# Brief for Respondent — Trbovich v. Mine Workers

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386413_0337%3A09

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Brief for Respondent
- **Published:** January 1, 1972
- **Citation:** 404 U.S. 528

## Text

prot . my |
cl , U.S. |
NoT1-l19
Gn the Supreme Gourt of the- Wnited States
ae Ocroser Tero, 1971 |

MIKE TRBOVICH, a
v. -_

UnitEp MINE Workers, FT At.

“h

7

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
“ APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ie]

BRIEF FOR THE SECRETARY OF LABOR

4

ERWIN N. GRISWOLD, ,
, Solicitor General,

L. PATRICK GRAY III,
Assistant Attorney General,
_ HARRY R. SACHSE,
Assistant to the Solicitor General,
WALTER H. FLEISCHER, , -
‘RAYMOND D. BATTOCCHI, ~ .

. | ppp | A
Department of Jus

| Washington, D.C. 20530.
RICHARD F. SCHUBERT, (\

Solicitor,
GEORGE T. AVERY, © , . “
Associate Solicitor, a
, BEATE BLOCH, ‘ -.
Attorney, : 8
Department of Labor, .
Washington, D.C. 20216.

“

,
o>

. Se aed
6 OR BLADE OULLL IRL 0! DDE ALOE OP GOS

e 7 e
Ase . ree = SK, DRIEST. Meatless cae RINT ER TARE RIE as WOO eae Wie LETS ate eae 4 y oe ae
.
.
.
‘ :
. °
. _
. ‘
‘
.
-
- : >
.
-
.
o~
.
.
e
-
t
’
‘
*
.
*-
. ¢
.
° ‘ -
.
°° .
. .
e .
7 . .
.

-INDEX

Opinions below-__-_-_----------88
Jurisdiction. ------e

4, Decisions ghd orders below. eee :
Summary of argument_____________ me eee aise
Argument:

I. The statutory scheme of the Act and this .

Court’s decisions interpreting it are
inconsistent with petitioner’s claimed

right of intervention, <relememmere

II. The legislative history of the Act is
inconsistent with petitioner’s claimed

right of intervention jcmpmeese

III. The Secretary’s consistent inte rpretation
of the’statute should be followed unless

there are compelling indications that

it is Wrong__---_---

IV. Federal Rule 24 does not puters peti-
tioner’s intervention..____. _____.__
Conclusion_-_.--2------ =

14

to
bho

31

32

39

Il

CITATIONS

Cases:

Acuff v. United Papermakers and Paper-
workers, 404 1°. 2d 169, certiorari denied, Page
394 US. 987____ 33

Alleghany Corporation v. Kirby, 344 F. 2d a7 1,
certiorari granted, sub. nom. Holt v. -\lle-
gheny Corp., 381 U.S. 933, certiorari dis-
missed, 884 U.S. 28.088 33

Biodensien v. Boyle, 329 I. app. 1089____- 8, 35

Cathoon v. Harvey, 379 U.S. 134. ___.- 10, 15, 18, 32

Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural

Gas Co., 386 U.S. 129.02 37
Hodgson vy. Local 67 99, United Steel W orkers of

-lmerica, 403 U.S. 3338_--. 19
International Union, UAW y. Scofield, 382

U.S. 205__.- 22 12, 19, 20
Eupion Mfg. Co. v. United States, 388 U.S.

BO gc et en op es i nk 37

Martin v. Kalvar Corp., 441 F.2d 552... = _-
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Commu-

‘ necations Commission, 395 U.S. 367_____- 31
Shultz v.- United Steelworkers of -[merica,

‘District 15, 312 F. Supp. 1044___. 21,22
Shultz v. United Steelworkers of Ameriéa,

District 19, 318 F. Supp. 549... 21, 22
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1228. 32

Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education,
427. F. 2d 1352, certiorari denied sub nom.
Alexander v. Pasadena City Board of Educa-

tion, 402 U.S. 948... 38
Stadin Vv. Union E lectric Company, 309 I. 2d

6 ne ee A 33
Stein v. Wirtz, 366 F. 2d ISS, certiorari

denied, 386 U.S. 996.---- 6-8 21, 22

Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 122 31

Ill

Cases—Continuied
United States v. Atlantic Richfield Company,

90 F.R.D. 369, affirmed sub nom. Bartlett,

etal. v. United States, 401 US. 986__-2
United States v. Automobile Manufacturers

_ -lss’n, 307 FE, Supp. 617, affirmed sub nom.
City of New York vy. United States, et al.,

397 U.S. 248

Page

United States v. Harper & Row Publishers, .

Ine. (N.D. IIL, E.D., November 27, 1967),
affirmed -sub nom ( ‘ity of New York y.
United States, 390 US. 715__ eee eee
Cnited States y. Purdmouni Pictures, Lune.
(S.D.N.Y. Eq. No. 87-273, March 22, 1971.
affirmed sub nom. Syufy Enterprises, Inc. v.
United States, No. 70-329, decided October
12, 1971-27 eet

sub nom. Clark Walter and Sons, Inc. "vy.
United States, 392 U.S.659.....
Wirtz v. Hotel, Motel and Club Employees
Wnton, Local 6,391 U.S.492, 00
Wordz v. Local Union No. 12, etc., Operating
Engineers, 66 LRR\M 2080; 56 L.C. § 12,153

37
32

Wirtz v. Local Union No. 125, Laborers’ Inter- .

national Union, 389 U.S. 477...
Wertz v. Local 153, Glass Bottle Blowers lssn.,
389 U.S. 462... ere 14, 18,

19, 34

IV

_ Cases—Continued .
Wirtz v. Local Union No. 1377, 288 F. Supp. page
| nen Be eee 22
Yablonski v. United Mine Workers ‘(D.D.C.)-
Civ. No. 3436-69. ___. 1]
Statutes and rules: _ =
Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure

Act of 1959, 73 Stat. 519, 29 U.S.C. 401
et seq.:

7 Section 101(a)(1), 29 U.S.C: 411(a)(1)- 14
Section 102, 29 U.S.C. 412_.___ [5,35
Section 201, 29 U.S.C. 431___________ 10
Section 206, 29 U.S.C. 486.022.2228. 38
' Section 208, 29 U.S.C. 488_______ 8 15
Section 210, 29 U.S.C. 440__ 22 15,26
Section 401, 29 U.S.C. 481-020 15
Section 401(¢), 29 U.S.C. 481 (0) 2-8 15, 23
. Section 402, 29 U.S.C. 482. ___- 2, 16, 25, 22,86
Section 402(a), 29 U.S.C. 482(a)_- 2 8 16, 36 —
Section 402(b), 29 U.S.C. 482(b)_-- | 16
Section 403, 29 U.S.C. 483.02 2-8. _-. 2,16, 2s
Section 403(a), 29 U.S.C. 483(a)_____ — 39
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
Rule 23(1)(e)_ ee. 3s
tule 24.02 2. oe Id, 32
| Rule 24(a)_---- ee a 13, 32.
Miscellaneous: ; =
104 Cong. Ree. 7953. eee eee - 23
104 Cong. Rec. 10947* 23,25
104 Cong. Rec. 10999. ee = 26
104 Cong. Rec. 11487____-- ee = at
104 Cong. Ree. 1I8288______ ee 26
105 Cong. Rec. 6745. ------- e289
105 Cong. Rec. IS116___-- ee —— 30

Summers, Judiical Reguiation of Union.
Elections, 70 Yale L.J. 1222.-- 1-2 23

Committee on Education and Labor, 86th Page
Cong., Ist Sess. 88 30
Hearings Before the Subeommittee on Labor
of the Senate Committee on Libor end
Public Welfare, 86th Cong., Ist Session. ___ 28, 39
H.R. 840000022 30
H. Rep. No. 1147, 86th Cong., 2d Sess 30
105 Cong. Ree. 17919.) 30
_ 105 Cong. Rec. 18153.- 30
8.505020 27, 28, 29
S. 7482000 es a ne ee 27, 28°
S. ee or ae 29
8.87510 23, 24
S. 3974.0 24, 26
S.. Rep. No. 1684, 85th Cong. 2d Sess _ _ 24
S. Rep. No. 187, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. 29

D.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386413_0337%3A09. Public record. Not legal advice.