# Joint Appendix — Lawyer v. Department of Justice > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385013_0774%3A07 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Joint Appendix - **Published:** January 1, 1997 - **Citation:** 521 U.S. 567 ## Text Supreme Court; U S. at sa Ff NOV 27 96 Suprenve Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1996 C. MARTIN LAWYER, III, w. Appellant, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida JOINT APPENDIX ROBERT J. SHAPIRO* RICHARD G. TARANTO* P.O. Box 270133 Farr & Taranto Tampa, Florida 33688-0133 2445 M Street, N.W., Suite 225 (813) 265-1117 Washington, D.C. 20037-1435 Counsel for Appellant (202) 775-0184 Counsel for State Appellees WALTER DELLINGER* Acting Solicitor General Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 (202) 514-2217 Counsel for the United States ROBERT B. MCDUFF* 767 North Congress Street Jackson, Mississippi 39202-3009 (601) 969-0802 Counsel for Private Appellees * Counsel of Record [Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Cover] JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT FILED JUNE 17, 1996 PROBABLE JURISDICTION NOTED OCTOBER 15, 1996 PETER ANTONACCI Deputy Attorney General GEORGE L. WAAS Assistant Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050 (904) 488-1573 Counsel for the State of Florida B. ELAINE NEW Office of General Counsel Florida House of Representatives Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1300 (904) 488-7631 Counsel for the Florida House JAMES M. LANDIS TERR! GILLIS TUCKER Foley and Lardner 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 2700 Tampa, Florida 33602-5810 (813) 229-2300 Counsel for Robert Scott, et al. STEPHEN N. ZACK Zack, Sparber, Kosnitzky, P.A. 100 S.E. Second Street, Suite 2800 Miami, Florida 33131-2144 (305) 539-8400 Counsel for the Florida Senate DONALD L. BELL DAVID TEPPER Office of General Counsel Florida Department of State Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 (904) 488-3684 Counsel for the Secretary of State BEN H. Hi, Ill Hill, Ward & Henderson 101 E. Kennedy Bivd., Suite 3700 Tampa, Florida 33602-5156 (813) 221-3900 Counsel for the Florida Senate BRENDA WRIGHT Topp A. Cox Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law 1450 G Street N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005-2001 (202) 662-8600 Counsel for Moease Smith, et al. DIEGO RODRIGUEZ Committee on Regulated Industries The Florida Senate Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1100 (904) 487-5957 Counsel for the Florida Senate TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE 1. Selected District Docket Entries ....................... | Ps bcdksncdsdendeeencebednecobenss caséake 11 3. District Court Order dated September 30,1995 .......... 16 ED nin cc dbtbedes cess sbdecvcdosnes« 17 5. Defendants’ Filing dated November 17, 1995 ............ 23 Deshasation of Dales Guttathe ww. ccc cccccccccccccces 25 TAB 1: Population Shifts Relative to Current [1992] th ib6aks sen coeteahenewndneetess 37 TAB 2: 1990 Census of Population ................. 39 TAB 3: 1994 Voter Registration ................... 42 TAB 4: Number of Counties per Senate District ....... 45 TAB 5: Relationships between Districts and Counties .. 47 TAB 6: Distinctive Socioeconomic Characteristics . Ss Serr rer 49 TAB 7: Distinctive Socioeconomic Characteristics of Senate District 21 — Controlling for Race ...... 51 TAB 8: Mobility of Voters in Senate District 22....... 52 ee sancesnccctcntocstooecocess 53 TAB 10: Unusually-Shaped Districts ................ 60 TAB 11: Comparison of District 21 in Settlement Eo cack d cconceceadecoeeres 76 TAB 12: Municipal Boundaries .................... 78 TAB 13: Contiguity across Bodies of Water .......... 81 TAB 14: Bill Language and Statistics for Plan 386 ..... 84 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) ITEM 1: SELECTED DISTRICT DOCKET ENTRIES ITEM PAGE U.S. District Court 5. Defendants’ Filing dated November 17, 1995 (Continued) Phe ae eee og pao Affidavit of William DeGrove ...................... 126 Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Allan J. Lichtman ..... 129 Scott, et al. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, et al. Filed: 04/14/94 Assigned to: Judge Steven D. Merryday Affidavit of Peter Rudy Waliace .................... 137 Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 441 Declaration of Mr. Michael Cochran .:............... 139 Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: U.S. Defendant Dkt# in other court: None Declaration of Charles B. Wells .............- 55-055. 144 Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation Declaration of Frederick B. Karl eececeesseceseseeeeeeees 146 THE FLORIDA SENATE, Stephen N. Zack Declaration of Clarence Fort ................000000- 149 through SENATOR JIM == Zack, Hanzman, Ponce, Tucker, SCOTT in his official Korge & Gillespie, P.A. Declaration of Edward Kirkland .................... 152 capacity as President of 100 SE Second St. 6. Transcript of November 20, 1995, Hearing ............. 155 , . intervenor Miami, FL 33131 7. District Court’s March 19, 1996, Order................ 195 305/539-8400 Benjamin H. Hill, I Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. 101 E. Kennedy Bivd., Suite 3700 P.O. Box 2231 Tampa, FL 33601 813/221-3900 JAMES T. HARGRETT, JR. Robert B. McDuff intervenor Law Office of Robert B. McDuff 771 N. Congress St. Jackson, MS 39202 601/969-0802 MOEASE SMITH Brenda Wnght intervenor Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law 1450 G St., N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 202/662-8600 IRMA RODRIGUEZ intervenor RUBIN RODRIGUEZ intervenor CARL SMALL intervenor NINA SMALL intervenor BEN SMITH, JR. intervenor PARKE HER®FRT, laintiff C. MARTIN LAWYER, II], James Maxwell Landis sndividal Laintiff Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright Brenda Wright James Maxwell Landis Foley & Lardner 100 N. Tampa St., Suite 2700 P.O. Box 3391 Tampa, FL 33601-3391 813/229-2300 James Maxwell Landis EDNA SIMS, individual plainuff EARL JAMES, individual laintiff ROSALIE M. SERRANO, individual plaintiff Vv. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUS- TICE, by and through Janet Reno defendant JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States defendant STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Robert Butterworth defendant ROBERT BUTTERWORTH, Attorney General of the State of Florida defendant James Maxwell Landis James Maxwell Landis James Maxwell Landis Steven J. Mulroy Richard B. Jerome U.S. Dept. of Justice Voting Section, Civil Rights Section P.O. Box 66128 Washington, DC 20035-6128 202/514-9821 Steven J. Mulroy George Lee Waas Peter Antonacci Attorney General's Office Dept. of Legal Affairs The Capitol, Suite PL-01 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050 904/488-1573 THE FLORIDA SENATE movant Stephen N. Zack Zack, Hanzman, Ponce, Tucker, Korge & Gillespie, P.A. 100 SE Second St. International Place, Suite 2800 Miami, FL 33131 305/539-8400 Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. Jenner & Block 601 13th St. N.W. Washington, DC 20005 202/639-6010 B. Elaine New Florida House of Representatives 417 The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399 904/488-0350 Parker D. Thomson Thomson, Muraro, Razook & Hart, P.A. One SE Third Ave. 1700 Sun Bank Int’! Center Miami, FL 33131 305/350-7200 Charles Gilbert Burr, I Charles G. Burr, P.A. 442 W. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 300 Tampa, FL 33606 813/253-2010 Donald L. Bell Florida Dept. of State Office of the Secretary LL-10, The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 904/488-3684 7/14/95 7 78 COMPLAINT filed; exhibit; Three-Judge District Court requested. ORDER: DESIGNATION OF THREE-JUDGE COURT. (Hon. Gerald Bard Tjoflat, Chief Circuit Judge) ENDORSED ORDER granting [33-1] motion for leave to intervene as defendants by The Florida Senate. (Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday) ORDER granting [44-1] motion to intervene by Moease Smith, Wilmateen Chandler, Vivian Kelly, Jesse Nipper, Victoria Brown, Anthony Carswell, Patrice Carswell, Katherine Clark, Earnest Clark, Clarence Fort, Yvonne Fort, Sarah Gooding, Mary Hobley, Emanuel Johnson, Kathy Malone, Nadine McLeod, Elizabeth McMillan, Irma Rodriguez, Rubin Rodriguez, Carl Small, Nina Small, Ben Smith, Jr., Geraldine Tillmon, Michael Tillmon, Julia Timmons, Harold Williams, George Young; granting [39-1] motion to intervene by Senator James T. Hargrett, Jr.; set dispositive motion filing deadline for 8/1/95; set pretrial statement and objections to exhibit and witness lists deadline for 9/8/95; set pretrial conference on “liability” for 9/18/95. Scheduled for Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins; this action is submitted to mediation; the Magistrate Judge is relieved of any further responsibility in this case; responses to dispositive motions shall be filed on or before 08/11/95; the parties shall exchange proposed pretrial stipula- tions on or before 08/23/95; the parties shall exchange witness and exhibit lists on or before 08/31/95; pretrial briefs on “liability” are due on or before 09/22/95; a trial on “liability” before the three-judge panel will commence on 09/25/95; a pretrial conference on “remedies” will occur on 11/14/95; pretrial briefs on “remedies” are due on or before 11/17/95; and the trial on “remedies” before the three-judge panel will commence as 7/14/95 7/14/95 7/26/95 9/6/95 9/12/95 9/27/95 10/2/95 79 97 131 138 150 152 soon as possible after the November 14 pretrial conference, but in no event later than January 1996; every 30 days following entry of this order, the parties shall file a status report. (Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday) ORDER referring case to Lawrence G. Mathews, Jr., as mediator; the mediation conference shall commence no later than 08/15/95 and shall con- clude no later than 08/31/95. Lead Counsel to coordinate dates. (Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday) Bench trial before the three-judge panel set on 9/25/95. Amended ORDER referring case to mediation and referring case to Lawrence G. Mathews, Jr., as mediator. Mediation shall commence no later than 8/15/95 and conclude no later than 8/31/95. Lead Counsel, James Landis, to coordinate dates. (Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT filed by Robert Scott, Parke Herbert, C. Martin Lawyer, III, Edna Sims, Earl James, Rosalie M. Serrano, U.S. Dept of Justice, Janet Reno, State of [Florida,] The Florida Senate, James T. Hargrett, Jr., Moease Smith, Jr., Sandra Barringer Mortham. MOTION by C. Martin Lawyer, III, with memoran- dum in support to disapprove settlement agree- ment. MINUTE ENTRY: status conference held on 9/27/95 before Judges Tjoflat, Nimmons and Merryday. Order forthcoming. ORDER directing return of letter to Judge Merryday from Howard Forman, dated 9/21/95, for failure to comply with local and Federal Rules. (Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday) 10/20/95 10/26/95 11/2/95 11/2/95 11/3/95 11/3/95 11/7/95 11/8/95 11/13/95 162 165 169 171 172 173 174 175 178 JOINT MOTION by C. Martin Lawyer, III, to substi- tute attorney. MINUTE ENTRY: status conference held on 10/26/95 before Judge Merryday. Court Reporter: Carol Jacobs. Court set pretrial conference ior 1:30, 11/2/95, and advised counsel to clear calen- dars for week of 11/20/95 for possible trial date. Settlement Agreement, with attachments, filed in open court, by Robert Scott, Parke Herbert, C. Martin Lawyer, II, Edna Sims, Ear! James, Rosalie M. Serrano. MINUTE ENTRY: status conference held on 11/2/95 before Judge Merryday. Court Reporter: Carol Jacobs. Fairness Hearing scheduled for 1 1/20/95 at 9:30 in Courtroom. : MOTION by C. Martin Lawyer, II], with memoran- dum in support to approve proposed redistricting plan “lawyer-sen.” MOTION by C. Martin Lawyer, II, with memoran- dum in support for partial summary judgment before considering approval vel non of proposed settlement agreement. NOTICE of filing 3 original maps for attachment to previous motion, by C. Martin Lawyer, III. NOTICE of fairness hearing filed by counsel pursu- ant to the directions from the Court at a pretrial conference held before Judge Merryday on 11/2/95. Copies of the proposed settlement plan submitted for public inspection at the Office of the Clerk. Set settlement conference for 9:30, 11/20/95. Scheduled for a three-judge panel includ- ing Judge Steven D. Merryday. MOTION by C. Martin Lawyer, II], with memoran- dum in support to disapprove 11/2/95 “settlement agreement.” 11/17/95 11/17/95 11/20/95 11/20/95 3/19/96 187 190 193 196 NOTICE of filing map of settlement plan and statis- tical data, by The Florida Senate. NOTICE of filing declarations and affidavits of defendants and intervenors in support of settlement agreement of 11/2/95, except Plaintiff C. Martin Lawyer, (attached) by The Florida Senate. See separate folder for this document. MINUTE ENTRY: Fairness Hearing held on | 1/20/95 before Judges Tjoflat, Merryday and Nimmons; taken under advisement. PROOF OF PUBLICATION re: Fairness Hearing, filed in open court at the hearing 11/20/95, by The Florida Senate. Newspaper: eleven newspapers in Florida, as listed herein. Date(s) of publication: Nov. 10, 11 and 17, 1995. (Retained in chambers) FINAL ORDER granting [185-1] joint motion to approve settlement; denying [178-1] motion to disapprove 11/2/95 “settlement agreement”; deny- ing [173-1] motion for partial summary judgment before considering approval vel non of proposed settlement agreement; denying [172-1] motion to approve proposed redistricting plan “lawyer-sen”’, denying [167-1] motion to examine witnesses, introduce evidence, and raise objections under certain defined circumstances; denying [162-1] joint motion to substitute attorney; denying motion to disapprove settlement agreement; denying [126-1] motion for leave to file affidavit of Lisa Handley; denying [113-1] motion for summary judgment on standing grounds; denying [103-1] motion for summary judgment; denying [72-1] motion to compel responses to interrogatories; denying [60-1] motion to three-judge court to decline jurisdiction; denying [52-1] motion to dismiss; denying [52-2] motivn to transfer case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday, for the Panel) 19/96 - CASE CLOSED. 4/16/96 205 NOTICE OF APPEAL of [196-1] order by C. Martin Lawyer, III, pursuant to Rule 18 of the Supreme Court Rules. (no fee) 6/24/96 210 Normicé of filing Martin Lawyer’s appeal, by Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States. [END OF DOCKET: 8:94cv622] 10 ITEM 2: COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT, PARKE HERBERT, C. MARTIN LAWYER, III, EDNA SIMS, EARL JAMES, and ROSALIE M. SERRANO, Plaintiffs, VS. CASE NO. 94-622-CIV-T-23C THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, by and through JANET RENO, THREE JUDGE Attorney General of the United States; DISTRICT COURT and THE STATE OF FLORIDA, by and REQUESTED through ROBERT BUTTERWORTH, Attorney General of the State of Florida, Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, ROBERT SCOTT, PARKE HERBERT, C. MARTIN LAWYER, III, EDNA SIMS, EARL JAMES, and ROSALIE M. SERRANO, (together “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby sue THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, by and through JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States and THE STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through ROBERT BUTTERWORTH, Attorney General of the State of Florida, (together “Defendants”), and state: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Plaintiffs are individuals residing and registered to vote in Hillsborough County, Florida. 2. Defendant Janet Reno (“Reno”) is the Attorney General of the United States, and accordingly, is head of the United States Depart- ment of Justice. 11 3. Defendant Robert A. Butterworth (“Butterworth”) is the Attorney General of the State of Florida. JURISDICTION 4. This is an action for a declaratory judgment that the Reappor- tionment Plan for the State of Florida as adopted by the Florida Legislature is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and for injunctive relief mandating that the Florida Legislature reconfigure the senatorial districts in and around Hillsborough County, Florida. This Court has jurisdiction over this section pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $1331 (1993), 28 U.S.C. §1343(1), (2), (3), and (4) (1993) and 28 U.S.C. §2201 et seq. THREE JUDGE PANEL 5. Convocation of a three-judge panel is required by 28 U.S.C. §2284(a) because this action challenges the constitutionality of the apportionment of senatorial districts for the State of Florida. SPECIFIC ALLEGATIONS 6. In response to the results of the 1990 decennial census, the State of Florida began the process of redrawing its congressional! and senatorial districts. The United States Department of Justice refused to grant preclearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to the original plan proposed for the Senate redistricting in and around Hillsborough County, Florida. Subsequently, on or about June 25, 1992, the State of Florida adopted redistricting Plan 330 for the Florida Senate (herein, the “Reapportionment Plan”). The Depart- ment of Justice entered no objection to the Reapportionment Plan. A true and correct copy of the map of the new senatorial districts for Hillsborough County and the surrounding area is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. 7. Prior to the institution of the Reapportionment Plan, Florida Senate District 21 encompassed most of the area within the city limits of Tampa, in Hillsborough County, Florida. 8. As a part of the Reapportionment Plan, however, the State of Florida completely reconfigured the senatorial districts which include 12 es Hillsborough, Pinellas, Polk, Manatee, Pasco and Hernando Coun- ties, Florida. 9. Part of District 21 in Hillsborough County was gerrymandered on one side of several streets to prevent potential opponents from opposing the author of the plan. 10. Under the Reapportionment Plan, Senate District 21 now runs in a snake-like fashion from northern Hillsborough County through Polk County, south into Manatee County, and back up into Pinellas County, deliberately encompassing only predominately African- American and Hispanic neighborhoods. See Exhibit “A”. 11. Senate District 21, which was drastically reconfigured by the principles of compactness and contiguity, as it is a long, narrow, winding strip which spans Tan’ a Bay, four counties, and countless different communities. and at some points is no wider than a road. 12. Senate District 21 was deliberately drawn in an irregular fashion in order to ensure that at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the population of the district was comprised of minorities. Senate District 21 was not drawn to encompass members of one community, but rather was drawn specifically to encompass members of minority groups with divergent interests residing in several different commu- nities. The shape of the District results in a political unit incapable of meaningful representation. Accordingly, the Reapportionment Plan does not create districts based on commonality of interests, but rather based only upon commonality of race. 13. The configuration produced by the Reapportionment Plan is so irregular that it clearly cannot rationally be understood as anything other than an attempt to segregate the races for purposes of voting. Prior to the Reapportionment Plan, the County of Hillsborough was represented by 3 Senators, two of whose districts were solely contained in Hillsborough County and one whose district contained a minor portion of Pasco County. However, because of the reconfigu- ration of District 21, Hillsborough County is now represented by 6 Senators, all of whom have only a portion of Hillsborough County including one Senate district which contains only 359 residents of Hillsborough County and one which contains no residents of 13 Hillsborough County. Some of the areas now represented by Hillsborough County Senators have purely agricultural or rural interests, while the majority of Hillsborough County is urban. 14. The arbitrary configuration of districts produced by the Reapportionment Plan is not narrowly tailored to promote a compel- ling state interest, and accordingly constitutes racial gerrymandering in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 15. The citizens of Hillsborough County have been deprived of their right, under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, to be free from purposeful discrimination by the State on the basis of race. Deprivation of such a fundamental right clearly constitutes irreparable injury, for which injunctive relief should lie. 16. Plaintiffs and other citizens of Hillsborough County, Florida have no adequate remedy at law, and therefore are entitled to injunctive relief. 17. Plaintiffs have retained the services of the law firm of Foley & Lardner to represent them in this matter. WHEREPORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court (a) enter a Declaratory Judgment that the Reapportionment Plan violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amend- ment to the United States Constitution; (b) enter an Injunction prohibiting the State of Florida from holding any future Senatorial elections based on the 1992 Sewricting plan: (c) Enter an order requiring the State of Florida to reconfigure the Senatorial Districts in the State of Florida to comport with Sitional districti tnstosts of cxatientin. por wees ee , hers oe wn — and (d) Enter an Order awarding the Plaintiffs reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs incurred in the maintenance of this action pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412 or as otherwise 14 2 ero wee So Oe = I authorized by law, together with any other relief the Court deems Dated: April 14, 1994 Fla. Bar No. 0116760 Terni Gillis Tucker, Esq. Trial Counsel Fla. Bar No. 0962503 Foley & Lardner 100 North Tampa Street Suite 2700 Tampa, Florida 33602 (813) 229-2300 (813) 221-4210 (FAX) Attorneys for Plaintiffs EXHIBIT A {Note: Exhibit A consists of an 8% by 11-inch map depicting the 1992 Senate Districts (Plan 330) in Hillsborough County and the surrounding area (see p. 58 for a similar map).} 15 ITEM 3: DISTRICT COURT ORDER DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT , etal., Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO. 94-622-CIV-T-23C THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. ORDER Correspondence dated September 21, 1995, from Howard Forman, Florida Senator from District 32 was received in judge’s chambers. Upon review, the document is found to be deficient in the following respects: _%_ Local Rule Requirements: The enclosed document does not comply with Local Rule 3.01(f): “All applications to the Court (i) requesting relief in any form . . . shall not be addressed or presented to the Court in the form of a letter or the like... .” _% _ Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Requirement: The enclosed document does not comply with Rule 5: “[E}very notice . . . shall be served upon each of the parties... . All papers .. . required to be served upon a party, together with a certificate of service shall be filed’ with the court.” /__ The Clerk is directed to return this pleading to Mr. Forman. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on September 30th, 1995. /s/ Steven D. Merryday Steven D. Merryday UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE '“The filing of papers with the court . . . shall be made by filing them with the clerk of the court. . . .” F.R.Civ.P. 5(e). 16 ot we ITEM 4: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. CASE No. 94-622-CIV-T-23C THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, by and through JANET RENO, Attorney General, et al., Defendants, and THE FLORIDA SENATE, through SENATOR JiM SCOTT in his official capacity as President of the Florida Senate, Defendant-Intervenor. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1. The plaintiffs in this case challenge the constitutionality of Senate District 21 in the current Florida State Senate redistricting plan (“Plan 330"), alleging that it is a racial gerrymander unde: the cause of action recognized by the United States Supreme Couit ir Shaw v. Reno, 113 S.Ct. 2816 (1993). They assert that District 21 violates the Fourteenth Amendment under Miller v. Johnson, 115 S.Ct. 2475 (1995). 2. Defendants and defendant-intervenors deny these assertions. 3. The parties nonetheless do agree, for the purpose of settlement only, that based upon the evidence of record, there is a reasonable factual and legal basis for the plaintiffs’ claim. 4. The parties recognize that litigation of plaintiffs’ claims will be expensive and time-consuming, and will entail significant risks for both sides, especially because of the unsettled nature of the law in this area. The parties further recognize that litigation of these claims is likely to be protracted, causing an undesirable uncertainty in the electoral process. In order to conserve resources, reduce risk, and 17 obtain certainty and finality in the electoral process, the parties have agreed to resolve this dispute through compromise. 5. The parties therefore agree to modification of the current Senate redistricting plan, Plan 330, in the manner detailed in Plan 386 as depicted in Appendix A. The Florida House of Representa- tives, the Florida Senate, the Florida Secretary of State, and the Florida Attorney General request that all members of the public be given an opportunity to express their views on this Settlement Agreement at the hearing discussed in paragraph 9. 6. With the exception of one district, the plan set out in Appendix A only affects voters in odd-numbered districts, which are scheduled for elections in 1996. Because the next regularly scheduled elections in those districts are imminent, the parties agree that out-of-cycle elections are unnecessary in those districts. 7. With respect to the even numbered Senate districts, only District 22 is affected by the proposed settlement. District 22 would gain approximately 3,200 residents under the settlement plan. This District is scheduled for election in 1998. The parties agree that the changes to District 22 in the proposed settlement plan are less than 1% of the population of the Senate district. The parties, except for the House, agree that this de minimus effect on an even numbered district does not require out-of-cycle elections under either state or federal law. The House has no position as to the legal necessity for out-of-cycle elections but agrees not to seek out-of-cycle elections in either state or federal court. The parties also recognize that this court has the authority under federal law to order the proposed settlement plan into effect without ordering out-of-cycle elections. 8. By agreeing to this settlement, plaintiffs Scott, James, Sims and Serano agree to dismiss their constitutional claims against Plan 330. 9. The parties request that the court hold a fairness hearing on the proposed settlement at which members of the public, upon proper notice, will be given the opportunity to review the proposed settle- ment and express their views. If the court provisionally approves this settlement after the fairness hearing, the Florida Attorney General agrees to promptly submit the plan, on behalf of the State of Florida, to the United States Department of Justice under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The Attorney General agrees to submit the plan for Section 5 review in this particular case only in order to facilitate settlement of this matter. The Justice Department agrees to make every effort to expedite its Section 5 review. The parties agree to a suspension of all trial preparation deadlines while the Court consid- ers the proposed settlement. 10. The plan finally approved by the Court will be used in state “enate elections unless and until the State of Florida adopts a new plan in accordance with federal and state law. 11. The amount of Plaintiffs’ attorney fees is left for determina- tion by the Court. APPROVED AND AGREED TO this 2nd day of November, 1995. /s/ James M. Landis [unsigned] James M. Landis C. Martin Lawyer, IT], Esq. Terri Gillis Tucker Florida Bar No. 0128095 Foley & Lardner 3105 River Grove Drive 100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 2700 Tampa, Florida 33610-1135 Tampa, Florida 33602 (813) 223-2525 ext. 109 (813) 229-2300 FAX: (813) 221-4210 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Scott, James[,] Sims & Serrano ROBERT BUTTERWORTH Attorney General /s/ George Waas Peter Antonacci George Waas Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General PL-O1 The Capitol Tallahassee, FL 32399-1020 (904) 488-1573; FAX: (904) 488-4872 Attorneys for the State of Florida 19 DEVAL L. PATRICK Assistant Attorney General Rebecca J. Wertz Steven J. Mulroy Richard B. Jerome Attorneys, Voting Section Civil Rights Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 66128 Washington, DC 20035-6128 (202) 514-9821; FAX: (202) 307-3961 's/ Benjamin H. Hill, Benjamin H. Hill, I Florida Bar No. 094585 Charlene E. Honeywell, Esq. Florida Bar No. 346616 Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. Post Office Box 2231 Tampa, Florida 33601 (813) 221-3900; FAX: (813) 221-2900 Attorneys for Defendant- Intervenor The Florida Senate /s/ B. Elaine New B. Elaine New General Counsel Gerald B. Curington Deputy General Counsel Room 319, The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1300 (904) 488-7631; FAX: (904) 488-6074 Attorneys for the Florida House /s/ Stephen N. Zack Stephen N. Zack Florida Bar No. 145215 Zack Ponce Tucker & Korge 2800 International Place 100 S.E. Second Street Miami, Florida 33131-2100 (305) 539-8400 FAX: (305) 539-1307 Attomeys for Defendant- Intervenor The Florida Senate ee ee ee — eer, — ls/ Todd A. Cox Todd A. Cox Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law 1450 “G” Street N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 662-8321; FAX: (202) 783-5130 Attorney for Smith intervenors /s/ Donald L. Bell Donald L. Bell General Counsel, Florida Dept. of State Office of the Secretary PL-02, The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 (904) 488-3684; FAX: (904) 922-5763 Attorney for the Secretary of State, Sandra B. Mortham /s/ Robert B. McDuff Robert B. McDuff 771 North Congress Street Jackson, Mississippi 39202 (601) 969-0802; FAX: 969-0804 Attorney for Senator Hargrett [Note: Appendix A includes “District Statistics by County, Plan 386 (Senate)” (see pp. 102-109) and an oversized color map of “Proposed Plan 386,” depicting district boundaries in the Tampa Bay area, with street and water boundaries detailed. ] 21 a nr ITEM 5: DEFENDANTS’ FILING DATED NOVEMBER 17, 1995 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO. 94-622-CIV-T-23C THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, etc., et al., Defendants, and THE FLORIDA SENATE, through SENATOR JIM SCOTT in his official capacity as President of the Florida Senate, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. NOTICE OF FILING DECLARATIONS AND AFFIDAVITS IN SUPPORT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF NOVEMBER 2, 1995 The Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors hereby submit the attached declarations and affidavits in support of the Settlement Agreement entered by the parties, except Plaintiff C. Martin Lawyer, on November 2, 1995: 1. Declaration of John Guthrie. [see pp. 25-125]. 2. Affidavit of William DeGrove. [see pp. 126-128]. 3. Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Allan J. Lichtman. [see pp. 129-136]. 4. Affidavit of Peter R. Wallace, Speaker of the House of Representatives. [see pp. 137-138]. 5. Declaration of Michael Cochran. [see pp. 139-143). . Declaration of Charles B. Wells, Sheriff of Manatee County. [see pp. 144-145]. 7. Declaration of Frederick Karl. [see pp. 146-148]. 8. Declaration of Clarence Fort. [see pp. 149-151]. 9. Declaration of Edward Kirkland. [see pp. 152-154). Respectfully submitted, /s/_ Benjamin H. Hill, 0 BENJAMIN H. HILL, II, Esq. Florida Bar No. 094585 Charlene E. Honeywell, Esq. Florida Bar No. 346616 Hill, Ward & Henderson, P.A. Post Office Box 2231 Tampa, Florida 33601 (813) 221-3900 Co-counsel for the Florida Senate DECLARATION OF JOHN GUTHRIE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, I declare under the penalty of perjury the following: 1. Ihave personal knowledge of the facts set out below. 2. My name is John Guthrie. I lived in Largo, Florida (Pinellas County) from 1956 through 1972. I received a B.A. in political science from Davidson College in 1976 and an M.A. in political science from the University of Florida in 1977. I pursued doctoral studies in political science at the University of Rochester from 1977 through 1980, but I did not earn a degree. In August of 1989, I was employed as staff director for the Florida Senate Reapportionment Office. I designed and directed technical support for legislative and matters, assisted Senators with development of redistricting plans, and supervised technical and administrative support for Reapportion- ment Committee meetings and Senate floor debate. Since 1992, I have served as staff director for various senate committees while also providing technical and administrative support for reapportionm nt litigation involving the Florida Senate. 3 Iam familiar with the district configurations and demographics of the proposed settlement plan, Plan 386 (see Tab 9, Attachments | and 4). Plan 386 was the product of court-ordered mediation and subsequent settlement negotiations in which the concerns of various parties were addressed. Among these concerns were: (a) making Senate District 21 more compact, particularly by eliminating the extensions to Polk County and Clearwater; (b) satisfying “one person, one vote” and contiguity requirements; (c) preserving the core of existing districts and minimizing disruption to the electoral process; and (d) preserving the political balance of the current senate districts (so as to not favor either Republicans or Democrats). 4. Plan 386 makes Senate District 21 substantially more compact. It eliminates the Polk County and Clearwater extensions of Senate District 21 and reduces the perimeter of the district by 58%. That is, the outer boundary of Senate District 21 in Plan 386 is only 42% as long as district's boundary in the current [1992] plan (Compare Tab 9, Attachment 4 with Attachment 6). Likewise, the 25 end-to-end distance between the most distant points in the district is reduced by 37 percent to less than 50 miles. Only 15 of the 40 senate districts in Florida cover less distance from end-to-end. 5. The configuration of Senate District 21 in Plan 386 is not out of line with the composition and shape of many other legislative districts in Florida (see Tab 9, Attachments 1-4, 6 and 7). Compact- ness was expressly rejected as a formal redistricting standard in 1992. Furthermore, as the attached maps show (see Tab |0, Attach- ments 8-23), it also was rejected as a redistricting practice. The relatively small African-American and Hispanic voting age popula- tion percentages in these unusually-shaped districts indicate that affording minority voters the opportunity to elect candidates of choice was not the underlying motivation.’ In fact, all 16 of the districts have white incumbents. “UNUSUALLY-SHAPED” DISTRICTS INCUMBENT %BLACK %HiIsp. Senate District 4 (Attachment 8) white 13.2 1.8 Senate District 11 (Attachment 9) white 7.6 2.4 Senate District 14 (Attachment 10) _—-white 26.3 74 Senate District 18 (Attachment 11) white 4.6 5.0 Senate District 35 (Attachment 12) white 10.1 74 House District 10 (Attachment 13) white 14.4 1.1 House District 22 (Attachment 14 white 98 3.9 House District 25 (Attachment 15) _— white 4.1 3.8 House District 32 (Attachment 16) = white 4.1 5.8 ' As used in this declaration, the term “whites” refers to persons classified in Bureau of Census publications as “non-Hispanic whites.” Similarly, the term “African-Americans” or “blacks” refers to persons classified in Census publications as “non-Hispanic blacks.” The term “Hispanics” refers to persons of “Hispanic origin (of any race).” The term “others” refers to persons not of Hispanic origin in all other racial categories used by the Census (including “American Indian, Eskimo, and Aleut,” “Asian and Pacific Islander,” and “Other Races”). The “population counts” (total population and voting age population, including distributions by race) reported in this declaration were compiled from Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Public Law (P.L.) 94-171 Data (Florida) [machine-readable data files] (1991) (see Tab 2, 1990 Census of Population). 26 “UNUSUALLY-SHAPED” DISTRICTS INCUMBENT %BLACK %HiISP. House District 36 (Attachment 17) white 43 8.2 House District 44 (Attachment 18) white 40 3.1 House District 56 (Attachment 19) _—white 73 104 House District 61 (Attachment 20) white 6.6 46 House District 66 (Attachment 21) white 5.3 8.1 House District 78 (Attachment 22) white 19.8 5.7 House District 92 (Attachment 23) white 2.3 8.5 6. Another indication of the relative unimportance of compact shapes for geopolitical boundaries in Florida is the composition of municipalities. The attached maps of municipal boundaries in the Tampa Bay Area show that unusual geographic shapes are not exclusive to legislative districts (see Tab 12, Attachments 26-28). 7.1 believe the prevalence of unusually-shaped legislative districts during the 1992 redistricting cycle was triggered not so much by a change in motivations as by fundamental changes in technology that occurred between 1982 and 1992.’ What I am suggesting is that some of the alleged “traditional redistricting principles” of the bygone era were once honored more because of *echnological limitations than as a matter of policy. As technological impediments disappeared (and decision makers discovered how easily they could shape districts in terms of incumbency or partisan considerations), the traditional standards (particularly compactness) quickly lost relevance in the political arena. ? Three major technological advances between 1982 and 1992 signifi- cantly affected the redistricting process: (1) the United States Bureau of the Census provided block level data for the entire state, resulting in a much finer level of detail for building districts; (2) the United States Bureau of the Census provided the state with the “geocoded” electronic map information that enabled the viewing of census maps on computer screens, and (3) the Florida Legislature obtained sophisticated computer hardware and software. The greater detail and accessibility of census data and the relative ease of assigning blocks to districts in 1992, combined with the wealth of data available through the Senate and House computers, gave decision makers unprecedented latitude to custom design and fine tune districts. Previously such finely detailed district drawing was either technically impossible or prohibitively ume-consuming. 27 8. Plan 386 satisfies the “one person, one vote” requirement. The “ideal” population of a senate district in Florida (based on the state’s 1990 population of 12,937,926 divided by 40 districts) is 323,448 people. In Plan 386, Senate District 22 is the most populous, with 327,422 people (deviation of +1.2 percent). Senate District 1, with 322,018 people, is the least populous (deviation of -0.4 percent). 9. Plan 386 satisfies the Florida Constitution’s contiguity requirement. It is true that Senate District 21 crosses Tampa Bay in the vicinity of the Sunshine Skyway Bridge. It is also true that several other Florida senate districts cross bays or are connected across bodies of water without bridges, including Senate District 7, Senate District 25, and Senate District 18 (see Tab 13, Attachments 29-31). The Florida Supreme Court reviewed these districts for compliance with the “contiguous territory” requirement of the Florida Constitution, and found them to be constitutional (see /n re: Constitutionality of Senate Joint Resolution 2G, Special Apportion- ment Session 1992, 597 So.2d 276 (Fla. 1992)). 10. Plan 386 preserves the core of existing districts and minimizes disruption to the electoral process. Plan 386 substan- tially modifies the shape of Senate District 21, reducing the outer perimeter of the district by 58%, while minimizing the “ripple effect” on surrounding districts (see Tab 1 [Part 1}: Population Shifts Relative to Current [1992] Senate Districts, Plan 386 - Settlement Agreement). Only six senate districts are modified by Plan 386 (Senate Districts 13, 17, 19, 21, 22 and 23). Senate District 21, which is most significantly impacted because of the detachment of approxi- mately 65,000 people in the “Polk County extension” and 15,000 people in the “Clearwater extension,” nevertheless retains more than 75% of its current population. District 23 retains 79% of its current population. Districts 13 and 17 retain better than 88% of their constituencies. District 19 retains 96% and District 22 retains virtually all its current population. Overall, only 8% of the 2.9 million people who reside in the nine Tampa Bay Area districts are dislocated by Plan 386. 11. Senators are elected to four-year, staggered terms. Regularly scheduled elections will occur in the fall of 1996 for Senate Districts 13, 17, 19, 21, and 23. Therefore, out-of-cycle elections are not 28 necessary as a result of dislocated populations in these districts, 12. The only other district modified by Plan 386 is District 22. The incumbent was just elected in the fall of 1994, and the seat will not be up again until 1998. Nevertheless, because the modifications to Senate District 22 in Plan 386 are de minimis, out-of-cycle elections are not necessary. Under Plan 386 (based on the 1990 Census’), 22 people are moved from District 22 to District 19 and 3,225 people are moved to District 22 from District 21. This is less than one percent of the population of a senate district. Data from the 1990 Census of Population and Housing put these numbers in perspective. According to the Census, 30% of the people in Senate District 22 moved into their 1990 residences from somewhere outside Pinellas County during the five years preceding the 1990 enumera- tion (another 19% moved into their 1990 residence in District 22 from locations inside Pinellas County). Even using the conservative 30% factor, this suggests that, on average, District 22 welcomes another 3,240 residents every two months. Data furnished by the Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections’ Office support the same conclusion: the percentages of new voters in the county grew an average of approximately 7% percent per year from 1992 to 1994 (see Tab 8: Mobility of Voters in Senate District 22). 13. Plan 386 does not disrupt the demographic or political charac- teristics of current senate districts. The socio-political profiles of constituencies newly-added to districts are on balance similar to those of the areas being removed. This applies particularly to the > It has now been 5% years since the 1990 enumeration. Nevertheless, the 1990 Census of Population and Housing is the most recent and only reliable basis for block-level population data. * We cannot determine what portions of this 19% had prior residences inside or outside the District 22 boundary. The analysis reported in this paragraph is based on the premise that the patterns of mobility observed in 1985-1990 project forward in time. The socioeconomic data used in this declaration were compiled from Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 3 (Florida) [machine-readable data files} (1991). 29 districts that were most substantially modified (Senate Districts 21 and 23). 14. Plan 386 modifies Senate District 21 in a manner that preserves its urban character and complements the community of interest shared by the district's existing residents. In my August 22, 1995 Declaration (filed as an attachment to Response by United States to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment), I documented that residents in the current [1992] Senate District 21 — both white and non-white — share common socioeconomic characteristics that are distinct from those of the constituencies in the surrounding districts. This same pattern holds for the modified Senate District 21 in Plan 386 (see Tab 6, Distinctive Socioeconomic Characteristics of Senate District 21). Examining 24 socioeconomic factors from the 1990 Census, District 21 in Plan 386 ranked near last (i.e., poorest) among the forty senate districts for many of the variables. Overall, its average rank was 34.5, the lowest average rank among the 40 senate districts. Thus, District 21 has a distinctively low-income character. Further, this average rank is close to the average rank for the current {1992} Senate District 21 (Plan 330), showing that the distinctive socioeconomic character is not changed much by the modifications to the current plan. 15. This demographic profile is not simply the result of a correlation between socioeconomic status and race (see Tab 7: Distinctive Socioeconomic Characteristics of District 21 — Control- ling for Race). This can be seen by examining the socioeconomic status ranking of blacks and whites in Senate District 21 (Plan 386) separately. With respect to per capita income among African- Americans, Senate District 21 ranks 15th out of 40 senate districts; with respect to per capita income among whites, Senate District 21 ranks 40th. With respect to percentages of families with income below the poverty level, the African-American families in Senate District 21 rank 3rd (in comparison to African-American families in the other forty senate districts) and the white families rank 3rd (in comparison to white families in the other forty senate districts). The measures of African-American high school and college graduates in Senate District 21 rank 11th and 25th respectively; the corresponding measures for whites rank 39th and 37th. The other socioeconomic variables reported in the table at Tab 7 follow this general pattern, 30 indicating that the white population in Senate District 21 is just as economically disadvantaged (compared with white populations in other districts) as is the African-American population in the district — in fact, more so. Thus, even when we factor out the effect of race, S District 21 exhibits strong soci pom li. ties among its residents. 16. Senate District 21 as modified in Plan 386 has a distinctly urban character. More than 95 percent of the residents live “inside an urbanized area” as designated by the United States Bureau of the Census.* 17. As configured in Plan 386, Senate District 21 would be fair for all voters; no particular group of citizens would be excluded from meaningful participation in the electoral process. Whites would comprise 48.9% of the voting age population in the district, African- Americans would comprise 36.2%, and persons of Hispanic origin would comprise 13.9%. Whites make up 59.3% of registered voters, and African-Americans make up 40.5%.° 18. Plan 386 preserves the political balance of the current senate districts (so as to not favor either Republicans or Democrats) (see Tab 3: 1994 Voter Registration). District 13, which has a Republican incumbent, slightly benefits in terms of Republican voter registration; District 17, which has a Democratic incumbent, slightly benefits in terms of Democratic voter registration; and in District 23, in which the Republican incumbent plans to retire, the modified district is “partisan neutral” relative to the current district in terms of to Districts 19, 22 and 21 are not likely to have partisan implications because the partisan swings are so small relative to the substantial current advantage for one party or the other in these districts. * See Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 3 (Florida) [machine-readable data files] (1991). For definition of “inside an urbanized area,” see Bureau of the Census, Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 3 Technical Documentation (1991), pp. Al1-A12[.] * Available voter registration data [} do not classify persons of Hispanic origin, so “Whites” plus “Blacks” plus “Others” add to 100 percent. 31 19. An alternative plan submitted to the Court by C. Martin Lawyer, Ill, configures Senate District 21 to fit entirely in Hillsborough County. Compared to Plan 386, which dislocates less than 25% of the people in any single district and 8% of the people in the nine Tampa Bay area districts combined, the C. Martin Lawyer, III, plan dislocates more than 60% of the current constituents of Senate District 21, and more than 25% in the nine Tampa Bay area districts combined (see Tab 1 [Part 2]: Population Shifts Relative to Current [1992] Senate Districts, Plan 382 - Martin Lawyer). As a result, 738,733 people would be moved out of their current districts and into new districts, as compared to only 235,875 in Plan 386. Mr. Lawyer’s plan also splits DeSoto, Hardee and Hernando Counties (all of which are wholly contained in senate districts in the current [1992] plan and in Plan 386) (see Tab 5 [Part 1]: Number of Districts per County). Likewise, the Lawyer plan extends Senate District 17 to include five counties, compared with four in the current [1992] plan and three in Plan 386 (see Tab 5 [Part 2]: Number of Counties per District). Mr. Lawyer’s design for District 21, while confined to a single county, exhibits twists and turns along its boundary similar to those in both the current (Plan 330) and the modified (Plan 386) Senate District 21. (Compare Tab 11, Attachment 24 with Attach- ment 25). 20. Six of the twelve house districts in Hillsborough County extend beyond the county’s boundary to include territories in other counties. For example, House District 55 covers parts of Hillsborough, Pinellas, and Manatee Counties (the same three counties as Senate District 21 in Plan 386), and House Districts 47 and 48 both straddle the Hillsborough-Pinellas County line. 21. Respect for county boundaries was not a traditional redistrict- ing principle in Florida in 1992. To the contrary, county boundaries often were intentionally split to provide counties with increased representation in the Senate.’ Fifteen senate districts besides the ’ Many Senators believed that having multiple representatives in the Senate provided counties better representation. As an example, it was argued that two counties are better served sharing two Senators than if they each have a single Senator. 32 current Senate District 21 (in Plan 330) included all or parts of four or more counties (see Tab 4, Numbers of Counties per Senate District). Significantly, all but one of those 16 districts contained more partial counties than whole counties. This clearly indicates that county splits were not necessary to comply with “one person, one vote” requirements. For instance, Senate District 5 in north Florida includes parts of nine counties, none of which is wholly contained in the district. Senate District 4, which reaches from Tallahassee to Fernandina Beach and then south below Crystal River to the Citrus- Hernando County line, includes 18 counties, only seven of which are wholly contained within the district. Senate District 35 stretches across the state from West Palm Beach to Fort Myers, and only one of its six counties is wholly contained in the district. Of the six senate districts composed of four counties, only two (Senate District 10 and Senate District 29) contain even one whole county. The remaining districts (Senate Districts 12, 17, 21 and 27) are composed entirely of parts of counties. Statewide, only 24 counties are wholly con- tained in a single district; the remaining 43 counties are split between two or more districts. 22. Approaching the relationship between senate district and senate districts are wholly contained within a single county: five in Dade County and one each in Broward, Hillsborough, Pinellas and Volusia. 23. The bill language and statistics for Plan 386, attached at Tab 14, are a true and accurate depiction of the modified boundaries for Senate Districts 13, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 23 approved and recom- ee ee * Senate District 21 in the current [1992] plan includes parts of Hills- borough, Pinellas, Manatee and Polk Count[ies}. Under the settlement agreement the Polk extension is eliminated, so the modified Senate District in Plan 386 crosses into only three counties. 33 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. TAB I: TAB 2: TAB 3: TAB 4: TAB 5: TAB 6: TAB 7: TAB 8 /s/ John Guthrie John Guthrie Date: November 16, 1995 LIST OF TABLES Population Shifts Relative to Current [1992] Senate Dis- tricts Plan 386 - Settlement Agreement [see p. 37] Plan 382 - Martin Lawyer [see p. 38] 1990 Census of Population [see pp. 39-41} 1994 Voter Registration [see pp. 42-44] Number of Counties per Senate District [see pp. 45-46] Relationships between Districts and Counties Number of Districts per County: Tampa Bay Area [see p. 47] Number of Counties per District: Tampa Bay Area [see p. 48] peteaten tes _ — District 21 [see pp. 49-50] Distinctive Soci ic Ch istics of S District 21 — Controlling for Race [see p. 51] : Mobility of Voters in Senate District 22 [see p. 52] Ad LIST OF ATTACHMENTS TAB 9: District Maps TAB 10: Attachment 1: Settlement Agreement - Plan 386 (Statewide) [see p. 53] Attachment 2: Current [1992] Senate Districts - Plan 330 (Statewide) [see p. 54] Attachment 3: Current [1992] House Districts - Plan 352 (Statewide) [see p. 55] Attachment 4: Settlement Agreement - Plan 386 (Tampa Bay Area) [see p. 56] Attachment 5: C. Martin Lawyer, III - Plan 382 (Tampa Bay Area) [see p. 57] Attachment 6: Current [1992] Senate Districts - Plan 330 (Tampa Bay Area) [see p. 58] Attachment 7: Current [1992] House Districts - Plan 352 (Tampa Bay Area) [see p. 59] U lly-Shaped Distri Attachment 8: Senate District 4 [see p. 60] Attachment 9: Senate District 11 [see p. 61] Attachment 10: Senate District 14 [see p. 62] Attachment 11: Senate District 18 [see p. 63] Attachment 12: Senate District 35 [see p. 64] Attachment 13: House District 10 [see p. 65] Attachment 14: House District 22 [see p. 66] Attachment 15: House District 25 [see p. 67] Attachment 16: House District 32 [see p. 68] Attachment 17: House District 36 [see p. 69] Attachment 18: House District 44 [see p. 70] Attachment 19: House District 56 [see p. 71] Attachment 20: House District 61 [see p. 72] 35 Attachment 21: House District 66 [see p. 73] SLB‘SEZ 0 LI8'S9 S?Z'E PvOL'08 0 SLO'ZI OST'BE PrL'Se O pesueyD T8P'ELG'T BBO'TZE S8T'TZE TZH'LZE TEP'EZE OEL'PZE LOS‘ZZE OGEZZE SLY'ETE IBS'PZE 98BEd B86cce BRO TL OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9% ZES‘eZE 0 89r'9S7 0 976'EP 0 0 0 SEl'eZ 0 €Z 6IZ'PZE 0 0 L6I'bZE 0 0 77 0 0 0 zz OSE'EZE 0 O9I'LZ S@Z'E 399'%Pz O €so'%l Osz'se 0 0 17 9EE'PZE O 0 0 0 9EEPZE 0 0 0 0 0z S60°EZE 0 0 0 0 0 Z6r'Ol€ O 909°Z71 0 61 cos'z7zZE 0 Lso'8e 0 0 0 0 Ovl'P8Z 0 0 LI 69S'PZE 0 0 0 SES'9E 0 0 0 1€L'L87 0 €l Igs‘pze 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Isspze = OO “Ottd ~ 9 €z rad Iz 0z 61 LI €l O01 ousig Attachment 22: House District 78 [see p. 74! Attachment 23: House District 92 [see p. 75] O€E NVId H.LIM (98€ NV1d) LNSWaaYOY LNAWALLLYS JO NOSIYVdWOD [7 dO | LUVd] (O€E NVId) SLORILSIG ALYNAS [7661] LNTWAND OL FALLY TAY SLAIH§ NOLLV'1NdOd ‘| @VL TAB 11: Comparison of District 21 in Settlement Plan and Lawyer Plan Attachment 28: Bradenton and Palmetto (municipal boundaries) [see p. 80] Attachment 30: Senate District 25 (Example of district crossing water) [see p. 82] Attachment 31: Senate District 18 (Example of district Attachment 29: Senate District 7 (Example of district crossing water) [see p. 83] crossing water) [see p. 81] Elections Estimates by District, see pp. 118-125) 1994 Voter Registration by District, see pp. 110-117 Attachment 27: Plant City to Winter Haven (municipal boundaries) [see p. 79] Attachment 26: Pinellas Park to Clearwater (municipal boundaries) [see p. 78} Attachment 25: Senate District 21 - C. Martin Lawyer, Ill, Plan [see p. 77] Attachment 24: Senate District 21 - Settlement Agree- ment [see p. 76] Bill Language and Statistics for Plan 386 [Bill Language, see pp. 84-98 District Statistics by County, see pp. 102-109 Contiguity Across Bodies of Water District Statistics, see pp. 99-100 Plan Comparison Report, see p. 101 Municipal Boundaries TAB 12 TAB 13: TAB 14 37 ['€ wed ‘Z GUL Ie NOU deg “Bed yxoU UO ponuNUOD a1qe]] %P'v %S'P %$'9 %b'S %S°S duedsip] % %8'0 %8'0 %8°0 %6'°0 %6'0 PYIO % %1'ZI EL EPI %8'PI %7°6 YORI % %L'78 %E'L8 %P'8L %6°8L %b' Ps aNYUM % PII EPI SL 1 %07I Lvl D1uedsiH] % %9'I %9 | Pl = 1 %8'l %L'| INO % %97Z Ee %0'€ %P'€ ARI % 888 | %E ER % 108 2UUM % ot i __tEED See SLE ECE | 69s'ye a a b6t [HOT bse %S'E %S'€ a, — [BLO %LO = HHO HBO HB'N INO % [ety err 696 [%6% = | %E'P PRI % -CO = | METH | HO'9B = | H8'06 = | %B'06 OUYAA % 7! eb SSC SEO HCE Igs'ves 18S"pze qwnod _ 01 TSE VBld | OSE UeId O€E URId AMET | juowsasy | siinsiq we mIey uawameg | “wag 2661 IUISI] aeUIg uoneindog [BIC [€ dO | LYVd] NOLLV1NdOd dO SASNAD 0661 :Z aVvL C£L'8EL 198'6h 97E'69 YZI'OE CO7'S6I SBL'S6 O 911°88 1ZO0'ZOI $67‘801 pesueyD ZRP'EIG'T LOO'ZZE BOI'STE OES'PTE OZ ITE T6Z'PTE BOO'ETE ESI'ETE CENSTE SEO PTE C8td S86 cece “OPI eLz O 0 0 0 0 TPs OS O 0 92 ZESEZTE OLNTI ZBL'SSz O Ips'es 0 0 0 6es'i 0 t@ 617 rze 0 0 vOr'r6z 0 ci8'6z 0 0 0 0 wZ QSE'ETE IG6I'LE O80'6Z 89Ivl EZP'9TI OLESO O ci68z 0 609° 17 4 9EE'P7E 0 LIL‘'9€ SBS6'SI PSI'EP LOS'87Z 0 0 0 0 0@ g60°E7E 0 0 0 0 0 860°EZE O 0 0 6l a cOs'zze 0 oso'l 0 0 0 0 Leo'sez O 989°98 LI 69S'PzE 0 6rr'7 OO 80S°86 0 0 0 ZI9E7Z O tl Igseze 0 0 0 0 0 0 6S¢'8 7Z8P'OOI OPL'SIz Ol Ottd 9% x4 (a4 17 0@ 6l LI tl Ol puisiqd O€E NV'ld HLIM ([78¢] NV1d) I] ‘YAAMY’] NLLYVP “D dO NOSIYVdWOD [7 dO Z LUV] (OEE NV1d) SLOPELSIG SLYNAS [7661] LNABAND OL SALLY TSY SLAIHS NOLLY1NdOd *| @V.L [.. US 7661, S¥ ad9y PoreuTisap jeurTu0 ui . s!LISIpP juoUIN.,,) Aoud UI popeys ase (7 gE UBIG) URIYg AME] URW > ay) Aq PeyTpoul aue ING (ORE UR][q) UIWEAITY jUSWEINEg ay) Aq PolyIPOU JOU aze YOIYR SI9LNSIG) BON %L0 %8'0 %8'0 %1'9 %1'9 E88 = %L0 3 %L'06 41 [€ dO € LYVd] NOLLV1NdOd 4O SNSNED 0661 °Z AVL ["¢ ued “Z GUL We 20U dag “aBed }xou UO ponuNUO? aq" [} %6 Cl %Y 6 ®7 LI %L €l %S 6 suedsiy % %1'I %6'0 %L'I %I'I %6'0 IO % 79 %0' SP LI %2' IP %7'0S YORI % %®L oP Sy vs aoe %S 6 NUM % OO it< Ce : , € %1 7 SI'P % %L'I 17 17 %6'1 1 %PT ®P'Z JOO % S71 a SVT %9' v1 667 %6'7 WRIA % %8°€8 %8'16 %8'16 %8'08 %9'06 %9'06 UA % |ustiose _|sci'ssc__}sti'se__hzerives _toee'ves _toce ret uno) _ 0% = %0'7 %0°7 %0'7 %77Z %77Z %7'7Z s1uedsip{ % %8'0 %8°0 %8'0 %0' I %0' | %0'| 12YIO % %7'I %9°7Z %T I %9'1 %®P'€ %9' I YORE % %1°96 %9 P6 % 1°96 TU S6 ®Pd' £6 %7'S6 2NYAA % $6S'89%_ | £S6'997 $6S°897 ‘Eze |LOS‘ZZE | R60'EZE wnod 61 ZSE Wid | 98E URid | OLE URid Wid | 98E UXid | OLE UPid yokmey | wowso3y |] siousid yoke] | wuowsady | siouisiq UNSIG 918UIS ane _“Uag 7661 | UI | wouajes | “UES 7661 Ph. uoneindog ay 3uNOA uoneindog [B0} [¢ dO Z LUVd] NOLLV1NdOd dO SNSNAD 0661 -7 AVL ['€ Med “€ Qe We a0U dag ‘aBed yxou UO ponuNUOD a4qQe 1) %E6S OC7TL 1%L'6P ZBP'LS SIMO A PIUISIBIY B1y A £666 |[%99 399° Souq JOUIW % sjUspusdepuy | vlv'lZ 1%60Z 801'bZ suvoiqnday 1 770° s . : é ot*co Rte eect | — sear rm at ‘891 |(%8'L6) 90I's9r 83210 oud «| %SOT = OOLL'ST | Sonmeg sour 2 syuspuedopuy S¢€ 06L'bL suvotqndoy ‘DU Y %T0 Z6P S190 A PalaistBoy 20ey J9y1C SOL 90% i407 vI0'r | %0'! 9S0°Z S190 A PosaistBoy you] g 886 BSILLOT}%8L6 §8=PSL'0OT | H8'RG =~ BILLOZ $1990 A PosaisiBay ay AK WIZ! 16E'ST wiz! overs Jaz: 16E'sz_| sonmeg som 7 swuopusdepuy 6h «19M POI |%IG6r SLL‘OO1 |%L'6r 1 9%'vO! suvoiqnday 0 10 §OLI %70 692 $19}0 oy sey lO ) A Pasaisiday aony 190 < 61062 |%S0rP 6676 |wHODS ~>P>B'LS SIMO A pasasiBay youig %8'8E _99S'6L |%7RE __PIP'OR swsI0WIA] 6 (98 UeId) (OEE Wid) wud wowamrog ; JOUISIC] aeUDg [€ dO 7 LUVd] NOLLVALSIOAY WALLOA 661 °€ AVL ['€ ued ‘€ GUL Ie 210U dag ‘oded }xou UO ponuNUOS aq") 701 ISI'bl 1%09 698°8 SINOA Paasioy yuig %8'88 I166°%Z1 |%0E6 pSP'9El SINOA PIISIBIY YAK ®E'P 1865 |%Sr 9€5°9 Saiwied JOUIW] 7% sJUapusdepu] %68E OZ6'ES 1%OIP S90'I9 sueotqnday GES _760'6L _ ! %10 YZ SINO A IBIYy IY 124y1O IZ S66E |%87 86l'% [%7TE 8627'S SINOA PoasiZoy YouIg %9L6 6EI'881 1%0'L6 060°L91 |%L96 = £61 091 SIDIOA POsDISIBIY BY %8'O1 IPL'OT |%I'Il ZrO'6! 1%L°01 ORL | Sonmeg s0UNW 7 suspusdepuy [¢ dO | LUVd] NOLLVELSIONY WALOA 9661 *€ AVL 43 a —~T one OoOoeH HNO OCOfOolon He OOo Cc oO 11 4 9 5 5 5 5 4 Tm Ftitieq mma mmnmn 18 11 9 7 6 5 5 5 “ ) Ff Titisy =< emmmn FOMHArnrosaREAcinipSge vga TAB 4: NUMBER OF COUNTIES PER SENATE DISTRICT [PART | OF 2} een nee (ruse 306) | 1992 Senate Plan (Plan 330) District |Counties | Partial | Whole | District [Counties | Partial | Whole 7 7 0 2 1 0 0 1 [Table continued on next page. See note at Tab 4, Part 2.) 3 - NO CSC CoO- = CO SCOIOIC oO =FTAnn nn te mreeeananamn aioio a Srarennnnne ee ce am aioioa a Tene s IPOS REAIOKRSR © VIRIZ o@ 7S +2) a [.. U2 Z661,, 9 2494 PoreUs!sp jeuITUO uF ,,sIUNSIP jWaLIN,,] “Aud uy popeys aye (Z7RE URIq) ULld J2Ame] UIE “D ay Kg paryipows aue yng (QgE UB{q) OWI JUsWEINeEg 24) Aq PoLy!POU! JOU azw YOIYM S}OUISI] :20N - 7 ra ; act Ckyg . JOIC a! We C %9'r «0689 S10 A posaisiBoy 4Oe1G %PS6 vLOT>PI SIMO A PIUIIsIFIy BWIY A 4 %O'1L OLP'OT | Sonmeg J0Ul; 2 sjopucdopu] %L 7% 9L8'E9 suvoyqnday %E Saeco tae SIDIOA IB9Y YORI (%9'°86] €9¢'061 $1910 A PAsasiBoy 14M S711 SIZ | Somseg sou; = sjuepusdepuy %TIS €€8°86 suestqnday OLE BOSTL syes90wlad] 77 (O€E UPId) OLISIC] BBUIS SIOUISI "UIE 7661 — [¢ dO € LUVd] NOLLVULSIOSY ASALOA P66! °€ AVL TAB 4: NUMBER OF COUNTIES PER SENATE DISTRICT [PART 2 OF 2] Settlement Agrmt. (Plan 386) | 1992 Senate Plan (Plan 330) District [Counties] Partial | Whole | District |Counties | Partial | Whole 13 2 2 0 13 2 2 0 14 2 2 0 14 2 2 0 18 2 2 0 18 2 2 0 19 2 2 0 19 2 2 0 20 2 2 0 20 2 2 0 23 2 2 0 25 2 2 0 25 2 2 0 28 2 2 0 28 2 2 0 30 2 2 0 30 2 2 0 31 2 a 31 2 2 0 32 2 2 0 32 2 2 0 40 2 1 1 40 2 1 1 16 1 1 0 16 1 l 0 = 1 0 22 l 1 0 23 1 1 0 33 1 1 0 33 1 1 0 34 1 1 0 34 1 1 0 36 l 1 0 36 l I 0 37 1 1 ) 37 1 1 0 38 1 1 0 38 1 1 0 39 1 1 0 = «(1 1 0 Total 142 118 ##=$%24 | Total 142 118 2 Note: Under the 1992 Florida House and Senate redistricting plans, 6 of the 12 house districts in Hillsborough County and 3 [of] the 4 senate districts extend out to include other counties. Overall, 9 of the 16 legislative districts in Hillsborough County include other counties (only 7 of 16 are wholly contained in Hillsborough County). [PART | OF 2] TAB 5: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DISTRICTS AND COUNTIES 17, 26 2 17,26 10, 13 17 17, 26 2 4 17, 26 47 4 13,21, 23, 26 13, 20, 21, 23 13, 17, 20, 21, 23 2 21,26 19, 20, 21, 22 10, 17, 23 2 24,26 10, 11 J. 27 17, 35 10, 13, 19 2 21,26 2 3 4 3 19, 20, 21, 22 10, 17, 21 2 24,26 10, 11 2 17, 35 10, 13, 19 2 3 4 3 28 17 ae” xa 4“ DAA ww HaHa AeA HA A A aw - : gi@e% & 8 Ree & F< Fs Aa ex ite & S “A wv OA co Wm ™ oO oO “A “nN ™ nO AW cE [be ihe 6 Elasic as S 8 BRR = 8 & QPeQse ee F ; - : 5 3 2 ¥ v gf £58 ., 3B ¢ go > E Su If > & $. 3 S 2 > 3 rs) Slab nia Fp Lab a i afis 5B filiels! $53 = SF SAP Ret eee glared , ? Fy 3 SNRs 3 HTT i : PATSISTESEPEIELSISIBLETE $ JOMUNS “MANS “RIOSLIBS 4D “H]Oq-]0d ‘SEIJI g-Uid ‘OISEg-SDq ‘32qG0Y422240-299 ‘soyeuR-uDp “YSnosogs||IH-71H “spuryysiy]-8147 ‘opuewiay-sa4y ‘2apsey-s0py ‘OlOSeq-Saq :suoneiaaiqqgy Ajuno> €Z PZ SZ ROL, 78S “URN “IIH “IPH ‘S29 “SC seg ‘ue “SiH ‘eH ‘seq “S aeg ‘ueyy “Sip “EY ‘soqd $ 9 tH I od ‘tH Z WH I €z ulg | uid | Wd | 2 tH I ulg ‘URW ‘YH ¢ od ‘Ug ‘WAH p [2 Ug | Ud ‘TH Z Wd ‘TH Z 02 oo Ulg ‘seq 7 Uld ‘stg Z Uid ‘Std Z 6] ol [Od ‘240 “Sty ‘wey ‘seq = 19d ‘240 ‘SIZ ¢ Od ‘HO TH SIH bp LI sed ‘WH ‘JOH € sed ‘WH Z Std‘H ZZ €i WING ‘JO ‘seq ‘IO pp WING ‘[Og ‘Seq ‘JOH p WINS [Od ‘seq ‘PH pb Of sonunod “a sonuno> “a sonunod “a | (Z8E weld) (98¢ eid) (O€E UeId) rousia | LORILSIC| Yad SALLNNOD 4O YaSWAN [7 dO Z LUVd] SALLNNOD ANY SLOPALSIC] NSEM.LAG SdIHSNOLLV TAY °C VL TAB 6: DISTINCTIVE SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SENATE DISTRICT 21 [PART 2 OF 2] TAB 7: DISTINCTIVE SOCIOBCONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SENATE DISTRICT 21 —- CONTROLLING FOR RACE Agrmt. | 1992 Senate Plan | Weighted 386 Pesuiuinn tinal ol (Plan 386) (Plan 330) Senate District 21 y ‘ \(out of 40) out of 9) (out of 40) out of 9)} Number of persons per 25 8 30 9 dwelling unit (reversed) Inside an urbanized area 25 6 23 6 (reversed) Vacant housing units (re- 27 4 26 5 versed) Married-couple house- 39 9 39 9 holds Non-family households 36 7 32 7 (reversed) Born in Florida (reversed) 37 y 38 Changed residences 30 6 34 8 within last 5 years Persons age 65 and older 23 8 23 8 The “average rank” of Senate District 21 on these 24 factors is 34.5 in the Settlement Agreement and 35.9 in the 1992 Senate Plan. In both plans, Senate District 21 ranks lowest of the 40 districts in Florida on these 24 socioeconomic factors. Note: Senate District 21 is ranked relative to all forty senate districts in Florida (“State”) and relative to the nine districts in the Tampa Bay area (“T-Bay” — the seven Surrounding districts, Senate Districts 10, 13, 17, 20, 22, 23, and 26, plus Senate District 19). Note: /talics indicate the “directionality” of a ranking has been reversed to make a rank of 40 (or 9 in the “T-Bay” column) the “extreme benchmark” for all socioeconomic factors. For example, a ranking of 38 on unemployment means Senate District 21 has the 3rd highest unemployment rate. 50 Weighted Population of Senate District 21 (Plan 386) (out of 40) | (out of 40) Per Capita Income 39 15 39 Family income below pov- 38 38 38 erty level (reversed) Unemployment Rate (re- 37 33 39 versed) High school graduates 37 11 39 College graduates 38 25 37 Dwellings with no vehicle 39 37 38 (reversed) Monthly rent of $500 or 32 20 33 more Mortgage of $700 or more 38 23 39 Owner-occupied dwellings 38 18 38 Number of persons per 25 34 9 dwelling unit (reversed) Married-couple households 39 23 38 Non-family households (re- 36 38 35 versed) Persons age 65 and older 23 - 10 20 Note: Italics indicate the “directionality” of a ran/.ing has been reversed to make a rank of 40 (or 9 in the “T-Bay” column) the “extreme benchmark” for all socioeconomic factors. For example, a ranking of 38 on unemployment means Senate District 2] has the 3rd highest unemployment rate. The socioeconomic factors not reported in this table were excluded because data broken down by race were not available in the STF-3 Census tabulation. 51 TAB 8: MOBILITY OF VOTERS IN SENATE DISTRICT 22 (PLAN 330) Year ending December 31 . . . 1992 1993 1994 Registered voters in Pinellas County New registered voters in Pinellas County (per year) New registered voters in Pinellas County (cumulative) Percentage of new voters (per year) Percentage of new voters (cu- mulative) Registered voters in District 22 Estimate of new voters in Dis- trict 22 (per year) Estimate of new voters in Dis- trict 22 (cumulative) 513,752 470,669 531,377 72,456 16,053 28,579 72,456 88,509 117,088 14.1% 3.4% 5.4% 14.1% 18.8% 22.0% 103.465 95,043 106,982 ) 14,108 3,242 5,754 ; 14,108 17,350 23,104 7 : Another indication of the mobility of residents in Pinellas County is | provided by the 1990 Census of Population and Housing. According to the Census, 48.81% of the Population in District 22 moved into and 29.51% of the Population moved from another county during this same five years (Summary Tape File 3 (Florida) [machine-readable data files} (1991)). their 1990 residence during the five years preceding the 1990 Census | | 52 TAB 9: DISTRICT MAPS Attachment |: Settlement Agreement - Plan 386 (Statewide) [Black & white depiction of color original] SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PLAN 386 Florida Senate 53 TAB 9: DISTRICT MAPS Attachment 2: Current [1992] Senate Districts - Plan 230 (Statewide) [Black & white depiction of color original] CURRENT SENATE DISTRICTS PLAN 330 TAB 9: DISTRICT MAPS Attachment 3: Current [1992] House Districts - Plan 352 (Statewide ) [Black & white depiction of color original | CURRENT HOUSE DISTRICTS PLAN 352 Florida Senate 54 Florida Senate 55 TAB 9: DISTRICT MAPS Attachment 4: Settlement Agreement - Plan 386 (Tampa Bay Area) [Black & white depiction of color original] SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PLAN 386 TAMPA BAY AREA Florida Senate _ 56 TAB 9: DISTRICT MAPS Attachment 5: C. Martin Lawyer, III - Plan 382 (Tampa Bay Area) [Black & white depiction of color original } C. MARTIN LAWYER, III PLAN 382 TAMPA BAY AREA ne. : > 4 A bo 4 S ia» ' | se j # + ° ee baaeaeaiaall en ee sm Goueatinenl / Shoreline r Florida Senate $7 TAB 9: DisTRICT MAPS Attachment 6: Current [1992] Senate Districts - Plan 330 (Tampa Bay Area) [Black & white depiction of color original} CURRENT SENATE DISTRICTS PLAN 330 TAMPA BAY AREA -_—-—o ow ——e eer m-rer ~~’ 10 ; ~ _ Pros . = " ntti, said eS en a Va ae Florida Senate 58 — Te . . TAB 9: DisTRICT MAPS Attachment 7: Current [1992] House Districts - Plan 352 (Tampa Bay Area) [Black & white depiction of color original] CURRENT HOUSE DISTRICTS PLAN 352 TAMPA BAY AREA rere ‘o." Ay Florida Senate a 59 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 8 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] STATE SENATE DISTRICT 4 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 9 [Black & white depiction of color original; census twact lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] Statute Miles altel tit a Le 0 25 $0 STATE SENATE DISTRICT 11 60 $0 Statute Miles ee eee =e 0 ) 18 61] TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 10 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] STATE SENATE DISTRICT 14 * —" Sey — Statute Miles ert f T T T Se ee 0 6 i2 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment | 1 {Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format} ce STATE SENATE DISTRICT 18 Statute Miles L > _ oe anathema 0 12 24 63 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 12 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 13 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format) STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 10 STATE SENATE DISTRICT 35 r — —E —Ghews ——E Statute Miles iL i ne em i 3 0 15 30 - 3 Statute Miles ——S—Se Se wee ee tre = a 0 25 50 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 14 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 15 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 22 STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 25 \ EE " ae Statute Miles woe a 1S 0 9 18 66 » Statute Miles — - i i. i —— sa 0 6 12 67 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 16 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format} TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 17 [Black & white depiction of color orginal; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 36 STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 32 \ Statute Miles L i i LL i i J 0 9 18 To tae ne gst a ox Statute Miles real — 4 68 69 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 18 [Black & white depiction of color orginal; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 44 Statute Mies i — TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 19 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 56 Statute Miles ; a —_—_—_——— ae er oer —_—— 18 = t) raat a 9 70 TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 20 . Attachment 2! {Black & white depiction of color original; census tract ; [Black & white depiction of color original, census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] . lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 61 | STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 66 | ~~! Ww ’ Lyra wr oes -| a rye . Mile Oana) Statute Miles ¢ tatute Miles .. SS, ‘2 tt ; 5 5 a {) 6 1? oe : {) 12 24 7) I TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS TAB 10: UNUSUALLY-SHAPED DISTRICTS Attachment 22 Attachment 23 {Black & white depiction of color original; census tract [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format) STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 78 : STATE HOUSE DISTRICT 92 ——— ee eee -_ 74 | 75 TAB 11: COMPARISON OF DISTRICT 21 IN SETTLEMENT PLAN AND LAWYER PLAN Attachment 24 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] DIST. 21 - SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT L i. aie L — ied : 0 9 18 BUF Da 7 « Statute Miles 76 : . : TAB 11: COMPARISON OF DISTRICT 21 IN SETTLEMENT PLAN AND LAWYER PLAN Attachment 25 [Black & white depiction of color orginal; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] DIST. 21 -C. M. LAWYER PLAN Statute Miles -_ _, _~ 4 J 0 2 4 77 NICIPAL BOUNDARIES TAB 12: MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES TAB 12: MU to aa 7 1; census tract [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract _ [Black & white depiction of co on c aol lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] lines removed and legend box modified to fit smalle PLANT CITY TO WINTER HAVEN PINELLAS PARK TO CLEARWATER TAB 12: MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES Attachment 28 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format] BRADENTON AND PALMETTO TAB 13: CONTIGUITY ACROSS BODIES OF WATER Attachment 29 {Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format; land within district depicted in dark gray, water in light gray] rt 7 - STATE SENATE DISTRICT 7 80 81 TAB 13: CONTIGUITY ACROSS BODIES OF WATER Attachment 30 [Black & white depiction of color original; census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format: land within district depicted in dark gray, water in light gray | STATE SENATE DISTRICT 25 led 82 TAB 13: CONTIGUITY ACROSS BODIES OF WATER Attachment 31 {Black & white depiction of color orginal, census tract lines removed and legend box modified to fit smaller format, land within district depicted in dark gray, water in light gray) STATE SENATE DISTRICT 18 a | . 4 o~ a" 83 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE Note: “Plan 386” would modify districts 13, 17, 19, 21, 22 and 23 of the Senate apportionment plan set out in s. 3, Senate Joint Resolution 2G (1992), as amended by In re Constitutionality of Senate Joint Resolution 2G, Special Apportionment Session 1992, 601 So 2d $43 (Fla. 1992). The remaining 34 Senate districts would not be affected. (1) District 13 is composed of: (a) That part of Hillshorough County made up of tract(s) 4, 5, 14, 15, 59, 110.01, 110.03, 111.01, 111.02, $12.03, 112.04, 112.05, 112.06, 113.01, 113.02, 114.02, 114.03, 114.04, 114.05, 113.01, 115.02, 115.03, 116.01, 116.02, 116.03, 116.04, 116.05, 117.02, 117.03, 117.04, 118.01, 118.02, 119.01, 119.02; of tract 6 block(s) 107, 108, 128, 137, 142, 143, 144, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 240, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 439, 440, 441, 442, 444, 445, 446, of tract 12 block(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 308, 309, 310, 313, 315, 316, 317, 320, 401, 402, 403, 404, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 414; of tract 13 block(s) 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, $12, 513, 514; of tract 26 block(s) 106, 108, 111, 112, 113, 114, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 201, 202, 203, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 312, 313, 401, 402, 403, 404, 407, 408, 507, 508, 509, 510, $11, 512, $13, 514, 515, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 801, 802A, 802B, 802C, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, $18, 819, $20, 821, $22, $23, 824, 825, 826, 827, 828, 829, $30, 899; of tract 46 block(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 327, 399, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 497, 408, 409, 411, 412, 433; of tract 47 block(s) 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 301, 302, 303, 304, 306, 307, 309, 311, 312, 313, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 425, 426, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, $09, 510, $11, 512, 525, 527, 529, 533, 534; of wact 48 block(s) 501, 502, 503, 519, 601, 602, 603, 604; of wact 57 block(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 501, 502, 503, 504, S05, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, $12, $13, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, of tract 102.01 block(s) 201, 202, 203, 204, 399E, 406, 407, 408A, 408B, 409A, 409B, 410A, 410D, 411, 412, 413, 84 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 414A, 414B, 424A, 425A, 425B, 426A, 427A, 499A, 4996; of tract 108.05 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211A, 211B, 212, 213, 214A, 214B; of tract 108.07 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 113, 114, 11S, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121; of tract 110.04 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106A, 106B, 107, 108A, 108B, 109, 110, 111, 112, 118A, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206A, 206B, 207A, 207B, 208A, 208B, 209A, 209B, 209C, 209D, 209E, 210A, 210B, 210C, 211A, 211B, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224A, 299, 301A, 301B, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 399, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, S11, 512, SISA, 516, 517; of wact 119.03 block(s) 510, 511, 512, 524, 525A, 525B, 526A, 526B, 527, 528, 601, 602B, 603, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 611, 616A, 616B, 701, 702, 706, 712, 713. (b) That part of Pasco County made up of tract(s) 310, 313, 316, 317.01; of tract 309 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 199, 201, 202, 203A, 203B, 203C, 203D, 204, 205, 206, 224A, 224B, 225A, 225B, 228A, 228B, 229A, 229B, 237A, 237B, 237C, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269A, 269B, 270A, 270B, 271A, 271B, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279A, 279B, 299, SOLA, 501B, 502A, 502B, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, SIOA, SIOB, S10C, 511, 512, 513, $14, 515; of tract 312.02 block(s) 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 11S, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 199, 218, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 299; of tract 317.02 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 199. (2) District 17 is composed of: (a) That part of Highlands County made up of BNA(s) 9601 , 9602, 9603, 9604, 9605, 9607, 9608, 9609, 9610, 9611; of BNA 9606 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 198, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371A, 371 B, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 399; of BNA 9612 block(s) 101A, 101B, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 226, 306. (b) That part of Okeechobee County made up of BNA(s) 9901, 9902, 9903. (c) That part of Polk County made up of tract(s) 101, 102, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109, 110, 117.03, 117.04, 118.03, 125, 126, 127, 134, 135, 137.01, 137.02, 138.01, 138.02, 139.01, 139.02, 140.01, 140.02, 141, 141.01, 141.02, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160; of tract 103 block(s) 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 199, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 201A, 201B, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233A, 233B, 234A, 234B, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244A, 244B, 245, 246, 299, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333; of tract 106.01 block(s) 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227A, 227B, 228A, 228B, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 237, 238; of tract 106.02 block(s) 101, 102A, 102B, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112A, 112B, 112C, 112D, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141A, 199A, 199B, 199C, 199D, 199E, 199F, 199G, 199H, 199], 199K; of tract 111 block(s) 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 211, 301, 302A, 302B, 302C, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310A, 310B, 311, 312, 313A, 313B, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321A, 321B, 321C, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326; of tract 112.02 block(s) 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 138, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 304, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 330, of tract 113 block(s) 210, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227; of tact 117.02 block(s) 103A, 103B, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 11S, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 201, 202A, 202B, 202C, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312; of tract 120.98 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105A, 105B, 105C, 105D, 10S5E, 105F, 105G, 10SH, 106A, 107A, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120A, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147A, 147B, 147C, 148, 149A, 149B, 154A, 154B, 155, 156, 157, 158, 181, 185, 188, 189, 190, 401, 402, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421A, 421B, 421C, 421D, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 440A, 440B, 441, 442A, 442B, 443A, 443B, 444A, 444B, 445A, 445B, 446A, 446B, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452A, 452B, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 463, 464, 465, 466, 467; of tract 128 block(s) 217, 218, 219, 222A, 222B, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232A, 232B, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, of tract 129 block(s) 101A, 101B, 101C, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 199, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 199, 201A, 201B, 201C, 202, 203, 204A, 204B, 205, 206, 299A, 299B, 299C, 302, 304, 305, 306, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 318, 319, 320, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327A, 327B, 327C, 327D, 328A, 328B, 329, 332B, 399A, 399C, 401A, 401B, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 413, 462, 464; of tract 130 block(s) 114, 125A, 125B, 130C, 132; of tract 131 block(s) 423A, 423B; of tract 132 block(s) 101A, 101B, 101C, 102A, 102B, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, L11A, 111B, 112A, 112B, 113A, 113B, 113C, 114, LISA, 115B, 116A, 116B, 116C, 116D, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124A, 124B, 125, 126, 127, 201, 218, 219, 234; of tract 133 block(s) 101A, 101B, 102A, 102B, 103A, 103B, 103C, 104, 105, 106A, 106B, 107A, 107B, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 131, 132, 199, 201A, 201B, 201C, 202A, 202B, 202C, 202D, 202E, 202F, 202G, 203A, 203B, 203C, 203D, 203E, 203F, 203G, 204A, 204B, 205C, 207A, 207C, 208, 209, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315; of tract 136 block(s) 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107C, 108, 109, 110, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121A, 121B, 122A, 122B, 122C, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127A, 127B, 127C, 128, 129, 199, 201A, 201B, 201C, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216A, 216B, 216C, 299, 301A, 301B, 301C, 301D, 302, 303, 304, 305A, 305B, 306A, 306B, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322A, 322B, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 499; of tract 148.98 block(s) 101, 102A, 102B, 103, 104A, 104B, 104C, 104D, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 119, 122A, 122B, 122C, 123, 124, 126A, 126B, 192, 193, 197, 199A, 201, 203A, 203B, 203C, 204A, 204C, 204D, 205, 206, 207A, 207B, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290A, 290B, 291, 299A, 299B, 299C, 299D, 301A, 301B, 302B, 305, 307, 311A, 311B, 312A, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336A, 336C, 338, 351, 352A, 354A, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 399A, 399B, 402A, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 412, 413A, 414A, 415. (3) District 19 is composed of (a) That part of Pasco County made up of tract(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 311, 314, 315; of tract 309 block(s) 207A, 207B, 207C, 207D, 207E, 207F, 207G, 207H, 208, 209A, 209B, 209C, 210, 211A, 211B, 212A, 212B, 212C, 87 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 212D, 212E, 212F, 212G, 212H, 213, 214A, 214B, 215A, 215B, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 226, 227, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 280, 281A, 281B, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290A, 290B, 291, 292A, 292B, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 401, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653A, 653B, 654, 655A, 655B, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 699; of tract 312.01 block(s) 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 210, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432; of tract 317.02 block(s) 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 149, 150, 151, 152. (b) That part of Pinellas County made up of tract(s) 262, 267.01, 267.02, 268.04, 268.05, 268.07, 268.08, 268.10, 268.11, 268.12, 268.13, 269.03, 269.04, 269.05, 269.06, 269.07, 270, 271.01, 271.02, 271.03, 272.01, 272.02, 272.04, 272.05, 272.06, 272.07, 272.08, 273.01, 273.05, 273.06, 273.07, 273.08, 273.09, 273.10, 274.01, 274.02, 274.03, 275.01, 275.02; of tract 253.03 biock(s) 108C, 111, 112, 116A, 116B, 117, 131, 132, 133, 134, 143, 144, 145A, 145B, 146, 147, 199E; of tract 253.05 block(s) 101A, 117; of tract 254.06 block(s) 165, 166B, 166C, 172A, 172B, 173A, 175, 179; of tract 255.04 block(s) 101A, 101B, 101C, 102A, 102B, 102C, 102D, 102E, 122A, 122B, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 199; of tract 256.01 block(s) 128, 201, 202, 212, 401, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 430; of tract 256.02 block(s) 101, 102A, 102B, 103A, 103B, 103C, 104, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 1 29, 130, 131, 132, 133, 303, 304, 306, 307, 326; of tract 258 block(s) 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 301, 303, 305, 318, 399; of tract 259.01 block(s) 224; of tract 259.02 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 128, 129, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 301, 314, 601, 602, 603, 604; of tract 261 block(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 399, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 499, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623; of tract 263 block(s) 313, 314, 401, 402, 403, 404A, 404B, 404C, 404D, 404E, 405, 406A, 406B, 407A, 407B, 407C, 407D, 407E, 407F, 408A, 408B, 408C, 408D, 408E, 408F, 409, 410, 411, 412A, 412B, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418A, 418B, 418C, 418D, 418E, 419, 420, 421, 422A, 422B, 422C, 422D, 423, 424, 425A, 425B, 425C, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 499A, 499B, 502, 503, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716; of tract 265 block(s) 201B, 201D; of tract 266.02 block(s) 101A, 101B, 102, 103, 104, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 199, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 301, 302, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407. TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE (4) District 21 is composed of: (a) That part of Hillsborough County made up of tract(s) 1, 2, 3, 7, 8,9, 10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 53.99, 104.02, 105, 108.06, 108.08, 120.01, 135.01, 138.99; of tract 6 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 109, 111, 112, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 141; of tract 12 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 120, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 311, 312, 314, 405, 406, 412, 413, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424; of tract 13 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104; of tract 26 block(s) 409, 410, 411, 412, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 901, 902, 903, 904; of tract 46 block(s) 101, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 126, 127, 128, 129, 201, 202, 203, 204, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 410, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 429, 430, 431, 432, 501, 504, 505, 506, 507, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536; of tract 47 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 308, 310; of tract 48 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 107, 198, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 26, 207, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 218, 219, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 906, 307, 309, 310, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 605, 606, 607, 508, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 617, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 731, 732, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817, 818, 819, 820, 821, 822, 823; of tract 49 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 608, 609, 610, 611, 613, 614, 705, 706, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812; of tract SO block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 113, 114, 125, 126, 199A, 199B, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 220, 231, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 701, 702, 703, 704, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714; of tract 51 block(s) 101, 102, 104, 106, 107, 109, 110, 117, 118; of wact 53 block(s) 101, 104, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 215, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318A, 319, 320, 321, 322, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 499, 501, 502, 503A, 504, 505, 506, 507, 599, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 699; of tract 55 block(s) 508, 511, 605, 606, 607, 625, 626, 627; of tract 57 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 107, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 201, 202, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219; of tract 60 block(s) 105; of tract 102.01 block(s) 306, 307, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 354, 355, 356; of tract 102.03 block(s) 903, 904, 905, 906, 908, 909, 910, 911; of tract 103.01 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 199, 207, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 399A, 399B; of tract 103.02 block(s) 402, 405, 406, 407, 409, 410; of tract 106 block(s) 601, 615, 617, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 627, 628; of tract 107 block(s) 801, 802, 803, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836, 838, 839, 840, 930. 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 954; of tract 108.05 block(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311A, 311B, 312A, 312B, 313A, 313B; of tract 108.07 block(s) 110, 112, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 399, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416; of tract 119.03 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110A, 110B, 111, 112, 113, 114A, 114B, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 142, 146, 602A, 602C, 614A, 614B, 703, 704A, 704B, 705, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711A, 711B, 727, 728, 729, 731, 732, 799; of tract 120.02 block(s) 199B, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 299, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 599, 601, 602, 603A, 603B, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 613, 614, 615, 616, 620, 622A, 622B, 699A, 699B, 701A, 701B, 702, 703, 704, 705A, 705B, 706A, 706B, 707A, 707B, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 810A, 810B, 811, 812, 901, 902, 903A, 903B, 903C, 904, 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 999A, 999B, 999C; of tract 121.03 block(s) 104, 199A, 305, 306, 307, 308, 399A, 627, 628, 699A; of tract 122.01 block(s) 999A, 999B; of tract 135.02 block(s) 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 133, 134, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 224, 225, 302, 305, 306, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 333, 334, 335, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 499A, 499B, 499C, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532; of tract 136 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 901, 902, 903, 904, 905, ETS 227 906, 90 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 911, 913, 914A, 914B, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 921, 922, 923, 924, 925, 926, 927, 928, 929, 930, 931, 932, 933, 934, 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 947, 948, 949, 950, 951, 952, 953, 955, 957, 958, 959, 999B, 999C, 999D, 999E, 999F, 999G; of tract 137 block(s) 101, 103, 104, 105, 107, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 123, 124, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 701, 702, 703, 705, 706, 801, 802; of tract 138 dlock(s) 104, 107, 108, 146, 148, 199A, 199B, 199D, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 710, 711, 712, 713, 717, 718A, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 725, 726, 727, 728, 729, 730, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, , 142, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 761, 762, 799A, 799B; of tract 141.01 block(s) 201, 202, 203, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 299A, 299B, 299C, 299D, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 499A, 499B, 499C; of tract 141.03 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 199, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 226, 233, 244, 299, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 715, 716, 717, 718, 719, 720, 721, 722, 723, 724, 799; of tract 141.04 block(s) 201, 202, 307, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 499. (b) That part of Manatee County made up of tract(s) 1.02, 7.01, 16; of tract 1.01 block(s) 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429; of tract 1.04 block(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 501, 518, 519; of tract 2 block(s) 231; of tract 3.03 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134A, 134B, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 199, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 416, 417, 418; of tract 7.02 block(s) 209B, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 501A, 501B, SOIC, 501D, SOIE, SOIF, 501G, 501H, 501J, 501K, SOIL, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 601A, 601B, 602A, 602B, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615A, 615B, 615C, 615D, 615E, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625A, 91 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 625B, 626A, 626B, 627A, 627B, 628A, 628B, 629, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 699A, 699B, 699C, 699D, 699E, 699F, 699G, 699H, 699], 699K, 699L, 699M, 699N, 699P, 699R, 699T; of tract 8.03 block(s) 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, +44; of tract 8.05 block(s) 101A, 101B, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 1u8, 109, 110A, 110B, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118A, 118B, 119, 120; of tract 9 block(s) 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 507, 508, 509, 510, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521; of tract 14.01 block(s) 609, 610, of tract 15.01 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331; of tract 15.02 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115A, 115B, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 201, 202, 203, 401A, 401B, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406A, 406B, 406C, 406D, 407A, 407B, 408A, 408B, 408C, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414A, 414B, 415A, 415B, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440A, 440B, 440C, 440D, 441A, 441B, 442A, 442B, 442C, 442D, 442E, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462,499. (c) That part of Pinellas County made up of tract(s) 201.01, 202.01, 202.04, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209.95, 210.95, 212, 216.95, 220; of tract 202.02 block(s) 202, 203, 204, 212, 213, 214, 217, 218, 219, 220, 224, 225, 226; of tract 202.05 block(s) 101, 105, 106, 107, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 199, 201, 209, 210, 211, 212, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 316, 317, 318, 320, 321, 324, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423; of tract 203.01 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 220, 301, 306, 310, 312, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420; of 310, 312, 313, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 338, 399A; of tract 213 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324; of tract 214 block(s) 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 235, 237; of tract 218.95 block(s) 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 418, 419, 420, 501, 502, 503, 504, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 92 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714, 801, 802, 803, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811, 812, 813, 814, 815, 816, 817; of tract 219.95 block(s) 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710; of tract 221 block(s) 311, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 328, 329, 330, 429, 430, 527; of tract 222 block(s) 139, 305 306, 307, 312, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433; of tract 234 block(s) 316, 317. (5) District 22 is composed of: (a) That part of Pinellas County made up of tract(s) 201.03, 201.04, 201.05, 223.01, 223.02, 224.01, 224.02, 245.03, 245.04, 250.06, 250.09, 251.06, 251.07, 251.08, 251.09, 251.10, 251.11, 251.12, 251.13, 251.14, 251.15, 251.16, 251.17, 251.18, 251.19, 252.03, 252.04, 252.05, 252.06, 252.07, 253.01, 253.04, 253.06, 254.01, 254.04, 254.05, 254.07, 254.08, 254.09, 255.01, 255.03, 257, 260.01, 260.02, 260.99, 264, 266.01, 267.03, 268.09, 276.01, 276.02, 277.01, 277.02, 278, 279.01, 279.02, 280.01, 280.02, 281.01, 281.02, 282, 283, 284.01, 284.02, 285; of tract 222 block(s) 108, 109, 110, 119, 120, 129, 130, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236; of tract 225.01 block(s) 122, 124, 125, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 217, 218, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 399, of tract 225.02 block(s) 119, 212, 411, 412, 413; of tract 225.03 block(s) 302; of tract 226.01 block(s) 124, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331; of tract 250.01 block(s) 239, 269, 270, 302, 304, 332, 334, 335, 337, 338, 339, 362, 399A, 399B, 399C; of tract 250.03 block(s) 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 199A; of tract 250.07 block(s) 101, 102, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 199D, 201, 202, 203, 211, 212; of tract 250.08 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 199, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 399, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 499; of tract 253.03 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108A, 108B, 109, 110, 113, 114, 115, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 135, 136, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137D, 138A, 138B, 139A, 139B, 140, 141A, 141B, 141C, 142, 148, 149, 150, 151, 199A, 199B, 199C, 199D, 199F; of tract 253.05 block(s) 101B, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110A, 110B, 110C, 110D, 110E, 111, 112, 113, 93 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135A, 135B, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 199; of tract 254.06 block(s) 101A, 101B, 101C, 101D, 101E, 102, 103A, 103B, 104, 105A, 105B, 106A, 106B, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130A, 130B, 131A, 131B, 131C, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136A, 136B, 136C, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143A, 143B, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158A, 158B, 158C, 158D, 158E, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 166A, 106D, 167, 168A, 168B, 169, 170, 171, 173B, 173C, 173D, 174A, 174B, 176, 177, 178, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 199; of tract 255.04 block(s) 103A, 103B, 103C, 103D, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110A, 110B, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119A, 119B, 120, 121, 128A, 128B, 128C, 129A, 129B, 129C, 129D, 130A, 130B, 130C, 201A, 201B, 202A, 202B, 203A, 203B, 204, 205A, 205B, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212A, 212B, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220A, 220B, 221, 222, 301A, 301B, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 326, 32% 329, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 499; of tract 256.01 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132, 199, 203, 204, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 429, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 444, 445, 448, 449, 450, 451; of tract 256.02 block(s) 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213A, 213B, 214. 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 301, 302, 305, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 399, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409; of tract 258 block(s) 101, 102, 103A, 103B, 104, 105A, 105B, 105C, 106A, 106B, 107A, 107B, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116A, 116B, 117A, 117B, 118A, 118B, 118C, 119A, 119B, 120A, 120B, 120C, 121A, 121B, 121C, 199, 302, 304, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338; of tract 259.01 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 199, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 225, 226, 227, 228; of tract 259.02 block(s) 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 315, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 499, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, §21, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546; of tract 261 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 94 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 199, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 299, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 599A, 599B, 599C; of tract 263 block(s) 101A, 101B, 101C, 101D, 101E, 102, 103, 104, 110, 111, 112A, 112B, 112C, 112D, 1126. 112F, 112G, 113A, 113B, 113C, 113D, 113E, 113F, 113G, 114, 115, 123A, 123B, 124, 125, 126, 127A, 127B, 128A, 128B, 129, 130A, 130B, 131, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208A, 208B, 208C, 209, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307A, 307B, 308, 309, 310A, 310B, 310C, 311A, 311B, 311C, 311D, 311E, 312A, 312B, 312C, 312D, 312E, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 501, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515; of tract 265 block(s) 101A, 101B, 102, 128, 133, 135, 201A, 201C, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209A, 209B, 209C, 210A, 210B, 210C, 210D, 211, 212, 213A, 213B, 214A, 214B, 214C, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223A, 223B, 224A, 224B, 225A, 225B, 225C, 226, 227, 228, 229A, 229B, 230A, 230B, 230C, 231A, 231B, 231C, 231D, 232A, 232B, 232C, 233, 234, 235A, 235B, 236, 237A, 237B, 237C, 238, 239A, 239B, 240A, 240B, 240C, 241, 242, 243, 299, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 399, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 499, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 601A, 601B, 601C, 602A, 602B, 603, 604, 605, 606A, 606B, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613A, 613B, 614A, 614B, 615, 616A, 616B, 617A, 617B, 617C, 617D, 618, 619A, 619B, 620, 621A, 621B, 622A, 622B, 699A, 699B, 699C, 699D; of tract 266.02 block(s) 303. 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425. (6) District 2? is composed of: (a) That part of Hillsborough County made up of tract(s) 101.02, 101.03, 101.04, 102.04, 104.01, 108.03, 108.04, 109, 121.04, 121.05, 121.06, 122.03, 122.04, 123.01, 123.02, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132.01, 132.02, 133.01, 133.02, 133.04, 133.05, 134.01, 134.02, 134.03, 139.02, 139.03, 139.04, 139.05, 140.01, 140.02, 140.03, 142.98; of tract 102.01 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324A, 324B, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 353, 357, 399A, 399B, 399C, 399D, 399F, 399G, 399H, 399], 399K, 399L, 399M, 399N, 399P, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 410B, 410C, 414C, 415A, 415B, 415C, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422A, 422B, 422C, 423, 424B, 424C, 425C, 426B, 427B, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 499B, 499C, 499D, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 599; of tract 102.03 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 199A, 199B, 901, 902, 907; of tract 103.01 block(s) 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 95 TAB 14: BILL LANGUAGE FOR PLAN 386, FLORIDA SENATE 209, 210: of tract 103.02 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, a 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, — — 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, - * 401, 403, 404, 408, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, $11, 51 a tract 106 block(s) 101, 102, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 125, a: a 128, 201, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 224, 225, 226, 227, a —y — 302, 315, 317, 318, 319, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 515, 516, 517, -- oo $20, 521, 522, 523; of tract 107 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, an — 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 131, 133, 134, 136, 137, 138, 201, 202, 203, 204, my — 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 330, — — 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, on — 502, 503, 504, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 535, 536, 538, 539, 540, 541, $42, 543, — 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 637, 638, — 640, 641, 642, 643, 644, 645, 646, 730, 731, 732, 733, 734, 735, 736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750; of tract ye ae 113A. 113B, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118B, 119, 199A, 199B, 224B, 225, 5 a ~ 515: of tract 120.02 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, on a 112, 113, 114, 199A, 199C; of tract 121.03 block(s) 101, 102, 103, 199B, —~ — 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 301, — 303, 304, 399B, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, $01, 502, 503, “ 505, 506, 507, 601, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, ena 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 699B; po ~ block(s) 101, 102, 199, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, — — 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, — 230, 231, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 399, 401, 402, 403, 208, 08, £XKs 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, — 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 601, 602, a 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, pe 905, 906, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 919, 920, 999C: of tract 135.02 block(s) 101, 102, 117; of tract 136 block( [Text truncated at 120,000 characters. The full text is on the page linked above.] --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385013_0774%3A07. Public record. Not legal advice.