# Petition — Woods v. North Carolina > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385003_2049%3A1 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Petition - **Published:** January 1, 1976 - **Citation:** 428 U.S. 903 ## Text . 1 d, The Constitutional provisions, treaties, statutes, ordinances, or regulations which the case involves are as follows: (i) The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizureg, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons i or things to be seized, (ii) The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution: No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation. (iii) The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted, (iv) § 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside, No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, e, Statement of the case: A concise statement of the case containing the facts material to the consideration of the questions presented: On August ll, 1973, Mrs, Paula Gail Bowman Hollar, left the home of her parents where she and her husband, Steven Hollar, were | living. Her destination was Mac Dula Studios, however she did not arrive at work that day. Her car, a 1973 Pontiac Sprint, was found in its usual parking piace on a lot located adjacent to Boundary Street in Lenoir, North Carolina. When her whereabouts could not be ascertained, her husband and several law enforcement officers began a search for her. Later that that had been seized that day, She was asked to wait and some thirty minutes later, Captain Dewey Triplett of the Lenoir Police Department and Charles Whitman, Special] Agent with the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation arrived. They questioned the defendant's wife extensively in a small interrogation room until finally she accompanied them to the trailer where she and her husband lived where the officers took two rings which subsequently were shown to have been the engagement ring and wed- ding band of the victim. At the trial, prior to selection of the jury, the district attorney testified at the request of the defendant that in the year 1973 in his three county district that 50 persons were indicted for capital offenses and that 5 were tried for the capital offense and that the remaining 45 were tried for lessor included offenses or plead guilty to lessor included offenses. He testified that the decision of whether to try a defendant for the capital offense or a lessor offense was his and his alone and that he had sole discretion to make such a determination, He further stated that due to a lack of staff he was unable to investigate the facts, stating "we are unable to screen all of our cases like the Federal Courts." At the close of the testimony of the district attorney, the defendant made a motion to quash the bill of indictment charging rape and charging first degree murder for the reason that the solicitorial discretion as was testified to by the district attorney was exercised in this case and that to allow the district attorney such discretion to determine whether a defendant shall be placed on trial for his life or for a lessor offense is in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Defendant also made a written motion to quash the bills of indietenent charging the crimes of rape, and first degree murder for the reason that the only permissable penalty under the present North Carolina law for the above offenses was the death penalty and that the death penalty constituted cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violated the EFighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Department and the defendant's sister testified for the defendant, the Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law permitting admission into evidence of the two rings, State's Exhibits 6 and 7, The defendant objected which objection was overruled and the defendant then noted an exception, being Exception No. 140 (Rp. 325). With regard to the question presented for review Numbered (c)(iii) in which defendant alleges he was denied due process of law and equal protection of the law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution for that the solicitor's discretion as exercised in this case violated the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, this question was raised at the trial, prior to empanelling of any jurors, The defendant called the District Attorney, Donald E. Greene, to the witness stand and after questioning him with regard to his practice of exercising solicitorial discretion, the defendant moved to quash the bills of indictment charging rape and first degree murder which motions to quash were overruled to which defendant noted an exception. The motions were renewed at the close of trial in motions to set aside the verdict and in arrest of judgment. These motioris were also overruled and the defendant noted exceptions. ; With respect to question presented for review numbers (c)(iv), this question of equal protection was raised by a motion to quash the bills of indictment presented prior to selection of the jury. This motion was over- ruled at that time and the defendant noted an exception, This same motion was again reviewed at the close of the trial after entry of the jury verdict at which time the motion was again overruled and the defendant noted an exception, With respect to question presented for review numbered (c)(v) in which the defendant alleges the trial court erred when it allowed the State, over defendant's objection to introduce at trial certain evidence which was 75 - 5091 IN TIE SUPREME COURT OF TITHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RRCHMIVED VERNON JUNIOR WOODS, ) JUL 14 1978 Appellant ) OFFICE UF Tk CLLKA | HEME COURT, U.S. : | he ’ ae Vv ) : PETITION FOR WRIT GF STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) CERTIORAM! ME ae Me ae Ms ae she ae ae afk afc % Me 2k xX A ME HE a aK hc ik ae af af afc afe ate ats afc ale ae ate o* Appellant respectfully petitions the Supreme Court of the United States for a Writ of Certicvari to review the decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina which found "ne error" as to appellant's conviction of first degree murder and sentence to death, In support of said petition for writ of certiorari and in accord with Rule 23 of the Supreme Court Rules, appellant respectfully shows the following: 1, The opinion of the North Carolina Supreme Court is found in the official report of the case State of North Carolina v Vernon Junior Woods, 286 N. C, 612, 213, S, E, 2d 214 (1975), A copy of the official report is appended, 2. The grounds on which the jurisdiction of this court is involved are as follows: a. The appellant was convicted of first degree murder on January 28, 1974 in the Superior Court of Catawba County, North Carolina, Notice of appeal was given; however, given to delay in preperation of the transcript of the court reporter, the appeal was not perfeéted within the time allowed; appellant petitioned for a Writ of Certiorari which was allowed by the North Carolina Supreme Court on May 8, 1974, The opinion of the North Carolina Supreme Court was filed on April 14, 1975, b, The statutory provision believed to confer on this court jurisdiction to review the decision of the North Carolina Supreme Court by | Writ of Certiorari is 28 U. S, C. Section 1257 (3); The decision of the North Carolina Supreme Court is a decision by the highest court of the State of North Carolina in which a decision could be had, On the ground if its being repugnant to the United States Constitution (te wit, the Eighth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment); and further, that a title right pcivilege or immunity especially set up or claimed under the Constitution, treatires or statutes of, or commission held, or authority exercised under the United States, c. Questions presented for review are as follows: (i) The trial court committed prejudicial error when it denied defendant's motions to quash bills of indict» ent charging the defendant with rape and murder, and in failing to grant defendant's motions in arrest of judgment for the reason that both the rape and murder charges carried as punishment a mandatory death penalty upon the conyiction, and therefore, violate the Eighth Amendme it of the United | States Constitution, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, for that the mandatory death | ' penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. (ii) The trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress certain evidence (to wit: State's Exhibits Nos. 6 and 7, an,engagement ring and a wedding band), for that the defendant's constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution were violated in that the evidence was seized by officers without the authorization of a valid search warrant, and said seizure did not fall within any of the exceptions which autho*ize a warrantless search and seizure, (iii) The defendant was denied due process of law and equal proteetion of the law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution for that a District Attorney in the State of North Carolina has th: discretion to determine whether a defendant will be tried for a capital offense, such as first degree murder, or for a lesser included offense, such as second degree murder, and such discretion is unbridl-d, and subject to no lawful check or restraint, Testimony of the District Attorney in this case indicated that of approximately fifty defendant: who were indicted for capital offenses in his jurisdiction in 1973, only five were tried for the capital offense, and the other defendants were allowed to plead non-capital offenses. Defendant contends that Furman v Georgia, 408 U. S. 38( ) should be extended to ‘orbid a state to inflict the death penalty if either the judge, jury or solicitor as a matter of discretion can choose between the death penalty or a penalty or imprisonment, (iv) Defendant was denined equal protection under the law for that the time defendant was tried in North Carolina, the only per.nissible punishment for murder or rape was death; however, in the majority of other states throughout the United States, the maximum constitutional punishment was life imprisonment, | j (v) The trial court erred when it allowed the State over | defendant's objections to introduce at trial ce “tain evidence which w’s removed from defendant's automobile which had been unconstitutionally and illegally seized from defendant and his wife, said seizure taking place prior to issuance of a search warrant, prot to issuance of an arrest warrant, ana | prior to defendant's arrest, and without any consent to any such seizure being sought or piven by defendant or his wile, | | afternoon some clothing, papers and car keys which later were identified as having belonged to the victim were found by a young boy. After further searching, the body of the victim, Mrs, Hollar, was discovered ina small creek on Sunday. An intensive investigation was begun and numerous | newspaper and radio requests were made for anyone having information about the incident to report it to the Lenoir Police Department, In subsequent days, several witnesses reported events to the Lenoir Police Department, including the witness James L, Cline who told the police that he was on his way to a local jewelry store on Saturday morning and he saw a young man and a young woman scuffling; that he didn't think toe much about it at the time and did not report the incident to anyone until after he heard the reports of the giscovery of Mrs. Hollar's body, On the following Thursday, August 16, 1973, at 9:45 A. M.. the defendant was met at his mother-in-law's home by members of the Lenoir Police Department, Defendant and his wife were in their automobile and the defendant was asked to acco.mnpany the officers to the police station for questioning. This he did, leaving his wife and car at his mother-in- law's house, The vehicle the defendant was driving, a 1967 Black over Green Chevro'!et, North Carolina License No, BMW-522, was also brought in by another police officer. No arrest warrants and no search warrants had been issued at the time and no consent was given to the taking of the automobile by either the \efendant or his wife. The defendant was held at the Lenoir Police Department until arrest warrants were issued several hours later that morning charging the defendant with kidnapping, raping and murdering Paula Gail Bowman Hollar, At 1:45 P,M, the same day a search warrant was issued for the 1967 Chevrolet which had been in the possession of the police since the sezure of the vehicle that morning. The defendant then had taken from him fingernail, hair, skin, saliva and other samples from his body, None of these samples revealed a positive match between samples taken from the body of the victim. At approximately 7:00 P.M. on Thursday, the defendant's wife came to visit the defendant at the Caldweli County Jail to bring him some food and*te inquire about her pocketbook which had been in the Chevrolet automobile The defendant made the further argument on Motion to Quash the two capital bills of indictment charging rape and first degree murder for the reason that they deny him equal protection of the law under the United States Constitution for the reason that in North Carolina the death penalty was the only permissable punishment on a conviction of rape or first degree murder, Several other states stil] retained the death penalty as permissable punishment, however the vast majority had done away with and abolished the | death penalty, If the defendant had beer, in California or another state in | which life imprisonment were the maximum penalty or if the crime had | been oubenateae in North Carolina prior to January 1973, when the North Carolina Supreme Court decided the case of Sta! e v. Waddell, 282 N.C. 431, 194 S, E, 2d 19 (1973), then the punishment for his crime could have been life imprisonment. The Court then denied each of the defendant's motions as to each bill of indictment to which the defendant made objection which objection | was overruled and defendant then noted his exception being Exception No. Record Page 56, At the close of all evidence and after the verdict of the jury had been taken, the defendi.nt moved to set aside the verdict in the kidnapping, rape and first degree murder cases for the same reason set forth previously in defendant's motion to quash bills of indictment as constituting cruel and fnusual punishment and being in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution as interpreted by Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972). f. With regard to the question presented for review Numbered (c) (ii) the question of whether the trial court committed error in denying defendant's motion to surpress certain evidence (to wit: State's Exhibits Nos, 6 and 7, an engagement ring and a wedding band), at the time the State sought to introduce the State's Exhibits Nos. 6 and 7, the defendant objected and moved for a voir dire to determine whether the State had lawfully obtained the two Exhibits Nos, 6 and 7. At the close of the voir dire during which time the defendant's mother-in-law, Nellic aye Wilson, and the defendant's brother-in-law, Clarence Wilson, testified for the State and Captain Dewey Triplett of the Lenoir Police | removed from defendant's automobile which had been unconstitutionally and illegally seized from defendant and his wife, these questions were presented by objections nade during the trial prior to the time ach item of evidence was sought to be introduced, Each of these objections was overruled and defendant noted exceptions, These exceptions are numbered as follows with the page in the record at which the exceptions appear being listed in parentheses: Exceptions Nos, 209-210 (R p 342), 211-212 (R p 348), | 225-228 (R p 361), 229-230 (R pp 361-362), 263 (R p 378), | 284-286 (R p 394), 287 (R p 409), 288-291 (R pp 414-415), 292-295 Rp 416), 296-300 (R p 417), 301-305 (R pp 417-418) | 306-30. Wp 419), 308 (R pp 419-420), 309-313 (R p 420), 314-317 (R pp 420-422), 318-319 (R p 422), 320-323 (R p 423), 324-325 (R p 424), 326-329 (R p 425), 330-333 (R pp 425-426), 324-336 (R p 427), 337-340 (R p 428), 341-345 (R p 429), 346 (R pp 429-430), 347 (R p 430), 360-362 (Rp 451), 363-364 (R pp 451-452), 365-367 (R p 453), 368-372 (R p 454), 373-376 (R p 455), 377-380 (R p 456), 381 (R p 457). All of the questions presented for review were passed on by the North Carolina Supreme Court and each assignment of error was found to be without merit, Attached in the Appendix is the official report of the North Carolina Supreme Court in the case State of North Carolina vs Vernon Junior Woods, 286 N.C. 612, 213 S.E. 2d 214 (1975). g. the Writ: Argument amplifying the reasons relied on for allowance of (i) This Tetition for Writ of Certiorari alleges as one of the grounds for allowance of the Writ. A groun: which is very similar if not identical to that raised in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by Jesse Fowler which Petition for Writ of Certiorari was granted by the United States Supreme Court, See Jesse Fowler vs State of } orth Carolina, U.S. (975). The petitioner herein, Vernon Junior Woods, wa’ tried for kidnapping, rape and murder after decision by the North Carolina Supreme Court of the case State of North C, rolina vs. Jaddell, 282 N.C. 431, 194 S.E. 2d (1973), That cas as decided on January 19, 1973 and held that all first de e murder, rape, burglary, and first degree arson cas¢ ‘curring after date of the decision would carry a mand.iory death penalty, This case came as a result of the cise of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S, 238 (1972) in which the \Inited States Supreme Court determined that the death peniliy was unconstitutional when it was imposed in the frarne work provided by the courts of the State of Georgia which allowed a jury or a judge to determine whether a per: on convicted of first degree murder would suffer the death penalty or face life inprisonment, The Supreme Court © |so vacated death sentences ina case where a defendant | co been sentenced to death by a jury which had the discretion to choose between death and prison confinement, See this shows that diseretien on the part of the District Attorney results in the vast majority of first degree cases being handled as less than capital cases, whether the defendants were tried for lesser charges or pled guilty to lesser charges, The District Attorney is given this power to select by the State, and that he exercises this power is documented by Mr. Greene's testimony. In the instant case, the petitioner argues that the tained element in Furman was Selectivity or discretion, and it mattered not just how the judge or jury made the selection, The problem was that che issue of life or death was too important to be left to this type of unfettered discretion by a judge or jury. Certainly if a judge, after hearing all the evidence ina capital trial, and after hearing pre- sentence reports from probation officers, and after hearing evidence and arguments from the State and from defense counsel on the issue of sentencing, is not competent to decide whether or not the death penalty or life imprison- ment should be imposed, then the District Attorney, who makes his decision or selection prior to trial and has not heard such trial evidence, probation officer's reports, or arguments of counsel, is far less qualified than a judge or jury to decide the issue of life or death, In fact, the District Attorney is the advocate for the State and is therefore less impartial than a judge or jury in making his decision. Since District Attorneys appear less qualified than judges to make such life or death decisions, and since Furman has decreed that it is violative of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to allow judges or jerics to make such decisions, it follows of necessity that the Fighth Amendment they were looking for (i.e, two rings); the police office rs knew that the defendant's wife knew that her husband was in custody charged with serious offenses; the officers knew that the defendant's wife had not been able to see the defendant since he had been arrested earlier that morning although she had been attempting to see him all day long; the officers knew that the defendant's wife was concerned over the defendant's situation. In light of this the officers began questioning the defendant's wife in a small interrogation room and almost immediately the defendant's wife became visib&J upset, both emotionally and physically. Under these facts and circumstances no wife could knowingly and voluntarily consent to any search of any manner. ‘+ was only after intensive questioning by two police officers followed by intensive crying by defendant's wife that she accompanied the officers and her mother to the trailer where she and her husband, the defendant, lived together as man and wife, Upon arriving at the trailer the defendant's wife turned over the two rings to the police officers and these rings were subsequently shown to have belonged to the victim. However, an unlawful search dues not become lawful by the discoveries which result from it. See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S, 643 (196 ), If the investigating officers felt they had probable cause to search the trailer of the defendant and his wife, they had more than ample opportunity to procwe a search warrant, The State has not shown and did not show that the consent of the defendant's wife was voluntary, and the burden of proving voluntarjacss by clear and convincing evidence is on the State, See Schneckloth vs, Bustamonte, # 412 U.S, 218 (1973). | 7 time and the defendant consented to go to the police department with the officers for questioning. It was at that time that Officer Harless of the Lenoir Police Department took the keys to the defendant's automobile and drove it to the Lenoir Police Department following Detective Bean and the defendant, No consent to the taking of this vehicle was given by the defendant or his wife. It is the contention of the Petitioner that the seizure of the vehicle was not incident to a lawful arrest in that it occurred several hours prior to the defendant being arrested. A search warrant was obtained later that afternoon and the vehicle was searched pursuant to that search warrant, however it is the contention of the petitioner that to allow the police to seize a vehicle without a search warrant and not incident to an arrest and then impound that vehicle until a search warrant is issued violates the terms of the United States Constitution, specifically the Fourth Amendment, This would mean that the police would be authorized in seizing any items from a persons car or home after the person had been taken to the police department for questioning and if the questioning resulted inthe police issuing arrest warrants then all that the police would need to do is to bring a citizen in for questioning, then search his car, person or house and then arrest that person based on information obtained during the questioning or during the search of the car, person or house, Obviously this is in conflict with Mapp vs. Ohio, 367 U.S. 43 (1961). UG h. There is appended to the petition a copy of the opinion of the North Carolina Supreme Court, State of North Carolina vs, Vernon Junior Woods, 286 N.C, 612, 213 S,E, 2d 214 (1975), Respectfully submitted this 11th day of July, 1975, Ar ee hu by Wl Bruce W. Vanderbloemen Attorney for Petitioner Professional Mall Building Lenoir, North Carolina 28645 Telephone. 4 758-2313 Jackson v, Alabama, 408 U.S, 938 (1972); Morales v, Texas, 408 U.S, 938 (1972); where the death penalty was mandatory unless the jury recommended mercy, Johnson v. Florida, 408 U.S, 939 (1972); Eaton v. Ohio, 408 U.S, 935 (1972); where the sentence was life unless the jury recommended death, Canaday v. Washington, 408 U.S, 940 (1972): where the defendant w.s sentenced to death by a judge following a plea of guilty, Alvarez v, Nebras:a, 408 U.S. 937 (1972); Fesmire v. Oklahoma, 408 U.S. 935 (1972); where the defendant waived jury trial and was tried and sentenced by a judge, Delgado v, Connecticut, 408 U.S. 940 (197.); Miller v, Maryland, 408 U.S. 934 (1972); where the jury could make a binding recommendation of death, but where a recommendation of mercy could be overridden by a judge, Seeney v, Delaware, 408 U.S, 939 (1972); Kelback v. Utah, 408 U.S. 935 (1972); and where the jury could make a binding recommendation of mercy, but where a recommendation of death could be overridden by a judge, Hurst v. Illinois, 408 U.S. 935 (1972); Strong v. Maryland, 408 U.S. 939 (1972). In none of these cases did the Court feel it necessary to examine the specific form of effect of the sentencing system which it declared invalid, Apparently, the constitutionally invalid element in these cases was that Discretion that a judge or a jury could exercise in deciding whether a defendant would receive a prison sentence of the death penalty. In the instant case, this petitioner urges the Court to consider that a form of discretion or selectivity still exists, The District Attorney in this case testified that in 1973, in his three-county district (Caldwell, Catawba and Burke), he had at least fifty (50) defendants indicted for first degree crimes, However, only about five (5) de- fondants were tried for capital cases in 1973, Certainty m violated whet he District Attorney mrmoke ' im decision, That he does make and has made numerou ‘ such decisions is amply documented in the testimony | Donald Green . The element of discretion has not been removed fron the system of justice. In one further respect, that i a person convicted to a capital offense and receiving a mandatory death sentence has one further avenue of appeal, that being to the Governor of North Carolina, The Governor has the discretion to commute death sentences to life imprisonment and to commute life imprisonment terms to a term of years so that the defendant would be eligible for parole after serving a portion of that term of years. In this way the Governor exercises the same type of discretion that a judge o jury exercised in Furman v, Georgia and the related Ps .] i the petitioner cases thereunder, The Governor has the opportunity to decide the very crucnl question of life or death an usually this decision is made on the basis of the informa- tion submitted to the Governor, What this means is that the defendant i indigent or who has no political ties what- ever 1s at a distinct disadvantage and is decidedly dis- criminated against. This also holds true for memb: of minority races, (ii) In further support of defendant's question (c)(ii), states the follow Ing: The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: "The right of the people to be «. cure in their persons , houses, papers, effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall ssuc, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly dese1 ibing the place to be 1 " searched, and the persons or things to be seized, The guarantee contained in the Fourth Amendm« nt, protecting the people against unreasonable searches and — | seizures, 18 implicat in the concept of due process contained in and made applicable to the States by the Fourtecnth Amendment. Ker v, State of California, 83 S Ct 1623, 374 U.S, 23, 10 L Ed 2d 726 (1963), The protection guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment is implemented primarily by the "exclusionary rule", the rule that evidence that has been illegally seized cannot be admitted in evidence, Terry vs, State of Ohio 88 S Ct 1868, 392 U.S. 1, 20 L Ed 889 (1968), This rule is also applicable to the States. Mapp vs. State of Ohio, 81 S Ct 1684, 367 U.S, 643, 6 L Ed 2d 1081 (1961). This "exclusionary rule" is statutory in North Carolina which is General Statute 15-27, 1 and provides: "No facts discovered or evidence obtained by reason of issuance of an illegal search warrant or without a legal search warrant in the course of any search, made under onditions requiring a search warrant, shall be competent as evidence in the trial of any action, " In the case before us, no search warrant was obtained and no effort was made to obtain a search warrant even though a Magistrate's office was directly across the street from the jail where the defendant was being held and also where the interrogation of the defendant's wife was conducted, There was no testimony that the officers even attempted to contact a magistrate, or in any manner prepare a search warrant, In the instant case the facts are as follows: The defendant's wife was confronted and surrounded by officers at the jail where her husband had been locked up on capital charges of kidnapping, rape and murder, The officers suggested to this young wife that if she did not turn over the rings, she would be involved in the matter as an accessory, In the instant case the defendant was in custody ; the police officers knew this; the police officers knew what ‘ it. must be made of a persoms For consent to be voluntary, own free will, without coercion, of harm or prosecution, or promise of reward or lemenc The petitioner cont nds that the State such fear, inteimidation ind coercio:. were not present in the mind of the wife of the defendant and that having fail d =) LA) LA) Ps to make such a showing, the "consent of the wife cannot be deemed voluntary under the the totality of all the circumstances. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra. In support of the question No, (c) (iv) the defendant contends that he was denied equal protection under th law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment of th United States Constitution. Constitutional law is applied differently to this defendant by reason of fact alleged offen occurred on August ll, 1973, rather than prior to State Vs. inducement by fear, threat has failed to show that ses ‘ Waddell, 282 N.C. 431, 194 SE 2d 19 (January 19, 1973), De- fendant was tried under the same statutory law as persons tried for capital crimes prior to January 19, 1973, "Accord- ing to the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Powell in Furman vs. Georgia, supra, 408 U.S. at p 417, 92 S.Ct 2726, 33 L Ed 2d 346, approximately six hundred individuals were in state and federal prisons, throughout the country, under sentence of death at the time Furman was decided, Many others, including six in North Carolina (one under two death sentences) had their death sentences reduced to life imprisonment just a short time earlier by virtue of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States vs, Jackson, 390 U.S, 570, 88 S Ct 1209, 20 L.Ed 2d 138. (other cases cited), Presently there are more than seventy persons who have received sentences of death in the State of North C_ rolina since January of 1973 when the Waddell decision was handed down. Equal protection of the laws is something more than an abstract right. It is a coimmand which the state must respect, the benefits of which every person may demand, Not the least merit of our constitutional system is that its safeguards extend to all - the least deserving as well as the most virtuous. Hill vs. Texas, 316 U.S, 400, 86 L Ed 1559, The defendant is subject to capital punishment in North Carolina, but life imprisonment would be the maximum punishment in the majority of the states, The North Carolina Supreme Court has in’ 2rpreted Furman vs. Georgia as holding the provisicn in statutes providing for capital punishment as unconstitutional in that such confers on juries to send one defendant to death and another to life imprisonment for the same crime committed under substantially similar circumstances, State vs. Waddell, supra. As set forth in the dissenting opinion of Waddell the highest courts of many states have construed Furman to abolish the death penalty under statutes similar to statutory law of North Carolina until such acts are amended by the legislative authority abolishing discretion, (iii) In support of the question No, (c) (v), the petitioner makes the following argument: The Fourth Amendment as applied to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees certain rights to persons to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures, In the instant case, as the defendant and his wife were driving their car, they were stopped by police officers who took the defendant to Police Headquarters, left the defendant's wife behind, and took their car to Head- quarters also, The officers had no arrest warrant; they had no search warrant, The defendant was told by Detective Bean of the Lenoir Police Department that he would like for him to come with him to the Lenoir Police Department to talk with him, The defendant was not placed under arrest at that ts * dn me & 4 ‘ Nee ; SO ee ce ee ane ~* ‘ a’ ¥ *?; Se em 4 ~Z - 4 . . - ‘ .- . ‘ . ao te BEST COPY AVAILABLE , s\ , . - . ~~ wo ee « ; Gab “* Pag ~ “+: ; ~~ .’* - ~~ «+ “~~ a ? “* ~e . . , ' — 2 — . ~~ ~_ sors te me - eee foagss FD Se © Lemme: ee” 0 os ors? er, tem ? 54S eee 6}? PSRVACARGA Ve 2OUwad an UICCageuw’ & Vacanne ass CAUAN Oa *. +. ’. eee ee ee £3, Yann,” Ledtce Ges WAS blun hem sete « (ue) ths desesaice . 7-5 & ® a ~ Md 7 a seca le? oa . . 7 a, M Onis Pia ddd Wid G: O18. SOS Q@ GSasVva.CS SeAvat&s Asi LONGI cm*®@%em 9% Om Pp Faw “A. 4. FP mee o%. 2,0) 46 woes pte eeg wa sen lepnee Ss meee pee = Po ® 0 a = Gas. 6£O “MAG.CNuatdIe 2aOk BOUS 2aVa Of Gres Orioles ste tehcnd esse toeeee ooh We od tn@! te — “ a « . - *- Reeprvcete «oe meen fone comme, & asie ~e Cm may %s C%~@ Yiu tielie OC Bh de ‘kent EVG MIN NG eS Pree $d C3at 33nt S$ aucc= ‘ - *.2°@ > = & Cn a ed Pon a. 9°S * Pace Ke fe - aes Ta. - be] tevVie ~~ = % wie Pep Sees ate & tia wts & Siadbdbiiao Gitihes Ga aT. cae dees SOO OTAn 225.5 omnia eel § ° -* ss 2% on Fue % ode ° [o ’ ae%~ | P chet + - e Moods SN A s2ltaenasd Bottlo of licnosr ia tie Giecsweard of goleacant’s aut ser0nvLIC. g at‘acs piace Of er loyront : F oo. : > =* 4. .- = oom . S| DN sqereace & Ya = - we o *q ¢ +e an eCinior.e ai mOUG Sad Geile dee eeGuoe Fertodd gGascnuds ad wLLce is . 2. - “ ~~ ~nawi tne » 2, © 4 ote i-- de § ° ee he 2 DESLiGS ACT, GOt oust, cpenod her Coor, aad ashkeod, “Mat VOUS 26.5552 -~ a 00 Few to - eFemmse 8 4s uw Ra, “Lon a ° Pe ee eee, * rr 0. Sad ERs POS L368 ¢€ ray pee Sa oy Caste wOe2ShiGers woaGh wal, & te . ?- «4% . won . . Py Peeries - - 7. - - ~- sors’, I troug.t you wors my wite,*® and Gxove sway. Meese Price was 6 me ee we mee! ~oD . *° . * © « » « - ~o tt. ae cee om fe mms mde o 4s - aie © ‘sae emanaes FG — “ne ean Dparwcu ec2z wae GeO Se en eS wen as we ON ae ee ae ee ee we ee 3 ot —— ° ws on te fom O° mame eens “emcete dec oe Jorp fe enle oo 4088 GUS eT 2 UWUL0 GIOUS Wes wnsd we ad en oa ee a0 Saiz esfc2desié pf Gm FP ew mem seen Ahn wnt Z Pamnn ne F Comm gemeam wt.mists tt camm (eets hawt Vow Saves Gis S600, O24 CSCSES ose i ene 2 Oe ee eee Pi - B - *.% on 9 = - Fad am e _ . . . e ° ae ‘7. ’ . . e we . peg ls fo ° . Gee @aoved %2Q VaCtace’S row weieSe Wee mewesiesees CUGee se lne . -. ° ee*e =, -~-— em ee ee eyte dere vat om tere "a ae FOS os ow ~~! V t— we 0224405 rae % - mma ce @ o.% & an . Oe eked be hewretde hi Ge Wee ~* 7° 33:5 | -¢ swe GBUCSrO246 b ae . . oe ee VCOwese *i ace &e% Yo wn S « ~ eee ao2 So? VIG Vacs on a youu : ee Te ee fo team fobuom % — et meet. tem Bart -- - oo *- ‘ an oe | sac eee wm se ee ee Oe ee ~—\ & od s ame YP am tm & roy. 0-1 a wea, @ oe | —— o? "2 . Gg Ps tare, hn | 60 ee leuuswe see GO cay vat Ons a.td Ponape a - * fee epmyers poms. m= ce OF no: cece " aw 2» Rs» %.%, ° ¢e ‘ Wors ees Ov ~GS veCad CESLY ANG On, wee AL 0 CF i es =~/ a . aa = & he dure & on | Pas) Canes* nm ese¢ eealdiofumn ats « “- - VR at. & a nd TT Parrers wee Tame ON Ae 2 [a ees: Sow et eee ae the 0 wce Sti ce ~ oe , -* « ek Li -~_- o- - . mee oc s- . . -_-— tcavew Jb &eltg OD Le @ete wnt te Beets aed oe dead OSL VO NA e Nene Ot ate te meee hy - . *®? . » * . i —— aes ~ . ~-—m woh ee ~emeorcd ‘ . ? oa : ’ . ee mee SMUG is wet Cad Wete tte J emtomtt ty ae ames : “ “+e + sem of “ ,.° =? 4. ee o.% ao ee * oan Yo 2 - b Comet ed tera deaitlisie Ges ‘0. &we Wesw ese SONTRS . Wreesedesll §)ad - ,e ° te’w ee code *. mee “mbe@ Pno Pa com fm Cc “T0 bmp « wes am 9 «Z oe £0." co mw “mee &% Ce ee ee ~@ © we wistlie hart woe eV Wan eet ae rd cise « °*.2,. © . ee = *. ° ‘ a . » @ —_—.s att eet mee mm Jt a | Goan ‘yy eee er . od w+ @ *# ws fev *.@+-« . o sa. ° . . Mw . °») . - . . . _—- . '« ‘e. * te 6 eh cet coke dee 2 d45:10°S0. > Pate Sears) > ~ +d) amare Mn . ° - 2 e e - - ¢ - , : : ° , 7039 B.c «a ® ‘ - - Or eng ttt * Fee © hee , «as 6A ‘~~ ee. *f @tte Sere Gree 66 eed @*ee w ebrecoeke V's o *e ase ‘wesc ameaehe _ wWele a SUAS SD sy bP wert tar | “a es ore comand oe er mwa’ ella wo? » o ~- Cah Wea AS was ‘ ns eae - ~ - oy ave ae? © Ps wey ~ ate s de “_ ~~ on 2S te pirre, Se er ene Si. of ® wae a ~~ 2%, GEE «| MA cCuweC ka rb Sxu SUC: 413 e oo te & Se ee - - 4.° - — bop a . - . . A a .s — . . . . wee ‘ - - “~- = r . - “+ - . ~~ - ~ - . > - ‘ ; ew selco * * - ‘ — + -— w ts ewes *“*« - — P oy ~~ " “* q vs ~-* sy ~ ° ’ ‘ ety “em bee ° ‘ 7 4 | -s+e~ . ~ * e? a? Se ae . wg wey bob een le _- ee - 4. nase ~ , eels & *. **s . -~-* rae s*-e . os ~ _ Aw ~ ete «se wv a +! ‘\a- sad ‘ ee v~« - ~ “es * oe ‘7 -_-* ~ - ade es . . we \ ¢ Je erent ee eee now \. ‘ ° © 9 «e+ - , - ° . - aad ese ‘ - * re ee ed | a o were some oy sine += . . - . _ oe . - =" ¢ en mm tee me —— - . ee a ae —e - C12 - ee é oreo a eae ob bute mw Oe _-e -* “y "nN cr i o-lU°:; . . —e ~~ ssewe ee ws? ‘+ ad settee hots Aly e+ o ~~ ee © P ° - ° re ~ & ° , ome *éwe be -e7 Viswy ~s tet @esg ome 10: nee ie , . . 4 ° - - - ° ~ « Pate) Se est @ KY wh ote te late &4 rie yet Pret oe Powe - @ see oo" @ “eg e-* .* ‘ me weet 4 — ~— we Jd tte ee tered .* ey ell Mem AnGwat m heen wm eee7 é ee . . 4s of, 008 & ove ? . , x ‘ , , oe « * . °° ° . ° we ra . _ee @ , d . Cee UCU RAV S IC Sed fade yg wetnmternten ov y Je*a ry nine s ° dead fe em*s Pe %s nS we - . a .* “3 ~~ ot e ° @ ——_—— ~~ oe oe — - o” oo e ge = . “/ : , . ; eati . i ? hr he ee a ~~? o* ~ ‘ - . 7 . a* -* Meee 2 € _-_- o~ * te sthe - - . 2» - 7 - “~—tuta -_ , otwerre vw ae ae) Ve at \e ae us . See CAV ake eek he er ure *; e .* %. ee en ee _* _ . se @ . . haes — we te me hee wee . it. 2 7 er Mia bee ue e © ele & - . , ~ o- ° ‘44 ~ - DO a. deme le ww mee ‘ One vs: ‘i ~o-y “6 ~ s 9 “ rp 6 wlimse an — . ~ ao9 ee We ee we ef wee es &e*s a %, ‘ weed a de® Fm, enone ~se re ~ee Sew toes ca a=, f oe a So meee * s. s-* fw 0 «+s - ** 4-14 eo” 4 tetameste Wow *- ‘ 7 “ A he 0 tee aor tese4 Pats ** - m/e heeece #. . i— - ' +e of hate weer o 2 . . 7 we oom Me , ~*e a ate . ‘ - 4 - . te a “+ ~--, 7 \Seeer . ~ ~ . a & « ~ 7 ee wee -. . ee’ - » , ‘ . ° weed’ Sh BON ae 8 o dete's+e Y ® se : ‘ . ‘ve *.* . ~ ° « . . . . . ‘ dn se 0 ra) & + tee ‘ eee . we hl twehe we Se “* — a-e * ‘ ve Ew - ‘ ‘ wea! 4 e¢ ‘ , ° ~ . NS ~~ ~_ ded . s+ . S . = al Wee ante Bt heet viene ta de . 3 . ~~ - oe - amare ed ; me . es yy > . Ae tm “tt « shew .¢ ‘a ® . - ‘ - . 4.9 + -« . ey wee’, wee — a - rv. -* ow he ow - ‘e meee ~ ‘ . * . - ‘ee — © “ZF ew hee we q - «cen -% es ¢ & 40h ~* a te * . — en - oo . 7 . - ‘ - *» ‘* CwuOGse VIS 44 Oke Rone - - es ° . “Tes : we) & a —* om le . - . . , ‘y # de ° SP SS ee OP ork BWP | ~“ * a6 “—- °° ‘4 os es . . - - oe we * ee & ; a. oy eteke 6 oeuee - . . - . o o- ~ 4wrte - . , YY, * wee 4 os --* »" @-".mMre * . ‘ Seae . . ° " . Mere osee* 4 ae -- ‘ . * se - 6 co «© ee a ott * . = S ~ ‘ ~* & @e ‘ * » oe o ,_* - od $3.2 4 , oc i ee Giaehied Pad - uw ; seee, 9% a - +‘ « . @-e 6 jos & ae a *- ‘- °°? - ho ot - . ‘ *,* as , ~ oe 84 we On wasn oe eaeter Nero ve a oe SA aw bene ae enue se 8 - _* J. - hm ote + —* &+ sXe . . ~% *- 24 « ‘ , ° @ Geis 4.4 4 * — ’ - $ . wees * Vou 4 ee / We Roce tore + 7 * aa - ‘ - ' ‘ a. - * ~ . - “= wae _ “~*~ amt . ‘ , - . . ” ° c . we ~7 / ww « . ? *~ =¢ 4 4 — ‘ se ( , a . ‘ a a° _—_ -e . a oot . — +” » . ‘ . . , ‘ ‘ -_—_——- — - — - . ‘ . ee ee +e & & —- . * . ‘7 ( -* — - ~“*? ~ . _ @ e ¢ me ee “+s — - ° ’ . ~'- os -- * eee . ‘ —* a ~ — ‘ . . . “~e ‘ " ~- situ ao? se —“——- . —s ~ ~*@ - e* - . + Sette so te & we 4 ‘ ‘_~ 4 a . . _- -- . » Se wes . . . . BS , * ? ~ a . rr w/as A . — Bb teed’ Ye as . *. . 7. p Ne ei twee 8 “ ee on te oe oe “ae *“'* r% de ——~ oO . —~ - ~ wos ore . bo ow aw bo ’ . . 4 —_— mete . ~ -- oo . ow Wo - ° o ‘ . - ~~ . — e tarZ _ ose . . . . oe 4 -« os “~ ‘~~ = “ - = - ‘ . « r + «@ ~* ‘ - - - - — . . -~ . * » ~~ . ' \~* * - « . - — ooo See + + & . +4 tne ’ ~*4 . . . . *, ‘ . cob sot sede eet - ° "4 . : ? oi' ‘ —— de we mre ~toens “ in = a. Coe Ce GCG. ° . 4 - —* _ Me . . - 4 wee - ‘ ‘* 4 - —— ° *.* ~- - —— - - Ne we 4 . + sss? Cc ce -- “+e o- terry ~“-- ~ - “ sue aoe . - 7 ** - - «e- . -—-\e te«t- v7 “a “ee . . . were teed Wee th Gince gy to Fie ctsvee 0%, ‘ : * ’ . “8 — oo” oc wu we ° - \- . s —+s = , e teo« . . —T “ ‘« » = ‘ -* , ~* ~ ‘- -+e . - - te Aver . 7° - o +" . - ~te . . . - . ‘ . . = 7 God ’ . 2 . - . a . he wee ose \e , \ oo . “ - ~ « a’? = ~_ : i ° * « ‘ heme ade aon +t a - - ~ bets tow ‘ “* wert Y ‘ - . — i i i . ‘. « ao. ew — wKise % . ‘ ee -* - . ~ , , diee’'s be cw beod os ade - - ° ‘ Liew . ‘ , ‘ é 0.’ ow we . _ we . ¢ -—s ~ eee . * of ° o *-* a ° . “~-* \e 4 !> >» of e ’ . ° «© L «© ; ot ty be > , S¢ anes ' ° . , ©. os ~—-a9- 2 . * .? - — \ -f@ ide “+e . . «2 te @o+s jp wetne © of . -* - ° . . - - ’ . . a - S * * ~~? ‘.caee ‘ ‘ ‘ so tual . e~- » . wee \ e . e - ‘ *. ae ve ae ‘ io “- - . , . ‘ - -* , ‘ - ~e , - ~ t= ‘ . _- -e . = — ‘ . . - Z ° ° ws a , , rs us | . . “te co - ‘ea * “- . - . - ° 2 > aid se " e . , - - 2 bd . » . - . . . ~-* . - _ . A Pane - - . . “* . . ~ ~~ ** * . t- ** .- wee « . . - — - *- ‘., ws ote “- . , i ow “ot wee * - eae - » ‘ ° . . ~ . mde ° - - . . - . nee -* . - cfs am, . oe tw -~ + ew .~ wee mie ._- .~ ~- fae . -* ~ -% +4 li tere . - - P e %-« . . - . - . - yp fe. tree F ‘ “v V/~ wee oe ee we cee ee _———~ « “* «- ~ : ' - - - sJe @ - P . .- “* 4 © =e _- nd th » wos? we —— ~-s wees Bei wees . se «4 a o- _-- -* ” = , . . 4 . , * a thes | . = . “++ hme oe Semen lr ee ere ane eee ee Ne ee _—s- a” - J “- - ~ @ Wet Feue's we wo @ ° . . --* ee - ne . - - ° . “— oe @ wen wm 08 ° ° . 6 ON ee me he ee -—— “ “* — Se te ewe OOM tee ree \- nae at | ce - -* - ° wt ‘+ e Cee owe - ’ , ~~ «6 ~— ~~ en ee ete wees lee ba re me ~ =o a i thom & . ” . . , . . a -* e ~- . - e , 7.% = ec, ” hed we hee “yy ~~ *~- --« --——— ov “*« ee + 4 wwe ee Se ke we ee ee +? “* - ° . A , - ~ fe we , - ‘?’ - . . _ - o ~ a & a \-.. et eee “— — Fame amet soe er i ne a - a « - " . . ’ —T » +a “ ; “es ‘ _ @ 64 — . + = - - ~*« t~ we ue ~* . © ume ~/ ~ a - ; a ° = © a ‘ ‘ a ‘- — “— = -~ «% . ~ . ‘0 of - 4 . . - “ oe ~ ot « - — e ‘ es en ee ons ~* ° ° “ee & tee bios -@ . @ +» . e - Pa . ee ““¢ - “~—- . a thee » & e@ — . es . . = ‘ cotue eee . . «= ~ - . ; 9 “se td p.* - ‘ e . s- . an ‘ . ‘ . - + . . « . . . / s- ‘ 4 oe” - - * , . . -? 4 - . 3 “ . . ~ = +. . - ‘ . - - ° e é e Fd - . née Gases Gd 4 a . © - . 2 « . ~ - . . - . . . 5 ¢ . . ‘ 7" - rt. a . , 5 - ot. * ee ¥ ‘ ‘ , ‘ . ' - “-* - -* owe wt tthe ‘ ‘a wee 4s / = ooh 8 — ° é . « . 7 @.* ©* & + - ° 5 . * oe” ma rete § nye . rv. ~~ -~ -— we weet ‘fe ' - Vit vente’ O48 a ae ee | , - -. ete | -* 0.6 w « ‘ ° © a ’ ~~. ‘* ‘ a . . ve +e , -- . wera teme “ se %s - ‘ “7 « .™~ tery mens - - ~ ‘so . Se Pee ‘4 , at’ i we ete a af “SD Ty eo 6 } ime ‘ ’ ‘s o*e at i ’ . ; ‘ ‘ . ef « . ‘ee . e* . = ‘ . . . . . ‘ ; e o.° . ~ wae e S £ - , . - ~* . “+e « - ° . “ 4 -—“ — Tn 45 : - ; - , - ue a Age es .*e & wtese , ra ’ . ga -/ ‘2 ; . i %e e a” . * bs ‘ . ° . “-* . . ol . - . e- epte e e ’ «© * stb te bitten - #8 Nb cect Fone’ y rr 2 ted °- @rtewe o 6 Gedece os * a'@ %hideste « . ¥ * o-a* , ' °a S : 9 °. =m Ff 2e ° ene . adorn “00 oe m+e- — -, -y ~ — ° _ ° =~ ** so 1% 7. . . -~- . ‘ee ** @e . * ** . . 4 ® fe é oy Ae * s47e / pe theres . tee é-* o 4 gem 2 %ek Pun eet nee men” %o?_ mm be te *“s con a Fer ace .~ — “ Seed @ ~- - tA.e ee ee? ee 2) ae teste = «* . bw ee. Cmte td mem tori = oe we abe marr vw « - -- ~* * Se ‘ - es ee OB! a - , és puedo lt escmreroe a F ota me onl e4 — « u 4 (ee, pocee . - Wa —=—- 4 . ee + a Ce. wea *¥ ww toed se se Be & Oi \4 eA feo, — - -_*- i es aa. - ce i di toa ei | —_— - ° ~ : 4.9 9 of - ote ters 6 2 dei esd ~ “~- ¢ of“ ‘ oy : po - Oe 4 ~ - ~ — « we **« Steet ae ee fv ctowe seg ~~v ~@er’e —-—'~ 4% +e“ liande “ — . - . . - ? - *. , ~~ a om pee _~ , f . a - ‘ ower eaee * 7 @ 7 4 te ‘« ———E "Va - - ” | i Tr , ane _ ™ ti "ee oe thats Cee te tee Batol bib r wie . . Sn - 3 . > ‘ - od . a - i a i | we we geet ei mm et ree ed - - ° . . . -- eo” sy - -? ‘ +e 4m — . “ . ~* os »* “*- ~-_, 64 ota 'o w ole Bot weil TA wel sewers Be wet ett wee em eet ds me m& hemes ng r % ££ “ P ° o = - ma* ~ "= ¢ " a 2” coos & i oe . . tt ew er «tam VA ee ae -s#e@ ——~y o> +e we meeaie bd we 6A wati* ‘2.8 oa ‘ ee | ~ me ¢~ a F a? © anu - gut Jom 2 mma ee - “+e ~—— + hew dt a ae he tm hee mae y ee eee Pd s2é o m ~- = on, 4n%e gy Sm eo mue Fama d oo = _- . - 7 om — ore 66 wee mem weer tren Wee ee eee) en ee Went herd ‘ee - P - 9° ~-* . ° ° a 4 ~~ . -% “- oe ~ « © ew? a of ° a Cnn ee ow a oe !’ Gi Ph , ve oe «. o- ony =~ ad . ~- es — ‘ o4 ore @ oe ', . tits oote «@ a . ‘ , ‘ "mse « eS . we S te - a 7 ae °~ mie @ pwoce:+.es? “= 488% mn - - : Je*a a’ ¢.° a , . *. - *. - ee « «* . Oe Q8e «@ pb te NF here 8 aes - - ee ae . oat? APst ew a eee 6h 2% . - _ - . . . “+ + “~+* ’ r ‘ . s:6@ =? ° oe . e.+e - - = sels oe) 4s ‘+ - ‘ . re | &e eeu ots ss wo &4s ees Os ae - , as . ~ . w+ tere « . ho me spas 1 . ‘e gue : ° oveo€ «+0 ee onyee ewes Ya p 448A ° . “te . w*. %s . seS*~@ +f’ «+ $@ «te lee wo , t oe ° se s - ‘ «tube eee lm ee eV - . © . . ‘- . - , "4 i 6% as - > : f. % @, $ ++ , - Pe - 404 pace qo oo é 4 > on » oe 2 sew & a> .* ie Reeet wets n eh dems? mee —? © ~te ~&s + tere oo oe We we We ow le & tether e ee ss © wt met ine e or. : — as — “Ae ee . “yey 2h - . . a eee eee ‘e a ae 7 44 we V We've wif 7 -~- ++@ «+e ae aere ane oe i fF Ae ae N+ pee ’ . ee ae - iMeaoate On nat ow deeo's J de 2 “4 ef ewwve ~Vily € a + “44 woes | ae te be ao *o8 wie sue we he wed ‘ * « es ~ ° . . Ss on _— : . _* C . ~ “on al ae te ae ro ws beste -_ oe Seatac fowls eee 4Oe abe Seve lLriece o~ weeny a | e e e OS OPPS SS Oar es Oe Fe" . os o- — * os , ° ° > ae . - « ° a- os a8 2 a Wese 9 , a . cal wm os -e ise ee ee iid td hth an ee ee 2 ee on bee det im eee a eo he eT ™ . > * += - . P ‘«- ° Ps . on Jo ay PP 98 » ¢ of, fe - - ae ee ee en ee ee ee re | ~~, ew *Oh4 bee ee tep ton be eee . ~ he «6 an Cor%e . © . or é a ~ veal .* e ee F .- rut - --- ’ = ee *. cores ote ae 2 . rr "= evs ere 3 ns | wh. be 0b wort ae del: as Gee Cie d wo i wr wee * _ ee +e / ~* Pum aw 0 bam ss 08 ole / om etn twee ‘ ‘ e _ > . . , — * os * es - . Pox tn? a . ° ® sot = nn ~ are ees ‘ . ° . ; , € Sa a mas . & ses ~ o a Be bo ee « Se se awe ws «6S Cl —— OP Senet tt Orie 6 echo edema Ow OO. A2aars Ions one ° v a ee * - * eo ‘ ‘ a4 ° ° « . - ’ cc Wine tonetatel o ee Soe x ae eee ve - ‘ : « - . ~s*e+ tee ee ar we te oe Ne ee . -* wi ee ~ we we me . “4 We - eet ee we eo? des - t . presen wide 3 q-% = Jeane’ " ~~ a on 7 -~ sete e see = i - ( ; oly | 4 4 .. 3 ; A \/ ° i a a - —_ e. o*, f - “+. s - ** ‘ , * i . , . ** ) ’ ‘* 4 > > 7 c - aa . i oe g - . é ' = . . ; 4 - ‘ ‘ ‘ a | > i‘. J° Fedde ce ~'eenlh - te ~ Awe. - - y _ — , “ees *% -“* . * * - ** e*ee* - 4.3 . - - 1 Oo wm belt) ‘ . “* ,* 7 . Saer'ew « © wo te eo P . - ‘ Peet “ . . P . . “fr “+ ww .ea 3 . . . . 7 J ~~ « tow oe “- J. eels Siew wits Fa re , ts bon '- — . — me ww ti wd a Se “aA oe ~ = “~ -* i J -~—sS« a oe «* . al 7 tee er ow >. oe ee °'y . a 7 oo" ee ee . e oc om} = . “ew ~** . ‘ ‘ hee oe tue . vs - . - 5 ** . ‘ . : d Se ae . af ~ ’ / ~ ‘ * . ‘ ' ‘ ‘ . ’ . , ,* -- A. ; ‘ ° ? ‘ ‘ . * ** = Z oe ° _ = .? ae * ©)* ‘ a thral-e lily .? - aie 6 _ on s - ».?% 9 A cc meee a "1 4 ° ° . om “*ems*ee . — ‘e's © S's «oe el, eek - + eee “ «=. es. +a" ed « eer Liew & - . . * — p. . te —“— - 6 oa Rhee . ' 9 4 4 ~* “-* - , Sa ~- +e ” 2 . Ou % - * ° a arene +f ~-* se 4 . . . e"e ‘ . ‘ . . ~ . * . . . * M ee * ° rr) . +e | ? ‘ = 0 * -* os > & “* . #- ‘ os? J* 8 atiew * * — . . 4 Seo" . . . - 5 ~ ey , at ae .- oo . , o é . - . . ** ed * Se ° “-* . *. , * — - * - . fe -+- ~ “* - - .“ . in “a ‘- ar com % 2° . - = #9 CC * @ & J ort arte Qe ‘4 . . @%-« - a) - ° . - “+: we “4 ee oe e« + . . . * . _ > _* - - ~ - __- - - - sae _= d os a - - . “ Pel QO oo eee. ee ee, ee ser? ane e ee ~ “-we* : ee 'SH bo eevee 74 & @“e se . oo cel ° —_ ® °c ~@ ane om *\) oo . . ee a £4 y “4 ;? "oe, # . Gacole & . oe we tet .. é mer*, or ee 6 & we. He ° ° J @:@e'@ Btlercd ov 6 wo ss@+ 6 ~ meoft an T.°2% «0 fammted M2 ..9 mre ° » ge te -e*s my meee fem om we! oe awe se ‘ pw 9 eerce 6? & cho ewe 0+ be 8 Fe eo > | we « Weens e- etre esesie weet . o - . . 2 © «6248 oo . - os . ~« an - > . > ms , oars . . o e , wee “es ? .. my 7 7SCr ¢ o a ¥ te - Coc O'dedodd Wastes oe or weee tee . te ao Jets 6+ @ . totes es Osteo 03 . . es — - e **. eee | » @€ = $ . 7 we e®%- 1 . ae fee th - sme iw eve eee Keene ~~ ~~? 8.°%, . ? Se & oe meet Te aye pire Fe bee ton Ona ~~ ee die _ sa *eanm 4." le Eloi . a@ £9 2 ~se* * 2 arse re dim ? = _- 26 aw tc’ Sance*s week to Rol ewes ee) ee oe ee ee ee ee ee ee ere 2 res ee ee ee aw —~—¢ . _ ° . oe ted * > ® 2.8 , le a oo a ~ « Se a _ ‘ o ereeto « ~- oye i tome § sat dae Rew ee ne Re kee ts ww on on “wa i. e-.. te ane ~ “7° ~ 7.9 . -. nr A I: 7 \ere ee y ek : ° Z t, / -/ee we J ‘ Jsad te dite to he + Ne oe J “ ~ ‘ewe > 7 - ‘ . ~ - ~~ ~~. 4? ‘ ~ = eA ae Pa" - fo am f..* Pony ef «+: MF « oe ae f.%y «o Be - -—- ofe Fm mame hen twee ’ 7) 4 wwe ~ +e 'e io ome te tes 4s ee ee ee ee ee ne ee ee os . . . . » @ #2 -« - » > - ’ - fer, - o = © on 6 fesac~o,%e! mre ~~ a® £2°%.4 e 40 - ree te mm Femme . ‘ ’ - ‘eg ww ° , we te 86 oo . on * . . s ae WV P See - e% ‘ - *- . = * , of * ° . 5 ? ‘ ¢ ‘ . » a0 B62 Of & ps 3 bao @ 4 " "dull ~* o f * , . . . . . . . - . o . «a4 wee om * a . oe @ t.0 de te in > oo oe " Ne es +. . *. . . ‘ ; . — . vi] ‘ - o . "+ « ? . 54 " ; ay - _ . . . . . . "e om. * te @.00 ‘ «+ Qe ee ey mse 4 ite . ° . ‘ os. 4 eo 2 nt setcail . * am Rae ete ‘ - ++ eee Ct eet - ~ se 6 e-+@ Lice a | aS tee . - . . . - . se ._ - ~~ . .. . ¢ ° . : +e w- * eee? « e e o es > > eae at? Jes ee wet i wae | S 6u3 Vai er tae - ~ - » oe -“_-. ° “- . *. Y «my ov one 4.7 ems e epree & 4 = ‘ 4 —— te - - oe | ee ee ee ee i tt ne Ct a Le --s +e eotee % «9 ° -- ~ “+ . - - ed -~* * es . Foo on he -—* " ie “44 seme’ Oo Pete fetes w ee We we 6 ~~ lee owe Slew we & ote ee ob ‘ . : artece"s qc eee ot te Es ~ °° a 4 « -s op 2% 4 ¢ - ? « oo wtte@m Leen es COA+-0d ahem 8 we Fe te ae wd oe — -“ - we *s : ¢ [§$a «a? sna fms o~nae a a Se ae ee ‘ ‘ , . 3 * tele of Sedecte we SIM we twketot is 6 ts SveS eam Seed G6 eietis! "Gg dhotGea ke . . - " eS ww ° ~ = - “ - « . *. ws “+. © ‘ - anmmite f oo *e'e a@a.* 406% ~ * “eo on | on “- _ P ° — = ® 2 2 es _ — ai - ‘ eo. . . Pod @ al | . ane ‘ “ton we ~- : “+ ~~ oo“ . . 3 - . - = ee m *® « ~'s +? ee q . ° . * ? e+ @s6 ° . P _ , ° ® « q . ‘ “s+. , . “ ‘ ‘ » % . ° . . . . . : see * - ° * . ‘ . oe o* . +. . e . ee . . ° . ° . ied - é . . ~—¢ e . «© . - © «+e . ‘« - . . . - ° . ° ° e a or Soccw -08. te coed P ° . * e* - . “+e ‘ . . . - . . - . > 1 Cane *.e8 « ¢ ‘ . . - _* - _— »* ” + em tee (we here — . fr. » . of occ eo ~~ oa “2 S ae wr. 2 say? 7 e~--" tee - ‘ meee ‘/- ye a C~ = - © -~ee & *. of te. - *--—- - *& oe ee. — .. —a" Ss. ? ; _ - e 2¢ - 7 —_ ° of. i tt + be ene i‘-* teh a oe ee Sheree . a mts ~ Oe Sew e «6 ose - - - - +e - ° «,"@ ee . m eae * ° o-* e¢ ‘ - 2 ~:° ‘ 2 ~ % » &9 - @ Omer e . th San . - . ‘ -— « . ‘* —- “* -~* “- ° . ** . --* a tee . - - ‘es 4e- : ’ ° -- Ps f+ . . . . +. ee ee =~ . - dees & P ee o- tom «+6 * ae Be ae'e “*, +. -« oe Wee «. ~ . * ‘- - --« * - e . . ~ P ° 5 - + - ‘ ‘ ¢ +e — P e+e to%e ~ --* 4 te 4 G oe a * - * as a ~ . . ° . . ‘ we - P ~ . * os . -, . - . ~~? - . ‘ ~* - * . + tw. 06 Oo & ‘ -* . r - 4 « . — , . ® a 9 _ * 2. . ~* - oe -* ee 8 gee ‘« . “eee Ve , a ee 66 Gece .é # + ° o o% - ¢* - = « * “mae a tw ia * ~ *“«* 4 - . ¢ . eo *e Zz ee ¢ © © . s So ' . “* , . *. “#* s* or, * , ‘ . . ‘« .s ‘* G@ *ta - - °2 ° - 7 s Le . ¢ .« ° » ad : 4 »* . ° . ‘ -°« . . P . . . - ‘y -* ‘© « . . 4 . os o* ¥. «e ve “* é . . . ° . .* y* 4 . . P ",* . ~ 7 - é ‘ . oe a . - —~« «& tee —s+* ee - a ° » © oa eve ~ — Qa oes Ss me we «te tiem ~ . 7. be a - ° ~ . “-~*e - ‘ Sess ‘ . . @ ee " ‘ a el¢ me wie we ‘* ‘ f ~ o . * + - ‘es ~ # ee ** —— . , . . . ° . ’ . ~ “ é ~* im « ~s4 - ~** - * — , oil .. . . _ . *J7 ‘ - - i —s - . . ‘ ‘© = . ot ‘ , ES Aneta «ss0m Pimee d8e mm Pxemyp * ee ee Oe ok © a We atte —~ ° eo = - . os . ‘* . . . ~*~ ~es- Ore cette ewe oe C ote bea CV bees re a —_—_— * ° . en oe ee = . * sa ° se de — . Bw eer rhe me ety eect te 62 BV ela wectsra “8% Wiéo ee as Cwriivs ais. Uno Ps . meee €* fe ~ - ee beun oe as ee . fee, — ae et Free v asl QLOous ar fase. teopagy, © Se fee st emasese ~ Ba * - ee mee Reis COAT od - cot ames Ce ee YJeoetv se Cr Sf me ? 2 rv oe « = « *, gn fan 2 une om 7 ; Pe eae. as - * -, me we ew eet ee tebe £4 oe Ve iitmeoteg salen Vv yo ee pee eae ee 2, ee ee ee a Sa 2 fee) «Ft “@e ae ” * . ** . “ve —/- _o- ** See ee weer eel we we be a4 -_-? ‘oe ° . o*e * ~ . _ ° ew wraedere lowe en en ee o *s tant 2 ce tessa M Bee delice, TU Br. wom tT ele ee neem inn .t 8 we et ee me wm we ke 1m wee tree te eee ao tee te mee eee wid Ne sme VU me ew tue be C’;. ee ee ee e - J ‘ . ° ° ° ° § — - ~s ° rs GT Sen femme eee? o . * ‘ adores meq oe yeoae'e & uo 42 ‘ fe*. L.-- ce me Be ON ees Newer ee tle witehtee Streeter et sh tases be! GbOw ce ot Nee ten’ 0. eet * c ®iae”* te* 3.7, mMaeds ana og? * en mw an >» oa oe oe oa)? . mse iP oe Crwst ow CoS Be eh She Bt ae tteeetow Wmme ote werd Wide eee te wile vs. cote Ome rcdeed dU Wee eas bt se 8A BP oa sd) aed ciliata ® PF*. was — % dic ot ae --* were ewe SO Swee — Sew tbswce tm Orbe trercetehe crewidiccnta seen k--+6 beeoce en ee eee ae fee mene ew eww a Ce Wars thine mee re .. a od . - * . 7" a . . >. @ -_* - ~ 4 wet. « a ° - P . . _ ° —° ° . ? - t. wee tose - * . G54". 98 © @e. } wee we ° 9%, wenn AOA se mm Ty naa Ve ¢ ++ aPee Xe @ oo we on or “wey et Be fet mommy . is) eae Vey eee, § Het wo 3S A384 & epews, «de o Re wen nced Somes brecdstc.a « “see ' . ° * = +. o - 9 ¢ --* ote y + bate dad Caawn co tome Gi] SoelaOGy? SO ew.t Kec at. ee ee ae = na ae a =e ewe tea cr S Pe Ola rw ees ms ae . a 2» . - ; sere er fed adoe mea F. vcqued OF 4 me wren ee L © meme wens wa GncaO ein ce Ceo fe 8 . hina a : Sas mn me oe "| £m o a0 Os. Oatet weso on! whe wie “ee “* -~ . . Se ... -_-% , . . C * + Sena , me a be . “~ ~ “ee - -* oy ae ~ OOM Ta Vahiete Cet. oF om oh AS OF ote te he Oe ed wee 36.) - * Awe .- ,¢ . ~~ “ee cm- v0 “~ hn? Bi» “9 ° - ~ - . 2 - +* c= eye te? 28 ° a Me 4 - - =o © ease Le oes Wee? wee de'she tone ew C8 wee kuch ‘-— ~ eee * - ° ° . . . . e es ° ¢ s*s . _ .- . “* * %e * - *- - . . . t+ eed * *~ * ~ . ‘ ‘5 - e+e woe 6 "P @. ‘ Feed ve - +e ws ‘o @ *-@e'« Se we b wre ed + es ov “7 Ores was'e .6 ~ 9 ‘ o, © w=» : =" e . °. & - . . é-"e m — a c ee to Se a Oc, t%-% 2%. ~~ we oe cae ‘ sew oe ee &: -' . - -* -« *. . a - ° . 4 > ad . . - eee ty fs : ¢ @ 21 ott et > . . ° ~ 7 * . , ; ose iets 2 ‘ ’ + % te » - | , . * * . -* . . . . . . —= ‘ ‘ ’ " s al of . soe es 8. Ge “4 ° — a of, ‘ - "see . — Bin — a . . e. -* ‘- . @ , .- a’ sew = ¢¢, ~“« . _ * ‘ ° c*.8 . : - - ss . . tee ‘« re oe ee *¢ “? P) of te @ Nee Ve aa i © me ee ae ne me . ve —— =» — 4 aT - : Pitas OO a fs uf “t er ees lan Se ee a 7 tadste sstieels. OK XY “as — . ° 7 . -“ - . ‘ ae ° . ~ « o- ‘ — = _ o~ Qe we 26 . ten wehermor's - 74 ’ ail a a ee . é « +s she a oe fe meet? « +e nie Ps a , . ‘ - . ; Geng - . " 7 “4 Ne - P — de> eo aes ce SS eediswto beter Lea av woh As! Qe actos a ee ae a) — te " - - : ‘ - . - « J « ne ‘5 —_- = ~“ * ss. 9 4+-% «0 - t*e0 * o. _. ae 4 e ‘ « ° _ ¢ "a » od - “? : ° , - owe e oss we Met aie ww... Smerine any ~~ 7 er ae O eetstelse Wd ee 4. Ge "eum Lod eek ss: cet whe : . 5 @ os - P - “a we fee . ‘ mew fats o- - . , . ome _ > de 7 “f-* «+s meses | shaw ve we ek te Oe ed de ae te! Oe wee ate i ee ee a 4 wee ow dow WG Nesete Varta @ f « ” » no 7. o e » . ‘ ° « . ce o-aue : ° ~ ?. egmcen “» ~- es . ~ ssp se? cc . dk ee oe ee sare ee er teen Semeee be NoterKe we tomstoke Ole eae Casi Rime bale e Ss whe ee te . a - ’ £904 as ° 7 — — a .* — i Te aS Awe wee smrimewet dele g erie wees We CV uscd eon) oe oe setae Se we - Oe pm eae ~~ Mr eere 4 SY J te ae ee ee aos Pees oe dsnn g Saeaee of's eve eet uw 4 * ee gy P Segoe en% f2 S « é oe F g. . = cea. . f . me , ; »oe - ~ Vv — am ee ee ee ae ee a . i tt he ) ee a Or eee ee Vee aw V ue awes rt ow ‘- » * i Bie | - ee mH teedbe -_ ‘* °- tts =46 iL . *-* - ¢@ - eC, : ia hr. ae cee Fan -Z tees 7 ~ & * a ne | ‘~~ ont we s é BUS ; } eI -~ ) . . — w/e * See “ . . “* — ‘ ~ bars -cesettae daker fee) ‘+ * . . . 2 2 — —T . wo . “«*e . ‘ eis A ? e& 6 oo * ss ° * p . x ee * «6 oe ew) ‘ wis a. . ’ . , 9. ane . ye 2 . -—4 elias ~~ wh bine @ met . om _ 2°35 = . e 5 | —_ “ec, e 2 al oe as , ° Pome a & - Hay Fo 9 oes 3 whe rere tes Stee aes on oo ). eal ae a 4410 ~% a 1%. 3." of _ * 4°. a © gctn de 7 Se% pa eae wets pe Midd. 2309 Siow t.36 0D a vais ov e3 Wane a2) ce Wee Ox. it ono om S fF Bn o. : ad «4 J —— mm Se . . . 4 EVewesrses 66 SSS to 2ts sémissi: ve “Vm ( . .’ fen oo meee ~—— ov Sew Met) sce sa ons «sem ee te mmerde pe odes an de ’ e% ie ee ee : D2 fentuat oet:: —- Ci SIS Gciiate ‘aeaie COCs Se osha 4a oee ¢ © © aos , of ewe ges TP = _ - . iu moede d . er a ied Pole -e.- ad = Sete” rote Wie wees i6e@ see SCA io t Tea tes a4 SPogi2dlag Mavetiiia We ry 7 am a “~—se 6 cot =, + m-- el “eo “ae P . o- ee a Pa tee S53 socews COnwaves enter hte tee 16S Die - wets CONuUSC eI Sf ésdece Py *°, * +6 awa Py weet 22 « ao roti t te “Vee nar . se FOaSCS g oa tox pp Re | Coscudeas & sor wsaes ~~ va wKXs 60 trae tate ox Ue - we woe. ae -- ern. Ol pr. am ee v- joe et ed . “- # ee ---* So >exrs Pare era f “=. ve -- ——— ne ee 7 are o) oz — mented cf? a I nts toe -¢ ee ee me ee ee cues VECClin's Gross, his osicz . mene te me && Leactias cones mAemee yy - . 2 - 3 oo* . . ’ “ee, at we we. eau $34806 in t3.3 3c Fw Sey wee ol ccc a> aed te SVxOLSS PF beeen au . . P wa - —- de +32 mee’ ava ns Gf *. marae °°. es - . : one ba Cee Rens co Soanee wate eo oz me a ee es ll gy o-oo * wee bee tela _— necne oo fa em A%, J ee2208 *.. cage com Me . ax* « ‘ nea wee mts 320 ; eer SOnVESE Cos eas elie ee Set Fry we Cio leases -. so . fs - *~ 2 uw de%e « Pope ae, me” as Sma Po? om & fo"s BE%a a com oo - ay a ee ~-« oe sowed’ ug wale Conse ep Fb | Voom eet bbid Ss Suu aia 1c tote eG. Gal ete ao2e% - ~. oe de*- 4 for ae FZ ¢ i 85 Se mmntes oS a Peta n. # & te ¢ Ce sa Jk Cor. 2 naw + Meee 2 V2C tans A &S inwele tite ; ore ob pee wr 4 Gee “ + & WV oe a SB és we *. ad “ane ae er et Ne eee - +. - . rr erred ‘teat Coe ao ort vt nee ‘_- een wen ~+t me tbe’ 3 baw hee ew ham te eee te a Gi25 - tema fs a es GCaetesee Ga eeCeaC ayeod pe | - . * . . — = eacrne- dan ¢ - ' . on a. 4 » - . Ga CsS"c: :-. mae aemloeey @iwcet& el .g wate oot,’ 4 - anttsre3r : = aa ton & SOW Conc as Tm ooo cel asm * weet weamssc ow 0s ‘@ tocssealdse’s Beer wees Pt ee . > Peer o7 thc oF Gece ces? ce ° ¢ ee . +* . - e-« --, m a edo me oan Ose oes oe laa € ca% « S.cete de «ga oe*n oe, te . ° oe toe a ee | “ee ew pd hl i | tem | 6 tee Vas Shade) ? Oe i be hn 244 te » T¥: @teuw, eOeVON — - as * ° oss ~ e ‘ an 2 pres 2 tum qeee + ccs nw ~~ ? fee oT te o +m, theme, - i: oo eee ft wen im Geese thaD Cue t2 Reve! eee years) Ge ws +82 owe Reeehe oo ots MEALS ? we Queso eo “ ~ we 7 +e "de 4 “- ed ys 4 - vos * . ofcqsce ? * ° *? FF wm mee we coos tte les enrete ate tetas € ‘es & of tte ee ee ee = CoV oc Gade Gonsd ete woote ks fo “- “* -* “a mm, 7, Le “sFeehepg Sesame ememis mews * 2 OM weer woerees 04S Gi Ge esd twowmerwe S Gee 00S COTS hos Pan . - d«a . 27 a - . oF dad a ?o* OP 4a mo er *- ** fom tt ese hese we lem tinte ete |b. . 2 -. —~ 0 wh cate om imme s* *. e de ye © Sef wos Pee . eo hod * @der*ss Se ed i ee te tee @® - ° bd - © ’ o°e gs * “7 . * - 4 “7 Ss a ae -_* eel ae me ¢@e «© ee ee oe ee a | ‘ oh Bee tree eee Fk i en SR’ ee feet wc oat. we er a ° ° . ° -- . . ee . “* . ae te 7 ~e e- “see ~ 7 - Gore J ‘ — a © © wee Geb adh as cue 6 tea & bias “- é. * -*@ Cs wilad pe el = big *- ose" -e08 Su 20 Cr iota am « pear all * ~~» & Olea man ° . . - 7 1) ¢ #66 oe oe dt «00st woe Sse a 7 Gas eis &é «6s & bees tole ste" + 66 2 & _ ¢ . er oe + 25 0 oe «= p>. ms 7? - -* . ° 9 - - - ks seer" @ 4° s* ely ome me ° wee . -- at at Thaebtes hee tee: . . ° - * P o. “ -™ P a ° ° é és . . *« ove Ny 4 . Cred e6 ‘a ety ent ry e® « e eo! «? va Bie a e oo re a fe ps " . a » 2 Fie ate gomts.ge 2% 0 ’ * 7 ~- . * .. oece@ - tment ete sti e+ « ‘ . s *e . . . atte. eee * o te ,. ote ate ow Ne . . Gece ~~ ~~ - See -t& — = a: oe -t & _« - _- “~~ ‘ewe ‘ x - mo Suess 6+ @ ~~ s —_—- se . “ts rr ee eee ts . her eee he wwe _'- - . . ee ee ee ee o.* - Se se nt +e maces® %.. p00 . - — oe wm hee is \.- -_—_ gtawr i . - Pos oo Se wf. - “7 Rede nn te Lesa ‘3 are . . *,. . ee a he «Se ws re ° . ary -* + - 2 dis 31©@ ese 12GS cO » _ " a - or se an eee @ _ ee ee +g aA sa nro. 5 re” - epee | a J wosiat tt wel @ te Ve aw een) @ - -— “-" - de*%e, a on é c ef “2m me e+ ee ee —ss oto --é\- — &d % te nineow an = ~~ wee ee ee eee) “ ~ . . . . oe ad + - _ . 4. ea een - a ee tee. ose" Ww odo m- 6 - . ‘ ‘ S. ae —- & — . © we - . al ° a e ® d . id » - * _ —— S 2 o & = ne . ~* “** oem off ad ** . ~~ = Se ss - . -- . o *. . 4 , one . . ~ - % . s« +. - ° 6 + a - - -* . * ~ - . . . . - . . Sen . . - . ~ © em . “ee -- ~~ = . . . -- ~*e~— «@ = or We te Te) om eer) 2, Goce ; ‘ Seow -- - 2 * . 4 —-e “oo > P = . ~ - ‘ as - Se o 6 ‘ » 2 . . . s -~ . ° ™ F _- » ? ; . ‘ - . ~ ‘ e © . «> ‘ , CG eaeeuscs ~ eo we ve ; .. . i ‘ . a 4 . +? ° “- ~ n ™ ™ o - ° ~* . —~ am Cf --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385003_2049%3A1. Public record. Not legal advice.