# EPA’s Proposed Reorganization of Its Office of Research and Development

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIN12599

## Record

- **Collection:** Congressional research report
- **Document type:** Insight
- **Published:** August 26, 2025
- **Citation:** IN12599

## Text

INSIGHTi

EPA’s Proposed Reorganization of Its Office
of Research and Development
August 26, 2025
On May 2, 2025, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin announced and
opined on a reorganization effort that would integrate scientific staff from EPA’s Office of Research and
Development (ORD) into existing EPA program offices (e.g., Office of Air and Radiation, Office of
Water). Additionally, Administrator Zeldin announced the establishment of a new Office of Applied
Science and Environmental Solutions (OASES) to “align research and put science at the forefront of the
agency’s rulemakings and technical assistance to states.” Subsequently, on July 18, 2025, EPA announced
a reduction in force (RIF) that “will impact” ORD. According to EPA, the agency expects the RIF and its
ORD reorganization efforts to reduce spending. EPA’s reorganization efforts may be of interest to
Congress in its oversight role as it assesses agency staffing, funding, and activities to implement various
environmental pollution control statutes (e.g., Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Solid Waste Disposal Act)
to achieve a range of statutory objectives.
Typical ORD research and development (R&D) activities have included monitoring and modeling of
pollutants and contaminants within the environment, assessing the toxicity of various pollutants and
contaminants on human or ecological health, and developing and evaluating environmental remediation
technologies. These R&D activities, whether they are conducted by ORD or some other entity (e.g.,
federal or state agency, academia, industry, nonprofit), may help EPA program offices assess whether
environmental conditions necessitate a regulatory or response action and whether particular regulatory or
response actions are effective. ORD generally has had discretion in determining which R&D projects to
support with its funding and whether R&D projects would be conducted internally by its own staff or
through external grants or cooperative agreements. ORD’s current organization consists of four
headquarters offices and four research centers, which are further divided into divisions and branches.
While most divisions focus on specific scientific or engineering disciplines, some are regionally focused.
According to EPA’s FY2025 budget justification, the FY2025 funding requested for ORD was expected to
support approximately 1,900 full-time equivalent employees. EPA has not publicly reported actual ORD
staffing for FY2025.
Since its inception in 1970, EPA has maintained an office, led by an Assistant Administrator, dedicated to
R&D activities to complement its program offices, which primarily focus on pollution control. Pursuant
to Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970, which established EPA, certain laboratories, facilities, and other
resources from multiple federal departments and agencies (e.g., Department of the Interior, Department of
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN12599
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service

2

Agriculture) were transferred to EPA. Organizationally, most of the laboratories, facilities, and other
resources were transferred to ORD, but certain laboratories were assigned to program offices for specific
purposes (e.g., Office of Air and Radiation’s National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory).
In the late 1970s, multiple Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Acts
(ERDDAAs) were enacted to explicitly authorize appropriations for EPA’s various R&D activities and to
provide direction on research planning and priorities within EPA. During this time, Congress directed
EPA to invest in long-term environmental R&D activities to complement existing monitoring and data
collection activities that support potential rulemaking and enforcement. Additionally, some pollution
control statutes enacted during this time period, such as the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), included specific
R&D authorities (e.g., TSCA §10, CERCLA §311) that complement their regulatory and enforcement
authorities.
In the absence of annual ERDDAAs, Congress has influenced EPA’s R&D activities through
appropriations. Congress appropriates funding for integrated and transdisciplinary research program areas
within the agency’s Science and Technology (S&T) appropriations account. For FY2025, enacted
appropriations for the research program areas within EPA’s S&T account totaled $501.4 million. EPA’s
FY2026 budget request proposes $299.0 million (a 40.3% decrease) for these research program areas. For
FY2026 appropriations, the House and Senate Appropriations Committees have differed on whether to
adopt the Administration’s proposed funding levels for the research program areas and the process for
reorganizing ORD. H.Rept. 119-215 proposes to adopt EPA’s FY2026 budget request funding levels for
the research program areas and expresses support for “the Agency’s proposed Workforce reshaping to
right-size the Agency and effectively carry out the Agency’s statutory authorities.” S.Rept. 119-46
proposes $491.4 million (a 2.0% decrease) for the research program area funding levels and would direct
EPA to “immediately halt all actions related to the closure, reduction, reorganization, or other similar such
changes to ORD and the EPA scientific workforce.” S.Rept. 119-46 also notes that proposed changes to
ORD could be included in EPA’s FY2027 budget request for congressional consideration of FY2027
appropriations.
Different organizational frameworks to plan, manage, and conduct R&D activities at EPA have their
advantages and disadvantages in terms of informing EPA decisionmaking under the statutes that the
agency administers. Whether the proposed reorganization, in which R&D activities would be coordinated
by OASES and managed within program offices rather than largely by one R&D office, would result in
more efficiencies remains to be seen. Even if ORD were no longer to exist as a separate office within
EPA, congressional oversight of EPA’s R&D activities would still involve consideration of perennial
issues, such as
•
•
•
•

the appropriate level of funding for specific R&D activities and for R&D activities
overall;
the extent to which funding should be divided among basic research, applied research,
technical assistance, and information dissemination;
whether EPA’s R&D staffing and activities would be more effective if centralized in one
office or decentralized across EPA’s program offices; and
the adoption and implementation of measures (e.g., policies, guidance, programs) to
ensure that the utility and quality of R&D activities within the agency are maximized.

Congressional Research Service

3

Author Information
Jerry H. Yen
Analyst in Environmental Policy

Angela C. Jones
Specialist in Environmental Policy

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN12599 · VERSION 2 · NEW

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIN12599. Public record. Not legal advice.
