# Brief for Respondents in Opposition — Redwood v. New York

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385606_0090%3A1

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Brief for Respondents in Opposition
- **Published:** January 1, 1971
- **Citation:** 404 U.S. 1003

## Text

pene Cent tte

October Term, 1971

No. 71-53

JUNIUS REDWOOD,
Petitioner,
agamst

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
Respondent.

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the New York
Supreme Court, Appeilate Term, First Judicial Department

BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT IN OPPOSITION
TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI

Frank S. Hocan
District Attorney
New York County
Attorney for Respondent
155 Leonard Street
New York, New York 10013
(212) 732-7300

MicHazt R. JUvILER
Lewis R. FrrepMan
Assistant District Attorneys
Of Counsel

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
ce | RIERA Sean AT Na 1
rr CS i es 2
Argument
Petitioner’s motion is untimely, as the New York
Court of Appeals properly dismissed his appli-
cation for leave to appeal oo...0...0.ooooooccccocecececeee by)
Point 1!—The petitioner’s right to a trial by jury,
as interpreted by this Court’s decision in Dun-
can v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968), was not
infringed, and Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S.
66 (1970) should not be applied retroactively to
Be WI ca vcrcchatcansnieninancee bien ianencaie cae: 7
NI es Soccer ke er eee Te 14
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases:
Arnold v. North Carolina, 376 U.S. 773 (1964) ............ 7
Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) ................ 8, 9, 10,
12, 13, 14
Banks v. California, 382 U.S. 420 (1966) 0.00... 7
Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 (1968) ooo... 10, 11
De Stefane v. Woods, 392 U.S. 631 (1968) 0.0.00... 9, 10
Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244 (1969) .............. 14
Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968) .................. 8
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964) 00000000000... 13, 14
Fuller v. Alaska, 393 U.S. 80 (1968) 2000.0. 14
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) ................. 13, 14
Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965) ...000............. 13
Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 (1966) ................ 13
Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964) 0000. 13
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) .................. 13
People v. Dargan, 27 N.Y. 2d 100 (1970), cert. denied
400 U.S. 920, reh. denied 400 U.S. 1002 (1971) ...... 9
People v. Donaldson, 25 N.Y. 2d 38 (1969) .................... 12

People v. Fuller, 24 N.Y. 2d 292 (1969) 000.0. 12

A A TS TS ES a SE SS aE TT a NN Te 5

II

PAGE

People v. Kaiser, 21 N.Y. 2d 86 (1967), aff’d 294 U.S.
| __ R i a aen et ve crt ge em _ 14
People v. Lopez, 28 N.Y. 2d 148 (1971) aise. oat 8
People v. Morhouse, 21 N.Y. 2d 66 (1967) ................ 14
People v. Tannenbaum, 23 N.Y. 2d 753 (1968) ............ 14
U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) 200. .

U.S. ex rel. Butler v. Thomas, 440 F.2d 992 (2d Cir.
1971), reversing 319 F. Supp. 524 S.D.N.Y.
1970), cert. denied U.S. —— (19/12/71) .... 9

U.S. ex rel. Farmer v. Kosan, 440 F. 2d 1256 (2d Cir.

ees Len a enersdceeceinetsirs 9
Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967) oo... .. 14
Smith v. Mississippi, 373 U.S. 238 (1962) 2000000000000. 7
Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) 000. 13

Statutes and Rules:
N.Y. Penal Law:

N.Y. Vehicle & Traffic Law:
ee ipa c ia ooscensnokees Core wmenavusirrages 8
dal oS hasnowntroraxtaten session 1, 2,3

N.Y. City Criminal Court Act:
ie lace steht So IANS 2 ene a ane a Ee 2,7

28 U.S.C.:
gles EEE ACTOR ne HOC ENON 5

U.S. Supreme Court Rules:
ssn aad cbesveecci bemnchaereiarnonereenisiatanriry 6

ree eemanrs

IN THE

Supreme Court of the United States

Ocioker Term, 1971

No. 71-53

$<

Junius REpwoop,
Petitioner,
against

THE PEOPLE OF THE StTaTE oF NEw Yorx«,
Respondent.

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the New York:
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Judicial Department

el -~ 9

BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT IN OPPOSITION
TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI

Preliminary Statement

Fetitioner Junius Redwood seeks a writ of certiorari
to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of the State
of New York, Appellate Term, First Judicial Department,
rendered May €, 1970, unanimously affirming his conviction
of the crimes o1 assault in the third degree [N.Y. Penal
Law $120.00] and driving while intoxicated [N.Y. Veh.
& Traf. L. §1192(2)].

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385606_0090%3A1. Public record. Not legal advice.