# Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ashkar v. Von Eschenbach > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386010_1313%3A1 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Petition for Writ of Certiorari - **Published:** January 1, 2002 - **Citation:** 537 U.S. 822 ## Text Supreme Court, U.S. P hap FILED™ 011802 JUN -4 2002 No. OFFICE OF THE ULEKK In THE SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES ASHKAR - Petitioner VS. VON ESCHENBACH - Respondent ON PETITION FOR. A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI GEORGE E. ASHKAR 61-37 BELL BOULEVARD OAKLAND GARDENS, NY 11364-2239 PHONE No; (718) 423-1112 ees _—— —_ No. In THE SupREME CourT OF THE UNITED STATES ASHKAR - Petitioner VS. VON ESCHENBACH - Respondent ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI GEORGE E. ASHKAR 61-37 BELL BOULEVARD OAKLAND GARDENS, NY | 1364-2239 PHONE No; (718) 423-1112 QUESTION PRESENTED for REVIEW CAPITAL CASE (Sort of) Introductory Statement Medical professionals do not have treatment to cure cancer diseases after 200 years of researches 1 am a Physicist | developed a treatment method Neutral-Infection Absorption to cure cancer disease with 100% recuperation and it was in use since 1943 | am offering my treatment method to, in general, medical professionals and , in particularly. to Director of National Cancer Institute, they are refusing to accept it, 280 million of United States Citizens deprived to have the treatment, as a result they are suffering and dying needlessly | am asking respectfully the Supreme Court that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment of affirmation, the dismissal of the case, by United States Court of Appeals QUESTION Can I go ahead with the case and force Director of National Cancer Institute to accept my NIA treatment method and use it in public? TABLE OF CONTENTS COUN WORE secnivniinicineiiciiadaiaiainitebibitalanas SITES PO wncicivncinssnbinilianiiecviiaenia 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ------------------------- 2 CONICS EIRENE nncicennccincensscnnsinanuidiiatianitens 6 INDEX TO APPENDICES APPENDIX A Decision of U.S. Court of Appeals APPENDIX B Decision of U.S. District Court No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GEORGE E. ASHKAR - Petitioner vs VON ESCHENBACH - Respondent On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgments below OPINIONS BELOW For case from federal courts. The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals at Appendix A to the petition and is unpublished. The opinion of the United States District Court appears at Appendix B to the petition and is unpublished JURISDICTION The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case was April 25, 2002. No petition for rehearing was timely filed m my case. STATEMENT OF THE CASE In 1977 I became Citizen of the United States of America, I was so happy I wanted to give back something to show my appreciation. The best thing I could give Americans was my treatment method, Neutral Infection - Absorption (NIA), which I developed in 1943 and it was in use since then and, which Americans badly needed to prevent and cure cancer disease. Since then problems started, introduce the treatment method to cure cancer became mission impossible. My all efforts to introduce my treatment method to medical professionals failed. The last resort was to explain my treatment method to director of National Cancer Institute (NCD), who is the only person in the United States responsible and have obligation to find a cure for cancer disease. To give an end to all of fruitless researches, that medical professionals were conducting for the past 200 years, and save millions of lives I asked the Director of NCI to participate in their seminar to explain the method to interested researchers, was denied. | asked to meet him to explain the method, he refused. I asked to publish my article, by sending manuscript about Mechanism Development of Cancer, in the CANCER journal of the NCI, was denied. I asked to use my treatment method(NIA), which I sent to him, was denied also. Here also the last resort was to invite him to court house to explain him the science of medicine so on January 29, 2001 I filed complain in the United States District Court Eastern District of New York to start the civil case against Director of NCI. I needed him for only one hour to explain the method, instead he is spending days and weeks in library digging in the Federal Rules and Regulations to find excuse to refuse the meeting. If the meeting takes place I promise I will not lynch him instead I will explain scientific research of medical problem and introduce my NIA treatment method, which can cure all kind of non viral - bacterial diseases, caused by particles and 4 chemicals, like rheumatoid arthritis, breast and skin cancer with 100% recuperation and it was in use since 1943 and never failed. Unfortunately Honorable judge John Gleeson of the United States District Court Eastern District of New York, siding with defendant and ignoring my explanation on August 8, 2001 made a poor judgment and dismissed the case (Appendix B). Another poor judgment was made on April 25, 2002 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by affirming the dismissal of the case(Appendix A). | Having in consideration that the work of the federal courts touches upon many of the most significant issues affecting the American people, and federal judges exercise wide authority and discretion in the cases over which they preside. Since no one Constitution or Federal Rules are complete and perfect, the Founding Fathers of the Nation considered an independent federal judiciary essential to ensure fairness and equal justice for all citizens of the United States and created oral argument to solve the problem, which could not be predicted in advance. Now you have choice to defend one person, Director of NCI, or 280 million Americans, if you feel that Americans do not deserve to suffer, have miserable life and die, go ahead and grant the writ of certiorari to save their lives. If you are here to seek justice for all citizen of the United States I am giving you the chance to show your intention. By doing this you will not violate any Rules since you are defending 280 million Americans’ right against one person's, director of NCI who is keeping US Citizens hostage, depriving them from having treatment to prevent and cure their cancer. Despite I am the litigant, I am doing this for you, for American people except me and my wife we have the treatment you don't. If I win you, American people are the winner, you will get the treatment. If I loose you, American people are the looser you will not get the treatment. Finally I want to make it clear that activity of the NCI based on lying to the Federal Government, lying to the American people and lying to each other about "success" of 6 cancer researches, proof of that; after 200 years of research results are ZERO. For the benefit of the world population and particularly for the American people United States Supreme Court should get involved actively to solve the problem as soon as possible without any delays. If the problem is not fixed now, soon Americans will face even more disastrous problem in the near future, practicing of genetic therapy, which does not exist but this is good case for charlatans to make a lot of money by killing people. CONCLUSION Finally I respectfully asking the Unitd States Supreme Court the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted. We are at dead end, threament of cancer is sinking in the swamp and no way out, I am getting older and getting tired if I do not fix it now nobody will, fix it now or never. Dated Oakland Gardens, New York June 2, 2002 Respectfully submitted Gesrac t. (deter, George E. Ashkar, PhD. --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386010_1313%3A1. Public record. Not legal advice.