# Military Construction Funding in the Event of a National Emergency

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIN11017

## Record

- **Collection:** Congressional research report
- **Document type:** CRS Insight
- **Published:** January 11, 2019
- **Citation:** IN11017

## Text

INSIGHTi

Military Construction Funding in the Event of
a National Emergency
Michael J. Vassalotti
Section Research Manager
Brendan W. McGarry
Analyst in US Defense Budget
Updated January 11, 2019
The President’s reported consideration of whether to invoke various statutory authorities (including some
triggered by a declaration of a national emergency) to direct the Department of Defense (DOD) to
construct “a physical barrier” along the U.S.-Mexico border has raised questions about potentially
available appropriated funds. This Insight identifies previous military construction projects funded
through emergency authorities and unobligated military construction funding balances.
Title 10 U.S.C. Section 2808 is entitled Construction authority in the event of a declaration of war or
national emergency and depends upon a “declaration of war or the declaration by the President of a
national emergency in accordance with the National Emergencies Act [NEA] (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) that
requires use of the armed forces.” A declaration by the President under the NEA must detail the statute
under which action will proceed. For discussion of the authorities the President may utilize after declaring
a national emergency in accordance with the NEA, see CRS Legal Sidebar LSB10242, Can the
Department of Defense Build the Border Wall?, by Jennifer K. Elsea, Edward C. Liu, and Jay B. Sykes.

Previous Instances
Presidents have invoked the NEA twice citing the emergency military construction authority set forth in
10 U.S.C. 2808. During Operation Desert Shield, President George H.W. Bush issued EO 12734 of
November 14, 1990. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks President George W.
Bush issued Executive Order 13235 of November 16, 2001. In the latter, the president was required and
able to renew the authority.
Congressional Research Service
7-....
www.crs.gov
IN11017
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

Congressional Research Service

2

Previous Military Construction Projects
According to DOD information, from 2001 through 2014, the department funded a total of 18 projects
under 10 U.S.C. 2808, after the President invoked the NEA, with a combined value of $1.4 billion. With
the exception of one project dating from December 2001 related to security measures for weapons of
mass destruction at sites in the continental United States, most of the projects took place at overseas
locations (see Table 1).
Table 1. Department of Defense Use of Authority Per 10 U.S.C. 2808
(2001-2014)
Date

Component

Location

Amount (in
millions of dollars)

Description of
Project

11/21/2001

Air Force

To support Operation
Enduring Freedom

26.7

Expand aircraft
parking ramps and
build hangars at two
forward operating
locations

12/4/2001

Army

Arkansas, Indiana,
Kentucky, Maryland,
Oregon

35.0

Security measures for
weapons of mass
destruction

11/17/2006

Army

Guantanamo

102.0

Secure courthouse
and support facilities

9/18/2008

Army

Bagram, Afghanistan

38.8

Barracks, power line,
and road

5/9/2009

Air Force

Afghanistan

41.3

Airfield runway and
apron pavement
improvements

5/29/2009

Army

Afghanistan, Iraq

136.2

Waste management
complex, fuel storage,
security
improvements, ammo
storage, medical
facility, and logistics
support area

6/2/2010

Air Force

Afghanistan

59.0

Airfield pavement
improvements

8/25/2010

Air Force

Qatar, UAE, Kuwait,
Afghanistan

129.1

Fuel facilities,
passenger and freight
terminal, cargo
holding area, billeting,
network control
center, satellite
communications
facility, maintenance
center, electrical
substation, special
operations forces
(SOF) aviation
complex, and ramp

Congressional Research Service

Date

Component

3

Location

Amount (in
millions of dollars)

Description of
Project

8/16/2011

Army

Afghanistan

74.0

Detention facility
expansion, airfield
pavement
improvements, and
tanker truck facility

1/13/2012

Air Force

Camp Lemonnier,
Djibouti

6.3

Aircraft parking,
taxiway, and aircraft
shelter

1/30/2012

Air Force

Qatar, Afghanistan,
Oman, Kyrgyzstan

141.2

SOF apron, taxiway,
communications
facility, ammo storage
area, and airlift apron

3/5/2012

Army

Parwan, Afghanistan

53.3

Detention housing
and dining facility

6/1/2012

Army

Afghanistan

28.0

Logistics hub, security
improvements, and
waste water
treatment plant

6/15/2012

Air Force

Camp Lemonnier,
Djibouti

187.0

Combat Aircraft
Loading Area (CALA)
and billeting

6/30/2012

Army

Afghanistan

86.0

Waste management
complex and utility
projects

8/20/2012

Air Force

Camp Lemonnier,
Djibouti

24.0

Parallel taxiway
extension

8/20/2012

Navy

Naval Support Act
Bahrain

45.2

Waterfront
development

6/14/2013

Navy

Camp Lemonnier,
Djibouti

228.0

Task Force
Compound

TOTAL

1,441.1

Source: DOD.

Funding
Section 2808 does not appear to cite a cost limitation per a project. However, it specifies as a source of
funding certain available military construction funds. Subsection (a) states, “Such projects may be
undertaken only within the total amount of funds that have been appropriated for military construction,
including funds appropriated for family housing, that have not been obligated.”
According to DOD information, the department reported unobligated balances in the military construction
and family housing accounts totaling $13.3 billion at the end of FY2018 (see Table 2).

Congressional Research Service

4

Table 2. Status of Unobligated Balances for Military Construction (MILCON) and Family
Housing Titles
(in thousands of dollars, as of September 30, 2018)
Account

Period of
Availability

Appropriated
Amount

Unobligated
Balance

% Unobligated

MILCON

2014/2018

7,969,801

244,377

3%

MILCON

2015/2018

119,946

3,887

3%

MILCON

2015/2019

4,947,617

654,158

13%

MILCON

2016/2020

6,791,551

1,774,080

26%

MILCON

2017/2021

6,797,713

2,821,042

41%

MILCON

2018/2022

9,896,613

6,755,989

68%

Base Realignment and
Closure

2,836,102

204,806

7%

NATO Security
Investment Program

7,874,381

196,231

2%

Family Housing

2014/2018

229,247

57,598

25%

Family Housing

2015/2019

82,698

11,328

14%

Family Housing

2016/2020

345,528

176,791

51%

Family Housing

2017/2021

319,535

167,082

52%

Family Housing

2018/2022

355,906

323,455

91%

Family Housing

2018/2018

1,127,108

52,147

5%

Family Housing
Improvement Fund

4,301,107

18,812

0%

Unaccompanied
Housing Improvement
Fund

80,332

632

1%

Homeowners
Assistance Program

2,923,870

40,083

1%

MILCON Subtotal

47,233,724

12,458,339

26%

Family Housing
Subtotal

9,765,331

847,928

9%

Grand Total

56,999,055

13,306,267

23%

Source: The Report of the Department of Defense on Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2018 Bid Savings and Unobligated
Balances for Military Construction and Family Housing Accounts (Execution as of September 30, 2018).

The figures cited above do not account for unobligated balances resulting from FY2019 appropriations.
The 2019 Energy and Water, Legislative Branch, and Military Construction and Veterans Affairs
Appropriations Act (H.R. 5895; P.L. 115-244) appropriated a total of $11.3 billion in military construction
budget authority, including $10.3 billion in Title I—Department of Defense (DOD) for the department’s
base, or regular, budget, and $921 million in Title IV—Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). These
figures can be found in the funding tables in H.Rept. 115-929, the conference report accompanying the
bill. These amounts reflect budget authority—not obligations (or unobligated amounts). Because military
construction appropriations are generally available for obligation for up to five years, the department

Congressional Research Service

5

likely has a different amount of unobligated military construction funding than the total appropriated
amount for any given fiscal year.
In general, as part of the President’s annual budget submission to Congress, the Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)/Chief Financial Officer publishes a spreadsheet, entitled “Military
Construction, Family Housing, and Base Realignment and Closure Program (C-1),” which details funding
amounts, facility title, and installation or location for individual military construction projects.

Congressional Notification and Reprogramming
The use of Title 10 Section 2808 requires congressional notification. Subsection (b) states, “When a
decision is made to undertake military construction projects authorized by this section, the Secretary of
Defense shall notify … the appropriate committees of Congress of the decision and of the estimated cost
of the construction projects, including the cost of any real estate action pertaining to those construction
projects.”
Nevertheless, according to DOD regulations the use of Section 2808 does not require a request to
Congress for reprogramming (i.e., a change in the application of funds). The DOD Financial Management
Regulation (FMR; DOD 7000.14-R), Paragraph 170303, Subsection (A), “Construction in the Event of a
Declaration of War or National Emergency,” highlights additional guidance in DOD Directives (DODD)
3025.18 and 4270.5, the latter of which states reprogramming is not required for construction projects
under 10 U.S.C. 2808.
Kevin Borden, Nicole Carter, Michelle Christensen, Jennifer Elsea, Michael Garcia, Bruce Lindsay,
Edward Liu, and Liana Rosen contributed to this Insight.

IN11017 · VERSION 4 · NEW

EveryCRSReport.com
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.
EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.
Prior to our republication, we redacted phone numbers and email addresses of analysts who
produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made any
other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.
CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.
Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.
EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIN11017. Public record. Not legal advice.
