# COVID-19 and Direct Payments to Individuals: Estimated Impact of Recovery Rebates in H.R. 748 on Family Incomes > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIN11270 ## Record - **Collection:** Congressional research report - **Document type:** CRS Insight - **Published:** March 26, 2020 - **Citation:** IN11270 ## Text COVID-19 and Direct Payments to Individuals: Estimated Impact of Recovery Rebates in H.R. 748 on Family Incomes Conor F. Boyle Analyst in Social Policy Jameson A. Carter Research Assistant Updated March 26, 2020 H.R. 748 (CARES Act), as passed by the Senate on March 25, 2020, includes many provisions designed to provide emergency relief to the economy in response to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. One such provision of H.R. 748 is the “2020 recovery rebate,” a direct payment made to individuals. Similar “recovery rebates” were sent to individuals in response to the 2001 and 2008 recessions. Several Members of Congress have recently proposed varying forms of direct payment, and two earlier versions of the CARES Act (S. 3548 and a draft circulated on March 22, 2020) also included a direct payment proposal. The direct payment in H.R. 748 is structured similarly to the 2008 recovery rebates. The rebate takes the form of an advance refundable tax credit, and would rely on the tax system to pay the credit to eligible individuals. As such, this Insight refers to eligible individuals as “taxpayers.” In general, taxpayers would be eligible for a rebate of $1,200 ($2,400 if the taxpayer is a married couple filing jointly). Taxpayers could increase the amount they receive by $500 for each child that they could claim for the child tax credit. The rebate amount would gradually phase out for higher-income taxpayers. H.R. 748 includes other provisions related to the timing of rebate payments, the information used to determine the rebate amount, and administrative challenges related to paying the rebate. Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov IN11270 Congressional Research Service 2 How much would family incomes increase due to the direct payment proposed in H.R. 748? Policymakers may consider the extent to which a direct payment could increase family income. To estimate the potential impact of the 2020 recovery rebates, CRS calculated the amount that families would receive under the proposal in H.R. 748. CRS then compared the estimated rebate a family would receive to their estimated monthly income. Table 1 presents families’ median estimated monthly income and the median percentage of monthly income that families would receive as a rebate. These estimates are broken down by the ratio of family income to the poverty threshold to show the impacts of the 2020 rebate across the income distribution. Table 1 estimates that the median family living in poverty would receive a rebate that amounts to 182% of the amount of the family’s monthly income. The median refers to the midpoint of the distribution— 50% of families in poverty would receive a rebate that is less than 182% of their estimated monthly income, while 50% of families in poverty would receive a rebate that is greater than 182%. The median family living near poverty (100%-199%) would receive a rebate equal to 92% of their estimated monthly income. Table 1. Estimated median percentage of monthly income families would receive as a 2020 recovery rebate under H.R. 748 (as passed by the Senate) Ratio of family income to poverty Less than 100% (below poverty) Median estimated monthly income (before rebate) Median percentage of estimated monthly income families would receive as a rebate $850 182% 100%-199% $2,100 92% 200%-299% $3,570 56% 300%-399% $4,930 41% 400%-499% $6,240 31% 500% or greater $10,440 4% Total $3,600 57% Source: CRS calculations via the TRIM3 microsimulation model using 2016 data. Notes: Median estimated monthly income rounded to the nearest ten. Estimated monthly income was calculated by dividing families’ annual income by 12. Income reported in this analysis reflects the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) definition of income, and includes a family’s after-tax wage income, self-employment income, the value of refundable tax credits, Social Security, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), assisted housing benefits, childcare subsidies, and more. SPM poverty thresholds were used to calculate the ratios of family income to poverty. Policymakers may also consider the extent to which the phaseout provision of the recovery rebates would limit benefits received by higher-income families. H.R. 748 phases out the rebate paid to a taxpayer by 5% of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income (AGI) that exceeds $75,000 ($112,500 for taxpayers filing as a head of household and $150,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly). Table 2 illustrates how the phaseout would affect rebate amounts for taxpayers in different parts of the income distribution. Specifically, taxpayers are categorized as (1) receiving a rebate that is not impacted by the phaseout, (2) receiving a rebate that is partially reduced by the phaseout, or (3) not receiving a rebate, as the rebate amount is fully reduced to $0. The estimates in Table 2 show that 82% of families would not be impacted by the phaseout and would receive the full rebate. Almost no families with incomes below 300% of poverty would have their rebate partially or fully reduced by the phaseout. Congressional Research Service 3 Table 2. Estimated phaseout status of families eligible for a 2020 recovery rebate under H.R. 748 (as passed by the Senate) Ratio of family income to poverty Percentage of all families Family is not impacted by phaseout Family receives partial credit due to phaseout Family receives no credit due to phaseout Less than 100% (below poverty) 15% 100% 0% 0% 100%-199% 27% 100% 0% 0% 200%-299% 19% 98% 2% 0% 300%-399% 14% 87% 12% 1% 400%-499% 8% 65% 29% 6% 500% or greater 16% 24% 31% 46% Total 100% 82% 10% 8% Source: CRS calculations via the TRIM3 microsimulation model using 2016 data. Notes: Totals may not sum due to rounding. SPM poverty thresholds and the SPM definition of income were used to calculate the ratios of family income to poverty. Assumptions and limitations These estimates should be considered with a number of assumptions and limitations in mind. These include 1. This analysis is based on the current tax code. It uses income data from 2016, the most recent year for which data are available for use in the TRIM3 model. 2. This analysis estimates monthly income using an annual measure and does not reflect potential month-to-month fluctuations in family income. 3. This analysis does not estimate decreases in income that families may experience as a result of COVID-19. 4. This analysis does not account for the proposed increase in unemployment insurance in H.R. 748. 5. This analysis assumes that every eligible family would receive exactly the recovery rebate amount to which it is entitled. This analysis does not account for taxpayers who are not required to file an income tax return—it assumes that all eligible taxpayers will file, despite differences in tax filing rates based on age and receipt of public assistance. 6. This weighting used in Table 2 does not take family size into account. As a result, large families are underrepresented in the analysis presented in Table 2. IN11270 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED EveryCRSReport.com The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on issues that may come before Congress. EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to the public. Prior to our republication, we redacted phone numbers and email addresses of analysts who produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made any other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com. CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in connection with CRS' institutional role. EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim copyright on any CRS report we have republished. --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIN11270. Public record. Not legal advice.