# Amicus Curiae Brief — Manhattan Cmty. Access Corp. v. Halleck, 139 S. Ct. 360 (2018) (No. 17-1702)

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385016_0833%3A21

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Amicus Curiae Brief
- **Published:** January 1, 2018

## Text

No. 17-1702

In Te
Supreme Court of the Anited States

,
-

MANHATTAN COMMUNITY ACCESS
CORPORATION, DANIEL COUGHLIN,
JEANETTE SANTIAGO, CORY BRYCE,

Petitioners,
Vv.
DEEDEE HALLECK, JESUS PAPOLETO MELENDEZ,
Respondents.

ee
Zs

On Writ Of Certiorari To The
United States Court Of Appeals
For The Second Circuit

ee
¥

BRIEF OF THE NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION AS AMICUS CURIAE
IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS

oa
¥

ELLIOT DOLBY SHIELDS CAROLYN A. KUBITSCHEK
ILyssa S. FUCHS Counsel of Record
ROBERT RICKNER LANSNER & KUBITSCHEK
NEw YORK COUNTY LAWYERS 325 Broadway, Suite 203

ASSOCIATION New York, New York 10007
14 Vesey Street (212) 349-0900

New York, New York 10007 ckubitschek@Lanskub.com
Counsel for Amicus Curiae

COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964
WWW COCELELEGALBRIEFS. COM

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
po FU Eee ‘ii
INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE.....................+. 1
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..........................045. 2
IEE titnnticenincenintceininsntadesuipernetnntanninsnusints 8

I. This Court should respect New York City’s
historic decision to create the country’s
first public access channels and designate

them as public forums ................0..000.0000000 8
A. 1965-1970: Manhattan’s initial cable
I ciesctcneniccesctetevinteenpeinensines 10

B. When New York City created the first
public access channels in 1970 it des-
ignated them as a public forum .......... 13

C. The cable companies’ operation of Man-
hattan’s public access channels under
the 1970 franchise agreements was in-
I cerininnceinsitetisintasesinn enieresiieiilitiansteiiniin 15

D. The City extracted concessions from
Time Inc. and Warner Communications
Inc. to improve public access program-
ming during their merger negotiations.... 18

E. The City used the renewal provisions
of the Cable Communications Policy
Act of 1984 to force Time Warner to
make significant investments to im-
prove public access programming in
Pe cacektcoccnneititeshnentaiindsanensanions 21

‘3

TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued
Page

F. The 1990 Manhattan cable franchise
agreements strengthened the First
Amendment rights of Manhattan’s res-
idents to freely express themselves on
the public access channels.................... 25

Il. This Court should encourage public fo-
rums like Manhattan’s public access chan-
nels because they create more speech....... 28

ED ccnsescesttncresnesnntensintssimreienssteneententnns 33

Appendix—Press Release dated May 16, 1991.... App. 1

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page
CASES
Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983) ................... 7,29
Eastern Telecom Corp. v. Borough of East

Conemaugh, 872 F.2d 30 (3d Cir. 1989).................. 22
New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) ......... 4
New York Times Company v. United States, 403

SE, SIE TED cciasisdienniainstncahecseentiaiiiatbionmenstbinieiatiibesntondiaad 4
Union CATV, Inc. v. City of Sturgis, 107 F.3d 434

ee ecicctectanssecnienhetctebescasinertstesinsencceniusi 30, 31
Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977) ..................2..20000+ 30
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
Se Ir IIE Oooo echicisidenetrssiesinmananemnenenntinnsl passim
STATUTES, BILLS AND REGULATIONS
H.R. Rep. No. 98-934 (1984), 1984 U.S.C.C_ALN.

SEIT sinsstanistuisiennatanienslitunscisstseinintinastauadiannbtaisenianpainopaieanintn 22
EE: Oe UID cnichinliciitincamiaisiananisteneianindseicosmsiannbeniuaeida 28
47 U.S.C.

EIN

33

CONCLUSION

The Court should affirm the judgment entered be-
low.

Respectfully submitted,

E.uiot DoLsy SHIELDS

ILyssa S. Fucus

ROBERT RICKNER

New York County LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
14 Vesey Street

New York, New York 10007

CAROLYN A. KUBITSCHEK
Counsel of Record
LANSNER & KUBITSCHEK
325 Broadway, Suite 203
New York, New York 10007
(212) 349-0900
ckubitschek@Lanskub.com

Counsel for Amicus Curiae
January 18, 2019

App. 1

— Manhattan Borough President
RUTH MESSINGER

MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 1 CENTRE STREET,
19th FLOOR, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: ROBERT BRAVO-WEBER
MAY 16, 1991 (212) 669-8140

MESSINGER ANNOUNCES FORMATION OF
COMMUNITY ACCESS ORGANIZATION TO AD-
MINISTER PUBLIC ACCESS CABLE CHANNELS

Several months after Manhattan Borough Presi-
dent Ruth Messinger appointed a seven-member ini-
tial board of directors to administer Manhattan’s four
public access channels, the Borough President and the
CAO’s chair Gretchen Dykstra announce today that
the Manhattan Community Access Organization has
ratified its by-laws and has filed for incorporation.

The CAO’s central charge is to administer and
manage all the public access channels of the cable tel-
evision systems in Manhattan — currently Paragon and
Manhattan cable system — and oversee the use of facil-
ities, equipment, supplies, services and other support
made available for programming.

Prior to ratifying its by-laws, the Board met with
many local public access producer groups, government
officials and the Time-Warner company. “I think this
small group of talented and dedicated individuals has
done an extraordinary job of putting together the most
extensive and thoughtful set of by-laws to govern such

App. 2

an organization. From the outset, I stressed to them
that I wanted an open and independent board and or-
ganization. I am very pleased to say they took my
charge to heart,” said the Borough President.

Highlights of the CAD’s by-laws include:

* A 19-member board, representing the ethnic,
economic and geographical diversity of Manhattan
will, one year after the CAO begins training sessions
for public access producers, include six slots reserved
for active public access producers.

* The establishment of an Advisory Nominating
Committee, to recommend individuals for the six pub-
lic access producer slots on the Board.

* Tough prohibitions against conflicts of interest,
ensuring the independence and integrity of the Board.

* In addition to its Annual Meeting the Board
will hold at least two meetings each year that will be
open to the public.

CAO’s goals include:

* A training program that will assist and train
individuals and community groups on how to use pub-
lic access television. The program will include advice
on how to plan and produce programming for public
access channel, instruction on how to use equipment
and production facilities creatively and efficiently, and
how to maximize channel time.

* An extensive outreach program that will en-
courage newcomers and beginners to participate in the

App. 3

training sessions. Likewise, outreach to experienced
producers to assist in setting the organization’s goals
and policies.

* A charge to develop additional funding re-
sources to expand and promote public access televi-
sion.

The Manhattan CAO unlike its counterparts in
the other boroughs is in a unique situation since Man-
hattan has a history of public access television while
the others do not.

“There are very high expectations for the Manhat-
tan CAO. There is a long history of public access tele-
vision here and people have very strong opinions about
how the CAO should operate. Current users and future
public access producers will be very impressed with
the openness of this organization,” said Ms. Messinger.

Under the terms of the agreement between the
City and Time-Warner, the CAO will receive a capital
grant of $5.35 million to be used for facilities and
equipment. At this time, that money is held in escrow
by the Borough President until the State Cable Com-
mission on Television (CCT) — which has jurisdiction
over cable issues — authorizes its disbursement. The
CAO is required to submit to the Borough President
and the CCT a capital expenditure plan, detailing how
the CAO intends to spend these capital funds.

In addition to the capital grant, Time-Warner is
required to pay the CAO $3 per subscriber per year to
assist in defraying operating costs. This money will

App. 4

also be used to make grants to assist public access pro-
ducers and support programming initiatives of the
CAO.

Biographies of the Board of Directors (in alphabet-
ical order)

Andrew Blau — Vice Chair — Project Coordinator
and Research Associate, Columbia Institute for Tele-
Information, Columbia Graduate School of Business.
Former Assistant for Communication Policy/Advocacy
for the United Church of Christ. Former Chair of the
group, New York Citizen’s Committee for Responsible
Media. Vice-Chair of the National Federation of Local
Cable Programmers and an active member of the As-
sociation of Independent Video and Filmakers Advo-
cacy Committee.

Gretchen Dykstra — Chair — Project Director for
National Video Resources, a project of the Rockefeller
Foundation. Served as Director of Communications for
the Charter Revision Commission. A member of the
Communications Advisory Committee for the Gay
Men’s Health Crisis. Active with Citizens Union Foun-
dation and Television Trust for the Environment.

Laura Handman is a Partner with the law firm of
Lankenau & Bickford, representing national and loca!
magazines, new weeklies and book publishers in the
areas of libel, privacy, copyright, trademark, obscenity
and other matters. Prior to that, she worked as an As-
sistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District
of New York. Serves as a Director for the Volunteer
Lawyers for the Arts.

App. 5

Christopher Poussaint, Vice President of Research
and Development with J.I1. Sopher and Company, a real
estate brokerage firm in New York City. Co-chair of
Publicity and Communications for Community Board
1. Graduate of Institute for New Cinema Artists. Inde-
pendent producer for cable and broadcast television
and a member of the National Association of Broad-
casters and the National Cable Television Association.

Ruby Rich, Director of Film and Media programs,
the New York State Council on the Arts. Former film
critic, Chicago Reader. Writer, Village Voice. Former
Director, Film Center, School of the Arts Institute.
Member of the National Advisory Board, Frameline
Festival, San Francisco.

Arthur Tsuchiya is a visiting Assistant Professor
with the Department of Theater at Middlebury Col-
lege, Vermont. Formerly with the New York State
Council on the Arts. Currently serves as Senior Con-
sultant to Independent Television Services.

Blanca Vazquez, editor, Centro Bulletin, a journal
focusing on Puerto Ricans living in the United States
and Puerto Rico, published by the Center for Puerto
Rican Studies at Hunter College, New York. Active
with El Museo del Barrio, Institute for Puerto Rican
Policy, the National Congress for Puerto Rican Rights
and Media Network.

Upon her recent election as Chair of the Manhat-
tan CAO, Gretchen Dykstra said: “Whether it’s for
entertainment, education or empowerment, we hope
to set a new standard for opening up television in

App. 6

Manhattan, so that anyone who wants, will have a
voice. We all can learn from and enjoy the diversity of
these opinions, ideas and dreams.”

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385016_0833%3A21. Public record. Not legal advice.
