# Appendix — Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386414_0039%3A11

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Appendix
- **Published:** January 1, 1973
- **Citation:** 409 U.S. 363

## Text

4
Pe

INDEX

Volume AX-I
Irem
TWA Ex. 2 (Statement of Robert W. Rummel) ..

TWA Ex. R-3 (Toolco-Convair Amended Agree-
ment—Model 22, 6/4/56)

TWA Ex. R-5 (TWA-Toolco Purchase Agree-
ment—May 9; 1960)

TWA Ex. R-8(80) (FAA Registration Docu-
ments—B707-331, No. N771TW) ......---.-----------

TWA Ex. R-8(81) (FAA Registration Docu-
ments—B707-331, No. N772TW)

‘TWA Ex. 3 (Affidavit of J. B. Connelly) _.....

TWA Ex. 4(b) (C. & C. Report—Comparative
Profit Study)

TWA Ex. 4(c)(1) (C. & C. Report—Financial
Results from Reconstructed Jet Fleet) -..........

TWA Ex. 4(c)(4) (Exhibits B-J to C. & C. Re-
port—Financial Results from Reconstructed
Jet Fleet)

Volume AX-II

TWA Ex. 5(a) (Drexel Harriman Ripley, Inc.
Report—Parts I & IT)

TWA Ex. 5(b) (Exhibits to Drexel Harriman
Ripley, Inc. Report)

AX-1

Irzem

TWA Ex. 7(b)(1) (Price Waterhouse Study—
Volume One)

TWA Ex. 7(b)(2) (Price Waterhouse Study—
Volume Two)

Volume AX-III

TWA Ex. 10 (Letter—Boeing to TWA re 707
Negotiations—12/29 /54)

TWA Ex. 12 (Toolco-Convair CV-990 Purchase
Agreement—11/10/60)
TWA Ex. 13 (Holliday Call Sheet—Feb. 20-27,
1961)
TWA Ex. 14 (CV-990 Purchase Agreement—
Amendment of 2/22/61)
TWA Ex. 22 (Rummel Call Sheets) —..........
TWA Ex. 23 (Letter Agreement—Sale of Six
Boeings to Pan American)
TWA Ex. 39 (Affidavit of Joseph P. Ripley) ..

TWA Ex. 42 (C. & C. Report—Revision of
Pages 63, 64, 71 & 72)
TWA Ex. 43 (C. & C. ‘Report—Revision of
Page 51)
TWA Ex. 46 (Jet and Turboprop Aircraft of
TWA and Principal Competitors—1958-66) ....
TWA Ex. 47 (Boeing Aircraft Employed on
Routes Formerly Served by B-720Bs) ............

AX-452

AX-729
AX-732

AX-735

AX-740

AX-742

AX-743

- Trem PAGE
TWA Ex. 50 (Price Waterhouse Report—Sum-

mary of Application of Assumptions) ...........0 AX-744
TWA Ex. 72 (TWA Annual Report—1939) ....... AX-745
TWA Ex. 73 (TWA Annual Report—1940) ... AX-752
TWA Ex. 74 (TWA Annual Report—1941) ..... AX-758
TWA Ex. 75 (TWA Annual Report—1942) ...... AX-760
TWA Ex. 76 (TWA Annual Report—1943) ........ AX-763
TWA Ex. 77 (TWA Annual Report—1944) ..... AX-766
TWA Ex. 78 (TWA Annual Report—1945) ........ AX-769
TWA Ex. 79 (TWA Annual Report—1946) ........ AX-773
TWA Ex. 80 (TWA Annual Report—1947) ........ AX-779
TWA Ex. 81 (TWA Annual Report—1948) ........ AX-783
TWA Ex. 82 (TWA Annual Report—1949) ........ AX-788
TWA Ex. 83 (TWA Annual Report—1950) ........ AX-792
TWA Ex. 84 (TWA Annual Report—1951) ........ AX-797
TWA Ex. 86 (TWA Annual Report—1953) ....... AX-800
TWA Ex. 87 (TWA Annual Report—1954) ....... AX-805
TWA Ex. 88 (TWA Annual Report—1955) ....... AX-814
TWA Ex. 89 (TWA Annual Report—1956) ........ AX-819
TWA Ex. 90 (TWA Annual Report—1957) ....... AX-822
TWA Ex. 91 (TWA Annual Report—1958) ........ AX-842
TWA Ex. 92 (TWA Annual Report—1959) ........ AX-854

TWA Ex. 93 (TWA Annual Report—1960) ........ AX-856

iv

Trem

TWA Ex. 94 (TWA Annual Report—1961) —...

.

’ ‘TWA Ex. 96 (TWA Annual Report—1963)

TWA Ex. 128 (Pan American Annual Report—
1959)

TWA Ex. 132 (Pan American Annual Report—
1963)

TWA Ex. 155 (AAL Annual Report—1958)
TWA Ex. 158 (AAL Annual Report—1961) —..
TWA Ex. 159 (AAL Annual Report—1962) ....
TWA Ex.'184 (UAL Annual Report—1959) _.
TWA Ex. 186 (UAL Annual Report—1961) —.
TWA Ex. 187 (UAL Annual Report—1962) ...

TWA Ex. 192 (TWA Prospectus, 5/25/61 & Sup-
plement, 6/20/61)
TWA Ex. 194 (TWA Prospectus—6/17/57) ....»-
TWA Ex. 223 (Pan American Prospectus—
7/3/45—Supplement—7/24/45)
‘TWA Ex. 249 (American Airlines Prospectus—
6/11/46—Supplement—6/24/46)
TWA Ex. 257 (TWA-Toolco Lease Agreements
—Boeing Jets)
TWA Ex. 264 (Toolco-Lockheed Purchase
Agreement—L-1449A—12/23/54)

TWA Ex. 266 (Toolco-Lockheed Purchase
Agreement—L-1049G—9/26/55)

ITEM

TWA Ex. 267A (Letter, TWA to Toolco—1957
Common Stock Offering)

TWA Ex. 267B (Letter, TWA to N.Y. Trust
Co.—1957 Common Stock Offering) -..............

TWA Ex. 271 (Letter, Tooleo to SEC—1957
Common Stock Offering)

TWA Ex. 275 (TWA Board Minutes—April 26,
1945) r

TWA Ex. 276 (TWA Finance Committee Min-
utes—September 12, 1945)

TWA Ex. 277 (Page from Banking Quotation
Record)

TWA Ex. 278 (TWA Board Minutes—November
8, 1946) --

TWA Ex. 279 (Special TWA Stockholders Meet-
ing—December 23, 1946—Judges’ Report) ......

TWA Ex. 280A (Minutes—Adjourned Special
TWA Stockholders Meeting—December 28,
1946)

TWA Ex. 280B (Adjourned Special TWA Stock-
holders Meeting—December 28, 1946—Judges’

Report)

TWA Ex. 281A (Minutes—Adjourned Special
TWA Stockholders Meeting—December 31,
1946)

TWA Ex. 281B (Adjourned Special TWA Stock-

holders Meeting—December 31, 1946—Judges’
Report)

PAGE

AX-940

Trem

TWA Ex. 282 (Minutes & Judges’ Report—Ad-
journed Special TWA Stockholders Meeting
—VJanuary 6, 1947)

TWA Ex. 283 (TWA Board Minutes—December
18, 1946)
TWA Ex. 284 (TWA Board Minutes—December
27, 1946)
TWA Ex. 285 (TWA Board Minutes—December
28, 1946)
TWA Ex. 287 (TWA Board Minutes—January
9, 1947)

TWA Ex. 288 (Minutes—Adjourned Special
TWA Stockholders Meeting—January 13,
1947)

*TWA Ex. 290 (TWA Board Minutes—June 15,
1948)

TWA Ex. 292 (TWA Proxy Statement—July
15, 1948)

TWA Ex. 293 (TWA Prospectus—2/18/49 &
Amendments—3/8/49)

TWA Ex. 313 (Debt Outstanding & Available to
TWA & Competitors—1961-63)

TWA Ex. 314 (Weighted Average Interest—
TWA & Competitors—1960-63)

TWA Ex. 319 (Least Squares Analysis—S.H.E.
Avg. Stage Length—B-331s)

ITEM
TWA Ex. 320 (Least Squares Analysis—S.H.E.

Avg. Stage Length—CV-880s)
TWA Ex. 321 (Least Squares Analysis—S.H.E.
Avg. Stage Length—B-131s)
TWA Ex. 322 (Least Squares Analysis—S.H.E.
Avg. Stage Length—B-131Bs)
TWA Ex. 328 (S.H.E.—Passengers Added/
Deleted—Reoonstructed TWA)

TWA Ex. 331 (TWA Historical Load Factors—
CV-880s—1962-1963)

TWA Ex. 336 (Comparison TWA Int'l vs. PAA-
Atl.—1959)
TWA Ex. 345A (Price Waterhouse Comparison
—C. & C. and S.H.E. (Revised) )
TWA Ex. 351 (1965 CAB Handbook of Airline
Statistics)
TWA Ex. 355 (Comparative Profit Study—
TWA with AAL & UAL)

TWA Ex. 356 (Comparative Profit Study—
TWA with All Other Domestic Trunks) ..........

TWA Ex. 399 (Comparison, TWA Actual Jet
Load Factors vs. S.H.E. Marginal Passenger
Mile Factors)

TWA Ex. 401 (TWA B-131 Load Factors—
April-July 1959)

TWA Ex. 420 (Price Waterhouse Comparison—
C. & C. (Revised) and S.H.E.)

PAGE

AX-1066

AX-1067

AX-1068

AX-1069

AX-1071

AX-1072

AX-1073

AX-1107

AX-1108

AX-1110

AX-1112

AX,1113

AX-1114

Irem
TWA Ex. 423 (Late Evening Flightse—-TWA
1961-1963)
TWA Ex. 424 (Cargo v. Passenger Revenue—
TWA Late Evening Flights)
TWA Ex. 426 (Comparison of Selected A/C
Numbers from S.H.E. Appendix A)
TWA Ex. 431 (Profitability of TWA A/C by
Month—Computer Print-out)
TWA Ex. 432 (Profitability of TWA A/C by
Month—Chart)
TWA Ex. 435 (Regression Analysis—Random
Numbers)
TWA Ex. 436A (Regression Analysis—Random
Numbers)

TWA Ex. 436B (Regression Analysis—Random
Numbers)

TWA Ex. 436C (Regression Analysis—Random
Numbers)
TWA Ex. 440 (Graph Illustrating Testimony of
Prof. Hare)
TWA Ex. 441 (Regression Experiment—
3/23/68)
TWA Ex. 444 (C. & C. Tabulation—Additional
TWA Domestic Seat-Miles)

ix

Volume AX-IV
ITEM
DX4 (Tooleo Order—30 P.&W. JT3C4 Engines,
2/14/56)
DX5 (Letter—Toolco to P.&W. re Jet Engine
Orders, 2/14/56)
DX6 (Tooleo Order—90 Additional P.&W.
JT4A-3 Engines, 2/15/56)
DX7 (Amendment—Toolco Order for 300 P.&W.
Jet Engines, 9/7/56)
DX8 (Letter—P.&4W. to Rummel re 300 Jet
Engines, 9/7/56)
DX10 (Letter—Rummel to Collings re Boeing
707, 1/12/55)
DX11 (Notes of Convair Negotiations—March
24, 1955)
DX15 (Draft C.&C. Report—TWA Financial
Forecast 1959-61)

DX19 (Page from Aviation Week, Jan. 10,
1955)

DX22 (American Aviation, June 20, 1955, pages
21-23)

DX26 (American Aviation, Sept. 12, 1955, pp.
84-85) |

DX27 (American Aviation, Oct. 10, 1955, p. 68)

DX28 (Pages from American Aviation, Oct. 24,
1955)

PAGE

ITrem
DXK29 (Aviation Week, Oct. 17, 1955, p. 7) -......

DX31 (American Aviation, Nov. 7, 1955, pp.
23-25, 27-28)

DX40 (TWA Board Minutes—June 21, 1961) ....

DX43 (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W.
Rummel)

DX44 (Letter of Damon, Dec. 6, 1955) -.............
DX45 (Letter—Leslie to Dietrich, Dec. 19, 1955)
DX46 (Letter—Dietrich to Ayers, Dec. 21, 1955)

DX47 (Boeing-Tooleo Purchase Agreement—
8 B-131s, 1/10/56)
DX48 (Teletype—Boeing to Toolco re B707-
131s, 11/11/56)
DX51 (Boeing Offer of B707-320s to Toolco,
1/6/56)

DX53 (Transcript of Telephone Conversation—
Rummel & Connelly, 12/20/57)

DX54 (TWA Board Minutes—June 26, 1959) ....
DX57 (The Huntington Report—1960) ...............

DX62 (TWA Fleet Requirements 1961-70, dated
3/1/61)
DX63 (TWA Financial Forecast 1959-61, dated
5/15/59)
DX64 (Letter to Thomas, dated 5/6/59) .......... s

4

PAGE
AX-1218

AX-1219
AX-1224

AX-1229
AX-1369
AX-1378
AX-1382

_ AX-1385

AX-1390

_ AX-1391

AX-1393
AX-1402
AX-1410

AX-1420

AX-1433
AX-1438

Ire
DX65 (TWA Staff Engineering Report re Jets

& Turboprops—4/19/56)

DX66 (Toolco-Boeing Contracts—B707-131s,
3/2/56)
DX67 (Toolco-Boeing Contracts—B707-331s,
3/19/56)
DX68 (Toolco-Convair Contracts—CV-880s,
9/10/56)

DX71 (Rummel Memo re TWA Equipment Pro-

gram, 3/15/61)
DX72 (Telegram—Bew to Rummel—2/27/61) ....
DX73 (Letter—Leslie to Holliday—3/20/61) ....
DX74 (Letter—Leslie to Holliday—4/3/61)

DX77 (Letters—Tooleo to TWA re Financing
Additional Jets, 6/9-10/61)
DX78 (Letter—TWA to Holliday re Financing
Proposals, 6/16/61) ;
DX79 (Pan American-Boeing Purchase Agree-
ment—B707-120s, 10/13/55)

DX81 (Pan American-Boeing Purchase Agree-
ment—B707-321s, 12/19/55)

DX85 (Boeing-AAL Purchase Agreement—
B707-123s, 3/1/56)
DX95 (Allen Letter Announcing Boeing Jet,
Nov. 19, 1954)

DX96 (Boeing Offer to Sell ‘Pan American 25
B-120s, 6/23/55)

PAGE
AX-1440
AX-1445
AX-1479
AX-1505

AX-1536
AX-1538
AX-1539
AX-1540

AX-1541
AX-1553
AX-1558
AX-1564
AX-1576
AX-1584

AX-1588

Trem

DX97 gc ire con oe vag da

6/24/55)
DX98 (Boeing Offer to Sell United 15 B-120s,
6/24/55)
DX101 (Boeing 707 Delivery Positions) —.......

Volume AX-V
DX102 (Boeing Memorandum re 707 Over-Ocean
Configuration, 11/2/55)
DX103 (Boeing Memorandum re TWA Delivery
Positions, 12/23/55) -...
DX105 (Boeing Memorandum re Negotiations
with TWA, 7/24/56)
DX106 (Letter—Rummel to Cook re Boeing
Deliveries, 1/28/58)

DX107 (Letter—Rummel to Cook re Boeing
Deliveries, 3/17/58)

DX108 (Letter—Price to Allen re Boeing
Deliveries, 3/30/58) --
DX109 (Letter—Tooleo to Allen reillibeing
Deliveries, 5/8/58)
DX116 (Rourke Memo to Rummel re CV-880
Deliveries, 1/15/60)
DX120 (TWA Memorandum re CV-880 Deliv-
eries, 10/2/59)

DX122 (Bew Memorandum to Cannady re CV-
880 Deliveries, 12/18/59)

PAGE

AX-1591

AX-1594
AX-1597

AX-1601

AX-1606

AX-1608

AX-1611

AX-1615

AX-1618

AX-1621

AX-1623

AX-1624

AX-1625

Irem
DX124 (Parmet Memorandum to Rourke re CV-

880 Deliveries, 1/13/60)

DX125 (TWA Memorandum re CV-880 Deliv-
eries, 1/22/60)

DX127 (Rummel Memorandum to Rourke re
Integration of CV-880s, 2/8/60)

DX128 (Letter—Rourke to Digges re Specifica-

tion Modifications, 4/7/60)

DX130 (Bew Wire to Rourke re Convair Delays,
5/27/60)

DX135 (Letter—Convair to Bew re CV-880 De-
livery, 1/6/61)

DX137 (Telegram—Bew to Rummel re Convair
Delays, 2/16/61)

DX139 (Letter—Convair to Bew re Convair

Delays, 3/16/61)

DX142 (Letter—Convair to Rourke re CV-880
Deliveries, 7/11/61)

DX143 (Letter—Rourke to Convair re CV-880

Deliveries, 8/2/61)

DX146 (Letter—Convair to Toolco re Model 30
Delivery Positions, 5/6/60) ..

DX148 (Toolco—General Dynamics Letter
Agreement re 6 Model 30s, 7/14/60) -..............

DX152 (Tooleo—General Dynamics Letter
Agreement re Additional Model 30s, 9/6/60)

PAGE

xiv

- Trem
DX156 (Telegram—Beall to Allen, et al. re
PAA Negotiations, 9/28/55)

DX168 (Boeing Memorandum re Conversations
with Howard R. Hughes, 9/23/55)

DX169 (Boeing Memorandum re Conversation
with Howard R. Hughes, 10/31/55) —............

DX170 (Telegram—Boeing to Toolco re B707-
331s, 7/21/59)
DX218 (C.&C. Letter to Leslie re TWA Finan-
cial Forecast, March 13, 1959)

DX219 (TWA Financial Forecast 1958-1962,
dated 12/1/58)

DX237 (Aviation Week & Space Technology,
11/13/61, pages 42-43)

DX239 (Airlift, May 1962, p. 46)

DX254 (TWA Board Meeting, Aug. 16, 1961—
Report of System General Manager) ..............

DX255 (Statement of CAB Chairman” Boyd,
Jan. 29, 1960)

DX257 (Aviation Week, 1/30/61, pp. 36-37) —

DX258 (Report to Directors of TWA—Oct. 13,
1961) ;

DX259 (CAB Order of Investigation—Dec. 28,
1961)

DX260 (Letter—Tillinghast to CAB, Jan. 29,
1962)

PAGE

AX-1657

AX-1658

AX-1660

AX-1661

AX-1664

AX-1666

AX-1671
AX-1673

AX-1674

AX-1677
AX-1681

AX-1683

AX-1694

AX-1703

ITEM

DX262 (Revised Pages 70-73 of TWA Ex.

4(c)(1))
DX270 (Report of Loeb, Rhoades & Co.) ............
DX271A (S.H.E. Report (Revised)—Volume

One)

DX271B (S.H.E. Report (Revised)—Volume

Two)

DX284 (TWA Prospectus—Nov. 20, 1952)
DX286 (TWA Board Minutes—Jan. 13, 1955) ....
DX287 (TWA Board Minutes—Dec. 13, 1955) ....
DX289 (TWA Board Minutes—April 26, 1956) ..

DX290 (Tooleo-TWA Conditional Sale Con-
tract—L-1049Gs, 6/6/56)

Volume AX-VI

‘DX292 (Tooleo-TWA Conditional Sale Con-
tract—L-1649As, 4/19/57)

’ DX321 id. (CAB Orders & Documents)

DX322 id. (CAB Orders & Documents) .............

DX323 id. (CAB Orders & Documents) .............
Volume AX-VII

DX334 (Correlation Coefficients—Substituted

8.H.E. Table G-VII)

DX339 (B-120s Available to AAL, Actual vs.
Reconstructed—1959)

PAGE

AX-1708
AX-1712

AX-1789

AX-1859
AX-1961
AX-1967
AX-1970
AX-1974

AX-1979

AX-1995
AX-2012
AX-2191
AX-2347

xvi

&

Ire
DX341 (Domestic Carriers—Jets Assigned to
Service, 1959-63)
DX342 (TWA’s Share of Jets Assigned to Do-
mestic Service, 1959-63)
DX348 (Revised Summary—Categories of Dif-
ferences—Wemple vs. Simat)
DX358B id. (CAB Form 41 Reports—Northeast
Airlines, 1957-1966)
DX358C id. (CAB. Form 41 Reports—PAA,
1957-1966)
DX359A (Supplemental 8.H.E. Report—Volume
A)

DX364 id. (Excerpts from Deposition of Emmett
O. Cocke) ae A

-

DX367 (Combined Non-Stop Scheduled Fre-
quencies Per Week—Aug. 1958-63) ................

DX368 (Combined Non-Stop Scheduled Fre-
quencies Per Week—Aug. 1958-63) -.............

DX371 (Summary—Categories of Differences—
Wemple vs. Simat (Supplemental)) ................

DX379 (Domestic Jet Seat Miles—Wemple vs.
Historical)

PAGE

4, page 1 2 ef
(too co Order - 30 P, & W. IT3C-4 Engines, 2/14/56) 2

Fobruar:; 14> 1956

Kes: Purchase Ajreemoent for Pratt &
Whitney Aircraft JT3C-4 Turbdojot
Enginey

Pratt & Wuitney Aircraft Division
United Aivoraft Corporation
Kkuntsci:ler Pield

Last Nartford 8, Connecticut

Gontlenen:s
Huyhes Tool Compan; hereby places a fira order with

“ou for tuirty (30) Turbojet Engines on the followir.,; terms
ai:d conditions:

(1) Engine Model .

j -- P&WA Aircraft Model JT3C-4 engine wit). standard
equipment in accordance witi. Pratt @ Whitney aircraft speci-
a No. 1712 dated June 22, 1955, revised Auzaot 16,

55.

(2) Unit Het Price |

; $145,009.00 with etanderd equipment F.0.3. Last
Rartford, Connecticut.

(3) Gquantit,
T: irt, (30) en;;inea.

(4) sipping Sci.cdule

Enginos arc: to be acieduled for s.iijxacnt cetwecn
Jul, 2, 1953 and December 31, 195), wit: a more dotailed
delivery schedule to be mutuall, a)reed upon. / ,

~ TASS¢

o-oo oe

ae
Fh

ye a
x ee 8
SL a

pe 2 - Pratt & Wiitney Aircraft Division =- February 1y, 1056.

ico rder - 30 P, & W. JT3C-4 Engines, 2/14/56)

(5) Payment Tors

(a) Five per cent (53) with. order,

(n) Fifteen per cent (15%) additional nine (9)
months in advance of scl.eduled adeliverics.

(c) Balance within the usual thirty (30) day :
priod after deliver; of tne engines. -

(6) Conditions of: Salc

It is understood that this order is subject to your
standard conditions of sale and to release by ti:c United ~
cegtes Government. As a further condition to this oxdcr,
Hugues Tool Company arrees that 4f it sells or lcnds the
engines to Trans World Airlines, Inc.;,it will require Trans
Vorld Airlines, Inc., in consideration of the extension to
it bx Hughes Tool .Coiupany of ti.e provisions of United Air-
craft Corporation's standard sales warranty, to agree to
release and dischar:e Huyhes Tool Company and United Air-
ereft Corporatio: froa an; and all liabilities and obligs-
tions whatsoever arising out of tre purchase or use of such
engines except as expressly assumed by United Aircraft
Corooration in said warrant;.

(7) Retrefit Plan

You will :sake available to us sometime after July l,
1360, by means of your usual "50-0/0 Ceompairn Chane" pro-
cedure, the muterlal necessary to retrofit t::e JT3C-4 engines
W@ qualii'y those engines for the sane static sea level take-
off 4: rust as: the JT3C-5; provided that we notif. you to tli.at
effect prior to ti:e expiration of tic "JT3C- Overhaul Material

Gost Plan". ,
(3) Overhaul Material Cost Plan

"i

You agree to extend to us your "JT3C Overhaul Mater~
Cost Plain", wiich establishes a cciling, on engine over=
ial paterial cogis during, tne early operation of JT3C tur-
bing cn jines.

ak (3

74300

AX-1180 .
DX 4, page 3 —
(Tooleo Order - 30 P, & W. JT3C-h Engines, 2/14/56)

Pase 30 = Pratt 2 Widtucy Airerast Division - February 14, 1956

(5) It 1s understcod that we will negotiate a zeneral
terms agreement whic: agreement when nesotiated may bn sub-
stituted bry mutual consent for te standaml condltious of
gale, ;

(10) It is expressly uaderstood tit these engincs are
being, hought for resale to and use by Trans World Airlines,
Inc., and “rans t.orla Airlines must accept ti.w varranty dis-
claimer set forti. in Parasraph (6). abcove.

Enclosee herewith is our check including the five
per cent (5%) down pa,ment for tiis order.

Yours very truly,

HUGHES TOOL COMPASY

“7eDX 5, p
a Letter -

age 1

, Toolco to P. & W. re Jet Engine Orders, 2/14/56)

February 14, 1956

Re: Furchase of Jr3C~4 and JT4A-3
Engines

Pratt « whitney Aircraft Division
United Aircraft Corporation
Rentschler Field

prst Hartford 8, Connecticut

Attemtion.. Mr. Le C. Mallet

Genticmen:

Vouay Hughos Tool Company has placed orders for 3C
JT3CH4 engines una 166 JT4A-3 engines. In connection with
those orders Hughes Tool Company desires additionsl agree-
ments, which are rot proposed us conditions to the orders
but which are submittea in the belief that they will be
favorably consicered by you. They are as follows:

1. The JT3C-4 engine will be C.A.A. certified
for use at 15,3CO lbs. of thrust and will be war-
rantec for such use after an initial period not to od
exceec one (1) year from time of certification of
the first comuercisl trausport equipped with such
engine. Prior to the expiration of such perioc, it
is your intention to limit the warreljy for use at
14,00C lbs. thrust.

2. If, after negotietion, United Aircreft
Corporstion extends to Trans “orla Airlises, Inc.,
or any of its other commercial customers more) favor-—
eble warranty, conditions \\then contained in the stanc-
aru séles warranty seb in ig purchase frdete, |
\

are .4 | e ; (\ \ |
“74863

Zz : : bad *. Cy ‘

- . - Popest aa Aes Towa. ew e ;
: |
err aa eoseganstiy
HUE 2.5 OO0n Cw.ee ae
“t-%5 *;
by: Saye: Lon8 hes ollidey
‘ Vics Prosidcns
.
a3 ¢ :
/ .
’
’
‘ o _
. ® . '
. “e
1 \ ‘
| 4
\ » . i 3 \ \ pl
\ a:
. 2 me
. " . ‘ A . ‘
‘ . 4” A>)
re . ‘ : e

e AA-L iL

- (Amendment - Toolco Order

DX 7

for 300 P. &W. Jet Epo.
Engines, 9/7/56) F

PRATT & WHITNEY AIRCRAFT

DIVISION OF UNITED AIRCRAPT CORPORATION

EAST HARTFORD A CONNECTICUT, U.S.A.
CABLE Afonsss WUuRC Hart”

“September 7, 1956 —

Hughes Tool Company’
Exccutive Offices
22nd Floor Gulf Building
Houston 2, Texas

Attention: Mr. Ce lie Price, Vice President
Gentlemens

This will confirm the recent conversation between Mr. R. W. Rumasl
of Trans World Airlines and our Mr. Frank DuLyn concerning the
final distribution of jet engines which you now have on order,

Your orders are evidenced by ycur letter of February 14, 1956 for
$0 JT3C-4 (J57) engines, your letter of February 14, 1956 for 18

JT4A-3 (375) engincs and your telegram of February 15, 1956 for %

JT4A-3 (J75) engines. Hence, there is a total of 300 jet engines
on order which includes 270 J75 and 30 J57 engincs.

It is our understanding that you desire to change such orders by
increasing to 66 the number of J57 engines and by reducing to 24
the number of J75 engines. This change in the final engine dise
tribution is acceptable to us.

If the foregoing is satisfactory to you please heve an suthorize
official of your company sign one of the duplicate originals of
this letter. Upon receipt by us of one of the duplicate original
so signed, we shall regard this as a binding amendment to each of
the orders referred to above.

Very truly yours,
UNITED AIRCRAFT CORPORATION

. Parkins, encral Ms | ger
t & Whitney Aircraft Divisie

\ |

vers Mr. ©. H. Price, Vice Pr. ident .°” Cc a
Hushes Tool Company oY A
2214 Floor Gulf Ruild4 ng oat:
* 8 Hanatan 9 avo ey Rd N\
; ors é 5 ©
EE (letter - P. &W. to Rummel re 300 Jet Engines, 9/7 /56) 1) ’
. oo September 7, 195

we, R, W. Re=mol, Chief Fngineer
moa World Lixrlinss, Ins,

0 Rehards Road

eoag City 5, Missouri

dear Bods

Thic will confira cur talcph=ne convcrontion Guring thich you pro~
ius with the final cictribution of J57 cd J75 ergines on order for

3 you Ica, tho orders cro ovidorscd by a lcttor fren Faghcs Tool
opmy of Fcoriary 14, 1953 {o> LO JTSC~4 (J57) eagines, a Istter from
wgheg Tool Company of Fobrmmry 14, 1983 fer 150 4-35 (J75) carinoo and

taleeran from lughes. Tool Caxzpany of Februcry 15, 1953 for 90 JNie3
‘eginss. —
o}

Tt ic my wmdorstending that it is your ¢csire that Huzhos Tool Coxpany
ng Sach coccrs by increasing to 63 tho muabew of J57 cnsinss and t7 row
uclng C0 254 tho nundcr of J75 cngines and co I aloo indicated to you, this
5 s@escablo to us. In ordcs to mke this arrazycscat con tractuclly effose
Met havo written a letter to lighes Tool Coxpany along tho linss intie
to

Melptave ond requestca Heghcs Gign a duplicate copy, theroby cosnding
Mm Gore iecusd to us by Fughsa

nl aw tolephens conversation, yo indicated that THA dssincs to

A whe
aa

mginos, {£35 I points’ cud to YOU, Gach Ca ciroagesoms would cot bo

we bls to w2 ord, in fcst, would to hiculy wadcsisahleo, It is oren dh oey on |
nt ¥ mM give ua your realistic dolivery requirceats to Oca if it is ms
4, 9 for us t roct btoso in @ normal roumr, We must, ef coarce, reocne
Me Gpliccting ordars botzoon Uecing and Twa,

Beat rogarts,
} Vary truly youra,

VATID ARCRAT omPoRmon | |!
Pratt & Whitey Atrorcty |

?, W. Dalya | \ | | | | |
Al ; a Chef = Comareial Salco gee

7, “4 eee

LA (Letter-Rummel to Collings re Boeing 707, 1/12/55) ; ;
EXHIT (£2 | ee TNO CSI iy

tte. Re W. Rummel
206 Airport Building ur, aA
Kansas City, lUissouri ae: Kansas City, Missouri

Jamary 12, 1955

i:

X rot with Booing roprosontatives Kon Gordon and #112 Taylor Monday morning, .
January 10, in Dotroit and with Goorzo Sohairor Monday afternoon, ak

Booing is nost anxious to ontor into active specification negotiations with Tah é
this tino. fhile Booing ropresontativeos aro in no position at the monont te.”
finalizo any businoes arrangoronts, thoy, novortheless,_are anxious to design tis

cocmoroial 707 to moot as many roquirononts of major potontial customers ag;
practical, — a

. Booing spooification conferences have boon under way with Pan Acorican for neath.
two wooks, Booing is anxious to recoive comaen{/s fron Tak not only as a -potent
custonor but since we operate both internati and donostic sorvico. This ox

‘ ence places us in a good position to indicate feaconable airplane dea

ign “ORDE
to boat catisfy both requircaents. Boeing sifhas to yrocoed with TuA specificet
conforonces within the next two ; yg :

" I told tho Booing representatives thot oe ad would like very much to go over
Booing 707 specifications in detail, we hid been conrdttsd to certain work on th
West Coast which would sake this ic ractiosl on a large-scale basis for perhaps

long as two nonths. however 7 I vould bej glad to go over the specifi

twonty-five jets it wants!
Pan Anerican's Juan fi

@ for a reasonable number of conpetitin
the probable uate of the 14494 annoux

Natta!»

- *
a . - BS

ana DX 11, page 1 ~ ie
ram (Notes of Convair Negotiations-March 24, 1955) . sme

.

4) SORELESELEAL = US 3 Peep
a CP atte TT ak 4 tn ae dad Aires a
Boss Baconn or jmcontarions CME ON EAL

79h gl... UASH_COBVAIE 3 oe |
i ie ae . CGERONCLOGICAL

i in San Diego on Saturday, larch 19, toward avening. Yarly evening I tela~
idack Zovaly to cake arrangomonts for moating either that evening or Sunday to
russ the over-all] situation. Jack indicated ha could not get his people tosether
yeh short notice for a Sunday nmanting but that he mould be ready to go Monday
We did not disouss the over-all cituation to any xeterial axtant.

oday evening ve mat with Zovelys at th Loomis’ at which tine arrangzenonts for
y woeting were confirmed tut little was said about the deal. Monday worning,
h Zy I met Zevely in the dining room at which time we briefly discussed the deal.
vationed, as I knew, that thirty sirplanos were to be involvsd, that the price
4950,000 each, and that dolivary wns intended during the niddle of 1953, but
atirnation of dolivery 4atos would await word from Fort forth, which was
witonday afternoon. Jack «xplained that the present plan was for tha airplanes

abt ic Fort dorts wits Port dort. catail anginesring tut with San Diego

@lingprelininary design ard rore or less governing tha project. Jack said Bayless
: ‘7 tting in touch with wu» shortly for a meeting Monday morning.

ess called about haif an hour later and discussed plans for the meting.
was arrangad at the La Jollian for 9:20, ‘a’ph said the following men
project at Convair besides himself:

Kt

Frank tase (predesign) : .
Art Carloff (tho handled the interior and preview drawings)
Crawford Truex (weight man)

Al hidler (aro) ee
Jack Donaldson (Who worke for Zevely)

Dick waldo (Bho ulso works for Zavely. Waldo has not
baen involved in the affair to any material
axtent since the Baverly :lills meating.)

tin at the La Jollian started about 9:30 and was attended by the followings |

Ralph Bayless -
“rawford Truex

Gill Brown '

Bob Rummel

aed that the best way to proceed would be per my conversation with Zevely -
meng; that ie, wa would try to write a brief, preliminary, goneral objective «-
mGtioation which would o¢ folloved by the preparation of a detailed specifi-

mang @ sixty or ninety day period subsequent to signing the eeiky bet
act... Tha Preliminary contract as discussed wi Zavely would protably be in
B—| probably a lett r| type agreensnt '—. which would portray @asence

Be) at abd perait aprroval by Convair's Board at| the h 31 mooting, Zevely
| E 48 people prepere a shore forn of coun et for f view.
f atte 2.)

a Bi West on Sumlay and advised him of the probable naed of his presence
this week ani confirmed this Monday avening at which tice he stated he |
about uidn! ght 'Suasday for a Wednesday aaating here, after whici: he

AX-1188 DX 11, page 2
Notes of Convair Negotiations-March 24, 1955)

GQKHELRSETLAL

would have to sini tha ATbuquerqua hearing on Thursday and Friday, but that he
would raturn to La Jolla for Saturday and Sunday, In the avent the Albuquarme. .
hearing continuss into Monday, ha will be there at that time and return following
the hearing to La Jolla for continuation of discussione if necessary.

I discusesd West's prasence with Collings by telephone and gave his very briat de,
forz:ation on the datails on Monday morning at which time he also confirnad that
West should attend the Albuquerque hearing.

I did not montion sarliar that one of the cen who attonded tha conf arence, Bild §
was new to the project ond bis work ia specifications. :

Hughes called Saturday :vening asking for expedited handling of the contract ané.
apecifications, Hughes agreod at that tire that the brief form of specification: ©
- and contract I suggested wae exactly what he would like to have. He also called
Monday morning again pointing out the naed for urgont handling in view of tha :
situation and asked that we zake ar sffort to find out what the CAA would requires

‘the way of pre-sarvise airplane testing, since tir. Coilings had indicated to hint

it might run. as much es a yser, Now, the Lockhead situation is critioal with
te timing since the Lockheed mamgement turned down the Lockhend Sales Departzent
effort to build the 1049G fuselage on the new wing. Schwartz resurrected this pla
on the basis of higher cost and on the basis that hs could also sell KLM. Hoveve,!
KLM was to make ite decision by Monday, arch 21. I have not heard what Kid
if anything, on that date and understand now there is still a possibility that
Lockheed gay wish to continue with this project. This airplane would be ocompetitt
with the DC-7C on speed and could be as conpatitive on range and would be availa)

for use during the Surmr of 1957. The Convair projact could be available, sbjed

to confirmation by Fort Worth, for use during 1958, provided the CAA did not
extonsive route testing. The original schedule called for final certification by
July of 1958 and initial certification by March of 1958, The first flight was = |
scheduled twenty-sevan sonths fron go abead, which, whan originally set, was Jum,
1957. Now, Convair plans to have sixteon airplanes completed by the end of July

80 presumbly upon receipt of final certification, operations could comsence rapid
because pilot training could have teken place prior to that time. Convair has
included in its time astimata 60C hours for CAA accelerated service tests and 30.
houre for airline service tests. I agresd with Hughes to send a ran to Washingt
_to find out whet he could about curront CAA thinking on requirezents for initial
"Jet transport operations, He agreed this was the test method, provided it was;
done in @ way which would not causo the CAA to become suspicious as to our activi
poe ofa Roe I called Rourke and aeked hia to go to Washington to contact
Konecany of the CAS and Henry feoke of the CAA on other ratters, bringing this -.
subject into tha conversation cleverly and adroitly so as to avoid thease aan st
any significance to the gu«stion other than hon-st planning curiosity, |
Rourke was instructed to talk to Konacany about the international rege
lation picture, about Malloy’s activities on jat transport regulations, and te
lead into the discussion at hand, after which he was to call me. Rourke

leave Kansas City Monday afterncon 1 ead Ripe opt pera dhe le see

ie

until | Tuesday edvi of the and |
that ; the tate of rer Sout “toring ern the 5
fa vat md. I thought th sc) aha good mot

i -2, ke Maaeie

onior Vice President-Finence end Treasurer ;
Trend Vorld Airlines, Ince :
339 Madison Avenus pee

Lov Yor 17; ear Yous eal

"Dear tre Lealtes

‘In accontance with your request, we heve gato, & ctuly o? Tiny 3

Finanetal Forecast dated Baz 15, 1959 for 1959-1962, the plea of opera
+ Watch is tha basis for this: ss gmt the prenises uscd for the estizetes

waich comprise the Forecast ioreted peytineat ‘iniustry data. Fron this stuly,
¥o are of opinion that the: Finoneiel Forecast £3 a reccoasble expectation

— ecch of these — eens 1929-298, for tho Latento’ plo of ¢

og: PLAT 2 ere

- The principal elemeat of TIA's ples of cpcration 4s the mnches
type of atreraft operctei. At tha end of the year 1958, PIA bed a total ¢

"189 pisten-cazine atrerart tr its fleet. Ca March 20, 1959, the Airline «

mencel corvice with a jet-encine cixcratt, end by the ent of 190 expects

tave NS Jet aircraft in service ana to have retirol a nuzver of pistes ¢

craft. Tho principal cheracteristics of TiA"s otreraft fects of 1958 sai
proposed for 1961 are shown dy the toble on the folloving page. ‘the sect
table following shovs the oxpectad schelule of traasitiog of tho flect,.y
fiscal. aes ae 1999 ont 19.

et
ag

3 a
%

rem
be r4 mae

DX 15, page 2
&-C. Report-TWA Financial Forecast 1959-61) DRAP?

oeee

misines
PS To deee’ Vaya, a
Tio 3D6 BSE Fiwst Ecenony

Piste, 2

“Sctstrea3* . && ko
Swer H'Constelictiog = Pistca -- OF
Swer CO Coustellaticg 8G Pistoa 33 39
Sizer Constellation =«ss§ Piste, Oy ADDITIONS AND RETIREMENTS OF TWA'S AIRCRAFT, 1959-1960

a ee _"_Ghanges in Fleet(B) =
Aircraft Inventory Quarters 1959; Quarters 1960
——___ SELA/D Ist “and: 3rd btm ast ond 3rd ht

cas pea a _ Additions ae

bey Jet es . . : ;
oe ac eee See ee ae ee
', *BeJOT-331 - - - - 2 . oo, ee :
. Al i - - - 1 eo -6 a

Total” - ao & pss $m 2
Stee ot, A : Retirements(&) -*

: 8 esa, OR ed a 2 as
L-1049H Mee st, oe Se ee 5
L-1049¢ ” 9 = al ne asin eee cae oF we 8 “8
' Tok —§ Re cae peel sl. Ut}
Total + a a Soe ae e' es ;

be Gs WA's Jot Fleet oo. a an ¢ ee
; Bile, Theat so : 575 mR
3 HO ma

3-70 Sed
Rooing Sans Bae

Conctitors’ Jot Plents - : er ee
a Locing and Convoix eocels Boas oxe identical -
ae with the ge 1s

3 ti — 0s passenger contort ond attractiveness end nenstep rengo_ ; -
. eamporacd, avatledle data on ecating Plons, interior dincasions, pleng . _
deorat ion ona arreageneats of the plone interiors el performance expece . :

# tniteato that SUA's Jet fleet cen te es attractive to Potential aig
, th cimties toe dhe yp competitors’ ject oirératt,

IPAM AIT VAL, os0 face competition froa the Lockheed 1-188
mivhich 43 used by Ancrican Airlines and Eestorn Atrlincs oa routes also =
aly BIA. tho Electra is a 360—ph turtoprop etrerest, having a ers turbine
yo) Heat which drives a coaventional propeller end aupplics 25 por cent addi .

sa by jet thrust. A review of TiA's proposed ‘echodules indicates |

Hie metre wnt cocpeting with SA's Convaty 680 Jot end the Lockheed . XK
0 (piston). Tha Convair 890 jet chould have a comoetitive elventoca over

i. $ Sema couperative cdveatace does not exist Lor
Mestre, but ATP the L-10190, TWA plens to use the 110406 shortoy

ast the Electra for shorter

: a 4g 4 DX 15, page 7 2
veer C. & C. Report-TWA Financial Forecast 1959-61)

Route 2 Cort ification”

re Jnother principal feature of Tan's ‘ei of operation 4s the cate,
tol natuse af the zoutea Vhich THA 15 certificated to opereta, this ¢ its
tion bolts by the Uattet States ani foroten Governaate. This ric com
_*matel coatrol of citics served end routes flewa is expected to continu, ay
- for the oubject Pinénetal Poroceat 4% 1a asowod that the routca oldcitely
. BN Gouda the Fatiod 1979-2962 vita be eascattally eo thay vore tn 94
except thet 4 hoa boca asouned that Anozieaa AtzLincs $d bo cuanto’ oop
pp ge eat ae ral
fe iy lke set other atrLinss, So ontnty ecient
epproval of route chencges such e3 cortification for’ong-raage routes ond
|“ Pernissica to drop cities and routes vith light treffie. ‘THA plens to cat
Madi aoc

ee eee Rectan ene anion, aa

dato two ouctel, Mh copeaneiee, kam cechored end pevrestineaty.

° .
Some ee Meats + ese see - -

* eee Serres cores ee oe

, és & C. Report-TWA Financial Forecast 1959-61) DRAT?

_ Intemational Fit;nto

DX 15, page 15 .
-15 «

+

——- 3
, Treasatlentic Fligats - Surmer Schedlute Plic:ts Por too
: By Routes | 19 Brososat SSE 1903
Lew Yor © Lenten a VY.
-- ®& - g Ws.
Listes : 6
Resa. "2. Q
Modvta 2... 0.
Skazneg . 9
i _: Pronkfurt - 2 )
Boston -
Rr Cont Jot of Total Pistn ss SCA - a:
Per Cont Jet plus Turboprop ; a
wf Totel Piston bof 10% ooh
A) Slovor, DC-6 and 3-377 airezert vith h-engines, ¢
The DC-7 and Super Constellation aircraft.
° Excludes shorter rengs jet and — atrorett ©
‘also on order.

¥rea the above, shoving the percentage of these Jet and turboprop ~
aircraft at sh per cent of the piston aircraft, it aopcars that @ number of a |

nev aircraft have been ordered, el docs not indicate a guntced ~~ ™

= and turboprop seats.

3 It mst be understood that : alti the nev aircraft ore very fost,

." theoretically could produce a tremendous number of available seat-niles,
: ae

Re cee AS public's repeated refusal to accept inconventent departure hours

|

DX 15 page 33
(Draft C. & C. Report-TWA Financial Forecast 1959-61) DRAFT

is expected to ioe to tneliay atrerert, end to prevent practical Utilization

of the theoretical capacity. Tais situation also exists today with pistoa
: atreratt. The air tronsportation industry hos rany excuples of public tnststag
3 on popular departure times. Caleago Midway and New York LaGuardia Airports on
doth seriously congeated Sate the 4 P.4.-6 P.M. period eack aay, dut are not
“at all congested during the niddsy hours. Airlines haye tried nony tioes ofte,
ing midday flights to avoid this peek-hour congeotion, but these flights prove
to have uneconante, Light passenger loads and airlines are forced to continu
noximm departures at the popular hours. :

PASSENGER LOAD FACTOR :

"Passenger looa factor", the iene of scats occupied 7 passen-
gers on revenue ‘flights, ia an importent index of airlines operation. ‘IWA's
historical record of passenger load fectors and those forecast for 1959-196,

for all Donestic fLigita in composite, are as follovss

1956

65-2
65-3

The high load factor Setecen’ for 1959 reflects THA's favorable ca
_- petitive position in having a musber of Jet atreraft in service during the o
_ third ond fourth quarters of 1959, shoad of certain principal ccapetiterts, }
: _ TWA ond Jcorican have been averaying vell over 90 per cent loud factors call

| AX-1205
DX 15, page 38
rt C. & C. Report-TWA Financial Forecast aa DRAFE = 3, -

She variations in the forecast revenues per Se ae ® Listed
on the preceding pare » are the result of small variations in the pientetions :
‘of transatlantic and east a: the Grersys revenue passenger-niles estimated -
fer each year. : | |

Other revenues » those generally frou rail, express, yerkesmee ond

charter services, have deen and are estimated as follows: § .. * :
Sakata | , teieiaakiseks Ax % ‘
Mail, Express Percentage Mail, Express ' Percentage .
Freignt . Change Over ‘Freignt Cnange Over

Csarter and Previous Charter and Previous

‘Year _ Miscellaneous Year Miscellaneous - Year
(Thousands) ee

1952 $13,288 = = Gu 970 oe

r 4953 - 15,070 13.44 - 12,115 : 1.2%

- 195%. : 16,083 6.7 Tate wy ae 13,226 9.2
19595 .* 1h,51% -9.8 , 13,589... 2.4
1956 . .. 15,472 6.5 : 14,392 ae 6.2 ©
~195T_ . 17,925 15-9 13,179 . ; 8.4
1958 - 17,932 - 18,613 - 41.2
Forecast | 7 ake ;
1959 $21,069 17.5% $26,455" hag
t proposed for

1. Froc. our detotled, independent etudy » we are of opinion that the estimates

iF total annual revenue included in TWA’e Financial hase for 1959-19 Sl repre-

BSOnn?, . ety - e iy: Yak eo bel re e =

AX-1206 .
‘No Word from AF—Apparently Doug-
las has convinced Patterson that it
intends to with its commercial

. DCB jet transport even if it loses the

Air Force tanker competition. As of last
Monday, Patterson said Doughs had
ived no word as to how it stood in

.that competition.

However, the manufacturer's commit-
ment would upon release that
the pera could get from the mili-
tary to build a commercial aircraft aside

jet- from tanker-transport production, should

if

i

eFiri

sakieet

Douglas get a USAF order for the jcts.
>No Turboprops—The United chicf
pos want to ~
tu transports arc out of the pi
Seer ares

alk about is - %
aye There is ‘no engine available,”
he told this writer. “We will continue
to buy the present type of aircraft, such

Aviation Weex that .

Patterson said that United is
off its nt flect of piston-cnsied
a “a me —— also dischy
that the airline any i
turboprops for short tale Vey
ing to wear out the Convah, sat
said, and added that United 2
operate such an expensive new ug
into small cities, et:
> About 75 Passengers—He said is
pects the breakeven point on the
mercial DC-8 to be about 524%
regard to seating, he pointels
“There is -_ a debate abou
We would like to sce about 75
gers. Others want to go to i
more.” ‘tee
Patterson belicves United
schedule more flights canying ai
numbcr of passengers and in tht
attract a larger total volume ¢
fewer, highcr-density services.
Concerning the DC8’s Paw
Patterson said “The J57 o that
(1960) will have hundreds of ¢
of hours on it. I have been in
with the military and’ they tel a
the figurcs on maintenance of
gine are very fine.”

me (American Aviation, June 20, 1955, page 21-23) AX-1209 2.

ee ae" : orc S78, : o ioe on w.Y irene be “3 :

pooane yim @emerionn Ae von inde |

Me fi ye ye a none . a ae gs ;
\viatlos Oo ae

é. 2 ca n , a mis m m e . a ° °

es OF luroopreps? Airlines Face Big Decision
© Orders must be Placed within nex? few months | |

*~ 0° American signs $65-million order for 35 Lockheed 310s

° ry vet
va ‘
. e

ROBERT LOEBELSON . "the Pratt & Whitney T34 engine could’ bank company its first AA order since

OE ae ‘s fot mect the required performance the early 1930s when Lockheed Orions |: -

KECUTIVES of the world’s specifications in time. As a result, TWA were used in mail service by what s 7

they had postponed as placed a $70-million ‘order for Model then American Airways.

A . 1649s, using Turbo Compound piston — AA's a tof th :

a gid no i fort "engines, in April. The L-1649 can be’ vhaouncement of the order did
" een t

, not say that the engines used on the
but sho were compelled to fitted with turboprops when they be- Electra would be th

ilabl ‘01 pte c — hp. Allison
anegon we . cgyme available. 8) used in Lockheed’s design
geld gery pisiniats Meanwhile, a report was heard proposal. It was explained that the new

. that Howard Hughes, Principal TWA plane is desig
eane ulant cs within on — ‘stockholder, had started discussing a Figh as 5,000
oe we "Yet transport with Convair Division of Royce RB-109) with iew MOGiiications,
— ; General Dynamics Corp. However, J. G.. Feat f the Electra inc}
mecrican Airlines signed — Zevely, Convair's dircctor of sales and’ - “builtin” loading “steps” {consernna®
a4 5 oF eg enmalilamaiag , Contracts, who admitted that his firm is - ng amp the need for “roil-up” load-

ned to use engincs as -
hp (possibly the Rolls-

‘interested in developing a jet transport - ing ramps), provisions cither to check
Aircrait Co., which lost * for either contenerchit or military use, A

. of carry luggage aboard, interi
d in the AA turboprop ‘sid No discussions have taken place, - “several” inchon neg ap paiced
anounced it would f° “We would be delighted to have the port -now flying and resultant wider
ih construction of the DC-8 . ©pportunity to talk about such an air- seats, and cach seat will have its own
Doce i. % pine with Mr. Hughes, but the rumor table for eating or writing,
ain to follow AA with ordcrs that“Giscussions have already started is ° New soundproofing technicucs ’
Li Y fear future were two other. without foundation.” Ot ‘ ‘will reduce noise: in the cabin per
fay e Paglia pig ei, : e The American order for a turbo- sightsccing windows (20 by 16 inches)
yar Lincs an Prop was the result of a competition in will pive Passengers improved visibility.
=. v3 . which Convair, Douglas, Lockheed and Weather avoidance radar and autopilots
*EAL board chairman E. V. Rick- - Vickers participated (American Avia- will be standard equipment. AA aiso
mxiethas indicated Eastern wants at , Tron, Jan. 31). When the range require- says the. reversing propellers will permit
n or delivered by 1960 * ment was increased from 750 to 2,000 tra to operate from airports
at ae ¢ flying 425450 mph . miles, only the Douglas and Lockheed having 5,000-ft. runways without dii-
gS uD to 2,500 miles. He 7 entries remained. In ordering the Lock- _ ficulty. .
PAE ERDCCTS to alba ~—y L heed model, American (also a tradi- The DC, which may also ‘be
> Se nt sideeene ro ‘al . tional Douglas buyer) gave the Bur- ordered by American, will be_seady for

the turbonrops. EAL's ome -

actbee: on pm ° “(Lockheed Electra Specs .
at, “'7T Design and performance data on the new Lockheed CL-310 Electra, 35 ~

er

ae Of which are to be delivered to American Airlines between the end of 1958
president oo A. a and mid-1959, includé:; .
bated § Next long-range trans- Gross Weight ___# ne g99 pounds
a turbojet and that the Cruising speed . ‘er 400 mph
within the next. Range . Y 2000 miles - ~~
traditionally has Seating capacity 64 plus 6 in lounge
Fuel capacity —_————-——.4178 gallons
pugs cusiomcr, so no onc

- Cargo space —-400 cu. ft. excl. of bagcace space .
it places an order Cargo capacity ; a .

Be

of the Big Four, length 101 ft, 4 in, pepe alee uals ,
had tied to buy Wingspan ae 95 ft.

|

|

|
“
|

‘
{
H
'
i
H

a

|
|
i

DX 22

ization fer a commercial version of
the calveaced 77, a
¢ 4 Dowglas has no chlization to USAF,
7 and theseloze arycars to be in a Posi-
tion t© Celiver tie DC-3 first.
* Like tive Locing KC-135, the
DCS uses ieniz advanced Pratt & Whit-
ney. 57 twrdoje:s raounted in pods.
These engines, Dougias says, will five

the DC-6 4 ersisiny speed of 550 taph. °

The piane wii carry between $0 and
125 passengers.

Overseas version of the DC-$ will
have a maximum gross weight . of
257,069 pounds, the tic model
211,000 pourds. Tice plane will be able
to operaie from present airports “at
costs even lower than current passenger

Air Force Asks $60 RMi8ion More
for Researsif dine Develops

By FRANCIS J. KBENAN

Growing Congroficnal co
over ‘apparents inagécuacics in

research and dgfclopment pr
highlighted by vizorous Hoo
mission chgrSes—has resulted’ in some

force took the first step last

week Avhen it asked the Se ate Appro- f the

+ and development

« Com-. AF

page 3
(American Aviation,

models,” Wiazspan is piven as 134.6
feet, length 140.6 fe t, height, 40.2 feet.
_ Typist Light tines of the Douzlas
jel were piven as New York-Parie 6
hours 32 minuies; San Francisco-New
York 4 houts 43 mminur s; San Fran-
cisco Honolulu 4 hours 23 ininutes.
Thus, the lonz-delayed jet/turbo-
Prop cra has arrived for U.S. and for-
eign flag carriers. Britain took the lead
with the jet Comet and the turboprop
Viscount but the two largest U.S. com-
mercial plane builders have closed the
£3. From here on, Burbank and Santa
Monica arc convinced, the world’s air-
lines will have to ‘start placing their
orders, : eee

MSI

$60 million for “e

C request
ing as it did istration’s
special reg d finance the

KF specgdp in B-52 Prodgctio..
it inciudes authotity to transfer
million from anothe Category into
R & D budget and ragtoration of. a

Comminec ior an \add $10 million House emerge ind cut

: \

Ni en ~ aor Pree o

i. t. : : . 2 ond

a. ~ ° “f .

'y Se ae roa

ty o fe ‘ aud! ig ‘

io 7-7. wg og

i Pid: LSID Ebay 5 Sen ces oT Me

Clee ae 4

OJ Db rt es
Sree.
Ek EEL Ee

arr ot :
© te enee
a 0 nme octane ”

wed Leann, Sptneneres: tne eal Cana |

or”

_)

FiasT PHOTO

*Ppreves for 126,500
nd Penacre’s for 125,050 pounds.

of Douyles DC-78, pictured here with earlier
Sew WRG Sacco tenis titted on Pen American's sircratt. Official citterence between”
DCI an SC-72 is new Wrigat DA4 Turoe Compound engine. PanAm's DC-728s will
have tne eatre-rance tanks, Dut Eastern Air 1s. \s°

i Sress takeot weight, whereas EAL's is epproved for 122,200

standard OC-7, snows

sircraft win-not. PAA's airplene is

SUNE 20, 1955 - ee oe

AMERICAN AVIATION

—s

cd, com- °

while no “new smoncy” is in- -

‘blasted the Defense

Progra

AX-1211

June 20, 1955, page 21-23)

s-the mose did reficct awareness of
growing Soviet sizpower and ecugni-
tion of Con,:ressioaal doults shout the
program,

The Woover Commission report
landed fortwixousty in the ‘midd'c of the

_ Congressional furoz roused by tic firs:,

erypiic Defense Departracnt rejoris May
13 of Sovict gains, The, Commission

. Study, presuinabiy already prepared,

arrived two weeks later. In the mean.
time, several Senators were voicing com-
plaints about U.S. progress in the de-
velopment of advanced aircraft and

- missiles.

Sen. Stuart Symington (D-Mo.)
estimated the USSR was ahead in work
on the “ultimate” “Wtapén, the Inier-
continental Ballistic Missile. Sen. Rich-

-ard Russell (D-Ga.), chairman of the
“A

Services Committee, assezted
that Defense R & D programs were
“too scattered” but “might be suflicicat”
if better coordinated, :

Sen. Henry M. Jacxson (D-Wash.)

_ emphasized qualitative requirements in

secret hearings before his Military Ap-
plications subcommittee of the Joint

Atomic Energy Committee.
Sen. Warren Magnuson (D-Wash.)
enna for its

a

“failure” to recogaize the role of R & D :

in maintaining airpower, which he said
was ins too little training of
scientists and too modest Programs in
developing new weapons and
cedures.

firm and elaborate on these charges. It
warns that “the Armed Services are not
sufficiently daring and imaginative in
their approach to radically new weapons
weapon 4 youmedl It said even

that “informal proddings” by civilian
scientists and technologists accounted for

The Commission ‘emphasizes that
pend Kec on

it. recommends. these
¢ Increased integration of R & D
—=-

things

© Better

* Greatly increased attention to
basic research.
© More effective utilization of the
nation’s scientific and technical com-
munities and private research facilities.
*'An overall strengthening of the
ae, 23:

. . 7°
‘le. 4

Pro-

The Hoover Report appears to con-

its research prozrams. -

personnel policies designed °
_to keep military and civilian experts on

DX 26, page

t

1 ‘ .

* : (American Aviation, Sept. 12, 1955, pp. 84-85)

hi

Kenge activities, these sppears to be | ° ‘ New PANZLOC High Peforscence 7
esas Guestion Waether the penahy im |. Afvevat: Fastener Carvice: ‘
2 on foreign airlines As’ not one - Cinanteveat ¥ 2s ty See ant
sorne OF US, sisline political pressures Serene es — a oka nang EmS ae
tather than of raititary accessity. Zension with Minimun: Detection =
oe Guestion to be fps ‘is: ae ma NMiginy..2 Sneet Separation. - :
vs the policy penatize . engine | - ; :
gotucers in their nerotiations with 3 i ;
foreigs, Operators? 3 has long been { ‘ .
sccepied that Pentagon restrictions on : ‘
US j : tion have been . 2: fe oe
8A Odsincic arasinctusers Compete ; -
ing With Dritish designs, and the arbi- Benet rece ptects momver 2 en siud ‘
‘ ‘ . i *. °
wary penalty imposed dy the new policy oer eae (pee ' in ae
migat wil mean the Gifierence be- ae hata TA + \ 1 ot seizining cing ,
tween, sewetion of U.S. o7 British de- floating tousing foci / shearwasher SO '’”
‘ signs Om sirccait of the ture, © © © .! "wen oh At TS
, rom, ee
‘ ° —
d oom ome | ee ay |
06°C! [te wr on a KM f ae , ‘ ee: or ae
Cul Resumes Nonsked «|. - Bins Ley Lt ik,
. . Ri 4 . 8 am
Wawnfiecs Mimeet [\Mimotian *~ lan x xX 3
eC LS AS. LOC oonmmmase RSs“
Civil _Aetonau;és Board will re- i”
‘ 4 ber $ in the Large _ . atented anc Patent Ap9:.e5 For
Carries _Tavestigation : Announcing high strength, cuick release, rotery type fstene:
aie ss has produced a record | tor ccvances aircraft designs. Availabie in stud-retzined end :
30, age Ror ae nie : Curvecure edeptedie types, in sizes 1 & 2 with fuli fost es -
New hy 3s M4 be on the quali- . Specitice Sy NAS 547. Opens aad closes with cuarter tura, stud :
cations of 30 o: xe G0 nonscheduied ejecuon shows urtoched condition. Easily sressure sezted.
: Mine appucants “Who did not previ. Adjustesie for sheet pica-up in eccordzace with NA 537, thus
else Ae oo, weer m teas ° * bain, ofl tn . : -
duis set an Opporiuniiy to testify ss Simpunying Sud inventory. Catalog and price list belong in your.
9 Biness, aditity, exc. Examiners Ralph file. Sead recvest t eae 5
L. Wiser and Richard A. Waish have : -
witatively schedylod te new hearings WNZLOC,. America’s - : be
ios Washi ga, Los Angeles, ‘and ine of siseratt ek FZ 2 7 F ©) High Pertormance (aS $57) ¢ ) Styia 3 GtiL-FeSSsta)
a W issues Cecision soon on the policy “ “e | © PStrles De RCH -Se54) ¢ ) Rotary Larch
Pree OF Lhe cose in which the nor | pmmensere pemeneans 5: our 0 cunt ane i Seng to, 9 Grey Posteners Hansen
“ued industry's sv for the DOM | peme apews, (M455) Kame. aie Titie.
ee ae | PP BR Oat Fb Company, 7
ong? c te hy : & , !
spattcants wil ff a
‘4 . ° .
i the spot outlined | eras oo ° - ’ .
a Circle Ne, 34 on Reeser Service Cord,
° +
: 8&

wreetue

‘ a)
wee Teen ert.

+ 00s. 0 .
i : a v.
We So cetenes

re Cloictizn-

STE Fe + 97 © MywOr eye

fi ie “ws ee. Vovces Eve i
re x
ays oi] et
eee ail > : if oe ‘
' ? 3 ‘ Y. Ne ’
: eee are. v SO aaeaty eee
ot ; * AMIAtIOX RoOR "
. Mute wf tae “a's”
| . & ARNIS CoNtC2
WEN. SE ee a? A
ROOSEVEUT

o
od

a es

oe

ep
rd

-
oe

"3600 HOLLYWOOD 3L¥D. HOLLYWOOD 28 CALIF
* PHONE HOO-22 © TELETYPE LA MAT
THOS. &. HULL, DIAECIOR

~
Pn men sa

z.

Bae

ed KO! steel |

fe !

DX 27 3
(American Aviation, Oct. 10, 1955, p. 68 )

f

st)

}

/

i ay? tgp Paes» pee
\ Gas \AJawt iG

© DC-S power prckien puzzler
O Augmented 557 eagine behiz

7 T HAS BECOME an open secret
= ia Santa Monica that Douglas is
confronics with « perplexing DCS

ee nzoiicim. It has been re-evalu-
sting s.! its performance data on the

- projected! Set transpori.

Te will be recaiied that last June
when’ Douglas broke out
$0 draraciically with its
DCs go-ahe aaROUACE-
racnt, i spelled our plans
for two Versions, ‘one a
Comesic mode} kaving a

zoss takeoil weisht of
F100 pounds, the other
&n Overwates mode! to tin
the beam at 257,000
pounds. The company re-

pened it would be ready Hunter deat, has hac his contrac.
airline detiverics in 1959, . Signing founiain pen ali Filled and

Az that time, there was no the cap off, ready to sign ca the
hint of any timetaSie differences be- dotted line for 25 planes. Bur no:
tween the two versions. Now, how- for deliveries 3 year or tore be.

ever, it seems the augmented J57
engine Douglas was counting on for
its long-range, overwates moce! won't
be ready untii a year or more Iscer
than a iess-cug mented J57 suitable
for the domestic version. This would

- the troubles of the exgine-maker, };

iy “hed engine 440. it's = dig sep

—
“ef By Fred S. Huatey
: Pal
oF Douglas.
,
‘

for its overwawz model. Extensive
augmentation like this compound,

adds to the exgine durability pro.
lera, To iusteniv, 39 gulions of fuid
fills the water injection needs of the
Douglas DC-62. A 22-gallon tank
suffices for Couvair's twin.

7" yp to $58
: more.

gailons and
“ i

All this das an, in.
portant bearing on an im.
portant customer — Pas,
Amezican. Word has ,bcea
abou: for some tise: the
Juan Trippe, PAA presi.

hind a dorsestic carries or for cn |
airplane possiiny navisg tess pesloray
ance than & corapetitor. Sinus the pre. |
dicament as Boeing and Bough!
jockey for key customers in the we
markets,

4 | | pur the start of detiveries on on In a similar quandary, inden}
ee j | Svesweres DOS Sack to 1900. Aid tally, fs Cece ts am tee Mado! 16 As,
hee "|| by that time—who knows?—a con sign ior “I WA, which has to bave
is if mercial versio” of P&W's new, asirceait syitable for transatinatic as
ee ae higher-chrust J75 might very well be well as domestic schedules. There are
74 ‘¢: ‘ pushing into the picture, " even hints for. San Diego tna: Con-
‘oo an . No.augmentaiion would be re- vair may decide its Sest course is
aie quired forthe J75. On the orher to bow clear oui, at least for now.
i Ae hand, ic is » heavier engine. A‘co, s @) @
‘os - it will be more expensive. Douglas P&W's J75 is drogsaiicned ind”,
i currently prices the J57-powered Co- both Convair's F-l02 and North?
PaO mestic at $4,600,009, the oves- ican's i072. . . Motorola's
“7 water model at $4,650,000. With 375s, Pens is stcond source on
23 the overwater version's price would new guidarce system for the Navy
‘e have to’ be inczeased abou: $300- Terrier... Designation ior the new
ee 000.. ‘ "Nike is Nike B (nox Nixe 25 du:
eS. ‘ ° F the origina! design is sinsoiy the
Lip = pa gan The J57 9 a ag ceniezs Nike, — 1... Wouter if it
bs . ai Oaly %6 around the necessi extensive i truce nsittute OF ine Act
i mane to another Surns sect of divan. A it water simian oo up the taxe- nautical Sciences actually is consicer-
i Cesesining Burns V.LP. seating far your ait- off thrust if these big jet transports, ing building an office building on
ee Saige ~ ary n rere | like the Bocing 767 and the Dougizs the back lot of its Los Angetes iacil-
om for gatiscal sa . t 1 aislines pot DC, are to be capable of operating ity to lease to aviation Arias and
‘. ae Yer a casio portios of thaXBAA 75 long-range without throwing away allied interests in the area?
: fleas. Wiite, wise or phone today 4.\2 all the payload. Latest resorts iroza e¢
, for ett information, OG Seattle say Boeing is allowing for MecCultoch -Motozs bough: «
ne : ¢ 2 450 gallons of wiwicr for thrust auz- Super 18 Decch from Norexan Laz
ey : Reyes EES Sear nee | meniation for the 767. son, its firs: venture ia an executive
ee i BONY: BB I AR, t Iniormation from Santa Mozicn aircraft . . . Southern Ceilorais
i: t 70 ona doug H indicates Douglas contempisies s° section, with more shan 505 men
: i Peleg” Co Dpetyige? -c fe ‘ s 3 $ 4 + ia ‘
4) 5 ae A f ? somewhat lesser quantity for the co Ser, is the Jargest unik ia whe
ites, UR TP I mes mesic 190-3, hut subsiantivity mwie American Rocker Swiety ..
nage & Circle Me. 26 on Render Services Cord, : ae
om 65 at ks te: AMERICAN AVIATION
. &y : * Ou: ‘ i, 1955
er wf, } , :
4 ‘ Ps .
a tah Dee ae =: ow oe * dst pata an seattinilitinga thin © se \éend extn

(Pages from Ame

DX 28, page 1

AX-1215

rican Aviation, Oct. 24, 1955)

Dr rs

; 78

. _—
PR eres Come ee 10k sceen ewe kw
er. oe » q's oe

'* oom s edad ¥ 4
or mI SY code

Pian WTS |

© Rash ef orders from other

mition dacision.

© First colivery of 707s schoculed

dy WILLIAM Y. HENZEY

“DAN American World Airways
— “broke the ice” this month with a
269-million order ior 45 American.
built jet transport aircraft, all of which
are scheduled for delivery within’ the
next five years, .

As teasion mounted among air.
lines in the race’ to be the first US»
jet purchaser and between manufac.
turers to be the firse US-jet seller,
Pan Am solved both tuces by order.
ing 25 Douglae-buil DC-8s and 20

Voeing 707s
The Ofuct’ Was expected to touch
off 4 rash of orders from other Major
U.S, lines such as United, Anwerican,
Eastera and possibly TWA. Because
of its split nature, it was also seen as
assuring virtual success for both manu-
turers in the

Dowias will start delivering DC-8s to

ec ad Mie) °
9 fe se a ‘ ZR MPA on,

Mune

In December, 1959,

tm!“

. am -_ an
AI\WIS wis yy

. Pan Am, with the order scheduled ior
completion in January, 1961,

The Boving 707s will he powered
by jour Prau & Whitney J57 engin ss,
cox a total of $104 million, includi 1g
spares, and will carry 104 firstchss
passengers and 125 in tourist configura-
tion,

The DC-8s will use more poweriul
P&W J75 engines, cost a tial of $160
raillion including spares, sii; will carry
108 first
SOI eee YM ud

$259-

for Deco.zSer, 1953; DC-&s to start arriving year later.

8 hes., 32 minutes. >

Dorald W. Douglas, president of
Douglas Aircraft, hailed his firm's deal
with Pan Am as “the largest and ios
significant single contract in the history
of commercial aviation . . . opening 4
new chapter in glohul aviation und
bringing the jet age closer tw the lives
of millions throughout the world,”

The Becing-Pan Am contract
“marks ihe beginning of a new era in
aif transportation,” according to Bucing
president Witllium M. Allen, whe
added: “Introduction of the 707 Jet
Stratoiiner on Pan American's routes
will, in effect, make tne work! WY,
smaller,”

*Pan Am's president, Jusn T.
Trippe said the new order plus PAA
orders outstanding, which add up to a
total aircraft commitment of $357 mil-
iion, is “concrete evidence of Pun
American's faith and confidence in the
continued expansion of sound two-way
international trade as well as greatly
increased tourist travel between the US.
and the 74 iriendly foreign nations

Artist's shetch of Bosing 707 in Pam American dress.

3
oo

- MEwed ;

~ — ” 1
é” 4a he :

. 4... -N797007 --
‘ ’ 7 om,
~ deg ge St ee A Siaad
ie tees tepe y ee eee ee ee
_ :
—..

ad

AMEAICAN AVIATION

(Pages from American

DX 28, page 2

Aviation, Oct, 24, 1955)

- -
—_—_—_—aT~ e
- as 4 -
\ ,
eT
7 oo 4
{ /

- MF RITAN
yey

/

ss
—)
i
2

vs

AlR >:
‘a

wget A leo
error rs

WORLS

2

mol te

Do ee ee en

—_—_

Douglas DC-8 as it will leok with Pan American markings.

which are regularly serviced by Pan
American,”

Vice President Richard Nixon, Scc-
— of Commerce Sinclair Weeks,
Air Force Donald A. Quarles,
aad CAB Chairman Ross Ri were
amcng important Federal officials who
hails ihe Pan Am announcement as
a icemendous lift to Aviation aad a
signitic.nt coatribution to the national
cconainy.

But whic Pan Am, backed by a
Douglas statement that the DCS
purcaase is the “first jirm agreement
tor U.s.-duil: jet wansports,” appeared
firs: .. line, many other U.S. carriers
gave cv.dence that litle time advaata;
Wo... .« surrendered to competitors in
the j. we.

~ seremost in poini of time, if not
in size of order, was National Airiines,
which still insists it has the fi
mimment for the Douglas DC-8.
August, testi‘ying uri’c
hearings in the New

company has placed

DC-3s costing about $36 million.
Further, waker said Nations! has

“firm delivery dates” ior four DC-3s

in 1959 and two in 1966. Whether

Pan Am or National was Arst a

National entered with the DC-8 manu- °

United Air Lines was scheduled to
make its rccommendations to its di-
rectors on October 25. The Airlines’
officials held final conferences with
Bocing and Douglas in mid-October.
UAL president W. A. Patterson, J. A.
Herlihy, v.p-engineering and main-
tenance, and W. C. Mentzer, chief
engineer, headed the UAL team in the
final talks.

® Eastern’s board chairman, E. V.
Rickenbacker recently said his company
has allocaicd $i25 million for 20 jet
transports but had not yet made its
mind up as dctween the DC-8 and the
707. A decision is expected at any
time.

American, normally a heavy Douz-
las purchaser and a proud possessor of
many “fArsts” when it comes to new
aircraft types, has not yet made its
mind up and only last week had a
team of engineering experts actively
studying the 707 in Scaitle.

Both American and Eastern, of
course, iously announced so-

mr a = ” id die “s % TP mm $s “ ie “\"a “eo nnatis, “= m~ [rn =~ i “%
meee OS GW Ute faz Pun WODTOS scErice?
© Canscdcir, Bristol and Conveir may join Forces in Precuction of Bristol Super-Sritanaia.

© Britis Zuropean Airways negoticting for fee? of Viscoun: 950s.

rs .
Bosh Tors and DELs
PAA .
~ LES
. Pan Amesican World Airways last
Week signed contwcis totaling $269
ase Re rst major Aiaczican

3

et, or vis 25

Doug:ss } DOA: ond
ice. Tre 707, WigeD ANE
the provoiyze wow diy
Tange of hare thas 3.000 mites nov

eas S Suis tat te DCS
be “ pbc OF KOUSIOD ODStAtions in

either dizection s betwee Now York ang

Vow ann ma te wate ge Mae te “yale
—

Bok wie Gen: jG iv Cibise GD iv
Mach $5, snc che cConimcis guarantee

cruising spoces of 575 mon. at 30, C0

altitude
Psa Ainezican lists these poteniiai
Aight times with the new ict aisiiness:

grounded the
FY-3 Pory yet Sghter
Cation OF its Wrigat } 383
turboie cuzinc to prevent overicating.

U. S. . Navy last. week
North Avzaczicar.

Convsir is Ciscussing = 500 mph.
tuzbonro> sislines with Conadair i an-
othe: Sonczal Dynainies Sivisioa) and

Brssiot Aczopians Co. The Cesizga ior
Celivery fa $956 pronedty, is fe. sect

Narco, sainw: was

; ys 3).
Lbs powered by “he 8 5B: istol B. i a

25 sa as. Condair is bulicing a mitt
sy secon! iSadice version of the Br-
tennis é io RCAY A.

"A new 3nd comolete hytsoster con
$35 we

o a3 aeweathe:
ee Geren’

* Se Ca, ¢ i iwiioa cs
wae Or TD Sosrry bas fist

iottenhd $5008 CsA: : to an-

Vanted Air Ehics Se Heater tease
BUC 2 HOW ROD. POT Die
2G,5cc wid FeVedue oe
Bed G5 3,009 aintenetin,

BEE, TM UNED we. ee Diese

AVR Wicd Suiniee U7, W455

7... a TT & . st Maw
New York to Paris, 6 wee 235 min. New

Yozk to Buexos Aizes, 1 he, 15. min;
Chicago to Londo: =4 hi, 45 mia,
Tokyo to Scaiiic, s' ht, 32 min. and
Honolulu to Sax Francisco, 4 hr. 30
min.

The Bocis.g Fu7s, y wnyercd by sait
& Whitney 137 ox snes, will cariy =
ssengers in sts edi (est —_ ¢

Suration ana i
plane Will dost Fasc n

Dougias’ DCs, with a wing area
approxtastch 7% ieater than the
707, is designed to cane 198 passengers
in standard SCALES arrangements or
131 tourist class passcagers. Pan
Amesican says the DCS will have
“slighty gzcstes Tage sud will
equipped my a larger type Pratt &
Whitt jet turhiae caine,’ the
Ad 75 (cos. wercial designation,

_ ae said that its August an-
nouncement of oe DC-§ periormance
was based on the j-57, but “the Pan
Amiezicen Phaiees covered by the present
eaatsaet are Je “2 to atilize fet en-
Gines OF even grcciee power and ver
satility as and wiser Uicy become avail-
able Commercial use.”

The DCS purctisse calls for cx-
penéitures i ia excess of $160 sniilion for
the 25 aircraft aud sszes.

EWS SIGES

period last year. Freight shipments

were up 35% to 4, 093, 000 ton-miles,
express up 27%6 to 1,276,000 toa-miles
and mail up 6% ‘0 2,007,000 ton-

miles. Late. Bins ig vacationists and
school scturnecs arc credited for thé
trafic increases. .

ic a record 4,320,-
379 ton-inites of aiziccight on domestic
scheduled sevice ii Se: rember, 14%
more than the ssme month last year.
Figure docs wot include the carzicz’s
domestic anc overseas charter flig! ts.
Stick executive “vice
a 30%% Co inescase. in
we this year over 195+
in aizireight for all

fee

HALTS SC

sad 3S ‘ve
aiilines.

ows
dat Ie sure as
tute of the Acza-

ue ao of A: teas ed,
f.

ity auth SI, Tas p sake Ay wee

federal
fe 31.

hones 8GT Dessew Seertddines Coacca Ati

Jet turbine
thrust mechanisms will be insta’:

siencers and reverse

ed.

With the site..cers, Juan T. T,
president oF PAA, says, “The new jets
will make lic more noise oa the
‘ground than present piston-cigined
hanes.” Reverse thrust wi be usec for
ciel Cizect alter lancing.

The’ oer for jet ai
eficct the existing SSS witioa dee
for 33 DC-7Cs with turbdo- “compound
engines. The fizst of these will de, de.
livered in the spring.

_ The combincd commitments, tots}.

expansion of oe two-way interaa-

tional trade as well as greatiy increased
tourist. travel between tic United

tates and the 74 fsiendiy § fore

2.
tions Which are p seguiariy | SeIVES & oY
Pan Amezican Clippers,”
is

Ti pre stated.
NOA-CuMMitial
ed

and pesha:

Paa American
about its long-stan
still existing, ‘orcer dc Haviland
Cowrct 3s. fn f eteterio cy ta Aviatias
Werk, ig Coimpany saie: “PAA io &
continuing interest in the co Haviland
jet piogzam. Certain consceatisl
written understandings exist “detween
the two companics looking toward 3
successful outcoine.”

ane.

if
Net sates tozated $14,941,473 compared
with $17,656,429 for the samc pened
last year. Firm has voted a 25 cents
common dividend payabic Nov. 1 to
holders of record Oct. 15.

*. Prototype . Saab detts fighter, zee

ttedly capable of 1 000-mpa. specs,
is scheduled to Ay soon ct Linsopin ing
Sweden. Developed as a result of fight
studics with the tiny hali-scale $33
Draken, the new ae AE per srg gute:
‘is about 50 it. long and has a span
of approximately 35 ft. Accosing | rn)
" present estimates, orders for the re

il total soine $150 milion and 3
designed to provide the backbone of
the Swedish Air Force in the lste

1950s and carly 1950s.

Bendix Radio settied ts 4. wv oid
sivike last week by giving Co iaiee
- tational Association ef No alas
(Ati ys six coats hansy Taist * th ane
Giese Six CU Bitter tv in
September 1955. ‘The _ Sctiecaent,

which wy Serve as a pate
pat v ; :

ihe Biwi “
paid | hovicay

Beeasgassti A isc

Prise ai

‘

“*

ESTABLISHED JUNE 1, 1937

DX 31 el
(American Aviation, Nov. 7, 1955 pp. 23-25, 27-28)

Ley
Prove it:

-”

DE

MaDe GE

me

‘4
*e

Vox. 19, NO.

.

" t ~_~

33 es . (Bran if,

2 TEE wows XY
_ & Sraasport ae

e _*
’
© Biggest suying’ erive

By ANTHONY. VANSYX

R

turSop-09 Wenszost sctivity

Susthes into the Umelighs

two weeks alter Pan Amerzi-
: “00% ee 0

er ’ - op AY
ete: OPN TE (20 Of oe
WECinGisS, Wer

BRCRTG OF a iS TS GS Les Sigg CS
dsive ia bi % "
sczamdte fez iti

posizions
is hectic. The destinies oF meny airlines

—

wiiters,
More inporsnz than the actual oc.

may well aince on now far up or dowa-
thy .cay be.on Cstivery schecules with,

ders ex.nouneed to date is the osck-stage

soaneuwering B2e Re zodlations now
SCowiag are the |

pee wth the

ee rye

he cctivecy

" eeder the 707 and

ie aed it Se pis

a SBincer of

progzess. Buz the

purchese
Xs st a woral cos: of $175
in Mzy 1959,

4

Easies Newisze! Ai. : an-
a Sra osdes

NOVemssa 7, i
AMA
AVCAT 1A 4!

eit tangile develoncents: Se
© Usted #.ic Line, became the first
US, domessis cersier to order jet trans

oF 30

h 20 option
4 wich an op
shouid is decide vs

-

seuisment ov order mey pass $iebiton mark before your is

oad »
* At least half a dozen US. sad
as many foreiga ai:tines were acgouat-
ing with Bosing, Dougtss and Lock-
heed Zor celivery positions.
United i

¢

SEER

“fi
i

i
|

acd coraioct of che txc, will cssure us
of the proSts necessary to seppost this
iavestmen:.”

RG 4
%

of the cheice of new ecvizment is
Cevelosing into 3 sidieisene far
aicsline mansgenents the world over.
At the Inveractiona! Air ‘Transpor: As-
seciation’s caauc! genes] mecting in

cickering for eight

casticzs targe and smcll were asking
each other for scvice on what to oey
8G when © buy is.
Ssuses Annsszces Frozracm
lz sronths acing ue w
weuay there aac boon

daemon
cmie e

Dov, tas

ates
PRA

el eesinnons
annowarced

*, Ret © see
Kye eras 0 Vail’

ts fnclestry hfs ory Cots under wey.

i

“IO [YA ee
DY LASS

of
Gee

bd

Electra with ths caaouscescat of

i
g
f
£

Electra.

On the tive sice is became close
Get Ge Behih wee au: of the sa
Ring Sm Sas sagas. {us Seles es Sty
ish az éesiésé cgeizat sox
we & Vickers IW isso proccctiosn

Mile the Cocact has loi the oe p3ss:
of all carciccs exesa: BOAC.
se: | Selene | ~ New Yor

A jag opsncd the bizgest news
of all broke: PRA oscered the Bocian;

. 707 and the DCS. A iw cys isiez

ie
aT
ri
ar
eel
tt

&
g

iss terbop-09 Vargucstd whis
and Locatced revecled much

i

ty
5
@ er!

i
RE
tp

$e

Britanais th: Air France had
to buy the SNCASE Caravelic jez

sede shock wo the vast inaiocty of ihe
alsin chicis poocat in New York.
Tae DAA occ: das 28 SOS's acd 23
Seting, 707% coviews!, caught son3-7
ing Furopess carticss at gucci, os oc

2

DC8; Lockheed unveiled its tuzbo- -

:

AX-1219

DX 31, page 2
(American Aviation, Nov. 7, 1955, pp. 23-25, 27-28)

suaeicd 3 cisneve RieZS Im Kor SRowins
* 9 pe ese" SP? SER SSORS the aintine mea cs wea as cid cy

SfERSS PAC? SUA SCORES ‘ . :
| Beit Douglas seprescarciives, wie hove casd:
.

oo

ts. the sace 53 Zz der an esinswd S7Livsr. jet and testepsop trans friends of many 2 26D wacestive in tke '
catket ste three US. monulctunre—Dougiss (DCS), weciheed - rr siemens enh.

R SSS. Se —. ka >. ran course of Going business with them he
‘ : ; we dour dorcizn proceccre—Vissere Arm |yesr ; : af

Reatizi::

¢
.

Nur-der
2

Hatt

rf

is nowhere neacly 6s bigs”
&AVocaies ASSCZT, EVEN on
routes. be

Es.
Hg
¥

é

; specd, S55

SEE SER

' 3s
»
3s
at
- 6 -
- 38
3
20
12
49
3
12,
12
12
_ 3
3
20
we
ebout
- 4 and
te
? .
$10
12
se
b ad
er ow
about
2
abou:
$7
- ebeut
abeut

rf

-

y rs

tt

LEBE Ze
it

a

bf Fei
pepe
ark

‘

‘§

aL S:

Tiga oak -

.

AX

31, page 3 .
(american Aviation, Nov. 7, 1955, pp. 23-25, 27-28)

:
; Ci. 5 eee :
iin Wee eck a ny Ae re
$$ es = Shee age ee Te enna a ee RS Ee |
ae, eee Se Se ee ee aaa >
SS Oe ee ee ae Mg ace hte ot =e
ia foe ee Te ae
f wo modes of j

the sings cusched Gizcctly wo the the V; ward apparently seems inex, | DO% Of two == ove ©
cia, faner shect sete] grid, at the fie: the airersfs wes desi domestic and overwste: version,
teehed te che besic cuselage chin, gives to « Brisish Excopety Aizways’ specifi. | DS® filed with CAA dy Dougiss
elective ica increase and sizes sedvc-° cation which ae wot suit too many OtScial paperwork wes dzuad Oc
Wea wiersver the skin is forewee by other operaiers. Develoamests of the | Wber 18 and sudcaiued wo CAA's

"fives or ocker Esseners. This stress re- origins) Cesig= are cimet, it would Sonics chisl ene so gee
Cuctica where Soles occur minimizes seem, to mike the Veesuard competi- Monica chief engineer 5. FP, 3zr:02.
Stigue erecks iz the skin. tive wich the Elecra.: Taisial tclks on DCS approv:!

HE ecack sheulé occur, or xe skin If indications prove coczect the Van- pe a Rees pow early this month

» Gould de captured by = doreiga objece, posrd verse Evecurs ales tare will ywhea Harold Weshiastsa
the grid woutd wrv: as: scrics of erack & heated exe, for the results of | | CAA Project
grates which . ut prevent er seduce may weli ccenaine whether Brissia i | Visits Santa ; More detafed
tis heck proc sais. Sisciiar iatigue ba fi waclé-wi cosgmezcic! wansnor: | Giscussions with a wam ef CAA
Cieck Pagate: in the wizg is muini- dar Leaps or Wwiscthe: the Vig- cectiSeation perwonnel are expected
milzed by the use of low teasion count was the exception tha: proves the | in December,
a the lower susisce anc integral skis rete. In all cizness, x should be
NOVI 2-2 7, . . . .
AMZhicaw 3
AviaAriw :

a

ov. 7, 1955,: pp. 23-25, 27-28)

Hue
iret

pie pat
uh i ra
;

pig

*ls pooper czre of Gevernzest

S. Eave its pie esd

to uke ia

>
of air

we

Sab!

TEAS 3 is,

yes any. ase

ak HE
Bp ta

bGLS
Ril Fe wiht

sit

5

Rey
ee

e.e .
bi exes oF
weoWelte

He HT
mae :
si il:

He Hii jt de
a

» FE pane
S Ate

4s

a tai
icy sili 4
i Hie tg ,

ors 2

tae

| Sin:

f We

2: tes of Ate Perswts 3
in avw toe incising

Os the powerpiani

spnics Fa 3 epening
to be used.

Tais xpresenis 525
Guisemenss som the = Tecan
gezpsep & 2 Sot arn cost
ois Ss3ss G er Boz. Seconciy, ic wes
the dager

-mameoe cece

po 4 peeviewsty oe reser
is sre as3o: esters we rouie ron 3 to such
Tae a%2f3

ene is, wake and she prOs-

/ ES nctietam peda: sing, cca

IG sadUvitica to

- ese coslat
Seotee 39 ead

sovis wz S Sse

hove es eBags seit
Perse Cecsane Cer ne Sve yeats ence,
Dazite the aise numoer of aizeran
post years, the shoruge of

shie to 2 member ot air.

o3 see present time ib not wishe
indusizy ia

n~-es2 Sessanes sous

she entize
sertizg its rind signs.
The Sigh cait cos of the ici
W2$2S63 S25 eos their number wil theze-
oregon grecter eremenis of
x. Ses

hd

, 4 ~ 2. =:
WE I-TM Anancing

4 Somatic wstzy 5 sos

Singte sitzcne miy de segarcee ia

whe me as 2 ike expenchuze

Zor 3 acick one morms induswis! pant

ta Sec cases, is may be as saticizased thst

Se expences will permit efacicat

tad piSainon Cpremcvnis O jusiiy the

outlay,

Moreover, the fez j Zaas

Ca Bere sod %* heve sec lige ci a

eas: tec Yeats, > Leos age Fazzciag

pins eecercinzy wii be geared to chis

eupeciztion enc dz $233 by cepze-
ciston charges and atendan:
ea geared scceccing y-

egR3

ct may de

sed

lel sanent gree 8 Rot 3 he

SC SieenS atQcisizion ory ins Snancizg.

onsie panes SOS2 More than doub:c

og in cocarcteial service

aie ilso expected 3

2 secs: ies SOs: Less

sendy ‘ eiad's om che lates: pistox-
powered sizerait.

thes: goon,

tees wee”

maj
et aispor equipraeac

is.Vesters,

2 tenon
ae oe

Mes ap
pisce Pererots iS ponent

2°
«vv

Amesicaa’s order ic ss Ereccsa’s en- AX Aviation, Scpx. 12, 1555, P. -, 24).
tailing a capital comsaiment of sony It is probable tha: leag-sezza leszs,
sie vial ¢ cage shorter bank credits anc saoches
$65 mitiion is unikely co create cay
enaia 2! rez, should Convertible preferzed may exser ict
fiasn ing probies.. ~oWe co, $200.0 the fiasaciae here

the company” Cecice to move to jet “gers. Seeapiaars
PRATER te i: Ae It is important to acre her cis

WaRsDozis, ig st msy Want to bulk of the Enanei-! Revirements £..

ERiicipsie through is —

: r the aiziines ozdezing es WL St core

long term m

o

. until four yecrs or so &

2 sation ie Gives thera time to work our 5: arcizg

insOn By the some soken, unc

the aircrai builéess wit
shouides major Tesponsiviicies. Progress
paymenis som their Cus: wees may
ease the builder's sain, dur his at
lay and risk wil be sudscancc!

ane os = |.

icipesi BOF this

Lockheed « scic S30. mittisn in Cesenzcres

earlier this year. Past OF shese proceccs

Was ezimarked for the Sectea prograss.

that Dozsias may sosa

Ban srg FadiKeis to —-

-
pov =

Pruad
“so

aie spacial Seekees

figuze promines:. y

—s

& SS VITOR

ry ow.

wer tt)
meee

Wort
Wore

wet

our ony comps :
Easacing. Paying Jor these
they are deliversc over
period, the company
ediigctions to th:
‘their presiize invoived. On

°
ene > re! -
MAaUGainy lone-: wie

©No“anel has

sss
tow

* AMERICAN AVAT:

ULASCES

ene “ =
5 i% “°retss¥>es ia ook” y*s . :
A . . 14) ® . “, {mw
c Y DX 40, page 1 - SOAS c
DK (TWA Board Minutes-June 21, 1962) AS
a , MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING

TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC.

a
June 21, 1961 ;

. The regular meeting of the Board of Directors of Trans World
* Airlines, Inc., was held on Wednesday, June 21, 1961 at 9:30 a.m., at
the offices of the Corporation, 380 Madison Avenue, New York, New York,

Directors present were: Messrs. Ernest R. Breech
- > ; George R. ‘Brown
' EB, O, Cocke
F. D, Hall
Clifford F, Hood
Barry T. Leithead
Albert V. Leslie -
‘Sidney Maestre
Hughston M. McBain
Warren Lee Pierson
Ben-Fleming Sessel
Thomas A. Slack
Charles C. Tillinghast, Jr.

' Constituting a quorum.

Directors absent were: Messrs. Raymond M, Holliday
John A. McCone
Mr. Carl S, Rowe, of Counsel, was present by invitation,
Mr. Ernest R. Breech, Chairman, call the meeting to order
and thereafter presided. ;

Mr. Ronald Duckworth, Secretary, acted as secretary of the meeting.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

The minutes of the Beard of Directors meeting of May 17, 1961 Y)
and of the Executive Committee meetings of May 18, 19, 24 (two), 25
and 31, 1961 were approved. _ . a

.

i, Gt -. XT20130F

AX-1225

f ~* f= "%4-eting 6/21/6i
DX 40, page >
(TWA Board Minutes-June 21, 1JEl) er v, _.
_ FINANCIAL REVIEW ee ee

‘Mr. Albert V. Leelie, Senior Vice President - Finance and
Treasurer, presented the June financial review including an analysie ar2
forecast of the market position of the Corporation for 1961.

Mr. Leslie also reported on the sale of Debentures in the amoun:
of $100, 000, 000 during June and advised that a total of $19, 037,900 heii
been subscribed for by sharcholders Senerally and $80, 962, 100 werc .
purchased by the Hughes Tool Company at the closing on June 13, 196).

Mr. Leslie advised that negotiations with respect to the 196)
financing were proceeding in accordance with the plan outlined to the May
meeting of the Board; that the ‘Prudential Insurance Company of America
will not be included as a lender; that the total of $147 million to be _
‘borrowed will be provided by the lending banks to a total of $40 million
and $53.5 million each will be made available by The Equitable Life
Assurance Society and the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and tha:
the closing of the financing was planned for the third week of July.

He advised that the contract progress: pa:-ment of approximately
$13 million due to Boeing Airplane Company on the additional jet aircreft
had been postponed from July first to August 1, 1961, subject to th
payment to Boeing of five per cent interest on such amount, _

OPERATIONS REVIEW

Mr. E. O. Cocke, Senior Vice President and System General Manager,
reported on system operations and described the steps being taken to |
improve passenger sales including introduction .of Royal Ambassador i
Service in the International Division and increased advertising in both |
divisions. There was a lengthy discussion of the extreme competition on
North Atlantic routes, He reported that since the inauguration of Conveir |
880 aircraft schedules in the New York/Chicago market, the TWA share
of the market had increased from eleven per cent to twenty per cent.
Mr. ' Cocke also advised that an intensive sales campaign was under way
in all major TWA markets.

RELATIONS WITH HUGHES TOOL COMPANY {2
(

Mr. Tillinghast stated that following the meeting of the Executive
Committee on May 31, 1961, at which it had been decided that no adequate
reasons had been shown to justify a change in the Corporation's Boeing
purchase program, a meeting was held with representatives of Hughes
Tool Company to permit Hughes Tool Company to present to the Corporation
technical information asserted to be available to Hughes Tool Company

“

°

XT 201306

AX-1226 :
RECE DX 4o, page 3CtSCetng 6/21/61

(TWA Board Minutes-June 21, 1961) -. -,_ ;

SO ee aed

relating to the question of whether or not the Corporation’ should acquizc
four additional Convair 880 jet aircraft and thirteen Convair 990 jet aircraft
rather than the Boeing aircraft presently on order by the Corporation... He
stated that such a Meeting was held on June 2, 1961, and that Mr. Chester
Davis, counsel for Hughes Tool Company, made a presentation on this
subject to the’ Flight Equipment Committee and others, as the directors had
previously been advised that no one with a technical background had assisted
Mr. Davis at the meeting, that little of technical significance wan developed
at the meeting, and that the transcript of ouch meeting was available to any
director, He further stated that oubsequently, Mr. Rummel, who was
present at the meeting, analysed the various points raised by Mr. Davis
and submitted a report on the subject. This report was considered by
members of the Flight Eyuipment Committee on June 8 and 9, 1961, and
by the Management Policy Committee on June 13, 1961, The members of

- both Committees concurred in Mr, Rummel's conclusion that nothing of

| importance had been presented by Hughes Tool Company that had not
previously been considered by the Flight Equipment Committee and that
thé previous recommendation that the Corporation should acquire Boeing
tather than additional Convair 880 and Convair 990 aircraft should be
confirmed.

Mr. Tillinghast then referred to the letter dated June 10, 1961 from
Mr. Raymond Holliday to the Corporation'and others, to which was attached
a letter dated June 9, 1961 from Mr. Holliday to the Corporation. He
stated that a copy of both of these letters had previously been forwarded to
each director. He further stated that he had received that morning a
. telegram from Mr. Chester Davis’ advising that the ten-day period within
which the three proposals contained in the letter of June 10, 1961 could be
. accepted by TWA was extended to June 22, 1961.

Mr. Tillinghast also referred to a letter dated June 16, 1961, which
he had sent to Mr. Raymond Holliday commenting on the three proposals
contained in the letter of June 10, 1961, and requesting certain additional
. supplemental information relating to such proposals. He stated that a
copy, of this letter had also been sent to each director.

Mr. Tillinghast pointed out that in connection with proposal number
one of the letter of June 10, 1961, relating to a proposed increase in the
equity capital of the Corporation, an extremely important fact was the effect
that the acceptance of such proposal, including the condition that the present.

' Voting Trust be terminated, would have on the ability of the Corporation to
. obtain additional needed financing, particularly additional debt financing. He
eaid that he had asked Mr. Albert V. Leslie, Senior Vice President -
Finance and Treasurer, whether or not the Corporation could arrange
additional needed debt financing if the Voting Trust were terminated ao
proposed in the letter of June 10, 1961, and that Mr. Leslie had reported
that in his opinion this would not be possible under the circumstances.
Mr. Tillinghast also stated that letterc had been addressed to the finarcizl
institutions presently holding the Corporation's outstanding notes asking
whether they would be willing to terminate the Voting Truct on the condition:

outlined in the letter of June 10, 1961, and whether, if the Voting Trust were

X1201307

“ [eo ee a oe ~ e-* SPR fetes ° - “ay
tzect. Catach ¢) « -ys vet. aires alt seeing ; wad ‘ te tee
g : .

..*
: : Pron eds Nee cies --* |
~ of .

this. be expodiies. -f mentioned it fad teken-c iittte

| longer than I thought, and it eure did. So his directive

or result of the conversation was that I should continue

te towk with Uetawe sad pete on.

- 4 e-+. 2 a “ :
, - © Bee oes. OO Sot wwee bape ies ev Ce ay aeons

.
-_

Huchos eid o- eratd ha ASA eMd Toney pee be ne ae
to Sir Goosge Edwarzus himself, aad I don't know whether this
was as a result of Sir George calling hin or Mr. Hughes

calling Sir George. I don't recall now.

IT think another condition, if I can reve Co thet,

was that the spoei fications be stisfacto:y to Tia,
Q To which? , \
A To TWA,

—_—=

WR. WILLIAMS: That the Specifications be satis-~
factory to TWA,

A This had been our intent, Hughes’ and I. This had
COMMERCE REPORTING CO.

ee ee ee

: "DX 43, page 395.
-~—--i (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W.

Rummel.
been the understanding and intent in that respect,

At some point Hughes committed to Sir George Edw divans
for the procurement of these 15 airplanes, and Vickers had
begun to prepare for the installation of some of the change
and modifications that we had required as a result of our |
specification’ negotiation. I don't have the impression at
the moment that they had gone too fax in the acttal incite!

Jatfon in aixerafz, but I can't be cevtain now just hes 2-

rey oer! £0. 34 ete ee le Si aaa ea

‘As I recall it now, and I have to rn you this ns

_ My best recollection, Vickers met the 20 per cent criteris, ,

cuey mec the specitications criteria substantially--no one |
ever bats a hundred per cent, but we felt the specs were

wud thoy Gd mauac, as I ncuctoncd eax Licx,
the payload range aspects,

It was very, very late in this negotiation that it

“was discovered that th: man in Vickers with whom we were

dealing thought that he had an agreement on the airplane |
price when he in fact did not.
As a result of this, we undertook & price negotia-

tion which became tedious and Somewhat prolonged, It

included discassions with a nucber of Vickers people who

came over for the purpose, and included such things as

escalation or let's Say the establishnont of the

, "DX 43, page 396
eommemmmenws * (Exeerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)"

Rurcl 396

"reasonableness of asking price compared to what they had
obtained or contracted for with other airlines, but consider:

4; ing things like labor inflation, parts cost rise and the

5 like. during the intervening ala It rcally became

involved,

a We were unable to come to agreement on price be- . |
5 cause we oe: Benen Tey "os" I woaa I gud the people tin: | |
9 , Were helpins: ro--I +t-as5 waable to Ct Vaciicrs to 726 0:
1W4-: to meet the objectives: in price that i undowstood chat is,
Hill Hughes desired, _ |
ta, This finally got to tho point whore Vielkces said
a NLOOK, you luxe us un Oiter, We don't care what it is,

Ls Yoke any offer, We might take it,"

5 were 28 tg oe sebes LeSBees. Cevece uid nuc
6 _Swer, but referred mo to Mr, Leslie,

. Mr. Leslie advised that I had no authority to alee
aa any offer of any sort, that in fact no offcr could be madc,
e. This was the first I hed heard of this, '

4 | PR. LARR3 Could I have that last?

‘| THE WITNESS: This was the first I had heard of
kf this turn of events,
if oe I.was in Now York in the next few days and discussed
a i it personally with both Mr. Burgess and Mr. Leslie, and

i thoy had the view that there wasn't, as I understood it

a tt (Excerpts from Deposition. of ‘Robert W. E

}. Sir George, that he would not change that commitment, t

"DX 43,

ae
a

397
that there wasn't any deal that could be made that Twa

Rucrel

could enter into. However, unfortunately, bythe time al]
this occurred, Mr. Hughes had already committed to Sir |
George Edwards to take at least 15 airplanes, a ee

Vickers representatives were also in New York at
the time, and told me that, look, they could understand
that there might be problems. I mipht interject this, to
seis that TWA, in this particula: Porica’, bed suftored a
Sownturn in business, and this efiected our ability -to
proceed. It wasn't a whimsical thing at all, I am sure,
And that, referring to the Vickers representatives commen
now, if there was anything that we derircd, z di £foront
interest rate, maybe different terms, a different percent:
of financing, just to say so. Thoy vaeante ern thew enw
do it, but they would be happy to try.

I reported this to Mr. Burgess and Mr. Leslie, an
it was clear that we would be unable to proceed,

This was roportod to

a

Peers Pe a +f Sete en
Se BUGKSS, WhO Sccausd rathc

upset to be so advised, although I had indicated cariicr

| te appeared TWA was cooling off some. I discerned nothing

as definitive as I have described, but a sort of lack of

enthusiasm let's say. | / ;
Me. Hughes, I recall, said that. he had committed

ie

late

14) didn't build them for us, because by the ting it was detcr-

16.
17

| Ahow thot he had £r1£1116g all his cdi:

| things.were now-on Fe}
y th ; :

0.0674
DX 43, page 398
Lawes sree neee (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Ruy

—
e
ee

Rummel - 400
confident that I might not have backed off from a reques|
for two or three and backed off to one, That is quite |
possible, _ | 4

Q I understand. My question now is whether or J
in fact one was received, |
A To my best knowledge, none were received by anyo

Q Bo you recall what the purpose was or tie rettc

Sox muting a request for oae or wich cane down to ov!
i a ‘ora quite certain, I can't be positive, but °F
am quite certain that Nee ; Rushes enseeneed the pres | |
thet he wanted the one airplane for some sort of flich: | 1
test purposes, It was definitely an airplane for kx, & ,
Hughes and not for TWA, as far as I ever knew. iF
Q identity : it, chon, by the perdod, ‘by 24>

time period?

A Well, let me say I have the impression now thet

had 4A moved rorward with Hughes in the first instance

we would have far and away been the first to have Viscount

aun 2 c- %. =? >

or; ie wre eyes ai on we an . G . at ae ce Sane eee .
Pte te a we ee wee aww VERE, dome desk win anol, Qu eid emer,

J. S. airlines to express interest in the Viscount,

Q I gather gro your testimony that there was a
model or type of Viscoutit being offered by Vickers which
you Yelt was not Suitable or cosirable from -_s point of
view, and that at some later period, ard that is what I

am trying to identify, one period against the other,

Rummel
The 630 was a prototype, the first Viecount produced,
It was the only such airplane produced. The airplane
was reeensinccred, the fusilage was lengthened, the fuel
capacity changed somewhat, pee I recall, and other changes
made. Then it was placed in that subsequent configura-
tion in production, That became the first production
Vasrorit, the first srovp of which vont to Pea,

-%

fran that time on Viscount semaincsd in rroduct:c

'* @s‘eSscntially the ‘game besic airplane. There were —

an, however, introduced at various: times sieve the

production line, The engine was uprated in power,

~31

git, eS eee PN ee he +e - i te mt - ie a @u - at, *
ee Oencca Cow tS wSLe auc e — Ciuske & SVG he ec wae Sianos ewes

whether there wes a still longer fusilage version or not,
Thaes mtate hawa hao, Ceontinenent mithe bon ene~n-
@ longer fusilage, for example.

So there was no splitting of the line or two
distinctly dissimilar models. It was an evolution of

the first tp: thet wes then produced in serics, so to
Speax, in this one production line. I hate to take the
time to elaborate on all these points, but in the interes!
of accuracy, when I say one production line, a am speak-
ing figuratively, because the airplane vas produced on |

THE SPECIAL MASTER | Mr. Davis, . on bee

»> ‘ ’ . sane
ta a es sa stn ain (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Ru

—

vv

Cw fs

were of lesser interest than some of the others. .

Q Do you recall during what period of time it was
that Handley Page was in the merket of making offerings
to United States airlines?

A I don't really know the extent to which they dealt
with other airlines. I would only assume that since
they were talking mages they were talking to other air-
lines. ek

Q I am trying to identify the period as well as you
can do it, and always subject to correction, Mr. Rummel.

A Well, I can't be sure, but I think it falls in the
period, oh, possibly 1956 or '57 on. I am not certain of
that date, Mr. Davis,

Q During the jet age period? ;

A Essentially during the jet age, maybe with minor
overtures just before that. ie ‘

Q The next one that you identified was Bristol of
England, Will you give us the same information with
respect to that manufacturer of eircraft that you have
with respect to the others? | |

A The first work with Bristol, as I recall it,

predated the Anglo-American conference at Brighton that I. |

mentioned a few days ago. I can't recall the exact
time now, but Bristol put forward information which was

|

}.

"a
Sn al dal

a ' "DX 43, page 444
ees oe (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)"

| 4 eee Rumme 1 hbk
- descriptive of the Britannia in an interest to--in an

3 || effort to interest us in it, |

4 I visited the Bristol factory I believe twice

5 |/on trips to England, and inspected the Britannias that

6 || were in production, and I think was kept generally apprised
7 || of the progress that Bristol was making in developing

8 |iand scliizs the aixzplane,

} @,-2 2 © - A -
2 the cirplene was oxdexcd by LO‘C cnd a nerher of.

"10 | othe airlines, and I believe uzs also ozcered, and I don't

recall if this was initially or later on, by British

=
12 || military services as a transport.

ie; et. | o. eo 9 nm ~ D woe 0. Poe 00a g, — os owe” ?
13 Qua Gaspicsis wos & lusge Zouseeagiae tuchbsocop

14) that I believe I described heretofore.

1S Q Wteing tftenetf2ed 2" 2 a lenes teebeceep, paghere
16 || at this point it might be helpful if you would identify

17 || the other type of aircrart that might be considered as

18|' competitive with the Britannia, or with which the Britannia

, Was coupeting for whatever rozket.

20-5 A When the iciceanne was first discussed, Bristol

21 anticipated delivering it much sooner than they finally

i 22 || did, and at that time, had it been produced en Bristol
3 expected, it would have been competitive to contemporary
U. S. piston airplanes, and later on with the Electra,

wap

and still later on with the jets,

"DX 43, page 445 Ry .
- (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert We

It in fact wasn't produced when Bristol first
thought it would be, so the competition that it found
itself up against varied through the years.

Q The only.ather U. S, manufacturer of a pA AS xe
was the Lockheed Electra, is that correct?
A Of a large tutkoprop, yes.

Q The cne that would be comretitive with the

ae i Pritanaia, the Visesunt, or==
‘eo

a tio 4.

: ‘ht The Electra could have competed on some segments, but:

“42 i
43 ’ Q You say that the original plans of Bristol, if

: 14 | they had been able to deliver as coon as they originally

not on the extrémely long-range serments,.

15: | anticipated, the aircraft would have competed with the

17 || would it . been coupeting with?

18 | A The late Constellation series and the DC-7 series,

19 It in fact did compete in international service with these

6
|

20 " airplanes. Again, the DC-7s and Connies were still in
21 service when the Britannia finally appeared.

Q When I refer to the competition between types of
23 | aircraft I an--perhaps I should learn to uae a different
24] expression, Mr. Sopa —=t am trying to determine the om

; | | 25 | types of aircraft pitch were available to girlines for

22

Rummel “at

ly, S. picton engine. Which U. S. piston engine aircraft |

.A The Britannia had mich more renge. than the Electra, . i

, " "DX 43, page 446 ss ’
(Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)"
:

a

Rummel | 446

a Ee cicaennt for the pur pose of determining to what extent

3 A airlines had a choice between procuring Britannias or

4) | Electras or Viscounts or Vanguards or whatever other types

si of adrorafe, jets or piston engines, so far as that goes,
sf for the purpose of determining what competition Bristol

> ves facing as a manufacturer and would-be seller of air-

craft, what king of competition it was facing fxcm other

8 ji
0 ménufacturers of aivernte,
ig ja wca® Have. I mace myself clear to ycu?.. |
7 * | | & In‘addition to those I have mentioned, I believe |

12 || the Comet would have been construed by Bristol as being a

i3 compotltss.

14 || Q For clarity, would you mind now identifying,

| {

15. Listing for re, ea Teen weitaenesnd, the varies tynes of
li
16 i aircraft which were in competition with the bristol Britan-

17 nia in the sense that I have just tried to explain to you?

18 | - A Well, this would be my personal opinion, but as I |
A9 : understood, you are asking what Bristol confidered their | |
20! competition to be at that timc.

Q That's right, but from your point of view, as a
2, Person interested in choosing or deciding which tye of
ee “aircraft to procure for the benefit or -use of TWA, I am
‘ |} taterceted in your —- and judgment as to which air-

-- (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert Ww.
ae -

your giving me also, ix you cure io w so, your understand.

ing as. to what Bristol might have considered its competitia,

but I would appreciate it if you could do it separately,
A I will try, Mc. Davis. As I recall it, ny

distinct evaluation of Bristol at the time was that they

| could not reasonebly be expected to produce the Britannia

| wea they said they--waen they tore plcuning to procuce it,
i tered person: ily to paca Ue Giipians in & bssekct

“10 ‘ of time somewhat Luter then, Belstol did,

' Even so, in the beginning the Britannia would

compete or did compete on the maxzket with the later serics

of Ceoretalictions, the Me7 and the Corst,

Later on tle Britannia, once it was in production
end fully eestificcted, and in service, it competed with
jots fzom tue standpoint of prouuscusuc, ct lsest, Bristol

made an effort in this direction.

As I recall it, Bristol claimed there was always
2 pisce for the Britennia, and that there was a place for
jets as well, but obviously, to the extent that Britannias
would be procured, it would, to some cxtent, displace the |
jet markct. | |
It also competed, in this period, in this country,
certainly, with the Lockheed Electra, but not in overseas

service, because the Electra was not that kind of an air
' plane.

. * "DX 43, page 448 "
===" (Byeserppts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)

Rummel 448
_ Q Perhaps I can approach what I am driving at a little
; differently, Mr. Rummel,

I uncerstend your testimoay to be that Sristol
approzched TWA or approached you some time before this con-

ference at brighton. You don't know the exact date,

ih a Can you give me any idea of the year which you

, b'think thet wes7

is) A Well, it cfche beve bean ecovad 1952, but T ra not
: .
oveereatin, ee Se ee ee

ae Arourid 1952, ALL right.

ial Apparently you gave some thought, mede some
LFF ntes- 22 - ‘Ogite hick teu ee oe 50 24, of Oe nt ee ee
poweseccy SN Re er at te e aya gaan: Be hed wee am &iin anaes oe te we Ouc[.,

| :
ithe Britennia, the possible use of that product by THA, ts

15

that win%9

16 A Yes, sir, |

J !
i Q At the time that you were giving that consideration |
18 ito this prodwt what other aircraft from other manufactur - |

9 ers wore also avallable to you of tice being offered to tt.

Lie -

0 domestic aizline industry which warranted conside:aétion

7
1}as an alternative to the britannia? see describe or
7 {tentity that situation for me? a:

) a Well, I may have micunderstood, Mr. Davis. I thougtt

#ithat's what I did, :

me Q Y think you did too, but in your answer I was getting

= vA. 53, page 44) :
a (Bxcerpts from Deposition of Robert wW.

2¢ 1: Rummel

| 4a9
a little confused when you began to describe the fact that

3 ithe aircraft was competing on the routes with another air.

craft. It may be that the answer is still the same.

Let me put it this way: At that time, assuming

eee ee
-
21 |!

| lation or the DC-7 series.

ay | Nonetheless, the britannia was given considera-

oD
: tion, not only by TWA, but there were numbers o£ conversa-

_} tions with Mr. Hughes during which the airplane was des-

|| €eibed, performance aspects were discussed, power plant

“VR S53, page 4 —_
(Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. |

ot adie LS ee

| ;
Gc " | Rummel 45a
2

configuration was discussed, and that ‘sort of thing,

3 @ With itr. Hughes?

4 A Yes, between Mr. Hughes and myself, but I recall

eo: Bee ue

} 5 ; this, that there were a series of conversations. I couldn't ;
6 |
Giese: to pinpoint the date, or precisely what was said in

7 each one of them, but I do recall discussing the Britannia;

ii et
8 e Q Cen you give me an idea of the period of time during |
7

4
: 9 sWhich it woudd be faix to aay thet Ti or you were givin’
i. : x

em ra il.

‘14 i other supnort activitics,.

15!

Tsetse AF glean poms agnedeteerd. Inateding potas

16 _ Gyaizpizcs Sut Lluccraacional ccevice, bue wnat I ca saying

17 ig that -i¢ sort of finally boiled down, as I recall it, -

18 I to the most serious interest finally being in a linited nume :
19 ber of aizpicues in this domicile scrvica. |

20 2 Bristol wss quite ciliaiih to ake a dsal, to th
1 point where it was quite willing to re-arrange delivery

4 schedules to the extent that it could in order to accommo-
Bl date Mr. Hughes and TMA.

i” During th: period I think that I was negotiat-

ze: ‘with Bristol on behalf of Mr. Hughes, bebdet Meets Se

ir RS NS jot nahotalgiioneisonsiie niaenien from Deposition of Robert W.

~_

OO A GAO + ety wc tty

ulemlUWw®

7

s-

>

“ae

16 |

17 :

18 |

ais

20 |

21

22

"DX 43, page 455

"
fat:

Rummel ‘ | } 455 \
clearly uncezstood whether the airplanes would ‘finally be Evtetel, .

g-?. ©

c mugetasation we. esveicd te the point of -

10 Leelinthiy “y vvLew of epecif: teations, Bristol--the t-nder a HO

il he Bristol of lettere offérine the strotels: : | ‘.

e 5 X made a trip to Montreal et , Hughes’ requcst
:

3

60 inspect a beiccunia waich was ae imaweal at rire ciuwe,

eke -, ~ .9% eS . we, es ow 2 *. os -? = 5 - 2%
Seee Pe ed - ~** ~

. ee 2 en Oe
~~ + « See nee Peete « pet, ~~

—

I did meet with men from Bristol. They indts |
ie loated the airplane was availeble for Mr. Hughes to fly,

aud had been cvaileble for a numbcr of G2ys or weeks for
’

20" that purposes,
i
me _\\ 2 looked the airplane over ‘and «iscussed a num’

| !
a qr features with the ‘eal sta Bristol ae |

| |
opene the airplane up for that purpose, )
: oo | By, opening | up, I mean opening inspection,
he cowling and the like, things they could do without

1 Rummel 457 aor

2 dt emant Ling the airplane.

3 | This airplane was ‘also examined dur ing flight

ti

4; tests for siz purity. In fact, we did it on the Britannia
f

5 before we, as I recall it, did this relative to the Vis-

6 ‘count that I montioned earlier that TCA had-mada
7 |\evaileble.
18 ‘ Aivy scmples wore tekon fren verfous places
9 ‘ia tre cabsn ead factie coekpit. I diteveccd the “ase

“ a
'

eas owith hire Hughes in-ecome detail beford it was undertaken,

a1 Ite was quite particular on how he wanted some parts of the

pie \ test run. The test, in the first place, was done at his

ate a 2
jae See eee Gas 2 eccictccoce Ses Ie tt a good thls te do.

salt ~~. awe ~_
* he

‘14 4 was frankly concerned with this part of it.

I

Sad Tha “not weentee, anna they esra made avas]ahto
16 | by ths. laboratory that assisted, were reviewed in some dc-
17 ; cail with he. Hughes,

18 Now, & torollary-scorollary effort: to: thésé

1D tests was to) check into some of technical aspects of ree
20 latcd items.

21 f For example, at what’ temperature does the or
22 | — the fumes from various kinds of oil become toxic,
23 (Af of all, eb apaihy 4 bel

iH | |

24 | a ‘tac ane petrolium based lubricants ae
s. 2

25 las wot as os mal being sonevhat di

COMMERCE REPORTING CO.

"DX 43, page 458

wees

Ee halo esiat Nov a great deal of information appeared to
; be available, particularly with respect to synthetics,

, that is, synthetic lubricants,

5 : This part of it was done by my power plant
6 specialist operating out of Xansas City, who then maie

7 this information available to me for review and for pur-

noses of ciscussing “hts stant with tho fltiche tears:

o iG -c-
¢ “WLS With Me. Evchos.
« Jorvt - * + The net results of these particular tesi:r waa

: 11 hat we found no evidence of toxicity in the airplane,

12 oF suy danger from toxicity.
|

. Bhat Cena ox wemcon wh i wis cee Ge ee eee
fl

1! plece for a-~ecess.

:* ! (Wharounan , molest Amer tees tenleary\

“

17

1? :

ae (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)"

hae ee el (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert w,

1 Rummel | woo
2 ; MR, DAVIS: Will you read to the witness the

3! last portion of his qaever to refresh his recollection
4 as to where he was in his narrative?

5 | (The answer was read.)

ty | WR, WILLIAMS: Had you finished the answer, or

7 h do you want to add to it? |

c A I vould like to add this, th a5, ty way of explana-

* ‘hoa, tha scrsoa the taste were undertckcn in the Dratanc::

» 10 was. becuuse in this porticular ajrpisne the eir. that wae

11 [pumped into the cabin and the gockpit for breathing during

12 prescurized operations all flowed through the power plants
13 ““hemsalyvos, where heretofore, senerally, airplanes had the
i

14 ‘air that was breathed pumped in by separate pumps or super-

15 — dissssociated, except for the power drive, from
15 ‘tae ‘ebaines:

17 The question was wrether or not the air passing

16 [eorough the engine could somehow become toxic, and this was
19 the reason why it was felt appropriate to conduct the tests.
20 , The Viscount was a different ‘installation from the
2) ‘pritannia, but nonetheless we thought it appropriate in

22 |ithat, case too. : . : oe
23) le Have you now fately describes the nature or BCope
|

| 24 of the investigation that was wails wy TWA relating to the

25 ow of procuring Britannias? | |

"DX 43, page 460 snes
(Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)" -

Rummel 4590

A No, I can elaborate somewhat.

3 While I was at iontreal ir. Hughes requested that

4' I contact Cartcr Burezes and invite “ur. Burgess and a nun-

5 ber of his imnediate staff to Montreal to fly in the

6 Britannia.

7 |i My understanding of this exercise was that this
|;

t

would chive hit, teresa and his siyif ean ores “amine to

9 Leemanace tiie Truiug Gualities of the airplaic and perhaps

i.
He sweteh that: perancetive better visualize the kind ef service

(a lena we were discussing, : : a |

A2 |! I contacted iir. Burgess, and he and a number of

3 ) Pep bo2560 £25.50 vs OR ka the: 2 en POe sy wan se hay
"

aCe

‘were met by myself and a Pristol representative, taken to
15 | . : . 3
tha Pose cogent ny cart Maney S Parsg fn ed : boas 5d eA Boi bes :

iO flicht, és { recall it. I think ut was possibly an hour

=“ an Veco Sa -

17

iand a half, or thereabouts.
18 |

On landing we returned to the airport, flew back ¥

: .
as — 2

! ‘ .
17 || dirplean: Staletly fzom TWA's point of view, vic looked at
!

it in terns of its--in terms of what it vould probably

19. do for others, and then what that would do to us.

. Ul
20 4.5 Z wentioned earliez, part of the Oujcccave ot
21 tae regotic sion with Beistei 1003 to L272 2 way to proeccd ™

\ \

without requiring much cash, be ly

As I recall it, although I do not recall the

| | | ||
particularity, part of the reason Bristol had for mil

!

ED | ‘or | al |
5}} tacting the government! was to make funds available fo ,

/

Or TT stele . H > e a. ° eve

sO aa BAS fT mir

1 Thoce were predvetion problems in relationship to avail-

i!
| A Well, at one time part of the aisplancs that

‘ reicoeak Trae eats VEY ehout | rea iebsig ay ailable to Bes

| and the excct degzee to waicn tinls wry have gotce:. unto

(Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W.

ay

: 469
would like to have some tangible evidence of interest,

Rummel

eithcr a personal appearance, a letter, or something, and
to my best recollection, it got no such tangible evidence, 2

Q You referred to production problems at Bristol,

able financing?

ay sane ates 12:09 oF oraz ‘by Seotnich Clan. Wat i

+L enn'’s be coxtaln tt this time, I think Bristol felt che

need for mending fences, if you Like, ahead of tins, with
respect. to releasing airplenes for this purpose.
I am sure they had discussions with Scottish Clan,

discussions at a goyernment level, I can't be certain

now, but I have the impression that it probably did,
= Can you identify the Scottish Clan to which you were
referring? |
A Not except that it was an interest that had
ordered a faizly small number of Britannias. 3 i»
Q Were the financial resources of TWA at that tine

+

a factor in the decision or conclusion which was reached?

A Well, ‘this would have been primarily a question ~~ |
me ’

@ mae

oe "px 43, page 469A —
_ (Bxoarpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rumme})"

ye Rummel . 469A
| poine of view. This would bee question Ir. Leslie

would have, I suppose, been expected to take a position

on with lr. Bytpeee |

.. I have never knowna case yet, when ordering equip-

\ -
. --

ment, when finances weren't an important considoration.

te

fae tho evatiec bAlicy oF ftuonelugs to T!. frou rhntove:

a. Ca ek cet tlon of Robert Ww,
1
Tummel ——
3 = What I am trying to determine is wh2ther or not, ‘\
4 | to your hocliiadve: the Scnencial resourses svaileble to_
5 . Ti" et thet time were a major factor or consideration which:
6 ae cs seucsed at this meeting attended by M. Burgess,
ro tac anotte, yourself, and others,
¢ | f& Well, I ean't encwer it, Is. Davis, because I
eats not phat Was mods available or wh.t would be mde
doa? Yestew le e2cher Paoug Le Be treough Hughes to Tit OL

¥i “bemgeecetc fais is an area that I didn't directly work with,
; «. What I am tryirg to establish is wnsther or not

i
'
!
i

13 this decision which wes made at this mootin:; which you hove

a
14 | previously identi fiod, whether it is your undozstanding
s| that the decision was predicated upon fectors other than

€-.9°9°Om y
or id Spee Sag

17 | & Well, I am quite certain thet thore were factors

ae considered besides financing.

if * « Iunderstend thet. I am trying to datermine to
20 unet extent availeble financing or the willingness of the
21 Tool Cowpany to provide the financing or to cornmit its
22 | credit was a subject of discussion ct this moeting or meet-
23 ings at which the decision that you have described wes

24 | acde.
25

4 I don't recall snacifically.

\ I am intcrestab Sigtatyie bl Gea tha ae Re > no =

—:
Rummel 471
live. Rummel,
You testified at one time that Bristol original-

ily anticizcted a delivery schedule which ou felt they

paght not be able to keen,

Can you dascribe what the facts wore in that

pears, whet was it thet Bristol originally sr.ticipated

'being able ¢

to do, end whet in *

ou 293 pee = 7 = ~ Ro. act es
t secall the sencdules nov, Be. Gavic

4 tad vm . . * - -
“ch she Rristol fsstesy, huvars

a possonsl evalucticn, if
ths, that cs a result of whet I saw, and as a 1csult of
_ ithe discussions I then had with them, they could rot
rs i
" [reasonably be expected to meet the delivery schedule that
_ they Weve wiikang about ang paciming om. sd oy Noelivesy
AG
ischedule, " I am speaking now of the production of airplanes

18 ‘to their custorers,

19: Q That is what I am talking about.

20 | . 4 Later on the delivery prospects were, again upset

21 | .becnuse the Britannia caught, so to Speak, some cackwash

2 i: the Comet program. /.s a result of the investigations

het followed the Comet disasters, the British Government,

ecting, to a fair degree, I believe, in consert with
jindustry, laid down some criteria which required extensive

peevaluation and retesting of not only the Comet, but

an
- (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)"

Aemaremets asase «

peste exseneha See "Dx 43, page 472 a
| | (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rum
{
|

Rucmel 4

H1so the Britannia, Now, this in turn caused additional
delay in producing Britannias.

: Q Can you identify or describe the nature of that
¢ deleys was it a delay of months, a year? |

2 ; A Well, I can certainly give you my recollection. I

a vould be hard put to prove it at the moment. But I would

go Sszens heve the icpression that the MTeitannin vas éclayod
“

—

x 10‘ 0 Aneeenones year or ESreaney 8 year end c (uartcr, oF
ae 4 ‘sheroabouts, as a result of the additional basking a avs
12 Te~evaluation, re-engincexing and modifications that came
“43 out of the investigation of the Comet and the reinvestiga-
14 tion of the Britannia. - :
15 i Q By reason of some mishap which had occurred?
16 : & Because of the Cer-2t dieastess. Tem not avere of
7ee7 mishaps on the Britannia that called for this.
18, Q Now do you think you have adequately described the
19 nature of the offerings made by Bristol end the relstions
20cf TWA to Bristol?

oy A Well, as I said, I am quite sure Bristol approached
t|

& 22 TWA after that sequence, but I seem to draw a blank right

i!
23 now as to what it was.

24 . QQ Have you fully rae «adequately described the partict
He | 25 gation of Mr. Hughes or the Hughes Tool Company or any 4

+ ; i.
: : tad 5d ‘ mtative of the t HughaerteckeGam mets | yD ral t 4-3 5-

a } "DX 43, page 473
ee uate (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. eeaaies)*

7

Romrel 473

“ hip?
KS
H A Well, to the extent that I presently recall it,

it
ee did not lose sight of the Britannia, it became a

‘competitive factor in the “tlantic.
% Iam referzing to the part played, if any, or the
. ontent to which a vert was plaved, ecithor by M+. Hughes or

ths Uoches Tesl Cenniny or any represoatetive ef the Hughes

~

29% GORE oye

Jee ‘ : . 4 2 $2 te .. e we ° » o 4): ° ..

11 | & Weil, cnat is “ail i recall at the moment, hr.
°225Vi8. i em Guice cuss thee we discussed the technical
i

featuses of the aizplane fron vise to time in the perspective |

, of jet developments, what could be leasned from it to be
; reapplied, and that sort of thing, but I don't remember any
; specifics, .
: Q The next manufacturer that I have listed is Short-
1g flarlan,
es A Yes. It hss pronosed prirnrily, as I recall it,
20 carzo aircraft in various sizes fron tim2 to time,
Short-Harlan used ‘to be Short Brothers, I believe.
22 | Tt is currently promoting, if you like, the use of a fairly
i tnoabie freighter that it has under development.
This was not a particularly active relationship,

d still isn't, although we did receive information from

2 oVe . * a, ° wla

——

ad

2 (Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. R an

ROBERT WILAND RUMMEL, resumed
the stand end testified further as follows :
EXAMINATION (Cont'd) BY MR, DAVIS:
Q During the luncheon recess, Mr. Rummel, has anything
else occurred to you that you haven't already identified or

o fo NY A ue fh hUWhCUWN

|| described?

hee Ba
o

MR. WILLIAMS: In connection with Short-Har lan?
MR, DAVIS: In connection with the manufacturers
“ho from time to time may have made offerings to the —
airline industry. Is there anything you would like to
add or change to your testimony to date?
A No, nothing occurred to me during luncheon, Mr. Davis
Q Was there anything which hes occurred to you since
you begen testifying here which you would like to modify eo

‘| change?
A No. .
Q The next manufacturer which 1 have on my list is Sui
Aviation, of Aviation Sud--whichever you prefer.
_ A 1 visited the Sud people in Paris and the Sud fac-
tory at Toulouse sometime before the first Carayhlie flew. ©
Q When was thet? : | . :
A~Probably in 1952 of 1953. 1 am not positive. 1 se

’ are .
(Excerpts from Deposition of Robert W. Rummel)"

_ Rummel 477
re bien on a tour through the facility, and had somewhat
| eeatous but interesting but technical discussions with
r cheir engineers--tedious because of the language problem.
A Generally I became familiar with what they were
P i mee and the stztus of the project, ate also the Sud
. facility, as well as their plans for producing the Caravelle.
d Sud from time to tine would send specifications and
other Sesériptive data pertaining to the Caravelle project
a to my heneas City office, Tg eht - this was a particu-
| larly intriguing airplane design because of the engine lo-
‘ , cation. | | |
a Part of the purpose of the visit was to try to es-
P tablish as best I could whether or not Sud appeared to have
is the capability of developing and producing an airplane in
7 | this category, and in direct competition with others with )
18 whom we had been dealing. | :
19 : The Caravelle was ordered by Air France who receiv-
0 ed the initial production lot, but additionally was sold to
2, Air Algiers and a number af other European airlines.
2 : Sometime later a Caravelle was flown across the
| 23 : Atlantic and flown on demonstration tour pretty much throuzh+
; : -out the United States, and if memory serves correctly,
% touched a certain number of countries of South America. ;
4

: Rummel 3 478-
of Sud, involving demonstrating the airplane to most of _
the major airlines, but additionally in promoting the gen-

eral cause of good U. S ,-French relations. I recall being
, told at the time that the cost of the project was being

shared by Sud and the French Government, although Sud is

in fact primarily owned, I believe, by the French Govern-

pe Se gs Oey bed *

POR Chie Sud had been: in at with my ities. I ar-

| ranged for the handling of the demonstration with our opera-

13 || tions department, and also arcanged for our publicity people
14 to work with the local Chamber of Commerce and with Sud to-
15 wards setting up various meetings with town people that Sud

16 7} wanted to meet with, This was a number o£ months in ad-

i
17 | vance of the actual demonstration, as I recall it. I had

8 the impression that this had been done elsewhere by Sud.

19 : The airplane arrived at Kansas City, and was demon-

20 ' strated: to two or three plane loads of TWA personnel in

21 / combination with town officiais and other prominent citi-
22 || zens that Sud had invited and who had accepted, I went on
23 || one of the flights and was tremendously Paperebly impressed —

! 24 with the comfort. of the ite me from the passenger s point
25

j
{
|

‘

of view. ;

"Dx 43 79
(Excerpts from Sanenktlen of Robert W. Rummel)"

Kummel oe GIS |
Bie jeleared by Sud management to fly in the airplane. One was

fester Lindbergh, and one was Mr. Hughes. They advised

2
4 | they wanted to demonstrate if at all possible the airplane
5
6.

to Mr. Hughes ° oo

; I got in touch with Mr. Hughes. I don't recall

7 jiiabiee I left word at the Hughes' office or whether it was

y iin the course of another call, but I recall advising him of

:9 hte, and irdicating my belief that the aixplane hed stro.y
:, 10, : paesenger:. -appeal, although I recall indicating 1 wasn't .

j 1 then sufficiently familiar with the mechanical detail of

B ‘ the airplane to comment on the practicality of the system' s

It was either then or in a subsequent call which
vould heve been fanrroximately at thet cone time, Mr, Burhes
2 Fequested that the airplane be flown to the Hughes Aircraft

17} | adzpore at Culver City so that he might inspect it and fly
18

19

' | in it. I approached Sud with this in mind, and was able

_to report back to iir. Hughes in due course, “—e in a
“fairly brief interval of time, that Sud was wv willing to fly
4 i the airplane to Los Angeles, and that in order to make it
—. it was willing to readjust and rearrange its
|, Semonstration schedule to the extent that might be desired,
‘et | at¢hougn they hoped it would not require much. I think
hey planned to have . We airplane available one day or a

. 3 Tem eh at Te -

*
@ ,%ee

[Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.]

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386414_0039%3A11. Public record. Not legal advice.
