# Build Back Better Act: Agriculture and Forestry Provisions

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIF11988

## Record

- **Collection:** Congressional research report
- **Document type:** CRS In Focus
- **Published:** December 7, 2021
- **Citation:** IF11988

## Text

December 7, 2021

Build Back Better Act: Agriculture and Forestry Provisions
Overview
Title I of the House-passed Build Back Better Act (BBBA,
H.R. 5376) would increase spending within the House
Agriculture Committee’s jurisdiction by $81.7 billion over
the 10-year period FY2022-FY2031 (Table 1). The
increase in spending, as estimated by the Congressional
Budget Office (CBO), is allowed under budget
reconciliation instructions provided in S.Con.Res. 14.
In the BBBA, forestry and agricultural conservation
programs each would receive about $27 billion to support
climate resilience and wildfire risk mitigation. Rural
development would receive about $18 billion, including
funding for rural electricity transition to clean energy,
biofuels infrastructure, and rural drinking water.
Economically distressed farm loan borrowers would receive
debt relief, estimated to add $7 billion to an existing $6
billion of debt relief enacted earlier in 2021. Agricultural
research programs would receive $2 billion, with half for
research facilities at universities and half split among an
assortment of research, extension, and education programs.
These amounts do not include $10 billion of increases in the
BBBA for child nutrition programs (Title II, Subtitle E) in
the jurisdiction of the House Education and Labor and
Senate Agriculture Committees. They also do not include
the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58),
such as $2.9 billion for rural broadband and agricultural
watersheds and $5.4 billion for the Forest Service.

Forestry
The BBBA would provide $27.15 billion in Subtitle B for
forestry research and forest protection, restoration, post-fire
recovery, and carbon management activities on federal and
nonfederal lands (for background, see CRS Report R46312,
Forest Carbon Primer). The funding would include $17.1
billion for management of the National Forest System
(NFS, administered by the Forest Service, is within the U.S.
Department of Agriculture [UDSA]), including funding for
hazardous fuel reduction and vegetation management; roads
and trails management; forest planning; and other activities.
The funding in Subtitle B would include $9.6 billion to
support grants and other financial assistance for nonfederal
forest management—including funding for urban and
community forestry—and grants supporting the
development and application of innovative wood products.
The funding in Subtitle B also would include $300 million
for forestry research to support activities related to forest
carbon monitoring and for conducting greenhouse gas life
cycle analyses of domestic wood products, among other
activities, and $200 million for administrative expenses.

Table 1. Agriculture in the Build Back Better Act
(budget authority in millions, FY2022-FY2031)
Subtitle of Title I (Agriculture)

Amount

Subtitle B - Forestry
National Forest System Restoration

17,100

Non-Federal Land Forest Restoration

6,000

State and Private Forestry Conservation

3,850

Administrative costs
Subtotal

200
27,150

Subtitle F – Conservation
Additions to farm bill programs

21,077

Soil Conservation Assistance

5,048

Conservation Technical Assistance
Subtotal

950
27,075

Subtitle C, Part 1 - Rural Development
Rural Electric Clean Energy Transition

9,700

Rural Energy for America; Biofuels
Infrastructure; and Rural Energy Savings

3,125

Electric Loans for Renewable Energy

2,880

Rural Water Assistance

1,067

Rural Partnership Program; Admin. Costs

1,523

Subtotal

18,295

Subtitle C, Part 2 - Agricultural Credit
Farm debt relief and loan modifications

11,676

Offset: rescinding debt relief in P.L. 117-2

-5,029

Assistance for underserved farmers

1,384

Offset: rescinding outreach in P.L. 117-2

-1,010

Subtotal

7,021

Subtitle D - Research, Urban Agriculture
Research Facilities Act, and other programs

2,000

Subtitle E – Miscellaneous
Farm and Food Worker Relief Grants, OIG
Total

205
81,746

Source: CRS, using CBO, “Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title I
(Agriculture), H.R. 5376 as modified by Rules Committee Print 11718,” Nov. 15, 2021, Rules Committee Print 117-18, and P.L. 117-2 .

https://crsreports.congress.gov

Build Back Better Act: Agriculture and Forestry Provisions
Notes: Sorted by amount and subtitle. Subtitle A is definitions only.

Conservation
The BBBA would provide over $21 billion in additional
funding for existing farm bill conservation programs, such
as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program ($9.0
billion), Conservation Stewardship Program ($4.1 billion),
Agricultural Conservation Easement Program ($1.7 billion),
and Regional Conservation Partnership Program ($7.5
billion). These programs provide financial and technical
assistance to private landowners to voluntarily implement
conservation practices on agricultural land (see CRS Report
R40763, Agricultural Conservation: A Guide to Programs).
Program funds would be directed to climate change-related
goals. Additional funding would be provided for
conservation technical assistance ($200 million), Regional
Climate Hub activities ($50 million), carbon sequestration
quantification programs ($600 million), and administrative
expenses ($100 million). The BBBA also would create a
new $5 billion soil conservation program that incentivizes
cover crop planting. Payments would be made to producers
and landowners for establishing one or more cover crops on
up to 1,000 acres annually through the 2026 crop year.

Rural Development and Energy
Rural Water
The BBBA would provide $970 million for grants to
support projects that replace service lines containing lead.
The USDA Water and Waste Disposal (WWD) Program
and the USDA WWD Grants to Alleviate Health Risks
Program would administer these grants. The BBBA would
provide $97 million in additional funding for grants for
water systems in persistent poverty counties, insular areas,
tribal areas, and colonias. The USDA WWD Program, the
USDA WWD Grants to Alleviate Health Risks Program,
and the USDA WWD Program for Alaskan Native Villages
would administer these grants.
Biofuels and Rural Energy Programs
The BBBA would provide over $15 billion for rural energy
and biofuel efforts. This would include $9.7 billion for a
new initiative, USDA Assistance for Rural Electric
Cooperatives, which would give financial assistance to
eligible entities for purchase of renewable energy,
renewable energy systems, and carbon capture and storage
systems or to make energy efficiency improvements, among
other things. The bill includes $2.9 billion for loans for
electricity storage projects and $2 billion for the Rural
Energy for America Program (REAP), $303 million of
which would be for underutilized renewable energy
technologies. REAP provides financial assistance for
renewable energy systems and energy efficiency
improvements. The BBBA also would provide $960 million
for grants for biofuel infrastructure projects (e.g., installing
fuel pumps that dispense certain biofuel blends).
Rural Business
The BBBA would provide $970 million to create the Rural
Prosperity Program, which would provide grants for rural
communities to enhance job growth and economic
resiliency. Within this program, $873 million would be for
Rural Prosperity Development Grants for states and tribal

governments, with higher amounts going to areas with
lower populations and lower income. Applicants would be
required to contribute a nonfederal match of 25%. The other
$97 million would be for Rural Prosperity Innovation
Grants for nonprofits and institutions of higher education
serving rural areas. Applicants would be required to
contribute a nonfederal match of 20% of the grant amount.

Agricultural Credit
The BBBA would replace the farm loan debt forgiveness
program in the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA; P.L.
117-2), which the courts have blocked because the relief
was found to be race-based and not narrowly tailored to
meet a compelling state interest (see CRS Legal Sidebar
LSB10631, The American Rescue Plan Act: Equal
Protection Challenges). The BBBA provision is tailored to
economically distressed borrowers and does not appear to
be based on race. The CBO estimates that the BBBA plan
would provide $11.7 billion of debt reduction ($10.7 billion
for USDA direct loan debt forgiveness—either in full or up
to $150,000 per borrower to be reduced by coronavirus and
market facilitation program payments in 2018-2020—and
$1 billion of loan modifications to direct and guaranteed
farm loans). The BBBA would replace other ARPA
assistance for socially disadvantaged groups and reallocate
it with $1.4 billion for underserved farmers. These BBBA
provisions would add $7 billion to the $6 billion repurposed
from the ARPA after being rescinded and used as an offset.

Research and Urban Agriculture
The BBBA would provide $1 billion for competitive grants
for the construction or improvement of agricultural research
facilities at 1890 (historically Black) and 1994 (tribal) landgrant institutions, as well as certain other minority-serving
colleges and universities. It also would provide $855
million for climate-related agricultural research, education,
and extension under a variety of existing programs
(including, for the first time, $30 million for the Agriculture
Advanced Research and Development Authority; 7 U.S.C.
§3319k); $130 million for scholarship programs for
students at 1890 Institutions, tribal students, and
multicultural students; $10 million for the Office of Urban
Agriculture and Innovative Production (7 U.S.C. §6923);
and $5 million for the Census of Agriculture.

Farm and Food Worker Relief Grants
The BBBA would provide $200 million in additional
funding for the Farm and Food Worker Relief Grant
Program that was created with $665 million in the FY2021
appropriation (P.L. 116-260). These grants would provide
COVID-19 assistance to frontline grocery workers.

Oversight
The USDA Office of Inspector General would receive $5
million.
Jim Monke, Specialist in Agricultural Policy
Lisa S. Benson, Analyst in Agricultural Policy
Kelsi Bracmort, Specialist in Natural Resources and
Energy Policy
Genevieve K. Croft, Specialist in Agricultural Policy
Katie Hoover, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy

https://crsreports.congress.gov

Build Back Better Act: Agriculture and Forestry Provisions
IF11988

Megan Stubbs, Specialist in Agricultural Conservation and
Natural Resources Policy

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11988 · VERSION 1 · NEW

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIF11988. Public record. Not legal advice.
