Credit Assistance Program
The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (WIFIA) authorizes USACE and
EPA to provide credit assistance—loans or loan guarantees—for a broad range of water projects.50
USACE’s program is known as Corps Water Infrastructure Financing Program (CWIFP) to
differentiate it from EPA’s WIFIA program. The program is authorized to offer long-term, lowcost loans with flexible repayment options for creditworthy nonfederal borrowers. Various state,
local, and tribal government entities and various private entities (e.g., corporations, partnerships,
and trusts) that are publicly sponsored are eligible for CWIFP loans.51
In December 2021, Congress created an account—the Water Infrastructure Finance and
Innovation Program (WIFIP)—for USACE to implement its WIFIA authority. From FY2021
through FY2023, Congress provided USACE with a total of $81.0 million for credit assistance, as
well as funding for program administration. Congress has limited the available appropriations for
credit assistance to nonfederal dam safety projects (based on dam ownership information in the
National Inventory of Dams).52 Dam safety projects can include work to upgrade, repair, and
maintain a dam, and can include dam removals.53 USACE identifies selection criteria for its
CWIFP credit assistance, including the extent to which the project is nationally or regionally
significant in generating public benefits (e.g., water quality and quantity, including aquifer
recharge, and protection of drinking water, including source water protection). In fall 2023,
USACE solicited preliminary applications from prospective borrowers seeking credit assistance
under CWIFP for nonfederal dam safety projects.54 After evaluating the preliminary applications
for the support available through FY2023, USACE in September 2024 invited 18 prospective
Memorandum from Jaime A. Pinkham, Acting ASACW, to Commanding General, USACE, “Implementation
Guidance for Section 8108(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022, Managed Aquifer Recharge
Feasibility Studies,” January 17, 2025, https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll5/id/38410.
50 WIFIA 2014, Title V, Subtitle C, of P.L. 113-121; 33 U.S.C. §§3901-3914, as amended by P.L. 115-270.
51 33 U.S.C. §3907(a)(4).
52 Congress authorized USACE’s program for a broader set of activities than have been funded (33 U.S.C. §3905).
Congress authorized USACE to provide credit assistance for water resource projects, such as flood control, hurricane
and storm damage reduction; aquatic ecosystem restoration; and navigation; and multipurpose projects that are
supported by USACE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) WIFIA authorities (e.g., drinking water,
wastewater, desalination, managed aquifer recharge, and/or stormwater system improvements).
53 An eligible dam safety project must also be a project for flood damage reduction, hurricane and storm damage
reduction, environmental restoration, coastal or inland harbor navigation improvement, or inland and intracoastal
waterways navigation improvement that the Secretary of the Army determines is technically sound, economically
justified, and environmentally acceptable.
54 USACE, Department of Defense, “Notice of Funding Availability for Applications for Credit Assistance Under the
Corps Water Infrastructure Financing Program,” 88 Federal Register 64892-64897, September 20, 2023.

Congressional Research Service

24

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

borrowers to complete their applications for an estimated almost $3.2 billion in loans. The Trump
Administration’s request for FY2026 and FY2027 did not include funds for the WIFIP account.
In FY2026 (and each of FY2024 and FY2025), the WIFIP account was funded at $7.2 million;
$5.0 million is for program administration, and $2.2 million is to WIFIP for credit assistance for
nonfederal dam safety and levee projects. Given the program’s current focus on nonfederal dam
safety and levee projects, CWIFP is not discussed further in this report.55

Storage of M&I Water at Multipurpose USACE Reservoirs
A total of 136 USACE reservoirs have roughly 9.8 million acre-feet of storage designated for
M&I water.56 Most of this water was allocated to M&I purposes when the projects were
constructed. Around 0.9 million acre-feet of this storage space has been assigned to M&I use
from existing USACE reservoirs using USACE’s general water supply authorities.57 The storage
of M&I water at USACE reservoirs, as discussed below, is subject to availability of storage space,
and the associated costs are 100% a nonfederal responsibility.58 For its projects, USACE policy is
that the agency does not acquire water rights for either M&I or agricultural water supply and
conservation purposes. Rather, the water user is responsible for securing water rights.
In addition to the WRDA 2024 direction and authorities previously discussed, Congress has given
USACE limited general authority for M&I water supply under two statutes:
1. The Water Supply Act of 1958 authorized USACE (and Reclamation) to
recommend economically justified M&I water supply storage space in new or
existing reservoirs.59
2. The Flood Control Act of 1944 authorizes USACE to provide, through temporary
agreements, surplus water from USACE reservoirs.60 Surplus water contracts
have generally been limited to five-year terms with options to extend.
Pursuant to these statutes, the agency can enter into agreements with nonfederal entities for water
supply storage.
While much of USACE’s water supply activities are conducted using the above general
authorities, Congress has also at times authorized M&I water supply activities at specific USACE
projects, principally USACE reservoirs.

Project Purposes
As previously noted, Congress authorized USACE to allocate a portion of its multipurpose
reservoirs for permanent M&I storage or to provide M&I water from USACE reservoirs under

55 For more information on USACE’s program, see CRS Insight IN12021, Corps Water Infrastructure Financing

Program (CWIFP), by Nicole T. Carter. For more information on the EPA WIFIA program, see “Water Infrastructure
Finance and Innovation Act Program” in the EPA portion of the report.
56 U.S. Army Engineer Institute for Water Resources, FY 2016 Municipal, Industrial, and Irrigation Water Supply
Database Report, 2017-R-02, Alexandria, VA, June 2017, p. 6, https://publibrary.planusace.us/#/document/e71cd9b9faff-4d63-8d42-8ee1baa3cc7f.
57 U.S. Army Engineer Institute for Water Resources, FY 2016 Municipal, Industrial, and Irrigation Water Supply
Database Report, 2017-R-02, Alexandria, VA, June 2017, p. 8.
58 33 U.S.C. §2213(c)(2).
59 43 U.S.C. §390b.
60 33 U.S.C. §708.

Congressional Research Service

25

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

temporary agreements for surplus water.61 Under these authorities, USACE delivers water if it is
available and if delivery does not substantially affect other authorized purposes.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Most agreements for new M&I water supply storage are associated with existing USACE
reservoirs. USACE policy generally is to obtain full payment of M&I allocated costs from
nonfederal entities prior to or during construction.62

Eligibility Requirements
For USACE’s water supply activities conducted using the above general authorities, nonfederal
entities can contact USACE directly about pursuing water supply activities under the general
authorities. Otherwise, nonfederal entities may submit a proposal to add or adjust water supply
aspects of specific USACE projects through an annual public proposal submission process;63
Congress may draw from these proposals when developing USACE authorization legislation.
For new USACE projects with M&I water supply, existing law and agency policy require that the
water supply allocation for anticipated demand at any project not exceed 30% of the total
estimated construction cost.64 Congress has enacted occasional exceptions to USACE’s general
authority, which is generally limited to storage of water supply at existing projects that does not
“seriously affect” other project purposes.65

Recent Federal Funding
USACE primarily uses annual appropriations for administration of its water supply authorities.
From FY2025 annual appropriations, USACE planned to use $6.5 million for USACE’s costs for
implementing its reservoir-related water supply authorities.66 Information on the amount of
USACE’s FY2026 annual appropriations that is planned for implementing its reservoir-related
water supply authorities is not publicly available.
For FY2027, the President’s budget request did not include funds for USACE’s water supply
implementation costs.67

61 43 U.S.C. §390b; 33 U.S.C. §708.
62 USACE, Policy for Conducting Civil Works Planning Studies, Engineer Regulation (ER) 1105-2-103, November

2023, p. 77. For more on payments for reallocation to M&I at existing USACE projects, see ER 1105-2-103, p. 78.
63 For more information, see CRS Insight IN11118, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Section 7001 Report on Future
Studies and Projects, by Anna E. Normand.
64 43 U.S.C. §390b; USACE, Policy for Conducting Civil Works Planning Studies, ER 1105-2-103, p. 77.
65 43 U.S.C. §390b(e).
66 This does not include such costs for projects in the explanatory statement funded from prior unobligated IIJA
appropriations.
67 USACE, Fiscal Year 2025: Civil Works Budget of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, March 2024, p. 6,
https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll6/id/2476.

Congressional Research Service

26

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Statutory Authority
Statutory authority is provided in the Water Supply Act of 1958 (Title III, 72 Stat. 320, as
amended; 43 U.S.C. §390b),68 the Flood Control Act of 1944 (§6, 58 Stat. 890, as amended, 33
U.S.C. §708), and project-specific authorities in WRDAs or similar legislation.

Environmental Infrastructure Assistance
Project Purpose
Since 1992, Congress has enacted more than 600 authorizations allowing USACE to provide
designated communities, counties, and states with design and construction assistance for drinking
water and wastewater infrastructure (including treatment and distribution/collection facilities),
source water protection and development, and other nonfederal projects. This assistance is known
as environmental infrastructure (EI) assistance.69 The authorizations of federal appropriations for
these activities have varied widely, from $0.1 million for a water monitoring station to $1.1
billion for a seven-state EI program.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Under most USACE EI assistance authorizations, federal assistance typically requires a 75%
federal and 25% nonfederal cost share. Congress typically provides the federal portion in annual
Energy and Water Development Appropriations acts.70 How USACE and nonfederal financing is
managed varies according to the specifics of the authorization. USACE is authorized to perform
design and/or construction work with appropriated funds and, generally for programmatic
authorities, may use appropriated funds to reimburse nonfederal sponsors for work they perform.

Eligibility Requirements
Because EI assistance activities are not part of a national USACE program per se, there are no
general eligibility criteria. Most USACE EI authorities specify a specific geographic location
(e.g., a city, county, or state) and a type of project (e.g., municipal drinking water) as the principal
eligibility requirements. Consequently, USACE evaluates an activity’s eligibility by identifying
whether there is an authorization for the geographic area of the activity and whether the type of
activity is eligible under that authorization. Based on a review of enacted legislation likely to
include EI assistance authorities, CRS identified authorized EI assistance in at least 46 states, the
District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana
Islands. CRS did not identify authorities for EI assistance in Iowa, Maine, Nebraska, Rhode
Island, and other U.S. territories. Because this assistance is not associated with traditional
USACE water resources projects, it is not subject to USACE planning requirements (e.g., a
benefit-cost analysis is not performed); however, other federal laws apply to EI assistance,
including the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §§4321 et seq).

68 For information on USACE’s civil works program, see USACE, “Missions: Civil Works,”

https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/. For more information on the process associated with USACE
water resources projects, see CRS Report R47946, Process for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Projects, by
Nicole T. Carter and Anna E. Normand.
69 For more information, see CRS Report R47162, Overview of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental
Infrastructure (EI) Assistance, by Anna E. Normand.
70 In addition, the IIJA and American Relief Act (P.L. 118-158) provided appropriations for EI assistance.

Congressional Research Service

27

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Recent Federal Funding
Historically, only a portion of the authorized USACE EI activities have received appropriations.
Congress typically funds EI assistance through USACE’s Construction account in Energy and
Water Development and Related Agencies annual appropriations acts. For FY2026, the
explanatory statement accompanying the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2026 (Division B of P.L. 119-74) directed $344 million to EI assistance
authorities. The explanatory statement also directed $14 million for EI assistance that USACE
allocated to projects in a subsequent work plan.71
Presidential budget requests typically do not include funding for EI assistance, with an exception
for FY2024. For FY2027, the President did not request funding for EI assistance.72

Statutory Authority
Prior to 1992, USACE was generally not widely involved with municipal drinking water
treatment and distribution and wastewater collection and treatment. The agency is now authorized
to contribute to more than 600 EI projects and programs. A WRDA or similar legislation is the
typical legislative vehicle for USACE authorizations. Beginning with WRDA 1992 (P.L. 102580), Congress has authorized USACE to assist local interests with planning, design, and
construction assistance for EI projects. Subsequent USACE authorization acts have included new
EI assistance activities and raised the authorized funding ceilings for previously authorized
projects. Most recently, WRDA 2024 (Division A of P.L. 118-272) provided a combined increase
in authorization of appropriations of $5.4 billion for these authorities. In WRDAs, Congress has
also authorized various processes to deauthorize existing authorities meeting certain criteria.73 In
two instances, these processes have resulted in the deauthorization of EI assistance authorities.
Pursuant to Section 301 of WRDA 2020 (Division AA of P.L. 116-260; 33 U.S.C. §579d-2), as
amended, USACE published on May 21, 2026, a Federal Register notice titled “Proposed
Deauthorization of Water Resources Projects.”74 The accompanying list includes around 180 EI
assistance authorities.75

71 USACE, Army Civil Works Program, FY2026 Work Plan—Construction, https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/

getfile/collection/p16021coll6/id/2575.
72
USACE, Fiscal Year 2027: Civil Works Budget of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, April 2026,
https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll6/id/2574.
73 While EI assistance authorities have been deauthorized through processes established by Congress and implemented
by the Secretary of the Army, CRS did not identify any enacted provisions where Congress in statute deauthorized
specific EI assistance authorities.
74 USACE, “Proposed Deauthorization of Water Resources Projects,” 91 Federal Register 98, May 21, 2026.
75 USACE, Proposed List for Deauthorization Federal Register Docket ID No. COE-2026-0034,
https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll5/id/38480. Although neither the statute nor the
Federal Register is explicit that the projects on the final list are automatically deauthorized once the list is submitted to
the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Environment and Public Works and it
is published in the Federal Register, that is a working assumption given no other guidance.

Congressional Research Service

28

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Department of Agriculture
Rural Utilities Service (Water and Waste Disposal Programs)76
The USDA Rural Utilities Service (RUS) administers a variety of water and waste disposal77
programs that provide grants, loans, loan guarantees, and technical assistance to support drinking
water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage facilities in rural communities. These programs help
rural communities construct, repair, and expand their water and waste disposal systems. Technical
assistance programs help rural communities identify solutions to water and waste disposal
challenges they are facing. One way these programs support rural communities is helping them
apply for state and federal grants and loans. In FY2025, RUS obligated $1.545 billion for 637
water and waste disposal projects.78

Program Purpose
The RUS water and waste disposal programs support the development, storage, and treatment of
drinking water and the disposal of wastewater in rural areas.79 Eligible projects can include
drinking water facilities, sanitary sewers, and stormwater drainage and disposal facilities. Funds
may be used for installation, repair, improvement, or expansion of rural water facilities, including
costs of distribution lines and well-pumping facilities.
USDA is required to use 3% to 5% of the water and waste grants appropriation to make grants to
qualified nonprofits to provide technical assistance and training to help communities identify
solutions to water and waste problems, prepare applications for grants and loans, and improve
operation and maintenance of existing water and waste disposal facilities in rural areas.80

Financing or Funding Mechanism
USDA supports water and waste disposal projects through direct loans, guaranteed loans, grants,
and technical assistance. USDA provides loans and grants for water and waste disposal projects
that are to serve the “most financially needy communities.”81
The Circuit Rider Program provides technical assistance to rural water systems that are
experiencing day-to-day operational, financial, or management issues. Public bodies with legal
authority to own and operate the water facility in question are eligible to receive technical
assistance. USDA RUS has contracted with the National Rural Water Association to provide
technical assistance through a network of state-based water experts known as “Circuit Riders.”
The Emergency Community Water Assistance Program provides grants to eligible communities to
help them prepare for, or recover from, an emergency that threatens the availability of safe,
76 This section was prepared by Lisa S. Benson, Specialist in Agricultural Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry

Division.
77 The programs’ official titles contain “Waste Disposal,” but the vast majority of the waste disposal projects are for
wastewater infrastructure. A small amount of funding, typically less than 1%, goes to technical assistance related to
solid waste management, although Congress authorizes annual appropriations for solid waste management grants.
78 USDA, Office of Budget and Program Analysis, 2027 USDA Explanatory Notes—Rural Utilities Service, Table
RUS-82 - 2025 Financial and Performance Data for WEP Programs (thousands of dollars), https://www.usda.gov/sites/
default/files/documents/FY-2027-Chapter-33-RUS.pdf.
79 7 U.S.C. §1926.
80 7 U.S.C. §1926(a)(14)(C), Rural Water and Wastewater Technical Assistance Training Programs.
81 7 C.F.R. §1780.2.

Congressional Research Service

29

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

reliable drinking water. Eligible entities include public bodies, nonprofit organizations, and
federally recognized tribes. Emergencies include natural disasters such as droughts or hurricanes
and man-made disasters such as chemical spills. A federal disaster declaration is not required.
The Revolving Funds for Financing Water and Wastewater Projects Program (Revolving Fund
Program) provides grants to nonprofit organizations and government entities to establish
revolving loan funds that finance projects that improve water and waste disposal systems in rural
areas. Eligible rural areas are areas with 10,000 or fewer residents.
The Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grant Program provides grants to nonprofits and tribes
to establish revolving loan funds for homeowners. Homeowners can use the loans to construct,
refurbish, or service household water well and septic systems. Terms for the loans include a 1%
fixed interest rate, a 20-year maximum term, and a $15,000 maximum loan per household.
Homeowners need to be in rural areas, which are defined as areas or towns of 50,000 residents or
fewer.
The Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program provides loans and grants for projects
that build or enhance clean and reliable drinking water systems, sanitary sewage disposal
systems, and storm water drainage to households and businesses in eligible rural areas. Eligible
rural areas are areas with 10,000 or fewer residents.
The Water and Waste Disposal Loan Guarantee Program provides loan guarantees for projects
that build or enhance clean and reliable drinking water systems, sanitary sewage disposal
systems, and storm water drainage to households and businesses in eligible rural areas. Eligible
rural areas are areas with 10,000 or fewer residents. RUS guarantees loans issued through eligible
banks, credit unions, and other lenders so that these entities can issue loans to qualified
borrowers.
The Water and Waste Disposal Technical Assistance and Training Program provides grants to
nonprofit organizations for projects that help local communities identify and evaluate water
issues. Eligible rural areas are areas with 10,000 or fewer residents.

Eligibility Requirements
The entities eligible for funding differ by program. For most programs, eligible entities include
public bodies (such as municipalities, counties, and other political subdivisions of a state),
nonprofit organizations, and federally recognized tribes. To be eligible for assistance, the
applicants must be unable to get financing for the proposed projects from their own resources or
through commercial credit at reasonable rates and terms.82

Statutory and Regulatory Authority
Statutory authority for the water and waste disposal loan and grant programs, water technical
assistance, and other rural water assistance programs is Sections 306, 306A, and 306E of the
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended (ConAct; P.L. 87-128, 7 U.S.C.
§1926, 7 U.S.C. §1926a, 7 U.S.C. §1926e).
Regulations for these programs are codified at Title 7, Parts 1779-1780, of the Code of Federal
Regulations.83

82 7 C.F.R. §1780.7(d).
83 For additional information on RUS water and environmental programs, see USDA, “Water & Waste Disposal Loan

& Grant Program,” https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/water-waste-disposal-loan-grant-program.

Congressional Research Service

30

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Recent Federal Funding
Congress provided appropriations for FY2026 for the RUS water and waste disposal programs
through the Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction
and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026 (Division B, P.L. 119-37). Congress provided the
following funding for the RUS programs for FY2026:
•
•
•
•
•

•
•

Circuit Rider Program: $23.9 million;
Emergency Community Water Assistance Grant Program: $7.0 million;
Revolving Fund Program: $1.0 million;
Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grant Program: $5.0 million;
Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program: $140.0 million for
competitive grants, $110.5 million for community project
funding/congressionally directed spending (CPF/CDS), a loan subsidy of $47.6
million to support $1.0 billion in direct loan authority;
Water and Waste Disposal Loan Guarantee Program: No loan subsidy needed to
support $50.0 million in guaranteed loan authority; and
Water and Waste Disposal Technical Assistance and Training Program: $35.0
million.

For FY2027, the Administration requested the following funding for the RUS water and waste
disposal programs:
•
•
•
•
•

•
•

Circuit Rider Program: $24.0 million;
Emergency Community Water Assistance Grant Program: $0;
Revolving Fund Program: $0;
Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grant Program: $0;
Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program: $100.0 million for
competitive grants and $58 million loan subsidy to support $816.9 million in
direct loan authority;
Water and Waste Disposal Loan Guarantee Program: No loan subsidy needed to
support $50.0 million in guaranteed loan authority; and
Water and Waste Disposal Technical Assistance and Training Program: $0.

Natural Resources Conservation Service84
The USDA provides assistance for watershed activities under four closely related authorities that
are administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The Watershed and
Flood Prevention Operations Program (WFPO) consists of two authorities—P.L. 83-566 and P.L.
78-534. Projects funded under these authorities are referred to as “P.L. 566” and “P.L. 534”
projects, respectively. These authorize NRCS to provide technical and financial assistance to state
and local organizations to plan and install measures to prevent erosion, sedimentation, and flood
damage and to conserve, develop, and utilize land and water resources. Dams constructed under
the WFPO program may also be eligible to receive assistance under the Small Watershed

84 This section was prepared by Megan Stubbs, Specialist in Agricultural Conservation and Natural Resources Policy,

Resources, Science, and Industry Division.

Congressional Research Service

31

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Rehabilitation Program. The fourth authority is a watershed emergency program that is not
discussed in this report.85

Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations
The WFPO program consists of projects built under two authorities—the Watershed Protection
and Flood Prevention Act of 1954 (P.L. 83-566) and the Flood Control Act of 1944 (P.L. 78-534).
The majority of the projects have been built pursuant to the authority of P.L. 83-566 (and are
referred to as “P.L. 566” projects). This law authorizes the chief of the NRCS to approve
construction of smaller projects (defined below), while statute indicates that appropriations for
larger projects shall not be made unless plans have received congressional committee approval.
Eleven specific projects were authorized by P.L. 78-534 (referred to as “P.L. 534” projects). They
are much larger and more expensive than P.L. 566 projects. In total, the P.L. 534 projects
encompass almost 37.9 million acres and are divided into component projects in sub-watersheds.
As of June 2026, there had been a total of 2,530 WFPO projects in all 50 states and Puerto Rico.86

Program Purpose
The purpose of the WFPO program is to provide technical and financial assistance to states and
local organizations to plan and install watershed projects. Both P.L. 566 and P.L. 534 projects
have similar objectives and are implemented following similar procedures. Both project types
fund land treatment and nonstructural and structural facilities for flood prevention, erosion
reduction, agricultural water management, public recreation development, fish and wildlife
habitat development, and municipal or industrial water supplies. Structural measures can include
dams, levees, canals, and pumping stations. Local sponsors agree to operate and maintain
completed projects.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
USDA provides partial project grants plus technical advisory services. Financing for water
projects under the WFPO program varies depending on project purposes. The federal government
pays all costs related to construction for flood control purposes only. Costs for nonagricultural
water supply must be repaid by local organizations. However, up to 50% of costs for land,
easements, and rights-of-way allocated to public fish and wildlife and recreational developments
may be paid with program funds. Additionally, sponsors may apply for RUS Water and Waste
Program loans to finance the local share of project costs. Participating state and local
organizations pay all operation and maintenance costs.87

Eligibility Requirements
P.L. 566 projects are sometimes referred to as “small watershed projects” because no project may
exceed 250,000 acres and no structure may exceed more than 12,500 acre-feet of floodwater

85 The Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) program is used to restore the natural functions of a watershed after a

natural disaster has occurred and to minimize the risks to property and life posed by floods by purchasing easements on
flood plains. For more information on the EWP program, see CRS Report R42854, Emergency Assistance for
Agricultural Land Rehabilitation, by Megan Stubbs.
86 Personal communication with USDA, Office of Congressional Relations, June 1, 2026.
87 For additional information on financing requirements, see USDA, NRCS, “Watershed Programs—Sponsor Guide,”
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Sponsor%20Guide.pdf.

Congressional Research Service

32

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

detention capacity or 25,000 acre-feet of total capacity.88 For projects that need an estimated
federal contribution of more than $25.0 million for construction or include a storage structure
with a capacity in excess of 2,500 acre-feet, the statute includes a provision that no appropriations
are to be provided unless the plan is approved by the Senate and House Agriculture Committees.89
Statute states that for a single structure with a capacity in excess of 4,000 acre-feet, no
appropriations are to be provided unless the plan (including the plan for the structure) is approved
by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the House Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee.90 There are no population or community income-level limits on
applications for P.L. 566 projects, but at least 20% of the total benefits of the project must directly
relate to agriculture (including rural communities).91

Recent Federal Funding
The FY2026 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act (P.L. 119-37, Division B, Title II) provided WFPO with $50.0
million. Of the $50.0 million, $32.4 million (64.8%) is directed to CPF/CDS projects. Of the
remaining funds, $10.0 million is directed to projects that are multibenefit irrigation
modernization projects and activities that increase fish or wildlife habitat, reduce drought impact,
improve water quality or instream flow, or provide off-channel renewable energy production.
For FY2027, the President’s budget request did not include funding for the WFPO program.92
In addition to discretionary funding through appropriations, the 2018 farm bill permanently
authorized $50.0 million annually from mandatory sources.93 In 2025, the budget reconciliation
act (P.L. 119-21) increased the mandatory funding authority to $150.0 million annually. This
mandatory funding will be available unless otherwise amended by Congress. Mandatory funds
are authorized for P.L. 566 projects as well as rehabilitation work under the Small Watershed
Rehabilitation Program.

Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
The WFPO program consists of two authorities: the Flood Control Act of 1944, P.L. 78-534, as
amended, 58 Stat. 905 (33 U.S.C. §701b-1); and the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention
Act of 1954, P.L. 83-566, as amended, 68 Stat. 666 (16 U.S.C. §§1001-1008). Regulations are
codified at Title 7, Part 622, of the Code of Federal Regulations.94

88 The enacted FY2026 appropriation included a policy provision that waives the 250,000-acre project limit when the

project’s primary purpose is something other than flood prevention (including structural and land treatment measures).
89 16 U.S.C. §1002.
90 16 U.S.C. §1002.
91 16 U.S.C. §1002.
92 USDA, 2027 USDA Explanatory Notes—Natural Resources Conservation Service, https://www.obpa.usda.gov/
explan_notes.html.
93 The 2018 farm bill authorizes mandatory funding from the Commodity Credit Corporation, a government-owned
entity that finances programs supporting U.S. agriculture. For more information, see CRS Report R44606, The
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), by Megan Stubbs.
94 For information on the program, see NRCS, “Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations (WFPO) Program,”
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives/watershed-and-flood-prevention-operations-wfpo-program.

Congressional Research Service

33

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Small Watershed Rehabilitation
Some of the oldest P.L. 566 projects that have exceeded their design life (dams were constructed
starting in 1948) need rehabilitation work to continue to protect public health and safety by
reducing any possibility of dam failure and to meet changing resource needs. By the end of 2025,
6,782 watershed dams had reached the end of their designed lifespans. In response to this
concern, Congress created a dam rehabilitation program, known as the Small Watershed
Rehabilitation Program, in Section 313 of the Grain Standards and Warehouse Improvement Act
of 2000 (P.L. 106-472), which revised the WFPO program. In FY2025, NRCS allocated over $30
million to 112 dam projects. Of these projects, 50 are in the assessment phase, 19 are in the
planning phase, 5 are in the design phase, and 18 are in the construction phase.95

Program Purpose
The purpose of rehabilitation is to extend the service life of the dams and bring them into
compliance with applicable safety and performance standards or to decommission the dams, so
they no longer pose a threat to life and property.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
Partial project grants, plus provision of technical advisory services, are provided. NRCS may
provide 65% of the total rehabilitation costs but no more than 100% of the actual construction
cost and is prohibited from funding operation and maintenance expense. Rehabilitation projects
also provide an opportunity to modify projects to provide additional benefits, including municipal
water supplies. Local watershed project sponsors provide 35% of the cost of a rehabilitation
project and obtain needed land rights and permits. The source of these funds varies from state to
state and may include bonds, local taxing authority, state appropriations, or in-kind technical
services.96

Eligibility Requirements
Only dams constructed under the P.L. 83-566 authority, the Resource Conservation and
Development program, and pilot watershed projects from 1953 are eligible for assistance under
the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program.97

Recent Federal Funding
The Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program has discretionary funding authority of up to $85.0
million annually through the end of FY2026.98 Congress appropriated $3.0 million for FY2026,
$2.0 million more than provided in FY2025.

95 Personal communication with USDA, Office of Congressional Relations, June 1, 2026.
96 For additional information on financing requirements, see USDA, NRCS, “Watershed Programs—Sponsor Guide,”

https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Sponsor%20Guide.pdf.
97 16 U.S.C. §1012.
98 The program is authorized through omnibus farm bills, most recently the 2018 farm bill (P.L. 115-334). Congress
enacted three one-year extensions (P.L. 118-22, Division B, §102; P.L. 118-158, Division D, §4101; and P.L. 119-37,
Division E, §5002) of farm bill authorizations through FY2026 and crop year 2026, which includes the Small
Watershed Rehabilitation Program’s discretionary funding authority. For additional information on farm bill expiration
and extension, see CRS In Focus IF12047, Farm Bill Primer: Overview and Status, by Megan Stubbs and Jim Monke.

Congressional Research Service

34

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

For FY2027, the President’s budget request did not include funds for the program, stating that
mandatory funding is available to support watershed projects.99
The $150.0 million in annual mandatory funding authorized for WFPO may also be used for
rehabilitation work under the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program.100

Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
The Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program is authorized by the Watershed Protection and
Flood Prevention Act of 1954, P.L. 83-566, as amended by Section 313 of the Grain Standards
and Warehouse Improvement Act of 2000, P.L. 106-472, 114 Stat. 2077 (16 U.S.C. §1012).
Regulations are codified at Title 7, Part 622, of the Code of Federal Regulations.101

Environmental Protection Agency
Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Program102
In 1987, Congress amended the Clean Water Act (CWA)103 to establish the Clean Water State
Revolving Fund (CWSRF) program.104 The CWSRF program is a federal and state partnership:
all 50 states, plus Puerto Rico, implement their own program.105 EPA receives annual
appropriations to support the CWSRF program and distributes grants to the states based on a
CWA statutory formula.106 States provide matching funds equal to 20% of the federal grant to
capitalize their revolving loan funds and use their funds primarily to provide loans to cities and
other eligible recipients. Over the long term, the loan programs are intended to be sustained
through repayment of loans to states, thus creating a continuing source of assistance for other
communities. According to the most recent estimate by EPA and states (published in 2024 and
based on data from 2022), an additional $630.1 billion nationwide is needed over the next 20
years for all types of projects eligible for funding through the CWSRF program.107

99 2027 USDA Explanatory Notes—Natural Resources Conservation Service.
100 For additional information, see CRS Report R45698, Agricultural Conservation in the 2018 Farm Bill, by Megan

Stubbs.
101 For information on the program, see NRCS, “Watershed Rehabilitation Program,” https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/
programs-initiatives/watershed-rehabilitation.
102 This section was prepared by Jonathan L. Ramseur, Specialist in Environmental Policy, Resources, Science, and
Industry Division.
103 Although the statute is commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, the official statutory name is the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act (P.L. 92-500), as amended, codified at Title 33, Sections 1251 et seq., of the U.S. Code.
104 Prior to 1989 (when the CWSRF program became effective), EPA states used their annual allotment to make grants
to cities and other eligible recipients.
105 U.S. territories, Indian tribes, and the District of Columbia receive grants from EPA under separate CWA
authorities.
106 For more information, see CRS Report RL31073, Allocation of Wastewater Treatment Assistance: Background and
Formula History, by Jonathan L. Ramseur.
107 EPA, 2022 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey, 2024, https://www.epa.gov/cwns/clean-watersheds-needs-surveycwns-2022-report-and-data. The previous survey (issued in 2016 and based on 2012 data) estimated needs of $271.0
billion over an analogous time period. See EPA, Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2012, 2016, https://www.epa.gov/
cwns/clean-watersheds-needs-survey-cwns-past-reports-and-data.

Congressional Research Service

35

Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs

Program Purpose
The CWSRF program provides assistance in constructing and upgrading publicly owned
municipal wastewater treatment plants and related equipment (including stormwater
infrastructure), implementing nonpoint pollution management programs, developing and
implementing management plans under the National Estuary Program, and supporting a range of
other eligible activities that were added to the program in 2014 and in subsequent amendments.

Financing or Funding Mechanism
EPA grants (from appropriated funds) and state matching funds help capitalize state CWSRF
programs. These programs may provide seven general types of financial assistance: making
loans; buying or refinancing existing local debt obligations; guaranteeing or purchasing insurance
for local debt obligations

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AR46471. Public record. Not legal advice.
