# Amicus Curiae Brief — McConnell v. Federal Election Commission

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385014_0664%3A39

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Amicus Curiae Brief
- **Published:** January 1, 2003
- **Citation:** 539 U.S. 938

## Text

t Soul Ly >. Thus, under
BCRA, corporations that meet the three requirements set
forth in MCFL continue to be exempt from the disclosure
requirements and expenditure limitations of FECA.

Nonprofit advocacy corporations that continue to
receive corporate and/or labor union contributions are
therefore faced with a choice under BCRA. They can
either refuse to accept such contributions, thereby
exempting themselves from BCRA’s disclosure rules and
expenditure limitations, or accept such contributions,
subjecting themselves to BCRA with its requirement that
electioneering communications be funded through a seg-
regated fund. Given the compelling interest in prevent-
ing nonprofit corporations from being used as conduits
for prohibited corporate and labor union electioneering

— = ~

‘ 29

activities, the application of BCRA to nonprofit corpo-
rations that choose to receive corporate and labor union
contributions is clearly constitutional, especially since

the option of establishing a PAC leaves open a full range
of communicative options.

30

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, amici curiae respectfully
submit that the electioneering provisions of BCRA, Sec-
tions 201-204, are constitutional.

Dated: New York, New York
August 5, 2003

Respectfully submitted,

Norman Dorsen

Eric M. Lieberman Counsel of Record

Roger Bearden Stokes Professor of Law

Gregory Silbert New York University

Rabinowitz, Boudin, School of Law
Standard, Krinsky & 40 Washington Square
Lieberman, P.C. South

740 Broadway, 5th Floor New York, NY 10012
New York, NY 10003-9518 (212) 998-6233
(212) 254-1111

Attorneys for Amici Curiae
Former Leaders of the American Civil Liberties Union

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385014_0664%3A39. Public record. Not legal advice.
