# Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hernandez v. Donley

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386019_0908%3A1

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Petition for Writ of Certiorari
- **Published:** January 1, 1993
- **Citation:** 510 U.S. 818

## Text

| ay FY Supreme Court, US.
a) p é € Fo ial

MAY 24 1993

OFFICE Ur smit ULCRK
Ne,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
OCTOBER TERM, 1993

ABEL H. HERNANDEZ, PETIONER
Ve

DONALD B. RICE, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORI TO THE
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

ABEL H. HERNANDEZ
406 “H” St,

Saw Antenie, Texas

78220
(512)333«1600

Questien Presented

Petitiener,Petitiens fer a Writ ef

Certierari,en summary judgment ef the
lew ceurt fer the western district
ceurt ef Texas, and the epinien ef the

fifth circuit ceurt sectien fer the

Western district ef Texas,which is in

cenflict with the epinien ef anether

ceurt, ef Alabama,

The fifth circuit ceurt,sectien fer

the Nerhtern Dist. ef Alabama/ Pettway
vs American Cast Iren Pipe Ce. 411 F2d
998.,,,,held that where charge against
empleyer fer alleged vielatien ef Civil

Rights Act etherwise satsfies the lib-

eral requirements ef a charge,charg-
ing party is exercising a pretected

right under the Act and may net be dis

charge fer such a writing,,

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

Magmt ef Kelly AFB Texas:bldg 326
Temmy B Jorden-Deputy Dir,/Steven

H Deneghy Divisien chief/ Carles
Alvarado Branch/Afred Meina/Crespin
N, Vasquez/Herbert T Rippa/Ad Albert
Martinez/Frank C Schutter/Jehn w.
Pike Sectien/Richard D Kessen/Heme
Cadana/Refugio S Ries/Herman D Sanchez
Arture Gill/Richard N Nichls/

Gerald S Keller/Peicarpie Sanchez/
Atten M Nebgen/ Jehn R Laymen/
Guadalepe Sauceda/Hemer A Breeks:

Dera A Trevine Chief EEO counseler:
Elia Hernandez Lead counsel O&MeTenants
_Ldia Neriaga Lead counseler/ Warre?t .
Wilson/Yelanda Aranda/Milton Whitehead
Alice Mehran/Leuisa Herrera.

Equal Empleyment Oppertunity Cemmisien
1801 L ST. NW., Washington DC 20507
Chief of Staff Pamela Talkin/
Special asst. Ken Masugi/Jacy Thurmend
Alan Forst/Linda hula eeeeutive
Officer Secretariat Francis/vice chman
Resalie/special asst. Sylva Danevitch
Murhp/Galleges/Micheal Baldanade/
Legal asst. Glady Cellaze/Cemm Teny
Gallegos/Evan Kemp/special asst.
Christepher G Bell/Sherry Pewers/cemm
Jey Cherian/Exec. asst. Raj Gupta/
special asst. Byron Spears/Gen. ceuns
el Charles Shaner/inspecter gen. Willi
am Miller/Dir. communicatiens Legislat
affairs Deberah ~rir, taniy ef legal
ceunsel Richard Kemer/Dir. of magmt »
Jehn Seal/Dir. ef Pregram eperation
James Troy/

American Federal of Gevernment Empleyee
Lecal 1617 Unien Office 3311 Reselawn .
Rd. San Antenie,Texas 78226.

Pres, Leurdes Blanche Redriquez/Exec. V
Pres. R.C. Redriquez/ist V. Pres. Pedre
Leane/Treasury Jesus Huerta/secretary

Rere Mari Badrak/Chief Steward Alex
Redriquez/asst Chief Steward Santa...
Almares/chief Trustee Mary Leu Arce/
Trustee Robert Menez/Trustee Ray Recha.

AF CARA/ARD Wright Pattersen AFB Ohie
45433-5000

Renald F, Ederer U.S. Atty/4sst US Atty
Jack B Meynihan 727 E Durange Blvd
Suite A-601 San Antenie,Texas 78206,

Micheal L, Celepy Maj,USAF Gen. Litigan
Divisien,1501 Wilsen Blvd. 7th fleer
Arlington,VA 22209,

The unersigned counsel ef recerd
certifies that the fellewing listed
persens have an in*erest in the eut
ceme ef this case; —m7 GY»

CLA

Signature ef-Pre Se
406 "H" ST,
San Antenie,Texas 78220

ii

Table ef Contents

page
Opinien belew 1
jurisdiction 4
Staute involved 4
Argument 7
Cenclusien 18
Appendix A Detective Training a20
scheel.
Appendix B certificate ef .. . a21

completion Sar. Antonie Cellege...a22
Appendix C Letter te Pres. ef. . a23
S.A. cellege,

Appendix D Placement Data Brief a24
fer br. Hernandez.

Appendix E suggestion by Mr. . . a25
Hernandezto the Air Force suggestion
pregram, beeklet te order parts,

date June 1987.

Appendix F Hernandez 1987, the...a26
teol I made ini983,was not in

use befere,my suggestien.

Appendix G petitioners ebjection..a27
ef Oct.8,1992 to magistrate
recemmandation,

Appendix H Magistrate counter.....a30
claim te vetitioners objection

ef Oct.8,1992.,

Appendix I Netice of appeal te ...a33
the 5th cir.

Appendix J epinien ef the 5th.....a36
cir.

Appendix K Crisis in cemmand.....a46
Appendix L the mest pewer....... a49
pelitical Leader in U.S. from
Chicage, a democrat.

Appendix M Bexar Ce. Early...... a50
childhoed Develepment Program.
Appendix N Letter te States repr. .a52
Leu Nelle Suttens.

Appendix 0 censerning Secialism.. a54
and Cemmunism,(Karl Marx).

iii

_

———

Appendix P Marx thaught the workers..a57
weuld overthrow capitalism and

take power,

Appendix Q It was a leng bleedy.....a59
campaign fer Lee was a great general, |
Appendix S Indian Leader,made...... a61
commander brigate general by the
Cenfederate gevernment.

Table ef Authorities

casess page
Dioguardi vs Durning 139 F2d 774.. 2,3
Cehill vs Cahill 28 F2d 879........ 3

Pettway vs Amer. Cast Iron......... 4

pipe Ce. 411 F2d 998,

Diman vs Combustien Engineering.....10
284 F2d 57.

Hanna vs Chyler moter Cerp......... 10
44 F, Supp 802.

Guse vs J.C.P. Ce.,Inc.562:F2d 6....11
Mese vs Sun Oil Co. 636 F2d 154(a)..19

Statutes
Writ of Certiorari 28 USC 1254 4
Title VII 42 USC 2000e-16........ 4,5,

5
Tennessee Valley Autherity 1491....5
Pre Se appearance persennal.......
5
5

are by ceunsel, 28USC 1654,
Indian claims.28 USC 1505...... =
> ee OS a A ce kl eee ee ee eee

Ne.

In the Supreme Ceurt ef the United States

Octeber Term,1993

Abel H,. Hernandez, Petitiener
vs

Denald B. Rice, Secretary ef the Air
Perce,

On Petitien fer a Writ ef Certierari te
the United States Ceurt ef Appeals
fer the Fifth Circuit

Opinien Belew
During the time relvent te this case,
petitiener was empleyed at Kelly Air
Ferce Base,as an Electrical Equipment
Repair ,WG-2854-09.
Opnien ef the 5th fifth p. Altheugh
Hernandez preceeded pre se he had "ne

liscense te harass ethers,,, is in cen

flict with the epinien ef anether ceurt

secend Cir.,,Dieguardi vs Durning 139 ._
F2d 774: Mandez,Higginbetham,Smith,and
Demess,cir. judges: see petitieners twe
year cellege diplema,in pelitical
science and Liberal arts,educatien
specialty, appendix °

5th cir. p. Our prier sanctions ef
Hernandez spparently had ne effect en
him,as a result,we will award slightly
larger sanctiens this time with the hep
that Hernandez will step his abuse in
the the future. Mandez(Hispanic).

Sept. 29,1992: Tayler(Black) ,Jully,
Duhe,and Barksdale,cir, judges: see
petitien ef Dec.,92. cc te Supreme U.S.
and Seliciter Gen. Dept. ef Justice W.D
C..

‘o%eeseeeee 5th cir, the appeal is
friveleus and is hereby dismissed,,,,,

is in cenflict with the epinien ef ane
ther ceurt: Hernandez has filed his ap-

peal pre se effer * ne impenetrable-

( incable ef being cemprehende)shield,
fer ene acting pre se has ne license te
harass ether" this epinion by the 5th
cir. is in cenflict with epinien ef ane
ther ceurt,2nd cir. ceurt ef appeals:
Dieguardi vs Durning 139 F2d 774: A li
tigatien has the privilege ef declin-
ing all legal help net withstanding
that it may be difficult fer ceurt te
arrive at justice unless litigant cen
sents te recieve legal assisitant in
the presentation ef his case in view
ef litigant's limit ability te write
and speak English.
5th cir. epinien appendix ,» the
appeal is friveleus and is hereby dism
issed,,, is in cenflict with the epin-
ien ef anether ceurt : Cehill vs Cahil
28 F2d 879: the dist. ceurt may net di
smiss a cemplaint en the greunds thet

it is friveleus,,,,

The 5th cir. sanctien in the ameunt ef

4

$500.00 atterneys fee and deuble cests,

is in cenflict with the epinien ef ane-
ther ceurts the 5th cir, ceurt ,sectien
fer the Nerthern dist. ef Alabama/Pett-
way vs American Cast Iren Pipe Ce. 411
F2d 998,,, held that where charge
against empleyer fer alleged vielatien
ef Civil Rights Act etherwise satifies
the Liberal requirements ef a charge,
charging party is exercising a pretec+-.
tede right under the Act and may net be
discharge fer such a writing,,,
Jurisdictien
This ceurt has jurisdictien under 28
U.S.C. 1254 by writ ef certierari gran-
ted te any petitien,,
The Supreme ceurt has jurisdictien
pursuant te 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16 Title
VII fer redress,fer federal empleyment
discriminatien.

Statute Invelved

This ceurt has jurisdictien pursuant

pursuant te 1491,claims against United

States generally, actiens invelving Ten
nessee Valley Autherity:(a)(1)The United
States claims ceurt shall have jurisdict
ien te render judgment upen any claim
against theUnited States greunded either
upen the censtitutien,er any act ef cen,
EreSS,..,

The Supreme ceurt has jurisdictien
pursuant te 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16title WII
fer redress fer federal empleyment discr
iminatien.

The Supreme ceurt has jurisdictien
pursuant te 28 U:S.C. 1654 Pre Sere
appearance persenally er by ceunsel.

Yhe Supreme ceurt has jurisdictien pur
suant te 28 U.S.C. 1505 Indain claims:
United States claims ceurt shall have
jurisdictien ef any claim against the
United States, accrusing after August 13
1946, in Faver ef any Indian tribe,,,

arising under the censtitutien law.

a

(acts) er treaties ef the United State,

While petitiener,was statien

in Germeny,during the Vietnam
era ( netable histrical events)
The teacher fer centinues adult
educatien US Army: Je. Ann ifrem
Nashvilde; walk up te petitener,
ask petitiener will yeu visit
Tennessee, when yeu return te
the United States: She was frem
Nashville Tennessee,

Medern Americans are net very preud ef
the Indians. There is te day widespread

appreciation fer the dignity henesty

and uniqueness ef the Indain culture,
mest ef which are gene ferever. The
feeling is widespread toe,that every
effert must be made,at this heur,te rect

ify wrengs against the Indians,,,,,

Petiener was discriminated against be-

cause ef race and national erigin, Ameri-

can Indian, Fer the fellewing reasens

@r. p. 7.

Argument
During the time relvant te this case

petitiener was empleyed at Kelly Air

Ferce Base,as an Electrical Equipment
Repair ,WG-2354-09(Appellant brief Ne.92-
5664 p.2).

Om March 4,1991 and March 8,1991 petiten

ermetien the ceurt fer diquaificatien
ef judge Prade:455(b)91)where he has a
persenal bias er prjudice cencerning a
party. and te,assign civil casea Hernande
z vs Sullivan Ne. SA=90-CA-799 and Ne.
SA-90-Ca-771 te anether judge.

Feb. 1,91-SA-88-CA-237 H.T. fer San
Antenie,dist. ceurtp.32 and p. 33,
Prade,yeu,said, damages,,
Petitiemer, I wrete (it) dewn en the
(pleading).
Prade, which was$3,000,000. fer damages.
Prade,de yeu want me te make them make

yeu a GS-13?

Judge Prade, did yeu knew that title VII
desen't apply te a judge?

petitiener, ne,but they get( ether) Laws
that de.

The President ef the U.S. and vise Pres.
have jurisdictien te remeve,fed. judges,
clerks, asst. U.S.Attys, Military general
» cir. judges, Supreme ceurt clerks,
justices, etcs.

Tape Ne. 2-000 acerstding teiGS-13 -pesi-
tien,,(defendant),,, Oct. 23,1991/#1540
Tape 2-00-8/0ct. 23,1991 Prade,I den't se
e anything ,,,,, Tape31540,

Tape # 1540/0ct.23,1991 (2-6016) Prade,
is there geing te be any additienal resp
enses are metiens,,, filing summary
judgment respense metiens?

Tape # 1540/0ct.23,1991(206-30),,,we
sheuld have a metien within twe weeks,
it sheuld be dispesit.
Tape31540/0ct.23,1991(2=-6-38) Prade.OK.
I'll leek at that motien,,,,

Tape# 200D Nev.18,1991(9-39-01 )Petitiener
BOBY Mc Gee,, quality inspecter,, he said
that he kmews yeu. I think this is impert
ant that I state this,, he said, his net
geing te de a dam thing fer yeu,because I
knew him,,,,

Tape # 200D Nev.18,91(9-39-31) They(Air
Ferce) eliminate auality(inspectien pro-
gram).

One year 6 menthes after,on Sept.10,1992
Prade,erder, the metien by petitiener te
assign case Ne, SA-CA-771 ef March4,1991
is denied,

On July 3,1991 petitiener file a civil
action SA=90-CA-694,,it was assign te Pra
de by the clerks.

On August 20,1992,Prade, assigned case
Ne. SA-91-CA-694 te judge Garcia. On Aug
ust 20,1992 Judge Garcia erder summary
judgment fer defendant.

The issue presentea, the empleyer imprep

erly rejected vertien of petitiener EEO

ni

10

Cemplaint by alleging petitiener fail te

seek EEO ceunseling in a timely fashion,
Other cases have specified that a bad fai
th premise by an.empleyer which results
in the empleyee feregeing the oppertunity
te timely file a charge is a preper equit
able censideratien which may allew an un-

timely filing bv a cemplaint, Diiman vs

Cembustien Engineering,Inc. 784 F2d 57 (
2nd Cir. 1986).

(1) Petitiener was tranferred on Jan.
6,1990 frem the exciter shep te harness
shep. Hannan vs Chrysler Meter Cerp,. 443
F, Supp 802: where plaintiff was a sati-

factery empleyee,, ferce retirement,,,

Mechanic at harness shep why
yeu always iist to ceuntry music?

(2) Petitiener, was required te wear safe

ty glasses alday, and still beets, is in

cenflict with Air Ferce regulatiens(wear
safety beets enly when werking with Units
that weight ever 50lb.s See Kelly AFB

vs Tennessee Valley Autherity.

11

(3) Between March 1989 and Jan.1990, pet
itioner did net get electrenics centinues
adult training by Kelly AFB,

On May 1990,petitiener, was interviewed
by EEO Lead ceunsel Hazel(black)and Ye-
landa Aranda(Hispanic) abeut this EEO
cemplaint. Net getting extra training in
electrenics. The EEO ceunsels respended,
by saying “pay fer yeur own training out
in the private secter, yeu get enough
training frem the Air Ferce as an Air
Craft Techn."

Petitiener, reply :"why sheuld I pay fer
my training eut in the private secter,
the U.S. gev'’t pays fer every bedies
training at Kelly AFB.

see Kelly federally empley

ed wemen asse.:lecal greups

200:/ cenventien S.A.Tx.,

Denver Col.,Cininati Ohie,

Las Vagas. Guse vs J.C.P.Inc.

562 f2d 6.

( female) empleyee breught sex discrimin

atien class actien alleging that empleyer

unlawfully failed te previde same benefit

12

and cempensations to female empleyees who
were disabled from perferming their as-
Signed duties by reasen ef pregnancy,mis
carrage,abertien, childbirth, er recevery
therefrem as it previded te empleyees
with disabilities er medical expenses due
te ether causes,

(4) Adver actien by managment: claiming
petitienerleft toel bex epen. ey
Trevine, toek ever electric section,
Feb.89, Managment claim on March 89,peti

tiener left teel bex epen. Chief RCC
Ramen Perez,check teel bexes, from 86 te
89, never found petitieners toel bex
epem, see Appendix A .ef petitiener spe
cial teel te install new bears, made by
petitiener in March 83, used by the
empleyer since 1983,

The directerate ef maintenance has

every reasen te be peud ef this netewerth

contributien ( special teel made by peti

-~-

13

tiener ) te the San Antenie Air Legistics
Center. We are extremely preud ef this ac
cemplishment. Signed Lewis G. Curtis,
Majer General,USAF Cemmander,

(5) On April 17,1990 petitiener recieved
an unacceptable slightlvfuly sucessful
promotion rating, fer period Feb. 89 te
Jan. 90. Petitiener cemplaint that it
was net satifactery te my werk perfermanc
The empleyer change the premetien rating
te fullysucesfull, which was lewer,.

May 1990 petitieners EEO cemplaint was
review by EEO ceunsel Hazel,and Aranda,

The empleyer by lesing the medical

recerds en Knee injury(Baptist Hespital)
en are about July ,1990, and returning a
unit sham, the effect actien which impact
ed adversely on the EEO cemplaint fellew
ing my pretected activity under title VI].
The actien fellewed the pretective activ
ity within a period ef time that a retal

iatery metive can be inferred, therefore,

14

the cemplainant has established a prima
facie case based en reprisal. see peti-
tion for a writ ef certis-ari cc: te
Supreme court,and Atty general U.S. Feb
1992. p. 10,Baptist Hespital.

On are about March,91, Elmira was seen
in bldg 326,at at the T.0. libruary,
having a cenference with out ii wemen.

On are about March , Dana, move te +r
the harness shep.

Dana set in front ef Elmiras desk.
petitiener,ask a mechanic whe she was,
mechanic said, she was the unien steward

Dana meved frem Elmiras desk and set
en the werk bench back petitiener,
Danas set an appientment to meet, te dis
cusse the EEO cemplaint.

At the meeting,Dana,said, that unien ‘
steward Clayton Benten,weuld be represen
ting me instead, because, she was geing

te be in the hespital having her child
en April 1991.

15

Petitioner ask,Dana, why den't yeu ask

fer maternity leave , te the Air Force?

Dana,said they,were afraid of managment
Fed. Mager asse. lecal 140.
asse w/ ether mager asse,
Pelice mager asse. mem, 1500

On April25,1991 petitiener niece was -
shet in Dallas Texas. Venicia Hernandez
Gamez, 16 year @ld-38 weeks pregnant, but
live leng enough te safe her baby.

On July 14,1990 petitiener metien dist
ceurt te ebject te netice ed depesitien.
Pursuant te 3 Meer's F.R. 17. it allews
the use ef arbitratien incivl actiena
where the parties censnt and te remire
the use ef arttratien in civil actien
where the relief sought censist ef meney
damages only net in excess ef $100,000,

On July 13,1990 judge Prade erder that
Petitiener appear at U.S. Atty effice en
August 13,1990.

The depesitien at the U.S. Atty effice

was en the civil sue ef $ 3 millien: ef

16

March 10,1988: SA-88-CA-237,

Petitiener writ ef certierari granted by
the Supreme ceurt ef the U.S. .
At the deposition Gene Steel was the cou
rt reporter,210 Rie Sece, San Antenie,
Texas 78232.
At depesitien questiens by Meynhan frem
Manhattan New Yerk city.

Meynihan Qs: is yeur father an American
Indian? petitiener, yes.

Meynihan: shew petitiener the green
certify mail card, ef 18,1989, use te
metien the dist, ceurt te dismiss.
Meynihan: who's signature is this en the
green certfy mail card?

Petitiener, my fathers signature.

60 days after the deposition petitien
ers father died at the emergency hespital
at the seutheast Baptist hepital 4214 E,
seuthcress S.A. Texas 78222; en NOV. 15,

90.

17

On June 4,1992 EEOC WDC OFO, yeu have 2.
the right to file a civil actien,,in an
appreprate U.S. dist. court. Yeu have the
right to request ceunsel.

On July 3,1991, petitener saw Meynihan
at the clerks effice. petitioner was deck
eting the case SA-91-CA-694,

Petitiener,teday is my last day te serv
ice yeur effice.

On July 3,1991 petitiener,reauest the
service ef the asst U.S. Marshal Gary
San Antenie,Tex,

Gary,said, the cest te service the U.S.
is $80. cash. If yeu de net have $80,

L will net service the U.S. Atty.
Petitiener,said, the U.S. Marshal enly
charges $40,

Gary,said, it went up te $80. new Law.

Then, the effice ef theU.S. Marchal
send a refund fer $40,

U.S. Marshals are appiented by the city

er bereugh. Perferms the same duties as

18

the censtable er sheriffs de fer the
states. An efficer seme times attach te a
magistrates.

The atty general shall:(a) supervise and
direct the adm, and operatien ef the
DEPT. ef justice, including the effice ef
U.S. Marshals. Supervises all Supreme -
cases.

U.S. Marshal at W.D.C. investigates
alleged impreper cenduct en the part ef

U.S. Marchals services persenall.

Cenclusien
The dist. ceurt err in granting summary
judgment te defendant,and 5th granting
sanctien of $500. Atty fees and deuble :

cest.

Petitiener, file sue in the ameunt of

19

$3000.000. in the dist,court
Meese vs Sun Oil Ce. 636 F2d 154(c)

grant punitive damages in the amount of,,

Respectfully Submitted

DZ Mp 2 A
y LA. thy he o Me

ignature “of Pre Se

Petitiener:
406 “H* ST.
San Amtenie,Texas 78220
Abel H, Hernandez
(212) 333-1600

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I Abel H. Hernandez, de hereby certify

that three copies each of the fere going
Petitien fer a Writ ef Certiorari te
U.S. ceurt of appeals for the Fifht cir.
was service prepaid te the Seliciter
General Dept. ef Justice,Washington D.C.
20530, On the 20- day ef May 1993.

LA LEE era

Abel H, Hernandez

Appendix A

a20

INTERNATIONAL DETECTIVE TRAINING
SCHOOL : P.O. BOX 4352

WASHINGTON D. C. 20012

SEPTEMBER 23 ,1981

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
RE: ABEL H. HERNANDEZ
NO: 4036
The above name person is a graduate
Of THE INTERNATIONAL DETECTIVE TRAIN-
ING SCHOOL , having completed our Home
STUDY COURSE IN DETECTIVE TRAINING

with an average Grade of 86 per cent

While enrolled as a student in our
SCHOOL , he fulfilled al} responsibilities

to our entire Satifaction . The Student was

a2i

conscintious , painstaking and punctual in

the work prescribed

I found him industrious , careful in
fellowing instructions ,and eager both
to please our instructors and to learn
the maximum from the subject matter

furnished

From my experience in working with
the subject , I feel he will prove a
every satisfactory employee in any
position for which his education and
experience might qualify him andI _,
personally , will appreciate any

consideration shown to him.

Appendix B a22

San Antenie Cellege

San Antenie Texas

Be it Knewn That
Abel Herrera Hernandez
has cempleted the prescribed requirements
and is entitle te receive this
Certificate ef Cempletien

May
Date

Jereme F, Weynand
President ef the Cellege

W.W. Me Allister ,Jr
Chairman

Truett L, Chance
Dean ef Cellege

Stan Burten _
Secretary ef Beard ef Trustees

Appendix C a23

August 21,1978

Jereme Weynand

San Antonie Cellege
San Antenie, Texas
Dear Sirs

Because ef the nature ef my problem, I
am at this time requesting in written frem
a detailed explanation ef my grades receiv
ed in my Histery class, and in my Debate
class at San Antonio Cellege, Until such
time that I may persenally talk with the
individual teachers invelved, I am reoauest
ing frem yeur effice transcript ef my ss
grades received.

I feel that the grades I received in
these classes are unjust and I wish te per
senally speaking te each instructer-.te
explain my pesitien. I beleive I have rea-
sen fer a change in my final grades receiv
ed in these twe classes.

I made an appeal te the cemmittees
and their reactien te my appeal was te

seek eut the instructer.

Appendix D a2

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Headquarters San Antenio Air Legists Cent

78544 AEOBS Kelly Air Ferce Base.Texas

DEC 16,1985

Reply te
Attn er; DPeSI

Subject: Recerds ef Abel Hernandez
Te: DPCXT
1. Attached yeu will find the placement
Data Brief fer Mr Hernandez and a certi-
ficate ef training fer a ceurse entitled
Aircraft Pneudraulic “ystems Mechanic

ceurse,.

Zeveeveree

Signed Antenie Salas
Chief, Maintenance Staffing

2 Atch
1. Placement Data ._-
Brief.
2. Certificate ef tr-
aining.

DPCCI/58955 Career Srief MATPPA/ Hern-
andez 3-21-86

Attached are twe cepies ef yeur current
career brief. Please review,sign and re-
turn ene copy te this effice. It will be
filed in yeur OPF fer yeur future use,
siged Evelyn Alva M.Classificatien FDP

Appendix E a25

Suggestien Ne. 87-2655 June 26,1987
Beeket with all part number and steck Ne.

Te erder parts at Mic/ 7.0. enly gives
part number,,,( ne Steck Number ),,.

If Air Ferce makes a small handbeeket
fer-each shep, as part ef teel bex.
save time,and aceuracy te -arder frem Mic.
Beeket with part number and steck numbers
en each T.0O. .

Every Organizatien/shep en base, that
den't have ene, at present: and every Air

Ferce Civilian base that den't have ene,

Signed Abel H. Hernandez
cc: Phyllis B. Lane/ suggestien pregram
Persenal Data.

Appendix F a26

Abel H. Hernandez: Sept. 23,87
Te: DPF
I weuld like my suggestien SA86-159 te
be re-evaluated as I feel the $100 award
made-en it is net sufficient.
Facts that sheuld be censider are.
(1) The teel I meodified/made/was net in
use, (because they did net have ene te use
(2) Befere my suggestien was implemented
the bearing were net being replaced in *
the pumps; this grudually cause ether
parts te ware prematurely.
(3) With my teel new bearing are new be
ing installed making this a true everhaul
(4) I knew my suggestien co:tributes te
extra service in flight and there fer has
a larger tanglble saving;base en extente
service life.

Rev (/24 Chis Vance

cc.P.E, Ferrdner
Suggest. Pregram Sincerity

Kelly AFB Tex. YL MA Kos amet A

Persenal Data. Abel H. Hernandez

Appendix G a2?

In the United States District Court
for the Western District ef Texas
San Antonie Division

Abel H Hernandez,
Plaintiff,
vs Civil Action Ne,

Denald B. Rice Secret. Sa-91-CA-694
Dept. ef the Air Ferce.

Object

Object to Sept. 15,1992, Magistrate
judge's memorandum and recemmandatien
pursuant to Fed. Rules ef civil Prece
dure 73 (b) Censent.

Ne district judge,magistrate er ether
court efficial shall attemt te persuade
er induce a party censent te a reference
ef a civil matter te a magistrate under
this rule,ner shall a district judge er
magistrate be infermed of a party's resp
ense te the clerk's notificatien, unless
all parties have consented te the referr
al ef the matter to a magistrate,

Object with conclusien

ef law te Primeme and
O'Conner magistrate

a28

memerandum and recemmandation

O'Cenner cites a case ef class action,as
a conclusien ef law te interfere with ~'
the working class; rights te sue under
Title VII. Ries vs Enterprise Ass'n Stea
mfitters lec U 3638 ef U.A. 520 F2d 352.
U.S. ceurt of appeals, second cir. Argue
May 1,1975. Decided June 241975. After a
federal court had entered an erder in
civil rights action requiring affirmativ
action en the part ef aunien te remedy
racial discriminatien in its membership,
and while an appeal frem that erder was
pending, while members ef asserting that
they were victims ef discrimination by
the unien in regard te certain perferenc
given te members ef the "A" branch ef th
union. The U.S. district court fer the -
Seuthern district of new Yerk, Dudley B
Bensal,J., denied the application te int

ervene and the applicants appealed,

a29

Plaintiff suer file this civil action
frem a final decision ef the agency cen
cerning my EEO cemplaint ef unlawful emp
leyment discrimination, in the civil

rights act ef 1964,as amended, 42 U.S.C.

2000e et seg.

This cenclusien ef law is submitted in
accerding to are conversatien ef OCT. 7,
92, with asst. clerk Garcia/ request a

cenclusien ef law.

Signed Abel H Hernandez

Signature ef Pre Se
ae. “i” &l.
San Antenie Texas 78220
Abel H Hernandez

ces Jack idsbetnan Submitted Oct. 8,1992

asst U.S. Atty

Rebert O'Cenner

magistrate judge

Jehn W, Primeme

magistrate judge

Appendix H 930
In the United States District Ceurt
Western District ef Texas
San Antenie Divisien
Abel H Hernandez
Plaintiff, Civl Ne,
vs SA-91-CA-694
Denald B Rice,Secret,
Dept. ef the Air Force,
Defendant.
Order
On this date came en fer censideration
by the Court plaintiff's submissiens
ebjectien te the magistrate judge's Sept
15,1992 erder denying plaintiff's requ
est te preceed in ferma pauperis en
appeal, The ceurt has reviewed plaintiff
numereus submissiens containing his eb
jectiens as well as the entire recend,.
The magistrate judgefeund that the
district court had granted summary judge
fer defendant on August 20,1992 after
that plaintiff had submitted ne céntrev

erting evidence. The magistrate judge al

se feund that plaintiff had listed the i:

issues which he intended te appeal. He

a31

feund that plaintiff had explained
why summary judgment should net taken in
good faith and was friveleus,

Plaintiff's ebjectiens cite federal °°"
Rule ef Civil Precedure 73(b) prevides
the eppertunity fer litigants te censent
te civil trial jurisidictien befere the
magistrate judge.

This cause did net invelve censent jur
isdictien. Pliantiff's other legal and
factual prepvesitiens similarly de net
affect the magistrate judge's assessment
ef the issue, The decisien by the Air
Ferce Review Beard in the matter alse
dees net alter the cenclusiens reached
by the magistrate judge.

After due censideratien ef each ef ‘1
plaintiff's ebjectiens in cenjunctien

with the entire recerd in this case,

this ceurt finds that the magistrate

judge's Sept. 15,1992 erder denying

a32

plaintiff's reauest te proceed in ferma
pauperis on appeal is hereby in all
things affirmed,

Signed this 15 day of October ,1992.

signed H F Garcia

H F Garcia
U.S. Dist. Judge

Appendix I a33

In the United States Distreit Ceurt
for the Western District of Texas
San Antenio Divisien
Sept.3 92

Abel + Hernandez
Plaintiff,

vs Civil Action Ne.
SA-91-CA-694

Denald B, Rice Secet.
Dept. ef the Air Ferce,

Netice ed appeal te the Fifth Cir. Ceurt
ef Appeals,Under rule 3.

Appellant Abel H Hernandez appeals
clerk judment fer Denald B, Rice,ef August
20,19992.

Defendant's metien fer summary judgment
is granted,signed judge H.F. Garcia,en
August 20,1992,

On Sept. 10,1992 the defendant filed a
metien te dismiss, er in the alternate fer
Summary judgment.

District court clerk judgment ef August
28,1992. Secend part ef erder,defendant's

metien te dismiss is denied as moet.

,

a34

Appellant statement en 28 August 92,
As a matter ef law pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 56 (c) . Was not considered in
the judment by the dist. court clerk en
31 August 92- te deny appellant respense
en erder of 28 Aug.92.

The fellewing dacuments evidences will
be en appeal. All documents en recond
will be used en appealen recerd excerpt
fer appellant.

i. appellant Pleadings ef July 3,1991./
2. Civil Decket fer case#910CA-694,/
3. Order August 20,92./ &.Answer te defe
ndant metien for stay ef march 30,1992,
%, Clerk erder deny appellant respense,
31 August1992/ 6.Hernandez vs Rice Ne.
89-486/ ‘etitien granted by Supreme iceu
rt ef the U.S../ 7. 110 Supreme court re
perter Hernandez petitiener vs Rice secr
etary ef the Air Force Ne. 89-486,
Respectfully Submitte

Signed Abel H Hernandez

a35

Abel H Hernandez

hO6 "H" ST,

San Antonio Texas 78220
Sept. 3 1992

I Abel H Hernandez
mailed a cepy to US Asst
Atty Jack B, Meynihan

on Sept. 3,92.

727 E. Durange blvd

San Antenie,Texas 78206

=

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Appendix J a36

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT US COURT
QF. APPEALS
FILED
FEB 22 1993
RICHARD E.
WINDHGRST,
Ne. 92-5664 JR. CLERK

Summary Calendar

ABEL H. HERNANDEZ,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
VERSUS
DONALD B. RICE,
Secreatary, Department ef the Air Ferce,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appealfrem the United States District
Ceurt fer the Western District efTexas

(SA-91-CA-694)

Befere HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and DeMOSS,
Circuit Judges. JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit

Judges:

a37

I.
A.

Abel Hernandez werked at Kelly Air
Terce ‘Base as a pneudraulic systems" mee
spledie, Om April 27, 1990, he first cen-
tacted an Equal Empleyment Oppertunity
{EEO} ceunseler regarding five aliedged
acts ef discriminatien, claiming he was
discriminatea against based upen his race
¢American Indian) , color ("dark brewn"),
ana religien ("Study ef Scientifie Beli-_
ef and Nature"). Hernandez alleges five
specific acts ef discriminmatienm as fel- —
lews:

1. He was transferred en January 6,
1990 frem the Exciter shep te the Cable
shep.

2. Hee-waes-required te wear safety

beets and glasses en January 6, 1990.

3. Between March 1989 and January,

1990, he failed te recieve additienal jeb
training,

a38

4, On “arch 27, 1990, he was warned
abeut leaving his. teels unattended.

5. On April 17, 1990, he recieved a
perfermance rating that he censidered te

have been te lew.

*Loczl Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The
publication ef epiniens that have ne pre=
cedential value and merely decide partic-
ular cases en the bases of well-settled
principles ef law imposes needless expense
en the pvublic and burdens en the legal p-
refessier. " Pursuant te that rule, the
ceurt has dtermined that this epinien sh-

euld net be published,

Pursuant te 29 C.F.R. 1613.214(a)(1)
(1), defendant netified plaintiff that the
first feur allegatiens were rejected as
untimely filed, Hernandez appealed this
rejectien te the Equal Empleyment Opp-
ertunity Cemmissien (EEOC), wnich affrirn-.
ed .ue defendant's partial rejectien te
the Equal Empleyment Oppertunity Cemmi-
sien (EEOC), which affirmed the defende

ant's partial rejectien ef Hernandez’s

Claims, The defendant preceeded te inv-

a39

estigate the fifth claim and feund that
Hernandez's appraisal rating was net the
result ef discriminatien.1

Specifically, the defendant feund Her-
nandez had with the fellewing: (1) spene
ding tee much time away frem his werk

area; (2) an inability te werk en differe

equipment

(3) undue reliance upen his superviser

when cenfrented with a preblem;

(4) difficulty relating te ether empleyees;
(5) difficulty fellewing
technical erders; (6) erdering parts in
excess quantities when the service was
attempting te keep inventeries lew; and
(7) an unwillingness te fellew the erders

ef his supervisers,

1 Although Hernandez's appraisal
rated his perfermance as “fully successf-
ul," he claimed he deserved the highest
ratings pessible fer eight ef thenine ap-
praisal categories.

ahoO

B.

“ernandez, acting pre se, filed suit
en July 3, 1991, challenging the five. al-
leged acts ef discriminatien eutlined abe
eve. On August 20, 1992, the district
ceurt granted summary judgement fer the

defendant.

If.
A.

The decisien ef the district ceurt is
cerrect as te the first feur allegatiens
ef discriminatien. Her-

nandez did not repert these alleged incid-
ents within thirty days, t eugh he plai-’

nly knew abeut each ef these events en the
it eccurred., Under EEOC regulatiens,. these
claims were net timely. See 29 C.F.R.

1613.214(a)(1) (i).
In apprpriate cases, the filing deadl-

ine is int he nature ef a statute ef lime

itatiens, subject te waiver, estoppel, and

alt

equitable telling. Hendersen v, United

States Veterans Admin,, 790 *.2d 436, 440
(Sth gir. 1986). Obvieusly,. this case
dees net present a preper eccasien te de«
part frem thenermal deadline. Hernandez
was well aware ef these deadlines, as he
previeusly had filed six discriminatien~
claims against the same empleyer, yet he
failed te preduce any summary judgement
evidence supperting an exceptien te the

thirty-day dead-line. ails
B.

The district ceurt’s decisien as te
the fifth alleged act ef iiscriminatien
also is cerrect. The 2cfendant preffered
ample evidence as te why Hernandez recie-
vied his score en his evaluatien. Once
defendant made a prima facie shewing that
had a lecitimate nen-discriminatery rea-
sen fer the adverse actien,2 Hernandez
had the duty te preduce seme piece ef ev-

idence tending te raise a material issue

a2

ef fact as te mether defend-nt's justi-

ficatiens were prete:.tuai. see Tex:s

Dect. ef Cemmunity Affairs v. Burcine, -

450 U.S. 248, 254 (1981); Celetex Cerp,
vy. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986). Becau-

ee Hernandez did net preduce any evide-
nee ef discriminatien, tre district court

preverly granted summary judgement.

IIl.

The defendant :sks t”2t we award —-.
sanctiens against Hernandez fer filing a
friveleus appeal. Hernandez has filed
six previeus cesplaints against defendant
fer alleged discriminatien. Apparently,
he blames all efhis preblems en discrimi-
natien and centinues te use the judicial
system for thepurpese ef harassment.

We have _previeusly awarded sanctiens

Hernandez fer filing a friveleus appeal

a43

--

2 We use theterm “adverse action” enly as
a term ef art. Hernandez‘s evaluatien
was “whelly successful,” which weuld not
seem te be an “adverse actien.” Hernand«
ez claims enly that he sheuld have had a
better rating. Given that his evauatien
was “whelly successful,” hewever, Hernan
dez dees net indicate hew was harmed in
any way. In ether werds, he has net ide-
ntified any less ef benefits frem his ra-

in a discrimination case. Hernandez v,

Rice, Ne. 91+5785 (Sth Cir, Sept. 29, 1992)
(unpublished). The district court in ‘hhe
present case refused Hernandez's metien

te preceed in ferma pauperis based upon
its dterminatien that the appeal weuld
be friveleus, We agree that the appeal

is frivoleus. Hernandez preduced ne ev-
idence in response te the metien fer su-
mmary judgement and dees net ceme clese
te having a meriterieus arguement en ap-
peal,

Although Hernandez preceeded pre se

he had "ne liscerse te harass ethers,

cleg the judicial machinery with meritl-

all

ess litigation, and abduse alre dy everl-

eaded ceurt deckets.” Fargusen v, MBank

Heusten, N.A.» 808 F.2d 358, 359 (5th -
Cir, 1986). We may preperly award sanc-
tiens te deter future abuse ef the ceur-

ts, Ceghnlan v. Starkey, 852 F.2d 806, %'s

816 (5th Cir ,1988) (per curiam).
Our prier sanctiens of Hernandez 4-
pparently had ne effect en nim. As a r-

esult, we will award slightly larger ga- -

netiens this time with the hepe that He=
rnandez will step his abuse in the futu-
re. We warn Hernandez that penalties-
fer any future friveleus filings will be
mere. severe. Because Hernandez had ne
netiens this time with the hepe that He-
rnandez will step his abuse in the futu-
re, We warn Hernandez that penalties
fer anv furture friveleus filings will
be mere severe. Because Hernandez had

ne basis fer his pesitien err appeal, we

a5

grant defendant’s reauest fer sanctiens
and impese sanctiens in theameunt ef $5-
00.00 atterneys' fees and deuble cests.

The appeal is friveleus and is he-
reby DISMISSED pursuant te Fifth Cir. °
Lec. R. 42.2.

Appendix K ah6

CRISIS IN
COMMAND
HRD
Mismanagement: in the Army
Richard A. GabrieL

and Paul L. Savage

Americans whe believe thrt the United

States Army is a fit fighting ferce may be
in fer a rude shock, The authers ef this
pewerful and frightening beek. fermer sel-
diers leng and intimately asseciated with
the Army, demenstrate that eur natienal d-
efense is far weaker than we may imagine.
In the event efanether war, we face the
pessibility ef rapid defeat because ef mi-
litary mismanagement.

Even befere the final debacle in Vietnam
(when, as t e 2uthers shew, eur ferces were
streng indicatiens that eur efficer cerps

was mere cencerned with furthering their

individual careers than with develeping

a4?

cehesien, Hener, integrity, and personal
respesibility had been abandened te selfi-
-sh ends. It was net the antiwar sentiment
at heme that destreyed the Army's effecti-
veness; it was the Army brass itself.

The war in Seutheast Asia saw hithere
virtually unheard-of assassinations ef ef-
ficers ("fragging"); cembat refusals in
high numbers; falsified reperts; events
like that at My Lai: an inflated efficer
cerps;: the hestewal ef unearned medals
and heners; a retatien system that discrie
minated against enlisted men; an emphasis
@n bedy count; racism; andaherein trade
and depe addictien ef epidemic propertiens
that the military managers either ignered
er were ignerant ef. Mest ef these prebl-
ems were netcaused by theé-war; they were
breught te light and exacerbated by it,

In spite eftheclaim that thefaults se
evident in Vietnam have been cerrected,

teday's Army remains ill-prepared, This

al8

startling beek prevides thedecumented ev-

idence.

This beek has been purchased fer
theSan Antenie Public Library system
frem Federal funds distrubuted threugh
the Texas State Library.

re

Appendix L ah9

Daley Jeseph, a Demecrat, was majer ef
Chicage. He was ene ef the most pewerful
pelitical leader in the United States.

Daley headed the Ceek Ceunty Demecratic
erganizatien,perhaes the strengest pelit
ical mechine in the U.S... He became an
adviser te President Lynden B. Jehnsen.
Under Daley's leadership,Chicage reergan
ized its pelice department,enceuraged .
the structien ef mary majer dewntewn
buildings. In the early 1970's Daleys
administratien was recked by several .
scandals and trials invelving cerruptien.

Many high efficals were feund quuilty.
Over 50 pelice efficers were cenvicted
ef taking bribes frem tavern ewners.

Ohie Gang: A group ef Peliticians;
chiefHarry M. Daugherty aided in secur
ing the neminatien and election

_ @ef..Warren Harding:

Harding Pres. U.S./Ohie Senater/Nemina
ted for Pres. in Repeblician Nat'l

cenvention Chicage Ill. 1920.
Member ef the Baptist Masens.
Harry was appionted U.S. atty by
Pres. Harding.

Buisys a a Re ree ee

Appendix M a50

EDMUNDO M. ZARAGOZA executive directer
EODC ef S.A. and Becar Ceunty,Texas P.O.
Bex 9326- S.A. Texas 78204. Sept. 7,1978
The Henerable Henry B. Genzlez,M.C.

727 East Durange,Suite B-124

San Antenie,Texas 78206

Re: H4-78r
Mr. Abel H. Hernandez

Dear Cengressman Genzalez:

This cerrespendence is in respense te
yeur letter ef August 15,1978, cencerning
Mr. Abrl H. Hernandez, whe had applied fer
the pesitien ef center manager I within
EODC, Early Ghildheed Develepment Pregrams,

While Mr. Hernandez's resume did net shew
any experience in weking with yeung child-
ren, which the pesitien required, his indi-
cated werk experience in ether area te in-
clude the military, was impressive eneugh
fer him te be granted an interview fer the
pesitien, Befere a final selectien was made
this pesitien was abelished because ef a

reductuien in pregram funds,

adi

Upen his expressiex ef interest, Mr.
Hernandez will certainly be given fair
censideratien fer empleyment with this
erganizatien.

Respectfully yeur, Hbert H. Hawkins
EODC directer of persennel

Cemmunity Actien fer cemmunity Pregress-
manpewer * educatien * health * yeuth serv-
ers * heusing * nutritien * secial servics
Mr. Micheal P, Redriauez Pres./ Mr. Herbert
Helsten ist vice Pres./ Mrs. Beverly Halter
2nd vice Pres./ Mr. Jese Luis Redriquez-
secretary/ Mr. Jese V. Certez Treasure/

Mr. Jese Snider Parliamentarian/ Mr. Max

Navarre Past Pres. :

Appendix N a52

August 18,1978

Mr. Rey Burley

State Representive Leu Nelle Sutten's
Office 1609 E, Heusten Street

San Antenie, Texas 78202

Re: Abel Hernandez
SAC Student

Dear Rey:
As per yeur request ef August 14,1978,

I have inquired inte the cencerns ef Mr.
Abel Hernandez.

His majer cemplaints were that he was
net graded preperly, that he was being
discriminated asainst and that his cempl-

ains were falling en deaf ears.

I speke with Dr. Weynand (_Jereme F,

Weynand President ef the Celleges )and

Dean Chance( Dean Truett L, Chance )

regarding Mr. Hernandez. I alse review
his transcripts and I am satisfied that
there is ne basis fer Mr. Hernandez's
cemplaints, which I se infermed him.

Mr. Hernandez ceuld net accept my epinen

that he could net pass judgment en himself

a53

with reference tehis grades. That he is
the student and it is the responsivility .
ef his teacher te grade him in his perferm
ance and net vice*versa, My recemmandatien
te Mr. “ernandez was that he apply himself
in achieving his geals werking harder in
his studies.
Mr. Hernandez's respense was that I had
been “ brainwashed " and had been ddazzled
with “geedies goedies", He accused the
cellege administratien ef being Ku-Klus
Klansmen and ef being guilty of white cel-
lar crimes and that justice had te prev: .
ail,
My feeling is that Mr. Hernandez seems te
have severs persecution complex. Orderari-
ly, I weuld net invelve myself in admini-
strative matters, hewever, I can under-
stand yeur pesitien.
I hepe that I have been able te be ef
seme heip te yeu in reselving yeur concern,

Sincerely Dan Martimez/ cc: Dr. Weynand.

Appendix 0 a54

Censerning Secialism and
Communism

Marx ,Kar1(1818-1883)

‘Karl Marx was a German ecenemist and
philosepher whose ideas have had an enorm
eus impact en the 20th cantury. Modern
Cemmunism has taken much ef its phileseph
y frem his theories.

In 1864 he founded the Internatienal ~
Werkingmen's Asseciation,later knewn as
the First International. In 1867 he publ
ished the first part ef his great work
Das Kapital (Capital), an analysis ef the
economics ef capitalism,

Ther are 18,000,000 union members in >
the United States. Seme 13,500,e0ee. ef
them beleng te AFL-CIO ( Keily AFB Laber
Unien is a member ef AFL-CIO) in natienal
and internatienal unions. Net all uniens
are asseciated with AFL-CIO. Certain °
uniens beleng te twe miner organizatiens-~

the Cenfederated Unien ef American and

Lue

a55

the Natienal independent Unien Ceuncil.
Other are independent. The mest impert
independent uniens are the Inernatienal
Bretherheed ef Teamstere (1.B.T.), with
abeut 1,400,000 menbers, and the United
Mine Werkers (U.W.W.A.), with a member-
ship ef around 600.000.

The new clerk ef the Supreme ceurt is

fermer GAJ., All petitiens since Suter
teek ever have been rejected,
If the clerk of the Supreme ceurt dees
net affort a ceuntry man an eppertunity
he dees net deserve te be the clerk ef
the Supreme ceurt,.

The military uses the FBI and CIA and
train them and equip them with especial
equipment,

The article centinues with a shert

adscussion ef the evelusien ef Marxist and

Leninist ideas cencerning the nature and
purpses ef law, Included is glimpse at

the centributiens of specified Seviet

suena

a56

schelars,
Seiet International Law teday:
By Majer Eugene D. Fryer**
JAGC, United States Army; chief, Interna:
tienal Law Divisien, The judge Advecate

General's,

Dept of Human Resourse ef Texas, repoen
se petitiener s writ of certiorari te
Supreme court mail certify, tecepy te
US Atty Gen. WDC.(th day ef July 1992.

p. 6 It alse centained 203 pages ef exhib
its,, an what appeared te be an entire
article (29 pages) entitle " The Wisdem
ef Cenfusiens,."

SEE alse Chinese Thaught frem confu. :
cius te Mae Tsetung by Herrlee G. Creel.
Title 29:(a) supervisor as Union members
Nething herein shall prehibit any indiv
jidual empleyed as spuervisor frem be

coming a member ef a Labsr erganizatien.

see Kelly managment asseciation intereste

parties in the out come ef this case.

Appendix P a57

See Directery Velumes fer Industrials, Bu-
siness Directery's, Hespital Persennel Di-
rectery's, Hetel Directery's Manufacturer's
Directery'’s etc's. See Baptist masen libr-
uians. At yeur lecal main library, Busine

ess and Science sectien.

Tne werld is mevei by tthe ligmt ef genius,

Gilliam,sent me a letter explain veur
FEO-cemplaint. see letter( light ef -
genius). befere,pre EEOC hearing.

Marx theught, the werkers weuld everthrew

capitalism and take pewer. They weuld then
werk te create a cemmunist state, in which
all the pesple weuld ewn the means ef pre-
ductien - facteries, mills, farmlands, and
the like. When the ideal had been reached,
gevernment weuld no longer be needed bec2-
use there would no longer be cor.flict bete
ween privilaged greups and these witheut
privilage,

See page 7 Hernandez vs Sullivan & the Tex-

as Dept. of Human Reseurces,. Brie? ‘er rese-

pendants, (Sullivan from nerthern states

en wee .

a58

New Jersey) page 7 It dees cite te ene case,
Hayes vs Irwin , The principle ferwhich th-
is case is cited is a mystery, hewever Hays
appears te be a business tert case, (respe~
nd fer defendant written by Feeney Jeseph
Patrick frem the nerthern states Indiana),
see civil war and Indiana,
pe 6 It alse centained 203 pages ef exhi-
bits.,.,», an what appeared te be an entire
article (29 pages) entitle “The Wisdem
ef cenfusiens."cc: te the ‘Supreme Ceurt
Justice Sandra O'cenner, Feb. 22,92.
see alse Chinese 1Theught: frem_cenfucius to
“Mae-Tsetung by Herrlee G. Creel.
New EEO Chief March 91: member of Mex.
Amer. Business and Prefessional club, On
1992 call EEO Chief Dera;abeut an EEO
pending at Pendagon, she don't knew
what to de.

In 1921,the Kleagis,the salemen ef the

Klan,in Texas were by the theusands.

Appendix Q a59

In August, 1864 Grant read ina >t. Le-
uis newspaper that tne president had made
him a brigadier gener:l.

Grant at Westveint: his recerd as a st-
ujent, was enlv aver-ge,

Grant wes in the battle ef Shileh in Tenn-
essee, in which the Unien and Cenfederate
lesses tetaled ever 20,000,

Grant captured the OCenfederate strengh-
eld in Vicksburg, Mississippi river.

It was a leng bleedy campaign, fer Lee
was a great general.

srant was bern in Peint Pleasant, Ohie,
attended scheel in Geergetewn, Ohie.

The Republican Party neminated Grant:
fer president: Schuyler velfax ef Indiana
was neminated as Vice-President.

Grant's first term as President ef the
United ~tates tried te annex the Deminican
Republic.

Grant's Vice-President in his. secend

term was Henry Wilsen efMassachusetts.

5
a
2]

a60

Genral Lee frem Stradferd, Virginia.
Cenfederate President: Jeffersen Davis,
(frem New Orleans) appeinted Lee as his
military adviser.

100,000 treeps under General Geerge McCe
lellan: at the battle ef seven days: Lee
sent General McClellan army realing back.

Grant, headed fer Richmend with an army
efwell ever 100,000 men. General Lee, with
enlv 60,000 men: Lee meved swiftly te step
him, All menth leng, the same fighting
went en; Grant lestalmos. oV,000 men, and

Les waif that number.

Appendix S a61

Stand Watie, Indain Leader, made cem-

mander brigate general by the Cenfederate

gevernment, Berm at what is new Reme Ga.

_

TENNESSER "NORTH CAROLINA

FLORIDA

Beundaries ef the Cherekee
Natien in 1831.

Sen ef Uwati and part cherekee Suannah
Reese, Was educated at the Missien scheels
He came te cemmand twe regiments ef Meus
nted Rifles and three battaliens ef Cher-

ekee, Seminele and Osage infantry that
feught in the Indain Territery, Arkansas
Misseuri,Kansas, and Texas,
His fameus fer his rele in the Battle >
ef Pea Ridge, Arkansag,in which his
treeps captured the Unien artillery pei-

tiens that were inflicting great damage-

en the cenfederates,

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386019_0908%3A1. Public record. Not legal advice.
