# Record and brief — Supreme Court Records & Briefs 1935 Full Opinions > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386009_0262%3A0 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Record and brief - **Published:** January 1, 1935 ## Text SUPREME COURT RECORDS & SRIEFS . | 1935 FULL OPINIONS CITATION a THE FFD: 296 U.S. ] ‘Douglas v. Willcuts Mae | ; 1 oS 5 10 Borax, Ltd. v. Los Angeles ar ae sz 8 6 68 27. Graham ).. White-Phillips Co., Inc... ae ee, 33 Atlanta, B&C R. Co. us U.S. ae 9 10 39 Helvering v. St. Louis Trust Co. 25 | “a 53 Chandler:Co. v. Brandtjen, Inc. | a 60 Raybestos-Manhattan Co. Vv. U.S. os : 20 i) 64 Ot Giovagni v. Camden Ins. Assn. See 14 Becker fo. v.. Cummings . | | | ee } (4 85. Helvering v. City Bank Co. | 10 : "3 93 Helvering v. Helmholz pies | ‘14 or 98 White v. Poor. ee hi, - eB. | 102 McFeely v. Conmisbioncr | 24 16 " 113 Schuy]ki1] Trust Ca. v. Pennsylvan 3 7 133 American surety Co. v. Electric -Co. 12 5 141 Vutaiineds ve’ Furland , “1 176 Pacific States Co. v. White 5" 189 U.S. v. Hastings 3 .* ~~) 200 . General Utilities ”Co. v. Helvering 5 a 207 Fox Film Corp. v. Muller 6 sae FJ . eh, ° , ‘¢ 8 we | 4 ‘SUPREME COURT RECORDS & BRIEFS 1935 FULL OPINIONS ;. ‘ ' ’ “4 : . \ Ne Dn © FF wW ‘CITATION —__ are —— et 296 U.S. 211 “Bingham vy U.S. | a, t 83 5 | 220 Industrial Trust Co, v. US / hae | 213 ie om 222 Alexander me Hillman / } 15,16 8 244 Klamath Indiansv. U.S. Bo S ies — 256 ‘Willer ve. Irving Trust Co. 67: 3 ‘ 261 Clyde Mallory Lines’ v. Alabama 43 3 268 Milwaukee County v. White Co. “32 3 286 ‘Del Vecchio v. Bowers 37 5 287 U.S. v. Constantine 40 ‘: 299 U.S. v. Kesterson 46 2 300 Hulburd v. Commissioner 39 : 315 Hopkins Savings Assn. v. Cleary 55. 4 344 Morrissey vs Commissioner | 17 6 362- Swanson v. Commissioner 108 | 4 365 Helvering v. Combs 238 a. 369 ‘Helvering v. Colenian-Gilbert 78,79. 374. - Nelson Co. v. Helvering 61 378 Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co. 174 387 Helvering v. Watts a 184 389° G&K Mfg. Co. vt Helvering 187. 4 » @ "SUPREME COURT RECORDS & BRIEFS 1935 FULL OPINIONS | v TITAN * 4 - So rae “TITTLE . Patry . D . 296 U.S. 391 Bus & Trans. Corp. v..Helvering 490 Je 393 Hill v. Martin 193 20 404 Colgate v. Harvey | ne g 4 ____—459- Radio Corp. v. Raytheon Co. 127 5 463 U.S. v. Bank of New York Co. " 195 18 48) U.S. Trust Co, V. Commissioner 169 "Q7 488 Helvering, Commissioner of Internal 566 -'5 | Revenve v; McIlvaine | 489° Leag ve st. John, Trustee 54 4 % 497. Posadas v. National City pani 114 10 506 Commission v. Havemeyer* - : 115 521 Oklahoma v. Barnsda11 Corp. | ‘116 3 527 Chapman’v. Hoage *S\ 151 -- ® ; O é a J bas: é SUPREME COURT RECORDS & BRIEFS: y . 1935 FULL OPINIONS : , CITATION ——— —__72__gASE & __# CARD 297 U.S. 1 U.S, v. Butler ee 88 U.S.'v. Safety car Wedting | Co. VA ; ;. a 4 P 106 Hel vering v. Salvage. ae 173 7 / 110 Rickert Rice Mjlls ve Fontenot, 577: 43 114. Van Der Weyde Ve Ocean/Co. 4 - @ §. 121: Tyson v. U.Sz. ime 192. 4. 124 Gooch v. U.S. | 559 2 129- Manhattan Co. v. Comm. 226 7 135 Great.Northern Ry.. v. Weeks 178 ee ae 157 -U.Sy v. Atkinson + 265 7 160 Meyer v. Kermore Hotel Co. ' 375,376. 7 - 167 Dismuke v. U.S. 199 a 175 U. S. v. California : | 33 *, 189 Treigle v. Acme Homes tead Assn. 287 an 198 Prudence Co. v. Fidelity. Co. 270 22, 209 Baltinore Nat. Bank v. Tax Comm'n, 283 "3 216 Duparquet Co. v. Evans” 533 4 225 Tuttle v. Harris wg -2C~ws 227 Palmer Clay Co. v. Brown, 125 3 230 me. Brass Co. v. Irving Trust Co. 4 232 SUPREME COURT RECORDS & BRIEFS -1935 FULL OPINIONS *. - COTATION” CRE ARETE # CARD 297 U.S. 233 Grosjean Vv. American Press i. ae - 303 be | 251 Borden's Co: v. Ten Eyck ia 597 10 266 Mayflower Farms v. Ten Eyck - 349 40 278. Brown v. Mississippi . 301 7 288 Ashwander v. Valley Authority 403,404 53 Zs 373 Lincoln v. Ricketts | 348 6. 387 Appliance Co. v. er Co. 356 9 398 Southern Ry. Coe v. Lunsford 399 8». 403 Pacific Tel. Co. v. Tax Comm'n, baa 34 420 Leahy v. State Treasurer Ne 599. "2 422 Bayside Fish Flour Co. Vv. Gentry 2:° 4 “431 Whitfield v. Ohio 377 7 441 Matson Nav. Co. v. State Board 346. 6 447 Penn, R. Co. v. 111. Brick Co. é 360° 9 * 464 Callaghan v. Receiatr. Finance Corp. 539 Vy "471 N. W. Bel] Telephone Co. v. Ry. Comm, 350 9 481 Noble v. Oklatioma.City — 335 10 - 496 Helvering v. San Joaquin Co. 379, "- 500 Terminal Warehouse ve Penn. R. Co. : 351 17 530° U.S. v. Rizzo 272 9 “Ue & W. Ry. Co. v. No. Carolina. "SUPREME COURT RECORDS. & BRIEFS 1935 FULL. OPINIONS CITATION _ 7 — , -” 297 U.S. 542 W. Power Co. v. Comm’ r, oP ee 525 5 | 553. Sugar Institute'v. U.S. 268 - 66 613. , Commonwealth Co. v. Bradford 22 4 620 Georgia Ry. & El. Co. v. Decatur... . 625 6 626 Bingamon v. Golden Eagle Lines. an 520. ‘5 629 Phil Tips Petroleum Co. Ve Jenkins " 386 7 638 Triplett v. Lowell 388 28 7 650 Fisher! 5s Blend Station Ve Tax Com'n, 628 - “4. y 657° Internat. Steel Co. v. Surety Co. a 5 “666° Asiatic Petrol Co. .v. Collector 674 5 672 ~N.Y. Life. Ins< Co. ve Viglas 602, 3 682 610 19 . SUPREME COURT ‘RECORDS & BRIEFS 1935. FULL OPINIONS Carter v. Carter Coal Co. — 298:U.S., .1Jones v. Securities Commission 640 10 oa 38 St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. U.S. 497 28 94 Hines v. Stein : 659 4 _- 99 “Chicago G.W.R. Co. v. Rambo 696 8 105 U.S. v. Idaho | 420 10 - 110 The Arizona v. Anelich 667 12 “124° Beadle v. Spencer 676 6 : 131 International, Machines Corp. v. U.S. 758 eet “141 Tipton v. Atchison Ry. Co. 64 Citi 155 Hartford Indeninity Co. v. 111inois 692 4 160 Lowden v. N. W. Nationa? Bank 743, ‘4 167 Zimmern v. U.S. ae 766 4 - 170 Penna, °R. Co. vs P. Us Commission . . 746 Ae ’ 178 McNutt vs Genera’ Meters & c. Corp. 709 6 . 190 McNutt v. McHenry & c. Co. | no.) § 193 “Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox 663 5 217 Compagnie Generale v. Elting 6 5 ~~" 226 Premier-Pabst Co. v. Grosscup 745 6 229 Wallace -v.° Cutten 747 15 238 636,651, 73 649,650 ° apneit COURT RECORDS & BRIEFS 1935 FULL OPINIOMS 298 U.S. 342 HcCandless v. U.S. 552 9 5. 349 BI & 0. Re Co. ve US. poe 393 Graves v. Texas Company 727 1 “407. Morf v.Bingaman: 772. 6 415 Bassick Co. v; Hollingshead Co. 23° 31 426 Acker v. US. 655 33 435 U,S. ve Goeth 656 A 441 KoshYand v. Hel vering 774 6. 448 Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Co. 767,768 - 26. 460 ‘Hill, “warden V. Wampler - 947 2 468 Horgan: ¥. US. 686 31 483 U.S. V. Atlantic Sent cot ai 3 492 U.S. v. Elgin; J. & E. Ry. 660 16 513 Ashton v. Cameron County Dist. 959 12. 544 U.S. v. Knott a 643 10 553 Atlantic Lumber Co. v. Conmiss ioné 715: 4! ~~ 587 Morehead v. N. Y. ex rel Tipaldo- 838 "15 .s rr -! a . Ls \ --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386009_0262%3A0. Public record. Not legal advice.