# Appendix — Board of Public Instruction v. Allen > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385605_0959%3A1 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Appendix - **Published:** January 1, 1971 - **Citation:** 402 U.S. 952 ## Text SUPREME COURT, U. S. CISKRArT No. 749 SEP 24 Bio Supreme Court, U.S. FILED IN THE E, ROBERT SEAVER, CLERIC Supreme Court of the United States Ocroser Term, 1970 Boarp or Pusuic Instruction or Browarp County, Forma, a public body organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida; and Wiuu1aM C. Dratner, Super- intendent of Public Schools of Broward County, Florida, Petitioners, v. Freperick ALLEN and TrmotHy ALLEN, minors by W. Grorce ALLEN, father and next friend; and Von D. Mrze.x, President of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and all others simi- larly situated, Respondents. APPENDIX TO PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT AND MOTION ; TO ADVANCE Cuar.es KE. PLepcer, JR. Piepcer & MAHONEY 925 Washington Building Washington, D. C. 20005 Wurm M. O’Bryan Fiemine, O’Bryan & FLEMING 1415 East Sunrise Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304 Epwarp J. Marxo Menvez, SHaw, Marko & STEPHANY 1040 Bayview Drive Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304 Attorneys for Petitioners Press or Byron S. ADAMS PRINTING, INC., WASHINGTON, D. C. SS, a INDEX Page Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law and Final Judg- ment of April 30, 1970 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Unreported .. 1a Opinion Yiled August 18, 1970 in the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, Not Yet Re- OE oho ek us'n.v 50005000 80e45n0 ee eeenie 32a Order of August 28, 1970 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Unreported .. 47-. School Superintendent’s Implementation Report of August 24, 1970 (Attached to Aforementioned Or- Oe OE A eu MOO kk cdo ch acakenecicerenets 54a Order of September 4, 1970 in the United States Dis- trict Court, Southern District of Florida, Unre- DONG scncdeccuckdas sxnnuennsaunenasnsateee 99a la APPENDIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA No. 70-31-Civ-TC Freperick ALLEN and Timotuy ALLEN, minors, by W. Gzorce ALLEN, father and next friend; and Von D. Mize.1, President of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and all others simi- larly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Boarp or Pustic Instruction or BROWARD County, Forma, a public body organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida; and Wiuusm (. DRaINneER, Superintendent of Public Schools of Broward County, Florida, Defendants. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Final Judgment FINDINGS OF FACT This school desegregation suit was brought b> the father of two public school students and by the president of the Broward County Chapter of the National Associa- tion for the Advancement of Colored People against the Board of Public Instruction and the School Superintendent of Broward County, Florida, alleging, inter alia, denial of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The defendants operate an urban school system of 116 schools and more than 112,000 students on the Florida ‘‘Gold Coast.’’ The school sys- tem is growing at a high rate (8.1% from September, 1968, to September, 1969), consistent with the growth of the county, which is said to be the fastest growing major county in the nation. Jurisdiction vests in the court under 2a Title 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. The suit was filed on January 9, 1970, and the first hear- ing was held on January 16, 1970, on the application of the plaintiffs to restrain the defendants from maintaining a dual system of public schools segregated by race and to compel defendants to formulate and operate a unitary integrated system of public schools. This is the third such suit filed against the school board in this court, though the two earlier suits resulted in nothing definitive. One, styled Gay v. Board of Public Instruction of Broward County, No. 67-725-Civ-CA, was dismissed on March 10, 1969, by consent of the parties, prosecution of the suit having languished. The other, styled Hattie Hall, ete., v. Board of Public Instruction of Bro- ward County, No. 10,820-Civ, was filed June 16, 1961, and dismissed June 13, 1962. At the January 16, 1970, hearing in this cause, the de- fendants admitted and the court found by its order of January 22, 1970, that they were not operating a unitary integrated school system but were operating a dual system of public schools segregated by race. Such dual systems, organized and operated by the states acting through local school boards, were held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483, 74 S.Ct. 686, 98 L.Ed. 873 (Brown I), and which were or- dered abolished in Brown v. Board of Education, 1955, 349 U.S. 294, 75 S.Ct. 753, 99 L.Ed. 1083 (Brown IT). In Green v. County Geet TE . CALNILONd OHV LuISHa NOTLWOANT Lsaqss EpyAoTA ‘otepszopnoy 3203 ._ 90243S Yih SsonygNdg OZET ROTLOOUISNI OI1GNd0' avVOE ALNNOD axviOND 27a 20 6b v6p 10 S~l $4332 0 0 to | es fees 0 Ts | a0) v9 Ties 1 1 SlonIp” $s8 Ose Z3°€T | 924 = | OT? 99 | OT | Z6 HL | 2ep 696 7} £9 9-1 fp Wed purlyeg” 069 059 %6°9T | 299 oss ‘CIT | S-T | 2B°S = [2z9 €€9 1 6 9 f -PPES UOT 022 024 Mz°t | €6€ 1cz col fF 9-t | Z0°OOL] 129 0 29 [9-1 Pp WOT NTT 022 022 %0 89 | 89g 0 S-1 | 0 00S 00S 10 S-1 dye] dou ” 01S Oey 20 C0? C0? 0 ee oop 8p =f 0 S-k YOOMGHOPCS; 02S 02h #£°8 | 299 169 SS 9-L | xv°OL [205 OSp = J2s 9-f $9323S3 pZOTT- 005 03y %0°OOT | 268 0 268 | S=t | %0°00L | 262 0 LOL 9-1 +A Als ULOoUyT” [ose oak ae et | 098 a ear) erates tas on 7 UapTT 0€6 082 70 999 1499 0 S-l | ste {E56 66 {02 of A SOUR ST epapiey- ~f Ozel 022 Z0°O0i} SOL = Jo vSOL {9-t | ZO°OOL fEzet 0 elet f o-t OLepysey O6¢ OSE %0 982 =| 982 0 S-~ | 40° ose Ove “40 9~t Sf FAG Ozp 00e % gee eee 0 SL | 20° SLE ee fo 9-1 » OL Epo GLH i 009 ObS £0 865 26¢ 0 S-L |49°0 264 St = fe 9-1 Pocrcdp3 © ALTOVEVO) ALIOVAVD }osZex $f Ter0y,] ary |oxBey |sopezo} oa8oy $]__ TROL | OITA |oaTay [sopeae q0011D8 da} KORIXVH TWHEON TL6T-CLET pojvaloag OLET-G96T QuUaszagz Aaequawayy OL6T ‘TT Avenaqay CALOIPOA ANY INSSTSd NOTIVYOSINI wnacnss - PpTxoTy Soyepszopney qu03 FOONTIS YIy ZoonyQnos OZET NOILONUISNT OLTANd JO CYVOU ALNNOD GuYKowa eo. soZed {tT 30 9 .o8eg 26 | szotsz joos'tz {uo*ze | eettez | ozz‘er Loy SO°CE | SnS*ns | ess*oT) SHBSL " TRROL-Gns 2 | ote 0%L $0 Ss ess {0 S-t | se°O | 902- [hoz z 9-1 SOUT UOT Tt OSL O&L $9°€t] BLL S6S |} eT S-T } $h°O | OzZ 7 9-T * SUUStey poomasay T OSL O2L ~0°OOT | €eZ 0 €eZ 9-7 $00T | Tsz 0 TSL S-T ~- p SoA 0 OL OL “0 829 879 10 S-t } $0 SOL SOL” 0 S-T t S2PTTIA 0 se) ie] $0 0 : 0 0 S-T Teopcouy © | ots O8h ne BETZ ezn 10 S-T | $0 STS STS 0 9-T TaysoT UaysasS” 0 O24 Ot 40 8S" ees {0 $-T | $0 OL 002 0 9-T sosuNs 3 0 | oe OeL a oe a a 125 | 9-t Peer BaRTONS sin 0 Ozz ee 6} ¢ss SZ weg 9-T | %6°26 | Zte LT 000 {9-1 BRT TEES 0 | ous }osn ue*t6 | 269 0S «eos o-t | asco | tea tie ot PPS RT 0 OtL 0%L gO°St {| Tés 99S Set S-T $0 663 663 0° 9-T pultdeayy z O20°T = J ots “0 c60*T |260°T Jo 9-T |} %0 eco'tT jevo't jo j st Pf Wha LOFALIURTA h oc93 009 ZL°UL | 622 €29 98 S-T %2°O hd €n9 T S-T : , Uofsequeyg 0 ons ooh $0 ats fats to S-t | $0 Ses {ses lo o-1 oipys ovpa eam | aLrovavol z1zovavo Joo2on ¢} tea03, eazay | oatox Soprag} oavoy g} te20z] ortyy | oaSoy foopeas nd i QVINOd) MARIAVA | TVIUON.. TLST-OL5T po ooloag . OLGT-S95T 3LvOS00g AUVINANATA OL6T “tt Aavnaqoyz CALOIOdd ANY INISAVA NOTLYUSAINT Lwanis epyTzoT7 *orepaopney q203 BOIS UI) RoaNNQNOS OZET ROILOONNISNI OLTINd JO axvod ALNNOD auvsoud ST ARC TREY Noes ett TR dato AAD ee PPT 29a soled 1t Jo 6 ofvg Bn Wao FY eteioey ose*t O24, 40 Ls9 Ls9 0 $-T eto] ozL 62 {Tt 9-T TeAQUOD poonATTOH OTL 029 “6°%4 722s 207 Oct SE} geet! ea9 46S 116 9-T PP orepevrrer OL Oth 40 | 002 oon fo 9-T] 4% [ O19 Jots do 9-1 “Fenaypeq” 0&6 OzL wee {| 279 || Les TS svt | an's| 012 eus Tee 9-T “f sancquasyy 006 OL 2 | 62 | oll To Sl $0 | S80 [sea To 9-1 P Poonasyae 035 o€s gz°2 | ass TS 0% S-T $e°L] ESS StS {Tr _ 9T oyAeg 026 OGL ze°8z) Iss S6E | OST S-T $E°S | Zs ese} 0% 9-T y; PpCUg wf OTs r) ZU°T | 91s oIs 9 S-T $6°0 | 9zs 1zs S$ : S-T f 4379 asc0s>— me 059 %e"S| O87 | Tz 607 “| S*T I~ soot | aan To Lit S-T Pp Suet ozo'T 4 OcL ZL°€z| 229 “Ly ~~ Si $-1 se | 6eL {zee te 3 , Seq OD 066 02k i 6l GOL He £99 [| 9-T $00 [sss 19 SS6 | 9-t A soqouoy aoAaeD 00¢*t 02% wo | £62 €64 0- ST $0 | zee een fo 8-T fp SIUFTOH Paeao nog” cts oo? %0°OS|- 28s £6z 96% S-— | %00T | 6Ss 0 6SS “S-t tS ounyyog OL OeL 10 [eso es fo s-t | $0 [ns tana lo” $-T Aased DV Vauv Hinos al | ALIOVaVS ALLOvevO oxton 3] Ter0y Sats J oasay [sopeco}| oxfoy ef} zeros} >27y | oxox Isopese s00H08 L402) KANIXVR | AiTON IL6T-OL6T poqoefoay OLGT-696T JUosoag OLET “TT Farnaqoz AUVINGNATS GILIALONd ANY INISIYA NOTLVYOALNI IIdaLs epraoTy Sortepaopney g203 R2OAS YY JSONYINOS OZET ROILOAVISHI OTE JO uvog ALNNOD GuvAONT so2ed Tt Jo OT 93vg T OSL OL 79°67} OFZ Szs | STz 9-T | $6°ET $09 Tes hO e-T x; SUTAIEY © | oss Ost $0 | S56 S66 | 0 9-t | 40 cos «6f e998 «10 3-T puyysung o 036 0%L %S°0 | hed 13 £ S-T | $2°0 9TL uTL {2 9-T ZuyTA33s ) Ose 0% 40 sso $sg 0 S-t | $0 T&L ToL 40 9-T sed Ueppaoys T Jo ) $0 seg $09 fe) S-T | $0 See sez. 0 9-T SITIN Urprseys OQ fort | oz i ati a i ws Teo°t | te0‘T jo 9-T | LA 9 Saute exoaqieg 0” | oze OZL $9°6t| 199 “ns | he g-t {| st*et | noe [tea fost o-t | xooag-sfurig 0 OSL OUL J} %2°ET} O49 £25 LIT S-T 1% h39 hes {0 9-T d¥prexvo & 0 O¢L COL ZL°Z | 029 £09 LT S-T 7 $2°0 nbd Ts3 ev Q-T | p,Ucicos SHOUT CAO;f aan uae O2L Zoot | 86 0 2 Fe TNE ARIAL LAA AISA TS. DORIS DS V9 ‘ ° De ae se SSE Aida |S co te ED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 30082 Frepertck ALLEN and TrmorHy ALLEN, minors, ete., et al, Plaintiffs-A ppellants-Cross Appellees, versus Boarp or Pustic INSTRUCTION OF Browarp County, Fioripa, ete., et al, Defendants-A ppellees, Buancugzé Evy Hien Scnoon Parent TreacHerRS Assoctation and IRENE S, CLARKE, Defendants-A ppellees-Cross Appellants. Opinion Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (August 18, 1970) Before Gewin, Gotpserc and Dyer, Circuit Judges. GopBerG, Circuit Judge: We consider here the plan of desegregation ordered for Broward County, Florida, by the district court.' The Broward County School System is a county-wide system serving a largely urban and rapidly growing area of the Florida ‘‘Gold “sast.’? During the 1969-70 school year the Board of Public Instruction of Broward County operated 115 schools to educate more than 112,000 students, approx- imately 77 percent white and 23 percent black. Under the 1This appeal was expedited in accordance with the procedures outlined in Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate Schoo! Dis- trict, 5 Cir. 1970, 419 F.2d 1211, 1222 (en bane), rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom. Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 1970, 396 U.S. 290, 90 S.Ct. 608, 24 L.Ed.2d 477. 22 REO. ORTOUE GS 4 a | Sei OTE 33a Board’s projections for the 1970-71 school year, 116 schools will educate more than 118,000 students, approximately 78 percent white and 22 percent black. A substantial percent- age of the students in the Broward County system are transported to and from school by bus. The present desegregation suit was filed by Negro plaintiffs on January 9, 1970. The first hearing to consider this action was held on January 16, 1970. As a result of facts adduced at that hearing the district court found that the Board was operating a dual school system. The Board was ordered to file by February 16, 1970, ‘‘a comprehen- sive plan to establish a unitary school system’’ in Broward County. The court suggested that the Board, in formu- lating its plan, consult with the Florida School Desegre- gation Consulting Center at the University of Miami. A plan was duly submitted, objections were filed with the court, and a hearing was held on March 3, 1970. At that hearing the court expressed the view that it needed more information to measure the plan against constitutional standards. The Board was directed to ‘‘consult and coop- erate with and accept the aid of’? the Florida School De- segregation Consulting Center in revising its plan ‘with special emphasis on eliminating the remaining all-black ele- mentary schools.’’? The Center was requested to make a re- port with recominendations ‘‘designed to assure a desegre- gation plan which meets the constitutional standard of a unitary system.”’ Pursuant to the court’s directives, the Board filed an amended plan and the Center submitted its reeommenda- tions. The principal difference between the two proposals was in their approach to the problem of desegregating all- black and overwhelmingly black elementary schools. The Center suggested use of school pairing as a means of de- segregating these elementary schools, but the Board’s plan rejected pairing. The plan submitted by the Board merely amended some of the discretionary zone lines which had previously been proposed. POI PT ET Oe A TP i ene ef ual iste A Sd ERE PALER DGGE ANNE LAP A LAL FEL Oe Fe PON 6 A ICAAGIOND 34a The court held a hearing on April 3, 1970, to consider the Board plan and the Center’s proposal. At that hearing the court heard the views of the Board, the Center, the plain- tiffs, and various parties who had been allowed to inter- vene. On April 30, 1970, the court entered its final order. With regard to the hotly disputed issue of student deseg- regation in the elementary schools, the court’s order re- jected the Center’s approach and accepted the boundaries of school attendance zones as proposed in the Board’s amended plan. From that order plaintiffs have perfected this appeal. An appeal has also been taken by intervenors, Blanche Ely High School Parent Teachers Association and Irene S. Clark. THE DISTRICT COURT’S ORDER With respect to faculty, staff, transportation, extracur- ricular activities, and facilities, the desegregation order entered by the district court on April 30, 1970, is unexcep- tional and is not challenged by any of the parties. Except for the problem noted in the next paragraph of this opinion, the order is in compliance with all of our Single- ton? requirements, including the requirement that faculty and staff members be assigned in such a manner that the ratio of whites to blacks in each school is substantially the same as the ratio of whites to blacks in the entire system.* The order further provides for a bi-racial com- 2 Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir. 1970, 419 F.2d 1211 (en bane), rev’d in part sub nom. Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 1970, 396 U.S. 290, 90 S.Ct. 608, 24 L.Ed.2d 477 (per curiam) (reversal limited to the issue of timing of student desegregation). * The court’s order also noted that the school board, apparently on its own initiative, had made plans to conduct an extensive orienta- tion program to prepare faculty and staff for the advent of de- segregation. We are inclined to agree with the Board that ‘‘[a]lthough Singleton did not require such an orientation pro- gram, obviously one is necessary if the unitary school system plan is going to work.’’ Brief of Appellees at 9. <> ay mrad 35a mittee of twelve members—six blacks and six whites—to be appointed by the court to make recommendations to the Board with respect to such matters as ‘‘the opera- tion of [the] majority to minority pupil transfer rule, the transportation system, and selection of school sites.’? The record indicates that this committee has been ap- pointed, and it is apparently functioning now. Although the parties have not put it in issue, we note one deficiency in the district court’s order. This deficiency has to do with the majority-to-minority transfer provi- sion. The order approves the following transfer rule: 1. Any pupil, with parental consent, shall have the right to transfer from a school at which his race is in the majority to the next nearest school at which his race is in the minority and the board shall fur- nish free transportation provided the distance in- volved meets state transportation statutes. 2. Other reassignment requests will be considered pro- viding the request does not involve the transfer of a pupil [from a school] in which his race in the minority to a school in which his race is in the majority. Fe Tee Pe My ht aR RN oe Ma RD aan This provision is not entirely in accord with our recent decisions. See Hightower v. West, 5 Cir. 1970, F. 2d -.-» ... [No. 29933, July 14, 1970, slip opinion at 14]; Carr v. Montgomery County Board of Education, 5 Cir. me, ... BB. ie 29521, June 29, 1970, slip opinion at 9]; Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, 5 Cir. 1970, ... F.2d ...,... fNo. 29332, June 8, 1970, slip opinion at 10]; Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District, 5 Cir. Wi, ... FF. 2d ..., ... [No. 29296, May 5, 1970, slip opinion at 11]. On remand the district court’s order must be modified to make it clear that (1) any pupil shall have the right to transfer from a school at which his race is in the majority to any school (not just the next nearest school) at which — PEATE te SA oh om 3 > 4 4 = 3 4 = a eS » 2 "1 % 5 Z T 3 JOL o1qeaaog] JucueMIEg “100K: 3 z SARZAP) ~ NVId NOILVYoasaa amAoudaV LUNOD LOIULSIG NUAWLNOS SSE VST ALD TRY LE PR ONE RM NE LORE ee TRE eT ee itt UG Gh dt Lelie tle ole teil PIL PRR PR ApS hs Ale eam ic Ree Pe NEAR PA Hn ER ESTES EA SOR IRD CIENT cite te ae, Ate S25 MYR Ye 79a 89°87 | 96€] 702] Z6T 9%€ | 707/261 z | 0 | ods} oztT os p 4 Z9°S% ESL] 114] 2 89€ 1602 | 6S1, SSE | ZOZ! Est 0 € | 069] 0 069 bei 69°0S 482] 88€]/ 66€ | TOL] O | tot] Iz€] 98t] sei] soe] zod cot 0 1 | OSZi O OSL 29:1] * YSeTs a IOll “UM | ATa | aon) -Un| ral “all UN] Tal “9OL] UM PALA AOL) UN “ATA] *IOL] “4a PAT | IOL] * um [ATA] *IOL [G4 1 ATA) ONe]] Ppv| 201] -aa0q) “waog Te os : 9 { $ 9 € Z 1 Py d1qe310g Ayyouce) | NVId ONIdNOUS/ONIYIVd GSYACYO LUNOD O61 ‘8ST LsndAV V :928uI9ITY i 9€61 . TOT 1z€ S9C 89€ See 96€ O10z ozI 0681 SIV.” ‘4 1% 0 16 |) iad Tit 601 601 ols OzI 0S7 DptS 2802 ot z99 0 8zT 92T SET TEI 9€1 069.0 069 OPTS 220N "i OT €€Z TOT 96 721 611 e717 1ST OsZ 0 osZ 201d yeI0L 9 S 9 € rd T x *30L 81qQeI20g) JusuewI2g = RL1DVaVO fa NVId NOILVYOASA AZAOUddV LUNOD LOIULSIA NUIHLAOS ~ “ELTA eee Ett] sve] OL] O POT fueE pre eT UT pee PET Tor Poe ost wi (SWZ | GET BMT /BNZ | O02) Case] OGt | Clee) Sivi sad bd ee : Py } | } i | 5 | | ' | . — t M — , : gs Go et a ——_— 4 ! 4 ng" | er | ghz) 002 | | | | | ig | ghz | 002 o2zL | 9 | Oe pt — l i 4 eae Sree | stig | 99") és€ hes Tz) O9t | MM | She! 6é6T os | o | oe fa oneee PST BOOTH SET Cat! -O [oot | woe SNe /eST TCT eee CIT 2 ams tay Ceol Oat | of | Feta can a — —_ — 9eTE ZT OL) "UM | ATE | IOL) “4M am "JOY UM] Ala] 30, UN | AIa, IL] UM Ala) JOLT UM | ATG | TOL] "UM | ATG |*IOL |" Um [ATG] ONPY] PPV] *IOL) ° 20d) “w2e¢ yor. me . 9 | S ” 4 € 4 1 ee | _ 21983200 Aqtoeded ¥ eycUrozTy NVId ONIdNOUD/ONIUIVd AIVACYO LUNOD 0/61 ‘BT LSNOAV u pees — = S | ee oot ger Tt tor 7] in ri Syyim | T OesSe = Og Ones SIV) 3 -— + = | oe | | sa. J 35 0 Tat got. | got got got Syyun Z Oel 0 Oe STOUT, UORTT a ' =| _ aie i 99 0 Het ort eT Zet OT syyum Z O@Z 0 oe2 STOUT, OTePICPAT] " ST $96 Oot est eit Oot 66t 002 Oz0T cet org PSUTitG Te20L 9 S % € z T | x [*40L e1qeri0g) ueuewIdg 700i lS | f Ali Svavy te NVI1d NOILVYOSSAd AZAOUddV LUNOD LOINLSIG NYaHLNOS AEE oe ae A eae he ta tanl PRC R RMS Pin pt NAT FO POE PELE SAFE GI OI IN Th IE SL Sey ee ee ee a ee 8la Bia RN AR TLCS ER, TRY Rad ane aA La ORS cael ithe dat end: pote q oY eed ‘TCE [BLET |ISTt] L69} vet | €z | IIL] Sve jezz |zzt | ece [ssz [ett] 69] vez] sz1l eze| eizioll lecelziz) ii € 1 josé6t| ozoil oce6 ivr: “9ce | cso | o¢e] tee 6ce | 6lzjoll [ec | diz] iit T | 0 | 069] ote | 08% wg ih ye 9°87 | 62% | 9vz] cez| vet} ez] 111] seelezz | zzt z 0 | ovs! ovs }o DTOT A se°ze | zm | 664 ez ee }ssz| sit] 69¢]e%2 | szt 0 1] oz] o2z | oS? MIST y% 20; iow 2 FOL MA PATE 30L) “Mey “AT al ION “UM Atal “3OL! “GM [Aral sol] UM| Ala] sOL] Ua Pula | aOL] UN PMT IOL TUN PTET OnE PPV| “20L] 210d] “Waa yay Pars . 9 ‘ea S ” € Zz T x 1 quaao0dg App ovdeg yi NV1d ONIdNOYD/ONIUIVd ATUIGYO LUND OL6T ‘gT LsNoAV V :ajeuzai1y 8c8I. "El Sve ele 69€ 62E Sze } OS6I OZzOT 0€6 STV). — + = i] a 299 82 Sz 771 €€l 91l 911 069 o1z | 08% $930ISq pAotty ya 7S 0 86 Tit Til f0l TOT 075 Ons 0 d10T3I0 baat 769 901 ZI 811 Cel O11 Tit | oed Oz 0S pueTs] "90y Tad [eIoL 9 ¢ ” € Zz T y “Jol, 81 qQeI10g] JuoUeuIEg 7100! -— i: RITdVvaVd = NVId NOILVYOESEd AZAOUddV Tanod LOIULSIA NYAHLAOS —_—_______ —___“gn 70° 1 $642 Hzvt |yzot litte | set] zt [sey [vez | vet | evr | sozjsct | ver | 8Szj9cT | Bzy | L9z| T9T [TEP | 697 |z9T 6 OT [06%z] O6€ | OOTZ Si 2) 09°LE 6S8 | 9ES|EZE aa zy | 29Z] TOT {TE | 697) 7Z9T 0 ¢ pez [0 OzZ $88. 3, . 20°09 41g | 92S} 1S¢ €%7| 89Z/SZT | 7€7 | 857] 92T 0 ¢ bel JO 022 ve OT, : gnuc «" 11°99 6SL | 607} OSE | TLE [SET] 9LT]8% | 722} PLT 6 © josot} O6€ | 099 £926 Weld BIOL) UA ALG] 20Ll “Gal Mra] sot) UNI ATS] “JOL] “YM PATS] “IOL] UM [Ata] IL] Ya PATE PIOL[ UM PATS | IOL | UM [ATA] «APL PPV] “IOL] * 320d) “29d sh ea . 9 S 9 € Zz ] I x a1qQe 10d Kayoedeg NVId ONIdNOYD/ONTUIVd GIUSACYO IUNOD OL61 ‘ST LSNOAV ‘yieqeuze3 3 : = VE eee oan ? nN S672 . Il€ 847 ev | eY 87% Te? 0692 06€ 00TZ ST¥s * a) Sel Z€1 Lz1 ZI gOT 11 Il - Oz 0 OzZ ssaade) 7°1 6EL 0 971 6E1 671 ZS €ST Oz 0 Oz yaerg anuox .y €°86 TEOT 6L1 CLI 9LT LL1 Z91 Z9T Osol 06€ 099 Me.) 21a peqoy 9 S 9 € Zz T y *JOL 81qe220g) YusUeWIIg Tool’ 3 a a RL1OVdVO ine NVId NOILVYOSSIA AHAONddY LUNOD LOINLSIA NYANLAOS 60°L€ L£% 97€ | STZ /9ZT | ZZE | 1Oz] 121 0; 0 |;02%; © 022 apr. 96°S¢ 969 | 9z7| zzz] doe |z1z} set ftse | otzi cer 0} |oze}] o | 07 | aezaurey L0°O? vs | 92] SIZ] 161/98 |Sot | Eselonz| ett 0/0 | 009] © | 099 | weyy-; 4Oelg *20 “UM “ad *20L) “UA “ATE *230. “UM “xaId *230L “UM “ald *JoL “UM “ald *20L “UM "ad *20L “UM “ald *I0L “UM “ald ax. Ppy *J0L *320, *wizd, a : 9 | S % € z I x O19eI 10d Ayzoudug 7 3 NVId ONTANOUD/ONTUIVd ATYACYO LUNOD O61 ‘ST LSNOAV V tazeuzea Ty fo @) 8061; [. 161 €SE 2% zze Loe IS€ 070zZ 0 0702 oe 0 829 0 921 O€l Sz1 €ZI 71 oz/ 0 vz Jeppe”, € 6c 789 601 Onl 11 66 ZIT €1l OzL 0 OzL MOT AWTI, ay: L139 4°) Te tor 86 Zt1 IT 009 0 009 weyyat s oe 7 yeIoL 9 ¢ 9 7 r I >: | *230L 981qQeI310g JuUsUeWIIg 1001 Y as b es ALIdvVaVD NVTI NOTLYNOAST EPANVEAY IVP) LotyIere Nvounuags c say | GOET | 889] 129 |eve Wal | 86 [Loc |SIl | 68 | 602 | SIT|T6 | 00% { SOT) Suj| Szzj cot} EzT| 9zz TOT zt satin g| - - peor 09 |0z9T SivLo Swrt7 | 8s9 Ola leve v7 | 86 |LOc [ell | 68 | 602 | STT|T6 satén zi] - . pec -09 |0zZ HOVE! ONYdik ~—“errzs]| TST] BOE) €7 Doz | Sol] S6| Sec | col, ezl|9zz jlOl | SzT saten y| - | - P06 | O {006 NYRZ109 owed 4% SOL UM PATE | 2OL) “UM) ATG) ° 307) “UN ATS] IOL] CUM PATE) IOL] UA PATH TJOLI UM PALA | IOL) UM [ATE | IOLA *ATG| PxeY] Ppy| IL) *320d *widd Ws r) | S 9 € Z T : 91qB3100d AqpoCasD NVId ONIGNOUD/ONTUIVd GAUSCYO LUNOD OL61 ‘8T LIsNoAV V GLYNUGLIV 4 ay 18 a 2 T0z S04 rey4 TI yds F $9 09 1 0291 : SivioL Te ee ee ty ett TIT FO OOt 66 . 082 09 | Oz HOVEd ONVANO | 301 214983204) Li. | TOOKIS = KLi1 dvav NVld NOILVYOUSIA GTAOUddV LUNOD LOIULsIa NUINLAOS 0 O22 : TL°89 6ELI6LE | O9E | EvZ|ZZT] T21] L2SZjOvT] LIT} 6EZI/LIT | 221 ueaeys: “0's O89} 7ZE | 90E LEZ] ECT) VOT] ZZZ] TZT} TOT | 122] O2T} TOT 4 0 O72 ing Hoe : *JOL] “UA PATA |°IOL) SUM] CATS] °IOT) SUM] PATH) CIOL] SUM PATA) ICL) *YM [ATA] “IOL] YM [ATA |°IOL] “UM PATA) IOL | UM [PATE] SAB PPV] “IOL} “320g “wag eons : 9 S 9 € Zz T x 21 qGe10g Aqtovieg cure NVId YNLdNOYD/ONIUIVd ATUZGNO LUNOD OL6T ‘8T LsNoOAV Vv :ejeuz9)"* 3 . | 6191 | £97 ATA : 6€Z LEZ 222 12 Ov7T 0 0771 SN. 0 [" St. €Il Oz1 | 08 66 Z01 O”s 09 08” aSpry outa “tl €LZ ; Z9T 89T LST €v1 €vT osZ OST 009 wuotszequeytg 7 "£6 OTT «OST 1st val ELI €LI 066 022 OzL $o303sq parsorg ey {CIOL 9 ¢ 9 € z T | “30L 9TqQujII0g] JuoUeWIOg 100i +: “ AL1OVaVO i NVId NOILVYOSSad AZAOUdAV INNOD LOINLSIa NUBHLNOS 90a zv"0” | 6107 jeozT|9TS “8t| 27% | Zt} Lev Sz |L9T | 76€ L7Z{L9T | Ti? | T9Z| OLT lETr | €vZ/OLT | 0922] 09 | 09TZ STV aR : 7 | 2 oz 9€ LoS | 67! 86T | est g1tis9 | est | 9Tt| 29 {TsT | S$Tt}99 0 10 O24 | o | oz yosur $0°9% 149] Z9€} 60€ j tz 601) Zot 822 | Szi €O1|zez | SZT| 707 z |o josz$ o9 | oz S3YET% | POON S* gs"se 108] 26%] 60€ Bt |Z7Z| Zl} L€7j0Sz at} oT? ocd | 0 | Oz ark Weld YW s0L, UA] Ala | 3OL! “Us| Mle, JON “tail Mia} “IOL[ is PAia| “IOL} UA jp Mia} -3OL *IOLp ua pp Ala; sok | AP LG SHEL PEV] SOLI *aa0d “Madd "oU. | 9 | S | 4 | € | 1 | XN | 91q@2I 20d Aqzordyg | NVId ONIGNOWD/ONIUTVd CEXUGYO LYNOD OL6T ‘ST LSNOAV @ :93eu2031y 6102 0 BE L197 6€ Il? €19 SITUN Z 0Zzz 09 0912 SuVvlod 0 es 0 911 (21 git yaa z11 : Oz 0 Oz qasuNs » a 3 4 6LL 0 C 6ST cst €%T 6S1 €91 ogd 09 Oz SIYSTO{ poonzs a; ” 5°96 1$9 0 Itt Sel Sel Tat PTat s3tun Zz | O22 0 Oz WIt, 1egrs 214 TeI0L 9 S 9 € z 1 x “Joy _eqearog| IWourw3z9g 1001.05 ” ALIOVdVS NVId NOTLVWOISTA AIAONddV LUNOD LOIULsId NYaNLNOS I ~ Ne ne ee ee 9la OTF 6ZL |lty lev WoT | 601; 38 (Zar | SOI; TS joor esl BS lool | Ill] oe t 0ez yaa ers ees a 917 [ete [lee BIT BETIS TON TS TOS eT 7) | co \vel leo | e9 7 loot Oot Ta P95 91S (991 lose 611 | ce | 28 joll | % te el [ly | Oo livl Tis | 06 z 0zz Oez wi . 0S €67 |lve [992 | 09| te |e | ey [vic lole : z 596 |087 | Oe “5 : itincke "30L] °GM [ATS |? OL) “Um “Atal “Io “um| "Aral -3OL) “Gm PTs) FOL] “UN [ATG] “JOLY Pala | Jol] UN| AIG] JOLT UMT MIG] ONO] PPV! "aOl! aaog) Uae, 31 qa 70d Ryzordey ae NVId ONTANOYD/ONTUIVd GTWATYO LUND OL6T “ST LSAOAV : @ :02eUI0II1V os + ‘ oo a —_ . Blel , 7€1 Sve ae 69€ 6z€ 8zE 0S6T OzOT 06 STVION. a) 299 82 SZl 771 . eel 911 911 069 O1z 08 so3e38g PAotT 0 72S 0 86 TI Mt col Tol Ons 0s 0 3101 30 ae 269 901 eet gil Szi oll Tit OzL 0Lz os? PUPTST 420Y 7h | 1830 9 3 9 € z T x *30L OT GUI20d) _ICOUUNIN Tool S i. RL OVavy a NVId NOILVUDSSIA AZAOYAAY TANOD LOIULSIG NYIHLNOS REN SF ge AN? PPLE REAL NEODOLE LOL LED RY ERM nae a De! SE ta eee Ne: 90° | $6%z [t wT igs ‘ rick aia mn", 2st est Oz 0 Oz yeaa anuo: > €°86 TEOT 6LT SLT 9L1 “Lt z91 z91 osol 06€ 099 aoa se1a. | 1eI0L 9 S 9 € z T y BTqeriz0d| + JUeueUIEg 7100 33 ae ‘ ALIOVdVD NVId NOTLVUOTSTA GAAOVAAY LYNOD LOLINLSIG NUNS CF BNL SAO i de BAMA BOSS ee AOR OED DA bt ei nA IL tA TEBE SOE NERA ELS AIRE PR La RON IEIE LAE tS RRS ARLE A CLE LIL AD LBA LASER AY BRA AER ER Tere Oey | LEAS ie MORSE hs CE I IIS UM CR —— 96a zo"ee | SO6T fILTT|ZE2 9g | Sot 0% oo | etzlozt | zze | tozi|tzt | cve | ztz| set [tse | vtz) “et 0 10 |ov0z| o | 0702 ‘ae ; The 789 601 Ovt Tit 66 raat Il Oz 0 Oz MOT AST am a | 565 78 78 Ol 86 zt 711 009 0 009 we 412. 214 yeqoL 9 S 9 € z 1 y TJOL P1qerjog| JuouLwWI2%d uD: » Tildvavo NVId NOTLVYOISTA AFAOUdaV LUNOD LOIULSIA NHANLAOS $6| Sc2 1 2Ot! €zt j9zz | tot] Sz 3tUn Y 0}; 0 |;OS9T}) 09 |0z9T ta BITS | Sy | Bory tHe OOZ ] SOT( SET Sez [OT] eet} Seq toil szt 0} 0 |ogz{ 09 | oz ¢ SoCe | SST | Ost) B22) 742 |FFT | BS | LOz(sit | 6s | 60c] etl] 16 S419 0} 0 {006} oO | 006 KV ~ ype "JOU MAP ATA} On! TAP La) “ION UA) Ata] TON] UN Pte] OL] UN PAL] “SOLD uN PaTe [P3OL) Ue NTA; IOL [UA [ATE] OXCY Ppa] “IOL[ a20gy “wIdg pis 7 : es ee 9 | . 4 € FA | I i 21 qe83 100 Aaporde) ries rad NVId ONIdNOYO/ONTUIVd ATYSCYO INNOD 0161 ‘81 LsNOAV @ ALYNY 117 bk : Fi « for) : . zee 60ET ze 102 60Z 002 Szz 922 PITYO"xa z | O89T 09 |. oz91 on." > a ‘ ad 89 SvT 6II 411 701 001 66 PITUO z 082 09 0zZ HOVE ONG ‘ E adaoxg ee “Tt 929 76 8 cA) 6 Set Zev TF 006 0 006 NYA 17" j TOI” ds qerr0d| UoueMses IG 32 "32 ” € z T x 14 zi é ante yeI0L 9 $s ALIOVaVO = - NVId NOILYUOESSA AZAOUddV IUNOD LOIULSIG NUTULNOS , * . = = 7 t v2 c6°97 =| Ble | SZ] 999] EvzZi ZZ] ZT) LSZjOMt | LTT | GCz Lit fzzt | Lez cet |ror | zzz 121 {tot iizz Oz1 {TOT | oj} jor} Oo | Ort si ae ; i | : ~go'sy | 089] velooc |. cez | cet}vor| zzz | tztiror irzz | ozt {ror ] 010 jor] o | ozd juarcuasea — f 7 - 4a rat 2'e7 | 6€2} 6LEfooe | eva ey 121] eszjomt | cit] 6e7 cn] zat | | of} 1 fem} o |% ans ~"YseTa yak UMP Mee | OL! “Mal ALG) SON) UN MIG) “TOL! UA PATA) SOL] AP Yin] “IOLA PMI | TON) TAT AEM) TOL] UN MLS) OMVY PPV] SOL] “Tao “AD TOO. ] 9 I S % € 4 Se: 2 ea | y Bi quiaod Sh ELE) AVId ONTANOWD/ONIMIVA GEYIAYO LINOD 0461 ‘AT LuNoAY @ iaaeureaty ivi Cre ise 6e ee ww. | w|hOUmdt over 0 ov 8 .VIOL ae Sh VASE, Mee eteeee. onsen ee: ccniaiemmaionn ie . aie a He ee 2 ees) Se se mS (ces ‘ vlianens Tt LO) Oe ee, ee oe eee Ai om oe “.COC:C*~«~SSt=