# Appendix — Florida Power & Light Co. v. Electrical Workers > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386414_0320%3A02 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Appendix - **Published:** January 1, 1974 - **Citation:** 417 U.S. 790 ## Text eet >> =" Ges . pe ee at EF PN ele ae or, pe eee OS SS Pr ee eer ae an Doe Supreme Court of the United States: OCTOBER TERM, 1973 * - No. 73-556 FLORIDA PowEeR & LIGHT COMPANY, Petitioner, V. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 641, 622, 759, 820 and 1263, and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondents. No. 73-795 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, . Petitioner, Vv. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, and Loca 134, INTERNATIONAL BROTHER- HOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, Respondents. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT INDEX Page Relevant Docket Entries... 4 en 83 Ra ES aa he RNa th tie oA op wee wee ai ce NE See ibe RIOR a hate swe MOH “ndlnnhing a 4 a 4 j wureielsl _— ° ii General Counsel’s Exhibits No. No. INDEX Witnesses :—Continued Edward Deady Direct Examination 0000000000000 00000ococcccee ce cceeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeee Charles Germain Direct Examination _...2..0.00....0.....2...cccceecceeec cece ee eeeeeee Leonard Farrell Direct Examination ...... gov pub ensaxawsiedeseserstsnedessegsiaiscsd Cross Examination ..... veucesececaucuetceececeescesseseecececseeeeeese James B. Howe Direct Examination _.........0000000.0000.000cceeecceesceeeeeeee Cross Examination 2....00000000000000000002cccccceecceeeceeeee eee Redirect Examination ..........0.00.00000000000000000ee-e - Recross Examination ..............0....2.....000.c0000ccheeeeeeee Richard A. Hawkins Direct Examination .......000000000000..ccccceccceceeeceeecceeeeeeee Cross Examination ...................000c0ccceeceseceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees Donald L. McClennon Direct Examination ........................ccccccccceecceccecceeeeeee Cross Examination _..........................cccccccceeccecceeceeeeees Frank J. Cunningham Direct Examintion _22.00.00000000000000occecccccc cette cee eeeceeeeees Cross Examination ............ soepedesduedsaussteseseeessuscesseesetee. : INDEX General Counsel’s Exhibits—Continued Page a 109 BP isis cata neh cient terecrsDbagtenetotdesseciociecc.-. 113 a 116 (Portions ) IN RD stenecintnerensts et ranensitnnens eset ureeeientoencercescect 140 NO. 2 esse stnentcensenertntntnstectntetenntistnsattinieeeee 142 NO. 1B nn oeeseneretneneensntetceneneuttntceetittsettcteeecce 145 NO NA econ ssenenteeensesetntntctntntentcittienetiecee 146 NO, 1G ses csseoreesnetenenesentatsabertntntrcnttepeeeeecec 147 Local 134 Exhibits: No. 1 nna tate enahhnsai cana eaeieast sesob iecwssansnceiite ket usbuigs batcepeddeieadcc ei, BONE Se hie ae AS ai le hake ae SS EF St 1200 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. (City, State and ZIP Code) Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 600 W. Washington Blvd., Chicago, Ill. 60606 2. The above-named organization(s) or its agents has (have) engaged in and is (are) engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(b) Subsec- tion(s) 8(b)(1)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act, and these unfair labor practice are unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act. The organizations since the Summer of 1968 have been and are restraining and coercing Illinois Bell Telephone Deiedn ta nt 40 . 85 the meaning of the Act, because they worked during a . strike conducted by Local 134 against the employer dur- ing the Summer and Fall of 1968. Among the repre- sentatives so fined and the amounts of their fines are the MacLennan, J. A. Marqua and W. H. Schroeder, $1,000 each; G. O. Balling, D. EB. Bennish, R. Bing, R. Bowes, J. J. Braakman, J. R. Cline, H. E. Drucker, L. Farrell, S. J. Finlay, Jr., B. Frueh, R. Goodrich, F. C. Hagen, R. A. Hawkins, Sr., E. Hedstrom, R. L. Holm, J. P. Howe, N. G. Jacobsen J r., R. O. Johnson, R. H. Kech, K. C. Klopfleisch, C. H. Kopeika, W. L. Krizenecky, J. seritt and C. §, Willoughby, $500 each, or a grand total for the foregoing named Supervisors of $24,500. The fines were imposed by the Local. Union on various dates during October and November, 1968 and were timely ap- pealed under the Union’s Constitution to the Interna- by the International Vice President at sundry dates dur- ing January and February, 1969. Thereafter the vari- ous affected representatives appealed to the International President, who on or about May 28, 1969, denied one of the appeals, that of Robert P. Murphy, and in con- sistency will, if he has not already done so, deny all of the appeals. Immediate injunctive relief under Section 10(j) is requested. 3. Name of employer: Illinois Bell Telephone Com- pany. - 4. Location of plant involved (Street, City, State, and ZIP Code): 212 W. Washington St., Chicago, Ill. 60606. 5. Type of establishment ( Factory, mine, wholesaler, etc.): Telephone company. 7 4 — iia M deeds ee ee POTN WHE 94 em Oto LACT pI Ems FLED OIC AAG ett ng ia ¢ 86 6. Identify principal product or service: Communica- tion. 7. No. of workers employed: 2,500. 8. Full name of party filing charge: Bell Sanervinurs Protective Association, not a labor organization. 9. Address of party filing charge (Street, City, State and ZIP Code): c/o G. B: Christensen, 38 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Ill. 60603. 10. Tel. No.: FI®-3600. 11. Declaration I declare that I have read the above charge and that the statements therein are true to the best of my knowl- edge and belief. By /s/ George B. Christensen (Signature of representative or person making charge) Attorney June 10, 1969 87 Wilfully false statement on this charge can be punished by fine and imprisonment (U. S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) BRL LMA Aaa ie NSIS Cott aon wre : j 3 : a 5 BI a DORNER a eet ite WX 88 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD THIRTEENTH REGION Case No. 13-CB-2890 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, and LoOcAL 134, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO (ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY) and BELL SUPERVISORS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION (Not a Labor Organization) COMPLAINT AND NOTICE OF HEARING It having been charged by Bell Supervisors Protective Association that International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO (hereinafter referred to as Respond- ent International), and Local 134, International Brother- hood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO (hereinafter re- ferred to as Respondent Local 134), have engaged in, and are engaging in, certain unfair labor practices affect- ing commerce as set forth and defined in the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 151, et seg. (hereinafter called the Act), the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called the Board), by the undersigned Acting Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Act and the Board’s Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended, Section 102.15, hereby issues this Complaint and Notice of Hearing and alleges as follows: I The charge herein was filed on June 10, 1969, and a copy thereof was served on Respondent Local 134 by registered mail on or about June 12, 1969, and on Re- ene PADDED Oy TEA 89 spondent International by registered mail on or about June 13, 1969. II (a) Illinois Bell Telephone Company (hereinafter re- ferred to as the Employer) is, and has been at all times material herein, a corporation duly organized under, and existing by virtue of, the laws of the State of Illinois. (b) At all times material herein, the Employer has maintained its principal office and place of business at 225 West Randolph Street, Chicago, Illinois, and branch offices and places of business in the States of Illinois and Indiana. (c) The Employer is engaged in the business of pro- viding local and long-distance communications and related services as part of a nationwide telephone system. (d) During the past calendar year, the Employer, in the course and conduct of its business operations, derived gross reyenue in excess of one million dollars for com- munication services between points within the States of Illinois and Indiana, and points in other States. (e) During the past calendar year, the Employer, in the course and conduct of its business operations, had a gross volume of business in excess of one million dollars. III The Employer is now, and at all times material herein has been, an employer engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. IV (a) Respondent International is, and has been at all material times herein, a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act. (b) Respondent Local 134 is, and has been at all ma- terial times herein, a labor organization within the mean- _ ing of Section 2(5) of the Act. — RE Hernan tem core tEetynmencere ee a TONERS aR AR TRE Bae SEs aeN 90 V (a) At all times material herein, there is, and has been, a collective-bargaining agreement between Respond- ent Local 134 and the Employer. (b) The aforementioned Agreement was entered into in 1948 and was last amended June 30, 1968, to be ef- fective through June 26, 1971. (c) Under the Agreement referred to in subpara- graphs (a) and (b) referred to above, Respondent Local 134 is the exclusive representative of employees described in Article II, Section 1 (A), of said collective-bargaining agreement. (d) The persons employed by the Employer in the classifications set forth below are members of Respond- ent Local 134 under the terms of the collective-bargaining agreement referred to above in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c), or because they voluntarily have become mem- bers of Respondent Local 134. (1) District Installation Superintendent (2) Plant Assignment Foreman (3) PBX Installation Foreman (4) Assistant Staff Supervisor (5) General Foreman (6) Building Cable Foreman (7) Test Center Foreman (8) Engineer VI (a) Including among the duties of persons occupying the classifications set out in paragraph V (d) above are: The authority to adjust grievances in the interest of the employer; and Supervisory authority in the day-to-day contact with employees of the Employer involved herein. (b) In addition, persons occupying the classifications set out in paragraph V (d) above are, because of their 91 supervisory positions, persons upon whom the Employer has called, and/or is likely to call, as representatives of the Employer for the purpose of adjusting grievances and/or, as representatives in. collective-bargaining nego- tiations. (c) At all times material herein, the persons employed by the Employer, occupying the classifications set out in paragraph V (d) above, have been, and are, supervi- sors and agents of the Employer within the meaning of Sections 2(11) and 2(13) of the Act, or are managerial employees. . VII (a) On May 8, 1969, Respondent Local 134, as a member of System Council T-4, struck the Employer. (b) The strike continued until.September 20, 1968. (c) During the strike, persons in classifications re- ferred to in paragraph V (d) above worked and/or su- pervised the performance of work on behalf of the Em- ployer. (d) Following the conclusion of the strike, Respond- ent Local 134 investigated, pressed charges against and imposed fines on the individuals named in Appendix “A” attached hereto. (e) The individuals named in said Appendix “A” were fined by Respondent Local 134 because they worked and/ or supervised the performance of work on behalf of the Employer during the aforementioned strike. (f) In addition, the persons named in Appendix “B” attached hereto were fined by Respondent Local 134 because of their leadership in, and/or participation in, the Bell Supervisors Protective Association, (g) Said Association, referred to in paragraph (f) above, was formed during the aforementioned strike to promote the interest of the Employer’s supervisors, in- cluding those persons in the classifications named in para- graph V (d) above. VIII (a) The Constitution of Respondent International, in Article XXVII titled “Misconduct, Offenses and Penal- 92 ties,” under the subheading titled ‘““Appeals,”’ provides, in Sections 12, 14, 15, and 16, as follows: Sec. 12. Any member who claims an injustice has been done him by any L.U. [Local Union] or -trial board, or by any Railroad Council, may appeal to the I.V.P. [International Vice-President] any time within 45 days after the date of the action com- plained of. If the appeal is from an action of a railroad local union, or a Railroad Council, it must go to the I.V.P. in charge of railroad matters. A copy of any appeal must be filed with the L.U., or with the Railroad Council, as the case may be. Sec. 14. When a decision has been rendered by the I.V.P. it shall become effective immediately. See. 15. No appeals from decisions of the I.V.P., or from the I.P., or from the I.E.C. [International Executive Committee], shall be recognized unless the party or parties appealing have complied with the decision from which they have appealed. However, this section may be waived by the party making the decision if good and sufficient reasons are furnished and he is requested to do so. Sec. 16. Appeals to the I.P. and to the I.E.C., and to the convention, to be considered, must be made within 30 days from the date of the decision ap- pealed from. (Appeals to the ILE.C. and to conven- tions must be filed with the I.S.) If no appeal is made within 30 days from the date that any deci- sion is rendered, such decision shall be considered final. (b) Subsequent to the imposition of fines referred to in subparagraph (a) above, the individuals named in Ap- pendix “A”, pursuant to Respondent International’s Con- stitution, Article XXVII, Section 12, as stated in sub paragraph (a) above, appealed the imposition of said fines by Respondent Local 134 to a Vice-President of Re- spondent International. (ec) In or about January and/or February 1969, a Vice-President of Respondent International affirmed Re 93 spondent Local 134’s decision to impose the fines on ¥ dividuals named in Appendix “A.” (d) Pursuant to Respondent International’s Constitu- tion, Article XXVII, Section 16, in subparagraph (a) above, the individuals named in Appendix “A” appealed the decisions of a Vice-President of Respondent Inter- national, upholding the fines imposed by Respondent Local 134. (e) In or about late May and/or early August 1969, the President of Respondent International affirmed the decisions of a Vice-President to uphold the fines imposed on. the individuals named in Appendix “A” by Respond- ent Local 134 and dismissed the aforesaid appeals. IX In or about October 1969, and continuing to date, Re- spondent Local 134, through their officers and agents, have attempted to collect, and have, in fact, collected said fines imposed on persons named in Appendix “A.” X The conduct of Respondent Local 134 as described in paragraph VII, subparagraphs (d), (e) and (f), and paragraph IX above, has the foreseeable effect to bring, or is bringing pressure upon the individuals employed in the classifications set forth in paragraph V (d) above —those fined and those not fined—to force them to place their allegiance to Respondent Local 134 above their al- legiance to the Employer, whenever those respective in- terests might conflict. XI By the conduct referred to in paragraph VII, subpara- graphs (d), (e) and (f), and paragraph IX above, Re- spondent Local 134 impinged, and is impinging on the Employer’s statutory rights to select its representatives for collective bargaining and grievance adjustments, and to rely upon the uncontested allegiance of the selected representatives, by causing the Employer to reasonably believe that their grievance adjustors and collective-bar- 94 gaining representatives will place their allegiance to Re- spondent Local 134 above their allegiance to the Employer, whenever those respective interests might conflict. XII The conduct of Respondent Local 134 described in para- graph VII, subparagraphs (d), (e) and (f), and para- graph IX above, constitutes restraint and coercion of the Employer in the selection of its representatives within the meaning of Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Act, and, by - such conduct, Respondent Local 134 has violated, and is violating, Section 8(b) (1) (B) of the Act. XIII (a) Respondent International, by sustaining the deci- sion and discipline of Respondent Local 134, and dismiss- ing the appeals as aforesaid, sanctioned the conduct of Local 134 and the foreseeable effect of such conduct as described in paragraph VII, subparagraphs (d), (e) and (f), and paragraphs IX and X above. (b) In or about October 1969, and continuing to date, Respondent International, through their officers and agents, have attempted to collect, and have, in fact, col- lected said fines imposed on persons named in Appendix “_ XIV (a) By its conduct described in paragraph XIII above, Respondent International thereby is impinging on the Employer’s statutory rights to select its representatives for collective bargaining and grievance adjustments, and to rely upon the uncontested allegiance of selected repre- sentatives. (b) Respondent International thereby continued, and is continuing, the restraint and coercion of the Employer in the selection of its representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining and the adjustment of grievances within the meaning of Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Act. 95 XV By its conduct described in paragraph VIII, subpara- graphs (c) and (e), and paragraphs XIII and XIV, Respondent International has violated, and is violating, Section 8(b) (1) (B) of the Act. XVI The acts of Respondents Local 134 and International described above in paragraphs VII through XV, occurring in connection with the operations of the Employer de- scribed in paragraph II above, have a close, intimate. and substantial relation to trade, traffic and commerce among the several States, tend to lead to labor disputes burden- ing and obstructing commerce and the free flow of com- merce, and constitute unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 8(b) (1) (B) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the 9th day of Feb ruary, 1970, at 10 a.m., in Room 824-A, United States Courthouse and Federal Office Building, 219 South Dear- born Street, Chicago, Illinois, a hearing will be conducted before a duly designated Trial Examiner of the National Labor Relations Board on the allegations set forth in the above Complaint, at which time and place you will have the right to appear in person, or otherwise, and give testimony. Attached is Form NLRB-4668, Sum- mary of Standard Procedures in Formal Hearings Held before the National Labor Relations Board in Unfair Labor Practice Cases As Taken from the Board’s Pub- lished Rules and Regulations and Statements of Pro- cedure. _ You are further notified that, pursuant to Section 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended, Respondents Local 134 and Inter- national shall file with the undersigned Acting Regional Director, acting in this matter as agent of the National Labor Relations Board, an original and four copies of an Answer to said Complaint within ten days from the date of service thereof, and that unless it does so, all of the allegations in the Complaint shall be deemed to DPE EE SEALE LAL MELE OLLI AION, ES 96 be admitted to be true and may be so found by the Board. DATED at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of Decem- ber, 1969. /3/ Martin H. Schneid MARTIN H. SCHNEID Acting Regional Director National Labor Relations Board Thirteenth Region Room 881, United States Court- house and Federal Office Building 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Attachments 97 APPENDIX “A” Name Title When Fined G. O. Balling C. H. Barnes D. Bennish R. B. Bing R. J. Bowes J. Braakman J. Cline F. Crowley H. E. Drucker A. Ehrhardt L. F. Farrell _S. Finlay B. Frueh B. J. Gacek R. Goodrich F. Hagen E. Hedstrom R. Holm J. Howe N. G. Jacobson R. Q. Johnson R. H. Kech T. Keegan K. C. Klopfleisch C. Kopieka W. Krizenecky V. Lovell J.T. Magnuson District Installation Supt. Plant Assignment Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman Assistant Staff Supervisor PBX Installation Foreman Assistant Staff Supervisor PBX Installation Foreman Engineer Test Center Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman Building Cable Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman Building Cable Foreman Engineer PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman Plant Assignment Foreman a a ae ee eBabias sae hat nh UAT OC RAS ober ae 2 Spell aentys Rae e cB eta Ne de ee MR ee eC ee ee 98 Name Title When Fined P. S. McCloskey K. McGuire J. Moore R. H. Muench R. P. Murphy A. Novello C. W. Paulson I. W. Plahm G. E. Roth G. Schaeffer C. R. Schmidt J. Schraag R. A. Schulz N. Skertich M. R. Tagney R. Thome G. M. Waters R. J. Wenserett W. S. Wheeler D. L. MacLennan C. S. Willoughby H. W. Anderson R. A. Hawkins J. Marqua W. Schroeder ne, f) LL FL LUA OLLIE LE MRE ENOL PONY LET AS PHL Res Heyy PBX Installation Foreman Assistant Staff Supervisor PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman Building Cable Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman General Foreman District Installation Supt. PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman PBX Installation Foreman Oe RESIN VO LAL OLE ALE ey Se MOE 99 APPENDIX “B” Name Title When Fined D.L.MacLennan — General Foreman H. W. Anderson -- PBX Installation Foreman R. A. Hawkins — PBX Installation Foreman J. Marqua — PBX Installation Foreman W. Schroeder — PBX Installation Foreman PULL OREO GT BOS ONE NROR ETT OE CTE ATES tan a ea err en tre ay a 100 Form NLRB-4668 (9-67) (C CASES) SUMMARY OF STANDARD PROCEDURES IN FORMAL HEAR- INGS HELD BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD IN UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CASES AS TAKEN FROM THE BOARD’S PUBLISHED RULES AND REGULATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF PROCEDURE The hearing will be conducted by a Trial Examiner of the National Labor Relations Board. He will preside at the hearing as an independent, impartial trier of the facts and the law and his decision in due time will be served on the parties. His headquarters are either in Washington, D.C. or San Francisco, California. At the date, hour, and place for which the hearing is set, the Trial Examiner, upon the joint request of the parties, will conduct a “pre-hearing” conference, prior to or shortly after the opening of the hearing, to assure that the issues are sharp and clear-cut; or he may, on his own initiative, conduct such a conference. He will preside at any such conference, but he may, if the oc- casion arises, permit the parties to engage in private discussions. The conference will not necessarily be re- corded, but it may well be that the labors of the con- ference will be evinced in the ultimate record—for ex- ample, in the form of statements of position, stipula- tions, and concessions. Except under unusual circum- stances, the Trial Examiner conducting the prehearing conference will be the one who will conduct the hearing; and it is expected that the formal hearing will com- mence or be resumed immediately upon completion of the prehearing conference. No prejudice will result to any. party unwilling to participate in or to make stipulations or concessions during any prehearing conference. (This is not to be construed as preventing the parties from meeting earlier for similar purposes. To the con- trary, the parties are encouraged to meet prior to the time set for hearing’ in-an°@itofuto~narrgw thacissves.), Parties may be represented by an attorney or other representative and present evidence relevant to the issues. ST ALR ar a rider LAO RETTR CR WRAY eee TeRaNr Rie htew — 101 An official reporter will make the only official transcript of the proceedings, and all citations in briefs and argu- ments must refer to the official record. The Board will not certify any transcript other than the official tran- script for use in any court litigation. Proposed cor- rections of the transcript should be submitted, either by way of stipulation or motion, to the Trial Examiner for his approval. All matter that is spoken in the hearing room while the hearing is in session will be recorded by the official reporter unless the Trial Examiner specifically directs off-the-record discussion. In the event that any party wishes to make off-the-record s tements, a request to go off the record should be directed to the Trial Ex- aminer and not to the official reporter. Statements of reasons in support of motions and ob- jections should be specific and concise. The Trial Ex- aminer will allow an automatic exception to all ad- verse rulings, and, upon appropriate order, an objection and exception will be permitted to stand to an entire line of questioning. All exhibits offered in evidence shall be in duplicate. Copies shall also be supplied to other parties. If a copy of any exhibit is not available at the time the original is received, it will be the responsibility of the party of- fering such exhibit to submit the copy before the close of hearing. In the event such copy is not submitted, and the filing thereof has not for good reason shown been waived by the Trial Examiner, any ruling receiv- ing the exhibit may be rescinded and the exhibit re- jected. Any party shall be entitled, upon request, to a reason- able period at the close of the hearing for oral argument, which shall be included in the stenographic report of the hearing. In the absence of a request, the Trial Examiner may himself ask for oral argument, if at the close of the hearing he believes that such argument would be bene- ficial to his understanding of the contentions of the par- tives ail thie fratund, ‘esses inwlrad. Any party shall also be entitled upon request made before the close of the hearing, to file a brief or proposed * ee RTO VLEET "UHR RUT my my hit 8 IR Le Pin 0) 0 Oona RS pie Bist co attains ans F FER ers power 102 findings and conclusions, or both, with the Trial Exam- iner who will fix the time for such filing. Attention of the parties is called to the following re- quirements laid down in Section 102.42 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations with respect to the procedure to be followed before the proceeding is transferred to the Board: No request for an extension of time within which to submit briefs or proposed findings to the Trial Exam- iner will be considered unless received by the Chief Trial Examiner in Washington, D. C. (or, in cases under the San Francisco, California branch office of Trial Exam- iners, the Associate Chief Trial Examiner in charge of such office) at least 3 days prior to the expiration of time fixed for the submission of such documents. Notice of request for such extension of time must be served simul- taneously upon all other parties, and proof of such service furnished to the Chief Trial Examiner or Associate Chief Trial Examiner, as the case may be. All briefs or proposed findings filed with the Trial Examiner must be submitted in triplicate, and may be in typewritten, printed, or mimeographed form, with service upon the other parties. In due course the Trial Examiner will prepare and file with the Board his decision in this proceeding, and will cause a copy thereof to be served upon each of the parties. Upon filing of the said decision, the Board will enter an order transferring this case to itself, and will serve copies of that order, setting forth the date of such trans- fer, upon all parties. At that point, the Trial Examiner’s official connection with the case will cease. The procedure to be followed before the Board from that point forward, with respect to the filing of exceptions to the Trial Examiner’s Decision, the submission of sup- porting briefs, requests for oral argument before the Board, and related matters, is set forth in the Board’s Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended, particularly in Section 102.46, and following sections. A summary of the more pertinent of these provisions will be served upon the parties together with the order transferring the case to the Board. a ile ee aL en Tete 103 Adjustments or settlements consistent with the policies of the Act reduce government expenditures and promote amity in labor relations. Upon request, the Trial Ex- aminer will afford reasonable Opportunity during the hearing for discussions between the parties if adjust- ment appears possible, and may himself suggest. OPIN RTO OR TENS T (8 YOR Nm we aN Ng oe IE PIN AN ery . yw ne at Lo th: be he htt OE ae BAEC 0 aE et EPO A LIK OTe cL te Tg ae PUA I rT Rs teh 9 oa IF Se ne ee 104 G. C. ExH. 1(e) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD THIRTEENTH REGION Case No. 13-CB-2890 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, and LOCAL 134, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO (ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY) and BELL SUPERVISORS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION (Not a Labor Organization) ANSWER OF LOCAL 134 TO COMPLAINT Now comes LOCAL 134, INTERNATIONAL BROTH- ERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO (hereinafter called Local Union), by its attorneys, ROB- ERT E. FITZGERALD, JR., and EDWARD J. CALI- HAN, JR., and answers the Complaint in the above cap- tioned case as follows: A) The Local Union admits the allegations contained in paragraphs I, II (a) (b) (c) (d) and (e), III, IV (a) and (b), VII (a) and (b), and VIII (a). B) The Local Union denies each and_every allegation contained in paragraphs V (a) (b) (c) and (d), VI (a) (b) and (ce), VII (c) (d) (e)(f) and (g), VIII (b) (e) (d) and (e), IX, X, XI, XII, XIII (a) and (b), XIV (a) and (b), XV and XVI. C) The Local Union affirmatively states as follows: 1. That the charging party, the so-called Bell Super- visors Protective Association, is a company dominated labor organization, which was formed by the Illinois Dy zeae, % . TPE LEAR IN CC BYE POE ON ane mag {LON Rely Vey 105 Bell Telephone Company, during the strike referred to in paragraph VII (a) and (b), for the purpose of solicit- ing members of the Local Union to voluntarily act as strike breakers, by performing the craft work of their fellow members who were on strike. 2. That most of the persons listed in Exhibit A of the Complaint voluntarily acted as strike breakers by performing the craft work of their fellow members who were on strike, and that the Loca] Union fined most of © the persons listed in Exhibit A for engaging in that conduct. 3. That the Local Union fined the persons listed in Exhibit B for their conduct in assisting the Illinois Bell Telephone Company in the formation and operation of the company dominated labor organization referred to in 1 above. 4. That all of the conduct of the Local Union was with- in the proviso of Section 8(b) (1) of the Act. WHEREFORE, the Local Union prays that the Com- plaint herein be dismissed. /8/ Robert E. Fitzgerald, Jr. ROBERT FE. FITZGERALD, JR. /8/ Edward J. Calihan, Jr. EDWARD J. CALIHAN, JR. Attorneys for Local 134, Inter- national Brotherhood of Elec- trical Workers, AFL-CIO 53 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, Illinois 60604 922-3113 ARG BA NOE TIN AD Gras A ae 0 cae AA AS OBL ON 106 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Answer have been mailed this 138th day of January, 1970, via regular mail to: Ross M. Madden, Regional Director National Labor Relations Board Thirteenth Region Room 881, United States Courthouse 219 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 George B. Christensen, Esq. Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson 38 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO Attn: Laurence J. Cohen, Esq. 1200 - 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, 600 West Washington Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60606 Bell Supervisors Protective Association c/o George B. Christensen, Esq. Winston, Strawn, Smith & Patterson 38 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 /s/ Robert E. Fitzgerald, Jr. ROBERT E. FITZGERALD, JR. 107 G. C. Exu. 1(f) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD THIRTEENTH REGION Case No. 13-CB-2890 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO, and LocaL 134, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO (ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY) and BELL SUPERVISORS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ANSWER OF RESPONDENT INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO (hereinafter Respondent International), here- with files this Answer to the allegations in the Com- plaint and Notice of Hearing issued by the Acting Re- gional Director for Region 13 on December 31, 1969. Respondent International admits the allegations of the Complaint contained in paragraphs I, II(a)-(e), III, IV(a)-(b), VII (a)-(b) and VIII (a). Respondent International denies the allegations of the Complaint contained in paragraphs V(a)-(d), VI(a)- (ec), VII (e)-(g), VIII (b)-(e), IX, X, XI, XII, XIII (a)- (b), XIV(a)-(b), XV and XVI. In addition to the denial of the paragraphs of the Complaint set forth above, Respondent International sets forth as affirmative defenses the following: 1. Assuming, arguendo, the truth of all the factual alle- gations in the Complaint, the conduct described therein does not violate Section 8(b) (1) (B) of the Act as a matter of law. : Swe vile ie OSS tebe IP Faw Vendio aed Pree NONE ace Dy PU rte eed —e. 108 2. Respondent International did not, in fact or in law, fine or otherwise discipline any of the individuals listed in Appendices A or B to the Complaint, nor was Respond- ent Local 134 acting for or on behalf of the Internation- al with respect to any actions it took against said indi- viduals. Therefore, assuming, arguendo, that Respondent Local 134 is found to have violated Section 8(b) (1) (B) as alleged in the Complaint, Respondent International committed no act itself which constitutes a violation of Section 8(b) (1) (B); nor can any violation of that Sec- tion be found based on its status as the parent organiza- tion of Respondent Local 134. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Laurence J. Cohen LAURENCE J. COHEN SHERMAN, DUNN & COHEN 1200 - 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20005 Counsel for Respondent International CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Answer were mailed this 14th day of January 1970 to the fol- lowing: Robert E. Fitzgerald, Jr., Esquire 53 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1112 Chicago, Illinois 60604 George B. Christensen, Esquire 38 South Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Laurence J. Cohen 109 G. C. Exu. 1(i) Form NLRB-508 Form Approved (2-60) Budget Bureau No. 64-R003.11 DOCKETED ® UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD AMENDED CHARGE AGAINST LABOR ORGANIZATION OR ITS AGENTS INSTRUCTIONS: File an original and 3 copies of this charge and an additional copy for each organization, each local and each individual named in item 1 with the NLRB regional director for the region in which the alleged unfair labor practice occurred or is occurring. Do Not Write in This Space Case No. 13-CB-2890 Date Filed March 2, 1970 1. Labor Organization or Its Agents Against Which Charge Is Brought Name International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO 1200 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. Address (Street, City, State and Zip Code) Local 134, International Brotherhood of Elec- trical Workers 600 W. Washington Blvd., Chicago, Ill. 60606 The above-named organization(s) or its agents has (have) engaged in and is (are) engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of section 8(b) subsec- tion(s) 8(b)(1)(B) of the National Labor Relations MEARS BOLE CLOG LIE LS REL EN LT (oL BIOS AN SLO «OOS eR I IN Re SSS ILL RS IIL OSE EDD LONE: YEE OTT II 110 Act, and these unfair labor practices are unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of the j Act. 2. Basis of the Charge (Be specific as to facts, names, addresses, plants involved, dates, places, etc.) The organizations since the Summer of 1968 have been and are restraining and coercing Illinois Bell j Telephone Company in the selection of its representa- 3 tives for the purposes of collective bargaining or the 4 adjustment of grievanees by levying fines in large ; amounts of money against sundry of such repre- sentatives, supervisors within the meaning of the Act, because they worked during a strike conducted by Local 134 against the employer during the Sum- : mer and Fall of 1968. Among the representatives so fined and the amounts of their fines are the follow- ing: H. W. Anderson, R. A. Hawkins, Jr., D. L. MacLennan, J. A. Marqua and W. H. Schroeder, $1,000 each; G. O. Balling, D. E. Bennish, R. Bing, : R. Bowes, J. J. Braakman, J. R. Cline, H. E. Druck- 4 er, L. Farrell, S. J. Finlay, Jr., B. Frueh, R. Good- rich, F. C. Hagen, R. A. Hawkins, Sr., E. Hedstrom, R. L. Holm, J. P. Howe, N. G. Jacobsen Jr., R. O. Johnson, R. H. Kech, K. C. Klopfleisch, C. H. Kope- ika, W. L. Krizonecky, J. T. Magnuson, P. S. Mc- Closkey, K. G. Mcguire, J. E. Moore, R. H. Muench, : R. P. Murphy, C. W. Paulson, I. I. Plahm, G. E. . Roth, G. F. Schaefer, C. Schmidt, R. A. Schulz, N. ; Skertich, R. E. Thome, G. Waters, R. J. Wenseritt and C. S. Willoughby, $500 each, or a grand total for the foregoing named supervisors of $24,500. The : fines were imposed by the Local Union on various 3 dates during October and November, 1968 and were : timely appealed under the Union’s Constitution to E the International Vice President at sundry dates during October, November and December, 1968. The appeals were denied by the International Vice Presi- dent at sundry dates during January and February, 1969. Thereafter the various affected representa- tives appealed to the International President, who on or about May 28, 1969, denied one of the appeals, that of Robert P. Murphy, and in consistency will, if he has not already done so, deny all of the ap- sstieeieeeeanadtinil —_— _— 10. 111 peals. Immediate injunctive relief under Section 10 (j) is requested. The charging party is informed and believes that $500 fines were imposed by the Local Union at vari- ous dates during October and November, 1968 upon the following named representatives of Illinois Bell — Telephone Company; C. H. Barnes T. Keegan M. R. Pagney F. Crowley V. Lovell W. S. Wheeler A. Ehrhardt A. Novello R. A. Schultz B. J. Gacek J. Schraag J. Braakman but is without information as to whether said fines were appealed. Name of Employer Illinois Bell Telephone Company Logation of Plant Involved (Street, City, State, and ZIP Code) 212 W. Washington St., Chicago, Ill. 60606 Type of Establishment (Factory, mine, wholesaler, etc.) Telephone company Identify Principal Product or Service Communication No. of Workers Employed 2,500 Full Name of Party Filing Charge Bell Supervisors Protective Association, not a labor organization Address of Party Filing Charge (Street, City, State and ZIP Code) c/o G. B. Christensen One First National Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60670 . Tel. No. 786-5600 112 | 11. Declaration i I declare that I have read the above charge and that the statements therein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. = By /s/ George B. Christensen ; (Signature of representative or person making charge) December 29, 1969 Attorney . (Date) ' (Title or office, if any) : Wilfully false statements on this charge can be punished Z by fine and imprisonment (U. S. Code, Title 18, Section ] 1001) POL ak ’ ad 113 G. C. Exu. 4 As a result of a series of discussions held with repre- sentatives of Local 134 I.B.E.W. for the purpose of for- mulating a plan for merging Local 134 Supervisory forces into the 3 level structure required by the “District Unit” plan of operation the following conclusions have been reached: PROMOTIONS I All present P.B.X. General Foremen will be promoted to District Installation Superintendents reporting to the District Plant Superintendent in the Plant Dis- trict to which they are assigned. All present Building Cable General Foremen will be promoted to District Construction Supervisors re- porting to the Division Construction Superintendent to whom they are assigned. (A) As District Installation Superintendents and District Construction Supervisors their wages and conditions of employment will not be a matter of union-management negotiations but They will not be required to discontinue their membership in the union as it is recognized that they have accumulated a vested interest in pension and insurance benefits as a result of their membership in the union. However, any allegiance they owe to the union shall not affect their judgment in the disposition of their supervisory duties. Since they will have under their supervision employees who are members of unions other than Local 134 and perhaps some with no union affiliations whatever, the company will expect the same impartial judg- ment that it demands from all Supervisory personnel. II 114 GENERAL FOREMEN The number of General Foremen under the contract will be restricted to one in each plant Division in the Chicago Area where Local 134 forces are em- loyed under the contract and one in the State Area Plant Department where Local 134 forces are em- ployed. (A) They shall be assigned to the staff of the Divi- (B) sion Supt. or the General Plant staff and their duties shall be as follows: Supervision of all apprentices, Journeymen and Foremen in the Division to which they are as- signed with respect to matters of personnel and employee relations such as: training, force adjustments, health and welfare, job safety, overtime distribution, absenteeism, contract in- terpretation, etc., by coordinating these mat- ters between the Division staff and the line or- ganization. They may be assigned to qualify job observations and other assignments not in- consistent with the provisions of the contract. It is understood that the Foremen, while re- porting directly to the District Installation Su- perintendent or District Construction Super- visor as the case may be, may consult with the General Foreman of the Division in all cases where the proper application of these matters is. in question. It is understood that future District Installa- tion Superintendents or District Construction Supervisors will be chosen at the discretion of management and not necessarily from the ranks of General Foremen. However, it is further understood that no discrimi- nation will be shown, that individual ability and qualifications will control. (C) Conditions may warrant regrading of a Gen- eral Foreman to the status of Foreman but the PORTE Ga NE? 115 Company will use every effort to maintain qualified General Foremen in that assignment. FOREMEN: III All apprentices and journeymen employees who are members of Local 134 will be directly supervised by Foremen who are active members of Local 184, and nothing in these articles is meant to infer otherwise. Tentative effective date July 1, 1954. Approved : INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS—LOCAL No. 134 /s/ Harry J. Hughes For Local Union No. 134 /s/ J. M. Boyle Vice-President—Sixth District International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Approved: ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY /8/ [Illegible] General Plant Manager Chicago Area /8/ D. L. Brown General Plant Manager—State Area 116 -T- ISMOT[OJ SB 99IZe SatzALd ayy, ‘peieyuo oynjsi9y quoueer7Ze ue Sestwo1d Tenjnur oq} JO uolje¥1episuoD UI‘FHOAATHAHL MON sdiysuoielor sefoyiwe -19Sojdwe uj Zayjoeye estre- Aeur 32g} soynds]p jo sueeul tnjaoeed Aq Zuipyjes a4} pue uoleisdo -09 snoyuouliey Zujinses jo esodind 94} 103 S313 -1ed aq} Usesijeq suo;JE[e1 yourhoydma o7e[NZe1 0} @1ISep pue ‘juauIselZy sty} Jo oinus, 24} Buy -inp Aueduiod 343.107 410m [Teys Aq} YoY Tapun pue ‘Ajaatjoedse1 ‘saefojduie yo sdnoi3 yons 03 aiqeorjdde quauifojduis jo suoTjIpuoD jo SsprepuE;s ysiiqeys® 03 a1jsep sored oy} ‘SYSHAHM pue ‘peiioeds rayeujoray," AT -aatjoedsas‘hredwiod ay} Jo saafojduia jo sdnoi3 asoy} 10y Aouede ZuluyeZreq earsnjoxe oy} SB volun ay} sezjusooe1 AueduioD 043 ‘SVAHAHM LYHL HL3SSANLIM o ,teeeeerenrony UOTU ye00'],, se Aj[enpyarpur pus ,,uowun,, oy) se AT -aAljoaT]00 0} PasIeje1 Jsyeuterey oq Avur yorym SUO}JUZIULZIO [el1}sNpu] Jo ssaiZu0D — 10qU'T JO uoljtiapez ULoliauy oy) WA pazelyse ‘SUA -¥YOM ‘IVOINLOZ1a 4O GOOHHSIHLOUT . ‘TWNOILYNUZLNI 0g JO 66€ PUES gee “STE ‘e9I ‘FEI “ON SNOINA ‘IVDO pue ,.Auedui0d,, ay} S¥ 0} PelJiejel Jayemeisy 3q Aew yous ANVYdWOD 3NOHd3Z1aL 114d = SIONITTI ay} usemjeq pues Aq 9961 ‘reqowO jo Arp Yat sly} popusure sayzingy Aqai9q pue ‘191;c010q3 aul} 0} awl} wor] pepuowls se ‘St6T ‘ysn3ny ‘jo Acp wig ey) OW! pasazua youseIZy sIqL INA WAAYDV 117 -E- *waulaasde s1y} JO Suo}s!Aoid 94} WRIA 4D1]JU0D UI yOu sI peyover qWeulser3e ay} yey} peplaoid ‘suoluy) [voo'y ayy usemjeq pesiZe OS SB yIOM 9y} USIsse [IM AuEd ~WOD oY “410M Jo JUeUIUT}sse 943 07 JOadsar YIM. SU0}UH [P90"] oy} ueemjeq IndD90 Agu yor aynds}p AUB OT}}2eS 03 Soxejiepun uojuy ey “Eg uoT}OeS “P@AOAT} SUOIUH [ed0"] 943 pue AueduroD oy3 U9eM}0q pesiZe eS|M1ey}0 SsaquN ysed 943 Uy SB UJCWSI []LM 2AOGE [ UOIJOeg U] UMOYS s¥ sdnord eefojdwa om} ay} pouSisse eq 0} jWoWsaISe S143 U} pateacd Yiom Jo uoljoIpsjin{ oq} jyuouZ ‘[0218t S1q3 Jo einus} oy} Bujanq °zZ uoyj0eg * “uliojted 03 poulerj pus otqu O18 UolU oy3 Aq peyueseider seefojduie oy} yeyM pues witoj1ed 0; paddjnbe sj Aueduiog og} yey 3° SISBq 04} UO poz0I[e pus uojaQ oy} 4M Aued “WD 43 Aq Pame}Ael oq [TJM YOM Jo yo Zuy}O"I4 ~uoo Gons ‘Zujpuezs Ajjiojyues 4M saefojduie jo Zuj11Ge1 Oy; queasid 10 *BujuN}-zred 30 ‘syjohe] OSNVS TMA INO P9j}DBIUOD Oq OF YIOM Yons J] *yno Pd}Oe1WWOD AT] TEUIOJSND MOU 8] SB YIOM SAOGe oT} 30 YONS no yo"IzUOD 07 enMIWWOO AwuI AueduIOD | OF WWewuserZe s}q} Jo einus; ey} Buying (q) *seeAojduis gons jo sdno13 aajj00ds “31 043 4q i1epunezey peuiojzed Ajjreui0jsno yAIOM O43 pus ‘joo19q yred © opeul pue ojoI0Y POYORHS SSIMOHI] «Ar» WANGXA Ul Pepnjour oie S213} SSOyM “EEE PUB OEE ‘STE “SOT “ON suO!IUy Te90"] 4q poqueseidex dno1Z oy ut Aueduiog 94} Jo Jueulpredeq weld ey} ul sseAopduis osoy} pue ‘yo ~d1e0y pied © apeu Aqoiey pus ojye10y poyorye s} Gogh «cVs, WQIYXA Ul Pepnjouy ore sayy} esoyM ‘fT “ON UolU [e007] Aq peyuesaider dno1Z oy} UI ALdWOD 44) Jo wowyItdeg jucl; sui ul ssa -fo|dWs asoy} 1]v Si8A09 quswessZe St1UL (€) *T Yor}Deg po12009 YAM, — 71UN Jo adoos We FIONLUV “syquout (¢) paaoxe 03 ou ‘porsad pazy “UI & 16 yafoid o1oads & 103 paSeBua o1¢ oum seafojduia ,,Arvioduia}3,, pue UONEINWIT Su1] Ino. “tM paseZue oie oym seefojdua ivjnge1 ‘saado}d ~W9 Jo SedAj (Z) om} aq []8Ys e1eyZ, *¢ UOI}Dag *eyejidoidde se saafojd “wa 10 eafojdua jo UONEOHISSeID IO 410M jo- GO1}D}J}SSEIO 0} S19J91 UJeIey pesn way *,,u0TZ “SOIISSEIO,, PIOM YL *AmedwioD ey; pue uolug 94} 0} siajor .,89},1ed,, prom oy} pue ‘ajzejid -oidde se‘ Auedwioo ay} 10 Wola), 9y3 03 Srajerz ‘uy “oly pasn uoygm ‘,,A318d,, prom oy, *93e} 1doidds S204 Japuez oujuj UIE 943 epnjoUy 03 UexE} 9q T[TYS Uyeley repuez euymmoseur 943 jo 28M *peplaoid Wjerey se uojun oy; Aq powasordex Afuedwog 9%} Jo seefo[duia 10 sakojdma ue ueew ««820fo]d “Ul9,,, pus ,,eeho]dme,, spiom aYJ, *z Uo}}0eg “yaweerZy S}y3 JO j1ed w opew pus 07 poyor; “78 ‘@ qx” pues y yqiyxg peyreu ‘sernpeyos dnoin e8e, 2943 uy Pepnjouy e1¥ suo} eOIzISsseTO PUB $9191) esoym juowjIEdeq yueIg $7] JO seefoid “Uld @50y} 103 AoueZe Zujuye31eq SAISNIOXe 943 s¥- Doyun e843 sezjus00ex Auedwi0g eyy, *T uo}q09g wo} Us000x7 I aTOLLUy 118 epEeU pus 079.194 poyoune .. Vr» WANYXA Uy UMOoYsS SB oq [IBYS FET.“ON UOoJUM [woo Aq pojuesaidor seefojduia 04) 0} equojidde suojjJpuoo Zuyy10M GY} JO UJEIIGO puw SOI ODUM OYT, *T WO}}0eS . go} } PUD BuyxIOA\ UTwIED PUT sozwYy Ou M Al WIOLLUV ° . ° *quemeerZy 814} JO. OXEP UO}JVI}dxe oy} 07 JOJAd poayeoer s} OB1vYOo ° “S}P 10} sonber s,uoyup, oy} Jey} ‘TOAGA\Og ‘papyA 01d :padreyos}p oq ‘uojup ey} Jo yonber u977]1M ‘aodn ‘][eys senp uoyUp AJeY} AOpue; 0} G.INT}VF JO esnvoog uojUN om} U} djys1equieu wo1s pepuedens seofojdwe (q) puv yuoweerf#y sq} JO W190} eq} JO 1epuyeurer OY} oy sonp uoyuN ATqWUOUL ZuyrINd -a1 Al reNZe1 oy} 0} Tenba yunouls UB UO;U OY} 0} srapua3 10 sfed ey sev Zuo] os Zujypueys poo Uy Jequieur B oq 0} paulsep oq ITeYS eefcidule UB (8) *Saypeoaad Ajoye}pouury Z pus T SUo}{09S JO esodind oy} 107 7y} poorde st 3° 10}}00g a - eget‘, Ame 1OYB WoweeZy 8}y3 Aopun yaourfopduse yo u0}IP . “000 8 SB Sulpuvjs pooS uy uojup, oy} Uy dyys10q “ULOUI I}Oy} UyBJUTVUL TTeYS GEE IO OFE ‘STE *S9T suojuy, [BOOT JO srequioul eUIODeq 19}jv010T} OYM JO slEquIEU OOM ‘8PHET ‘OE TEQUIZAON UO oym AueduioD 04} YIM Jueuso[dule Jo e10W 10 skep A42143 WWM -seoehoidue ITV,.°% 10}}00g “eg6T '£ AML 19Ie JUOWEDIZB syTYy Jopun JuoUT ~fojdwia Jo uo}z}puoo ¥ ‘fe Buypusvjs poods Uy FET °ON WOojU TBO] Jo s19queUl UjBWIEL pus SUOD -0q megs pet ‘ON uojug, jwoo'y Aq poyueseidox | an “ae -t : ere oy ‘Auvdwop ey} Ui quoutfojduie jo o10Ur zo sXup A114) WyA seedoydure TIy *T WoH0eS: ** fyanoeg uoyun MM @IOMLUV, . _*yaoursesZy S143 Jepan ZayyIOM eefojdue xzvynzer Aus jo syoket.10 Bupwy3-j10d Uy} WZMsexr jou TTeYs qyUowleZuerre 8}4} eT} pee128 ‘Ayrengnuz 8} I *sy9ea 7qBjo Jo poyred w pesoxe jou Treqs dno13 Aus zo pojyzed Zujuyer} OL *quewec013 Y 8]q} Uy suojs}Aord Aq pozoesze oq 30U TTEYS pousys -S8 OS OT]yM ‘pus ‘urerZ01d Sujpuyex3 B Jo yavd SB qyun ZupoyeB.req oy3 UIQ (Wd 00'S 7 “INV 00's" +£epjzq YSnory} Avpuojn) YOM WO}VTTSIST} UOHeS 0} peusjsse oq Avut (09 peeoxe 03 300) seofold -ulo JuoWIeZBUB IY JO Lequinu elquuos¥et V (0). ° : *faedu0g eyy JO UOTSTAT SoU] Bu0'T oy} JO FIOM (p) . : *susdu0p ey} pue uojun pies oy}, WeeM{eq quewoee138 10d 88 ‘G6 “ON T800'T ‘gr10eulZuq Sajzeredo Jo woyUN Jeuo}JVUIE;UT OY} JO SAOquIOU! IB OTA s100uj3 -ue Arxeuoj7e38 Aq pouroyied MOT YIOM | (0) “faedwion oy) pus SMO, O43” pres 043 JO Yous TeeMjeq quowiee128 10d se ‘ATeAT} ~oodser PET ON UOTUN T80O'T pue TJouNeD 30123810" {S1IUJV_ OY} JO Stoquieul o1B OYM SUBJQII}OO[@ pue sioyayed Aq poutzojred Mou IOAN @ . : fae -wop og} pus uojup .,s10zeredO pres SU} weeMj}eq quoweei128 10d se ‘99 *ON TBOO'T ‘UO]UN ~S19}18IS pus ,s10jB1edQ 10;BAeTA 94} JO siequeul O18 oy $10}10}8 pus sx0yeredo 10;eA0[9-107{UEl ‘S103 =gzedo 10;eA9]9 Aq poutszojred Mou 310M (es) *yuow90128 S14} U} POGAOCS 7OU BS} yI0M BZuyMoy [03 Om} ey PPIITE rOgVANy G}. YW’ VOH0ES WRN 119 re 119Q pO -@s, byceneidas QUEM BOWjoUN/ US. 4) pus Uy pellvo eq *uo}Uy PIs Jo yeenl 02 O42 IU ‘TLLm ‘WY weseldes 09 UY 1q paretepap GUOsWOS 20 “MSA EL OI JO JUep ~)8024 04)’ Bu)yoowW #/q) WU peyen(ps you JT * seeodind #)q3 403 (uedwoD ey) {q peyeFelep puw jo #aA}3 -CyWeseldal pul #10R7RTA Yons UL Paaywa -uy Asp SULIT) 40 VO}TQ [WOO] Yons }O JaBeueyy eveuysnd oq) Aq peyuedwoooe vy {tual oym (UO}}E1ap}eU0S JepUen 2ezINIU 4) @[purY 0} 802}}WUOS-qns B srequieuT Sif Worl ylodde Lew ogm) qweweeslsy S19) 0} Sa}jZ10d BO}U) [BDO] OY JO Gove Jo S@A}]BWesaidar Jo pesodwoos s} TouNCD YorUM F-L [JouN0D waists eyy Jo -#10q -WeUl Uaamjeq Bu} 1AeU! B YE 81}}e8 07 ape oq 11M wens ue ‘parsnfpe snyy you 7] *@OUBAa}IZ OY) JO Wades Jaye s fep (¢) @A13 UTyI}M UO}s}Oep B repel pus SouvrAasy1B ay) JO yyeoer sae skep Buy -4410M (Z) OM) ULYITM OANEWUeSeIder UOJUp ayd YIM YoU []BYs OYM ‘slJa;BUI Yons eTpuey 03 Auedwiog oy} Aq poyeu8}sep euo -9Wl0s JO JeBeuEW. ay8j1dordde ay} yA peoe|d oq [1eys pue aAljeyueseide1 uojuy ayi Aq uojsjAredns jo seas, o78}1do1d -de Zujpesaoons oy) yyydn uayxe, eq ua UPYS 3} ‘pe]}788 you s! eouBAg}IZ 04} JI *10s}Ai1edng em] 3sI}J 10430 10 ‘wewaIOT S1y 0} SOUBAD!IZ 94} BuT1qG WI]J ITBYS PxBMe}S S}y 10 seAo|dWIa oY TL ‘ce dng *% day *T dow “AIOLLUV 814) Ul YII0; Jos empecs0id oy1 0} Buypr0008 pesseooid oq {1848 $19}2}8W Yons ‘readde oyndsip 10 souBAa!12 19430 Aue pmoys so ‘yuowse1Zy syy}.jo suojstsord tt ao en110; 04) Jo Aue jo woud 320 ao}je08d 2078} OY) Buypseserz vow) oy, pus Luedwo) om Woenjzeq O8}10 seCUsIe;j}p PIhoys *T GO}}OeS . + @IMpecoerd sous10;V0D pus eounasyzD _* MAXX TOLLE, 120 cy *BOENVO TET}O TOF COMSqE OTGVUOS “BOI 10 ‘eOUSs Ts SsOUO}S TeyUEPjoU} ‘AEpi[oY ¥ wo eouesqe JO} OpeUl.Oq TI}M Uo}ONpep Aed on °9 *pojred eyqeuosvex 8 uyqy Avd qa 370 Gur} JO yuNoUTS yueTeAynbe uv 7uvI3 0} OT “]889J PeLep}suoo Jou ST yf WwYY ‘pepyaoud ‘yueUL -uB}see Ay ep [eu jo} Jo J[Vq-eUo specdoxs 20 sTenbe eul]}.10A0 Yons esto Jeqye Uj} UeyM .° sfep 10q}0 uo 10 Avpy1om pemmpeqos A[TeuLIOU B TOTS WO ZujIIND00 YIOM GUNjZIGAO pez}Iog, * “ne 10; Avd Jo O78I OFSeq OUTS; WWB}V.IIS ION Ww. Pred oq Treqe uowez0d pus Usuler0y Tereuen *g “sep (c) oaty wey} s8oq Jo ported w sof epwat oq TIA UeuTELO, [w1eUsH se yuoUTZTOddY ON *y- NAWIUOT GNV NENAHOT TVHAINID _ Od SNOLLIGNOO ONDIYOM : al *euop O TIvYys FIOM oy} TOTYM Gy Teureur oq} ZayAyjoeds uroxz 10 oury; Aue ye yIOM = ccicsinn Sacer een been oe TeSys STG} Inq ‘UeMEIOT [e1EUADH ¥ JO woyerazedns ©} Jepun oq TT}A PET “ON oyun Teoo'T Aq pozues. -eeidex seoyjusidds pus uvwiAemmof *uvmerog ° NOISIAUZaNS = vuwmer0g eTq¥D Supping WpUIEIOT WOWATESU “XA @ zeqamy dnoip ese, usmerog Ter6emeH 1 reqsiy dnosp eden ¥ uaMxt *emmpecord Sut Uy wBreq U] WeT} Jeserdexr 0} pozj1oyNE ors OYM yeouuosred oy ZujpavZer peurroyuy 10430 youve desy Treqs uoyun oq; pus Ameduiod ey °*4 w0}005° “smog Zuyy10M pemmpeyos Zujmp Aed zo. @S0] NOAM SOA}}BJUeSoIdor JuouIEZeuE A Yi Tey 100 0} UOJUN oy} Buyjueserdex seokojdwe yyur10d 0} seeds Auedui0g eq) ‘Ajdde Avur se u0jze19; ~39] Yons pus prvog ‘suojyBjey Toqe'T [euojzeN on} 90 suo};eINZoy pus somy 07 yefqng *g wo}}00g *SUO}JEI}SCAU} YONS U} UO|UN Og} TWA o7e.redo0o 03 600188 pus ‘yWepyoo’ xO eouEAgjIZ Aue Zujpanoxz “INE S9OUBISUNI.IZO OT} 978S}SOAUT 0} UOJ OT} JO we OY} Sezjuso0ex Auvdui0D eyL °S 10}300g *eS8O OY} 02 USjsse Avu uO}UN ON} owe OATTeIUeSeIdex ETO Adv XO ‘su0}}8}}0Z0N Teu}3}.10 oT} perpuvy oy OATyeWUOSeIdex UOTUA ¥.JO- @oueseid 94} Uy} yWeoxe peajoauy seeAoTduie 10 80 ~Ao[dute oy} Wi}A.1073BUI OY} SSHOSTP T{}A OAljzeRUEs -e1dex Amedwiog ou ‘uojup eq Aq. Avedu0D 04} 93 ae itl cae eals AVYV *P 10}7098 . *prooex Aued -mul0D jo JOVUL B OIV 039109} JUBAGTOI &}O¥l O43 JI GASP OST UTI XO *permndoo ysey Jo pouyeidu0o @OUGIINDOO IO UO}}OU ON} ASE Shep TEpusTES OF UlqIA4 peyweserd ssetun uojup x0 Auedui0o eg} Aq PeLEP}sUoo Od T[eYs SoUBAS}IZ ON *E 10}}00g *yuoUIEOIBY BIT} JO ITAXX SLHAV UT 10; pepjaord BB WOHw.IZ}GIB 07 ‘AzIed rote Jo ysenbexr og} 3 ‘Buy y1M Uy peyyuqns eq TTeys ‘pepyAoczd erojoquy “8104 JeUTEU Og} U] UOJUN, oY} pus AueduI0D ey} JO SOA}JEJUeSeIdexr O43 Aq JO pesods}p ATj10;08j8];09 Oq JOUUBS YOTGM yUSWMIEAIZY sSTy} JO suO}s}AoId 04} JO wO}eo}Tdde 10 uo}ye}eId10;0; JO Wo};senb 0} 03 podser WIA eOUBAG]IZ Auy °*Z 0}}00g + *@PUBAS]IZ OY 917308 0} ximoqye “¢ doxg uy 0} porzesex soqzz0d 121 St *POFIOA YTYS AeMFor sep 64} JO OU}3 Buy}3]nb weg} z0je, you woAIZ eq Tleys 30M sep JTeY A9qj}O [Te Jo wO}zBOITIION *er0joq AvpjrzT ey} Uo ou}} 30433;nb Tey} 1038] Jou uaA]Z oq TTBYS Y10A\ Buju0UW ABp.nyeg jo UO}BOIWION °¢ *eS}M10T}0 pee138 ATTenynur eq ernjny oy} uy Avur pus ueeq SBy SB 3daoxe ‘seeAo[dwio Tenpyaypuy ey puv uvut “9107 [B1euaH ey} Uaemjaq uodn peor3e ATTennu SWI} BIB PUB 1EzB] JJO Way, Oq [TM OUNy} Yons *Pex1O0A\ ZayaI0W ABp.njzes oy} Jo soUBAPL UT yo Aep JTBY-9U yULIEd you saop puol YIOM OY} eq} JWEAG OG} Ul *jJO Uaye, oq TTeYs GAysn[oUT ‘Aepy1y 07 Avpuow ueemjeq Aep xTeq euo *payI0M eq 03 S| Buy “WOW AEpnyeg B YOH4A UZ Yoo oy} Buying °*Z *eynzejs olquoyidde sae Aq poxzynb “Or ore syuouted umjword ssetun ety} 7q3}eI39 38 pyed q [TeYs UooU OOZT 03 “WV 00:8 Woz 3AM Zuyurour Avp.mjyes *uoou 0O:ZT 03 “INV 00:8” woz Lepmzeg uo yI0M 07 seafotdule Jo zequnu U}8j109 B eJeUB}sep Avur Amedu0D on} yey} yWeoxe *YIOM 6,YOOM IBTNZr Oy} Oq TTeYs ‘eAysnou; *ABp “11d 03 ABpuoyy “I'd 00'S PUE “INV 0078 TeEMjoq Peuoyoer yove sinoy qYZje Jo skp OAT *T SSIOLLNGUddV GNV NAWAANUNOL wOd SNOILIGNOD ONDIOM *uvurfomrnof @ qyTM Aueduioo uy peAojdue eq ATuo 1Teys eo}juerdds uy *qof euo Aue uo usuifournof yows 0} eoyjuerdds UO UY} G1OUI O9q jou [[eYs 91043 pus ‘pofojdue ueurfeumof anoy yore 0} ouo UBq} O10U 9q jou Tlvys wourfeurnof 03 seojjuordds jo oy,¥1 oY L NAIWAGNUNOL OL SAOLLNAWddV dO O1LVU bP 996T '6 1040790 OA}}00;; 74 * = oS we *uo} VU} WIvXS s,ceufeu.nof ¥ sessed eq TUN Yeem zed 0¢°,ZT$ pred eq TH UojUN oY} zo pxvog Bujgywexg oy} e10joq wojyeujurexe $,UeUur ~Aoumof v ssed 0} styey oyM pus «reek qyINoy syy PeALES Zajavy oojjueIdde uv Jo oyvr Fem ouL vA 09°L2T °. LeYVorey TL OS'S2t ve WIp—O0}AX08 Jo EY]UOU x18 puopeg oo°SsTr 180k T}p—eo}A108 JO syjuoU X18 1821},5 00°60T «eek pxrg—sojar0es Jo sqWOU xX}s puooeg: OS*80T — AvOA PIG—CdJArT0S Jo SJUOUT x}8 4911.5 00°26 «© AvOA puz—oojAr0s JO SYMOUL MOF PAY, 00°26 9 rvok puz—eo}Ar0s Jo syyuoU nox puooeg 00°06 aIvoek puz—eojares JO sqyUOUL INOJ 39.145 00°88 TBOA 48T—00}AI08 JO sqyWOW x19 puocceg 09's $ TBO {ST —OdJAI0B JO SY;UOUT X48 48.152 oo] }UeI1ddy uo}EITeISUT “xg eojjuarddy o1qvo Supping % JoquMN dnozp ese ; *yoom red ; » wemfeumor A . JOITESUT “Xa Os"6sT$ wy Jeojids erqeD Iuipyng ) wewelqep Zuipyng € tequmn dnozp O2BA\ * V LIGIHxg 122 LY 9961 “6 20qQ0I20 SANIONT - 00°St 9 0S 8ST 0S °StT 000 ® 0S "SdT Os “Stt 00°6 9 os "Sct OS "Ozt 0s'9 9 OS ‘921 00°02T 00's 9 00 °0zt 00°R1t oss r 00°SIt OS “90t- 00°S 9 0s °90T 0s "96 00° 9 0s "96 05 "08 os*zs 9 os "06s .08'ses ba | . Tealequy . Tease Wey = SYR oL mod ye yuvoary - , ¢ MOOM OS SETS ~ SUMO I SSID OFA WENUTPLENE 00°st 9 05 “09T Os "LT 05 Ot ry OS "LOT 00°L6T oss 9 00°LET 0S LET 00°. 9 OS "Lat Os ‘Ost Os" > 0S “OZ 00°STT oss ® 00 "SIT 0S “LOT 00's 9. 0S LOT os "l6 00° ® 0S ‘16 os "sé . 00°s 9 os "sé 03 "06 os'ss 9 os ‘06s , - O5"ses “ Teaseyuy qoeg = TBAIORUT oL wold ye yrowy syVO;T : ° ROOM 09 °O9TS ~ SUMOL | SHVID STE UNUTTXERY . seyeoL, syeklorIy seuBjesy TOL poe yunIL BIe1D sopddng 3129817 seyazedsig Fon L zeyszeds}q BOR INTSUOD 44a1D THNENNS ITD woyomnsysv0D aeudjesy wei 20WWeg azojysedsuy yNpUCD Wewsyesg Joes" UEMEdTAIEg SUONETUNUTTIOD uEullemod OeWeoVEUEW EE suO}EOUNUMOD aeydes30;04d . Weasel eIgeD WAVID Souwusqurene azeonds 1q8D Jeyoyedsid BONTITE SUT UrwavuTuSTE youdmdy SuTpINg 1 sequin dnozp eFem @ LIGIHXS 1a *uew uOojUN-UudU TA Gof Aqe uo HIOM 07 WO}U [BOOT 94} JO B10q -wieul oxjnbex 03 30u soo18e AmedwmoD eyL *9 *su0}} + =x0do usqingns 07 pouSjsse AjrvMBexr soofojdue. JO} SOOUBMOTIE UO}IEIIOdsqeI} PUB svOIE 2uq7104 01 SujpreZex joojyo Uy Sujpuvysrepun yuerInd oq} JO suO}s}AoId OY} JO JIOSUITY [}BAB 0} 300TO ‘kaed +Ul0D ey} JO JUSSMOO OY} IA pus ‘esuedxe 10};3 -8}10dsUB1} BIZXO PUB OUI}} [OABI} YONS JO NojT Uy ‘eur eofodwe ey} ‘uojjeinp shep BuyyIOM @Aq3 “noesweo Om] UY} OIOUT Jo s} yuoUTU} seu Arv10d | 9Ur9} Oy} Mey *perrnoUy esuedxe u0};8710dsuU¥13 oy1qnd w1jzxe Joy pesinquijer oq []}M pue UINjer pure uo}}Boo] Gof og} 0} BIFWIT AIO OY} UOIZ OLLITE Auedwog uo JeAvr} [THM *Bery,-feyY OpysjNo yIOM 0} pousjsse ATjrex0duie} ueym su0}jw10edO 0380 “TED 043 0} pouSjsse ATrumBexr soohoidurg °¢ "ATX OPV OF .PepysAoid sv ydooxe ‘S[VOUL OJ UO}FS}ULI9j}U} ATao WA YIYs you og} YBnory? penuyWWoo Ss} yI0M usyA '*9*} ‘@Ur}ZIOAO SHONU}UOS Joy pus ‘sXupung UO EOP YIOM JIB AOF OBTS “jJTeY-OUO pus OUT} JO O7ex OY} 7W TOZ Pred oq TTeYe sINOY Bu)x10M IBINGe1 Oy} JO SSEOXS U} POYIOM OW]? [IV “PF BOVE LI oe Maximum Rate Class V1 Towns - $147.00 Week i ss ij Maximum Rate Class III Towns - $157.00 Week Trom $82.50 4.00 88,00 90. 60 106.60 | 114. 60 121,00 132.00 Each gadseces Amount at Each Interval = Effective October 9, 1966 gegeeeeas , A | s cvccvece s t Seccccco 8 Zé evceccecce & = z = 3: 7 : E seeeeseS E , s8gessss = | ssseaesse 8*S25855 3 “ gséseeuz 3 = S22SSaas5 gE OSSASS a. | g 822883328 ae S8288338 ! § 28288838 & Z8eesras ° Z3seeres 4 §& ezegses¢ Effective October 9, 1966 a vv 124 * jlmwe flags ime. f a , 40 i | lem Hee on I } 2228228 i 2223223 i eseeasee 8 F b scdceead 9 © sidsess é « y * geegssd og * getccns og ° SFSRS88S | orn oe : Fama Dogme Tonge j al i { seegaaezs i seeaeace — yee y OY a ae oe sasacases, 2 sgagease 2 SISRERERS j * ssdasade * i . . yumm | ma i rs £s es 9961 “6 3eQ0WO PAT ANT 96t ‘6 20Q0120 eAN ONE 0s'9 r 00°etr OS "IEE 00°L 9 OS “Tet OS "LIT Osh 9 OS "LIT 00 °OIT 00'S ry 00°OIT 00°S6 . Ose 9 00°s6 « 0S "16 oo'¢ 9 0S "16 0s ‘88 co z$ 9 05 “88s Os 'r8S “unt “yearaey Yorg Tearazuy oL woi1z ye wunowy SYWUONY HOM 00 'BEL$ — SUMOL DI SSC[D SFY UMUjxeyy os*> 9 00 ‘OFT 0S "Set 00°6 9 OS "set 0S *92T 059 9 0S "9z1 00 °0z1 00°8 9 00 "OzT 00°SIT 0s"s 9 00°ett 0S "901 00°S 9 0S "901 0S 96 00°¢ r) 05 "96 0S 06 Ye) os ‘2s 9 06 '06$ os "ses “ort N Yeasew] Yours yeazauy * eL worms ye ynouy SYN - . OPAL OO "OPIS - SUMOL I] SSEID SVUY UNECE os"» 9 OS "thE 00 "LeT 0s'6 9 00°LCT OS “Lt. 00°L r) OS "Let 0s “Ozt , 0S"L 9 0s ‘O2T 00°CIt 08's r) 00 "SIT 0S °LOL -00°S r 0S "LOT 0S °L6 4 9 03°46 0s "c6 9 0s "s6 05°06 00°1t 9 00°et “tt os ‘zt 8 03 ‘06s 9°ses as § os"8 8 00°TZt of hit 00°8 r) OS "PIT 0S “901 ey Teareqcy, oL mong 00't 9 0s *90r OS "06 ; 5 STBOPT . o's r 0S "06 00°88 ; ognsd o 9 00°88 * 00°68 WOU 08°THTE ~ SUMOL I CS¥ID OFM EDEIPINIK oss 9 o0"Fes os'zes | “Un seps0sey WU weutrearred Laverr Yeareyoy yeg | THA}, oL word SOWTOION . ‘ uvasyeg yw ynowy SYUO)Y e . . & equmy dn020 aPeat ~ 429A, 00°SPTS = SUAOL IA SSEID QYEN TUNWTXENY ee e ¢ uiamx ea | sg Ss 996T “6 20Q0190 eaNreNg 8261 “6 20Q0;90 sanreng sod) ose so: 8 SS ao 8 fob OR —— on 3 0630COSS OBS ORM 0O°STTS = SUMOL AT = IT SeTID ope emIprETy os"te e coves ses =| CU : Teareyr yore = yevenq OL worg 3030 (O8Hoge see Bice 03'9 . 00°SIE 09 °90T WOM 09°LSTS - ORAOY TA soETD ep REECE, ot H oes, ono © OS's “8 08 "08s Os = UE Os"» ® os"ver * 00 "orr Sey eon cot H o0"eot cose, WL 00 SETS - SuROL TT SIND oY MEET a Hf * weve. a : pee —_ co'zs ° 0s "ead " ont we f fF #. # wae Gor oe 0o"p ° Os"us 0s "66 WO OF METS - SUMOL A SSTLD ORE UMETTERE / oe tt H os 088 oe mR ; mez. ne et a oot H o0-0tt cose WOM, OF FETS - PUROL ] SeUTD CE EMEP, sy ° 8. . sores axe ‘meted oo"ss . Os “ess Os "ses “IK Ren weweurery Tae rom user oz wanna ¥ sequmy dnozy ee . POM 00°RETE = SuROL AI SeMLD eR EEEETTER = @ LiGIRxa — . 127 B96 “6 2299290 eanreg 00°8 9 00" 00°S 9 00 ‘OI 00°ss e ost ’ 00 "sé os"t¢ 00't 9 os "t¢ os"ee 00°z$ ¥ 0s ‘ee$ Os'res . TUE TeAraquy gyorg Tearequy . oL wor e ye qunoury SNOT APPA 00 BITE ~ SUMOL AT = DT SeetD eyey emaryeeyy 00°6 . 0O"TtE 0O°SIT os's ’ 00°ETT OS "sot a > aS 00°C 9 h Os zs ® 03 068 os"ses “a Teale] Wey easeqy oL org Wymomy =» Nu 3PM 00°ITTS - SUMOL TT SSUTD eTRY UMETPARY os"6 Y OS "tzt 00°Stt os"s . 00°SIT 0S "LOT 00°S y 0S “LOT 03°26 00° ro 0s "46 4 = 00's ¥ 0s "6 . os “2s 3 os "06s os "set Tt Tease] yor Teareaquy OL worg yw wrowy wyoN APA OS "ZATG = SUAS J SEELD ayey conn PETE, SOYST AL TIEAL UBarMNTLs UCUTyDOIS 22)8aL syekjorpely eonuenddy erm aeaned Sr] 2ad!Idy eoQuenddy § sequiny doug atny @ LIQHXxa 9S 096T ‘6 seqQ0;90 eanoeny ost e° covert 0S ‘908 00°D 9 08 *90t 03°08 oe H coe oe. oa'ts . co'ves Os "ses Teaser yey reareqny oz ° wong a eg s WOM 00°STTS = SUROL LA SNTTD ep MRETENRY 0s*e on 0o°sst os‘err 09"s . . Os ert 00°e0r 00°9 ° 00 °¢0T 00°66 os"» . 00°66 0396 * 00'S e. 03 "¥6 0s "88 00% ry os ees os*es Tearewr Weg yearequr oL mors 996T ‘6 229970 CANINA 9961 “6 20q0120 SANIATTE 4 o's . oo*cIt 05 ‘90t “unt oo“0zt eee H o-o8, oe co : o0-0Et 00-2 oz * 8 0088 00"¥8 o's . ome pany ost r oo'ses oes 0 UL . . oo H 05°96 05°06 Teaser weg | peaseey oL wos 0s‘tt r 0s 06s os "set wt qe ynoury sNv0Km yee er, | TNL L wmosg WOH OO'ETIS ~ SUMOL TA SEBLD SIY UMETTE ye ynouy THO ROOM ry wena oss r Os °LIt 00°GOt _ s00$0CO SS OSS weutseaned WOrT 00° 9 05°96 05 88 Trounpowg 0o°z$ 9 Os ees os ves “om Teasawy yorg = TeAs equ] L mosg ASNOH ONILNMNILSIC , ve ynowy syle SIONT'T'lt - ODVOUID LSAM HI AINO ZIGYOTIddV 41104118 7/4 O5°LIIS ~ SUMOL A ESTID SFEY WInWPKTE { LISiHXa | 19 09 | 9961 ‘6 2090190 sanrany 896T ‘6 20qM20 sanoenZ | 0s"s ry 00°vIt 0s "Bor 00°s r 03 "80r 0586 0s"¢ 9 0s 86 05°16 00°s 9 03°16 0S ea 00'ss 9 os"ses Osss ° “UE Teer wry 8 YeAreeT oL worg Te yooury SF TDO7R “39008 0O°VIES - suaoy, A - I seNtD ory Up os's ° 00°8It 0s "orr 0s°s 9 05 °Ort 00°s0r 00°s 9 00°S0r 00°00T Ee ns :.s ‘ "60 00°10t , | = os H oo°108 corse oss © 0s oss os'ses UE 0s"z r 00'c6 \ 00° 9 05 06 ose Rar yee 8 yesrepy oL worg ot ® 0s ‘18 00°98 Te pinoy ae 00°Z 6 00°98 00°" oI 9 00 "ses Os *zes af 39M 00°R1I$ - SUMO TI seed erry cm Tease] yey | TWALaNT OL morg nowy NUK o's o 06°6It 0o°ttr ™ akcalnsisimeuea 3 § gH gw | PPM 06 6OI$ - PUMOL IA SEEID os H 90°19 ons oore 9 03°66 09°08 | ess r 00°CIt os 408 on'zs -9 0s "08$ oss 380=s "Ua 00's 9 0S °LOT y ; 9 0S ‘16 05°46 Veazey yez = yeazonq oL morg ss 9 0s"¥6 on we ymoay at | ots - ones oss | UK PPL 06 °SIT$ - SuROL 1 See1D HEY UMEIKHTE Tease] yorg ema oL wosg " yaosy SY VON Urmadurep AON 00°LIIS - SUMOL A SHMID PTY UMUTPCESY ” @ tequny dnorp odie, ¢ ueexs ti-@ tt-a cg £9 9961 “6 29Q>}°E0 BARDOT 00°% 9 00°sor 00 "sor 0s" r) 00°Cot 0s ‘86 ost * os*s6 os*té 00°S 9 0s"t6 03°88 00°ss 8 os “eet ostes = “UU . Terror qowy = Tearequy oy morg qe ynouwy SHUM ° 399M 00°SOTS - SUMOL Al ~ II SeeTD Srey Emap 00"s 8 OS *LoT 0S *v0T os" 9 os “bo 00 00t os"¢ 9 00°00r > ose6 $ oo'e ry 0s "98 0s ‘06 = os'ts 9 0S “06$ os'ses “ULE kml . os"s r) 00°00T 09°96 nem a oe H ose osu wimey: | SRO ios es" 00"8 H 00-08 co-ve 3904 06°LOIE - suacd, 1 eveI> emmy mye os"1s ° 00°88 os'zes UE os*s g 00°60T 0s "Sot Tessa ye = RAL IOT oL wos ss . enone 6 ‘sot ys qunoury SqIOOFE * os 8 o9"t0r p Bes Os* "6 3AM 00 “OOT$ ~ SUMOY, IA S901D Sey EMaprE NE pe 4 o's O58 os*z$ r 05 “06¢ Osseo UM 00°% 9 00°40T 00°z0r quacees wen 6 nit 00°S r) 00 °ZOT 00°16 pope ha Teareqy L ak 00°s 9 0016 00°16 symOTY 4 00°T ae oo'es H 0s ‘ees Os'ssS$ 0 OW : PMA 00°G01$ = SUMOL 1 OStLD Fey EMUPEK Teasawy yey eA ATT oL mols supers sanding 78 wnouy STUCK — uvwmes}ueg Supprm 5A 00 HOLE = SUMOY, A vseID OFeY UMUTPKTIE L zequingy Gnozp eBey @ Liang 131 9961 “6 2eqaPO eanrIEDT 0o"s . 00°66 Os ow 00"s fe 00°96 ud os"t a 00°t6 esse 00's e 05°68 os-18 sr es 2 0o°s 7 os "1s 9 00'r8$ cs-zat Teeny gory Teszejuz oL worg 78 yowy syUO;T 0s * 3 00°TOT esos 0o°s 9 05°96 05 "0s so'ts 9 os "06$ er] Teasew) yorg Teazawy oL wosg ye yunoury Stroy 2PM OO 1OTS = SUMOL A SEU] O)°y UeEprER 8961 “6 20Q0;90 sanoeng 00°9 a 0S "Tot ose os*s os os*16 00°86 oe 4 00°96 00°16 * bi 9 0o"r6 os "s9 oe ® os ‘ees 05 "n6S Teaser] ey Tearepq os wong PMOMy = =—_S YVONNE 29948 06 °101$ - SURAT AT - I eweID eyeY MEET 8 a 9 00"ses Os “seg Raver weg wep oL morg BW ymowy eqHo, PO 06 "SOTS - SUMO 11 SseID Oey mDTXERY o's ‘9 00°s0t 00°008 0o's 9 00°008 : 00°18 00°> 9 00°t6 ets ou ® oo°tes os "ses ramp | oL wo2g Romy syjOR PPM 00°SOTS - SuROL } estiD ary wnUIpREI_ JevEs|D wewdmby 8 Jequiny dno15 e3em LIGUIXZ “Um. “CIM 9905 “8 29q7RO CARPET XK. 9961 ‘6 seqn20 eanoaya awit fe Pe ‘ oS Sr + eS e* ee oe 08°t 9 00°08 0s"e8 00°s¢ 9 0s “Bes Os'res = "UNE eye Yassew) yorg — TeATONTY oL wong ee Twewy = BYON L 2 PYM 05 866 - UROL A ETD oTRY UMUDprEYE ; 2 £ mm KA 00°28 9 05°068 OSes 86 UE an ee ae oy molg : Z Rynmy =H pt ; + 79048 00°S6$ = MUAOY, AI~ I SeTID o7eg WPCA ac) al 00's ® 00°tot 00°96 50's 9 00°06 00't6 0st ® 0086s os'ses UR _ A Teron] yey = TeATOWUT oL mor - TRMUy =H PPM 00°1018 = SURO 1 SEND oFey EMMETTE | s 0s°s ° 0s"t0T 00°18 ’ 00°% 9 00°18 00°88 ini 2 os't¢ r) 00's6¢ os'ses OM 4 H 00°88 5°69 Tearewy yor Tease 01 oz * wong 00's 8 eS KJ “7 7 pnowy STTVOSY 08's 9 x +2." 00 8 00°98 co"ve “f% ‘ PM 0S °SOT$ - SUMOL, I BETID OTM Ua;KeDy oL wos a , JOqSTM MOPOLA rh a 2020977 : + Meqpoyeng Supima 90M 09°96S - SUNOL IA ¥ETID OF WIMEPCERE B-sequmy Gno1p oFem 9 UGH 133 69 998 ‘6 209090 atnoong , “ide om hey 00°01 9 08"¢or 05's ee, 00°> , 08°88 03°68 y,. - 08°S ® 0s "68 os"¥8 We, 00°% , 05-8 ste Aig, ot s 00°08 oa a 00°38 ry 03°828 oss = UE % Tease yomE — yRATe HUT ox woe Teumowy = aqyoo PU 05 °SOTS - euaoL 3 esmD opey were 08°03 . 00 "Sor 05 "v6 00°8 r) os'98 on'se 05's ry os "ee 0s "te a 00° ry 03°88 oss 00°s + 03°08 on'8L* 0018 . 05°88 Css wm Teasovo] Wry yease yy oL wos RRpNMay = MOON 31D swewessmasig L2pung ed ee Jaydestoung 391) Cope Tsyy faery WIID Hg Weld epsocey eafordury “a W819 29pso e21339g WD WO PEW Be cs WD CrjA10g WD 02WO esweg en, Py Ce 9T soquinyy dnosr oem, 69 9961 ‘6 209790 eanoeny , Be, be ay ” Si ‘hig i The 008 ¥ Os *eLe eT) Rant wey eurepT morg Tyowy = BOR - . WPM 08016 - eusoY, A sem eye mDEpA ors ’ Cy! 2) Te wert weg —eareyor oy mong PPM OF "LLS ~ SUMOL AT TI = 1 eeeID oymy UIprET 40g 82190 _ OF sequny drop afey, @ Lionxa : 134 3 3 segsaeass : % 38 : i daddies 8 ii : . : : woeoovces efei & ' EERE 4 2 S8888%2s a 6 2 3 | sd grrrerens 3 : 938888888 : } fereedssd ee ee aah (2 FH egesegs ii gges38 py i = FH -~ - E bay , 3838888 segees 3 & gcrseés | B gersse i ‘4 i § decease eet ‘ Effective October 9, 1966 1 F Eifective October 9, 1966 79 & 3 135 i sais a Months Interval Daxtsem Rate Clase 4 Towns - $69.00 Week To $71, 771. $3. 8. a , é , ae 4 ae #4 . se, “4 é an b aie aca , oe & a + Bifegtive October 9, 1068 HG 4 3 H i : Vt bh te 1 i 2233 ! 2esss i 2338s os 3 8 a & gsad i ry gesas j é geaee Pd 2 | i j i tiga Tage dy pon UE bee regener SL 9O6T “6 20qQ0:20 eanoeng 00°.” at 00°se 00°st 00's 8 00°SL 00°9L o'r 6 00°OL ost. 00°18 r) os"tLs os 0 UE Feseyy yey reareuz oL wang ymowy - FHL . * $OOM U0'S8S = SUROL » O8TID ORY WRETER o's st 00°ss ow ‘00"s bi os"ts esas ost . ost. eo°ts 00°18 ® 00°rLs , ees . wR Teor] yore = uA reqUT oL wmorg wymowy + eyo WOM 0088S - SUMOL ¢ SETS CRE WEEE © os ® 0o°ss Os se wal 00's ® 0s se oo'ss be 00°18 6 ose ss | UNE i OL worg * ye yonoury sqRHO;, WOM 00°C6S - UROL F est]D ORY EMEA 00". - 0o"se oo°Le o's s our oo°ss os't 7 0o°se os"18 00°t$ ® _ 0818s ost1s “ORE Teareny weg = Peder oL wor . - e wk, . CHD TL e2v0pucdseiz0y Oe PNM Hs + ywidkL-y201D *° sowURL Wd WD syrodey Supe 9T Jequmyy dros ees @ LIGINXZ wh 996T "6 20q0 SANDMRT os". w os'os , 00°68 oss » 00°68 os "98 00's ® os ‘9 0508 0s"t 7 08°08 00°6L a re + eo bod 6 é 00°rs 9 0s "sis het | Teaew] Gore TeareyeT oL mors ye yuowy equcnt : OOM 0596S - OTeY UEDTTPKE TE - WAL ePedg "+ 209BL s9p29 sending Daa Nuedeg | SSOOR ONILNGTIISIa SIONITII - OOVOIND ISAM NI A'INO BIGVOITAAV BWIA @ LIGINXa at-d te Pes Maxturum Rate per boar a YY = 2.97) 86L8T) =6L6TS Li Bullding Service Attendant Leader 2,07 137 : s2eae Berer 4 ___ileclivp October 9, 1966 e " Bfective October 9, 1066 * 76 138 7 : fubti Hut 7 rT “till lh tht 6 Sig & { ae he Die 4 re 3 Eitecttte October 9, tat ‘a 1 wl i} ie ad re ie abt il. i ne 7 it dat i tis. i. i see Elk Grove Hemowood [ote A dfs aa 36a “Athist HIB) 139 wl oat oad ig r "aay fagt Bt Mid ht i j Elfective October 9, 1966 140 G. C. Exu. 11 CHECK LIST FOR HANDLING GRIEVANCES It will be well to bear in mind that sometimes prob- lems can be solved before they become grievances by pre- dicting what reaction might be anticipated in a given situation. By explaining the reasons for the action, sell- ing the fairness of the decision and trying to get the employee to understand why, the cause for a grievance may be eliminated. When a grievance is presented, here are some ideas on suggested procedure and discussion which may be help- ful: 1. Hear the Grievance Let the grievant talk. Don’t interrupt, except to ask clarifying questions. Give him the courtesy of a fair hearing. Keep your temper. Make notes for further reference. Find out all you can about the problem. Determine, through discussion, if there is an under- lying cause for the grievance which does not ap- pear on the surface. If the grievant does not refer to it, be sure to ask what part of the Agreement is alleged to have been violated. Draw out all facts the grievant can give about the complaint. 2. Decide whether you can give your answer now or whether you should postpone your decision until you have had more time to consider. If you are sure of your decision, give the answer now. If you allow the grievance back down grace- fully. See no. 5. A Explain why you must deny the grievance. If the grievant is not satisfied, and says he’ll ap- peal it, acknowledge that that is his privilege under the Agreement. Give your supervisor all the facts, so he can be ready for the appeal, if it is processed. 141 142 G. C. Exu. 12 UNION AND PERSONNEL PROBLEMS It would be worthwhile to consider what we might do to help field supervision who are confronted with Union and personnel problems. This opinion is prompted by personnel cases, grievances, and even arbitration cases which have occurred in the past year or more. Perhaps a clearer understanding of field supervision’s role as members of management, and a knowledge of techniques and personnel consideration would help make them feel more secure and effective in their day-to-day personnel operations. It is realized that most personnel cases are detected and resolved. However, there is some evidence that others are identified but tolerated, either covered up by sympa- thetic but misguided supervisors, or else allowed to exist because they are recognized as problems of long standing and their solution seems too difficult to achieve. Perhaps where the latter situation prevails, field people ~ are unduly influenced by similar cases where corrective measures may have been attempted or taken; but in the events which followed, the employee was reinstated be- cause of facts or data which, later uncovered, placed management in an untenable position. Where reversals have taken place and those who were directly concerned with. the initial action were not later acquainted with the reasons for reversal, we may have unwittingly created additional problems within our own management ranks. To illustrate these points we have cases where: 1. Employee was dismissed for some infringement of Company policy, but later reinstated with or without a service break. _ 2. Disciplinary action taken, but later overruled where other controlling factors were introduced at a later date which negated the justification for the penalty inflected. Bo a EE a RS er Bae Bard 143 8. Action taken but not supported by higher levels which resulted in “burying” the case thereby conditioning a “to hell with it” attitude on similar situations in the future. Where failure to follow through was a factor, it may have been caused by a lack of understanding of manage- ment’s responsibilities and prerogatives, a fear of in- volvement with the Union, etc. After the identification of a personnel problem, it is es- sential that we build up a case step by stép to insure a satisfactory conclusion, a correction of weaknesses or faults, or a separation ‘from the payroll—other measures having failed. In processing these cases it is imperative and essential that: (a) We get all the facts. This does not presuppose that a statement or allegation by a management person is in itself a fact. Allegations must and should be supported by something more than an individual’s opinion or judg- ment. (b) We must consider all the facts, not only those which support the action we desire to take. Mitigating circumstances not brought out, or factual data deliber- ately withheld but introduced later, places management in a embarrassing position, causes it to lose prestige while at the same time enhances the status of the Union in the eyes of its membership. The Union’s basic func- tion is to defend its people, and we recognize that this is a legitimate objective. However, we should not build up the Union’s image through our own inept handling of such cases. (ec) Disciplinary action must be taken-where it is war- ranted but only after sober consideration has been given. It is difficult to completely eliminate emotions, but We must all be aware that emotions unchecked precipitate actions and decisions which may later be found to be improper. In all instances we must take time out to reflect on all facets of ‘the problem. There are no instances where we should summarily discharge people. In an extreme case we can even go to the extent of having people physically : . — . 144 removed from the premises. We can best maintain our position through the use of suspension as opposed to dis- missal. The value in this approach is that we secure the phychological effect of outright dismissal—the employee is inclined to think the worse. Suspension gives us time, time to recheck facts and minimize the extent to Which emotions may have influenced judgment. Where this reflection justifies the original judgment, dis- missal may follow and in most instances will stand. If not, we can mete discipline and return the employee to the payroll at a later date in no way impairing our status as management people. Familiarity with our ob- ligations under the Agreement will also do much to in- sure the success of the action we decide to take. The above thoughts are set down more as a basis for thinking and consideration rather than for communicat- ing to line management people at this time. The subject calls for much deliberation as to type of approach we ought to develop to get these views across without having our motives misunderstood. It is not our intention to indulge in-a witch hunt, but rather to give our management péople a clear understanding of their responsibilities and prerogatives as management people; and, the techniques and assistance available to them in solving perhaps our most difficult problems—personnel problems. 8-14-62 145 GENERAL COUNSEL’S EXHIBIT No. 13 vMIeN £b/6702eS FeoFTae, SYST: Couwese TY JAN S9ILE Fora MALE Jobson Tora FEMALE $32aS” ASIIS” TAN: 4970 Foran prAtE //P2S TFeo7ar. f-etALE JS H/ APY? Pay Ceeeae s3v) CH1EAbO ¢ So Bvesan Svsveaaw CAH/easee, TAN S9b6E carry vb? 96k Fors V3 4/79 TervAc: ws | Jeok7 JAN 1970 aARatr 06 i fae FORENAK — iy 742. . Te7TAu 675° J2é0 FevTAuw ComsPANnY ACANACE MENT _ CF Awe ABOVWH TAW s96£ 377 TAN -/770 4657S 146 GENERAL COUNSEL’S EXHIBIT No. 14 Sane Onlin VeAarF Chl1esee STAY SUB: Cove. CH Peabo: ; S74" sve q FLANT SEE Ww CergPhF7- IBEW ae a a eleaicac. ] SCH. be Orv AN’ DOT SECT /9CE- POF J772 =. 9/0 2, 147 GENERAL COUNSEL’S EXHIBIT No. 16 Section C SCHEDULE 2 TSH TEs i Tat re - all; itl aie i ii \ 1 + 0 il eed or ~~ / o} - Fe a ie a ee tele en * . . p> pr PA NCEIR TEN OE: NIRA TRE MPL ES © P i wes Aah LP ia) ‘ ews ia eegt elas SIE PMI LAL YD AIEEE LETT IE IE ON IE CN mePAe CONT NEE RE, CONDLED NIE II ONE EID 34 1 —_— + 149 ARTICLE XXII ADMISSION OF MEMBERS * + * a Sec. 2. Each applicant for membership shall fill out an application blank furnished or approved by the LS., and answer all questions. The original application or a copy must be sent to the LS. Sec. 3. The acceptance of an application for member- ship, and the admission of the applicant into any L.U. of the I.B.E.W., constitutes a contract between the member, the L.U. and the I.B.E.W., and between such member and all other members of the LBEW Sec 4. Each applicant admitted, shall, in the presence of members of the I.B.E.W., repeat and sign the follow- ing obligation: WE i ak ees Nee ? oO Lomas oe presence of members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, promise and agree to conform to and abide by the Constitution and laws of the I.B.E.W. and its local unions. I will further the purposes for which the I.B.E.W. is instituted. I will bear true allegi- ance to it and will not sacrifice its interest in any man- ner.” Sec. 5. The obligation card signed by the applicant shall be sent to the LS. The L.U. shall have each applicant, except as pro- vided in Section 10 ofthis article, take the obligation before a regular meeting, or if it so decides, this may be done outside the regular meeting in the presence of the president or the vice president or the recording secretary. * * * * 150 ARTICLE XXVI WITHDRAWAL CARDS—PARTICIPATING AND HONORARY * * * * Sec. 5. The validity of any withdrawal card shall be dependent upon the good conduct of the member. It can be annulled by any L.U. or by the I.P. for violation of the laws of the I.B.E.W., or the bylaws and rules of any L.U., or for working with or employing non-members of the I.B.E.W. to perform electrical work, or for any ac- tion of the holder detrimental to the interests of the I.B.E.W. Membership in the I.B.E.W. is automatically terminated upon anhulment of any withdrawal card. A member on a withdrawal card may be subject to charges, trial and appropriate penalty in accordance with provisions of the Constitution. - ARTICLE XXVII MISCONDUCT, OFFENSES AND PENALTIES Sec. 1. Any member may be penalized for committing any one or more of the following offenses: (1) Resorting to the courts for redress of any injustice which he may believe has been done him by the I.B.E.W. or any of its L.U.’s without first making use, for at least a four-month period, of the process available to him under the I.B.E.W. Constitution including any appeal or appeals from any decision against him. (2) Urging or advocating that a member, or any L.U., start action in a court of law against the 151 40 “LUV. 18 (“pesn 9q 03 3oTT¥q [eyWJO 943 JO aA¥9 © “Hdnp exe. uw oq esmxayj0 [eys ofdues oyy “jo, “184 94} JO SOBZ OY} SsoIDE AUOUTMIOAd Azvedde Weys «ATTAAVS» Plow 043 3843 deoxe—puTy Aue Jo sZuy -yavur Suv. £2289 You T[eys s]dues ey ‘AABMO}T *U0T} ~22]9 “AT Aue ur pasn 0q 03 3o]]eq [ePWJo ey} Jo od “Wes ¥—so8[d snonzjdsuoo v ut sys0d 10—zno streur ‘ATI © wey esuayo uv paxepysuos oq you [[eys 31) *suo}} _“U@AUOD 03 SazEpPTpUED Jo ‘soYJO “AQT JOZ sozepIpuT. 20 oJeprpuvs Auw qsuyeZe 10 Tox 70A 04 srequiour sonpUr OF PLOYye UB Uy 498 Yons 07 ABM AuE Uy AJIed 8 Buyeq 20 ‘arnjeu -snojeqr 20 uemnpnezy ‘snoja “IA 8 JO dsj SuryzAuw 20 susis ‘srauueq ‘sreurverjs BuypAeidsip* 10 ‘soyeq payzeut ‘s194}9| “‘sy}!qpuey ‘spavo -Buysod go .4no Suypuey. “Buypreyy (LT) Age tas | E>) 4 zo “M'D'a'T ou} zo sant. 94} JO UORRIOIA reY}0 10 sexLYS IO. Pezo~Nvun ‘usyyos ‘uorsseoes ‘us;uOlU ~3820Ape JO osodind 94} 10J-1eAe0szeym Bu 20 Supeyjes Aue uy uoyediyied 20 Sulpuezy. (91) “MTA 84} 10 “Ey & Jo sAouow fue Supepadoiddesrm 10 Buyayeoax AQuenpnery (91) *aBpa|Mouy Yons-0} payytqua you suos ~aad 03°17 B zo Ssauysnq OY; UMOUy SupyeW (PT) : “rT JO Sid} UNbpweY "10. eoyyo ey} punore 30 UT Rs So ~uy Suyeq 20 ‘squvoproqur Supyurzp ‘aoueqinjsip Aue ur Sunjedronzed zo Buyjrero ‘aB8enZuvl oalsnqe Suisn “pavog eAljnvexgq ‘831 Jo Sumeour 20 Buyjsau “QT Aue jo Auowxey 10 sored ey} Buyqinysiq (gt) . *Burjeeut yons ouy SjUBd[xojUT SuyALI¥9 20 ‘Zurjsour yons Aue zveu 210 ur SyuworxozUy SupfUpp’ to ‘pazwojxoquy opym ‘Suyeout sazTuIWOD Aus 20 ‘pasog eArynoexq S3y 10 “py ws a... £2 “LUV Jo Buyjeour Luv 38 queseid Sujeq 10 Sujzequq (ZT) "6398 JO yo" [nz Aue Aq “AA “y"g"] ey} JO Aaquieul B ZujZu01m estai19y}0 0 Zuwepurjs (TT) WC a: oe § 843 ‘07 pesoddo 20 ‘03 yejUaWA}ep St YTYA esne2 10 UO}VzyUBsIO Aut JO 4sareqUT oy} UT Burys0A (OT) “M'D'E'T 84} JO 8, "T Buows 10 srequieul oy} JO AUB Zuowe uossuessip 10 wo1jdvz BIYVSSIP 9}¥eI9~0z Buyjdwiez3e 20 Buyesip (6) . PMC i: i | 94} JO SeANeUasaider 20 susoyo 20 “‘saaiyejues sauder JO siesyo syy “AT & Juaserdarsim yorum 20 Qnoge syzNIzUN UfezUOD YoIYM sSieyjO JO s[xIOWo aqnd 0} ‘syueurezejs je10 Zupyeut zo ‘aspaiayj}0 20 snowAuous ‘sjuaulez"3S 10 £19332] Burpueg (g) “U01}3} “uaserdeistur 10 syrodar asyez ‘s,°"] Buowe 20 ‘dyys -Aaquiaul 94} Suowe Burjzejno19 10 Burysyqng (1) . “*slequieul Jo dno1Z 10 Aaquieur Aus Jo 10 "pT Auw Jo *M'q'g'y OY} Woz JeEMEIpYyIA B ynoge Fujzq 0} Zupyjduisyye 10 Zuyywooapy (9) *pezSarezU! SIIY}O IO JlesuITY Aequaaut 3y3 JO pred 0y} uo rzayZI0 ‘uoNEzUesardaistw Aq 10 Suva quejupnesy Yysnory, dyysiequisur Buyuye3qQ (¢) NT 9Y} JO SIEdYo zedord ey} AJOU 03 20 aspuayo ey} qsuyede saBreyo fy 03 Zurpres yah “QT B Jo sejnz 40 sMvfq ey} 10 ‘uoNNzWsSU0D sSIyZ JO UoTSTAOId Aus JO uonrjoja ay} Jo eSpajmouy Zuracy (Pp) SA"T B JO sajnz 10 ‘squomesi3e Bupjiom ‘smejsq ey} 20 ‘ule1ey sejnr ay} pus u0y “0}}}SU0D SIYy, Jo uolsjsord Aue Jo uorjejora (¢) + “M'H'A'T 84} JO S}INOD OY} [}e. YBn0143 sap euler [|B Suysneyxe ys1y ynoyzIM ‘s1adyo szq Jo Aue 40 "Hy" B Ysujese TO ‘s1sdyoO $31 JO Aus 10 “Aggy 152 4t 18V $s Aq peta} pue pivay eq [eys ‘sQ"T JO saaijcjzuesas -dai put szaoyjo Jsurese Jdaoxe ‘sadarye |TV *Z ‘98S Seay pue sasieyy “‘aiquondde @IVYA SeIpog e}yBUIpzogns 19430 pus STRunoD ways{g ‘sjpuneD peorrey epnjour 1eys ‘29 “RHE S7Y} JnoySno1y3 pesn se ,,'S°)"T,, SEGUE OYyL “Spoq azeulpiogns 29470 10 “Q"T “MAT 24} qsuyeSe Axe] JO Zin0> B UT UOT}Oe UE Zuljzie}S o10jaq ‘sjeedde e)qepeae [je Buypnpour ‘uoynzrysu0D sty; Uy 20F pepjaoad serpemiar [Je ysnvyxe 0} pe1jqo oq |[cys Apoq szeurpiogns 29430 20 JPuNCD wleysAg ‘j1ouNoD PBoryey ‘uoyuQ yeooy “zeoyyo “requieur A1eAq : “Aqeued 12430 Aue “Jo naj] Ut 10 ‘oj UOFIPpE Uy UOTPEIOJA ples Jo zINs “at BSE “QT JO “MAT 943 Aq porinouy sjs02 pus Saez Sou10}3e s]qeuuocsval ey} 0} Jenbe qunows us pessesse oq Apw aanejuasaider 20 as2qo Sy} ‘aAoqe (1) worRresgns Jo wore]OFA Jo UOP2JAUOD JO BSED UT *peTjedxe 20 ‘yj0q 20 ‘papuedsns 20 pessasse 10 *uopysod 20 e2yjo wor peaourer oq Avur oy “sesuayo peureu-saoge ey} JO ezour 10 9uo “Aue Jo pezIA a> BS} “HT & JO eAtjeqUesatder AO edo ue JT *£yyeued aeyjo Aue ‘yo nay uy 20 £02 UoNIppe Uy WOR VIOLA Pres Jo y[Nsar v SU “\"T 10 “M'A'a'I Oy Aq pezinouy 83809 puv seez sAou10}}0 o]quucsear ey} 03 yenbe qunours uv pessesse oq Anw zequieur ey} ‘aA0gs (1) woy2e6qns Jo WOHBIOHA JO UO}OTAUOD Jo eFed UT *partedxa .10 ‘yj0q 20 *‘pepuedsns 10 pessesse oq Auw sesueyo poueu-sA0ge oy} JO eroOur JO suo Auv Jo pazoyAuod szsquieu Auy *M'O'A'T OU} Ul diyszequreur Jo eouepyAe 1911}0 20 ‘gdyeoer ‘paved diyszequiew syy ‘xeuunu Auv uy Bupivzv 20 ‘sn 03 uoszed zeyjouw Buraoyy (ez) *O'] 04} Buranp Suyjoa ut powers Aue Yj} peyoouTos Buyoq 10 “O'] Oy} 04 soyus Te wipe! ai es Met ben, al Gi ER ue Sp ET gE ST) RNB UST 38 . 40 “iv ‘SOP LOZ SpeHusperd Suyysyuiny 20 Suyureyqo- wy1u woRreuu0D UT pnezy Bunypmwoo AYIA (Zz) "UOHININSUOD STYY YI soueps0s9z Uy “ATA 8y3 20 “QT B YA AQMIyTP UT perey> 2p Auedwoo 10 yenprarpur Aue roxy Buryzoay (1z) *sIeoyjo tedoid $3] 10 “fT oy} JO quesuos Suyavy ynoyzai eyndsrp 20 soueaejis pede)[e Suv Jo asneseq yom Jo e¥eddojys & Buysneg (oz) + “epezz sry 4] exzadord uxve[ 03 ‘Ayjequeut yyuN zo ejqeun Suracid 20 ‘s1eyjo Jo Azredoid 20 seal] ey} JeZuepue Aeur 4vyy WOrTPUCD B uy YOM Bulavoy JO ‘“Asuueul syTJUSUTyIOM ‘eyes B Ul YIOM S]Y Op LO [jeysuy OF yey (GT) “uoystaoid syqy Bupejora Aca £uB ut OF 10 *q"T OY} JO QUasuOD ynOYyzA Buysijteaps yons FPS 0} Sapuess oO sjenpyArpuy Zupmojye 10F 91g “Bll POY oq [Sys ‘UORIpsEINe SAA a'T ey} Jepun Buyulod uoyezueZi0 rzeyjo 10 “py Lue Jo eanejuos order ad ae2yo Aue ‘requieu Auy “g’y ey} jo jues eU0d JNOUIIA J9}}eUT Yons uy avedde sisoqyo [euo}eU ~xeqU 40 “fT Jo Saxnqojd 10 sacred 04} 10 “AAAI oq} 40 “H°T B JO ouleu eyR ucsya “je ‘surelzs ord ‘syooqiveé toy Suyspeape Zuypyos (st) "0S W0}}99S “TTTAX OPHAV JO UORVOTA uy oq qou ‘aA0qe Y}OF QS SB porndard Ajrzedord ‘uo -woriqnd “AT [eyo Spyz Jo uoHnqizysIp ey, (aq) \ “9077 TUIWOH UOH22IT “NT pozeusjsep [np ey3°J0 uojsjazedns oy} zepun peird | ord oq [[eys UOHworqnd siyL “AT ey} Jo FTEYOd Uy “pues Joy poured eoueyiedxe pue prey sed1yO ‘pauroys ted BjuowUsisse gezj;UIWIOD “AT OY} UIYITAL S213 “JAI JO PI0I9T-Jenjo"s B YITA 1ey}2B0} ‘aoyJo “QT TOF SOZCP!puvd [Ie ys]] [YS Yoryar uoyzworqnd yerowo us eqnqijysip Avul “QT B Gojeq ejduus ey} 03 UOHIPPT UZ Puy ‘oaoges Gy} Surpueysyyimjon (Vy) 153 £@ ‘liv og ‘[PuneD peorrey e jo eajequeseidar 20 ueuLeYyo ereues “aadyo ue ro “p-7 peoriel & Jo aanrzpas ~sidel Jo i2a2yjo uv yureZe aie saZieyd yons yi ‘J@A8MOH “PRAJOAU! 2q 3217}SIp eu wey} a1ow plnoys “QI 243 Aq pazzezmp se x0 ‘sould 400} 8}2e Jo 420 PaSoiye oy; arayat pazer0] sr “QT 943 yo1ySTp asoy.n UF “TAT 8 wera Peay eq Ysnu saFivyo yong 43 JO Skep Og UNWWZM epwut oq ysnu pue ‘saould PUS Seep WCAder eyewpxoudds Zurpnyour ‘uo “SIOHA UF Oq 0} PALepSuoD S}9H 10 Yow OY} O7U}S ysNUT SaBiwyo Oy], “peyejora quourear8e Supji0m Jo sanz ‘smBidq 943 ‘uoRNIASUCD SNA JO sUOT}DaS IO UO] ~208 943 4jpeds pus ‘djred BupZrey> oy; Aq paudis ‘ZunuwA uy pequasaid eq YSNW “Q"T B JO aAlzEqUes ~sidez 10 se2yo UE ysulESe seRiey [Ty “g ‘20g * ~SPAHUWeseidey pue Sra2WC Jo speizy, : "quaserd exam pasnzoe 043 ySn0y} “dT 20 “d“A'T 04} Aq paqoarrp way os op Tleys 3! pue ‘os Sutop Ayysnt SAUBIUINAIID IO sjoIvy aY4z Sjeez PeSSNISIP 9q JOU [[TYsS PIvOg 9y3 Jo UOT}2E 40 qyoder Yrg “AT ey3 jo Burjseur avjnBer 4xou 243 0} ‘Aue Nl b8 £t 18V Jf ‘eouaquas pur ‘sSutpuy s}t quodaa jyeys 7 ‘uors “Pep & peyower sey pavog [erg 243 Yay “9 “deg : “wily Quas -sidar 0} Jequew “ayag’y ue Pemoyje aq “ysenber uodn snut ayy *]e1z} jeijaedwr 20 sey & paquraa - © T[8ys pasnooe eyy, “Avjep & yons uerrem saour}s “WNIT]D JO SV 9yz Sja2y 3x Udy pesn22u ay} 03 Avjep alquuosear v quvi3 Ueys pavog ayy, *payy aan SeSivyo oy} Sep 94} wory sfep ¢p uey} 22}v] jou OSCD OY} YAM pesoord [jeys preog je12} ey: "¢ “vag "paeog [e143 04} erojeq reedde [yeys ey aoujd pues eur ay3 jo aon “OU U9}}HIM Y}IAd Jay}2803 Ssarppe UMOUY yse[ sIy 3B TOCWoUr pasnd9e ey} 0} saZivy2 yons Jo Adod & pues Ajeyerpouruyy [eys “S"y ay, “saBzeyo 243 Jo Bury ayy BULMOTOZ “fy ey} Jo Surjsour eYUL “Sot 10 928 padajje oyy jo ‘ereme Useq eAeY pynoys A;qeuos *-Bat 10 ‘a1eMB sUlEda ysIy Azed ZurZ1eyo ay} awry 24? 30 Skep-Og UIYIM eox/d y003 S32" 20 ye pasai\e OU} UOHPIpsinf esoya UT “AT BYR Jo "Sy ay} 03 pe} “}UIGNs oq JSNU Siequiaut ysuTEZE saBivyy “yf "22S “seovid 10 sajzep queAsjar ayeurtxoidde- Surpnypour ‘uorzejora ur aq 03 Pezeprsuod sje IO yor OY} 0783S JSNUL SaBivyo ayy, *pazejolA A]paSajje quaut -20188 Buryi0m: 10 ‘sajnz ‘sarjfq ay} ‘uornnzNsucg SIG} JO. SUO}}99S Jo UOIzdas 9y3 Ajads pus ‘Ajaed Sur -B1eyo 243 Aq pouSis ‘Burs Ul pequesead eq ysnu SioquiaU IO Jaquisut & 4suiese Satieyo ly “g “eS (XI pue AT saaH2y ur papraoad sv ‘save uIn}22 UP UONIE OL} OF “O'A"[ O43 10 “gqr] 9y} Jo zamod yyiM PIBUOS 0} panijzsuod eq jou [[eBYS UoNres sty) *@0uajUas pus uoTs “Pep TOF Juans oq |[eys preoq ey} Jo 270A Ay120F. “CU VW “XIX @PAV YI souRpIooIE UI ‘pieog je1a3 ey} SB you TTYs Yorya prvog. eaAQnsexg “HT om 4 154 igauh 3 opie? rer ba 13 leer i if He HE i “iket alata 4 i atl li HE siadd © fa ult iy u: dg gd8 at se ei a gee aE Rud tied cH ofits 2 UE senses a atq? ghia’ SRL ils gs 238093 fea; qta = AReGS +n Gm fala HEHIN eu efile Huis ra E438 isityy) ptugity 4 tgs fauhiiniiie SEB fb acteditielansds Tay : PEE Ee rele si ATL st betel er i nego ght Hiinaliuiadl lie hel reset is iret he ane Fete 155 RUNONE BTL WITrOME COvrs poms 1 nae MAFQUT Gr EMPLONLt VEE LEAVING SERVICE ° erwerd srignael copy te employment eae eee at : sree Ghseago Toms ooory Full Vine) Oe Plant Owisien, Central Vompere'y Fat Vim tion frites. C08 tr ye Otues. “~ . : ita Cab, Appr _ far ; 5. nme 24442-1806 __ fae # 998.00 = fal ET Ot dh Ye me Bere of Nodeo fe-cnploynent Recommended, Yes () tte Oete lowe Once __ 2419-70 7 ea =" 0 8 © 1 hey tow tier (Soe attached). . a Sen Reentry nto meNeS oem oe r . FARCE AOOMUAN Bac — . > ae ee ee ee eee ee le : > , ° Z | . So B® - 1 ° Ls anmemcah — — - e e = T aa a 3 - : *. - . ae 4 of . Naan Ho. ae Building Cable Forezamn en , : : - MAR 6 1970, __ [Ee a 111970. an acing : ”. + —_— sey > TAIT og i i CR te * 157 Record of Attendance Danny Covington, Building Cable Apprentice Wo record maintaintd for first four weeks. 12-13-69 ~ Did not show up for Saturday Tour (2nd time) 12-15-69 - Absent - Personal Business (No reason) 12-19-69 - 4 hours ~ Personal Business 12-22-69 - 2 hours late ( docked ) 12-26-69 - 1 hour late ( docked ) 1- 9-70 ~ 10 minutes late 1-12-70 — 10 minutes late 1-13-70 = 30 minutes late , 1-19-70 - 4 hours = Personal Business (Jail) / 1-21-70 - 1 hour late ’ / 2- ka70 = Absent — flu f 2-10-70 ~ 1 hour late : \ 2-16-70 - 20 minutes late (Plant School) . ' 2-17-70 - Absent - Toothache (Did not show up at Plant School and \ did not call until 11:00 a.m.) \ 2-19-70 - 1 hour late — Brought in to Construction Cffice and dismisse’l. Mr. Covington and the Union were informed on January 13, 1970 that further tardiness or'unsubstantiated absence would lead to dismissal, 158 illinois Bell e “ i *s i . x. “ DANIS. Se 2 ae ge wi 3,3 Margh 2S, -1969 x. ee. ‘ : : : : me the phone. The party hung up upon hearing my voice in the background. JI asked Ed who was on the phone. He said Steve Molk, end I asked where he was. Ed said at the 181 West Madison Grill. _I told him to take one elevator -and pick up Mr. Hroch (the etewerd) his job location and I would take another and meet him on the first floor lobby. It was my intent at this point to meet Hr. Holk and kr. Woods coming back to the building and have a confrontation with them myself, and with their union steward. ‘We waited on the first floor and they did not return. About fifteen minutes passed end I told Mr. Full and Kr. Hroch to remain in the lobby and weit for them to return, because I was going to the bar to find then and I might miss seeing them. I entered the 181 West Madison Grill about 3:50 P.M. and found Mr. Molk and Mr. Woods sittig at the bar with drinks in front of them and money on the counter. They were, in my opinion, inebriated. I told both of them they were off the payroll, that I could do nothing for them and that they would be hearing from their union representative. They both nodded their heads; but gid not say a word. I stood there a moment and then left withovt further conversation. I waited outside for a few monents, and when they made no attempt to come out I returned to “the lobby, picked up Mr. Full and Hr. Hroch and proceeded to Mr. Fioretti's office to relate what had happened. Footnote: Considering the fact that I held a meeting at 8:00 A.M. this very day and discussed not leaving the building and not to - consume alcoholic beverages, it is my personal feeling that the two men in question were in direct defiance of my endeavors for better job performance,: and it is my recommendation that they be terminated. a _* ‘j «tee 161 ; APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP ) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS -.. Local No. B-134 * CHICAGO 7, ILLINOIS 0 — ‘ INITIATION FEE $__/ 22° Desiring to becoine a member of the I. B. E. W., I hereby make application to your Local Union with the accompanying fee and vouchers, I am a : : ° . 2 and work for_SQRivae “Bed AabalSrone where I have been employed § for_Q_ “20a Before that I worked for. Have you ever been a member of the I. B.E. W.?. Ye it so, where?. Why did yen discontinue your membership? Have you ever made application for membership in the L.B.E.W.?_ If so, where?.__>_. : How long have you been in the electrical business?__&_ Wso.2 If given membership in your Local Union I will fulfill the requirements of the laws of the organ- ization and remain a true and loyal member. I make this appiication of my-own free will, be- lieving it to be to my interest to associate myseif with you. : - I also agree to all the rules and regulations as set forth in the By-Laws of your Local Union and the Constitution of the I. B. E. W. : Failure to comply with any of the agreements as set forth above will be deemed by me a sufficient cause for the forfeiture of any sum of money I have paid with this application to the Brotherhood or may hereafter pay into your organization on account of this application. I also agree that twenty per cent (2092) of the initiation fee will accompany this application and that the full amount of initiation fee will be paid within ninety (90) days from the date of application; failure to do so shall be a forfeiture of all monies I have paid towards this initiation fee. . 7 g Date o Birth Sadar 17,1929 signed Sao @ Wasson , we Address 13.2 W Warens Metephone “SP= | > 2 62.9 Date of Application Benge" Date passed by Executive Board 206 Lat/ty etd ~ International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL- CIO, and Local 134, International Brotherhood of Elec- trical Workers, AFL-CIO (Illinois Bell Telephone Com- pany) and Bell Supervisors Protective Association (Not a Labor Organization). Case 13-CB-2890 162 July 14, 1971 DECISION AND ORDER By CHAIRMAN MILLER AND MEMBERS FANNING, JENKINS, AND KENNEDY On June 29, 1970, Trial Examiner Frederick U. Reel issued his Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, find- ing that the Respondents have engaged in and were en- gaging in certain unfair labor practices within the mean- ing of the Act, and recommending that they cease and de- sist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the attached Trial Examiner’s Decision. There- after, both Respondents (hereinafter referred to as Re- spondent International and Respondent Local) and the Charging Party (herein referred to as the Association) filed exceptions to the Decision and supporting briefs. The General Counsel has filed a brief in support of the Trial Examiner’s Decision, cross-exceptions to the Trial Examiner’s Decision, and an answering brief to the Re- spondent International’s exceptions. On September 2, 1970, the National Labor Relations Board, having determined that the instant case raised is- sues of substantial importance in the administration of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, ordered that this case be consolidated with one other’ for the 3 purpose of oral argument before the Board. On October 4 5, 1970, these cases were argued orally before the Board. : The Board’? has reviewed the rulings of the Trial m : Basia , individual employed as a supervisor from becoming or remaining a member of a labor organization.” '* The ef- fect of these various provisions is.a denial of any statu- tory protection to supervisors either in their joining or assisting a union or in their refraining from such activi- ties. It leaves the employer free to prohibit such activi- ties or to permit them, to discharge supervisors for en- gaging in such activities if he desires. Congress gave employers this freedom to deal with supervisors precisely because of the problem of “dividend loyalties.” “* It stop- ped short, however, of making it an unfair labor practice for a labor organization to organize supervisors or to admit them to membership. The only limitation it placed on unions in this regard is the narrow prohibition against restraining or coercing employers in the selection of rep- resentatives (including supervisors, but not limited to supervisors) for purposes of collective bargaining or the adjustment of grievances. My colleagues, in effect con- sith ASP ee ai bie sabe amet ten A Se NT alls i icles aI TE AMS De LLP eit set ONE Bry $a Si EW Aaah a ee ae 4 13 Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 192 NLRB No. 16, incorporated 3 by reference in the majority opinion herein. 14 Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C. 152(3). 4 529 U.S.C. 164(a). 16 [bid. _ 17S, Rept. 105 on S. 1126, pp. 3-5, I Leg. Hist. 409-411 (1947). at eS mye SHY — . . . i aA Ties SARL prey RN 173 strue this as a bill of rights freeing supervisors from any restraint or coercion by a labor organization, even where the effect is not to deny their employer the uncoerced performance of collective-bargaining or grievance-adjust- ment functions. This construction goes far beyond that intended by Congress as disclosed by the relevant legislative history of the section: As first proposed in S. 1126, the section prohibited a labor organization from interfering with, as well as restraining or coercing, an employer in the selec- tion of his bargaining representatives. Senate Report 105 on S.1126, stated Section 8(b) (1): This proscribes unions and their agents from interfering with, restraining, or coercing employers in the selection of their representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining or the set- tlement of grievances. Thus, a union or its responsi- ble agents could not, without violating the law, coerce an employer into joining or resigning from an em- ployer association, which negotiates labor contracts on behalf of its members; also, this subsection would not permit a union to dictate who shall represent an employer in the settlement of employee grievances, or to compel the removal of a personnel director or supervisor who has been delegated the function of settling grievances."* | This same refrain—the prohibition of forcing employers into or out of employer associations or of compelling them to remove or discharge supervisors or personnel directors who engage in the settlement of grievances—is repeated in the remarks of Senator Taft and other Senators dur- ing floor debate on the bill.’ Although no Senator ad- dressed himself to the precise question presented in this and the other cases cited by the majority, namely, the con- ditions under which coercion of the representative be- comes or constitutes coercion of the employer in the selec- tion of the representative, I believe the legislative history 18 At p. 21, I Leg. Hist. 427 (1947). 993 Cong. Rec. 3953 (II Leg. Hist. 1012), 93 Cong. Rec. 4266 (II Leg. Hist. 1077), 93 Cong. Rec. 5106 (II Leg. Hist. 1454). —_— SP ERE SEMI OLY LEP IO LAINIE ES ONT INET IOS 5 ENON ST ene varie PRIN LO i wt hal a Date Sa 174 demonstrates that unless the union-imposed restraint on a supervisor is imposed because of his discharge of duties involved in the performance of the statutorily described functions or in the discharge of duties closely related thereto, the restraint or coercion is not proscribed by the section. At most, restraint imposed on the supervisor because of his performance of other functions constitutes an interference with the employer’s selection of repre- sentatives for the performance of collctive-bargaining or the adjustment of grievances functions assigned to such representatives, as indeed the majority opinion finally concludes with respect to the fines in this case. However, the words “interfere with” were eliminatd from the sec- tion by an amendment offered by Senator Ives because of their far-reaching impact.”” I cannot agree to the re- insertion of those words by decisional interpretation. In summary, because the fines involved herein were not imposed upon the supervisors because of the manner in which they performed duties related to their collective- bargaining or grievance-adjustment functions, but were imposed because of their violation of an unrelated union rule proscribing members of the union from performing struck work during a strike, I find that the supervisors were not restrained or coerced in the performance of the statutorily protected functions. It follows that the Em- ployer was not restrained or coerced in the selection of representatives to perform such functions. Accordingly I would dismiss the complaint. APPENDIX NOTICE TO MEMBERS NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD POSTED BY ORDER OF THE An Agency of the United States Government WE WILL NOT fine or otherwise discipline supervisory employees of Illinois Bell Telephone Company (such as, for example, P.B.X. installation foremen) for engaging in productive work during a strike or for participating in 2093 Cong. Rec. 4398 (II Leg. Hist. 1138-39). 175 any organization designed to counsel and protect such supervisors in the event they work during a strike. WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner restrain or coerce Illinois Bell Telephone Company in the selec- tion of its representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining or the adjustment of grievances. WE WILL rescind, and expunge from our records, the fines levied against supervisory employees for working during the 1968 strike or for having formed the Bell Supervisors Protective Association. - WE WILL refund to the Illinois Bell Telephone Company the sums it has paid pursuant to the fines we levied against supervisors in connection with the 1968 strike. WE WILL advise in writing each of the supervisors fined in connection with the 1968 strike that his fine has been rescinded and expunged, and that we will reimburse each the sums paid pursuant to those fines. LOCAL 134, INTERNATIONAL BROTHER- HOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL CIO . (Labor Organization) Dated By (Representative) (Title) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO (Labor Organization) Dated By (Representative) (Title) This is an official notice and must not be defaced by anyone. This noticé must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date of posting and must not be altered, de- faced, or covered by any other material. Any questions concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions may be directed to the Board’s Office, Room 881, Everett McKinley Dirksen Senate Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, Tele- phone 312-353-7575. SRE NBR i ERT EER BY NETO ARNE DYSART 176 TRIAL EXAMINER’S DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE FREDERICK U. REEL, Trial Examiner: This proceeding, heard at Chicago, Illinois, from March 31 through April 3, 1970, pursuant to a charge filed June 10, 1969, and a complaint issued December 31, 1969, arises out of certain fines levied by the Respondent Local and confirmed by the parent, Respondent International, upon certain of their members for either (a) continuing to perform work for their Employer during the course of the Local Union’s strike against that Employer or (b) forming and becom- ing officers in an association (the Charging Party here- in), the purpose of which was to furnish assistance and counsel to foremen who worked during the strike. The primary issue in the case is whether the imposition of these fines violated Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Act, in view of the fact that in each instance the person fined was employed in what is allegedly a supervisory capacity, and allegedly represented his Employer in the adjustment of grievances. Respondents, denying that the persons fined were supervisors or that they adjusted grievances, further contend that in any event, under the circum- stances of this case, the fines did not as a matter of law involve the Respondents in violation of Section 8(b) (1) (B). Upon the entire record,’ and after due consideration of the briefs filed by General Counsel and each of the Respondents, and of the “Statement” filed on behalf of the Charging Party,’ I make the following: Pe A Od ee | Fee aE wee Dew Rd cameo ha ee ko ia dis TAL EMSA Including documents submitted after the hearing, which are hereby admitted as G.C. Exhs. 22, 23, and 24, and Local 134’s Exhs. 14A through I and 15A and B, respectively. j 4 5 : i : 4 H 3 ; ¥ 4 j $ : 3 * Respondents’ motion to strike a phrase from Charging Party’s Statement as “scandalous and/ or impertinent” is granted as Charg- ing Party consented thereto. 177 / FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER AND THE LABOR ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Illinois Bell Telephone Company, herein called the Com- pany, an Illinois corporation with headquarters in Chi- cago, renders local and long distance telephone service as part of a nationwide telephone system, and is “an em- ployer engaged in commerce within the meaning of Sec- tion 2(6) and (7) of the Act. Respondent Local 134, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL- CIO, herein called the Local or the Union, and its parent organization, the Respondent International, are labor or- ganizations within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act. II, THE UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES A. Background and Chronology For many years, long antedating any Federal labor legislation, the Company (or its predecessor) and the Local have had contractual relations, pursuant to which the Local represented the Company’s Chicago employees for purposes of collective bargaining. The bargaining unit embraced employees in the “Plant Department,” and included, inter alia, not only journeymen and apprentices engaged as P.B.X. installers but also persons employed as “P.B.X. Installation Foremen,” “Building Cable Fore- men,” “Test Center Foremen,” and “General Foremen.” The powers and duties of these “foremen” and the ques- tion whether they are “supervisors” within the meaning of the Act are among the litigated issues in this case. The contract provides that all members of the bargaining unit must become and remain members of the Local. As recently as 1959 the contracts in effect between the Local and the Company prescribed monthly wage rates for the various “foremen” listed above. Since May 1959 the contracts did not provide wage rates for those foremen, but did contain a section headed “Working Conditions for General Foremen and Foremen.” This provision con- cerned payment for overtime work and for certain ab- ft Ba ered Abe eae " OIE DP 178 sences, and contained a clause stating that an appoint- ment as general foremen could not be made for a period ‘of less than 5 days. Other provisions of the contract, such as, for example, that dealing with vacations, appear applicable to the foremen as well as to journeymen em- ployees.” Between May 8, 1968, and September 20, 1968, the Local was engaged in an economic strike against the Em- ployer. At the inception of the strike the Company in- formed the foremen referred to above that the Company would like to have them come to work, but that the deci- sion whether to work or to respect the strike was a mat- ter left to the discretion of each individual foreman, and that those who refrained from working during the strike could resume work when it ended without being penal- ized. The Local held a meeting just before the strike at which the foremen were advised that they would be sub- ject to union discipline if they performed rank-and-file work during the strike. A number of foremen thereupon retained counsel and formed an association (the Charg- ing Party, hereinafter referred to as the Association) to protect foremen who worked during the strike. During the course of the strike some of the foremen performed rank-and-file work, and some stayed out of work. After the strike the Company in no way discrimi- nated against the latter group, and indeed promoted some of them to higher positions. The Local conducted pro- ceedings against a number of foremen, and imposed fines of $500 on foremen who performed rank-and-file work during the strike and of $1000 each against the five fore- men who were instrumental in forming the Association. Most of the fined foremen appealed to the International, which in most instances sustained the action of the Local. During the intraunion proceedings, counsel for the Asso- ciation assisted the foremen in their defense, in which the accused foremen urged that they were supervisors, that the strike was not in their behalf, that the Local was not seeking to bargain for them, and that the union security clause which compelled their membership in the Local was illegal. The Local has commenced suit in the Illinois courts to a OR SUE ee Pe Ses « ie)» > Stet ed > oe, 179 collect some of the fines. Insofar as any of the foremen have paid any part of the fines, the Company has reim- bursed them. B. The Status of the Foremen as “Supervisors” Within the Meaning of the Act, and Their Powers With Respect to the Adjustment of Grievances As noted above, most of the foremen involved in this case were employed as P.B.X. installation foremen, or in work of similar character such as building cable fore- men, or general foremen. The record establishes that such foremen were in charge of crews of from 8 to 12 men, that they had power to grant time off to their men, that they scheduled overtime, selected the men who would work overtime, disciplined for tardiness by suspending men or docking their pay, and effectively recommended men for promotion or discharge. Although the Union argues that the testimony establishing these powers was of a vague and general nature, it called no witnesses to deny that the foremen possessed the powers which the company representatives, called as General Counsel’s wit- nesses, ascribed to them.’ On this record I find that the ° foremen in question possessed one or more of the powers set forth in Section 2(11) of the Act and are supervisors within the meaning of the Act. See, eg., N.L.R.B. v. Henry Colder Co., 416 F.2d 750, 754, fn. 3 (C.A. 7, 1969). As to the authority of these foremen to adjust griev- ances, the contract recites with respect to the grievance procedure that “The employee or his Steward shall first bring the grievance to his Foreman, or other first line supervisor,” and that “If the grievance is not settled, it shall then be taken up with the succeeding appropriate 3’ General Counsel expressed a readiness to interrogate individual foremen as to their powers and duties. The Trial Examiner pre- vented him from doing so on the ground that such testimony would be cumulative, but expressly invited counsel for the Local to cross- examine such foremen on that issue, and also to put on testimony on that issue as part of Respondent’s case. No such cross-examina- tion was attempted and the Local adduced no testimony on this issue as part of its case. BOS VO BERS RTL LOTT EY ANION SY OES EERIE REIN LSM 6 i a ‘or are promoted to district installation superintendents 180 levels of supervision... .” The contract thus unequivo- cally provides that the foremen here in question may adjust grievances. Moreover, the testimony adduced by General. Counsel establishes that the foremen may adjust grievances arising out of disputes over whether an em- ployee should be paid for certain hours he worked after checking out, or over working conditions (such as ex- cessively cold air-conditioning), or over disciplinary ac- tion taken by the foreman, or over overtime allocations he had made. Indeed, the testimony shows that most of the grievances are adjusted informally by the fore- men, either by their making the requested adjustment or by their persuading the union representative that the grievance lacks merit. Manifestly, these matters are usually of minor importance, and major issues go on to later stages of the grievance procedure. Nevertheless, I am satisfied on this record that the foremen in question do have power to adjust, and do adjust, grievances. Again the Union’s suggestion that the testimony is vague and general is unavailing in the light of the contractual lan- guage and the Union’s failure to adduce testimony which would diminish the force of the evidence presented by General Counsel. The foregoing discussion of the powers and duties of the foremen is applicable to all those named in the com- plaint as having been fined except for three men identi- fied in the complaint as “assistant staff supervisor,” and two identified as “engineer.” The record establishes that an “engineer” has no supervisory authority and that an “assistant staff supervisor” has no occasion to partici- pate in the adjustment of grievances, and normally has no. people working for him. The record further estab- lishes that it is a common practice for the Company to transfer a man from a job as P.B.X. foreman to that of engineer and back again, and that “assistant staff supervisors” are selected from the ranks of P.B.X. fore- men, serve 1 or 2 years as assistant staff supervisors, and then either return to their jobs as’ P.B.X. foremen © (a supervisory position with power to adjust grievances). 181 C. Board Decisions Concerning a Union’s Power T Fine Supervisory Employees : | A series of recent Board decisions, several of which are now awaiting judicial review, hold that under the circumstances there presented a labor organization vio- lates Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Act (i.e. restrains or coerces an employer in the selection of his representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining or the adjustment of grievances) when it fines supervisory em- ployees who are union members. Insofar as Respondents attack the validity of any or all of these holdings, I must, of course, refer them to higher authority, administrative and judicial, as I am required to follow these precedents in the present state of the law. Insofar as Respondents urge that the instant case is distinguishable, however, it becomes important to set forth, as I understand it, what the Board has heretofore held in this area. The lead case apparently is San Francisco-Oakland Mailers’ Union No. 18, International Typographical Union (Northwest Publications, Inc.), 172 NLRB No. 252. In that case the union fined certain foremen-members‘ be- cause of alleged violations of the contract between the employer and the union. The union also threatened simi- lar action against foremen as a result of “disagreements involving contract interpretations or grievance adjust- ment.” The Board’s finding of violation in that case sheds little light on the problem here, for in that case the conduct for which the foremen were fined was directly related to their role as the employer’s representative in the adjustment of grievances and in collective. bargaining (which includes, of course, the administration of the con. tract; see Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 46).° - * There, as here, the contract required the foremen to be members of the union. *The Board in the Oakland Mailers case and in several subse- quent cases distinguished N.L.R.B. v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 175, on which Respondents place their principal reliance. The Board appears to be of the view that the fining of supervisors stands on an entirely different footing from the fining of rank-and- file members. I note that counsel for the International suggests that I not follow Blackhawk Tanning Co., Inc., 178 NLRB No. 25, ] 4 PS te PE FA RE EY A LOB LE IPE trey ’ CEPOL SD BNL AE IGE SNELL LIOR” 0 per naa VY SRO Bee IES, eA ING ALLA iL AG AE bg ILOII RAE oe CA LE PEE Pe Pata 182 The next case in this area to come before the Board was Toledo Locals. Nos. 15-P and 272 of the Lithogra- phers and Photoengravers International Union, AFL- CIO (The Toledo Blade Company, Inc.), 175 NLRB No. 173. In that case, as here, the foremen involved were required to be members of the union which fined them, The fines in that case were imposed for alleged viola- tions of th® contract, in that the supervisors worked on production during a strike, thereby violating two con- tractual provisions, one limiting the amount of produc- tion a supervisor can do, and the other prescribing a minimum crew before any work can be performed. The Board in that case held that the union by imposing the fines violated Section 8(b) (1) (B). The case may be dis- tinguishable from that now before us, for although in both cases the supervisors worked while their union was out on strike, the basis of the Board’s holding in the Toledo case appears to be that the supervisors were in- volved in what their union claimed to be violations of the contract, and no such contention is urged here. The third case in this area to reach the Board was New Mexico District Council of Carpenters and Joiners of America; United Brotherhood of Carpe [Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.] --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386414_0320%3A02. Public record. Not legal advice.