# Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shlishey the Best, Inc. v. Option One Mortgage Corp.

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386006_0974%3A1

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Petition for Writ of Certiorari
- **Published:** January 1, 2011
- **Citation:** 563 U.S. 987

## Text

Supreme Court |}

ae wa BO

Florida Bar Re: Amend. to Rul

Jud. Admin. Rule 2.050 (Time Star

193 So.2d 423 (Fla. 1986) (Ehrlicl

ry ,OrTPrreprecr ly
4 : |

~. ‘
T ae | y t
VAL ft A i
7 ‘
i 1¢ A Tt
»
IS & NET oa | (
T }
} > » QE +
: ? | >
ior t ¢ >
> ( |
= } 45 CT
ia I iJ T)
‘ 1 s
{ ++ ; 2) ? rm
‘ LLL@ I i Pit ‘ i ‘
‘ } } ‘ »ON " OO |
:
j . ‘
Ney lads |
—~ i. ORG (I

GB &, rt {Hl

} ™ |
LICharaGasO! \ ( I
R ‘ }
Vianhattan Bank

U.S. v. Jame

Real Property

T @ 4210
AIO US

z

In The

SUPREME COURT OF THE!

Shi
for a writ of certiorar}
Second District Court
per curiam, the orde}
Judicial Circuit, &

ine Up!

Appeal of Florida (App

Circuit Court of the

: ment f ‘
\] r timel | t i rid) i | | [ |
CFict ¢ ! Ol appeal ¢ ered raer ienv!}
he i} lyecembe? (pit) LAD] | ]
florida law, the “Per Curia \ffirmed’ de )
raer denying rehneal p iy not! ppt ed
I Orjaa Oupi ne TWourt I d ret DPpCa I
powel R. J. Reynold 'obacco (
Qe} gq US (| } ZOOA) he wy) dict
his d

PrIFICATION OF POSSIBLE APP!

OF 28 U.S.C . §2403(b)

INSTITUTIONAL AND STATI
PROVISIONS INVOLVED
\.mendament Criminal!
concerning nro

ymmpensati

Amendment AIlV

f law — Equal protecti

}
ri!
q+fror tn 4) Nerrty ri ) ) }
r |

‘ umed L( a1 ulitie L COl ide} } ror
} Dp ri } rvé lect | | ( Beat !
r ape LT } qd tf | ) é
rtitt iL | | ¢ Ot L] [ I

rey Tre objecti nal I ‘ '
! ice | nec | | ( 1 ) I
t alfect loud pul

nne rc ;
igment |

1eTicie)

lorida Rules o

Mistakes; Inadvertence; Excusable Nep

wiv Discovered Evidence; Fraud; etc. © mot

}

‘ } ‘ , ‘ ‘+ 3
" ma Upof? i¢ erm a re IS] ‘
i p) rt | i¢ ' ‘ 7
|
rlaal | eni lit
‘ ' } 1 ¢
}
é y r '
Dri ( ‘
I
Tv ' {
+ ia
.
| .

perce

WS

Nas <¢

.
A

Lor

nlike

*

oud

co
~~
+]
oI
—|
oe!
+]
a?)

Florida's “PCA” system and
shifting of the burden to thi:
Court for second tier revie'
in}
Denials of
are supposed
So why are we
Florida
severely restrict
Constitution
rights are infringed b

and the first. and
the Florida distri
the only pla

SLI pre meé

dramati

experienced

part of the

So.2d 1356

accomplish

amendment was to stop

called in the local parlancs
AF FIRME!I

é

—r" ”
4 - a

\Jrdae

Motion to V

] ‘ ‘ort Tit

2

aS A Aiv¥ia A
I A IN ¢ ; M ) rih¢ YN A N\

NmmMxrz «eT?
rEeRM

riit VN UJINE VLOK LG
CORPORATION: DEBOR
EMMET DOUGLAS: JOHN DOI
DOE AS UNKNOWN TENAN

\?

OSSESION

Vermeer

‘

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THI
STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND SITRICT, POST
OFFICE BOX 327, LAKELAND, FL 33802-0327

CASE NO.: 2D09-458

> Y\r7 fA +
()()'/ -¢ ,-()]

IB R-S

1) Y
Appellant/Petit

BY ORDER OF THE COUR

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TH!
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND F'
‘ARASOTA COUNTY. FLORID
CIVIL DIVISIO}
felnehie NE =

LPC JR. ATIO

EBORAHE DOUGLAS; EMME’
DOUGLAS; JOHN DOE; JANE DO
AS UNKNOWN TENANTS IN
POSSESION OF THE SUBJE'
ROPERTY,

Defend

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [TO] VACATE
CERTIFICATE OF SALE AND CERTIFICATE OF
TITLE

THIS MATTER
tiff Option One Mortgage Corporation's Motio:
Vacate Certificate of Sale and Certificate of Tit]

id the Court, having heard the agrument of t!

: roel on bl 7 | ape, eee nenne os
rties, reviewed the file, tne relevant case [aw al

Ons
proceedings |
Ganon, Krevan
Hollywood,
foreclosure |
Marshall _ {
Lauderdale, Florida
Shlishey The Best

¥

by Georg:

i

AV}

» set aside tl
and certificate of title pursual
of Rule 1.540(b), Florida Rule

wal

articulated by the Florida Su

;

1e roreciosuré

? i. ney Fe,
Buchanan, 190 &

Option
telephons
hearing tt
appeared
judgment of {
no defendants

Watson Firm

proces 1ed

i *foa¢ + T
presen

100.00

and shghtly mor

Option (ne

1?

in dequate an

lute:
foreclosure file
logged into
r> P

tr ioca

peen Into thel

‘he pending sale date wot

n the case management
Jennifer Lipovsk:
received an email from Sue

handling the firm's post judgment

S|

her that she had just paid and inv
sale in the Option One case bu
ale date had not been entered
Lipovsky immediately checl
docket for Sarasota County

Judgment had been filed and recorded

23, 2008, with a sale date of October
Clerk's docket also showed that

recorded on Novemeb«
n contacted the Sarasota
confirmed that the

j

d ORDERE!

“ ertan —
rected tN)

AA

'T’ # Ah

( l4/Z39 1!
1008 NOV 7 01:59 PN
KAREN E. RUSHIN(
THE CIRCUIT COUR’
LASOTA COUNTY, FLORID
POMERT FE 1ITNOKEF

sist.

> me
EK, Receit

+t
Via

EXCERPTS

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40386006_0974%3A1. Public record. Not legal advice.