# Protecting Clean Air in National Parks and Wilderness Areas

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIF10496

## Record

- **Collection:** Congressional research report
- **Document type:** CRS In Focus
- **Published:** November 2, 2016
- **Citation:** IF10496

## Text

November 2, 2016

Protecting Clean Air in National Parks and Wilderness Areas
In 1977, major amendments to the Clean Air Act (CAA)
included provisions for the prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) of air quality. The PSD provisions were
enacted for several purposes, including
to preserve, protect, and enhance the air quality in
national parks, national wilderness areas, national
monuments, national seashores, and other areas of
special national or regional natural, recreational,
scenic, or historic value; [and]
to insure that economic growth will occur in a
manner consistent with the preservation of existing
clean air resources....
Two significant aspects of the PSD provisions relate to
federal lands and federal land managers: the classification
of areas for air quality protection and management, and the
role of federal land managers in maintaining and improving
air quality under the CAA.

Classification of Areas
The PSD provisions establish classifications of air quality
(42 U.S.C. §7472). Class I areas are those with the highest
air quality and whose air quality is most stringently
protected. Class II includes all other areas, unless they are
designated “nonattainment” for one of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) National
Ambient Air Quality Standards. The CAA provides that in
areas designated as Class I, the “maximum allowable

increase” in the concentration of particulate matter (5 µg/m3
annually, or a maximum of 10 µg/m3 during a 24-hour
period) may be only about one-fourth the allowable
increase in a Class II area (19 µg/m3 and 37 µg/m3,
respectively). The allowable increase of sulfur dioxide
concentrations in Class I areas is even more strictly
controlled as compared to the allowable increase in a Class
II area.
As specified in the statute, the Class I areas consist of
certain federally protected sites that were in existence on
the amendments’ date of enactment, August 7, 1977. The
areas that were designated as Class I included national
parks larger than 6,000 acres, national wilderness areas
larger than 5,000 acres, and certain other sites. Altogether,
48 National Park System units (managed by the National
Park Service, in the Department of the Interior);
21 wilderness areas in the National Wildlife Refuge System
(managed by the Fish and Wildlife Service, in the
Department of the Interior); 86 wilderness areas in the
National Forest System (managed by the U.S. Forest
Service, in the Department of Agriculture); and
1 international park (managed by a U.S.-Canadian
commission) were designated as Class I areas—156 sites
in all (see Figure 1).
The PSD provisions (42 U.S.C. §7474) established a
process by which the states can change area designations.
However, the initial Class I areas cannot be redesignated.

Figure 1. Mandatory Class I National Parks and Wilderness Areas Under the Clean Air Act

Source: CRS, using data from EPA, “Visibility—Regional Haze Program,” at https://www.epa.gov/visibility/visibility-regional-haze-program.
Note: Territories other than the U.S. Virgin Islands are not shown because they contain no Class I areas.

https://crsreports.congress.gov

Protecting Clean Air in National Parks and Wilderness Areas

For new protected areas established after the enactment of
the 1977 CAA amendments, the act does not provide for the
areas’ automatic designation as Class I. Rather, new
federally protected areas can only be redesignated as Class I
by the state, under the process established in the CAA. The
CAA does not specify which agency or official within the
state may redesignate an area as Class I; the legislation
merely states in Section 164(a) that “a State may
redesignate such areas as it deems appropriate as Class I
areas.” The section requires public hearings and an analysis
of the “health, environmental, economic, social, and energy
effects of the proposed redesignation,” which must be made
available for public inspection prior to redesignation. To
date, no state has redesignated as Class I any national park
or wilderness area established after August 7, 1977.
To date, no state has redesignated as Class I any
national park or wilderness area established after
August 7, 1977.
In addition to Class I and Class II, the statute envisioned the
possibility of redesignating some areas to a less stringently
protected Class III, but no state has done so.

Role of Federal Land Managers
Under land management laws such as the National Park
System Organic Act and the Wilderness Act, federal land
managers (FLMs) are responsible for protecting the air
quality for the lands they administer. The CAA also
provides FLMs with means and opportunities to protect air
quality for the lands they manage.
An FLM is defined in the CAA as the Secretary of the
department with authority over the lands in question. In
practice, the Secretary has delegated this authority to an air
quality branch or to the official charged with direct
responsibility for the land in question. The CAA gives the
FLMs certain roles and responsibilities in regulatory
decisions that might affect air quality in federally protected
areas.
All CAA regulatory decisions require public notice of the
proposed actions and opportunity for comment. Many CAA
provisions also require consultation with FLMs. For
example, EPA or the states must consult with FLMs of
Class I areas regarding permits for new major sources of air
pollution that might degrade the air quality of the areas.
FLMs would have the opportunity to demonstrate that the
increased pollution would harm the air quality, such as by
reducing visibility.
The FLM’s role is an advisory one. As noted in a 2010
interagency guidance document known as the FLAG
Report, “Although the FLMs have an ‘affirmative
responsibility’ to protect AQRVs [air quality-related
values], they have no permitting authority under the CAA,
and they have no authority under the CAA to establish air
quality-related rules or standards. The FLM role within the
regulatory context consists of considering whether
emissions from a new source, or emission increases from a
modified source, may have an adverse impact on AQRVs
and providing comments to permitting authorities (States or

EPA).” (See http://www.nature.nps.gov/air/Pubs/pdf/flag/
FLAG_2010.pdf.)
The CAA does not specify how close a new major source
must be to a Class I area to trigger the consultation
requirement. The FLAG Report states, “Generally, the
permitting authority should notify the FLM of all new or
modified major facilities proposing to locate within 100 km
(62 miles) of a Class I area. In addition, the permitting
authority should notify the FLM of ‘very large sources’
with the potential to affect Class I areas proposing to locate
at distances greater than 100 km.”
The FLM’s role in CAA decisions is most explicit for, but
is not limited to, Class I areas. FLMs also can be involved
in CAA decisions that affect Class II areas, particularly
when scenic vistas are a significant value for the areas.
According to the FLAG Report, similar criteria apply to
Class II areas: “Under the Clean Air Act, the FLM formal
‘affirmative responsibility’ role in the permitting process is
limited to the extent a proposed new or modified source
may affect AQRVs in a Class I area.... Nevertheless, the
FLMs are also concerned about resources in Class II parks
and wilderness areas because they have other mandates to
protect those areas as well. The information and procedures
outlined in this document are generally applicable to
evaluating the effect of new or modified sources on the
AQRVs in both Class I and Class II areas.”
Besides requiring that major emitting facilities obtain preconstruction PSD permits, the CAA sets a national goal of
preventing future impairment of visibility in Class I areas
and remedying existing impairment. The states are to
develop implementation plans (SIPs) demonstrating
reasonable progress toward this regional haze goal at 10year intervals. On May 4, 2016, EPA proposed revisions to
its Regional Haze Rule (81 Fed. Reg. 26942) that would
strengthen the role of FLMs in the development of these
SIPs by requiring states to consult with FLMs earlier in the
process of developing the plans.
Additionally, FLMs fulfill their responsibilities for
protection of AQRVs by participating in EPA’s
development of air quality regulations. For example, FLMs
may participate in scoping meetings and other public
forums as regulations are being developed. They also may
support scientific research on the sources and effects of air
pollution on federal lands and resources—for example, by
conducting projects to monitor AQRVs on federal lands and
by participating in interagency research committees.

For Additional Reading
For additional information, see CRS Report RL30853,
Clean Air Act: A Summary of the Act and Its Major
Requirements, by James E. McCarthy and Claudia
Copeland.
James E. McCarthy, Specialist in Environmental Policy
Laura B. Comay, Analyst in Natural Resources Policy

https://crsreports.congress.gov

IF10496

Protecting Clean Air in National Parks and Wilderness Areas

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10496 · VERSION 4 · NEW

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/crs%3AIF10496. Public record. Not legal advice.
