# Appendix — Smith v. Hooey

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386413_0050%3A3

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Appendix
- **Published:** January 1, 1969
- **Citation:** 393 U.S. 374

## Text

; j ; y “7 2
om ne 2 ety $e: .

is‘ believed to

date

and cehed for notice

ee Pnee f : - :
; ; ee . ;
+ °
eT ig rss pe? Pi i Ia ES “A .
aif ying Cea. “De 4 hee “re 4 4
* }
Sitti’ “a Reo. 5. 7 hee
: ei _ 7 , i
" pos : a
g7 é -
~ Agr 5 al a, 3 e
st firs ‘ é
+ 4 ' s
? v2 me 3 4 ?
- a. s
A a Pa
¥ E _ Be
of ae
a
pant e

of any date petitioner ;
these respon-
date a ich p :
, willing, able and vious

| within two weeks of any date

Waa
yee
« 4 BD

3
‘il
nel

RA ae Qe ae ‘ ; ; C
oe hs Sk. SET AA 9 ,
= 4" bd we a \ we oy :
RS ae > : ’
s ft
+ n
’
’
‘ -
-
‘
. -
.
of
.
4 :
; Py j
. . ®. ‘ -
omugut - ‘ .
°
° -? eee
. . . . j ae ; a
7 .
° ‘ . ‘
. : ° .
. 5 Y
. $ .
: : : .
. . . .
4 e
° 3 e .
. ‘ e z = :
- a Je

¢ “Ne oe.
© 2 us
: . . ane z
o a : : . >
. .. bf
, > ry : ao ar
: ‘ .
* eS. ‘ . ks
" . . :
2 ‘ A : :
‘
K «
. a . ¢ . : .
. 2 . eo
- ee ° :
“
‘ ce : : P 2 :

=>

‘Caption — ee : za | aa , ee |
* Oplatans Beli sie
g Jurisdiction anaes nea ial ices eta - |
;, Constitutional. Provisions and Statutes Involved
Questions Presented a
"Statement of the Case-_-_-----4.----2--------
“Summary of Argument... iasigeiemiiediiaalth
3 Argument . > ee Posie We 7 NOM Ere
I. Petitioner Should Pay H His Own Way 3
“3 ile ib Dts aA |
TL. If “Indigent” Petitioner Must t Notify sie
Ae | ign Rtowinotnenone aetna rin See
III. State Has No “Option” When To Try |
_ Petitioner grange eine ntca nena senna nn }
IV. State Did Not Place “Detainer” Against '
_ * Petitioner --------------------------- ,
-V. Record Herein Is Insufficient: _-___-——__
"Vi. Facts Should Be Developed In Trial
Ws Court 7 si cies ini wie eependsi —
ON i riichccercineericon pvt ss.
I ia i
Certificate of Servien—— gana
EET E aa
’ be

Fede

op 5 aa

TABLE, oF AUTHORITIES

oh -

Coan of Tat ten
_ Article VF 22-22 _ =
"Supreme Court Cases 6

~ Sohngoa v. Massachusetts, 390 U. 8. — Z
20 L. Hd. 2d 69) 88 8. Ct, 1155.__--_

Pollard v. United States, 352 U. 8. 354, 360,

1 L, Ed. 398, 399; TT 8. Ct. 481, 486___-.____

-—"4 _ United States v. Ewell, 383 U: 8. 116, 122;
© WS Ls Ha. 2 627, 682; 86 8. Ct, 773, 719...

‘w. 1. &. Courts of Appeals Cases’ ee srerae
Dansiger v. United States, 161 F. 24 299

(th Cir. 1949) Cert. Den. 382 U. 8. 7693:

68 8. Ot. 813,92 L. Ed. 24 354.00 :

Fouts v. United States, 253 F. 2.215

ae Ss) er

Ex parte Lawoon, 98 Ter. Or. R944;

266 SW 1101.2. adap

Webb v. State; 161 Tex. Cr. R. 449;

_ =) 918 SW 2d 158, 159.____-. sss erie

- {

| Walid Ses Sette 7 paeeaaeeo iss

—- +

aa Wi 009 tee
- 18 U8; 4006 ic wine sno hie

ke

I. ‘
; ; en § aise eae
: Og ae ot
ogi, tae ae ;
ie . en
: J Nie
s

; ‘Article 302 3 Ae Seo
eof Criminal Procediire of Tezas of 1965

-Asticle 28.06 athe Stak Sas 1,15 -
"Texas Rules of Civil, Procedure eS hee
Rule 145

! Sr Ge

.
a
.
>.
4
! ad
| ? ov
! ~
.
‘ t i
P s
j
* ‘
; ~ : ;
g : j
“= }
4 &
s -
* +
- Tele
- *
-
| “
ad . ¢?
6 .
oy :
id ‘
‘ s
® 5 ofthe
° r o : ‘
% :
>
” 4

*%,

; ee
‘ : ‘
9 % “°
3
¥ M -
. A
.

ieee eo oe APPENDIX, B :
co | Memerandtim for the United States

baie Eavcoel thet dices bee
et the: sad States in this case, in-which petitioner has

al anus directed to respondent, Judge
4 | “Conrt of Harris County, Texas,
Scie sa indictment returned. in that
urt against ‘ F Oh March 16, 1960. ‘Since April © -
1960, ‘petition ey iA Neienal pentnet ming pall e
as the United. States. at .Leavenworth eaveR-
Bina ap yo hat pat
: in response pe that
first requested a speedy trial.on March 17, |
mean Sone aebinner tac-oalite) Gat ic mae inset
afforded « trial within.two weeks of any date..petitioner |
‘might specify at-which he could'be present..The prosecutor __.
~~ served:a copy.of his response to the instant-petition upon
the Attorney General “with the thought that he. may care
to specify a “se on which mane may be. eee for :

© encourag ot Poherdt Sth ie br fosbentions fn Ea
PO | risoners. The normal pro- \. | -
‘Samah postures o-ttened speek. :

__writ ad prosegwendem from the state court. Almost in-:
“variably, jose has: complied: with ‘such writs ©
"ang extended its sdoperatio’ to: the state authorities. The

} rit to mitigata the
¢oetito the stats, the Buren of Prisons ha secon al

oe ac % ans ae oe t . ra: ;
Da acta ad
in =

Pads

: \ Whapever any federal y ‘prisoner. lias ‘ian 2 initod ins
* formed against; or convicted of a felony page i
Sof reéord of dny State or the District of ‘Columbia, ;
the Attotney General shall, if ‘he finds it in the-publie .
.jnterest to do so, upon the. <— of ‘the Governor or.
the executive authority thereo and@apon the presen-. -
) tation ‘of a certified. copy of = indictment, informa-_

- tion or judgment of conviction, cause. such @ person,
prior to his releasé, to transferred to a penal or a
correctional institution within such State or District. : os |

| * the Bureau of Prisons does -not, homens: Ocnsider
it is if function to determine the date of trial .in.a state -
_ court. Occasionally, at the request. of the prisoner or upon
. his inquiry, the Bureau of Prisons has itself communicated -
with 2 local prosecutor, urging the disposition of pending .
charges and advising that the United States will produce ©
_ the prisoner pursugnt to a writ ad prosequendum. In this
_ ease, we are advised by the Bypreau of Prisons that,.except
_. for a detainer filed by the sheriff of Harris County, their ©
‘files reflect no correspondence from the District Attorney °
: of Harris County-with respect to petitioner. Nor did peti-
tioner’ request any assistance from the United States
Bureau, of Prisons. $5.
‘ «In short, the Bureau. of Prisons would seabilien 7 have
made the prisoner available if a writ-ef hgbeas_corpus ad.
prosequendum had been issued by the state court. It does -
appear, however, that the State at any point sought to
' _. initiate that:procedare in this case, r

~ ‘Respectfully submitted, |

. & 4
: - Eewre N. Guise,
_ Solicitor General, -

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386413_0050%3A3. Public record. Not legal advice.