# The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AR41757

## Record

- **Collection:** Congressional research report
- **Document type:** CRS Report
- **Published:** April 1, 2011
- **Citation:** R41757

## Text

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of
Disability: Final EEOC Regulations
name redacted
Legislative Attorney
April 1, 2011

Congressional Research Service
7-....
www.crs.gov
R41757

CRS Report for Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

Summary
The ADA Amendment Act (ADAAA), P.L. 110-325, was enacted in 2008 to amend the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) definition of disability. On March 25, 2011, the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued final regulations implementing the
ADAAA. The final regulations track the statutory language of the ADA but also provide several
clarifying interpretations. Several of the major regulatory interpretations are, including the
operation of major bodily functions in the definition of major life activities; adding rules of
construction for when an impairment substantially limits a major life activity and providing
examples of impairments that will most often be found to substantially limit a major life activity;
interpreting the coverage of transitory impairments; interpreting the use of mitigating measures;
and interpreting the “regarded as” prong of the definition.

Congressional Research Service

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................1
Statutory Provisions ....................................................................................................................1
Final EEOC Regulations .............................................................................................................2
Overview ..............................................................................................................................2
Major Life Activities .............................................................................................................3
Substantially Limits a Major Life Activity.............................................................................4
Transitory Impairments .........................................................................................................4
Mitigating Measures .............................................................................................................4
Regarded As Having an Impairment ......................................................................................5

Contacts
Author Contact Information ........................................................................................................5

Congressional Research Service

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

Introduction
The ADA Amendment Act (ADAAA), P.L. 110-325, 1 was enacted in 2008 to amend the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)2 is a broad
civil rights act prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities. As stated in the act,
its purpose is “to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of
discrimination against individuals with disabilities.”3 The ADAAA reiterated this purpose, and
also emphasized that it was “reinstating a broad scope of protection” for individuals with
disabilities.4
The threshold issue in any ADA case is whether the individual alleging discrimination is an
individual with a disability. Several Supreme Court decisions interpreted the definition of
disability, generally limiting its application. 5 Congress responded to these decisions by enacting
the ADA Amendments Act, P.L. 110-325, which rejects the Supreme Court and lower court
interpretations and amends the ADA to provide broader coverage. Two of the major changes
made by the ADA Amendments Act are to expand the current interpretation of when an
impairment substantially limits a major life activity (rejecting the Supreme Court’s interpretation
in Toyota), and to require that the determination of whether an impairment substantially limits a
major life activity must be made without regard to the use of mitigating measures (rejecting the
Supreme Court’s decisions in Sutton, Murphy, and Kirkingburg). On March 25, 2011, the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued final regulations implementing the ADA
Amendments Act.6

Statutory Provisions
The ADA Amendments Act defines the term disability with respect to an individual as “(A) a
physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of
such individual; (B) a record of such an impairment; or (C) being regarded as having such an
impairment (as described in paragraph (3)).”7 Paragraph (3) discusses the “regarded as” prong of
the definition and provides that an individual is “regarded as” having a disability regardless of
whether the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity, and that the “regarded
as” prong does not apply to impairments that are transitory and minor. 8 Although this is
essentially the same statutory language as was in the original ADA, P.L. 110-325 contains new
rules of construction regarding the definition of disability, which provide that
1
For a more detailed discussion of the statute see CRS Report RL34691, The ADA Amendments Act: P.L. 110-325, by
(name redacted).
2
42 U.S.C. §§12101 et seq. For a more detailed discussion of the ADA, see CRS Report 98-921, The Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA): Statutory Language and Recent Issues, by (name redacted).
3
42 U.S.C. §12101(b)(1).
4
20 U.S.C. §12101 note.
5

Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999); Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 527 U.S. 516 (1999);
Kirkingburg v. Albertson’s Inc., 527 U.S. 555 (1999); Toyota Motor Manufacturing v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002).
6
76 FED. REG. 16978 (March 25, 2011).
7
P.L. 110-325, §4(a), amending 42 U.S.C. §12102(1).
8
P.L. 110-325, §3(3), 42 U.S.C. §12102(3).

Congressional Research Service

1

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

•

the definition of disability shall be construed in favor of broad coverage to the
maximum extent permitted by the terms of the act;

•

the term “substantially limits” shall be interpreted consistently with the findings
and purposes of the ADA Amendments Act;

•

an impairment that substantially limits one major life activity need not limit other
major life activities to be considered a disability;

•

an impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if it would have
substantially limited a major life activity when active; and

•

the determination of whether an impairment substantially limits a major life
activity shall be made without regard to the ameliorative effects of mitigating
measures, except that the ameliorative effects of ordinary eyeglasses or contact
lenses shall be considered.9

The findings of the ADA Amendments Act include statements indicating a determination that the
Supreme Court decisions in Sutton and Toyota as well as lower court cases had narrowed and
limited the ADA from what was originally intended by Congress. P.L. 110-325 specifically states
that the then-current Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulations defining
the term “substantially limits” as “significantly restricted” are “inconsistent with congressional
intent, by expressing too high a standard.”10

Final EEOC Regulations
Overview
The EEOC issued final ADAAA regulations on March 25, 2011, which will become effective on
May 24, 2011.11 Proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register on September 23,
2009,12 and the EEOC received over 600 comments and held a series of “Town Hall Listening
Sessions.”13 In general, the final regulations streamlined the organization of the proposed
regulations, and moved many examples from the regulation to the appendix. The EEOC notes that
the appendix will be published in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), and “will continue to
represent the Commission’s interpretation of the issues discussed in the regulations, and the
Commission will be guided by it when resolving charges of employment discrimination under the
ADA.”14 The final regulations track the statutory language of the ADA but also provide several
clarifying interpretations. Several of the major regulatory interpretations are as follows:
•

including the operation of major bodily functions in the definition of major life
activities;

9
P.L. 110-325, §3(4), 42 U.S.C. §12102(4). Low vision devices are not included in the ordinary eyeglasses and contact
lens exception.
10
P.L. 110-325, §2(a)(8); 42 U.S.C. §12101 note.
11
76 FED. REG. 16978 (March 25, 2011).
12
74 FED. REG. 48431 (September 23, 2009).
13
76 FED. REG. 16979 (March 25, 2011).
14
Id.

Congressional Research Service

2

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

•

adding rules of construction for when an impairment substantially limits a major
life activity, and providing examples of impairments that will most often be
found to substantially limit a major life activity;

•

interpreting the coverage of transitory impairments;

•

interpreting the use of mitigating measures; and

•

interpreting the “regarded as” prong of the definition.

Major Life Activities
The first prong of the statutory definition of disability, referred to by EEOC as “actual disability,”
provides that an individual with “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or
more of the major life activities of such individual”15 is an individual with a disability. The final
regulations provide a list of examples of major life activities. 16 In addition to those listed in the
statute (caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking,
standing, lifting, bending, speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking,
communicating, and working),17 the EEOC includes sitting, reaching, and interacting with
others.18
Major life activities also include major bodily functions.19 In addition to the statutory examples
(functions of the immune system, normal cell growth, digestive, bowel, bladder, neurological,
brain, respiratory, circulatory, endocrine, and reproductive functions), the EEOC includes special
sense organs, genitourinary, cardiovascular, hemic, lymphatic and musculoskeletal. 20 The final
regulations also provide that the operation of a major bodily function includes the operation of an
individual organ within a body system. 21
The EEOC emphasizes that the ADAAA requires an individualized assessment but notes that
because of the statute’s requirement for broad coverage, some impairments will almost always be
determined to be a disability. The final regulations list impairments that fall within this category.
They include deafness, blindness, an intellectual disability, missing limbs or mobility
impairments requiring the use of a wheelchair, autism, cancer, cerebral palsy, diabetes, epilepsy,
HIV infection, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, major depressive disorder, bipolar
disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and schizophrenia.22 In
addition, the EEOC provides that the focus when considering whether an activity is a major life
activity should be on “how a major life is substantially limited, and not on what outcomes an
individual can achieve.”23 For example, the EEOC noted that an individual with a learning

15

42 U.S.C. §12102(1).
The EEOC specifically states that these examples are not limiting.
17
42 U.S.C. §12102(2)(A).
18
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(i)(1)(i); 76 FED. REG. 17000 (March 25, 2011).
19
42 U.S.C. §12102(2)(B).
20
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(i)(1)(ii); 76 FED. REG. 17000 (March 25, 2011).
21
Id.
22
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(3)(iii); 76 FED. REG. 17001 (March 25, 2011).
23
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(4)(iii); 76 FED. REG. 17001 (March 25, 2011).
16

Congressional Research Service

3

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

disability my achieve a high level of academic success but may be substantially limited in the
major life activity of learning.24

Substantially Limits a Major Life Activity
The final regulations provide rules of construction to assist in determining whether an impairment
substantially limits an individual in a major life activity.25 Generally, the regulations provide that
not every impairment is a disability but an impairment does not have to prevent or severely limit
a major life activity to be considered substantially limiting. The term substantially limits is to be
broadly construed to provide expansive coverage, 26 and requires an individualized
determination.27

Transitory Impairments
The ADAAA specifically provides that an impairment that is episodic or in remission is a
disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active.28 In its appendix to the
regulations, the EEOC states that “[t]he fact that the periods during which an episodic
impairments is active and substantially limits a major life activity may be brief or occur
infrequently is no longer relevant to determining whether an impairment substantially limits a
major life activity.”29 For example, the EEOC notes that an individual with post-traumatic stress
disorder who has intermittent flashbacks is substantially limited in brain function and thinking.30

Mitigating Measures
A mitigating measure, for example, a wheelchair or medication, eliminates or reduces the
symptoms or impact of an impairment. The ADAAA provided that when determining when an
impairment substantially limits a major life activity, the ameliorative effects of mitigating
measures shall not be used.31 However, ordinary eyeglasses and contact lenses may be
considered. 32 The EEOC final regulations track the statutory language, and also provide that the
negative side effects of a mitigating measure may be taken into account in determining whether
an individual is an individual with a disability. 33 Although the EEOC would not allow a covered
entity to require the use of a mitigating measure, if an individual does not use a mitigating
measure, this may affect whether an individual is qualified for a job or poses a direct threat.34

24

Id.
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(1); 76 FED. REG. 17000 (March 25, 2011).
26
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(1)(i); 76 FED. REG. 17000 (March 25, 2011).
27
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(1)(iv); 76 FED. REG. 17000 (March 25, 2011).
28
42 U.S.C. §12102(4)(D).
29
76 FED. REG. 17011 (March 25, 2011).
30
Id.
31
42 U.S.C. §12102(4)(E).
32
Id.
33
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(4)(ii); 76 FED. REG. 17001 (March 25, 2011).
34
76 FED. REG. 17010 (March 25, 2011).
25

Congressional Research Service

4

The ADA Amendments Act Definition of Disability: Final EEOC Regulations

Regarded As Having an Impairment
The third prong of the statutory definition of disability is “being regarded as having an
impairment.”35 The ADAAA further describes being regarded as having an impairment by stating
that an individual meets this prong of the definition “if the individual establishes that he or she
has been subjected to an action prohibited under this Act because of an actual or perceived
physical or mental impairment whether or not the impairment limits or is perceived to limit a
major life activity.”36 The statute also provides that the “regarded as” prong does not apply to
transitory or minor impairments, and a transitory impairment is defined as an impairment with an
actual or expected duration of six months or less.37
The EEOC final regulations echo the statutory language, and encourage the use of the “regarded
as” prong when reasonable accommodation is not at issue. 38 The EEOC emphasizes that even if
an individual is regarded as having a disability, there is no violation of the ADA unless a covered
entity takes a prohibited action, such as not hiring a qualified individual because he or she is
regarded as having a disability.39 A covered entity may challenge a claim under the “regarded as”
prong by showing that the impairment is both transitory and minor,40 or by showing that the
individual is not qualified or would pose a direct threat. However, it should be noted that the
defense that an impairment is transitory and minor is only available under the “regarded as”
prong. The rules of construction discussed previously concerning the first or actual prong
specifically state that the effects of an impairment lasting fewer than six months can be
substantially limiting. 41

Author Contact Information
(name redacted)
Legislative Attorney
[redacted]@crs.loc.gov, 7-....

Acknowledgments
This report was initially authored by (name redacted)

35

42 U.S.C. §12102(1)(C).
42 U.S.C. §12102(3)(A).
37
42 U.S.C. §12102(3)(B).
38
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(g)(3); 76 FED. REG. 17000 (March 25, 2011).
39
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(l); 76 FED. REG. 17002 (March 25, 2011).
40
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.15(f); 76 FED. REG. 17003 (March 25, 2011).
41
New 29 C.F.R. §1630.2(j)(1)(ix); 76 FED. REG. 17000 (March 25, 2011).
36

Congressional Research Service

5

EveryCRSReport.com
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.
EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.
Prior to our republication, we redacted names, phone numbers and email addresses of analysts
who produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made
any other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.
CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.
Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.
EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AR41757. Public record. Not legal advice.
