# Amicus Curiae Brief — School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. Arline

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385012_0067%3A17

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Amicus Curiae Brief
- **Published:** January 1, 1987
- **Citation:** 480 U.S. 273

## Text

g Supreme Court, U.S, x
FILED

SEP 19 1986

JOSEPH F. SPANIOL, JR,

IN THE
Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1985

SCHOOL BOARD Ol!
FLORIDA, et al..

BRIEF AMICI CLURLAE OF DOCTORS FOR AIDS RESEARCH AND

EDUCATION: NEIL SCHRANI, M.D., MERVYN SILVERMAN, \VI.D.,
\ 17
rl

‘ } ,

GERALD FRIEDLAND, M.D., DONALD ABRAMIS,
DANIEL WILLIAM, M.D., HAROLD HAWLEY, M.D
ALEXANDRA LEVINE, M.D., DAVID OSTROW, M.D
tinued within)

OF RESPOS

LEISHNIAN
And

DAY LDSé mN _at I ite for I Disabled
VIcGREIV"
HOFFMAN

~

JOSEPH LAVV!I

|,
Law Center!

ADDITIONAI

DENNIS McSHANE,
PETER HESELTINE,
JOEL WEISMAN,
JAMES LIPSETT,
STUART
ROGER

CONSTANCE WOFSY,
NICK IFFT, M.D.,
MICHAEL ROTH, M

MICHAEL
ALLEN

NICHOLAOS BELLOS,
M.D
FREEMAN, M.A.,

M.D..,

PETER WOLFE,
HAL
THOMAS MUNDY,

AMIC

]
A

M.D..

M.D

D.O..
M.D..,
NICHOLS, M.D..,
DETELS, M.D..,

M

bios

KAISER, M.D.,
McCUTCHAN, M.D.,

M

,

L)

1)
s

WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER

NORBERT
MARSHALL

GILMORE,
FORSTEIN,

M

DAVID McEWAN, M.D

A.
AMY ROSS, Ph.D..,
ROBERT BOLAN, M

BRAD TRUAX, M.D.,

LD

BRIAN WILLOUGHBY, Nh

JAMES CHERRY,
KENT SACK,

M

and

T)

M.D

D.,

M.D..,

1.]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTEREST OF AMICI
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
ARGUMENT

I. A REVIEW OF THE
MEDICAL AUTHORITIE
DEMONSTRATES THAT
PERSONS INFECTED
WITH THE AIDS VIRUS
ARE HANDICAPPED
INDIVIDUALS

A. What Is

The AIDS Virus
Not Casually

THE

ESTABLISH THAT
PERSONS INFECTED
WITH THE AIDS

ARE PROTECTED UNDER

Persons Infected

With The AIDS Virus

Are Handicapped

Within The

Meaning Of The

Statute. ccceccces 41

Persons Infected

With The AIDS

Virus Are Not,

Solely By Virtue

Of Their Infection,
Automatically

Rendered Not

Otherwise

Qualified For

Any JOD... eeeees 59

CO
©
,
‘@
[ |
C

Ww
=,
=

J

N)

APPENDIX

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

CASES Page(s)

Arline v. School Bd. of
Nassau County,
772 F.2d 759 (llth
Gee 6 Bens 6666 06we-oee} eae 42
34 CFR § 104 (1985)...... 42
45 CFR § 84.3(3)(2)(1)(A)-(11)

i Ree 6666666066806 866 43,44

45 C.F.R. Pt. 84, App. A..

Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
§ 504, 29 U.S.C.A.
BR, Bi rae

Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
29 U.S.C.A. §$ 706(7)
fo: ae ee

Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
29 U.S.C.A. §$ 706(13)

a.) ee ee
Social Security Act, 42

U.S.C.A. § 423(d)

[eee csestheceseteuoe

MEDICAL AUTHORITIES

Apparent Transmission of Human
T-Lymphotropic Virus
Type III/Lymphadenopathy-
Associated Virus From a

Child to a Mother Providing

Health Care, 35 MMWR 76
[as Bet 66666eceence

Bakeman, et al., AIDS
Risk-Group Profiles in
Whites and Members of
Minority Groups, 315 New
Eng. J. Med. 191 (July

Page(s)
43,57

passim

Blattner, et al., Epidemiology
of Human T-Lymphotropic
Virus Type I. and the Risk
of Acquired Imauno-
deficiency Syndrome,
103 Annals Internal Med.
665 (Nov. 1985)......-.. 18

Brettman, Serologic and
Epidemiologic Assessment of
AIDS Risk, 3 Infections in
Med. 18 (Jan. 1986).... 15,17

Carlson, et al., AIDS Serology
Testing in Low- and
High-Risk Groups, 253 J.
A.M.A. 3405 (June
a errrrrr TT Tere Te 18

Case for Concluding Heat
Treated Licensed
Anti-Hemophiliac Factor Is
Free From HTLV-III, Lancet
890 (Oct. 19, 1985).... 29

CDC, Classification System for
Human T-Lymphotropic Virus
Type III/Lymphadenopathy-
Associated Virus Infection,
105 Annals Internal Med.

234 (Aug. 1986)........ 13,15
CDC, Weekly Surveillance

Report - United States

AIDS Program, July 29,

DR cee ce eeseeoeseoeess tf. Fe

CDC, 1985 STD Treatment Guidelines,
34 MMWR (Supp.) 75S (Oct.
BU) 66s 6b oseeeeeoesees 29

Page(s)

Coffin, et al., Human
Immunodeficiency Viruses,
232 Sci. 697 (May
BOOP cevecenetestuseoes 10

Cohen et al., Congestive
Cardiomyopathy in
Association with the
Acquired Immuno-
deficiency Syndrome,
315 New Eng. J. Med. 628
SS. SPO l oe cecécecce 16

Condoms Prevent Transmission
of AIDS-Associated
Retrovirus, 255 J. A.M.A.
1706 (Apr. 1986)....... 29

=

ck, et al.
roepidemiological Studies
HTLV-III Antibody
evalence Among Selected
oups of Heterosexual
ricans, 254 J. A.M.A.

25a (MOV. 1LFSS) eo ceseces

IW

O
mrss irhiDd ©

» 10/0

Daul, et al., Acquired Immnune
ency Syndrome: An
e and Interpretation,
ls Allergy 351

A
(Sept. 1983)........0..

Davis, Histopathological
Changes in the Thymus
Gland, 12 Annais N.Y. Acad.
Sciences 493 (1986).... 24

Dlugosch, et al., AIDS
Antibody Testing:
Evaluation and
Counseling, 1 Focus: Rev.
of AIDS Res. 1 (July
De non nbeeneeesesensn 47

Drotman, Insect-Borne
Transmission of AIDS?, 254
J. A.M.A. 1085 (Aug.
RUS 0 0650666666646 688 23

Education and Foster Care of
Children Infected With
Human T-Lymphotropic Virus
Type I1I/Lymphadenopathy-
Associated Virus, 34 MMWR
517 (Aug. 1985).....26.

Evatt, Coincidental Appearance
of HTLV-III/LAV Antibodies
in Hemophiliacs and the
Onset of the AIDS Epidemic,
31 New Eng. J. Med. 483
POR. AFSOlcccecececees 21

Female-to-Male Transmission of
HTLV-III, 255 J. A.M.A. 1702

Fettner & W. Check, The
Truth About AIDS
(1984)

*eeseeenee#ee#eeseeee##ee#e##*# # # #

Page(s)

Freidland, et al., Lack of
Transmission of
HTLV-III/LAV Infection to
Household Contacts of
Patients With AIDS or
AIDS-Related Complex with
Oral Candidiasis, 314 New
Eng. J. Med. 344, (Feb.

Friedman et al.,
Cytomegalovirus Retinitis:
a Manifestation of the
Acquired Immune Deficiency
Syndrome (AIDS), 67 Brit.
J. Opthamology 372 (June
4 eee eee l6

Gallo, et al., Frequent
Detection and Isolation
of Cytopathic Retroviruses
(HTLV-III) from Patiencs
With AIDS and At Risk For
AIDS, 224 Sci. 500
| eee eee 19

V-III Transmiss Lon ’

LV-
254 J. A.M.A. 2130 (Oct.

Health & and Pub. Policy
Comm'n, Amer. C. Physicians,
& the Infectious Diseases
soc’'y Amer., Position
Paper: Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome, 104
Annuals Internal Med. 575
(Ae. SISO cccecesesces

Henderson, et al., Risk of
Nasocomial Infection
With Human T-Cell
Lymphotrophic Virus
Type III/Lymphadempothy-
Associated Virus in Large
Cohort of Intensively
Exposed Health Care Workers,
1104 Annals Internal Med.
644 (May 1986)......... 35

HTLV-III Exposure During
Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation, 313 New
Eng. J. Med. 1606 (Dec.

Infrequency of Isolation of
HTLV-III Virus From Saliva
In AIDS, 313 New Eng.
Med. 1606 (Dec.
1985)

i

Sea eoeeessece@ee@eesetereectees?s F

Kalish & Schlossman, The
T4 Lymphocyte in AIDS
313 New Eng. J. Med.
112 (July 1985)

je@#e#eeeeese# # @

Korcok, AIDS Hysteria: A
Contagious Side Effect,
133 Can. Med. A.J. 1241
(Dec. 1985) 5 2

Krelss, et al., Antibody tO
Human T-Lymphotropic Virus
Type III in Wives of
Hemophiliacs, 102 Annals
Internal Med. 623 (May
1985)

Page(s)

Lange, et al., HTLV-III/LAV
Infection in Nine Children
Infected by a Single Plasma
Donor, 154 J. Infectious
Diseases 171 (July
S| Pee TTT TT TTT eT eee 19

, 6 Discovery
985)... oe eeeeeae 1Q,21,26

Langone, AIDS
28 (Dec. 1

Levine, The Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome

In Persons With Hemophilia,

103 Annals Internal Med.

723 (Mov. 1965)... ccceccs

Lymon, et al., Minimal Risk
Transmission of
AIDS-Associated Retrovirus
Infection by Oral-Genital

. ie

Contact, 255 J. A.M.A. 03

[as Bev bs 6460080008 28
Mandell, et al., Principles

and Practices of Infectious

Diseases (2d ed. 1984).

Mann, et al., Prevalence of
HTLV-III/LAV_ in Household
Contacts of Patients With

Confirmed AIDS and Controls

in Kinshasa, Zaire, 256 J.
A.M.A. 721 (Aug. 1986). 26

Melbye, et al., Long-Term
Seropositivity For Human
T-Lymphotropic Virus Type
III in Homosexual Men
Without the Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome:
Development of Immunologic
and Clinical Abnormalities,
104 Annals Internal Med.

496 (Apr. 1986)........ 21

Melbye, et al., Anal
Intercourse As A Possible
Factor in Heterosexual
Transmission of HTLV-III ¢t
Spouses of Hemophiliacs,
312 New Eng. J. Med. 85/7
[JOR BFS) cc cceceéesses 25,36

Moss et al., Progression to
AIDS in Men Seropositive
for LAV/HTLV-III: One-year
Followups of San Francisco
General Hospital Study,
Proc. of the Second Int'l
Conf. On AIDS 152 (Paris)
(JUNG LISS). cccccesccses 30,46

Navia, et al., The AIDS
Dementia Complex: I
Clinical Features and
Il, Neuropathology,

19 Annals Neurology 51/7 &
525 (Apr. L9G) .ccccces

*e eeeeeee##e#*e*

Paterat, et al.

T

laa

serological Markers
as ,Indicators of
Sexual Orientation
in AIDS Virus-
Infected Men, 256
J. A.M.A. 712 (Aug.

erman, et al., Epidemiol:
of the Acquired
Immunodef i l1ency Syndro me

(AIDS), 7 Epidemiological
Rev. 1 (1985

+

vention of Acquired Immu:
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS
Report of Inter-Agency
Recommendations 32 MMWR
See SEE s BOS lcccecece
visional Public Healt
Service Inte yency

r
screening Donated Blood
and Plasma f 1]

to the Virus Causing
Acquired Immunodef 1¢ c
Syndro e, $4 MMWR

dl Pervpeeeoeoeeaneeees

Page(s)

Recommendations for Assisting
in the Prevention of
Perinatal Transmission of
Human T Lymphotropic Virus
Type III/Lymphadenopathy
Associated Virus and
Acquired Immunodeficiency
Syndrome, 34 MMWR 721
ts MP cseecoceeeces 24,32,48

Recommendations for Preventing
Transmission of Infection
with Human T-Lymphotrophic
Virus Type III/
Lymphadenopathy~-Associated
Virus During Invasive
Procedures, 35 MMWR 221
CRs BOPOP cece qesccece 22,3

Recommendations for Preventing
Transmission of Infections
with Human T-Lymphotropic
Virus Type III/
Lymphadenopathy-Associated
Virus In The Workplace, 34
MMWR 681 (Nov. 1985)...

Recommendations for Providing
Dielysis Treatment to
Patients Infected With
Human T-Lymphotrophic Virus
Type III/Lymphadenopathy
Associated Virus, 35 MMWR

376 (June 1986)........

Page(s)

Redfield, et al., Frequent
Bidirectional Heterosexual
Transmission of HTLV-III/

LAV Between Spouses,

Proc. of the Second

Int'l Conf. on AIDS 125

(Paris) (June 1986).... 25,27

Redfield, et al., Frequent
Transmission of HTLV-III
Among Spouses of Patients
With AIDS-Related Complex
and AIDS, 253 J. A.M.A.
1571 (Mar. 1985)....... 26

Revision of the Case
Definition of Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome
for National Reporting --
United States, 34 MMWR 373
[oun Sees atadeeuceer 12,15

Sande, The case against Casual
Contagion, 14 New Enq.

Med. 380 | pods, 1986)... 6,27,28,

scott, et al., Mothers of
Infants with the Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Evidence for Both

Symptomatic and

Asymptomatic Carriers, 253
J. A.M.A. 363 (June
BOOM eee cceeeéeeeeenécs Gre

Self-Reported Behavioral]
Changes Among Homosexua]
Men -- San Francisco, 34
MMWR 6]3 (Oct. 1985)...

XxVi

° — EEE — ——_

Tsoukas, et al., Risk of
Transmission of
HTLV-III/LAV From
Human Bites, Proc. of
the Second Int'l Conf.
on AIDS 125 (Paris)
(Fume ADSSPccccceceosss 35

Update: Acquired
Immunodeficiency
Syndrome-United States, 35
MMWR 17 (Jan. 1986).... 19,34

Update: Evaluation of Human
T-Lymphotropic Virus Type
[l1I1/Lymphadenopathy
Associated Virus Infection
in Health Care Personnel -
United States, 34 MMWR 575
(Sept. 1985)......eee--, 3 4

Update: Prospective
Evaluation of Health-Care
Workers Exposed Via The
Parenteral or Mucous-
Membrane Route To Blood
Or Body Fluids From
Patients With Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome -
United States, 34 MMWR 101
(PeD. L9ESPecccccsceess 34

Welliseh, U.C.L.A. Psychological
Study of AIDS, 19 Frontiers
of Radiation Therapy &
Oncology 155 (1985).... 6 3

Page(s)

OTHER AUTHORITIES

AIDS Fear Forced Pupils Out,
N.Y. Times, Oct. 4, 1985,
OS Debs CGibe Gace dbs evs 5

AMA Management Briefs,
AIDS: The Workplace
ageues, S&F CAFS) oscces

CCH, AIDS: Employer Rights
and Responsibilities 29
¢).. ) eee 49

»

Cimons, 11 Immigrants Face
AIDS Test, L.A. Times, §
at 1, col. 3 (Feb. 4,

POO oeecceees eocescces
Civ. Rts. Comm'n, Accommodating
the Spectrum of Abilities

Co
—_
\O
© ©)
LA)
>

*eeeeeesekse#ee#e#e#e#«

Dershowitz, Crucial Steps
in Combating the AIDS
Epidemic; Emphasize
Scientific Information,
N.Y. Times, Mar. 18, 1986,
CS Betis Gee Sibcacteoeoes

(Letter), N. Tim P
Apr 186, at 14,

Page\s)

Eckholm, Screening of Blood
for AIDS Raises Civil
Liberties Issues, N.Y.
Times, Sept. 30, 1985,
AL, GOEc Beecccoceseses 48

Floum, The Federal Rights
of Hanson's Disease
(Leprosy) Patients
at Kalaupapa, 6 U.
Haw. L. Rev. 507
S). . | Se ereyverrrrrrre 56

Gay Women and Risk of AIDS

L.A. Times, Apr. 2, 1986,
Ot VE, GObe Besesceesens

Hemophilia Info. Exchange,
AIDS, HTLV-III and
Hemophilia: Your Questions
Answered, AIDS Update 4
(Apr. 1966) ..cccccccces 14

Hemophilia Info. Exchange,
Hemophilia and Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndrome
(AIDS): Intimacy and
Sexual Behavior, AIDS
Update 1 (Sept.

LPR OP ccc eesesseceosesess

Jaret, The Wars Within, 169
Nat'l Geographic 70 & Be. &, GCOS. 3 (CC
Rw) o66e 04406 060% 19

7
a

Page(s)

Kristof, More Insurers Screen

Applicants for AIDS, N.Y.

Times, at Dl, col. 1 (Dec.

26, 4) eee eee -}.'
Lieberson, The Reality of

AIDS, N.Y. Rev. 43

les BGs REE ooesecee 5,12
Local Health Officers Meet in

Washington to Make

Recommendations to Mayors,

3 AIDS Info. Exchange 1

tS Perret re Te 39
McKeever, The Number One Issue,

Aids Update Newsletter 1]

LAE. LISS ccvcecesveces
Medical Experts Assail

Initiative on AIDS:

Officials Dismiss Claims

Made by Supporters of

LaRouche-Backed Prop. 64,

L.A. Times, Aug. 3, 1986,

rf 2 — ese Aveo f

Note, AIDS and Employment
Discrimination under the
Federal Rehabilitation Act
of 19%3—and Virginia's
Rights of Persons with
Disabilities Act, 20 U.
Richmond L. Rev. 425

,aas
(LISS) wccccccccccccceccs
CR Region IV Letter Ruling
. ] sr / (VA ba /
Complaint No, )4 +4 5 Io
. m 1} QR
(AUG. 9, LIGGJecccccceccs

OCR Region IX, Your Rights as
a Person with AIDS or ARC
(undated release).....-

Public Health Service Plan
for the Prevention and
Control of the AIDS
Virus: Report of the
Coolfant Conference,
(June 4-6, 1986)
reprinted in principal

art in Health

ep. 341

PD. ec eeedsseeeeeseos 11,19,26,

-
— €
Cy ee
'U
_-
-

4 @)

Dp:
R
]

Shipp, Physical Suttering 15
Not the Only Pain AIDS Ca
inflict, N.Y. Times at AS,
91. 1 (Fer ), 1986)

Smith, et al., High Court Eyed
for Guidance on AIDS as
Handicap, Legal Times 35
(June 30, 1986).......-.

le United States Gove
Manual 1985-86 2/7¢f
(1985)... cece peeeeeess
Crew Leaves set r A >
: tims Interview, N
es Mar 28 Y

U.S. Civ. Rights Comn.,
Accommodating the Spectrum

of Abilities (1983).... 42

-S. Dep't of Justice Office of
Legal Counsel, Memorandum
Re: Application of Section
204 of the Rehabilitation
Act to Persons with AIDS,
AIDS-Related Complex or
AIDS Virus (June 23,
Peer bebe seedeseeeeneer passin

-S. Off. Tech. Assessment,
Review of the Public Health
Service's Response to AIDS:
A_ Technical Memorandum
ee. ) ere

Researcher, N.Y. Times,
July 23, 1986, at D20,
o~ )

U.S. Apologizes to AIDS

BRIEF OF DOCTORS FOR AIDS RESEARCH
AND EDUCATION, AS AMICI CURIAE

INTEREST OF AMICI CURDAE
This brief amici

mitted in support f Re
behalf of Doctors for AIDS Research and
Education (DARE). DARE 1S >omposed of
physicians and public health specialists
who are experts on the disease commonly
Known aS Acquired _ Immune Deficiency

Syndrome (AIDS).

Through this brief, An provide
the Court with accurate and p-to-date
medical facts regarding AIDS order t

rrect the nisinformatio and dist
t — / Wi fe [ ed DY 4 r s@ [ — i. I cv i Aw 4 y
i ed nerein DY otners ‘nese acts
ecome } al only if tne Court ‘ ses
t > 1e a lsSsS e t Del ce tne
The qualifications of the Jivid
als who constitute DARE are set f tt
the Appendix to this brief

applicability of Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. § 794, et seg., (the "Act") to
individuals infected with the AIDS
virus.

Resolution of that question should
await a case squarely presenting the

. ° — 7 , a] ‘7 ] rr) ry ] ]
issue, to allow development of a full

even pdDasic avallable medical data demon

Strate that individuals infected with

tne AIDS virus must be encompassed

within the framework of the Act. An ,
aS experts, here present these data.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
€ . pe ) f review in tne [ cac

ase iS narrow, rne yuestions tnis

Tne parties t tnis action have

nsented to the filing of this brief,

and tneir letters of nmsent are pelna

] ur °F -L hic . y
filed with the Clerk of this Court.

Court certified for consideration are
expressly limited to the "disease of

tuberculosis." School Board of Nassau

County, Florida v. Arline, 106 S. Ct.

1633, 1634 (1986). No testimony, otner

evidence or findings below dealt with,

()
ct
W

or even mentioned, A:DS. The A
focus upon individualized consideration
of the handicapped thus prohibits trans
forming this case about a woman with
tuberculosis into a vehicle for specula

tion on the varied situations of the

over one million Americans who have been

nal
mr

licted with a virus causing the very

different disease of AIDS.

Nevertneless, without adequate
f . 1, e
nrormatlol and ln tne absence of a
. “A [ + Wate -c us Lilia + Aat }
record, retitioners WOULC nave tne

Court, through a broadly based decision,

~*

pre- judge sSues bearing ipon those
' : |
infected with the AIDS virus. Am1Ci
3 Petitioners and those supporting
their petition have tried repeatedly t
(footnote ontinued on next page!

urge the Court to reject efforts to
broaden the scope of the issues pre-
sented and to limit its ruling to the
record before it.

The high mortality rates resulting
from AIDS have created anxiety in a pub

. 4
lLinformed about the disease, an

nterject questions about AIDS into this
ase. Petitioners’ Reply Brief on writ

of Certiorari discussed application of
the Act to AIDS exclusively. Peti
’

tioners Opening Brief discusses at
length the Justice Department's Office
of Legal Counsel's Memorandum Re:
Application of Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act to Persons with AIDS,
AIDS-Related Complex or AIDS _Virus
(June 23, 1986) [hereinafter DoJ Memo],
a copy of which Petitioners have lodged

with the Court. All amici supporting
Petitioners refer to the DoJ Memo in
their briefs, and the brief amicus

curiae of Congressman Dannemeyer, et al.
Speaks nore about AIDS than about tuber
‘ulosis.

4 A September 1985 CBS _ poll found
that 47% erroneously think it is possi-
ble to contract AIDS from ae shared

drinking glass, 32% believe in error
that AIDS may be contracted from

(footnote yntinued on next page)

anxiety that many of Petitioners’ amici

attempt to feed.” This hysteria and the

public's misquided exclusive association
L
of the infection with certain sexual

activities have brought political

kissing, and 28% mistakenly think AIDS
can be contracted from a toilet seat.
Lieberson, The Reality of AIDS, N.Y.
Rev. 43, 45 (Jan. 16, 1986) {hereinafter
Reality]. Such misperceptions have
resulted in television crews walking off
the set where persons with AIDS were
being interviewed, TV Crew Leaves Set of
AIDS Victims Interview, N.Y. Times,
Mar. 28, 1985, at B6, col. 3, and stu
dents being removed from classes because
of suspicions that boyfriends of their
mothers had contracted AIDS. AIDS Fear
Forced Pupils Out, N.Y. Times, Oct. 4,
1985, at Bl, col. 4; see also Korcok,
AIDS Hysteria: A Contagious Side
Effect, 133 Can. Med. A.J. 1241 (Dec.
1985).

5 See, e.q., Brief Amicus Curiae of
Cong. Dannemeyer, et al., at 18-19, nN.
/. Not even the legal system has been
immu. - from such irrational reactions.

See, e.q., Richmond News Leader, Sept.
6, 1985, at 13, col. 1 (reporting drop-
ping of charges against criminal defen-
dant with AIDS rather than having
accused enter courtroom).

: 6 —-
tensions into tne medical arena. Amici

seek to help resolve these tensions by
providing an accurate understanding of
the nature of AIDS.

Amici first describe the nature of
authoritative medica journals. rhe

Studies reported demonstrate that the

AIDS virus 1S 1ifficult t tract

Hence, the Centers for Disease Control
8

[Ss recommends that individuals who

6 See Medical Experts Assail

Initiative on AIDS: Officials Dismiss

Claims Made _ by Supporters of LaRouche-
Backed Prop. 64, L.A. Times, Aug. 3,
1986, $1, at 3, col. 2; Eu v. Male, No.
341940, slip op. (Sac., Cal. Sup. Ct.
Aug. 8, 1986) (ordering removal of "med-

ical data” -- erroneously asserting that
casual transmission of AIDS virus has
been shown to occur -- from argument in

favor of quarantine initiative in state
Dallot pamphlet).

] See, e.qg., Sande, The Case against
Casual Contagion, 314 New Eng. J. Med.
380 (Feb. 1986) [hereinafter Casual].
8 The CDC is the federal agency
tharged with protecting the nati 'S
{ + + te + rn) ed or next r je)

SN eee

have been infected with the virus be
permitted to continue to work and attend
school.”

Second, Amici demonstrate that per
sons infected with the AIDS virus are
handicapped individuals under the Act's
provisions. Those infected have physi

cal and mental impairments that substan

tially limit major life activities.
They also are regarded by thers is
nav 1 Ng SUCI npa lrments
public health by providing leadershify
and direction in the prevention and con
trol of disease. The United States
Government Manual 1985-86 276 (1985)
4 Recommendations for Preventing
Transmission of Infections with Human
T-Lymphotropic Virus Type III/
lrus In The

Lymphadenopathy-Associated Viru
Workplace, 34 Morbidity a
Weekly Report [hereinafter "MMWR"] 681]
(Nov. 1985) [hereinafter Workplace];
Education and Foster Care of Children
Infected With Human T-Lymphotropic Virus
Type III/ Lymphadenopathy-Associated
Virus, 34 MMWR 517 (Aug. 1985) [herein

after Education].

The Act does not exclude conditions

like AIDS. Instead, it requires that
each person infected with the AIDS virus
be permitted to participate in all fed-
erally funded programs, unless and until
individualized symptoms of the disease
render that person unqualified to per-

form the activity in which he or she is

ARGUMENT

A REVIEW OF THE MEDICAL AUTHORITIES
DEMONSTRATES THAT PERSONS INFECTED
WITH THE AIDS VIRUS ARE HANDICAPPED
INDIVIDUALS.

Those infected with the AIDS virus

are the subject of public ignorance and

infounded fears, just like other handi-

capped persons whom Congress sought to
protect in passing the Act. Absent
legal protection, they are subjected to

irrational discrimination and exclusions

the basis of thelr impairments, at a

cost both to themselves and society.
Understanding what AIDS is shows that
there 1s no reason to treat persons
exposed to the AIDS virus any differ-

ently from those with other handicaps. ~

Acquired Immune Deficiency Sy:

(A S ) Ss the linical mar es

a dysfunct ff the human imm é
aused by a recently discovered
LQ While Amici have felt it

to present the medical facts set
in this brief, the record in the present

case is insufficient to support a deci
sion reaching AIDS issues. i

Commonwealth of Massachusetts _ ¥.
Painten, 390 U.S. 560, 561 (1968) (dis

missing writ because record not suffi

ciently clear and specific to permit
decision of issues).

Ll Gallo, et al., Frequent Detection
and Isolation of Cytopathic Retroviruses
(HTLV-III) from Patients With AIDS and

At Risk For AIDS, 224 Sci. 500 (May
1984). The AIDS virus has received sev-
eral names: Human T-Lymphotropic Virus
Type III (HTLV-III); Lymphadenopathy

\trootnote continued on next page}

The human immune system works through a

complicated process by which certain
white blood cells are able to recognize
and destroy foreign agents that enter
the body. The AIDS virus kills’ the
immune system's T-helper celis -- the
primary warriors of the cell-mediated
immune system?“ leaving those infected

with the virus vulnerable to diseases

Associated Virus (LAV); AIDS-Associated
Retrovirus (ARV); and, most recently,
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
Compare Langone, AIDS, 6 Discovery 28,
30 (Dec. 1985) [hereinafter AIDS) and

DoJ Memo, supra note 3 (both using
former terminology) with Coffin, et al.,
Human Immunodeficiency Viruses (Letter),
232 Sci. 697 (May 1986) (proposing HIV

terminology). This brief refers to the
Virus aS Simply the "AIDS virus." Those
whose blood indicates they have been
exposed to the virus are termed

"seropositive.

12 A. Fettner & W. Check, The Truth
About AIDS 44 (1984); Jaret, The Wars
Within, 169 Nat'l Geographic 702, 723
(June 1986) (photographic essay on

immune system and AIDS virus).

(called "opportunistic" infections) that

, >

do not affect healthy people.”

To date, there 1S no vaccine
against nor cure for AIDS. Education 1s
Crucial in bringing about changes in
behavior, the only known means of pre

vention.”

13 As of July 29, 1986, the total
reported number of persons with AIDS in
the U.S. has exceeded 23,000, over half
of whom have died. CDC, Weekly
Surveillance Report - United States AIDS
Program, July 29, 1986 [hereinafter CDC
7/29/86 Rep. ].

14 U.S. Off. Tech. Assessment, Review
of the Public Health Service's Response
to AIDS: A Technical Memorandum 49

(Feb. 1985); see also Public Health
Service Plan for the Prevention and
Control of the AIDS Virus; Report of
the Coolfant Conference, June 4-6, 1986,
at 11-12 [hereinafter Coolfont Rep. |],
reprinted in principal part in 101 Pub.
Health Rep. 341 (July-Aug. 1986); Self-

Reported Behavioral hanges Among
Homosexual Men -- San Francisco, 34 MMWR
613 (Oct. 1985) {hereinafter Behavioral
Changes] (demonstrating that, as a
result of education, the percentage of
homosexual and bisexual men engaging

nly in non-promiscuous sa*e-sex prac
tices rose from 61% in April 1984 to 81%
one year later).

While fully developed AIDS is_ the

best known condition associated with the
AIDS virus, a range of symptoms may
result from infection.* Recently, man-
ifestations of the infection have been

classified pursuant to four groups of

Symptoms and several sub-classes:

15 See Revision of the Case Definition
of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
for National Reporting -- United States,

34 MMWR 373, 374 (June 1985) [hereinaf-
ter Revision of Definition]; see also
"The Case Definition of AIDS Used by CDC
for National Reporting" (Aug. 1, 1985),
Attachment A to DoJ Memo [hereinafter
CDC Definition].

16 Previously, persons with the AIDS
virus were classed as (1) having either
AIDS; (2) having AIDS-Related Complex
("ARC"), which loosely referred to the
-onjunction of such symptoms as swollen
lymph-nodes, fever, weight loss,
fatigue, and night sweats, Kalish &
Schlossman, The T4 Lymphocyte in _ AIDS,
313 New Eng. J. Med. 112 (July 1985), or
(3) being asymptomatic but testing posi-
tive. See Reality, supra note 4. See

also DoJ Memo, supra note 3, at 9 and
n.20 (using former classification sys

tem).

ct

-

s

I) early acute, though t iwsilent, sig!
. a yY T r or , ?
f the disease; (II) asymptomat1 inte
lon; (III) persistent Swoliel Lymp
— Tt .
odes; and (IV) presence of opportu
Stic disease and/or rare types
ancer, including one known as _ Kaposi
ircoma.
Yiauals 1 al I tne
is I at S suffer fr impa e
; " ¥ er . .
, i
ARAMA LL i >| 40 i si c sc ives |
rT rer —_ “
— 21 yy ai
a Oe Classifticatiol! syste I
, c THT y ~ ; Virue T's [|
man T-Lymphotropic Virus Type II
. V3 . rt
Lymphadenopathy-A Associated Virus Infe
T ems
n, 105 Annals Internal Med. 234
986) [hereinafter Classification].
Oo »¢ Ge et Gie, Mothers of Lfil al
tt the Acquired Immunodeficie
+ +o - ‘Q ~ y ext nade

Symptoms classified under Class IV

most severely impair the body's sys-

7
tems.*? Such patients generally have

Syndrome Evidence for Both Symptomatic
and Asymptomatic Carriers, 253 J. A.M.A.
363. (June 1985) [hereinafter Mothers]
(indicating 30-50% of children born to
seropositive mothers develop AIDS and
that seropositive women who become preg-
nant are at increased risk of developing
Class IV AIDS themselves). As a result,
the hemophiliac community has recom-
mended that those who are seropositive
give "Serious consideration... to
deferring pregnancy." Hemophilia Info.
Exchange, AIDS, HTLV-III and
Hemophilia: Your Questions Answered,
AIDS Update 4 (Apr. 1986); see also
Provisional Public Health Service Inter-
Agency Recommendations for Screening
Donated Blood and Plasma for Antibody to
the Virus Causing Acquired Immunodefi-
ciency Syndrome, 34 MMWR 1 (Jan. 1985)
(advising persons with any evidence of
AIDS virus infection to avoid transmis-
sion through sexual] intercourse and to
refrain from donating sperm, blood,
etc.).

19 Class IV. includes four subclasses:
1) constitutional diseases; 2) neuro-
logic diseases; 3) secondary infections
diseases [including infections of
pathogens such as protozoa (amoeba- like
organisms) or helminthics (worms); the

(footnote continued on next page)

14.

multiple symptoms. While the lymphatic
and hemic systems are the bodily systems

‘
most commonly affected, “© attack upon

the respiratory system causes the
greatest number of deaths. Pneumocystis
carinii pneumonia (PCP) is present in

58% of all AIDS patients. This uncommon
form of pneumonia and a spectrum of
other respiratory infections frequently
bring about shortness of breath and

severe chest pains.

most common are pneumocytis carinii
pneumonia, diseases caused by fungi
(molds such as candidiasis or
cryptococcus), viral infections (like
cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex) and
bacterial infections (such as
mycobacterium)]; and 4) other clinical
symptoms not classifiable in other
categories. See Classification, supra

note 17; see also Revision of Def ini-
tion, supra note 15.

20 Brettman, Serologic and Epidemio-
logic Assessment of AIDS Risk, 3 Infec-
tions in Med. 18, 20 (Jan. 1986)
[hereinafter Serologic Assessment ]}.

21 PCP is the most prevalent opportun-
istic disease affecting those with AIDS.

(footnote continued on next page)

15.

=

Neurological disorders, including
dementia, AIDS-virus induced encepha-
litis, and motor and behavioral changes
are also common. ** In addition, various
bacteria and fungi attack the cardiovas-
cular system, often resulting in
congestive heart and renal failure.*?
Visual abnormalities, and even

blindness, result from viral eye’ infec-

tions, *4 while the intestinal track is

Although persons with adequately func-
tioning immune systems are fully able to
defend themselves against PCP, it has
been fatal to 45% of those AIDS patients
stricken with ‘, Daul, et al.,
Acquired Immnune Deficiency Syndrome:
An Update and Interpretation, 51 Annals
Allergy 351, 352-53 (Sept. 1983).

22 Navia, et al., The AIDS Dementia
Complex: I. Clinical Features and II.
Neuropathology, 19 Annals Neurology 517
& 525 (Apr. 1986).

23 Cohen et al., Congestive Cardiomyo-
pathy in Association with the Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome, 315 New Eng.
J. Med. 628 (Sept. 1986).

24 Friedman et al., Cytomegalovirus
Retinitis: A Manifestation of the

(footnote continued on next page)

16.

attacked through persistent month-long
bouts of diarrhea.“ In fact, it is
fair to say that there is not a single
system of the body that is not debili-
tated by the ubiquitous infections to
which the body is susceptible after
infection by the AIDS virus.

Clearly, these conditions dras-
tically affect most major life activi-
ties. The cited studies illustrate that
people with AIDS may have difficulty
caring for themselves, performing manual
tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speak-
ing, breathing, learning and working,

among other life functions.

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
(AIDS), 67 Brit. J. Opthamology 372
(June 1983).

25 Serologic Assessment, supra
note 20, at 20.

The most common way of determining
whether someone has been exposed to the
AIDS virus is to investigate whether
antibodies to the virus (indicating pre-
vious infection) are present in the per-

son's blood. °°

Although no one. yet
knows exactly how many of the persons
testing positive for antibodies to the
AIDS virus ultimately will develop cases

of AIDS, *’ estimates run to between 20%

26 See Blattner, et al., Epidemiology
of Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type III
and the Risk of Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome, 103 Annals
Internal Med. 665 (Nov. 1985). At pres-
ent, a person's blood is determined to
have antibodies to the AIDS virus after
repeated trials with one test (the ELISA
test), followed by a more specific con-
firmatory test (Western Blot). Id. (The
confirmatory test is necessary because
the ELISA test has a significant poten-
tial for error. Carlson, et al., AIDS
Serology Testing in Low- and _ High-Risk
Groups, 253 J. A.M.A. 3405 (June 1985),.)

27 Norman, AIDS Trends: Projections
From Limited Data, 230 Sci. 1018 (Nov.
1985) [hereinafter AIDS Trends].

18.

and 303.78

Between 1 and 1.5 million people in
the United States are estimated to be
seropositive at present.” The impact
of AIDS on the economy will be enormous
if all infected with the AIDS virus’ can
be summarily excluded from the workforce

while they are able to work. °°

28 Coolfont Rep., supra note 14, at 5,
7 (factors determining expression and
progression of the disease in individ-
uals largely unknown); see Update:
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome-
United States, 35 MMWR 17 (Jan. 1986)
{hereinafter Update]. One interesting
study showed that four years after 39
newborns received transfusions of plasma
from a single donor who, to his igno-
rance, had been infected with the virus,
two had died from AIDS and three had ARC
symptoms, but the other four _ were
healthy. Lange, et al., HTLV-III/LAV
Infection in Nine Children Infected by a
Single Plasma Donor, 154 J. Infectious
Diseases 171 (July 1986) [hereinafter
Nine Children].

A

29 Coolfant Rep., supra note 14, at 4;
Update, supra note 28.

30 Among those Americans thus far
diagnosed with fully-developed AIDS, 40%

(footnote continued on next page)

19.

The incubation period for onset of
clinical AIDS is several years after
infection, with an average of 4.5
years.°>! Individuals who ultimately
will develop full AIDS are clearly
employable during the prolonged incuba-
tion period. °* Indeed, many persons who
are infected with the viruS may
nonetheless live disease-free all their

lives.°° For example, of the

are minorities (25% are Black and 14%
are Hispanic). See CDC 7/29/86 Rep.,
Supra note 13; Bakeman, et al., AIDS
Risk-Group Profiles in Whites and
Members of Minority Groups, 315 New Eng.
J. Med. 191 (July 1986). All but 7% of
those currently infected in the U.S. are
male. Women and AIDS, Newsweek 60
(July 14, 1986).

31 Periods of up to 7 years have been

reported thus far. Peterman, et al.,
Epidemiology of the Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), 7

Epidemiological Rev. 1 (1985); AIDS
Trends, supra note 27, at 1018.

32 Workplace, supra note 9.

33 Health & and Pub. Policy Comm'n,
Amer. C. Physicians, & the Infectious

(footnote continued on next page)

20.

approximately 20,000 hemophiliacs in the
United States (90% of whom are now
seropositive), only about 100, or 2%,
have fully developed Aips.>* This is
particularly significant because most

hemophiliacs were infected at the earli-

est stages of the epidemic as a result

of direct injections of infected
: 35 ais
lood. Thus, the data demonstrate

Diseases Soc'y Amer., Position Paper:

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 104
Annuals Internal Med. 575 (Apr. 1986)
[hereinafter Position Paper]; see also
Mothers, note 18, Supra.

34 Levine, The Acquired Immuno-
deficiency Syndrome In Persons With
Hemophilia, 103 Annais Internal Med. 723
(Nov. 1985); see also Melbye, et al.,
Long-Term Seropositivity For Human
T-Lymphotropic Virus Type III in Homo-
sexual Men Without the Acquired Immuno-
deficiency Syndrome: Development of
Immunologic and Clinical Abnormalities,
104 Annals Internal Med. 496
(Apr. 1986).

35 Evatt, Coincidental Appearance of
HTLV-III/LAV Antibodies in Hemophiliacs
and the Onset of the AIDS Epidemic, 31
New Eng. J. Med. 483 (Feb. 1985); AIDS,
Supra note ll, at 50.

21.

that almost all individuals exposed to
the virus are capable of many productive
years in the workplace and that,
throughout their work-lives, many will
remain just as productive as their co-
workers who have not been infected.
This fact is recognized by the gov-
36

ernment's own CDC,

B. The AIDS Virus Is Not Casually
Transmitted.

The AIDS virus is not spread in the
air by droplet infection as are the com-
mon cold, influenza or tuberculosis. >’

Fragile and killed by most household

36 Workplace, supra note 9; see also

Recommendations for Preventing
Transmission of Infection with Human
T-Lymphotrophic Virus Type III/

Lymphadenopathy-Associated Virus During
Invasive Procedures, 35 MMWR 221
(Apr. 1986) (CDC explanation of how sur-
geons with AIDS can continue to perform
their duties if they -take limited
specified precautions).

37 See Education, supra note 9.

22.

Gisinfectants including, apparently,
38 ee
soap and water, it is spread only via
specific routes Dy transmission of
infected blood, semen or vaginal fluids
(and, possibly, mother's milk) from one
39 ear
person to another. Transmission by

either semen or blood accounts for vir-

tually all reported cases.

38 Grouse, HTLV-III Transmission, 254
J. A.M.A. 2130 (Oct. 1985) [hereinafter
Transmission]; see also Recommendations
for Providing Dialysis Treatment to
Patients Infected With Human T-Lympho-
trophic Virus Type Il1I1/Lymphadenopathy-
Associated Virus, 35 MMWR 376 (June
1986) (no extraordinary precautions nec-
essary to sanitize dialysis machine
after use by AIDS patients).

39 There is no evidence of insect-
borne transmission of the virus, such as
by mosquitoes. Drotman, Insect-Borne

Transmission of AIDS?, 254 J. A.M.A.
1085 (Aug. 1985).

40 The only reported exception to
transmission by blood, semen or vaginal
fluids is a single instance of a mother
who possibly transmitted AIDS to her
infant through breast milk.

(footnote continued on next page)

23.

The routes for transmission of the

AIDS virus are limited in nuaber.*"

Recommendations for Assisting in the
Prevention of Perinatal Transmission of
Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type IIi/
Lymphadenopathy-Associated Virus and
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, 34
MMWR 721, 722 (Dec. 1985) [hereinafter
Perinatal]; see DoJ Memo, supra note 3
at 1l, n.28. Of course, newborns have
immature immune systems. See Davis,
Histopathological Changes in the Thymus
Gland, 12 Annals N.Y. Acad. Sciences
493, 495 (1986).

4) In order to protect the blood sup-
ply, in 1983 the CDC looked at clusters
of AIDS cases and determined certain
categories of people as being at higher
risks for the disease (these “high-risk”
groups were then listec as hemophiliacs,

homosexual/bisexual men with multiple
sex partners, intravenous (IV) drug
users and Haitians). Prevention of
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
(AIDS): Report of Inter-Agency
Recommendations, 32 MMWR 101 (Mar. 1983)
{hereinafter AIDS Prevention.]. Unfor-
tunately, identification of risk qroups
as opposed to risk behaviors has led
some to misperceive the disease as being
caused by being, or being in the proxim-
ity of, a homosexual or a drug user,

rather than being a disease to which
certain acts (some of which are’ sexual)
render one susceptible. For example,

(footnote continued on next page)

24.

Anal intercourse has been the predomi-

nant route among cases documented to

42 ; ' ;
; However, transmission via

despite public perceovtions to the con-
trary, lesbians are the group least
likely to become infected. Gay Women
and Risk of AIDS, L.A. Times, Apr. 2,
1986, at Vl, col. 2.

Some still cling to the “high-risk
group" terminology and simultaneously
claim that many cases do not fall into
any known risk group, a claim which
seems calculated to create concern about
possible "unknown" routes of transmis-
sion. See, e.g., DOJ Memo, supra
note 3, at 4, n.3; see also note 55,
infra.

42 Transmission by anal intercourse is
not limited to the male homosexuals’ and
bisexuals, but also poses a risk of
transmission in the heterosexual commu-
nity. Melbye, et al., Anal Intercourse
As A Possible Factor in Heterosexual
Transmission of HTLV-III to Spouses of
Hemophiliacs, 312 New Eng. J. Med. 85/7
(Jan. 1985); Redfield, et al., Frequent
Bidirectional Heterosexual Transmission
of HTLV-III/LAV Between Spouses, Pro-
ceedings of the Second Int'l Conf. on
AIDS (Paris) [hereinafter Paris Conf.
Proc.] 125 (June 1986) [hereinafter
Bidirectional].

Anal intercourse poses more of a
risk for transmission than vaginal

(footnote continued on next page)

23.

vaginal intercourse also is_ known to

occur. *? A single penile-vaginal

intercourse because the wails of the
rectum contain numerous’ blood vessels
and are more easily torn. See AIDS,
supra note ll.

43 Kreiss, et al., Antibody to Human
T-Lymphotropic Virus Type III in Wives
of Hemophiliacs, 102 Annals’ Internal
Med. 623 (May 1985); Redfield, et al.,
Frequent Transmission of HTLV-III Among
Spouses of Patients With AIDS-Related
Complex and AIDS, 253 J. A.M.A. 1571
(Mar. 1985). Widespread misinformation
about the manner of transmission has led
many erroneously to believe that only
those in high-risk groups will be
exposed to AIDS virus. Nonetheless, a
greatér proportional - increase in
heterosexual transmission is expected.
By 1991, it is estimated that 7,000
fully developed AIDS cases (9% of the
total in the U.S.) will be the result of
heterosexual transmission. Coolfont
Rep., supra note 14, @&t vs Bae In some
African countries, vaginal intercourse
already is believed to be the primary
method of transmission. Mann, et al.,
Prevalence of HTLV-III/LAV in Household
Contacts of Patients With Confirmed AIDS
and Controls in Kinshasa, Zaire, 256
J. A.M.A. 721 (Aug. 1986). Further,
while in 1983, 71% of the AIDS cases in
Haiti were among individuals in groups
regularly engaging in high-risk activi-

(footnote continued on next page)

26.

Wal sche Marto LE MNOE

bam OC Be

et ea ee th.F tl ee ty

ede etl 4a elt Fe Te LS

ae

pty AL

a

ee ee ee

aE EY Ce a Rag OM Nellie hij | AIM TA be

contact may be sufficient.”

There is a public misconception
that any personal bodily contact mey
spread the disease. However, kissing
has never been documented as a transmis-

)
sion route. This is also true for

ties, by 1985, 71% of the cases were
among individuals outside such groups.
Women and AIDS, supra note 30; see also
Culmeck, et al. Seroepidemiological
Studies of HTLV-III Antibody Prevalence
Among Selected Groups _ of Heterosexual
Africans, 254 J. A.M.A. 2599 (Nov. 1985)
(16% of heterosexuals in Zaire and
Rwanda infected). But see

Female-to-Male Transmission of HTLV-III
(Letters) 255 J. A.M.A. 1702 (Apr.
1986). Thus, it is important that deci-
sions with an _ impact upon persons
exposed to the AIDS virus be made for
the population as a whole and not be
based upon unscientific moral judgments
of certain high-risk group behavior.

44 Peterman, Study Documents Hetero-
sexual Transmission, 1 AIDS Alert 5 (May
1986); Some experts believe the disease
can be readily transferred
heterosexually. Women and AIDS, supra
note 30; Bidirect. nal, supra note 42.

45 Casual, supra note 7; see also
Infrequency of Isolation of HTLV-II

(footnote continued on next page)

au.

te. 46
Oral-genital sex.

The most direct route of transmis-
sion is through exchange of blood prod-
ucts. This can occur when intravenous
(IV) drug users share infected needles.
In addition, until AIDS was recognized,

and the nation's’ blood supply tested,

transmission occurred through the
transfusion of contaminated blood.
Finally, newborn infants born of

infected mothers may receive contami-

nated blood in utero. *’

Virus From Saliva In AIDS, 313 New Eng.
J. Med. 1606 (Dec. 1985); HTLV-III
Exposure During __ Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation, 313 New Eng. J. Med. 1606
(Dec. 1985) (paramedics giving mouth-to-
mouth resuscitation to infected individ-
uals tested negative for antibodies to
the virus).

46 See Casual, supra note 6; Lymon, et
al., Minimal Risk of Transmission of
AIDS-Associated Retrovirus Infection by
Oral-Genital Contact, 255 J. A.M.A. 1703
(Apr. i986).

47 See Mothers, supra note 18.

28.

i ET SIP

Transmission to hemophiliacs has

been contained through new blood treat-
48 ;

ments. Because condoms appear tc be

effective in preventing transmission of
; 49

the virus via semen, and because anal

intercourse can be replaced with safer

“ 50 oe
sexual practices, transmission among
male homosexuals and bisexuals’ has

slowed as those groups have responded to

48 Case for Concluding Heat Treated
Licensed Anti-Hemophiliac Factor Is Free
From HTLV-III, Lancet 890 (Oct. 19,
1985).

49 Condoms Prevent Transmission of
AIDS-Associated Retrovirus, 255
J. A.M.A. 1706 (Apr. 1986). Indeed, an
agency funded in part by a grant from
the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services recommends condoms as the only
necessary precaution for sexual prac-
tices by hemophiliacs. Hemophilia Info.
Exchange, Hemophilia and Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS): Intimacy
and Sexual Behavior, AIDS Update 1
(Sept. 1985).

50 CDC, 1985 STD Treatment Guidelines,
34 MMWR (Supp.) 75S (Oct. 1985) (iden-
tifying safe sexual behaviors).

29.

education. ~- Transfusion-associated
transmission also has been contained

through development of antibody tests.°¢

51 Behavioral Changes, supra note 14.
But see Moss et al., Progression to AIDS
in Men Seropositive for LAV/HTLV-III:
One-year Followups of San Francisco
General Hospital Study, Paris Conf.
Proc. 152 (June 1986) [hereinafter
Progression]; Coolfont Rep., supra
note 14, at 7, 12 (IV drug abusers are
the major reservoir for transmission to
the community at large). Because of the
illicit nature of IV drug users' activi
ties, they are the most difficult group
to reach with education efforts. Id.;
see also Bowers v. Hardwick, 106 S. Ct.
2841 (1986) (finding no constitutional
barrier to state anti-sodomy laws, which
laws may make identification of those
engaging in anal intercourse difficult,
thereby impeding education of at-risk
individuals); Paterat, et al.
Serological Markers as Indicators of
Sexual Orientation in AIDS Virus -
Infected Men, 256 J. A.M.A. 712 (Aug.
1986) (two seropositive U.S. airmen,
without known risk factor, who were
tested for markers of several diseases
associated with male homosexual behavior
had results which placed the probability
at 1 in 19,000 that they did not belong
to homosexual high-risk group).

52 Provisional Public Health Service
Inter-Agency Recommendations for

(footnote continued on next page)

30.

a a ae ee

These data demonstrate that trans-
mission of the virus occurs almost
exclusively via specific routes in which
infected blood products, semen or
vaginal fluids come into contact with
another's blood. No evidence exists of
"casual" transmission. Indeed, only two
cases have been documented of transmis-
sion of the virus other than by the
activities described above, both
involving individuals acting as_ health
care workers who failed to follow CDC
guidelines while caring for AIDS

patients.>>

Screening Donated Blood and Plasma for
Antibody to the Virus Causing Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome, 34 MMWR 1

(Jan. 1985).

53 One case concerned a mother respon-
sible for her infected child's’ medical
care, Although this woman behaved like
a health care worker (drawing her
child's blood through in-dwelling body

(footnote continued on next page)

31.

The DoJ Memo's only support for its
Claim that the AIDS virus might be
transmitted by casual contact consists
of these two cases, a single instance of
possible transmission through a mother's

milk,>* a subsequently retracted comment

tubes and changing surgical dressings,
among other things), she did not follow
recommended CDC precautions for. such
individuals: she did not wear gloves or
wash her hands immediately after blood
Or secretion contact. The CDC cautions
against over-generalizing the risk
factor from this’ case: "The contact
between the reported mother and child is
not typical of the usual contact that
could be expected in a family setting."
Apparent Transmission of Human
T-Lymphotropic Virus Type _ III/Lympha-
denopathy-Associated Virus From a Child
to a Mother Providing Health Care, 35
MMWR 76 (Feb. 1986) [hereinafter Child
To Mother]; see also DoJ Memo, supra
note 3, at ll, n.30.

The other case concerned a health
care worker who also did not follow rec-
ommended CDC precautions. She had pro-
longed contact with an AIDS patient's
body excretions and secretions, and had
chronic eczema on her hands so that her
own blood was exposed to the patient's
virus-containing fluids. Child to
Mother, supra note 53.

54 Perinatal, supra note 40.

32.

erroneously attributed to Dr. William
Haseltine of the Harvard Medical

School,”

and the implication that cases
of casual transmission lurk among what
the Department of Justice inaccurately

refers to as the "6%" of cases not clas-

sified in a high-risk group. °°

55 See DoJ Memo, supra note 3, at 13,
n.38, (citing to Dershowitz, Crucial
Steps in Combating the AIDS Epidemic;
Emphasize Scientific Information, N.Y.
Times, Mar. 18, 1986, at A27, col. 2).
The substance of the comment attributed
to Dr. Haseltine in the New York Times
(that AIDS more than likely will be
casually transmitted) was subsequently
retracted and "clarified" in that same
periodical. Dershowitz, On Transmission
(Letter), N.Y. Times, Apr. 5, 1986, at
14, col. 8. As a result, the author of
the DoJ Memo, Charles Cooper, publicly
apologized to Dr. Haseltine, and added
assurances from the Public Health Ser-
vice that "non-sexual person-to-person
contacts” in the workplace did not cre-
ate a risk of transmission. U.S.
Apologizes to AIDS Researcher, N.Y.
Times, July 23, 1986, at D20, col. 4.

56 As of July 29, 1986, only 3.1% of
cases to date are of unknown origin.

(fcotnote continued on next page)

33.

Comprehensive research on those
extensively exposed to persons with AIDS
demonstrates that the AIDS virus is not

spread by casual contact.’ As a

CDC _ _7//29/86 Rep., supra note 12). More-
over, although, 1,206 patients could not
be placed in an identified at-risk group
as of May 1985, further investigation
has explained the lack of placement in
nearly all cases. Update, supra note
28.

57 During the past five years over
1,750 health care workers who have
treated AIDS patients have been studied.
Of 666 who either had penetrated their
skin with a contaminated needle or had
splashed body fluids on mucous membranes
(such as lips), only 26 tested
seropositive and only three of these did
not have an alternative possible means
of transmission. Update: Prospective
Evaluation of Health-Care Workers
Exposed Via The Parenteral or Mucous-
Membrane Route To Blood Or Body Fluids
From Patients With Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome = United
States, 34 MMWR 101 (Feb. 1985); Update:
Evaluation of Human T-Lymphotropic Virus

Type II I/Lymphadenopathy-Associated
Virus Infection in Health Care
Personnel - United States, 34 MMWR 575
(Sept. 1985). In another investigation

of 150 health workers with -needle-stick
(footnote continued on next page)

34.

result, the CDC has recommended that

routine serologic testing for evidence

of the AIDS virus is unnecessary for

medical care workers, including those

performing surgical, dental, or child-

birth procedures. °°

injuries, not one was seropositive after
four years, although some had severe

penetrations. Henderson, et al., Risk
of Nasocomial Infection With Human
T-Cell Lymphotrophic Virus Type

Il11/Lymphadempothy-Asscciated Virus in
Large Cohort of Intensively Exposed
Health Care Workers, 104 Annals Internal
Med. 644, 647 (May 1986); see also

Tsoukas, et al., "Risk of Transmission
of HTLV-III/LAV From Human Bites," Paris
Conf. Proc. 125 (six months after 30
health care workers were bitten or
scratched by a brain-damaged hemophiliac
with AIDS, none tested seropositive).

58 Recommendations for Preventing
Transmission During Invasive Procedures,
35 MMWR 221 (Apr. 1986); see also Sacks,
AIDS and a Surgeon, 313 New Eng. J. Med.
1017 (Oct. 1985) (two years after the
death from AIDS of a surgeon who per-
formed invasive procedures, no instance
of seropositivity has been reported in
any of 400 of his patients).

33.

In no instance has a family or
household member of over 17,000 AIDS
patients, who was not the patient's sex-
ual partner, contracted AIDS.°? Seven
Studies of over 350 family members have
failed to find any virologic evidence of

ee 60
transmission.

59 Child To Mother, supra note 53.
But see note 53, supra.

60 Id. In one study, the contacts
between family members’ included shared
toothbrushes (7%), towels (37%), eating
utensils (25%), dishes (46%), drinking
Glasses (48%), bed (37%), toilets (90%),
and baths and showers (92%). Moreover,
over 19% of the family members had
kissed the patient on the lips and 83%
had kissed on the cheek. Freidland, et
Sass Lack of Transmission of
HTLV-III/LAV Infection to Household
Contacts of Patients With AIDS or
AIDS~Related Complex with Oral
Candidiasis, 314 New Eng. J. Med. 344,
346 (Feb. 1986); see also Melbye, et
al., Anal [Intercourse As A_ Possible
Factor In Heterosexual Transmission of
HTLV-III to Spouses of Hemophiliacs, 312
New Eng. J. Med. 857 (Mar. 1985) (no
members of any hemophiliac household,
except sexual partners, have been found

(footnote continued on next page)

36.

In light of the case against casual
transmission, CDC has recommended that
children infected with AIDS be permitted
to attend school within limited precau-
tionary guidelines. °! Similarly, CDC
has determined that persons with AIDS
should be permitted unrestricted access
to work in food service, health care,

62

and other work settings. Summarizing

to be exposed to the virus). Compare
above scientific studies with Brief of
Cong. Dannemeyer, et al., at 19 n.?7
(admitting that there are no known cases
of transmission by saliva or air, but
baldly asserting [based upon d
miscitation to a publication that admits
to being “biased in favor of believing
the worst” about AIDS, McKeever, The
Number One Issue, AIDS Update Newsletter
1 (Apr. 1985)] that there supposedly is
a "consensus" among “some [unnamed] doc-
tors" that AIDS may be passed by
kissing, mouth-to-mouth resuscitation
and sharing of glasses or toothbrushes).

61 Education, supra note 9.

62 Indeed, the CDC unqualifiedly has
concluded that "[t]he kind of nonsexual

(footnote continued on next page)

37.

all the data arguing against casual
transmission, an eeitorial in the New

England Journal of Medicine urged: "It

is now time . .. to take a more influ-
entiai and active role in quelling this

hysteria over the casual transmission of

arps."°?

C. Protecting Persons Infected With
The AIDS Virus Against
Discrimination And Exclusion
Would Not Adversely Affect The
Public Health Powers Of
Government.

Because transmission of the AIDS

64
virus cannot occur casually, the

person-to-person contact that generally
occurs among workers and clients or con-
sumers in the workplace does not pose a
risk for transmission of HTLV-III/LAV."
Workers infected by the AIDS virus
"should not be restricted from using
telephones, office equipment, toilets,
showers, eating facilities, and water
fountains." Workplace, supra note 9, at
682, 694.

63 Casual, supra note 7.

64 See District 27 School Bd. v. Bd.
of Educ., 130 Misc. 2d 398, 502 N.Y.S.2d

(footnote continued on next page)

38.

—_ oe

prestigious American College of Physi-
cians has adopted the position that

[Q]uarantining persons with AIDS
Or persons who have been exposed
to. [the AIDS virus]... is. an
unjustified invasion of individ-
ual liberty and privacy... .
[Q]uarantine . . . would not be
productive. In fact, it would
communicate a false sense of
security... [so that some]
might believe that the incarcer-
ation of such persons makes it
safe to engage in sexual and
drug practices known to transmit
the . . . infection.,®5

Thus, the spectre painted by Petitioners

325 (1986) (holding that children with
AIDS were not required by law to _ be
excluded from school system because the
risk of transmission in the school
setting is nonexistent).

65 Position Paper, supra note 33, at
578 (emphasis in original) (adding that
quarantine likely would result in non-
reporting of many cases and loss of
cooperation of those whose activities
place them at risk for the disease); see
also Coolfont Rep., supra note 14, at
14; Local Health Officers Meet in
Washington to Make Recommendations to
Mayors, 3 AIDS Info. Exchange l, 5 (Feb.
1986).

39.

and others°® of public health laws being
rendered impotent as a result of cover-
age of AIDS under laws protecting the
handicapped is without substance.

The medical profession has_ recom-
mended that persons’ infected with the
AIDS virus fully participate in life's
activities, with all individuals
(infected or not) remaining responsible
for preventing exposure. Given the
virus’ limited routes of transmission,
this 1s easily done, if people are ade-
quately educated. Thus, quarantine is

: : 67
neither necessary nor constructive,

66 Brief of Petitioners, at 26-27,
n. 5; Brief of the United States, at 16,
n.14; Brief of Cong. Dannemeyer, et
al., at 14-16.

67 The problem Petitioners and their
amici pose is, in any event, non-
existent. If in extreme cirumstances,
quarantine were justified for a particu-
lar individual because of real dangers
to others in the workplace, that person
would no longer be “otherwise qualified"
under the Act. See infra, pp. 59-62.

40.

II. THE LEGAL AUTHORITIES ESTABLISH
THAT PERSONS INFECTED WITH THE AIDS
VIRUS ARE PROTECTED UNDER THE ACT.

A. Persons Infected With The AIDS
Virus Are Handicapped Within
The Meanino Of The Statute.

A handicapped person, entitled to
protection under Section 504 of the Act,
is any person who has (1) a physical or
mental impairment which (2) substan-
tially limits one or more of a person's
major life activities, as well as any
person with a record of, or who is
regarded as having, such an impair-

ment .°° The terms "physical impairment"

68 Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29
U.S.C.A. § 706(7)(B) (1985). Hence, not
only can a person's impairment make the
person handicapped, the way the person
subjectively is viewed by others can do
so also. Congress thus equated the
rights of those mistakenly treated as
handicapped with those with a verifiable
medical impairment. This definition has
no counterpart in other federal law.
See, e.g., Social Security Act, 42

(footnote continued on next page)

41.

and "major life activities" are elabo-
rated upon by regulations. °?
Under the regulations, a physical

impairment includes:

any physiological disorder or

condition, cosmetic disfigure-
ment, or anatomical loss
affecting one or more of the
following body systems: neuro-

logical; musculoskeletal; spe-
cial sense organs; respiratory,
including speech organs; cardio-
vascular; reproductive; diges-
tive; genito-urinary; hemic and
lymphatic; skin; and
endocrine.

U.S.C.A. S$ 423(d) (1983) (generally
requiring "medically determinable"
impairment for determination of disabil-
ity). See also U.S. Civ. Rts. Comm'n,
Accommodating the Spectrum of Abilities
6-10 (1983) (calling the statute's
approach a "major conceptual advance[]"
and the "most comprehensive and useful
definition to date”).

69 These regulations have been
approved by Congress. See Consolidated
Rail Corp. v. Darrone, 104 S. Ct. 1248,
1255 n.15 (1984). They also have been
copied virtually verbatim by most fed-
eral agencies, including the Dept. of
Justice, 28 C.F.R. § 41 and the Dept. of
Education, 34 C.F.R. § 104.

42.

~_ a GUS ae. eeu

oat wet) de> '-

In addition to having life-

affecting impairments to their hemic,
lymphatic, and reproductive systems,

persons who are seropositive also are

regarded as suffering the same _ impair-

ments as those who have fully developed

75 See Supra, note 18; Perinatal,
Supra note 40; AIDS Prevention, supra
note 41; and Progression, supra note 5l.
One commentator summarized the situation
as follows: "For the individual, knowl-
edge of virus infection spells almost
inevitable personal anguish. Women are
advised not to become pregnant, since
they may infect the fetus. For men or
women, pursuing marriage or even inti-
mate relationships is fraught with
extraordinary emotional trials."
Eckholm, Screening of Blood for AIDS
Raises Civil Liberties Issues, N.Y.
Times, Sept. 30, 1985, Al, col. 2.

48.

aips. /° For example, the insurance

industry has advocated mandatory testing
to screen out seropositive persons on
the assumption that these persons are
likely to develop AIDS and incur associ-
ated health care costs.’ Employers
fear increased costs of employee bene-
fits as well as negative publicity asso-

ciated with AIDS and those who are

— 7
seropositive.

76 The Justice Department further has
admitted that someone who is only
seropositive "may .. . be handicapped
under Section 504 if he is perceived as
suffering from the disability effects of
AIDS or ARC." DoJ Memo, supra note 3,
at 28 and 29 n.74.

77 See, e.qg., Keppel, Insurers Try to
Screen Out AINS Cases, L.A. Times, §$ 4,
at 1, col. 1 (Oct. 11, 1985).

78 See CCH, AIDS: Employer Rights and
Responsibilities 29 (1985); see also

Shipp, Physical Suffering is Not the
Only Pain AIDS Can Inflict, N.Y. Times
at A8, col. 1 (Feb. 7, 1986) (describing
employer and public reaction to persons

(footnote continued on next page)

49.

These examples illustrate the pre-
dicament faced by seropositive persons,
most of whom may never develop any obvi-
ous debilitating Symptoms. Solely
because of the presence of the AIDS
virus, these individuals are regarded as
having AIDS and its associated problems.
AS a result, they face the same discrim-
ination as_ do persons with fully
developed AIDS.

To date, the only final reported
AIDS employment discrimination case

found the condition to be a handicap. 7?

perceived as having AIDS). Because of a
Similar fear arising from the high costs
of caring for AIDS patients, and despite
opposition from public health officials
in his department, Secretary of Health
and Human Services Otis Bowen Signed an
order in February 1986 that would
require testing of all permanent’ immi-
grants to the United States. Cimons,
All Immigrants Face AIDS Test, L.A.
Times, $l, at 1, col. 3 (Feb. 4, 1986).

79 Shuttlesworth Vv. Broward County
Office of Management & Budget Policy,

(footnote continued on next page)

50.

Federal administrative regulations and

rulings are in accord. °9 Most

FCHR 85-0624, slip op. (Fla. Comm'n on
Human Relations, Dec. ll, 1985),
reprinted in Daily Lab. Rep. (BNA) No.
242, E-l, E-5 (Dec. 17, 1985) (decided
under statute modeled after § 504).

80 Persons with AIDS are presumed to
be disabled under supplementary security
income regulations. 20 C.F.R.
§ 416.934(k) (1986). Further, the Dept.
of Health and Human Services Office of
Civil Rights' ("OCR's") regional offices
have concluded that AIDS and 1less-
developed forms of the infection are
covered under the Act. OCR Region IV
Letter Ruling re Complaint No.
04-84-3096 (Aug. 5, 1986) (decided after
release of DoJ Memo); OCR Region IX,
Your Rights as a Person with AIDS or ARC
(undated release); see also Education,
supra note 9 (CDC considered the protec-
tion of handicapped AIDS-infected chil-
dren under Section 504 in developing
recommendations). Even an internal memo
prepared by the civil rights division of
the Justice Department prior to prepara-
tion of the DoJ Memo concluded that
those suffering from AIDS or related
conditions are entitled to protection
under the Act. Note, AIDS and
Employment Discrimination under the
Federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and
Virginia's Rights of Persons with
Disabilities Act, 20 U. Richmond L. Rev.
425, 432 (1986).

Sl.

commentators also agree that discrimina-
tion against someone infected with the

AIDS virus squarely falls within the

scope of conduct prohibited by the
81

Act Thus, individuals, infected with
the AIDS virus are "handicapped individ-
uals" within the meaning of Section 504

of the Rehabilitation Act.

Section 504 does not expressly

exclude those infected with the AIDS

virus (or any other disease which has a

81 see, e.g., Note, supra note 80, at
439 ("Forcing employers to accept
ESCEB « « ‘s and discontinue
discriminatory practices has been the
role of the courts in other areas of
Civil rights litigation and it is
equally appropriate here"); Smith, et
al., High Court Eyed for Guidance on
AIDS as Handicap, Legal Times 35, 39
(June 30, 1986) ("In view of the 1 mil-
lion or more Americans estimated to be
infected with this AIDS virus, the
Supreme Court may be understandably
reluctant, without further legislative
directive, to exclude contagious dis-
eases from protection of the _ federal
handicap law").

contagious aspect) from coverage. Peti-
tioners and their amici hence make _ an
unfounded attempt to establish an

implied exclusion of contagious diseases
82

from the Act's scope.
Yet, in 1978, when Congress amended

the statutory definition to expressly

82 See Brief of Petitioners, at 25-28;
see also Brief of Solicitor General at
16-18; Brief of Cong. Dannemeyer, et
al., at 8-14. Indeed, their argument is
not so much exclusion at all, but
instead that individuals with diseases
such as AIDS (or TB) supposedly are
inevitably discriminated against "solely
on the basis of" contagion (or expected
future deterioration) and not on the
basis of their handicapping conditions
at all -- as if contagion (or deteriora-
tion) could somehow be divorced from
other aspects of the handicapping condi-
tion. - Rather, the contagion is an inte-
gral part of the handicapping condition.
Discrimination on the _ basis of conta-
gion, thus is discrimination on the
basis of the handicap. To allow the
facile distinction between the two would
render the protection given by the Act
to those with contagious (or
deteriorating) diseases illusory. See
infra, note 86.

93.

exclude alcoholics and drug addicts

whose current use of alcohol or drugs
precludes adequate or safe job perfor-

mance, °> it chose not to exclude conta-

; , 84
gious disease from coverage.

Adoption of a blanket implied
exception for contagious diseases would

undermine Congressional intent to evalu

ate each claimed handicap on an

83 Rehabilitation Act of 1973, §$ 504,
29 U.S.C.A. § 706(7)(B) (1985). Signif-
icantly, even there, ~Congress did not
entirely remove the handicapping condi-
tions of alcoholism and drug addiction
from coverage, but’ instead required
case-by-case determinations as to
whether each individual's current condi-
tion prevents adequate or safe job per-
formance.

84 As this Court noted in Grove City
College v. Bell, 104 S. Ct. 1211, 1217
(1984), because antidiscrimination laws
arise from concerns of broad scope, this
Court has been “reluctant to read [into
the statute] a limitation not apparent
on its face." Interestingly, the Solic-
itor General himself argued, in Bowen vy,
American Hospital Assoc., 106 S. Ct.
2101 (1986), Section 504.

54.

individual basis, which the Act
expressly contemplates. Courts rou-
tinely have effectuated this intent 2°

Moreover, many disabilities that
Congress defined as severe under related
provisions are virally induced and
therefore contagious in some way at some

86

point in time. Given the high

85 See, e.qg., Doe v. New York Univ.,

666 F.2d 761, 775 (2d Cie. 1981)
(evaluating claim of mental impairment
by reference to plaintiff's medical

records and treatment by defendant).

86 Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29
U.S.C.A. §$§ 706(13) (1985) defines a
"severe handicap" requiring multiple
services over an extended time period as
a disability which results from, among
other conditions, “blindness, cancer,
multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy,
neurological disorders (including stroke
and epilepsy) paraplegia, guadriplegia,

and other spinal conditions. ..." Of
these, many have a manifestation pre-
sumed contagious at some stage. For
example, blindness 1S a symptom of
cytomegalovirus retinitis; viruses are

suspected of causing many forms of can
cer, and the Epstein-Barr virus has been

(footnote continued on next page

incidence of contagiousness in
disabilities Congress explicitly
intended to cover, this Court should not
Circumscribe the congressionally man-
dated definition of handicap’ under

Section 504 by finding an implied excep-

, 8
tion for contagious diseases.

linked to lymphoma; multiple sclerosis,
encephelitis, and polio are virally
induced; and polio and Guillian-Barre
Syndrome can result in paraplegia.
Mandell, et oa Principles and
Practices of Infectious Diseases (2d ed.
1984).

Courts also have regularly recog-
nized persons with such diseases as
falling within the protection of S$ 504.
See e.g., Pushkin v. Regents of Univ. of
Col., 658 F.2d 1372 (10th Cir. 1981)
(persons with multiple sclerosis
covered). See also Floum, The _ Federal
Rights of Hansen's Disease _ (Leprosy)
Patients at Kalaupapa, 6. U. Haw. lL.
Rev. 507 (1984) (noting HHS findings of
coverage of those with leprosy under
§ 504). Many of these diseases, like
AIDS, are contagious only in limited
ways and may never affect the workplace.
The differences among them further cau-
tions against a broad ruling regarding
"contagious" diseases.

87 The same holds true for any type of
blanket implied exception for

(footnote continued on next page)

56.

To prevent stereotypes and ill-
founded fears from vitiating

Section 504, contagiousness or risk to

deteriorating or progressive diseases.
Congress specifically protected the pro-
gressive and frequently deteriorating
diseases of cancer, multiple sclerosis,
muscular dystrophy, and cystic fibrosis,
without regard to the potential progress
of the condition. See Rehabilitation
Ace of 1973, 29 U.8.6-A.- § 706(13)
(1985). Further, at the time HEW pro-
mulgated its regulations HEW stated that
it "“continue[d] to believe. . . that it
has no flexibility within the statutory
definition to limit the term to persons

who have those severe, permanent, or
progressive conditions that are most
commonly regarded as _ handicaps." 45

C.F.R. Pt. 84, App. A at 310. Accord-
ingly, courts have refused to speculate
about the future development of a dis-
ease, see, e.q., Bentivegqna v. Dept. of
Labor, 694 F.2d 619, 623 (9th Cir. 1982)
("allowing remote concerns [about future
health of diabetic] to legitimize dis-
Crimination would vitiate the effec-
tiveness of section 504"), Rather,
courts have held persons with progres-
Sive diseases also to be protected by
Section 504. See, e.q., Mantolete vy.
Bolger, 767 F.2d 1416 (9th Cir. 1985)
(person with epilepsy covered; remanded
to determine if otherwise qualified);
Plummer v. Branstad, 731 F.2d 574 (8th
Cir. 1984) (Huntington's Chorea).

OT.

self and others should be permitt
justify differential treatment
handicapped individual only when
risk of transmission of illness
nificant, which 1s not the case

AIDS. In New York State Ass'n

Retarded Children v. Carey, 612 F.2d

(2d Cir. 1979), the court struck
under section 504 a decision
State Board of Education to exclude
tain mentally retarded children
school classes because they were
riers of the virus, hepatitus B.

court held that the Board failed to dem-

onstrate that the health hazard posed by

these children was "anything more than a
remote possibility .. ." and that "the
activities that occur in classroom
Settings were not shown to pose any

Signficant risk that the disease would

be transmitted from one

58.

another," Id. at 650. 88

B. Persons Infected With The AIDS
Virus Are Not, Solely By
Virtue Of Their Infection,
Automatically Rendered Not
Otherwise Qualified For _ Any
Jab.

Employer fears cannot provide the
underpinnings of an implied exception to

89 - ;
: Concerns

coverage under the Act
about contagiousness or risk to self and
others are relevant only to whether a
handicapped individual is "otherwise

er ( :;
qualified” for the job. 7” Again,

88 Cf. Doe v. New York Univ., 666 F.2d
at 777 (requiring evidence of a signifi-
cant risk of harm to self or others to
justify exclusion of individual with
history of mental illness); Mantolete,
767 F.2d at 1422 (rejecting a “mere ele-
vated risk" standard).

89 Such fears readily can be iikened
to the “outmoded stereotypes” that
employers historically have relied on to
exclude and penalize women, and that
this Court consistently has refused to
sanction. See, e.qg., Califano V.

Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199, 207 (1977).

90 The Eleventh Circuit remanded the
present action for evaluation of the

(footnote continued on next page)

39.

however, this determination requires a
case-by-case evaluation of the individ-
ual's handicapping condition in relation
to the specific requirements of the job
in question.

As shown above, persons infected
with the AIDS virus are not contagious
in the workplace and do not pose any
risk of transmission to their co-

workers. Contagiousness in other

risk posed by Respondent's health condi-
tion. Arline v. School Bd. of Nassau
County, 772 F.2d 759, 765 (llth Cir.
1985). Consequently, resolution of this
question based on the present record is
premature and the writ of certiorari as
to this question should be dismissed as
improvidently granted. See, e.q.,
Tacgarty v. Weinaker's, Inc., 397 U.S.
223 (1970).

l See Mantolete, 767 F.2d at 1423;
ee also Southeastern Community College

9
se
v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397 (1979) (deciding
whether hearing impairment rendered
applicant for nursing program not other-
wise qualified for reasons of patient
safety).

settings is simply not relevant to
whether they are “otherwise qualified”
for a specific job.

Persons infected with the virus can
work for years, both safely and well.
Currently available evidence indicates
most of these infected persons will
remain asymptomatic. Only when and if
they are no longer able to work or their
performance is unsatisfactory may indi-
viduals infected with the AIDS virus be
considered not "otherwise qualified."
This must be so because, under section

504, only present job performance may be

considered in determining whether a
handicapped individual is "ctherwise
92

qualified" for a job.

92 Who should bear the social costs of
AIDS iS a policy decision requiring
extensive study far beyond the scope of
this case. Clearly, a decision on this

(footnote continued on next page)

61.

CONCLUSION
Emotional reactions steeped in
ignorance and prejudice are precisely
the ill the Act was designed to counter.
This Court should not sanction public

hysteria as a justification for discrim-

ination. Exclusion of persons infected

with the AIDS virus from the workforce
would wreak drastic consequences on mil-
lions of Americans and their families.

Not only would victims be subjected to

issue iS premature and unwarranted in
the present case.

As noted above, however,
seropositive individuals cannot be
barred from employment because of
employers' speculative fears or concerns
about future costs. Cf. Bentivegqna, 694
F.2d at 623. Congress must have
intended a policy which allows those who
now are able to work to do so. Other-
wise, discrimination based on concerns
about later condition or the coverage of
progressive disabilities caused by other
Giseases would have been specifically
excluded instead of included. See
supra, note 87.

extreme personal hardship, >> but the

nation's economic health would be
Strained by the millions of individuals
forced to rely solely on public benefits
for their living and medical expenses,
whether or not they are actually incapa-
ble of productive employment.?*

For the reasons set forth above,
this Court must not extend the scope of

this case nor issue a broad ruling which

93 In addition to loss of needed
financial support, being fired due to
AIDS phobia can be traumatic and may
harm the health of those with already
lowered immune systems. See Welliseh,
U.C.L.A. Psychological Study of AIDS, 19
Frontiers of Radiation Therapy &
Oncology 155 (1985).

94 Moreover, if this Court were to
permit, perhaps even encourage,
employers to discharge those persons
infected with the AIDS virus but whose
bodies have fought progress of the dis-
ease, it would be weakening the very
individuals whose systems may best fight
the disease, and who offer our best hope
for developing biological resistance to
the disease.

63.

might exclude persons infected with the

AIDS virus from the protections of the
Act.
Respectfully submitted,

STANLEY FLEISHMAN*

Law Insitute for the
Disabled and Elderly
Southwestern University

School of Law
675 S. Westmoreland Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90005
(213) 738-6700

JOSEPH LAWRENCE
Western Law Center for
The Handicapped

*Counsel of Record for
Amici Curlae

Of Counsel: **
JON W. DAVIDSON

SUSAN D. MCGREIVY
PAUL HOFFMAN Tt

t Attorneys for American Civil

Liberties Union Foundation of
Southern California.

& Thanks are extended to

Mickey Wheatley, Mary Newcombe,
Christine A. Littleton, Steve Susoeff,
Sharon Oxborough, Daniella Sapriel

and Richard Green, M.D. for their
assistance in preparing this brief.

64.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

INTERESTS OF INDIVIDUAL AMICI CURIAE

This brief amici curiae > «6S
mitted on behalf f Doctors for AIDS
Research and Education (DARE). DARE is
composed of physicians and public healtt
specialists dedicated to providing
treatment to persons afflicted witt
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

(AIDS), researching medical aspects of
the disease, and educating the public
about the AIDS virus and the individuals
infected by it. As a whole, the members
of DARE represent the fullest extent of
medical knowledge and expertise cur-
rently able to be brought to bear on
issues relating to AIDS. The _ following
is a list of the members of DARE and
their qualifications:

Neil Schram, M.D. is the present

Chair of the Los Angeles City and County

la.

AIDS Taskforce, the Kaiser Permanente
AIDS Committee, and the ACLU Foundation
of Southern California Ad Hoc Taskforce
on AIDS and Civil Liberties. He is
Assistant Clinical Professor of Medi-
cine, UCLA School of Medicine anda
staff doctor at Kaiser Permanente Medi-
cal Group of Southern California. He
has treated large numbers of patients
suffering from AIDS or AIDS-Related Com-
plex (ARC).

Mervyn Silverman, M.D., M.P.H., is
the current President of the American
Foundation for AIDS Research. He is
also Director of the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation AIDS Health Services Program.
From 1977 to 1985 he served as the San
Francisco Director of Health.

Gerald Friedland, M.D. is Associate
Professor of Medicine and Associate Pro-

fessor of Epidemiology and Social

2a.

Medicine at the Albert Einstein College
of Medicine. He is also a physician at
the Montefiore Medical Center, spe-
Ccializing in the treatment of persons
with AIDS. He has treated more than 300
AIDS patients.

Donald Abrams, M.D. is Assistant
Director of the Acquired Immuno-
deficiency Syndrome/Kaposi's Sarcoma
Clinic at San Francisco General Hospi-
tal. He has treated more than 1,000
patients with acquired immune deficiency
syndrome. He serves on the AIDS Advisory
Committee of the San Francisco Depart-
ment of Public Health and on the Scien-
tific Advisory Committee of the AIDS
Foundation of San Francisco. He pres-
ently is conducting clinical studies on
Kaposi's Sarcoma, lymphadenopathy and
opheresis in acquired immune deficiency

syndrome-related conditions. He has

3a.

published over 35 articles on AIDS, as
well as numerous book chapters on the
subject.

Daniel William, M.D. is an instruc-
tor in clinical medicine at Columbia
University in New York. He is’ Director
of the AIDS Ambulatory Clinic at
St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center.
He 1S also a member of the American Med-
ical Association AIDS Panel, the New
York State AIDS Institute, and the Medi-
cal Advisory Board to the Gay Men's
Health Crisis. He has published numer-
ous articles on AIDS.

Harold Hawley, M.D. is Medical
Director of tie Whitman-Walker Clinic.
He iS a member of the District of
Columbia Taskforce on AIDS and is Asso
Ciate Pathologist for Microbiology at
the Washington, D.C. Veteran's Adminis-

tration Medical Center.

4a.

*¢

Alexandra Levine, M.D. is Executive
Associate Dean and Professor of Medicine
at USC School of Medicine. She is
involved in AIDS research in the areas
of treatment, natural history, specific
drugs, and treatment and evaluation.
She has treated over 500 people infected
with the AIDS virus.

David Ostrow, M.D., Ph.D. is Direc-
tor of the Psychobiology Program, Uni-
versity of Michigan School of Medicine.
He is a member of the Steering Committee
of the National Multi-Center AIDS Cohort
Study and a member of the AIDS Expert
Advisory Panel for the American Medical
Association. He is organizer and
Chairperson for the Chicago Area AIDS
Taskforce and Chairperson for the
Chicago Department of Health, AIDS Advi-
sory Panel. He also organized the

International AIDS Prospective

5a.

Epidemiology Network. He has worked
with over 200 patients with AIDS.

Dennis McShane, M.D. is Acting
Chief of Rheumatology at Palo Alto Vet-
eran's Administration Hospital and Clin-
ical Assistant Professor of Medicine at
Stanford University. He founded the
American Association of Physicians for
Human Rights, and served as its Presi-
dent in 1982/83. From 1983 to 1986, he
served on the Stanford Medical Center's
AIDS Taskforce. In addition, Dr. Shane
presently serves on the California AIDS
Budget Taskforce and the California AIDS
Strategic Planning Commission. He _ also
presently chairs the Stanford Medical
Center AIDS Committee. He has treated
up to 100 people with AIDS and many more
with ARC,

Peter Heseltine, M.D. is the Chief

Physician and Hospital Epidemiologist of

6a.

the Los Angeles County/USC Department of
Epidemiology, and Assistant Director of
the Los Angeles County/USC Medical Cen-
ter AIDS Clinic, which sees about one
third of all patients with AIDS in Los
Angeles County. He served as
Coordinator of the USC AIDS Study Group
in 1983/84. He presently is supervising
a research study on health worker AIDS
transmissions. He has treated more than
600 patients with AIDS.

Joel Weisman, D.O. co-directs’ the

largest non-public AIDS unit in the

country, located in Sherman Oaks,
California. He is one of the doctors
who first identified the clinical

syndrome of AIDS and reported the
syndrome to the Centers for Disease Con-
trol. He serves on the faculty of the
UCLA Department of Medicine. He has
treated more than 500 patients with AIDS

and more than 1,500 patients with ARC.

7a.

James Lipsett, M.D. is Associate
Director of the City of Hope National
Medical Center, Division of Radiation
Oncology, and an instructor at the USC
School of Medicine. He serves on the
Medical Advisory Committee for AIDS Pro-
ject Los Angeles.

Stuart Nichols, M.D. is Associate

Chief of Medical and Psychiatric Ser-

vices at the Methadone Maintenance
Treatment Program, Beth Israel Medical
Center, New York City, and Senior

Instructor in Psychiatry, Mount Sinai
School of Medicine, City University of
New York. He has edited a book enti-

tled, Psychiatric Implications of AIDS,

and written a chapter on psychotherapy
and AIDS in another book. He has_ given
numerous lectures on AIDS at conferences
all over the United States. He serves

as an AIDS consultant to the National

8a.

Institutes of Mental Health, Drug Addic-
tion, and Allergy and Infectious Dis-
eases. He also serves on the AIDS Com-
mittee of the American Psychiatric
Association and the New York City Dis-
trict Branch Taskforce on AIDS. He has
seen more than 500 patients with AIDS.
Roger Detels, M.D. is Professor of
Epidemiology at UCLA School of Public
Health, and served as Dean of that
school from 1980 to 1985. He serves on
the American Foundation of AIDS

Research's Scientific Advisory Commit-

tee, and on the Southern California
CARES Professional Advisory Taskforce
for AIDS Project Los Angeles. He also

serves as Chair of the Analysis Comnit-
tee for the Multi-Center AIDS Coopera-
tive Study. He has published articles
on AIDS and has completed a study on the

natural history of AIDS in gay men.

9a.

Constance Wofsy, M.D. is Co-
Director of AIDS Activities at San
Francisco General Hospital, and is
Assistant Chief of the Infectious Dis-
eases Division there. The AIDS clinic
she oversees treats over 1,000 patients
with AIDS or ARC each month. Dr. Wossy
is the principal investigator for
Women's AIDS Research and Education.
She has researched the development of
AIDS opportunistic infections and
heterosexual modes of transmission. She
also has lectured and published exten-
Sively on the subject of AIDS.

Nick Ifft, M.D. is one of the

founding members of the Philadelphia

n

AIDS Taskforce, and has served as it:

Vv

president since 1983. He has treated
over 90 patients with AIDS and over 200
patients with ARC in the first six

months of 1986.

10a.

Michael Roth, M.D. is’ Assistant
Clinical Professor at U.C.L.A. Depart-
ment of Medicine, Clinical Immunology
and Allergy Section. He is co-chair of
the California AIDS Commission and a
member of the California Assembly Budget
Task Force on AIDS. He serves on the
staff of the U.C.L.A. AIDS Center, and
as medical advisor to AIDS Project Los
Angeles and the Los Angeles City Coun-
cil. He has published numerous articles
on AIDS and has treated over 200 persons
with the disease.

Michael Kaiser, M.D. is the Direc-
tor of Emergency Care at Children's Hos-
pital in New Orleans, Louisiana, and
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department
of Pediatrics at both Louisiana State
University School of Medicine and Tulane
University Medical Center. He has lec-

tured extensively on AIDS and HIV

lla.

testing. He is the leading pediatric
expert on AIDS in Louisiana.

Allen McCutchan, M.D. is a Clini-
Cian and Associate Professor in the
Division of Infectious Diseases, San
Diego Medical Center, University of
California. He serves on the University
of California Taskforce on AIDS and has
treated more than 150 people with AIDS.

Nicholaos Bellos, M.D. is Chief
Medical Resident of Tulane University
Affiliated Hospitals in New Orleans. He
iS a member of the Louisiana State
Taskforce on AIDS and Chair cf the Case
Funding/ Public Awareness Subcommittee.
He has treated more than 50 patients
with AIDS.

Peter Wolfe, M.D. is former Associ-
ate Director of the UCLA AIDS Center.
He 1S presently Assistant Clinical Pro-

fessor of Medicine at UCLA School of

l2a.

Medicine. In his private practice, he
has treated several hundred patients
with AIDS. He has published numerous

articles on AIDS.

Hal Freeman, M.A. iS a_ licensed
psychotherapist. From January 1984 to
February 1986, he served as_ Regional

Director in the Office for Civil Rights,
United States Department of Health and
Human Services, Region IX, San
Francisco, and served as Deputy Director
for that office from 1968 to 1984. He
now works with patients with AIDS. and
ARC and with AIDS-fearful persons

Thomas Mundy, M.D. ls Adjunct
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at
UCLA School of Medicine and an attending

staff physician at Children's Hospital,

Los Angeles. He currently is
researching the natural history of
infection by the AIDS virus in

recipients of blood products. He has
published papers on AIDS and has a _ num-
ber of manuscripts on AIDS in prepara-
tion. He has treated numerous’ children
afflicted with AIDS.

William Christopher Mathews, M.D.
is a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical
Scholar at UCLA Medical Center and the
Veteran's Administration Hospital,
Westwood, California, where he _ prac-
tices acquired immune deficiency
syndrome health services. He has
treated over 60 patients with AIDS and
over 300 patients with ARC. He also
served on the San Diego Mayor's
Taskforce on AIDS from 1985 to 1986, and
presently serves on the AIDS Health Ser-
vices Program of the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation.

Norbert Gilmore, M.D. is Associate

Professor at the McGill University

=
oO

b

Department of Medicine, and Associate
Physician at the Royal Victoria Hospital
in Montreal, Quebec. He chairs’ the
Canadian National Ad -sory Committee on
AIDS, and is a member of the Quebec AIDS
Committee and the Canadian Health Asso-
Ciation's Public Education Committee on
AIDS. He has researched the
epidemiology of AIDS and treated more
than 60 persons with AIDS.

Marshall Forstein, M.D. is the Med-
ical Director of the Gay and Lesbian

Counseling Service, and the AIDS Action

Committee in Massachusetts. He has
treated over 1! patients with AIDS and
many with AR

David McEwan, M.D. is the Chief of
Family Medicine at Honolulu Medical

Group. He served as President of the

AIDS Foundation of Hawaii from 1983 to

May 1986. He presently serves on the

Honolulu Mayor’s Advisory Committee on
AIDS and on the University of Hawaii's
Ad Hoc AIDS Committee. He has treated
more than 35 patients with AIDS and 150
patients with ARC.

A. Brad Truax, M.D. is a general
medical practitioner in San Diego,
California, whose practice is 75% AIDS-
related. He has treated more than

patients with AIDS. He also has 1ec-

CT
“

ed and published articles on AIDS.
He currently serves as Chair of the San
Diego County Regional AIDS Taskforce,

and 1S a member of the San Diego Mayor's

Amy Ross, Ph.D. 1S a pathologist.
She is an Adjunct Instructor, Department
of Anatomy, USC School of Medicine. She
has researched and published extensively

on issues involving AIDS.

Robert Bolan, M.D. is an Assistant
Clinical Professor at the University of
California Division of Family and Comnu-
nity Medicine, and Medical Director of
the Gay Health Care Clinic of the Pres-
byterian Hospital in San Francisco. He
serves as President of the San Francisco
AIDS Foundation, and as a member of the
San Francisco Department of Public
Health AIDS Coordinating Committee, the
AIDS Taskforce of the Director of the
San Francisco Department of Public

Health, the San Francisco Mayor's’) AIDS

Advisory Taskforce, and the San
Francisco AIDS Foundation Board of
Directors. He has treated more than 100

persons with AIDS and more than 300 with
ARC.

Brian Willoughby, M.D. is a Staff
Doctor at St. Paul's Hospital,

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and

l7a.

is a staff member of the AIDS Care Team
in Vancouver. He serves on the Advisory
Board of AIDS. He also does research
and has published articles on AIDS. He
has treated more than 20 patients with
AIDS.

James Cherry, M.D. is Professor of
Pediatrics and Chief of the Division of
Infectious Diseases at the U.C.L.A.
School of Medicine Center for the Health
Sciences. Since 1983, he has been
involved ina study on the risk of con-
tracting AIDS admidst health workers.

Kent Sack, M.D. has worked as a
clinician in an AIDS-Related Complex
(ARC) clinic for five years for the San
Francisco City Health Department. Over
7,500 people with ARC have been seen in

the clinic.

Co
6)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385012_0067%3A17. Public record. Not legal advice.
