# Appendix — National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co. > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386413_0136%3A02 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Appendix - **Published:** January 1, 1970 - **Citation:** 396 U.S. 258 ## Text Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1968 No. 925 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, — J. H. Rutter REX MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., ET AL., Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT INDEX Page Chronological List of Relevant Docket Entries - Soe 1 Supplemental Decision and Order of the National Labor Re- lations Board, dated June 6, 1966 - LSE 3 Preliminary Intermediate Report and Order of the Trial Ex- aminer, dated January 23, 1963 .. keine . 18 Trial Examiner’s Supplemental Decision in Back Pay Pro- ceeding, dated June 2, 1964... nn 39 Back Pay Specification and Notice of Hearing issued No- vember 16, 1961, (pages 1 thru 6 and 213 thru 429) = 316 Respondent’s Answer to Back a onscacnarenees with Exhibit A attached _ " 588 Respondent’s Amended Answer to Back Jrsindh nena with Exhibits A thru F attached _ vive 601 ii INDEX Excerpts from Transcript of Proceedings— Witnesses: Loren P. Jones RE eae Re-direct je Philip Lampert Bessie Cooper Lee I ile peli hdd esicipipscnetlccscaincishaccnceinssach gia 653 J. J. Hooley Direct 653 General Counsel’s Exhibit 7; the records of the following employees : vie... SGS RSE ELEC re ae ae 659 Sonora Barnes (Rochon)... 660 I I ina Gloria Delpit 668 Mathilda Delpit.. .. 669 a ES Re RS tae ale 672 Pearl Ferguson iaaitneeanhsoa initia bana shdansies tic 674 Minnie Fernandez ____ 676 Gustavia Haynes (Gale). its 681 Victoria Henderson ___ 68 Rose Marie Hicks __ me 689 Louise Jackson i Dieee Selves - 693 Lela Mae Coston Landry... 696 Leonard Lewis a 698 i cee he ETRE es el Ce Oe 700 ue EE OR. Gloria Matthews 709 Desideria Ocampo Mildred Proctor _ Wilhelmina Ray (Blanchard) _ INDEX Dorothy B. Rubit a. Tere Cac se eccchininersierinetisensiciontonsnnunitinsntninnsion sotinceinstedane Alma Wallace __------ UES Fannie Watford —.. 2 eres ee Fee a ee eS General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 8 _.. General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 9 General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 10 General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 11. General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 12... Respondent’s Exhibit No. 6 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 7... Respondent’s Exhibit No. 10 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 13 _...._-_-_»______ Respondent’s Exhibit No. 18 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 30. Respondent’s Exhibit No. 38 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 48 ____. Respondent’s Exhibit No. 50 Deets Eee No. 2] eeeesSSC Respondent’s Exhibit No. 52 = Respondent’s Exhibit No. 66A... Respondent’s Exhibit No. 66B === Respondent’s Exhibit No. 73 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 74 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 75 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 80 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 81 __ Respondent’s Exhibit No. 84... Respondent’s Exhibit No. 86 __ 1v INDEX Respondent’s Exhibit No. 94 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 95 Respondent’s Exhibit No.96 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 97 Respondent’s Exhibit No.98 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 113 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 124 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 128 . : Respondent’s Exhibit No. 180.0 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 133 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 134 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 187 ____ Respondent’s Exhibit No. 189 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 144 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 172 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 173 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 195 Respondent’s Exhibit No. 201 __. 809 Motion of J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. for an order directing the Regional Director io refrain from proceeding with Back Pay hearing with the following exhibits attached: ‘811 Exhibits B, C and D ca er, A 825, 826, 827 Supplemental Exhibit II(a) _ : 831 Supplemental Exhibit II(b) 899 Supplemental Exhibit II (c) ; 900 Appendices to brief of National Labor Relations Board on motion to enjoin back pay proceeding: Affidavit of John F. LeBus, dated March a 902 Letter to J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. from Charles M. Paschal, Jr. dated August 21,1957... its 904 Letter to J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. from John F. LeBus, t,t | i — INDEX Brief in support of Motion to Stay filed by J. H. Rutter- I IN cise fiictteciriaecniennientiniacemslcandeenahsemnnptsmntante Supplemental Brief in — of Motion to Gaal filed . J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co... es Excerpts from Transcript of Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Opinion of the Court of Appeals, dated July 23, 1968 Judgment of the Court of Appeals, dated August 26, 1968 __ Order denying petitions for rehearing en banc, dated October I cdieiaserchueabrhcatetsiiicccserinintsns tesla btihnisinpinthicstastneecestittie Order granting certiorari... 588 G. C. 1(m) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FIFTEENTH REGION Cases Nos. 15-CA-721, 15-CA-723 Received, NLRB 15th Reg., New Orleans, LA., Sep. 4, 3:28 P.M., 62 /s/al J. H. RUTTER-REX MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INc. and AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO BACKPAY SPECIFICATION Now comes J. H. RUTTER-REX MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., respondent herein, and in reply to the Backpay Specification filed herein on November 16, 1961, avers: 1 That because of the illegal, unwarranted and prejudi- cial delays of the Regional Director of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD in this proceeding, and because of the speculative premises relied upon by the Regional Director in preparing the Backpay Specification and the schedules to which it refers, respondent is un- able to respond to the Backpay Specification in the fully detailed manner apparently required by the literal pro- visions of Section 102.54 of the Rules and Regulations of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. Re spondent accordingly filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit a motion to stay the backpay hearing which was set by the Regional Director for January 29, 1962, and attaches hereto, as a part of this answer as Exhibit A, a copy of the opinion of the 589 Court of Appeals in which the Court states that the Board has ‘een guilty of inordinate delays in the han- dling of this case. Respondent now files this answer re- serving the right to supplement the same at such time as the position of the Regional Director in the Backpay Specification is clarified and as further details become available to the respondent during the course of prepara- tion for the hearing and during the course of the hearing itself. 2 Answering Article I of the Backpay Specification, re- spondent denies that any employee listed in Article I thereof is entitled to the payment of any backpay what- soever. Respondent admits that certain of its employees in a strike which commenced on April 21, 1954. Respondent further admits that applications for rein- statement were received from some of the employees listed in Article I of the Specification, but denies that any ap- plication for reinstatement was received from the follow- ing employees at any time between the date on which the strike terminated and the date on which the Backpay Specification was filed: ALEXCEE, Irene LESENE, Amelia ALLEN, Victoria LODGE, Kathleen BARNES, Sonore (Rochon) MARTIN, Noel BREAUD, Leonce MORRISON, Elouise (Epps) COOPER, Bessie (Lee) OCAMPO, Desrderia CORNISH, Estella TAYLOR, Mary DAVIS, Georgiana THOMPSON, Lila Coston FULTON, Vera THORNTON, Rosalie GAMBLE, Indiana (Plummer) WALKER, Hattie HAYNES, Ida WEATHERSBY, Dorothy HOLDEN, Helen WALKER, Marjorie SMITH, Leonardine WALLACE, Alma 3 Answering Article II of the Specification, respondent objects to the method used by the BOARD in computing backpay for the following reasons: Respondent contends that if it should be determined that backpay is due to any employee, which is denied, 590 the liability of respondent to that employee should be computed by reference to the performance and earnings of said employee before and/or after the strike, and not be referring to the alleged average earned by other em. ployees during the backpay period. Even if it were relevant to compute backpay in thig instance by averaging the earnings of other employees, respondent objects to sub-part 1 of Article II of the Spe cification because the selection of the 101 incumbent and 82 replacement employees referred to by the BOARD in its computations is an inaccurate and prejudicial basis for computing the liability of the company. The BOARD has selected a majority of employees whose earnings are above the plant average and has also selected employees whose earnings are above the average earned by all of the operators on the particular operation on which the selected employees were employed. The result of the se lection of above-average employees in determining the amount which the BOARD claims would have been earned by the alleged discriminatees is to increase the amounts allegedly due to said discriminatees, many of whom were untrained employees, many of whom were learners, and many of whom were earning less than the guaranteed minimum rate in effect in the plant for experienced oper- ators on the date of the strike. The BOARD has not considered the earning record of the alleged discrimina- tees before the strike, and has assumed facts which lead to the conclusion that the respondent paid higher wages than any employer with whom any alleged discriminatee found employment during the period covered by the Specification. With reference to sub-part 2 of Article II, respondent objects to parts (b) and (c) because the BOARD has assumed that a vacation payment was due each year to any employee on the company payroll and has ignored the actual details of the company’s vacation plan. Simi- larly, the BOARD has assumed that a “bonus” was auto- matically due to each alleged discriminatee at Christmas without regard to the requirement in the company plan that an employee be continuously employed during a 5- year period before a second week’s vacation is due to 591 that employee, which second week is normally payable at | Christmas time and has thus become popularly referred to as a Christmas bonus. With regard to sub-part 3 of Article II, respondent objects to part (a) thereof in which the Board has cate- gorized cutters, spreaders, and clicking machine opera- tors together in Group 1 in order to compute average earnings, whereas in truth and in fact these classifica- tions are paid on a separate and distinct basis. With further reference to sub-part 3 of Article II, re- spondent objects to the basis on which the average earn- ings of the male utility employees was computed in that the BOARD has included an assistant to the warehouse manager who was not in the unit for purposes of collec- tive bargaining, one John J. Lais, thereby raising the average above what any alleged discriminatee would have earned. With reference to sub-part 4 of Article II of the Speci- fication, respondent objects to the grouping of all female production employees in one group or classification with- out regard to the different operations upon which the said female production employees were employed. Re- spondent contends that a more proper basis of computing the earnings for the period covered by the Specification is to compute the earnings of each operator separately, and consider the results in relation to the actual earn- ings of an alleged discriminatee before and/or after the strike. With regard to sub-part 5, and referring to Groups 1 through 4, inclusively, respondent objects to the exclu- sion from the average of any employee employed for less than six months, Such exclusion has the effect of elimi- nating the earnings of irregular and irresponsible em- ployees from the computation of the average and has the further effect of increasing the vacation pay used in com- puting the average in the Specification. With reference to Group 5, respondent objects to the selection of the in- cumbent and replacement employees on the arbitrary basis assumed by the BOARD because it has the effect of in- cluding in the average only those steady and experienced employees whose earnings are not indicative of the aver- age in the plant but whose earnings are above average. —¥ Further answering sub-part 5 of Article II, respondent alleges that the BOARD has computed average earnings by reference to those employees who were predominantly above average with the result that each alleged discrimi. natee referred to in the schedules, even though employed in plants which are in competition with respondent, and in some instances in plants which are operating under a contract with the AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, is alleged to have earned less for a comparable period of employment than the BOARD claims the same employees would have earned in respondent’s non-union plant. Answering sub-paragraph 6 of Article II, respondent objects to the BOARD’s method of computing the alleged gross backpay, in that the BOARD has divided the bi- weekly wages of the incumbent and replacement employ- ees in a particular group by the total number of em- ployees in the group who show any earnings in the bi- weekly pay period. Such a method of computation dis- regards that number of employees who through absen- teeism may have no earnings in a particular pay period. Answering sub-paragraphs 9 and 10 of Article II of the Specification, respondent objects to the method of com- putation proposed by the BOARD in that such method has the effect of according vacation bonus benefits to employees who have not earned them simply because the average of said vacation and bonus benefits are given automatically to all employees under the BOARD’s method of computation. Further answering Article II, respondent objects to the BOARD’s method of computation because the BOARD does not take into consideration normal absenteeism in the plant, which, on the average, amounts to approxi- mately one day per employee per month, In addition, the BOARD has assumed that the alleged discriminatees would have worked steadily and without interruption for the entire period referred to in the Backpay Specifica- tion, which assumption is contrary to the experience of the plant. 592 | 593 4 Answering Article III of the Specification, respondent avers that it has complied in good faith with the obliga- tions imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in enforcing the BOARD’s order in this proceeding, and accordingly denies the correctness of ten ea area bed NG NS the computations set forth in the tables which are a part of Article III of the Specification. With regard to those columns in the schedules referred to as “Remarks”, “Interim Earnings”, and “Expenses”, respondent is without knowledge regarding any of the information reflected in said columns. However, respond- ent alleges on information and belief that in most, if not all, the cases referred to in the schedule attached to Ar- ticle III, the net interim earnings of the alleged discrim- _ inatees were higher than reflected in the schedule. eo SH Nicee RGA Aas ane 5 Answering Article IV of the Specification, respondent denies that it is indebted to any of the persons named therein for any amounts whatsoever, and further denies that any of the persons named in said article are entitled to reinstatement as of this date. And now further answering, respondent avers: 6 (1) Respondent had no obligation to rehire any striker who did not in good faith submit an application for re- instatement. In numerous instances, which will be point- ed out at the hearing, applications were received from strikers who were not serious about returning to work but who submitted an application merely on instructions from the union. In other instances strikers refused em- ployment when it was offered to them. In addition, no application was ever received from the employees listed in Article II of the answer. (2) Respondent is not obligated to rehire any em- ployee who engaged in improper conduct during the strike. Those strikers who were not employed for this reason were the following: naa 594 BICKMAN, Amanda LANIER, Elmarie BROWN, Elvera M. LANIER, Ernestine DANDRIDGE, Dorothy LARRIEU, Louis GREEN, Jimmie Lou LEWIS, Doris GRIFFIN, Audry LEWIS, Leonard T., Jr. HICKS, Rose Marie SMITH, Leonardine JOHNSON, Maybelle SMITH, Octavia WASHINGTON, Lula Mae (3) Respondent had no obligation to rehire any em- ployee on the basis of the union’s letter of April 4, 1955, which terminated the strike. In many instances the schedule accompanying Article III of the Backpay Speci- fication lists April 5, 1955, as the date upon which an alleged discriminatee applied for reinstatement. As a matter of fact, the Company received no applications whatsoever on this date and accordingly denies that it had any obligation to rehire a striker unless and until an application was submitted. (4) Respondent is not obligated to hire any employee for whom respondent had no work on the date upon which such employee applied. In order to maintain pro- duction at an efficient level it was necessary to avoid disrupting respondent’s balanced line operation by the indiscriminate placing of inexperienced learners in key positions in the line. This would have destroyed the effi- ciency of the line, and resulted in less production and fewer jobs. (5) Respondent was not obliged to rehire any striker who did not seek reinstatement within a reasonable time following the termination of the strike. (6) During all the time covered by the Specification, the respondent maintained a standing order for employ- ees with the United States Employment Service and from time to time inserted advertisements in the local press seeking employees. Respondent alleges that any of its employees who went on strike and who seriously sought reemployment would have maintained contact with re spondent in order to obtain work when work was avail- able. On information and belief, respondent alleges that many of the alleged discriminatees were not serious about returning to work for respondent, but rather submitted 595 an application upon suggestion from the union in the hope that at some future date they would be found eligi- ble for the payment of backpay. (7) Respondent further avers that the Regional Direc- tor and/or the BOARD, by delaying for approximately 41% years the filing of the Backpay Specification, has failed to discharge the duty placed upon it by Section 102.52 of the Rules and Regulations of the BOARD, and has failed to comply with the affirmative requirement of Section 6 of the Administrative Procedure Act. By such failure to comply with the dtuies placed upon it by law, the Regional Director and/or the BOARD has prejudiced the rights of the respondent by permitting the accrual of excessive backpay and, through the passage of time, rendering difficult, if not impossible, an adequate defense to the facts alleged in the 428 pages of the Backpay Specification. Because of the illegal, unwarranted, and prejudicial delay which has occurred, all to the detriment of respondent, and in spite of respondent’s request for the cooperation of the BOARD in the matter of compli- ance with its Order as enforced by the Court of Appeals, the Regional Director and the Board should be estopped from construing the Order which has been enforced in this case as a punitive Order requiring respondent to pay backpay for the period of the BOARD’s own delays. (8) Respondent further avers that the Court of Ap- peals for the Fifth Circuit, in enforcing the BOARD’s Order in this proceeding, did not contemplate literal com- pliance with the requirement in the BOARD’s Order that each striker who reapplied be given employment within the 5-day period referred to in the BOARD’s Order. On the contrary, respondent avers that the Circuit Court of Appeals recognized the practical difficulties which had been urged to the Court by respondent in support of its contention that the original BOARD Order was a puni- tive and not remedial one, and intended that the BOARD consider these difficulties in determining respondent’s ob- ligations under the Decree. Respondent avers that it has made a good faith effort to rehire all of the strikers who applied for reinstatement within a reasonable time after the termination of the By ae a MES a oie ian : : s Main- has ac- sOARD ‘ackpay ad that proper. ling iROWN EDULE OF AVERAGE QUARTERLY EARNINGS Groups 1 through 5 5 REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES -tele "REO LEIA BELLE IS NEES AS: ERR RD BENE 2 BE Bal ER EM G 3 atts SS — = T ach Sh /I95s- ine | ms, ie, /25e- int t ad to /95S # o4 Za dite PL S45 F 4" y c ach 31, FS Zo, 115 6 141912. tind 46/95 Pon | cedure 21, LIEL Sel Ae ‘Wie BY) aq Lose $1 185 7 Lge nor sip SIS 7 I ctimbar 40/957 11 isle | ead, $f IS7 As) 12g hosel '.3/, 415-8 Lik io. /959 | WY Ler doy 95% | te H,1IFS fa} ||| beled | vol ee || | Bieta ||| bigiso ab st B04 yar Done 21/959 ne 63S aac h Zo 1959 } 2 in 1) | ken ctimntus 2p, 195-9 a8 | oid, f | 7 41 LIED msl 9Ft ||| bah 439 3: stole ||| bwllall ||| I We it es % 31,194. 0 : {Ns Ji tie 74 i] A 741 a 20,146 0 itty qi yi baz ‘4 ane e f 4p 1960 EL a! aa lL Ws¢aaa n : OE CE GF" co _hadedl | bay Bh.uh ||| basa Ys. wah 317796] Se, TTA Th | TT Beds ] Ze 196) C WL hd Lt pede With Kimber 26/961 Tr At rata 1 PHAM at) tb Pernbin iy L496 L_ | Basi} | Toa pense 7 thn Tiree {Ty ¥ tty | CREE Saas: | TIT 613 rewe 2 stu f 8 3 i? il e BO ow OE e | Te Ty NANO | HLH me HH 523 | +H 1 | ; 4 es | 11493695) | | fo 482 " 1 s | 4 F-4 7 6 . Z ~ ch lg y aa lt | || Wasi mt “4 a fl yi E | HY CHS | | ; ll | gas 1 | ew “ty 1" | uly cll | | | Balai 2g Mh 5 shod | i Le ns by rl radial lil AN sy 127 “onl WT lb m7 Blok nee SANYAL | FB I57 3B 01 2426 air As v] bloo firk q | L f | a 450 7 r | Hd cal Te | 12 H HTL | blbla sl HH | 70 aod || ello TL] bho Ae | ata || | bigislo | ‘Be BAAF Baal yt | | | Wpbl az (alea| mae / ae aslo? us It | ke AHH fla 24 | 4 pil 7/8) 94 1 || eles etl || | bulla || |p 4 +111 by nsi24 Mods | { yee LL {LL | Fatale souls | : ne ee Ud | aa A | | haabe sf noel | baal 4 st || | Wesel 4 Seasieay | bail bowls |i | Henk | nsanel | id! | war | | | Hin We Tha ih | Lb TOTTI Tpaploal det} | Pe rite! Ht eg Aptech Be Heed | dh ‘| BYDASI |: Vulnn eee it LiL J t AS a 1 BIA “flea! Pe oae aied AHL daa aaai “ seat 1 pooyig | 6aye HERR CATT nis THOTT TTT TT at a Oa eee one 615 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(a) BICKHAM, Amanda BROWN, Elvira DANDRIDGE, Dorothy GREEN, Jimmie Lou GRIFFIN, Audrey Mae HAYNES, Gustavia HICKS, Rose Marie LANIER, Elmarie LANIER, Ernestine LARRIEU, Louis LEWIS, Doris LEWIS, Leonard SMITH, Leonardine SMITH, Octavia WASHINGTON, Lula Mae SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(b) ALEXANDER, Estrella ALEXCEE, Irene ALLEN, Victoria BANKS, Marion BARNES, Sanora BERRY, Ira Mae BREAUD, Leonce COLUMBUS, Juanita COOPER, Bessie CORNISH, Estell DAVIS, Georgiana DAVIS, Lenora EDGERSON, Shirley Mae FULTON, Vera GAMBLE, Indiana Plummer HAYNES, Ida HILL, Bertha HOLDEN, Helen HUBBARD, Ruth JOHNSON, Eunice JOHNSON, Olivia LANDRY, Lila Coston LaROCHE, Sophie LESENE, Amelia LODGE, Kathleen MARTIN, Eliska MARTIN, Noel MORRISON, Eloise Epps MYERS, Mandy OCAMPO, Desderia RANDALL, Edna RUBIT, Dorothy B. THORNTON, Rosalie WALKER, Hattie WALKER, Marjorie WALLACE, Alma WASHINGTON, Dorothy WEATHERSBY, Dorothy SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(c) Claimant CARTER, Mary Louise CERF, Raymond CLAY, Helen HARRIS, Freddie HOLLINGSHED, Jennie PATTERSON, Elnora WASHINGTON, Beatrice WILLIAMS, Helen WILLIAMS, Marion Applied 4/20/55 5/19/55 9/20/55 5/ 9/55 10/10/55 6/14/55 8/ 3/55 2/22/56 1/24/56 Hired 4/25/55 5/19/55 9/20/55 5/10/55 10/10/55 6/15/55 8/ 3/55 2/22/56 1/24/56 BIPEDAL OI LIU LEED GALLE IN OLR III 616 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(d) Claimant ALEXANDER, Iworner ALONZO, Caledonia ANDERSON, Beatrice ANDERSON, Carrie ANDERSON, Dora ANGRUM, Ida Mae AUGUST, Gloria AULTMAN, Clarinda BRIMMER, Bell BROOKS, Millie BROWN, Idele BROWN, Margarite BRYANT, Miriam BURKHALTER, Ola Mae BURNS, Elizabeth CARR, Katie Ruth COASTON, Lucille WOODS, Wilhelmina COSTON, Ethel COURSEAULT, Shirley CRAWFORD, Shirley Mae CROPPER, Clara DAVIS, Elvera DAVIS, Thelma DELPIT, Gloria DELPIT, Mathilda DIXSON, Gloria Mae DRAKE, Elizabeth DUCKETT, Norma DUFAUCHARD, Arthemise EDDINGTON, Isabella EVANS, Alice FARRIA, Vivian FERGUSON, Perl FOREMAN, Ethel FOUNTAIN, Geneva FRANKLIN, Zearlee GABRIEL, Geneva PEERED OLE LE LILI E NODE LOE SA LL SIE DIE ELE NL BOP MES EPEAT ES Applied 4/19/55 4/20/55 4/18/55 4/22/55 4/18/55 8/15/55 4/15/55 4/19/55 4/11/55 4/20/55 4/21/55 4/14/55 4/27/55 4/ 4/55 4/18/55 4/15/55 4/27/55 4/21/55 4/15/55 4/19/55 5/ 4/55 4/14/55 4/14/55 4/15/55 5/11/55 4/14/55 5/10/55 4/14/55 4/15/55 4/15/55 4/15/55 4/14/55 6/10/55 4/11/55 7/11/55 4/14/55 4/14/55 4/14/55 Hired 4/25/55 5/ 4/55 7/12/55 7/18/55 5/ 2/55 10/ 3/55 7/25/55 7/25/55 5/26/55 7/26/55 7/25/55 7/19/55 5/12/55 4/28/55 7/12/55 7/25/55 7/11/55 8/19/55 5/23/55 5/16/55 7/12/55 5/25/55 7/20/55 5/30/55 No vacancy in classification 8/15/55 No vacancy in classification 4/25/55 8/ 3/55 4/28/55 4/25/55 7/12/55 8/ 8/55 8/ 8/55 No vacancy in classification 5/ 2/55 5/30/55 7/25/65 eS 617 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(d)—(Continued) — aig eee Claimant Applied Hired GANT, Mary 4/ 8/55 7/18/55 ‘e GIVENS, Katherine 6/ 3/55 No vacancy in classification \ GREEN, Herise 4/19/55 6/20/55 GREEN, Louise 4/15/55 4/28/55 GRIFFIN, Ethel 4/14/55 4/26/55 GRIFFIN, Joyce 5/11/55 5/23/55 GUIDRY, Mary 4/14/55 8/26/55 HALL, Catherine 4/20/55 6/ 3/55 HAMILTON, Viola 4/18/55 5/ 2/55 HUGHES, Minnie Bell 5/12/55 7/26/55 JACKSON, Eleanora 7/12/55 8/15/55 JOHNSON, Louella 4/20/55 8/ 3/55 JOHNSON, Virginia 4/29/55 8/ 5/55 JONES, Edna 4/19/55 4/22/55 : JONES, Shirley Mae 10/28/55 12/ 7/55 JOSHUA, Olivia 5/10/55 6/ 6/55 KEELER, Johnnie Mae 4/25/55 8/ 4/55 KELLY, Dorothy Harris 5/25/55 5/17/55 KIMBLE, Alnetta 4/21/55 4/28/55 LaROSE, Gertrude 4/15/55 6/ 9/55 LeBEAU, Edna 4/18/55 5/ 5/55 ’ LEE, Ruby 4/18/55 4/26/55 McKENNIE, Leotha 4/28/55 12/ 5/55 MARGIN, Elenor 4/11/55 8/ 8/55 ; MARSHALL, Dorothy 4/14/55 4/28/55 _ MATTHEWS, Gloria 5/ 5/55 7/25/55 _ MONETTE, Roberta 4/14/55 4/25/55 r- MOTEN, Lena Dixon 4/18/55 4/26/55 NEWTON, Rosie Lee 4/22/55 7/12/55 NICHOLAS, Clotilde 6/17/55 8/ 2/55 PARKER, Shirley 4/25/55 7/14/55 PARNELL, Evone 9/ /55 No vacancy in classification PENN, Gloria 4/18/55 5/ 2/55 PHILLIPS, Louise 4/18/55 7/26/55 POWELL, Melvina 6/ 6/55 7/25/55 RAPP, Gloria 4/20/55 4/28/55 RAY, Wilhelmina 4/21/55 No vacancy in classification REED, Dorothy Kearney 8/16/55 No vacancy in classification ania a te LSS aE ee ee Tn 618 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(d)—(Continued) Claimant REEVES, Nerlie RICHARD, Pearl RICHARDSON, Rose RUBIT, Dorothy P. SANDERS, Ada SAWYER, Ellen SCOTT, Dolores SEATON, Rebecca SIMPSON, Lilly Mae SONIA, Rose Mary STEWARD, Millie Lee TAPLIN, Dorothy Mae THOMAS, Lovenia THOMAS, Mary THOMAS, Midnonette THORNTON, Jesenu VALENTINE, Hilda WATSON, Mabel WILLIAMS, Alice WOODFORK, Yvonne MAGEE, Vivian MOORE, Leola Applied 4/27/55 4/12/55 4/15/55 4/22/55 4/14/55 4/22/55 4/18/55 4/19/55 5/ 2/55 6/ 6/55 4/21/55 4/18/55 4/25/55 4/15/55 8/ 5/55 4/19/55 4/14/55 4/27/55 4/19/55 5/ 9/55 4/18/55 5/ 4/55 6/15/55 6/ 6/55 7/12/55 7/13/55 10/ 3/55 5/11/55 4/28/55 5/16/55 8/ 1/55 6/29/55 7/25/55 5/ 3/55 7/13/55 6/13/55 — No vacancy in classification 8/15/55 7/13/55 7/25/55 5/30/55 7/25/55 12/ 5/55 8/ 4/55 | 619 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(e) Claimant BENTLEY, Helen BROWN, Bessie BRUMFIELD, Ruth CHERI, Miriam CLEMENTS, Lilly Mae DENLEY, Alice Theresa FERNANDEZ, Minnie Mae GREEN, Dorothy HEAD, Marguerite HENDERSON, Victoria JACKSON, Louise MEREDITH, Geraldine NASH, Adele PROCTOR, Mildred RECASNER, Isabelle Jenkins WATFORD, Fanny Mae WHITE, Beatrice WOODRIDGE, Estella ZENO, Audry Date Reported (if at all) 9/18/61 Never reported Never reported 3/29/56 Never reported Did not report until 10/18/60 12/ 5/56 Never reported Never reported Never reported Never reported Never reported 4/ 3/56 Never reported 12/ 4/61 Never reported Respondent attempted contact-claimant out of town-dates unknown to respondent Requested Applied to Report 8/ 8/55 9/19/55 and 3/29/56 4/19/55 7/11/55 4/15/55 T/ /55 5/ 3/55 3/29/56 5/15/55 = 7/19/55 5/25/55 4/ 3/56 4/18/55 1956 4/18/55 7/13/55 4/19/55 7/18/55 5/17/55 = =7/20/55 5/25/55 8/55 4/15/55 7/18/55 4/21/55 4/28/55 4/15/55 3/29/56 7/24/55 12/28/55 4/19/55 8/ 3/55 4/20/55 7/22/55 Unknown to respondent 4/15/55 7/12/55 Never reported SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(f) CAMPBELL, Roe DUN, Stella JOHNSON, Maybelle ROBERTSON, Adele (not interested) (pregnant) (not interested) (pregnant) 7 620 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(g) Claimant Applied BURNS, Hazel 10/13/55 FONTERBERRY, Cleo 11/ 4/55 GREEN, Genevieve 11/ 9/665 CLARK, Catherine Jeff 1/25/56 JOLLY, Ruth Joyce 11/ 7/55 LEARSON, Dorothy White 10/ 6/58 LOTTEN, Herbert 11/ 7/55 LYONS, Lorraine 5/11/56 MONTGOMERY, Bessie Brown 1957 NEWMAN, Marictta 8/12/58 PARKER, Anna 10/ 6/58 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(h) Claimant Applied BOWLES, Doris 4/27/55 BOZONIER, Marguerite 4/18/55 aired 8/ 3/56 8/ 5/55 Discharged 9/ 2/55 8/23/55 DARENSBOURG, Irma Ray 6/17/55 Not indicted in Quit personnel file FRANCES, Edna 4/14/55 LEWIS, Audrey Ann 4/14/55 LOCKETT, Marie 4/15/55 MARSHALL, Willie Lee 8/16/55 MOORE, Orelia 4/22/55 7/55 7/13/55 8/ 3/55 8/29/55 5/ 2/55 8/12/55 8/23/55 8/17/55 12/29/55 5/10/55 SCHEDULE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(i) BROWN, Evangeline Clark JOHNSON, Verna ROLLINS, Geraldine SHELTON, Clara TAYLOR, Mary Lee —7-_7~—~"" 621 AFFIDAVIT ORLEANS PARISH LOUISIANA Personally came and appeared EUGENE J. RUTTER, who, after being duly sworn, deposed and said that he is the President of J. H. RUTTER-REX MANUFACTUR- ING COMPANY, INC., respondent in the foregoing amended answer; that he has read the same and knows the contents thereof and that the same are true and cor- rect. In any instance in which an allegation is made on information and belief, respondent believes said allega- tion to be true. /s/ Eugene J. Rutter EUGENE J. RUTTER SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED January 29, 1963. /s/ Peter H. Beer Notary Public My Commission is for Life CERTIFICATE I CERTIFY that I have served an original and four copies of the above and foregoing amended answer upon the Regional Director for the Fifteenth Region of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD by causing the same to be delivered to his office in New Orleans, this 29th day of January, 1963. /s/ H. J. READ HENRY J. READ 622 | matter has, with my approval, been withdrawn without prejudice. EXHIBIT A 15-95 [SEAL] NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FIFTEENTH REGION 820 Lowich Building, 2026 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans 13, Louisiana Telephone EX 2411 ‘ October 31, 1957 ; ; Re: J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company / New Orleans, Louisiana | 15-CA-843 : J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., 3725 Dauphine Street New Orleans, 17, Louisiana Gentlemen: . This is to advise that the Charge in the above-captioned i : Very truly yours, /s/ John F. LeBus JOHN F. LEBus Regional Director cc: Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO 2106 St. Bernard Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana TRY AA A ARE RE IES OG RUBS Be RE HR A ores ee: Mr. Philip Lampert, Regional Counsel Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America 333 S. Ashland Blvd. Chicago 7, Illinois Original mailed to Mr. Henry Read - 623 EXHIBIT B LAW OFFICES ERY, BARNETT, BROWN & READ MONTGOMFational Bank of Commerce Building 804-807 Na New Orleans 12, La. gomery Richard B. Montgtt Walter M. Barne’ Wood Brown Henry J. Read nmond John Phelps Ham Peter H. Beer ad, III John Walker Rea ——— September 11, 1957 Received, Sep. 12, 1957, : _ tl Office, New Orleans 13, La., NLRB. 15th Regiona National Labor oo — ; .Iding 820 Lowich Bui, avenue 2026 St. Charle:, New Orleans, L* PLEADED PPPOE ETE Attention: Mr. Fox Re: J. H. Rutter-Rex-Mfg. Co. * 15-CA-721 and 15-CA-723 Dear Sirs: This will advise that the notice which is a part of the decree was posted in the New Orleans plants of the em- ployer as of September 10th. POO RR PR TORE 9 1 OE The writer has passed on to the employer the request of the Board for such records as would be covered by Section 2 (c) of the decree and we will advise you as soon as the necessary records have been assembled. With reference to the posting of the notice in the Franklinton plant, the writer discussed with Mr. Paschal = —" the question of whether or not the notice which is a part of the decree should properly be posted in Franklinton in view of the fact that the unit for which the Amalga- mated Clothing Workers of America has been certified is limited to the New Orleans employees. Mr. Paschal sug- gested the possibility of a stipulation which would form the basis of an amendment to the decree insofar as the form of the notice to be posted in Franklinton is con- cerned. To this end we suggest an amendment to the notice which would exclude any reference to the respond- ent’s obligation to bargain with a particular union upon request, and we would appreciate your advising in due course whether the general counsel is disposed to join in a stipulation to that effect. 624 Yours very truly, MONTGOMERY, BARNETT, BROWN & READ By /s/ H. J. Read HENRY J. READ 625 EXHIBIT C LAW OFFICES MONTGOMERY, BARNETT, BROWN & READ 804-807 National Bank of Commerce Building New Orleans 12, La. Richard B. Montgomery Walter M. Barnett Wood Brown Henry J. Read John Phelps Hammond Peter H. Beer John Walker Read, III Albert Mintz October 24, 1957 Received, Oct. 25, 1957, 15th Regional Office, New Orleans 13, La., NLRB. PORE ae Na eR EG EE SE Bid RRO National Labor Relations Board 820 Lowich Building 2026 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, La. SAO Ia TP eg RR EAN, Attention: Mr. Fox Re: J. H. Rutter-Rex-Mfg. Co. 15-CA-721 and 15-CA-723 Dear Sirs: Fee ee OWT OM hd, Enclosed is a list of the employees on the payroll of the company at the time that the strike was called who applied for work after the strike terminated. Also re- flected is the date each applied for work following the termination of the strike and the date they were actually returned to work. a a Yours very truly, MONTGOMERY, BARNETT, BROWN & READ By /s/ Henry J. Read nb HENRY J. READ Encl. ' i + ¥ = a a" “~ Myyeas A MA 7 moo tLoU fee ~ayge/s aa “ sf Te =e} -asfoi,'s a“ A? tefii, > - LYE? aba leis - mow * cots adh aAspefy tahi/'s pa “athgh tysyS = Our aap» ‘a ae Oa fs 14/4, a -ayeifs wre a Laiif{ nem, pr -14/'fe ~4a/, > a /\ : alg s/h laf: AS a /\ : Po ae K —o~ 4% (Ss A x , by ae ” oferty ei oe: -eo (4 wih - vet Avaya “aa/t4 bs Fi etal i | dake ely he ag, eyo ratpechrec? ta aihes aylesis i FITZY Zo ME 2 4. gee — wk - /\ Ze ‘ al be nafe/# ff a ae rege maser, “es “eae eo % ~ A portent FN aly es 5 : ssdsay! ALLS -00/91fh ys OW 0h DMI Ae TU Tee to wat PAVE ‘“ssve sumssrne Vid wo atatus Pysysbeus qi L090 , NA gear v p/h ~44 iE 7o= ayy S balyfy Aa, Vs ee et el “A Ps! oad - A el) ws td ed A ia as se /4 tn 8 an a “ -“ “A a Fad A uw ws A “A P Ret ene.- Se - Ae re . £ - ‘ ¢ A oo a s - i . v N > %) "2 oe » _ » CA fo ay FON ee eve Lashify 5 NHB == yh 7 mote oe gy je. vas. e” ree Sve" vd Aan are Os * “e Pe Rs x we \ig’ Se”. Sales rg a ee 4 Sah es ae S ta ales . . * ae z . oe *. ba “7 “- a> a i, 2 SR ERE patel Nae weg . . *, Sa ar Amn SAL 7, «ot ™ ° 2 fs - PRGA I, Ro fete) Wee ders: TOE Fee oe AP GPRANAL CP COU 0%. x St Cmtenh en * Shs ; ate £m i b=) ge tie of ? a is wer ts ¥resty) “eS: mm rhaery ¢ ~ ery eS OP “Grtenty obvi, Ve a\ Te SN mi) ir? fe oof ref: e ip 3 (ft e, bs Py ate [A Vey $ e-,\ - Xe. if: ae /\ ~tAq CREASY 4 fF: “ é i* ons e et a hat: Mop fatc ° - . . a o = - ov POR ye SF ae af o> a tet ee fe . —*,. . rc eyes ACG pom — fee oy | A eo AEP NPP DPIIA ene “GRY ge” CS P i te oe Ae © ees KS oe Rie ¢ S i ” Y wat . are A a eee ee TPP ete OS OL. wrk \ — os VOSSASVSVVEVMS Savy sSNSVSSSRRIDAV SASS SED OL {3 i iN . - 3 PFILA “a _* % aft -.— afoelt Sse oFigid Webhes sf ae tbe a7 cee ares we wld em oyie wee ae one ) a tS dh fl Ley - \y> -+ OTS AEBS 630 %, . -—g , 47 om 4, wy 77eC Tada oF i AZ ay é 3 ! a ‘ ; he \e~ mG orone / “ pony he i Nbr, fy erg! oF} et | she ssvsSsSSSSSSSISVM 3 : SWS SOS 4 4 ; $7 epi P by — fe . ‘ re - a Y —_ q proofs wabge wlbYo of 41/9 LA AOE ¢ ; : worn of od tv Fre Add ZA wt Ww 79" ’ CLLLIT SCLLIL GLAS is 0 | VAC ie operations by n’ 631 EXHIBIT D MONTGOME LAW OFFICES 804-807 NaRY, BARNETT, BROWN & READ ional Bank of Commerce Building Richard B. MontgNew Orleans 12, La. Walter M. Barnebmery Wood Brown ; Henry J. Read John Phelps Ham Peter H. Beer nond John Walker Rea Albert Mintz |, II National Labor ] October 31, 1957 820 Lowich Buil , ,. 2026 St. Charles@/4tions Board ing New Orleans, Lz +a Attention: Mr. . Re:7ox Dear Sirs: J. H. Rutter-Rex-Mfg. Co. ._ 15-CA-721 and 15-CA-723 Supplementing you the compan) the rate per hovour letter of October 24, we now hand You will note tls payroll as of April 17, 1954, reflecting on the left hand and the earnings for a 2-week period. it the payroll lists the operation number We are also side enclosing a reference to the individual mber for shirts and pants. Yours very truly, MONTGOMERY, BARNETT, BROWN nb & READ Encls. By /s/ Henry J. Read ’ HENRY J. READ 15th Region: Received, Nov. 1, 1957, Office, New Orleans 13, La., NLRB. —y 632 EXHIBIT E LAW OFFICES MONTGOMERY, BARNETT, BROWN & READ 804-807 National Bank of Commerce Building New Orleans 12, La. Richard B. Montgomery Walter M. Barnett Wood Brown Henry J. Read John Phelps Hammond Peter H. Beer John Walker Read, III | Albert Mintz November 7, 1957 Received, Nov. 12, 1957, 15th Regional Office, New Orleans 13, La., NLRB. National Labor Relations Board 15th Region ‘ 820 Lowich Building 2026 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, La. Re: J. H. Rutter-Rex-Mfg. Co. 15-CA-721 and 15-CA-723 Dear Sirs: As you know, we are handling the matter of complying with the decree of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in the subject cases. Our client has already complied with some of the provisions of the decree, and is presently engaged in bargaining with the representatives of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America. If any instance of a failure to fully comply _— 633 with the order is brought to your attention, we would appreciate your contacting us promptly so that such cor- rective measures as may be necessary can be immediately taken in order to assure full compliance with the decree. Yours very truly, MONTGOMERY, BARNETT, BROWN & READ By /s/ Henry J. Read HENRY J. READ nb 634 EXHIBIT F [SEAL] NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FIFTEENTH REGION 820 Lowich Building, 2026 St. Charles Avenue | New Orleans 13, Louisiana March 22, 1960 Night TUlane 8320 J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing | Company, Inc, Cases Nos. 15-CA-721 and 723 Henry J. Read, Esq. Montgomery, Barnett, Brown & Reed 804-807 National Bank of Commerce Bldg. New Orleans 12, Louisiana Dear Mr. Read: As you may know, the above-named cases have been assigned to the undersigned for the purpose of assisting the Company in complying with the Order of the Board as enforced by the Circuit Court. Our file indicates our last correspondence with you was in 1957, when in a September 11 letter you informed us notices were posted in the New Orleans plants of Rutter- Rex on September 10. It is presumed that notices were subsequently posted at the Franklinton plant. Will you please confirm the posting of these notices, An effort is being made to determine the back pay, if any, due the strikers referred to by the Board in its Order, To this end we are requesting that payroll records, so- cial security payment records, personnel records and re ports necessary to analyze the amounts of back pay due and the rights of employment of strikers be made avail- able to us for examination and copying. We currently have before us the names of some 470 individuals for whom determinations are to be made. While this appears to be a formidable undertaking, we trust that with your ? Telephone EXpress 241! 635 cooperation it will not be too burdensome upon the Employer. Will you please contact us at your earliest convenience in order that we may arrange a time and place for our examination. We are, we realize, in the position of having delayed action in this matter over a period of several years. Under these circumstances, it may seem inconsistent that we now urge that prompt attention be given to the request. How- ever, the delay to date has been in a large measure due to a shortage of personnel in this office. In order that we may bring your client into compliance with the decree of the Court as soon as possible, we ask that we hear from yeu within the next week. Your cooperation here will be sincerely appreciated. Very truly yours, /s/ John H. Immel, Jr. JOHN TH. IMMEL, JR. Compliance Examiner ——y 636 [fol. 1] BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FIFTEENTH REGION Cases Nos. 15-CA-721, 15-CA-723 In the Matter of: J. H. RUTTER-REX MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. and AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO Hearing Room T-6039, Federal Building (Loyola) 701 Loyola Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana Monday, November 13, 1962. Pursuant to notice, the above-entitled matter came on for hearing at 10:00 o’clock, A.M. BEFORE: OWSLEY VOSE, Trial Examiner. APPEARANCES: JOHN H. HECTOR, EDWARD A. CHAMPAGNE, and LOUIS A. FUSELIER T-6024, New Federal Building, 701 Loyola Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana, appearing on behalf of the General Counsel. RALPH JACKSON 1310 Oil and Gas Building, New Orleans, Louisiana, representing Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO. HENRY J. READ and PETER H. BEER 806 National Bank of Commerce Building, New Or- leans, Louisiana, representing the Respondent. ee [fol. 74] LOREN P. JONES, a witness called by and on behalf of the Generai Counsel, after first being duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: 637 DIRECT EXAMINATION Q. (By Mr. Champagne) Would you state your name for the record, please? A. Loren P. Jones. Q. By whom are you employed, Mr. Jones? A. National Labor Relations Board. (fol. 75] Q. And that address is what? A. 6024 Federal Building, 701 Loyola Avenue. Q. In what capacity are you employed by the Labor Board? A. Compliance Officer. Q. Speak up just a little bit. A. Compliance officer. Q. How long have you been in that job? A. Approximately two and a half years. Q. How long have you been with the Board? A. About nine years. Q. Prior to being compliance officer, what type of work id you do? A. I was a field examiner. Q. With the Fifteenth Region? A. Fifteenth Region. That’s this region. Q. Prior to coming with the Board what type of work did you do? Who were you with? A. I was with the Wage and Hour Division, U. S$. Department of Labor. Q. What type of work did this entail? A. I was a wage and hour investigator. Q. And this went into payroll records and such of em- ployers and job classifications? A. Yes, sir. Q. Prior to that by whom were you employed? A. R. G. LeTourneau, Incorporated. (fol. 76] Q. What type of work did you do with them? A. Time study engineer. d Be Bh a) 638 Q. Time study engineer. This time that you have been compliance officer, this two and a half years, has this been continuous? A. Yes, sir. Q. Would you explain your duties as a compliance of- ficer. A. The duties are somewhat what the title entails, but after a board order is handed down and intermediate re port is handed down, after a settlement agreement has been arrived at, or after a court decree issues, it is my job to check that order or that document to determine what the respondent must do to comply with the order, and to more or less see that it is done. If it involves back pay, it is my job to compute the back pay due. If it involves the posting of notices, it is my job to see the notices are posted. That is generally what the job is. In a case such as this, if specifications are issued, it is part of my job to prepare those, too. Q. Asa field examiner, did you engage in the computa- tion of back pay also? . Yes, Q. All right, sir. Were you responsible for, or did you have any connection with the back pay specifications in this particular case? A. Yes, it is under my direction they were prepared. (fol. 77] Q. When were you assigned this case? A. I was assigned this case along with all other cases on compliance when I became compliance officer in mid- 1960. Q. When was that? A. Mid-1960. I believe June, but it was mid-year anyhow. Q. Now, were you assigned to this case by yourself? A. Initially, yes, but some few months after I had the case there was assigned an attorney full time to help in the legal matters and investigation and preparation of the specification. In other words, we two worked together on it then for a considerable length of time. In fact, there has been an attorney assigned to it ever since that time. Q. Since a short time after you got the case? x 4 24 Z 4 hye ee is % ty » ws ” y, : 2 4 — 639 A. I think that was probably October or November, 1960. I might mention there has been heavens only knows how many clericals assigned to it from time to time and possibly even an occasional professional sporadically to interview someone or assist there, but it has been primar- ily a two-man job with clerical assistance, . When you refer to the “professionals”, you are re- ferring to the field examiners and attorneys of the re- gional office, is that right? A. Right. There were occasions when we would bor- row one for a short time. Were you assigned any other help as far as proving [fol. 78] the computations or talking it over with anyone? A. Yes, my own superior, who is Assistant Regional Director and regional attorney, and at times Regional Di- rector. There have been many conferences held by the group with some of those people or some parts of those people about the methods or the law involved or various aspects of the case—most important aspects of the case, I might say. Q. Now, was anyone else from an office other than the regional office consulted in this matter? A. We once had a fellow down here from Washington. One fellow was here a matter of a few days to go over the anticipated method of computing the gross and then we later had another man down here for another couple of weeks to help compute some of these work sheets which you see back in the index section of the specification. (fol. 132] CROSS EXAMINATION Q. (BY MR. READ) Mr. Jones, I understood you to say yesterday that this case was turned over to you some- time in Mid-June, 1960. A. Yes, sir. Q. I said mid-June. I meant to say mid-year. Which is correct? A. Likely it was in June of 1960 as my recollection is. Q. Now, did the job of compliance officer exist before you were appointed compliance officer? A. Yes, sir. 7 Q. Who held the job prior to you? A. Mr. John Immel. Q. What was the state of Board file in the case when it was turned over to you? A. Well, there were several statements in there from various employees of Rutter-Rex. There were, oh, I think possibly 100 to 150 forms which had been filled out by employees of Rutter-Rex. There were several sheets of payroll transcriptions, I guess would be a good word, that Mr. Immel had made from company records. There were many, many documents of correspondence between our of- fice and employees of Rutter-Rex. There were some con- siderable documents that you folks had submitted, and (fol. 133] there were documents that the Union had sub- mitted in support of the various positions. That is about my recollection of what there was in the file. Q. Did that file contain a copy of my letter to the Board dated November, 1957 in which I included this language— MR. CHAMPAGNE: Mr. Examiner, we are going to object to this. I believe the purpose of Mr. Jones’ testi- mony, and the whole purpose, is limited to the computa- tion of the back pay and not to any delays or other reasons that might be gone into, I believe that this is what it was limited to. TRIAL EXAMINER: I will hear Mr. Read. MR, READ: Mr. Examiner, this witness has testified as a Board professional. He has testified as compliance officer, and he has testified at length as to what the duties of the compliance officer are. This letter that I am re- ferring to now is referred to as a predicate for a question as to the function of a compliance officer. I am interested in developing just what his function is and whether he fulfilled it or did not fulfill it in this case. TRIAL EXAMINER: He may answer it. MR. READ: I think the objection was interposed be- fore I quote to you the language which I am interested in. - (BY MR.READ) The language of my letter is as (fol. 134] follows: “If any instance of a failure to fully comply with the order is brought to your attention we 640 So eee 9 i 641 would appreciate your contacting us promptly so that such corrective measures as may be necessary can be immedi- ately taken in order to assure full compliance with the Do you recall whether the letter containing that lan- guage was in the files when it was turned over to you? A. I believe so. Yes, sir. The date I wouldn’t know. I remember a letter of that general content. Now, does the work of a compliance officer involve efforts to work with respondent companies the details of compliance short of litigation? A. Frequently they do. Q. Do you know whether any effort had been made by your predecessor to work out the details of compliance with this company prior to the time that you took over the case? A. No, I don’t know of any. I don’t know that there was or there wasn’t in other words. Q. Did you during the time the case has been under your jurisdiction respond in any way to that letter to which I have referred? A. No, sir. Q. Did you make any effort to present to the company the Board’s contentions and attempt to work out with the company a solution of the problems arising therefrom? {fol. 135] A. Well, there was a letter we sent to you in September which— Q. Of what year? A. Of 1961, soliciting your position. I remember that. Now, whether ti.at is in the purview of what you are talking about I am not sure, but I do recall there was such a letter sent to you. Q. Right. I remember the letter you refer to also. A. It was for your position. Q. Did we reply to that letter? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did we not state our position? A. Yes, sir. Q. And did we not conclude our letter of October 27th with this language: “the writer will be pleased to discuss these matters further with you at our mutual conveni- ence,”’ 642 Do you remember that? A. Yes, sir. Q. Did you make any attempt to work out the prob- lems which the Board saw in this case before you filed the back pay specification? A. No, sir. No, Before the filing of the specification you say? Q. Before, that’s correct. A. No. sir, except I might say this. The timing I am fol. 136 not sure about. I do recollect we talked one time about reinstating these 70 people. If that was before the specification— Q. It may have been after? A. It may have been after. I know we did after. The only question in my mind is whether we also did before. Q. But as far as you recollect specifically you cannot refer to any specific instance in which an attempt was made to work out these problems before you filed the back pay specification? A. No, sir. * * * * Q. I’m asking you whether as a compliance officer do you consider that your duties included an effort to work [fol. 187] out these matters with the Respondent before you litigated the case? A. Qh, yes. Q. Why didn’t you do it? A. Well, we had sent a letter asking the position on these people here. Now, that was the first time in my time as compliance officer and presumably the first time anybody was in a position to know the status of this case. Now, normally the employer at that point, we usually get some response from him at that point, to try to work these things out. This was an advice to you folks asking for a position, but at the same time setting out our posi- tion. Most certainly this September letter is—is it Sep- tember, by the way? Q. You are talking now about the statement of the employer’s position in October of 1961. A. If that is the date on it, yes. Q. All right. Now, we will take that date. ERT LES ESE TEE IG ILE ESM RE TRS OR ee ae ae RE vad on EE SSE SIT CRESS EN 7 — = ae —s 643 A. Yes, sir. We will take that as a starting point. Did you make any attempt to discuss with the employer or any or his representatives the obligations which the Board saw in the decree as enforced before you filed the specification? A. No, sir. I understood you to say that your duties as com- pliance officer included an effort so to do, and I now ask you why you did not do so in this case? (fol. 138] A. I believe I went one step further, Mr. Read, and said that the employer or the Respondent nor- mally indicates some desire of wanting some help or advice or whatever term you might like to use in this. At the time that we came to this thing in October obviously you had made a request but it was what, some four years prior. I had no indication from then on that you folks wanted to work this case out or try to comply or anything else. I had no indication one way or the other. Q. You never asked us. A. No, sir. Absolutely not, sir. I sent you only a let- ter of position. Q. And you did know we had in the file which was turned over to you a request that the Board bring to the attention of the company any instance in which the Board considered a failure of compliance to have occurred. You knew that was in the file? A. That’s correct. * * * * (fol. 162] Q. Do you have a copy of your questionnaire with you? A. I don’t have it up here. Q. Do you have the forms with you? A. There are some around in the hearing room here I think. . Could I see one please? MR. CHAMPAGNE: Mr. Examiner, we are going to object to the production of this. This is just a work- sheet sort of thing, and after all, interini earnings as such are some thing that we are conceding on behalf of the employees as to deduction of back pay. I don’t think ) his work product is submittable. LH ERE SP BBN MII NIE OE PLETE I DE 644 TRIAL EXAMINER: I think for the purposes of this — hearing it would be helpful for him to see a blank form © and if you don’t have a blank form I don’t think the in- formation on any individual is going to prejudice your case, if he sees it. MR. FUSELIER: Let the record reflect that I am showing to Mr. Read a form entitled “Rutter-Rex Manu- facturing Company,” consisting of four mimeographed pages with questions and blanks and one blank page for — notes and computations. TRIAL EXAMINER: Well, that isn’t the back pay form to which you were referring. THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. (fol. 163] TRIAL EXAMINER: That has been used around the office for years? THE WITNESS: No. This is the one that was de- veloped for use in the Rutter-Rex case only, as the title implies. TRIAL EXAMINER: You didn’t use any of the standard forms in the Rutter-Rex case? THE WITNESS: Yes, we used some of those too. Certainly did. Certainly did. Q. (BY MR. READ) I would like to see the differ- ence vetween the two. Do you have any of your standard forms? A. I presume there are some around the office. It is an obsolete form. I might mention that it has now be- come obsoiete. TRIAL EXAMINER: Since it was used in this case? THE WITNESS: Yes. TRIAL EXAMINER: I would appreciate your fur- nishing it. MR, CHAMPAGNE: Would you care to see one while we are waiting? TRIAL EXAMINER: Yes, : MR. HECTOR: May the record reflect I am ‘handing to Mr. Read a form identified as NLRB Form 916. Inci- dentally, this is an obsolete form. TRIAL EXAMINER: But it was used in connection with the back pay computation? MR. HECTOR: Yes, sir. pi ae ae I ord AT A or as ti 645 TRIAL EXAMINER: Computation work in this case in part? (fol. 164] MR. HECTOR: In part, yes, sir. MR. CHAMPAGNE: I know you are familiar with this, but you might want to see it. MR. READ: Mr. Hector, Mr. Fuselier, did you mark either one of those forms for identification in any way other than stating for the record you were handing them BMS SA PRE Nt NET AEE EG LM EELS MESES ONAL RII to me? MR. FUSELIER: Not at this time. MR. READ: I would like to mark the first form en- titled Rutter-P2x Manufacturing Company, as Rutter- Rex No. 1. % ~vould like to mark the second one Rutter- Rex Form No. 2. (Thereupon, the documents above referred to were marked Respondent’s Exhibit R-1 and R-2 for identi- fication. ) MR. CHAMPAGNE: May I suggest he mark it R-1? MR. READ: Yes, mark it R-1, then, because there will propably be a number of them. * * * * MR. READ: I offer the two documents so marked into evidence in connection with the testimony of Mr. Jones. MR. CHAMPAGNE: I won’t object to it. TRIAL EXAMINER: Received. (Thereupon, the documents heretofore marked R-1 (fol. 165] and R-2 for identification, were received in evi- dence. ) MR. READ: Might I inquire whether you have addi- tional copies that you could make available to me, be- | cause those will be for the record. | MR. HECTOR: For the record we will make available 1 an extra copy. _ (BY MR. READ) Did you devise this form which is marked R-1? | , A. I believe Mr. Cohen an’ I together devised that orm. Q. That was in 19— what? A. Probably the fall of 1960. CT UP URS LOBEL OE A a De maytag Nr _ . . PLP DS YAS TON SoS bie RR Re Otis ts - > ~~ » SS te SaaS Li SS el aL 646 Q. The fall of 1960? A. Yes. Maybe early 1961, but in that period. Q. Were you given any completed forms on the old ~ form when you took over the case? | A. There were some of those in the file. Q. There were? A. There were some of these in the file. Q. Do you remember how many? A. My recollection is that there was an excess of 100 but I don’t think as many as 200. I would say someplace between 100 and 200. Q. So you had approximately 100 of these forms, form No. 2, completed and in the file when you took over the © case? : (fol. 166) A. Yes. i Q. Is that correct? A. I would say in the neighborhood of 100 to 200, in | that territory, yes. I might mention by way of explana- tion I don’t know that all of those ended up in the specifi- cations, * * * * (fol. 168} Q. (BY MR. READ) Did you tell them in any instance? A. We may have told them. To start with, there are certain things. The first question asked might well elimi- nate them from the case entirely. Those people were told nothing except “So long”. That’s what those people were told. Q. I’m talking about— A. Now, the other people that you went ahead and in- terviewed at length, they were probably told something along these lines. Q. Now I am not asking whether they were probably told. I am asking whether you know whether they were told the purpose of your interview with them was to deter- mine their right to back pay in this proceedings? A. I might have told them something to that effect, yes, sir. (fol. 169] Q. You did tell them, did you not? A. To help determine if they were entitled to rein- statement and/or back pay. ‘ - a a sganten caoeqenntig. PPLE REE LISLE INTE SEE PRT SOLE EI TILING EI LSS LEE IE ENE OT OCT 647 aaa _ But you don’t mean to tell me you might have told them. You did tell them. A. Some of them I did tell. I don’t have any doubt. . You don’t have any doubt. MR. CHAMPAGNE: Mr. Examiner, we are arguing and that has no place in this record. Now, I think Mr. Jones has the right * * * e * * * [fol. 220] REDIRECT EXAMINATION Q. (By Mr. Champagne) ted is ,. CRA RAS eee TESOL AR OES: Cie ees wot Us yats [fol. 227] Q. You have mentioned several times in your testimony that a calculation of this back pay involved the interviewing of 500 or 600 people; is that correct? oe A. Yes, sir. _ And that, I understand, was finally narrowed down to 200 and— A. Seven. _ * * * Q. Could you give us any breakdown of the reasons for the elimination of some 200 or 300 people who, as I under- stand it, there are around 400 people on strike, 400 or 500; can you give us any kind of a statement of the rea- sons for elimination of these some two or three hundred people? A. I can give you several of the reasons. I can’t give you any idea of how many within a given reason. I know (fol. 228] I can recollect several reasons why we disquali- fied them, one being no application at all; in other words, no evidence they tried to go back to work. Q. Did you endeavor to go out and look for these peo- ple who did not make any application? % A. We contacted these people, either in person, by let- ter or by phone. We contacted these people. 5 Q. And what did you do then? A. We specifically asked about that point. Q. About whether or not they would make an applica- tion? A. Whether they had. Whether they had made an application. If they did not, according to this decree we A GMOE SE GUT RIES ee . —_ = PALO EMEA EB IO PE. OUI IE MCLE SVEN EN Gigs SILI GLY EBL! LEM - Zz do not see that they could by any stretch of imagination be included in such a thing as this. Q. You mean people who did not make an application for reemployment? A. Correct, or who the union had not made applica. tion for, one of the two, Q. Could you estimate about how many that elimi- — nated? A. No, I really can’t. Q. What were the other reasons for elimination? A. There were some eliminated because the company had reinstated them within five days as required by the decree and they consequently would be entitled to nothing. Some were eliminated on that basis. I am trying to see (fol. 229) if there might be any other reasons. That is the main ones that I recall. Q. Were there any that you know of who had made application for reemployment but who had moved away and you simply couldn’t contact? A. We may have had a few that we didn’t find and didn’t know what the status was. I don’t recollect that there were many like that. You are talking now of peo ple that are not in the specifications, correct? Q. Yes. A. There may be some in that category. (fol. 399] PHILIP LAMPERT, a witness called by and on behalf of the General Counsel, being first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q. (By Mr. Hector) Would you please state your name and address for the record. A. Philip Lampert, L-a-m-p-e-r-t, 333 South Ashland Boulevard, Chicago 7, Illinois. | Q. Mr. Lampert, by whom are you employed? A. The Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America. Q. In what capacity, sir? A. Regional counsel. ——— 649 Q. How long have you held that position? A. 16 years. _ Were you regional counsel at the time of the strike in 1954-1955 at Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company in New Orleans? (fol.400] A. I was, Q. Did you have anything to do with the union’s posi- tion with that strike? A. I did. Q. In what capacity were you connected with it? A. Iwas here in an advisory capacity. Q. Mr. Lampert, I am handing to you what has been marked for identification as General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 8, a letter dated April 5, 1955, signed by you and attached return receipt. Can you identify that for me, sir? (Thereupon, the document above referred to was marked General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 8 for identi- fication. ) A. Yes,Ican. This is a letter which I wrote on April 5, 1955 and sent by registered mail to the Respondent com- pany informing them that our organization, the Amalga- mated Clothing Workers of America, had voted on March 31 to terminate a strike then current against the Respond- ent company, and also informed them that the employees whose names were on an attached list wished to return to work unconditionally and immediately and a request that the company inform us as to where and when those em- ployees should return to work. Q. And is that the return receipt, or do you have any knowledge as to whether or not that was the return re- ceipt attached to that letter? (fol.401] A. Yes. I have personal knowledge that that is the return receipt. MR. READ: May I see that. MR. HECTOR: At this time I would offer General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 8 in evidence. MR. JACKSON: What is the number of it? MR. HECTOR: 8. TRIAL EXAMINER: Received. — LITLE I LEE ASPIRE ES EON Pry et ~ 650 (The document heretofore marked General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 8 for identification was received in evi- dence. ) Q. (By Mr. Hector) Mr. Lampert, I show to you what I have marked for identification as General Counsel’s Exhibit 9. It is a letter dated April 8th with your name typed on as the originator and a return receipt attached. Can you identify that for me? (Thereupon, the document above referred to was marked General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 9 for identi- fication. ) A. This is a letter which I wrote on April 8, 1955, to the Respondent company and sent to them by registered mail, in which I informed them that this is an additional list of employees who wished to return for work, wished to return to work with the company unconditionally and immediately, and again a request that the company inform (fol. 402) us when and where the employees should return to work, Q. And do you have any knowledge as to the return receipt attached thereto? A. Yes, I do. Q. It was attached to that letter at the time you sent it? A. It was. Q. At this time I would like— A. It wasn’t attached to the letter at the time it was sent. It was returned as a result of sending that letter and was incorporated in our files. MR. HECTOR: At this time I would like to offer in evidence General Counsel’s Exhibit 9. TRIAL EXAMINER: Received. (The document heretofore marked General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 9 for identification was received in evi- dence. ) TRIAL EXAMINER: Do you have copies of those that I could just look at? MR. HECTOR: Yes, sir. TRIAL EXAMINER: I don’t want to keep them. 651 Q. (By Mr. Hector) Mr. Lampert, I show you an exhibit I have marked for identification as Genera] Coun- sel’s Exhibit No. 10, a letter addressed to you from Mr. A. H. Dennis of the Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company, and ask you if you can identify that further for us. (fol. 403) A. This is a letter which I received fro:1 Mr. Dennis, who is an officer of the Respondent company, on April 11, 1955, acknowledging receipt of my letters as indicated here April 4th, but which actually carries the date of April 5, which is General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 8, and the letter of April 8th, and suggested that the persons who desired to return to work file application with the Respondent’s personnel office and requested that we send these applicants in groups of 20 per day. (Thereupon, the document above referred to was marked General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 10 for identi- fication. ) MR. HECTOR: At this time I would like to offer in evidence General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 10. MR. READ: What is the date on that letter? MR. HECTOR: April 11, 1955. MR. READ: No objection. TRIAL EXAMINER: Received. (The document heretofore marked General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 10 for identification was received in evi- dence. ) Q. (By Mr. Hector) Mr. Lampert, I show to you what I have marked for identification as General Coun- sel’s Exhibit No. 11, a letter dated April 22, 1955, copy bearing your name as the originator, and a return receipt (fol. 404| attached. Can you identify that for me? A. This is a letter which I sent on April 22, 1955 by registered mail to the Respondent company. MR. READ: What date, Mr. Lampert? MR. JACKSON: April 22. THE WITNESS: April 22, 1955, in which I informed the company that though we were sending employees to the Respondent’s personnel office at the rate of 20 per day as the company had requested, that we considered the EEL LLOOMED! (SEIS BI ICW NGS ON AO Bi sone OY PES y 652 employees as having unconditionally applied for employ ment on the date that the company was in receipt of ou registered letters, and in addition thereto submitted a additional list of employees who wished to return to wor unconditionally and immediately. (Thereupon, the document above referred to wa marked General Counsel’s Exhibit No. 11 for ident: fication. ) Q. (By Mr. Hector) Do you have any knowledg with regard to the attached return receipt? A. Yes, I do. Q. What knowledge do you have with regard to it? A. That return receipt came to our office, and | pe sonally put it in our files. MR. HECTOR: I would like to offer into evidence General Counsel’s Exhibit No, 11. TRIAL EXAMINER: Received. {fol.405| (The document heretofore marked Gener: Counsel’s Exhibit No, 11 for identification was rn ceived in evidence.) Q. (By Mr. Hector) I now show you what I hav identified as Generz] Counsel's Exhibit No, 12, a lette dated May 13, 1955 with your name typed apparently : the originator and an attached return receipt. Can yo identify that further for us? A. That is a letter which I sent on May 13 to the Ri spondent Company which included a list of additional en ployees who were offered to return to work for the con pany unconditionally and immediately. (Thereupon, the document above referred to w: marked General Counsel's Exhibit No. 12 for ident fication. ) Q. Do you have any knowledge as to the return receij attached thereto? A. Ido. I personally put that in our files. MR. HECTOR: At this time 1 would like to offer i evidence General Counsel's Exhibit No. 12. 000 AIRED 653 TRIAL EXAMINER: Received. (The document heretofore marked General Counsel's Exhibit No. 12 for identification was received in evi- dence. ) (fol. 2512) BESSIE COOPER LEE a witness called by and on behalf of the General Counsel, being first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: CROSS-EXAMINATION TRIAL EXAMINER: I’m not sure you understand this whole procedure. The Labor Board discourages em- ployers from interviewing witnesses. I am assuming that this is the company’s first contact with the witness. Any application could only be produced through her. MR. GRAHAM: No, that’s my point. It is possible that the company has procured these written applications at the places where they were made? TRIAL EXAMINER: It seems fantastic that an em- ployer with as big a job as this employer has got would be able to comb all the possible places of employment and secure copies of applications which were filed 8 years be fore. 1 just don’t understand the basis for your objection. (fol. 4278} J. J. HOOLEY was called as a witness by and on behalf of Respondent, and having been duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q. (By Mr. Read) Would you state your name, please? A. J. J. Hooley, H-o-o-l-e-y. Q. What is your business, Mr. Hooley? A. Insurance claim adjuster. Q. What is the name of the company with which you are affiliated? A. J. J. Hooley claims service. Q. Is that here in New Orleans? 654 A. 318 Carondelet Street, room 407. Q. Your company is in the business of conducting in. vestigations and adjusting insurance claims? A. That is correct. That is the business. Q. Mr. Hooley, did you at my request contact various garment manufacturers in the city of New Orleans in an effort to determine what records these companies had a this time, indicating the names of persons who may have ~ applied at the individual companies for employment be — tween the years 1955 and 1961? e A. Yes, I did. a tn cananabant re ie AICO [fol. 4281] Q. (By Mr. Read) Mr. Hooley, directing — your attention to Schram Brothers, did you go to the office of Schram Brothers? 3 A. Yes. BY Q. And did you ask them whether they kept records of [fol. 4282] the applications submitted to them by such per- sons as applied for employment there between the years 1955 and 1961? A. Yes. Q. What did they tell you? Be A. Well, at that time, they were in the process of liquidating. They had a box of records which they were — in the process of throwing away. I would say the box was three and a half by four feet square, and about four feet deep, and that is the box they gave me, that high, of all records all mixed up. I brought those back to my office by a dolly and had my office go through them one by one, and put them altogether because they were all mixed up. ~ * + * * [fol. 4286] Q. (By Mr. Read) Now, moving on toa © company by the name of B. Bennett, would you tell us _— whether you visited that company for the same purpose, — and also tell us what information you obtained? A. Yes, sir, I visited the Bennett company. Q. What date did you go there? A. Ihave it. I can tell you the exact date. April 18. Q. Will you tell us what you found? a 655 A. Well, I spoke to Mr. Dorsan who is in charge of the plant. And he does not take regular written applica- tions. He keeps them, the names of applicants in a ledger book. It is more or less like a time book, and he only takes down those names, as I understand it, that he either employs or may employ. That is just a record for his own use. The office has nothing to do with it. Q. Did he give you these ledger books for any period? A Yes, he gave me three different ledger books, one covered a period of January, 1953 to 4-10-53. Then the next book was from 4-6-61 through 4-24-61 and then had some 1962 notations which you are not interested in, and the third book was from 3-14-56 to 7-21-58. I might add these were the only books that he could locate or had as far as he told me. He really only kept the current one, [fol. 4287] but he found these other 2 books. * * * * (fol. 4288] Q. Were you shown any other records at B. Bennets from which a determination could be made as to whether any of the names on the list that I gave you had applied for employment at that company? (fol. 4289] A. No, sir. Q. I turn your attention now to Famous-Sternberg, and ask you if you visited that company for the same pur- pose, and if so, what the result of your investigation showed? A. Yes, sir, I did, and I ascertained that while they do take regular applications, if the applicants are not employed, the applications are destroyed withi a year period. Q. Well, then, do I understand from that that Famous Sternberg advised you that they had no applications for the period 1955 to 1961? A. They had none from my recollection for my perusal. Q. Turning now to American Manufacturing Com- pany, please tell us what your investigation revealed at that plant? : A. I determined that while they take regular applica- tions, the said applications are destroyed in less than a year, and therefore there were no applications for me to review. a. Q. Next, I direct your attention to Murphey’s Whole sale Tailors, and ask you what your investigations showed at that plant? A. They do not take or keep applications for employ- ment. Q. In other words, even at the time that they inter. view someone for employment, they don’t take formal ap- plications? A. No, sir, he says the owner Says he took scribble memorandums and threw them away when he didn’t em- ploy them immediately, Q. All right. Next, I ask you about Foster Company. (fol. 4290] TRIAL EXAMINER: Is this the awning company? THE WITNESS: Yes. They do take regular applica- tions but when the parties are not immediately employed or within a reasonable or very short period, the applica- tions are destroyed or thrown away within the year, and there were none available for my inspection. Q. (By Mr. Read) I direct your attention to Seg- Mar, Inc. and ask what your investigation revealed at that plant? A. The only folder of application they had were from 2-26-55 to 3-6-55, which was a response to an ad. Q. We are not interested in that. That is earlier than the period that I am really interested in. A. They had no other applications for my perusal, and I was advised that all other applications had since been thrown away and they do not retain for any long period. Q. You were told that there were none for the period in which you were interested? A. That is correct. Q. What about Southern Tailoring Company? A. They do not take regular applications and there- fore they had none for any period. Q. What about Comus Manufacturing Company? A. They do not take written applications, and there- fore did not have any. Q. What about A. Solomon and Company? [foi.4291] A. They were in liquidation and several mor ths before I made contact with them they had thrown 656 igh Sx MAAS Ae Pe? RR ET EY pikvea aie vm SR a oe Mone . SARE SEE ER GHEE RE EERO LEO MEE ERTIES ee E_ 657 away or destroyed all of the old records including appli- cations for employment, so they had none for my perusal. Q. Do you know the date on which you contacted A. Solomon? A. Yes, on April 15, sir. . This year? A. 1963. Q. Tell me what you investigation revealed at Haspel Bros. Inc.? A. I determined that while they take written applica- tions, if they do not employ the parties, they destroy them in 6 months or less and they were not available for my rusal. Q. What about Louisiana Garment Manufacturing Company? A. They do not take written applications. I beg your pardon. They do take written application but when they do not employ the applicants they are destroyed within the year, and the only applications they had on hand at this place was for 1962. Q. Pelican Manufacturing Company? A. Do not take written applications at all and had none on hand. Q. What about Southern Manhattan Company? I am sorry. I think we have covered that. I am wrong in that name, I withdraw that question. What about J. 4. Bonck, Inc.? A. I was first advised by Mr. Shaak, S-h-a-a-k, they (fol. 4292] pronounce it shark, that they did not keep applications over two months when they did not hire the parties, but just as I was leaving the personnel manager, Mrs. Gagnard, G-a-g-n-a-r-d, stated that they had some applications apparently unknown to Mr. Shaak which however, in the majority of about 50 percent thereof in- volved high school applicants, and so on, and also— Q. You mean for summer work? A. Summer work, and also she stated that what appli- cations they did have on hand were for the year 1962, and not beyond 1961. Q. So they would have nothing for you to examine for this period that we are interested in? RES EEO E EL IY LL ET LIS IIE WME TINO MIB IONE AONE DS LLM TE IEE AEREL ER OE MER LNTEIS Big + 3 A. No, sir. Q. Now, all of these visits to these companies were made by you in the months of April and May of 1963? A. I could give you the exact dates, Q. I don’t want the exact dates. A. April and May of this year. That is correct. Q. And other than the records that you have told us about you were advised that no other records were avail- able at the various companies? A. That is correct, sir. MR. READ: That is all I have. No further questions. MR. JACKSON: No questions. TRIAL EXAMINER: Do all parties consent to the (fol. 4293] receipt in evidence of Mr. Hooley’s testimony. eSE7~” 1) wiers-42160 (1-96) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO — FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION | DATE OF BIRTH lead SECURITY NUMBER oa. ANG PLUM Cite L -_AGANE YES Be Cots 0 NUMBER TRB CASE NAME AN J. He Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. Inc. 15-CA-721 & 723 oe Yivision of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration ‘andler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers' addresses, and my corresponding earnings. eee | LZ eo” Lusty Oa ii (DO WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) TO THE si i SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD ‘ / { FROM TS) To tipi ke 7 oe ail RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER f.t. NUMBER Le aight gest Ma # ‘.* toys ey ww. t 7a: 9lss~ Atiooese OP OPT ee F 24 4¢¢122 yalss ge te etey sf ik ale Ji- 1707 e683 2 ot in . i piv thn re hs 4 fal a Go’ Erplogh. 7 “my |Z . a. jhied Abid. FOR y f 5. 6. : 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. > aueo tet — ° aeree Fe Sat REGionAL OFFICE aporess: AAT oS ia Fie te pw bee bs bass wip 620 bers sits 2020 St. Charies Avenue NEW ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA, =) Bigg /0-3/-67 669 -_— —~ (or AUTHORIZA,10N TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMAT!ON — | OATE OF BIRTH ee SECURITY NUMBER 433-032-7755 Form wiae-4160 (156) Werit DA DELPLT uve wine CASE wAME AND NU eer r-Rex Mi oo = and 723° Division of Accounting Operations * social Security Administration + candler Building +) paltinore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ adiresses, and my corresponding earnings. i sour ¥ pritbaldr 19.slpst (D0 HOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) S rp) THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD and iles To PeEERT RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS : NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER E.1. NUMBER be rail wl sg be 20 -06F7- 009% ne Gh7| 62.2° . 0/47 80 % /4¢, 00 Fives?) foods tive. - = 2» 8627 Cows Sh ih Wew OkRbkeagws $ Ly. 3. . as R C2 98950 £ SH, Kutter - Ker (y~FG. Ce Ze. Ds. 3726 Druphwe ST New Onleews, Ld. 6. -. a4- C8 F- coon In- 407.€0 4 ?, hep - 2 4 t Finds! eno 0F209$/ 1G) 14.3% D Brenna: French + CReke ResT PHes PaQwen EC. y Owew PF Berenwan?s 24 Zoun how SE eae New Crhewns , Aes. 4 Laur “adie She - butts peHite pi10€ + Soh Caawdors lel - a Soves 7. Ais Lk, Lag C27 GU 99 T/, FO 5 Za 1¥4.0° “i 4 ‘/ Ve “e fo 3g 370° / t/ 46, athe _ ‘ _fe-oui-e AE Y, G-0° . RELATIONS BOARY HEIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: FIFTEENTH REGH™ 820 Lowich Building 20% St. Charles Avenue NEW ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA 670 +e oe priuak taabush Bete oe : . ——— Ay =r —S> 18-1226 - 6 , s . = a Ld nae ; Baenn as FReuck + Cre R P " Z24/ Do un fe ST seis oof Weuw Onkeans , ad. 19. ; ap -wlt- 2a0F 20. Waterbureys Druds we. 7e- 540 Causk °St 0297320 New Orteans ,» hes. ai. 22. ‘ : o- (olf > 000% ss X75) 23. 00v: oF Assoc. ete Baby Se Tee 7a 9% 7 New Cepeans ava ders: 0 ¢7 4° 2201 +ulLerve Ave. 7.) New Calews | Ad. 25. Zo JOR - PRES 0.00 ° 26 DR. 4itred Y Gentine > > . Zos Cavey, SF 0366959 Mew Onkhesns , Aa. 27. 28. BF. paves Gaemev? Ce, Jwe: ae / 265,56 2%. Jooo 2 Roy sl ST. : o~ Be| 3 5 New Cereaus Jit, eas ‘ Cx 7677 , a Zz AS3. 93 eo " | 479,07 : . 7 239.08 31. e, Ks 74, 2% P ¥ 434.69 32. “e f %8 | 364. z 67> 070? - ool “ hey | 206 72 33. - —— — T r= ——— 3 e i, Nene & Pe\s (7) eae ero 01 ieee '_ 671 ” \RANSCRIPT OF EARNINGS DATA f font. 2. Y33- 03- 2285 Employee Name Bath ilda. Lo ehjol__ IDENTIFICATION WAGES AND ADDRESSES OF EMPLOYERS NUMBER PERIOD | peporrep | COMMENTS watt Co: awe, For Ky 9.00 (3-006§ - 000] sgzive aT Cons mon 3%. : Orkewvs, Aa. ele 9440 Tb. Ptassow + ‘THe TiVER 7n- %> ey. go | ¢$-0507-200! ] House a | ences 4 672 FORM NL RB-4180 sig AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO _— FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION : AME (Print) | DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY women SHIRLEY M. EDGERSON $35-38-7675 WLRO CASE NAME AND NUMBER SS J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co., Inc., 15=CA-721 & 723 Division of Accounting Operations fe. nee "; Social Security Administration ies Vale 5 , Candler Building -- -- —_ fates ater? ae) 5 23 H \ Baltimore 2, Maryland 2 1% ©. 4 Z BLE: RD ten i Dear Sirs: 2. NEW pet: Sebi etic t . 3 Please list below nd forward to the National Labor Relations ‘Board at the ‘address. shown a on » the. bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my —_— of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. --. --- - - = (00 HOT WRITE BELOW THIS LiWwE) ~ TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM January 1, 1955 To present RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS NAME AND ADORESS OF EMPLOYER E. 1. NUMBER ba ips hl a ted oO al le £ 0372506 | 5s SLE 2% 7) te — oem : sl g-s>- A 90-20 BSS IL487 . 3 HB PB G tes DL. -| 72 em. oe OS V/SY | 6-5 > 22 40g 19-1 : Plea C)hkedpe og. so 955 Al. 00 4 F: tipi: WOVE ; ¥ ; = 6-56 2 Sanne rf Boy TL G56 Af. 78 10m Mi > Aly Dotan sonnel LL20 420 7. | ae De depmrar bedlétinn Pod 8. fitie . = i 5 aa GLI Ck“ 42-5 L463 : 32-57 $02.37 ; ie 622 LE52 10. Beanfemen 7 Brower Ti G-57 VOWE is. 17ese hniafh Lf. , : a 4 Pr oe re oD LY4ABW2\| 2-2 AU.00 Ws 7 3-58 290.00 * = ie Ad -SS SI6.00 G-455 290.00 13 ty ‘¢ er bn i SA -2§ 370.00 REGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: aaareva WiRaeE. ee $20 Low'eh Muttng Eee 2026 St. Care! venue Sf 7>-? NEW ORLEANS 15, LUGISIANA 2° as’ Be —_—_ 673 nawE AUD ADORESS OF EMPLOvER t.1. senoen pa ys BWA — or ba f emer 7 Knew SST | B90. oo iG VATr | eee || S¥0.20 — enact a tae : ase | ee, co: n 7 2-60 3é0-00 6-60 390.00 Ss yt 97- GO B79-00 Le2- G0 RlO-60 g AW Berne le Sate TA 037 (34¢ | 42-42 B50 24-/09 ool tam “/ Aiegm tele toda lle 72 0392506 | 42 60 £5.36 £o-l43t oor WKutir hex Pf fe se | 2 3-6/ 751IT ACS ta a arr a Za. |\Qtohash | b-b/ None ( Sed “ Uy AGS, 8x . - / 7.00 ~ por tusst 7 Wn 9 Me L dit: OVI 236 “ He 308.09 e 37-Wo0- 000} | 2 32.00 n. Bb. - } eae Y WAX a. > 4 Mar Ane, 6/¢ Ia-ga- 2397907 pre DS ates (ITIVE TL, el Jo. 2s. ~ grr pronessomey 19 EN Tne Webb voce? |... #2 Svrt NN me Sp ~~ ae g ron Pati] PF a> eo etteoe 676 Forum — -56) iis AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION “WAWE (Print) 2 7 E ~~~ Winnie Hae Vernandes a MLAS CASE MAME ANDO MUMBER JH. RutterRax Mfg. Co., Ine, 15-Che721 and 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Dear Sirs: c--- Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on tie bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. Signatubh. se. H7 a (D0 SOT WRITE BELOW THIS Line) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLAB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM April 1, 1955 To Present RECORD OF EXPLOYWENT AND EARNINGS AME AND ADORESS OF EwPLOvER €.'. wumeee ceasee of. cooeats. or 1. 27 e/ss 7 2- ft/s 15. 00 2. Fy are Cin BF 60 laJss5 roe Pam 3. [a >/ Camel Lt 3/s¢ 360.c/ hier Iphigne Ju: e/x¢ 473-26 . tse 257.50 5. l2foe | 348.60 r 3/5 - 365.50 mB. 35-1 Y g | oe 6/57 445.55 : gat Ew Pov an) 4 wd off - 039677 we a oab.,7d 0. Tyee Candy ts - “yrs “he sie un, AM BIO A. Ltn 4h, He. ¢Fe-) 12. ‘i COSTED ' Flaw ON IS QNTERLD APOE outJAL sELUAITY iN. PER oe ht 22 13. Regional orrice aponess: NATIONAL LAR™X RATIOS BUARD FIFTES WH “GION 820 Lov” “les Ave. a ee NEW Ow Ue Ae a0, ... InIANA 677 romw wLRe-4260 ls (1-56) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION Tat ee iin \F)29 7 >, \Wio- 32 - $093 CASE NAME AND mUMBER WHF OSE oweter-Rex Mfg. Co. Inc., 15-CA-721 and 723 —— Division of Accounting Operations © social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. Sipnarn Lita soate Uta Praachaach (DO MOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) To THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM SLAB: “Of SUPPLY THIS IWFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD TO nn 4, [SS (LENT RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AMO Eamnings aoo f PLOY PERIOD OF wounTs 0 NAWE AND MESS OF EMPLOYER f.'. wumece s ‘ OSS Vv4e.e Pace Ce. | CG YY ~ West WAN, Stage C2ICIIC G/KS Ab-70 ‘ se C2-OYSY¥ bof 06/2 5 Ae + nie STae eX VEZ (ORE > oa Cri euas 1 oe W35960 | (VEE | AIPPZ f cs “u Oleg [Sco 7 (1 B/SC 360-0 / Z C/S6b SIZ 70 : ae a ELL 257. Fo ; . Y fils PL3-bo ; 3 4 I/7 | 25 So i “ o/s? LIF FE ‘ od 7/57 SP¢,25 %. “ NATIONAL A809 POTIONS BOM A Sew aes ee aL ra HEGIONAL OFFICE ADORESS: 820 Lv.2> Delite 5 k U2 St. Chesies Aveeve Y 23 NaW ORLEANS 13, LOU.SL.264 £459 Bs “¢F oaniés or D-Grte canees envcovsest ~ Soe meme App pooness oF curores €, wit H, hum | a V35960 “ps7 | /j-#007 goer 2 Snacve 8 eonnoy op onan AW ° eee Hehe Stacer ICYSSIS/| YSGE Shaevepes® , bes, wl y ig 4 te b i ek id ad LA Pr- he BY Gws coamen aes, ae ¢ Wew~ On {eens ha 036 7677 ZX$4 27-453 sors Low GeAament AFE Ce Dic. Z.co: Tr. Behrend Kee. 72 : ey aay Sabs | WF New Cilemns, Le ul a 14/9 a 4 Wee \ 4 b/oe IS - f 7/5 00/a- m P/o 0° Beevn esed ronw wine-s260 AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO 679 ae (1-96) FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARMINGS INFORMATION Tit (Print) oate oF bt . SOCIAL SECURITY suMeER bess AN DEZ 13/2 Gg Let | Yio - 32-3093 aiae case 048 A 4 € ano nox hfe Seo on. ‘ 7) Division of accounting Operations Social Security Administration Dear Sirs: Please list below bottom of this sheet the complete record (by aadresses, and my corresponding earnings. “ (00 OT WRITE BELOW THIS LINC) and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ sigur 2/orasa Lata. Litanirnachs Ty TY ADMINISTRATION FROM SURE: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE To THE SOCIAL SECURS PERIOD From G-/-60 10 prtacak RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS NAME AND ADORESS OF EwPLOTER f.1. wumoer Snes & = louis |9"A GHRMLEW? /NFG Jo i. We- “4 y 6/60 |3° 4. wT Po Bex 1 ai, (hid WeEw ORLELWS / LP. ip 9), 0 4.2.0 3. j3 foe We WE ‘ far No We i /, y Ld, / 4 met 6. fame yok e eoeSTED NTI TIT 1S Estee Adve 1. rent ert Roald. Fol °. , ¥/l/ 6. 7 %. A 10. il, 12. %. Perry a P+ iret abirss | RATIONST we sitet Stas MEGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: ~t peer wate FIP Tie! fy EHO ad S 4 ” j ’ 25 i 0) « $39 Pee w cred Soe Do bY Lola NA yet, — = v. . . oii 4 CPE LAGOA GIGI BY HI CHLELOML TEMA, OBES 680 fOtm w.ae- 4.80 (7-96) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AMD EARMINGS IMFORMATION “” (Prane) ] aaioi L379 a lo seeeaene fay Signature le : : (00 SOT WRITE BELOW THIS Lime) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM 5.88; PLEASE SUPPLY THIS (mF ORMATION FOR THE PERI OO Fam Y-/-60 10 ~priecnl RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND CARuinas whet am0 4008855 OF EuPLovE® f.i. sumer Ps np al a levis 9A CrRMew) SAF LRESEMT RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS NAME AND ADORESS OF EMPLOYER €.1. NUMBER savrotaet mace @1-1180 |42- [51 q ge Xm L& bLayrenn fam oe a° O34 L506 30 8 (ay Tehinr fv 2 nam 2 " wis ' Te. a rUsT | Hota ae ti 4|s8 | 30377 7 \ q|58 23547 * a o|58 ner ‘. " p58 | 271.2 - a\s4 337.19 . @l>4 333.96 °. ‘ a|sq G'42.24 i : ra\s4 | 343 08 n 3\u0 335.80 12. : &|eo 4o4.uy 2 NALUNAL (Lik bag Gis sirmomatnt ne 1S REGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: 1 CENTH Z . 79 FIFTEENTH @RON" "4 Pe . 820 Lowich Building tis ac / 2026 St. Charies Averue NT@W ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA RAI E PTY IETS FLL SI NTA RR CaSO BANOS AAR ME 683 cee wc ae-4l60 (1996) AUTMORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO As FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION — DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER rast (print) | GustAVih Haywe GALE 9-€-2k Y¥3V-¥6-6599 rae CASE wawe AND NUMBER pivision of Accounting Operations social Security Administration candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland tear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the rottan of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ siiresses, and my corresponding earnings. Signature “ = [ y (DO WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) Tr THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD - ¢- /-£0 to _fdrigent ain: RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS Af NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER fet. NUMBER | Seen Oraeat | gag al CAL D & SEY MeuR Scis Rem pr bfél Yer Ve : scHkAm Bos. , Re far gS FAA b Va LZC ol Ya) cAMP SY: lp ot! po ot 2rle 77 1a ws “Gal? / | WEw ORLEA: y, Za ae ee J REQUTSTED IN"O*! NATIONA | Aeo2 Soi ptiesc Rakes tee ONAL ees ADORESS: FIFTEENTH REGION 820 Low'ch building 2026 St. Charles Avenue NEW ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA wn = = - RIT Re RTI ERIE SEMEL EOE O84 Form wins-4180 ee AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURWISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION “Wine (print) DATE OF BIRTH SOCTAL Stcuarte mene i vsTAV Awe GALE | 7-£-26 [Y3¥-¥6- crys WLAG CASE MAME ANO HUMBER ‘ Division of Accounting Operations : Social Security Administratian Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: ; Please list below and forward to the National Labor Helations Board at the address shown on thy bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. Signature ‘ eis © (00 MOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) : TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM ALRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD ul FROM $- 1-60 To fircicat 4 RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS : MAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER fol. NUMBER savcocurat wa CRLVIV D & SEV MeuR Seis kam Pr b fe You's. 7 scHkrm Bkos er GEGEN fe Lt 2s 2 27 073 pi 23feo 2) HIAce Welw OTLernvs = ite if é. See- mae Tne Te 3-55 426,90 e272) o-ss | #325 t a q-s5 172,09 10, " tA Ah 16.9% ii, “” I] 3-34 HAs,0% z bw J04, 10 12. ‘¢ GEG wir) a 3 4249 “PRAnyY ‘t 34> 3 £3; 7% 4. bh NAIUNAL LABOR RYLATICNS BOARY b co 254, 2 MIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: FIFTEENTH RLGION 820 Lowich Building qh 2026 St. Charles Avenue ye yew ORI FANS 13, LOUISIANA 5 “3 * ENT a i: eee | Be | I é 687 ww wuRe-4180 . n ae (1-96) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO bes FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARKINGS INFORMATION atpriet) 0 ‘) OF BIRTH ly TAL SECURITY NUMBER op A AEMDER SOM a gis / 43-38 - 39276 ap CASE wawe AND WUMBER Wg. 0o,Ins. 15-04-721 & 723 vision of Accounting Operations cial Security Administration axiler Building altimore 2, Maryland par Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor otton of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) o adresses, and my corresponding earnings. - ew: | Uicliz end iden (DO WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) Relations Board at the address shown on the f my places of employment, the employers’ —_———— SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD To THE SOCIAL soou ¥/-66 To DATES —— RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS wAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER £.1. NUMBER eanree oy aneunts 6? SEC MAR ZWE- “O3S7)957 Me we ia bly MAX AZ NE SF 1322-3e-veee Yc ayy es WEW ORLEFPIYs / LFA [vec Aid 79 2. ‘ ae f 30772 op! bb, Bh 3, fer Td, ; : (Hes ; CT Line THE REQUISTEN EITOT MATION 7 CIAL Shuai eid rir g 2 Z/ ___ NATIONAL LABOR FLATIONS BOAKL HRIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: FIFTEENTH “16 ‘N 820 Lowich Buss * 7 2026 St. Charles Avenue RUA i DG ig ). NEW ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA 4 : i F * 4 ts 2 ¥ @ 2 % + be LA RRR eI aah Miele UR ny Oey aed ie. 688 fFOmm mL Re-4180 "(7-56) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION WAUE (Print) va 4 SECuaity won . MLRB CASE MAME AHO HUMBER —_____da Ky _Bateer-fen Wg, Go.Ins. 15-8721 & 723 ——__ Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administratian Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown On the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. Signature /X (00 MOT WRITE BELOW THIS Lime) TO THE SOCIAL SECUMITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB. PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR IME PEBIGD TE E ee ¥ /-6¢ To Dare ; RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT ARO Camnincs — ; SANE AND ADDRESS CF EuPLOTER f.-1. sumeece scot — SEG MPR FTC 72-C3 775 7 We we 1. ily MANA ZINE Sf sn ihe 2 Shir eu: NEW CRLEPYs 1 [tes 3a 7S © , ms : : : ry — ' bo Pn hecbigl i IW ie, ford iy: s, THE REQUISTER HreoeseartoN F | SOCIAL Silini YY rewind Fir v% Y / 3 5. b/t/ Tue 6 3/62 Wen’ ’. o/b poonpley's é. Nifex Put gl fe) >. 10. — . “ly £ Dyk [Wry 11. 12. = Tt 13. ; NATIONAL CABOR JRELATIONS, BOARL REGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: FIFTEENTH ae 4 820 Low:chn Be ; a 2026 St. Charies sence Bing 160 5m). NEW ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA es Tb atl m pore wyae-9260 - ) (1-96 AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO — FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION ee et) oar OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURIT: NUMBER TIME (Pris g. Rose Marie Hicks | 3/31/29 435-346-2465 wias CASE wAME AND wUMBER Jj. Rutter-Pex Mfg. Co., Inc. 15-C&-721 and 723 —— , Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland ear Sirs: ; ; Please "list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the " bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ : addresses, and my corresponding earnings. 7 ‘ Signature 4 (00 HOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) =k THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM SLRPB: PLEA SUPPLY THIS !WFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD ds nD Resewt RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS i i NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER E.1. MUMBER coietaant pea al i _— = TTT el yor [BEE e497 . if | ee iz. /2-$7 G16" 7 ¥ LEH! 4 5 3-58 | 114.60: b.W, LLdmnnm + O2-6541| 72 y : I S Prenat. Ch, 0045-0004 | CYS SI b/s 3-36 amd. FO” , as’. 4s ¢-sV 24% Ze ; : $5 | ST 76 a / ASF | 204 be 5-59 | Moe! : 6-2 i Pipa 7. re 72 ; a inthe Brae, lies Ser | tre-3 ~ oe ae 5 ae (a-59| fel 70° ad J- bc 472 « op 4Q7 te Bo oe 5s ’ ‘ 4 2. : 4 Aa A Ane ; ‘ ; MEO Ha 3 , a c ‘ ‘daffi; ” ‘ i 5 ¢ 3 ae Shey oa ot ob be Listy ABO ? Sciiialil tai erste ya, 3 . Col £ ¢ legrrcdddian, 2. Sos 24526 3 634 250G LA 03 Ty I9[C/ 363./¢ J zz // é % 3 Yey or 9 4 Mr \\ open hy) ; 10 BR GF sud 4 ¢ a 1 b-ipla Py 12. 13. MESIONAL OFFICE apoetss: | ee bli NEW 650°. 0. SILL Lt VA . = — GEE IAS ES RPEITH CC Ir Py REEL P TY Wie Ba pty ABLE VER LNG OOO gO LSE TIES IB ME v Digs ot 3 - = PRESET RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS NAME AND ADORESS OF EMPLOYER f.1. wUMBER Md Be ao t. othr Dut 7a - %> 243,00 cee Ws Fe Oe Pls C61 AHGe ‘47 42h, 00° Jie Orkeane /2 Ana / Za\ 274-00° = f ¥3\ 7428.00° Ze co. 3. 4, Yes a2 Zz. od Ng | 326.00 7 Lad ectele Daw Duemuxz W- a 24h 7° . yi ; ; La Ee ore: eee 04+ WAT %7\ 2465 cv" - , ; 19-0004 - 060} Jie Athi darw£y SC, La ty 6 SL Arner A Ae~ F4- Ks HL, bFGF - 23 fayltance Pg C407 YA) Wle- Re . hearse 7 ; a et 4 ew a | ’ feo| L934 ¢. L4- 14U/ ~- COC} rs 4 - Y », p ofo~ Pe W- %y ry Yh CUVNME 49 %4y.00 % co il. te 4 “ey 10 ; Soe evden Heels (LID MLE Y Yo 23900 - : d tho \ OPT 234.0° ts : # “ Y%.\ 125.€°¢ G7- 6007 -o AE AROS 4 4.c0 HEGIONAL OFFICE ADORESS: roe 820 Lowich Building WM St. Charles Avenue a-enas NEW ORLEANS 13. LOUISIANA - - . lial NRG 694 rORm mL Re-4160 (1-96) AUTHORIZATION TQ SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURMISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARMINGS INFORMATION WaMe (Print) SLAB CASE WAMWE 460 HUMBER —___4,_B,_Bettee-Bem Mig. Co., Inc. _15-Cir 721 and 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address show: on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. pr COMRD REGIONAL OFFICE aooRESS: | sarees crea » tS Fos? G26 J pking ¢ tf Avenue 4/03 helmed te —pcheripeipeyi ttre NEW ORLL sled it, LOUISIANA, AY) PLP EROS SIL GL OI PIRES LEME LAT: SOLD, ICEL SIGE DSTI LEN BY PLE YY 21 0 ES TI Tes rom wiae-9300 11-96! AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO : FURMISH EMPLOYMENT AMD EARNINGS ImFORMATION ii ’ TIMLZELID | Date pf Biptr PE Stcumity muweer ay ie bE sJALICS OM glaeL7 439 - 30-0U2 TUR PYT TM el _ Co., Ine. 15-Ca-721 and 723 visit of poco in Operat .ans f oe Security Ate tistration sarier musi tine t.com 2, Mary, od he ‘gar irs: Plewe List telow ane forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address show) on the the complete record (ty quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ coop of *hs snee* ayremes, a oy correspond. ng earnings. ; Sigiature » " y . oe (00 WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) wrt Sor ibh SECUSITY AOMINISTRAT( ON FROM 8) OP PLEASE SUPPLY THIS (mFORMAT (OM FOR THE PERIOD jo-L-€0 to “Acura lk —— : RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT ANO EARNINGS aeet bat O7%etss ©F EoPiCVEe €.'. sueere Plight “ee” —_ SAW LAr Fr "Die - 6 OSE -O7 08 | Bye 7 OL Lil TS | a hh if = Lf \ja-otlti4e Lelhe 33-90 " Yo: 334-09 - fey pe Yor Répre not _ VA _yrr Dv€ oS PUNO Reyeell p 12 -03$s-ere H ‘. > PRWIANIT S | _ t [%22 / ay’ : y FR 469 ip/er SG ia! € WEW CRLEAW? 1° LA VYe/ 136.02 — aan PEI NCOP ABOVE, 7 i ” 4, _f{ SOCIAL Sunt Avid. FER pemints ! / hep 20 se fer Koexk 2G 14 Web Ys GSEs H4 _ ety Coby o. 4s cs | Lales 361 Ay Marcctl tlre. tur, JS Me 3-tom7-0135 | 3/@r | 36140 | att ¢ a ee / Je, | an 2 \29-040€969 6/G/ | S62 ss l] OT a Pn eTOCs PY ee 4 08 29 - hae, ie - Cale € 0t s0 0! 434 +H, ‘ | — + | me eS ee re 433% = | vo tn OLLIE IO SIL fod LOO ASLO gl Woy - = a Se ae EIT FON Ae Te OD “Rill 696 FORM WL RB-4160 AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO ae FURMISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARMINGS INFORMATION NAME ne NURS CASE NAME AND NUMBER J. H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co., Inc. 15-CA-721 and 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland SOCIAL SECURITY wuupee y ¥, eg : Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. Signature =. (00 WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) A TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM ALRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERI OC FROM 7 [s2 To KER put RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT and EAmnings NAME AND ADORESS OF EMPLOYER fet. NUMBER ps sph wae ag ao oe 34- ' fa aoe es A 16.78 2D Arhateeed 12 fu Ove 1677 49| Woah ; % WO7.6F ee . | 200.18 R Ha 273. 2? : “ ‘Wy | 465 94. ; ; Hg) Wee? | : V9\ 209.99 _— ; ‘ : B 295.85. 4 2F| NWoNe 6. a tte — id : hoeo| 379.11 0 - 1GY%O~ COOL 62.9; ? ‘ 2 ‘ (/ Ihe / 8. 9. “Ve _ Y vet 10. eeclal nee a 1. 12. TIONAL : 13. w FIFTEENTH REGION . wildiiis REGIONAL OFFICE ADORESS: St. Charles pio 3 UISIA NEW ORLEANS 13, LO Cest. , “3 FNAME RENTON, UP EIR VOA ALERT EOI PILE EID ITF BH MRE PIII IE EY RE IE DMM RIENCE SES ITY _— ror, wiRe~9260 ee 11-96) AUTWORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARWINGS INFORMATION Smt (print age OF RTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER Lelsmae l Aa bay e/a [1431 fy 32-V¥- VPs 1. B. ecter-Den Wig. @o., Bus. 15-Gi-731 ond 729 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland 697 Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, tlie employers’ adiresses, and my corresponding earnings. Signature (00 WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM 7-/- GO To —firta ve RECORD OF GHPLOVHENY AbD EAR NGS NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER fot. NUMBER cones’ gy ig 15490-G0 0/02 Fa Yoo 463.97 BF bahis Garmiwl | : > pas a4b.4F%- a u o/so° Gade : uv Yes 113.5% HPF 567 23° 6. 4 ¥. t . ve ‘ o/s b Lhe A 4/ 8 ¢/5¢ Fz0.74 1 ° . 9/5¢ 4AAGGF 10. ” lalgt 842A. lO, 13. og et ulcer FivteL 1 REO! 7 hg eon Lowich Building Ep) GdS 202% St. Caaries Avcaue Py, obi NEW OR).EANS 13, LOUISIANA MPLILE DELL VEEL IO LAN IGILIE DG CIE DD, VILLE LAI ALLELE IGE) _— ronu wi ae-4160 (1-56) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURAISH EMPLOYMENT AMD EARMINGS INFORMATION OaTe OF BIRTH wame (Priat) o£L MARTA 12-26-35 ¥3Y- SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ¥f-F6CO Bike CASE NAME AND wuMBER J. He Rutter-Pex Mfg. Co. Inc. 15 Haw Aiteens ioe 23. eo7- - may good 72- [7 AH4.0° frarrirs eer C45 7971 yy ane a 05 Menliity PULY CA Cae 26. aT Sa Sexe aa. Ky 108. bY 4 yi Liew bb Rees é. 7 “A 27. ae bk ok SE fit co72sve has, Cb" 2784 - 000% “ Ky \| 415 28. ae ; Ce braves Joe, 29. 33. 712 ~ cM NLRB-4180 (7-56) , AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO — FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION WAME (Print) OATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMGER Proctor, Mildred Hove 25, 191k fag a NAME ie ies ge Imes 15-CA-721 and 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of ne of employment, the employers’ f addresses, and my corresponding earnings. / ’ signature LALA Puedes | (D0 WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB. PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD Feow___ danmary 1, 1955 _ to ___ December 31, 1956 RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS NAME AND ADDRESS OF EwPLOYER E.1. NUMBER riotous as Asli Sue nae «os a9 | POF Li ihe bimit bership. £, Jet ese ot fe % yy I-SS G02 7 Ld-SS” os. 9/ YO 3 ¥-07-C022 3. 27. 7 ’ ; pOrbens. as E, YV3- 3-56 2 bo I ah SE ee hu A ee C567 Yoae 7 5 Ve7 2-02-3047 5. sek 0007 6. ee eS ae 72. 7. Beee y Hhpeld Lew baba the 10 367 $77 [yt- 96 aes O7P/-Sb~ 0613 8. ; 9. Z ee ee - YINIE i a Fis 7i- 6 56 379 5 Law pan Gf cJI 250 | e-y% lee.ry Mitel. 2 ae CY 30S fZ-b665 11 ‘ Sal 000) 12. a in, 13. . -'T RECTION 2 De, £20 Low." arigs Ave. [| NEW 63) SIANA PEELE DELLS LOOPING IA YL GE IE a —— 714 Form mine-0100 f (1-56) % 2 AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO * FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION WAME (Print) OATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY wumBeR 10-8-30 433-42-1128 WLRE CASE NAME AND NUMBER - =-CA- Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. - Signature (00 HOT WRITE BELOW THIS Line) TO THE SOChAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM Z l / $7 To PRESEN) ea RECORD OF EXPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS MAME AND ADDRESS OF EmPLOYER E.1. NUMBER Ja ts Bd we oF " Seat WEI~ | O7e tie farm & Wurduele 72-02066YA ~re2 | Wee Z32 Jraiam Fhneke Dh, . 7/57 Y16.0° mm wr (Chane, Fa F st 12157 | Y/6.06 tr 3ISE | YWGb,0°0: or be“ ¥ | Yb-0°" “{ GIS 6 U6 ae Ms (2156 | Ylb.00 ‘ it 3s 7 W6.00: 6157 | Yoprce- ? £9-0087 "a 775 Yb.00 ; 000/ | Aes yr 2. 7 ff flee as ‘ be Wonk _ 7. 47 NONE 8. Gy per D«# tigre’ hare Fa- fy| Véb,20 kt lA] -0%8- 00% = 29250 V9| WO, eo - oF Cate pr Le : Ko é Flew 6 wha kn il. 13. NATIONAL LABOR RiLAIY © w FiFTLE?DTH R'' a REGIONAL OFFICE ADORESS: ) 8m Lowen bone nr J DH. Casies Avenue Ags NEW ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA 719 ronm wi ne-4160 1-96) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION 1 das ejatr 35 SECURITY mUMBER B, Rvs lo ylas Y3% 34 ¥y¥V9 Tie CASE WAME AN oy “]. L benter-Ren Mg. @o., Bas. 15-€ir721 and 723 Division of Accounting £2 eee Os Social Security A@ministration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland ame (Print) Dear Sirs vleese list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. 4 Signature pst 8. foals (00 HOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE) 10 THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM KLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD . FROM j-l- Co 10 —pprsasat RECORD OF EXPLOYWENT AND EARNINGS AME AND ADDRESS OF euPLorer t.'. wumeer pnp ——, of A Roy ra a / ent Z Deer bet Gar. 3 Tuo fliGU oe § - i is Live end ’ SOGAL SLU.ast "fuath ben UL 26 1¢ Z s. 5. 6. 1. 8. %. 10. il. 12. 13. REGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: ~~ we WO sayy hove (4 -304/ 3 mam 720 hee oo Plaga (7-96) . AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURMISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION —_—_—_ Saul (Prine) MLAB CASE MAME an wUMBER SECumity CTT TTT) lY3g 34 ¥yy9 2. B Beseer-Ren Mig. €s., Bas. 15-@4-781 and 733 —_ 1 ——$—_— Division of Accounting Operatians Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address show on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. i — " of Signature _/f ty chy & Pe Re (00 HOT WRITE BELOW THis Lime) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY AOMINISTRATION FROM SLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS I mFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD row J - (- CO to freien 6 MECORD OF OHPLOYHERT AnD Cannings WAME AWD AOOMESS OF EwPLOTER fot. wumeee pt A Base td oF Ve? i Tas >| Prova Vel Pipot Bn MSG bak - Tid hoy | ; ‘Le isvsonkd [ABOVE MAL Sin v..0s) Perel. bass 4 Pe OR re ee = ohe/ 3093+ SEF 7220 + sila Chramw 1/5; La 1 My S08 6. // y/ Sb) FIS¢0 3for ‘ ye > 7 Vite C 10. tht Pa 13. Yeu. ove ( f H . 14-3047 721 Form wine-4160 11-98) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION i ero thy Bubit (B® Vere vo SLI AL SECURITY NUMBER by he ~ (Zt as aw Tine CASE WAME AND HUMBER — ES a J. He Ratter-Rex Mig. Coes Ince, 15-CA-721 and 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. wreath tit. c jf (00 SOT WRITE BELOW THIS Lime) 10 THE SQCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS I MFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM i )sy 10 ifilse wet T - RECORD OF CXPLOYWENT ABO CARN INGS WAME AMO AOORESS OF EMPLOYER tot. UME canise oF wa ae YY Rutter - Kay Prfg G ne 7a- % Wis oh 37297 Darlene off 029892 y|\ 67.63 ; Wi iw Onthane | a. a 4S 460.6/ : CO nscane ) 4 270 14 ~ovs0 -ool y A94.79 i. “ ™ cot, 000/ “ Ve : . Thi, WOVE Sup ee. 24 ‘ SOG Se. Hf Oe IS ENTEPED pagve = L202” ¢- 2h - ey 6. 7. 6. 9. 10, il. 12. - NATIONAL LABO RELATIUNS bURKL SIFTEENTH RS 1N REGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: sn 820 Lowich Busi y ‘Tg Charles Avenue " Ww St. is LOUISIANA R-o¢is i ie , FORM WL AB-4180 1-56 (1-56) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO “i FURHISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARMINGS INFORMATION MAME (Print) | OATE OF BiATH 1436 SECURITY wuweee Lie TON j2¢ [a 43S sy 2272 WLAB CASE NAME AHO NUMBER Eg ~ Ro4- MEG Ce IS wee 1 Ode Ky . 72 1H-1092 RE LY bat 5/9 Whoo ewer ; ve Deiddn e ja ~ "haw 6 thane 14 fc. 6/54. /b¥.AS~ Pia ee, wrti-n 1 OL we ; r Warr “ 724 FORM WL RB-4180 7-96 = AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO “te FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION MAME (Print) OATE OF BIRyM SOCIAL SECURITY wUmeee HATTIC UA KER eiez [ex Ib8S- 40-2207 NLRB CASE NAME AND NUMBER eee —___—_4,_B_Butter~Bes Mfg. Co., Bee. _15-Cér 731 and 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. J 5 ; Yo “A 4D Signature AQ Xe" * (00 HOT WRITE BELOW THIS Lime) TU THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS (INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD ew +p] SS ro PRESET RECORD OF DHPLOYWERT amD EARNINGS NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYER f.1. wumeen eapine 9° a Naafsl Are oy > oe GS uva.l/. : heowne m4 Piarw Braroaot Be -48 £_¢. ) i? 22 22° WFO AA YWUIGI2, », Pian OC rhtane La w Hl \ 244 2 M4 415.46. : “ AW Lad “ GB) 6 G5.09. z . Yi\ 79.70 # G72. 2% ~4 ad %7| 604.2, 2-105 - COLT Ve7\ 427.7¢. 6. ty a w= 0451-009 4- Wy | 109.97 Kelle Ladamsmnd ” eb 3/I1h Ly| none ; (As dt Chacta ft Ait Crhane, La %. Z é Ee es : - $,50 - goa PYy CG FA a AG a Vine Bex 43 //6 c LAA 58 5 Ye Jo. WZ & CnLarwes La ~ sie “ 49| 9.99 = = ¥ 64 ° gO 12. o ee " % waeibe ‘50 | MOVE 5 “a 13. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS REGIONAL OFFICE aDORESS: 820 Lowich Building 4 ye 2026 St. Charies Avenue NEW ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA R-AF3 —_ 725 — ..) PERIOD OF amOunTs OF waces ry ’ r.or » Get. Name AMO A00RESS O tcurvores é §-! »mumoee enPLoveent 4 PHT TE pte « Fa Vol 17-73 —— Jure~ J part othe it xy PP 204. 1%7\ /62.0> * 781 and 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Rel ations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ a addresses, and my corresponding earnings. J : Sees ee Signature cat ee OY 2 LOL (00 HOT WRITE SELOW THIS Lime) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM wf es /~¢60 To —firsern&h RECORD OF ENPLOYNENT AND EARNINGS NAME AND ADORESS OF EMPLOYER E.t. NUMBER ieee or oe, ORLEANS fPRISH VHool L4_ 072 00 74 Ybo /30-00 7 Berd J : CHIEF j 2°29-57-v0 3% lo 22 Xo 4300 HIAWATHA Ss, : a VEW ORLEPYS 3a, LA. on a oe 6/G/ : 7 oe. TT, ger ESTED NITORMATI Met ecualiy wkan PAR So? / 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. REGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: Hot val ermal Ne J FIF Tic: i iOCh 820 Lc lio ror ios 23 2025 St. Guedes Ary nie y 6 7 NEW ORLEANS id LULU WwIANA . o : és —a———— 727 ron wi Re-4180 ss AUTMORIZATh ow To SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNIS® cupLoyWERT AND EARNINGS IMFORMATION Tame (Print) i | - 33.99 [¢35. ¥o- sumser BAT MAME AND NUMBER 3-d3- : ast 783 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Lape og ge eect to the National Labor Relations Board at the bottom of this shee complete cord (by quarters) of my places of employment, ft a £ address shown on the the employers’ C423 addresses, and my corresponding © ings, ; er Ad apeern © ¢ _ WS ey ts (DO BOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRA OE FROM NLRB: 7-/-60 PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM To proce h RECORD OF GNPLOYWERT ANO CAREINGS MAME AND ADORESS OF OL rey t.1. sumeer met oa 1. Fa PRRIsH Spool \A-072 0074 Woo| /3°-°° CHLEE- ee tle “x0 300 iw Sous “2 639.590 / Z2y {0 ae iil 3 Pure RLF ae er: :. Ea ESTEN (xTOTMATIORN 1S ESTERED fet Ty ack ela / re iY Abwil. P bLul KOne 5. 14 2S 2/¥7-72 obtz| ft24 533 9/éL S57 CoCo Attar Ee. Botner n" : Ame IbZ $57, 2¢ > / ae « 0 ‘ f . yal Atrw if : 1% Cak. b/EZ TEL : f" " : 4#ft/ FI2sk : aie Pie 7 10. il. 12. Mr [rh 13. eesiona. OFFice mooeteas AaHeeet tren panes Rit) ht) FIFTEEN tit f2..GION 820 Lowich building 226 St. Charles Avenue NEW OKLEANS 13, LOUISIANA Btterneenemmenenmncem TS516¢. 1 ¥ BH. LS IR SMILE ONLI S OT ee 728 FORM WLRB-¥180 -5 AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO 4 4 1 l/g FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION & AME (Print) OF BIfTH NLRB CASE NAME AND NUMBER —____—_d,_H, _Butteraiex ig. ic. Ime. 15-he72) te 723 Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland SECURITY Num -Ob Fy Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on the bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. Signature (00 WOT WRITE BELOW THIS LIME) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM NLRB: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD FROM /ce-/~S7 TO Arcacad iL RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS a NAME AND ADORESS OF EMPLOYER E.1. NUMBER PERIOD OF MOUNTS OF EMPLOYMENT WAGES ERW/W 3. FRUVSF Ged 23 Z77T) ELF 27PZ-A MEW ORLEANS P LA. ffi Ft Lb St 9. = Ze? Zeit Shee SPRIP 10 dl ; Lae xT hd - Pot 7 F637 iil. eh | AZ ee fa wore 12. SELZY 13. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARL REGIONAL OFFICE ADORESS: FIFTEENTH REGION 820 Lowich Building ; ; 2026 St. Charles Avenue 37) fr. 7901 NPw ORLEANS 13, LOUISIANA Be 7_7—™—" 729 —_——— - 77 * pci y, nd Wage BHD AOORESS OF EMPLOYER Hedy pee PeRion oF Amounts oF th A Petes ene euPLorment wages 1“. yee tip oe ats FGA = _ bh? P “7 fr | 7 730 FORM wi ne-4180 1-56) AUTHORIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION TO FURNISH EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS INFORMATION WAME (Prigt) OAZTE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECUmITY NUMBER S NLAS CASE NAME AND NUMBER Division of Accounting Operations Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Dear Sirs: Please list below and forward to the National Labor Relations Board at the address shown on th bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, the employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. smut Qyrre lilatlane (00 HOT WRITE BELOW THIS Lime) ne TO THE 1), | SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM SLB: - Pees THIS INFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD room tp [sS ESEN T RECORD OF EMPLOYMENT AND EARuincs NAME AND ADORESS OF EMPLOYER f.1. wumece nes eee oF Taney 4. PERT Wale lela 7a ere Zs wp be . My © stay Seay” hag ; Hil \ 304.07 Fert iy sae >? AF A CVOEUS Yo 293 a {4 2. “ FG \ 307.20 3 “e 7 cA 3/7. se 573 -! Me) 361.59 ; See v ALdahooy tn ch. £47- 7o- "| 75.32 c fad 4 + Ys 7 ma oe Z ee i 0195420 a Ae (a “” 23 ° €5 ‘ 5. Io7\ 261.68. “ | A i (678- a4 Gy\| 259.4. ocs} te 1€0,0°, ae eg Se 7.- #o| 77.5, 1.24 a2 nc ul 0B 0 cece 0327952 P os 92-18 i ocez Ps sa mf ON CR kaha Be = Wen) 143.48. a re fe 4 ee ¥ AAR MAG MU pr s CIP VI5LE a 493 €7-5¢ a C19G i2. ; ; a is NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BARU ite sgnibe REGIONAL OFFICE ADDRESS: FIFTEENTH REGION “iv 820 Lowich Building fo* 2026 St. Charlies Avenue NPW OPV ANS 13, LOUISIANA Fidel 731 — mane ane a00RESS OF CurLoTER i aa 5) {.1. sumece vention oF cur.oteeat amounts oF wees oer f'- s. ‘ rs, a) 5g Se ‘ ‘ y ‘ *P 199.57. rf oVt 93/7 49\ 3.4. 1s. — Ay Mar, pe, ya- Wa| 272-¢° § v. 0377957 “Hey n- 50 cig Ms WHF. £0 . u. * : > Ko\| 297-9 : %o\ YFa-.12- ». n. es WP aide eee as “ > Bb. io aw a 732 Bit pnt fous ~~ eae ‘i (7-96) AGTUGRIZATION TO SOCIAL SECURITY AOMINISTRATION Te FURNISH EMPLOYMERT ABD EARBIGES IEF ORMATION rE Bs - - uy — SAU (Print) Stcuaity SLRS CASE BARE O68 HERE J. Me Rateeren Mfg. Coc, Intcy 15-44-78] and 783 Sica Division of Accoummting Operstions Social Security Administration Candler Building Baltimore 2, Maryland Deer Sirs: Please list below and forward to the Matiomal Labor Reletions Board «t the address show on ur bottom of this sheet the complete record (by quarters) of my places of employment, ‘De employers’ addresses, and my corresponding earnings. il iy (90 GOT WRITE OtLew THis Ling) TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION FROM HLO@B: PLEASE SUPPLY THIS IuFORMATION FOR THE PERIOD reom_____ gerd 2, 196% To Present _ @ECORD OF DUPLOYWENT sm8 Camniees Panioe oF amOuNTS oF AME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOTER t.1. sumere = ted 1. Sila Esa nfo Pars ome Le fara 2. a iw A= hn ON 1S taiehiv -. srk, “93° tartare dre Widen bu p Y2-03751M n/a eal, " if 6720 4/57 2 ulob . 9760 57 54 - THR + owe ; Ge) 4 4 é vs “f-* ah : Le t of . $ | : — BLE, cotati 7 Ye WA ow Ob soot TO" LZ ——s.-.——* 10. F 11. 12. 13. REGIONAL OFFICE ADORESS: ner, par > ATIO''S BOARD oui ses -y 27° FIFTRENTH REGIO? o>” 820 Lowich Building A 3 / ral 2026 St. Charles Avenu ‘ |) #2 NRW ORLRANS 13, LOUISI/ 733 GC-8 April 5, 1955 Registered Mail—Air Mail J. [Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.] --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386413_0136%3A02. Public record. Not legal advice.