# Petition — State Board of Elections of Illinois v. Communist Party of Illinois > Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more. URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385003_1105%3A1 ## Record - **Collection:** Supreme Court brief - **Document type:** Petition - **Published:** January 1, 1975 - **Citation:** 423 U.S. 986 ## Text tm THE sacl 95 1975 Supreme Court of the dakesicex | Octosea Term, 1975 _ “85-474 | STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS FOR THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, and MICHAEL L. LAVELLE, DON- ALD W. ADAMS, FRANKLIN W. LUNDING JR. and WILLIAM L. HARRIS, individually and as members of the State Board of Elections, Petitioners, vs. COMMUNIST PARTY OF ILLINOIS, ISHMAEL FLORY, LORRAINE ASHBY, JOHN LUMPKIN, ' JAY SCHAFFNER, VALERIE WITZKOWSKIT; and THEODORE PEARSON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Respondents. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General of Illinois, 160 North LaSalle, Chicago, Illinois, Attorney for Petitioners. Herpert Lee CapLan, Assistant Attorney General, 312/793-3587 Of Counsel. SALE, OS ATG EERO CLES RT. oN ce Se coe Printed by Authority of the State of Lilinois <> vor INDEX PaGE Opinion Below ........--s+seereeerersesesererrtts 2 Jurindiction ......--cs-cccccececcccccsecccoccscees 2 Questions Presented ....... oh Lis Nea ameeNene a8 2 Statute Involved ........---eeeeecereerrerteeeecee 3 Statement of the Case ......-----eeceeeerrerterteee 6 Reasons for Granting the Writ ....------++-sereeeee 8 Th: decision below is unsupported by evidence in the record and misconstrues the reach of Supreme Court Decisions. The decision below involves important questions of federal law which have not been but should be de- cided by this Court. Conclusion .......ceececcccccrcccccccessccsccseses 20 Certificate of Service ........+eeceeeerereeseeerees 22 Appendix: A. Opinion of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Al B. Opinion and Order of the District Court ...... Bl C. Opinion of Earlier Related Three Judge Court.. Cl D. Summary of Vote in November 5, 1974 General Wlection .....cc ccc ccc scc cece ccvcccscenceses D1 E. Summary of Vote in November 7, 1972 General Wea... occ cc ccc cesccccsssoseucnecesesees El TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES: Abate v. Mundt, 403 U.S. 183, 186, 91 S. Ct. 1904, 1907 (1971) .....2cscercceesececencecseeceseneees 13 ii. American Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S. 767, 781- 782, 94 S. Ct. 1296, 1306 (1974) ................... 13 Baird v. Davoren, 346 F. Supp. 515 (Mass. 1972) .... ll See Buckley v. Valeo, —— Fed. 2nd ——, (D.C.C. Ses Ge BOT BD cv dn cevncdcdnkaveabbnn kde 18 Carroll v. President and Commissioners of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 178-179, 89 S. Ct. 347, 350, 351 ( ASesedkshspaataceavencidkecisic tee 12 Communist Party v. Austin, 362 F. Supp. 27, 30 (E.D. Ws ND ondcaeccrceett cL Ue ee. 13 Communist Party v. Ogilvie, 357 F. Supp. 105 (N.D. Se MS éxksubckskdcedenkiscGc suet 11 Dusch v. Davis, 387 U.S. 112, 117, 87 S. Ct. 1554, 1556 SEND Ssus0 deeeekgnsecusd enamine 16 Gaffney v. Cummins, 412 U.S. 735, 93 S. Ct. 2321, 2325, Se ee CED osicbatelikcecstlcn oS 13 Jenness v. Fortson, 403 U.S. 481, 442, 91 S. Ct. 1970, OME EEE ninedidedstGceideruuy sie eee 18 MacDougall v. Green, 80 F. Supp. 725, aff’d. 335 U.S. 281, 285, 286, 69 S. Ct. 1 (1948) ................. 9 Moore v. Ogilvie, 293 F. Supp. 411, 394 U.S. 814, 89 S. CR, BE MOD so av hcneectvastechsns 9,10, 11, 12, 16, 20 Reynolds v. Sims, 300 U.S. 533, 578, 84 S. Ct. 1362, RI NI Pe ae ae et a 13 Socialist Labor Party v. Rhodes, 318 F. Supp. 1262, 1269 (S.D. Ohio 1970), app. dis. 406 U.S. 583, 588, 92 OS. TR, SP CO. kkc. ic ete cs... STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS FOR THE STATE OF ILLI- NOIS, and MICHAEL E. LA- VELLE, DONALD W. ADAMS, FRANKLIN J. LUNDING, JR., and WILLIAM L. HARRIS, indi- vidually and as members of the State Board of Elections, Defendants. j ORDER 1. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction de- claring the ‘‘signature distribution requirement” contained in Section 10-2 of the Illinois Election Code, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, Chap. 46, Sec. 10-2, unconstitutional is hereby granted. The Court finds that the ‘‘signature distribution B2 requirement’’ constitutes an arbitrary formula which grants one group greater voting strength than another and discriminates against voters of the most populous county of the state in favor of voters in the less populous counties. Communist Party of Illinois v. Ogilvie, 357 F. Supp. 105 (N.D. Ill. 1972). See also Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 (1969). The statutory provision challenged here offends the one man, one vote principle that is the basis of our representative form of government and accordingly the requirement must be struck down as violative of the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 2. Defendants’ motion to convene a three-judge court is hereby denied. The Court finds no necessity to convene a three-judge panel as the claim that the statute is not unconstitutional is wholly without merit in light of a prior decision by a three-judge panel of this Court declaring this same statutory provision unconstitutional in Commu- nist Party v. Ogilvie, supra, and other decisions declaring similar signature distribution requirements unconstitution- al. Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 (1968) ; Socialist Work- ers Party v. Hare, 304 F. Supp. 534 (E.D. Mich. 1969) ; Baird v. Davoren, 346 F. Supp. 515 (D. Mass. 1972); So- cialist Labor Party v. Rhodes, 318 F. Supp. 1262 (S.D. Ohio 1970); Soctalist Workers Party v. Rockefeller, 314 I. Supp. 984 (S.D. N.Y. 1970). WILLIAM J. LYNCH, Judge, United States District Court. Dated: September 11, 1974. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Having declared the county distribution signature re- quirement of Section 10-2 of Illinois Revised Statutes, B3 Ch. 46, Sec. 10-2 (1973) unconstitutional as violative of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States by order of this Court, dated September 11, 1974, it is hereby ordered that defendants, their agents, and employees certify to the county clerk of each county in Illinois the plaintiff candidates as duly nominated candi- dates for election to state office in the general election to be held on November 5, 1974, if the only grounds for non- certification is failure to comply with the county distri- bution signature requirement. WILLIAM J. LYNCH, Judge, United States District Court. Dated: September 11, 1974: Cl APPENDIX C The COMMUNIST PARTY OF ILLINOIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD B. OGILVIE et al., Defendants. No. 72 C 915 United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. Sept. 21, 1972 Before CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge, and MAROVITZ and McMILLEN, District Judges. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PER CURIAM. This cause came on to be heard on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and the court having considered the complaint, the affidavits provided by plaintiffs and documents in opposition thereto, and having heard argu- ment in open court, this court states as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Plaintiffs are the Communist Party of Illinois, its candidates for public office for the election to be held on November 7, 1972 and the Reverend Wil- liam E. Hogan, an Illinois voter suing on his own behalf and on behalf of other Illinois voters who wish to vote for candidates of the Communist Party of Illinois in the November 1972 election. —s C2 2. Defendants are Richard B. Ogilvie, individually and as Governor of the State of Illinois; John W. Lewis, individually and as Secretary of State of the State of Illinois; William J. Scott, individually and as Attorney General of the State of Illinois ; Michael J. Howlett, individually and as Auditor of Public Accounts; Alan J. Dixon, individually and as State Treasurer of the State of Illinois; James Roman, individually and as Chairman of the State Central Committee of the Democrat c Party of Illinois; Victor Smith, individually aud as Chair- man of the State Central Committee of the Repub- lican Party of Illinois. Together they compose the State Electoral Board of the State of Illinois. . On or about January 31, 1972, plaintiff Communist Party of Illinois, in order to form itself as a new political party throughout Illinois, nominated plaintiff candidates to seek election in the 1972 general election and printed and distributed new political party petitions to gather the requisite number of signatures, . As of August 3, 1972, plaintiffs and their agents collected a total of 33,027 signatures, of which 26,735 were by voters residing in Cook County (a county containing slightly more than one-half the registered voters in the state of Illinois) and 6,292 were by voters residing outside of Cook County (containing slightly less than one-half of all the registered voters in the State of Illinois.) - On August 3, 1972, plaintiffs tendered their peti- tions to the Index Division of the Office of the Sec- retary of State and their tender was refused pur- suant to a letter from Don Ed, Supervisor of the Index Division stating inter alia: Upon scanning the petition, it appears to meet with statutory re- quirements with the following exception: the peti- tion was not accompanied with the so-called loyalty oaths for state offices as provided in section 7-10.1 of the Illinois Election Code. Therefore, the peti- tion was not accepted for filing. 10. 11. 03 On August 8, 1972, the defendants were ordered by the Honorable Hubert L. Will to receive the peti- tions nunc pro tunc as of August 3, 1972. The peti- tions were tendered and received pursuant to that order. On August 12, 1972, a challenge was filed to the Communist Party of Illinois new party petitions on grounds that ihey were not accompanied by loyalty oaths. On September 6, 1972, a meeting of the Electoral Board was convened and sustained the objection to the validity of the petitions on ground that no loyalty oath had been filed. On September 7, 1972, the Electoral Board recon- vened and voted to deny certification of the Com- munist Party as a new political party so that its candidates would. not be placed on the ballot. It based its ruling on the failure of the candidates of the Communist Party to sign loyalty oaths as re- quired by Ch. 46, § 7-10.1, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971 and failure to comply with the county signature re- quirement of Ch. 46, § 10-2, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 2201, 2202, 2281 and 2284 and Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The loyalty oath requirement provided for by Ch. 46, § 7-10.1 and 10-5 is invalid in that: a. It is vague and overbroad on its face and there- fore unconstitutional under the First and Four- teenth Amendm nuts to the United States Con- stitution; See Livingston v. Ogilvie, 43 Ill. 2d 9, 250 N.E. 2d 138 (1969) (identical oath for candi- dates to the Illinois Constitutional Convention of 1969 held unconstitutional); Krehbiel v. Board of Education, 309 F. Supp. 630 (N.D. Ill. 1969) (three-judge court) (similar oath for Ili- 04 nois teachers held up2nstitutional) ; Connell v. Higginbotham, 305 ¥. Supp. 445 (M.D. Fla. 1969) affirmed in part, reversed in part, 403 U.S. 207, 91 S. Ct. 1772, 29 L. Ed. 2d 418; So- cialist Workers Party v. Attorney General, 345 F. Supp. 1132 (S.D. Texas 1972). See also Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11, 86 S. Ct. 1238, 16 L. Ed. 2d 321 (1966) ; Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 87 S. Ct. 675, 17 L. Ed. 2d 629 (1967); Whitehill v. Elkins, 389 U.S. 54, 88 S. Ct. 184, 19 L. Ed. 2d 228 (1967). Cole v. Richardson, 405 U.S. 676, 92 S. Ct. 1332, 31 L. Ed. 2d 593 (1972). b. The affirmation of citizenship of the United States and the State of Illinois being the only constitutionally valid portion of the oath as it now reads, no substantial purpose would be servel by salvaging that portion of the oath alone in view of the fact that Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 46, § 10-5(3) requires a statement of candi- dacy that contains an implicit affirmation of citizensmp. See Livingston v. Ogilvie, supra (Ill. Sup. Ct made no attempt to salvage identi- cal oath). In addition the practicalities of the situation militate against serving any portion of the oath since forcing the candidates of the petitioning party to sign an oath containing only the permissible clause, i.e. the affirmation of citizenship would involye delay where it cannot be justly tolerated in view of the im- minence of the election. Once the election is over the state has ample opportunity to enact a permissible oath and invalidation of the whole oath in this instance will not determine any state interest in having some form of oath in the interim. 12. The County signature requirement of Ch. 46, § 10-2, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, permitting no more than 13,000 signatures of qualified voters from any one county C5 to be counted toward the total of 25,000 which are a prerequisite for recognition as a new political party, is a denial of equal protection guaranteed to voters by the Fourteenth Amendment in that it discriminates against voters of the most populous county of the state in favor of voters in the less populous counties. See Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814, 89 S. Ct. 1493, 23 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1969) (broader county-wide signature requirement in Illinois held unconstitutional) ; Socialist Labor Party v. Rhodes, 318 F. Supp. 1262, 1272 (S.D. Ohio 1970) ; Socialist Workers Party v. Hare, 304 F. Supp. 534, 536 (E.D. Mich. 1969) ; Baird v. Davoren, 346 F. Supp. 515 (D. Mass. 1972). 13. Unless this court restrains the enforcement and implementation of the aforementioned unconstitu- tional statutory provisions, the plaintiffs will suffer serious and irreparable injury in that they will be prevented from qualifying for recognition as a new political party and will be deprived of a place on the ballot in the November 7, 1972 general elec- tion without adequate remedy at law. It is therefore ordered, that defendants, their agents, servants, employees and attorneys and all persons in active concert and participation with them shall immediately certi- fy plaintiffs Communist Party of Illinois as a new political party and immediately certify plaintiff candidates to all of the Illinois county clerks to be placed on the ballot in time for the November 7, 1972 general election. NOTE: In view of the fact that the printing of Illinois bal- lots for the November 7, 1972 election has been held up pending decision of this case and considering the very short period remaining before that elec- tion, this Court has not included a written Opinion so that the expeditious entry of the appropriate re- lief may be facilitated. C6 MecMILLEN, District Judge (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from Conclusions of Law 11(a), 12 and 13, and the preliminary injunction entered in the above case. The loyalty oath required for statewide candidates in TIli- nois as I read it, complies substantially with the require- ments of Cole v. Richardson, 405 U.S. 676, 92 S. Ct. 1332, 31 L. Ed. 2d 593 (April 8, 1972) and is permissible under these circumstances. It reads: ES OE Sr ane ees do swear that I am a citi- zen of the United States and the State of Mlinois, that I am not affiliated directly or indirectly with any com- munist organization or any communist front organiza- tion, or any foreign political agency, party, organiza- tion or government which advocates the overthrow of constitutional government by force or other means not permitted under the Constitution of the United States or the constitution of this State; that I do not directly or indirectly teach or advocate the overthrow of the government of the United States or of this State or any unlawful change in the form of the governments thereof by force or any unlawful means. (1971, Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter 46, § 7-10.1] Although this oath is not phrased or punctuated as pre- cisely as we might prefer, its purport is clear enough and it should be construed to be constitutionally valid if possible. The extent that the Illinois version may go beyond the language specifically approved by the United States Su- preme Court is a matter of semantics, not a matter of sub- stance. As I understand the defendants’ position, the oath is not required for candidates whose oath is prescribed by the Federal Constitution. Furthermore, I believe that some geographical distribu- tion of signatories on petitions is justified before a political / D1 C7 APPENDIX D party is entitled to participate in a state-wide election. The oy distribution required by the Illinois statute is a reasonable 38 one, fulfilling the legislature’s apparent desire not to saddle the citizens of the entire state with unjustified ex- penses, complexity of issues, and burdens on election judges. Giving voters outside of Cook County some voice in this 42 determination conforms with, rather than violates, the prin- 8) ciples of one-man one-vote recognized by the majority of the Supreme Court in Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814, 89 S. Ct. i= =gs" gga SeSasgaaa== 1493, 23 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1969). 33 - 4a Seeee6 088 © 6 6 a pene 86866 6 & 4 > we Se > ee et he See ee6e48es 6&6 & & eee ne © ee 6 6 & Plurality 726,612 842,216 ene Se 6 & 6 6S RreeyewetsetterEe FS sf \*s-eseeeeeeees Bee 8€Bseztueeii = BAF? FRB BR Eee 'S.e2n8 866 686 8 4 'é&en & ©.6 & 6 & & «4 > Sao é¢ 6&6 & 6 6 6s ®eses-s eee eereeese [oe 6 6 &.8 & & & & eu eee @# £8 @& 6S oer ee eeeeeee See eeeeed&s 6 a BeRESBEERE Pe kz *e@eeseeeseseeeees BQOQwtgeagazswtetnesa Pe ee eee eeeedt ee 86€ 6646 6 6 6 & oe nawe@e#sé6es6&es BeiskrtretitiTss. Sa, etriFavTrinw? "eS eeee¢s26868 66 6s [ee eceea8e &£ 8 ea ea tenes 6s & & 6s eee © 2 8 6 8 6 6 Ss BALERS Baaugerts ILLINOIS GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 1974 SUMMARY OF GENERAL VOTE territrey sy Ge ete + © © © © © © © © © 7 enweewes sees & eeeeeeeese eee > @ 2 £2 66 6 6 4 2 @ 7 ©2686 @ 6 & OG a BOs 2a eR EBRL > ew eeesen £Beee 2. 26 6s 6 © 82 es @ 286648 6¢ 62 6 & ene eseee 6 6% 2 «6 _omwm £e eee ss @ = eweewes 66 @ a 2. e668 & 6 6 & 6 & 7 28 €£@ee 6 8 @ 6 @ @ JSR ePrPye aR Pe eS BSH ewWweweere et fF een oe ee ee eS eco 2 8s 6 6 ss & a By}; gmeyerd? FF een 6 4 *“* © @ Office, Party and Candidate UNITED STATES SENATOR D3 Hy ""35 One NgAeM awe sogon ““REF CRQOt- Omege gn £ #8 ii HE °a5° meow RRYe~ “none s-gr* -" 523 egveo ©2R2R 2" 5 a8 fa] |R8a8% gg895 S985 S535 B5E85 S48a8 EEREA REESE Hg \a |38 “s 8S 24°Q-- SKota soann ange x7 z 2g ju] |S8885 Sg258 gaeay agaae sazeg azecs esase caeag ag |e |c2 z- gv NOM BOGN= H-gHis agana owns 2- : £2 "Bage ERGAS RQRGE “R9GE ERGRE a=fag gezee seeee 23 | leg al aww “~*~ 4 =a =a es 6e oe. ae Te. 6 @ Lin. ee = YY Ff. 2 *oeees “_* fe @ «@ - - --e e *eeee “ee #© «@ 8.886 6 _- sa & . be. 2.2 yess Sf 8 oe seeds / +-. 6's sé os Plurality is computed from the Democratic and Republican votes. D2 VOTE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR— NOVEMBER 5, 1974 (HES YAM 23 iF i Qrwr- Omo-a Cconna q--s" NQOOM SKK ON KETO COKBN VeK—Ng Qoere “FEN agree 7 ik HE Sare" cvenyg eraeg greg= HOOVa M—NeT CB-Ar NEE ge =o-e S2eacs “r=egsy Rene” 5 o 4 o oa 2 w= = fi ER5RG SSHES THRFR RASSE SSRES AaEEE SIEKR SRSRE ASSES RRSSE RSSER ABSER on-an ec A-e AMANO _— agen-a MAAE— AGHA —CON— CANNY NIK ee ATOR NNN 4.) |SSRE# GHBE ROREE REDE agueE gage SERGE aEany ESEOR Eazty SSGEC FoauR ,|EES*# Ge%3e ROGRE GaRGS TERE GRREE GERDA TRLRE SERER ERAGE ORAS 35888 i SE00@G 809000 80000 28000 2e@0e0 2e000 20000 C8e@00 C2OGea@e@ A2e£000 Ceaeaea C0000 “-* sas ** _ S . a Se Lawrence eee Livingston ....... DD oeseeeeee Macon ... 2. 2 ef Workers Communist Democratic Party . Party Alan Lorraine ja Suzanne M. Counties Plurality Dixon Haig Ashby Ss 00 cited vedee - = ~ - po gece omen 2°" —— we re-~-e2 “egg ananna mango 4 . E : e a ix} s2°ce eri ="2* 3 nes" 37° ween eran maoge i ag°5° cones ances g=23° =ge"n s"-ge2e° =sR2° veose F a a i ju5 gaere a aeSSE g°=gs Sgoee =°3cs Z225° =k28° RARER Epa i aaa tt Ree=F = wie eres" Soy@woe *geer R — iain R°SBs Zone 239°" easse ener ager’ -—nnAan m-="" wesar — — Oe oe — =n A°Sze epune =2R3°e°° e=257 Fre" gaere -eene 2-3°" ross 7 a - n —_ on~- wo s°s3a2 eZee s3=°e7- e-=s33° MIO eon 2-7 men 3-3°" 7 9SeS ” 7 = — or) = R°S"S SARYS CALKR SRSv’ oCSg_= eHSRS Bgese Cm ena Brose" AHS RESIS BRRBF LEIMG BAe" LS_Ar MALRA SHIRT We=AR Seg_e= argEgs _ nN = SSMS KOLAR SNE FSW Suggs “=2K° SESH —v~res Zrerr erases RSGa ¥SZER RAGA SERRE RBA=E LARER BREGS SAGER RFELZ 29259 MANN NM AEE HK NENTS NMNINN NINN AMHR wgrcin - & 6 a 2 . ee a © es © @ ao i me oe “_* # * * vyaax ko 2 ae i; a oe ‘2. 2 & © a > i 2 = ake El APPENDIX E NOVEMBER 7, 1972 SUMMARY OF GENERAL VOTE St erTr ,o oe 2 @ a. s 2. ez Se ee. € BR, Pe 7 a a . @ 2 6 2 ert? “er wT .o == = Fak ky Bae. Srark. [a 2 3 a yh Be = a 2S “re @ “re # * a - 7 = ole “ee # «© * oe. 2 “ — ”“ 5 a ee 7 ARE 2 : 33 5 egorn "=ASe 3° g | inf essen "RSS 3” a 28 ; if ozAse RETF 3° s te i jul gees =ASgR:z° 3 88 %|=A fo] |S8588 s8888 28/8/36 ta ah MOONS a? a $F jo} |aeaee atagg 93|e les -x hi 20s Hees ghke 5898 genes e885 SESE feras z a ecncco- annoeor mance Aan Cn - an -~ - we) 5 «| SF |#¥aas RERSR SSCGS FICS AIARE FURST 399R5 F3aH8 = S| a = . S| iigupy|SHSe! SSS8E SSEME SSES AqNSS nuge encue catns és - 9 — 2 |$8298 B858 Bases ate S288 Sagas F8NR2 ASSES 8 i - & SOeZeo f£Ooeronx 2a000 6000 S@22@68@0 of000 aroes cocaca ee @ & *“e* © @ * eae & Fa estWekterre Ss Fert meeaeer FS 2 @esty weees Sz ££ 2 Bere ee oa eee ae ee } ar ee oe ee aee 2 eee s ae Sf hans ©. 2 = a = “* * @ * 7 7TeteoerlUlUlCsmUMPwmUC TO FTF )hU6h?Rhm CRB RCSGcCtlc( 88282080 S22 8322 j8S 824237 82-32 2 @& © nanan ne nnn n ns bfnneee. 2a gseoeeesee Beeeeae + B22 Badges s cen est nen ese ara as Ue alc tli OO )h 6ULRmlC a ee | «£ hUv Se S| h6eCU ee 2 US i S & g ge | } & & Bee 2 £ Ck lhe lm6hlUrrhlUrhlUcrhlhlUrUrrhlUrrhUrlhlUmrlUe ee ele sehlUmvrelCce Other Write-Ins | Write-Ins Governor and Lt Governor ane ener ae lee) nnn ae fF Bae Fis = & ee ee, eee Bent. ©. i bene i@I-s ee Oop oane - © B22. 2 ee oe Tanne) h (6a lc(i rt rr rh ULUMmlmULvLrrmae aes. ff aa fees | aaa. ofa #esnseenc cae s84 2 ¢ 32 ff 82 Fe 22 & Tana lrre aa lc lh OOOO OOS h6U6vVRC ee SS | 6SlhlLUmeRUlC a eelCUC RUC Se Sa aee ene. hl OO OOO et anna 0h O6-lUlUOOC OOO O|h[U6UVLhUahUre he > 2 Beet | 5 & Ae pes et Bek ££ oe eel lel oelmKehlUcvher Ur CU Write-Ins €&eo* Ce © © + Ce fe © F ae et Oe eS eee ee hUmhhlUmlUehlULhSlLhChCc Cee lL Cc ae ee eas ee eed .lLUlUUTllllClCLUee hl la ae ee ona wan lh |= lc rmrhmhmhU nes wRaneete fF sees FF. 62 2 © eee en na l.!lU CUCU elLUCLTrrL ae ee © fe eae & Se ee ee 0 eee me Dee ee | Ue ee UU ee ee ee eee © eeeee oc|e- ic Auman ge eanear = :7 @ sesrg © goes : - soe 2° a .@ ss R2z°s~ -A-@7n --“g- 2° Communist Per Cent 2 2B 1 2 1.361 3.231 4.592 -coo-“ Co-=-08 Sooo coense o-oos sesoeoes -oE-" OFM SF =H ONS eneco =—=——. == ss VSS elUC TCT eelhCUCU Lh OT weer eee eeeee eeonee = Be be > De > Be > be > PB > > > * Be PP Be pee Pe F igan 4.781 20.015 3.1m 4.176 3.359 550 452 S34 48.073 766 52.566 5.811 857 46 2.371.303 - —Lenn seen Tener aranmn onl ve BE SSREA RVESS SR) RS ke pee te Bie be bo be be BP ba > db > BD b> Db Pb > BD. - > > BD > > > BP PO Ph BP per Br er PP eee Pe he Aw dee b Bile Db 4 be be Bie > bee Pe > Be Db be BR P6 > FO | = ae ff ae Ll Pe he OP Re be he pe pe Republican Richard B. and James D. Nowlan 4 4 3 sO 10 “0 7 1.214 ! Plurality + Ogiivie baad 695 a2 303 7 33 22 170 644 2m 644 66S 21.917 99.411 77.404 DOoeee eeero Oeeee £e000 Creer Coors £eoes £5000 COSre «xocexx5 OCeaexe xeoeec Of) «eos -nene wewenene seeeee s8e82enee steeee &eeeeyry Feet e Fea ees anaes Urea naae Beeweten wFensaene se322 228 829 se 232-2 FFF FS cook Benes Beeee Beeene Behe C8242 S288 22 +53: :F—lClClClClClClCUOUUlUlUUCC~C~C~C~C~C~C”C Sl Ll eee 2 a eee eee eee eee ee eee ££ eee Pe eee ee ee se = =6=©£©—e EE SRE ee ee Yo = a ee [oases Beene Beets Beene @Caeenen 222885 822382 22332 27332 °:5 3} zx = EE eS lh Oe B Baeeaen Sees S22. Beene Beaeee BEB Se Beeee weeee Sees Bees ¢33ee- i éeFMm = oan -& 2 &£&'e a [27e2.2 Beraene Se nee B8220 5 2eaaeer 22882 2th 6h8lceSs SCS ese et EFtllhlcC OlCrhMt~C~COC. CC ORS OU RR. Ee eee 2 eee “_* © *@ * @22 ik wetet a 8 reece n Bert ee Seen Bases Bebeen oS2eenee eee ee 2°39 8*¢+R fm 2 2 0 BBR 0 0 USS i Counties -eRneep esa eee 886 828 @8B8028808 88283282979 SRR? FREI BIV_sAS -Reaonunnke ese eenBp BSeSBeene #8 ees es#e2ee02e8ke8 828822 BF etzee Bae) See eek eee Se) eee ee eke ee eee ee Se eS ee ee ae ee re Ps fel le eS Ue a a Plurality is from the Republican and Democratic votes. Commies Convtal tae Ogilvie. Mr. Nowlan. 47: Mr. Walker. Mr. Hartigan. 55 SEED ciisepuicas>onareerant S SaRE 73% ice a S fifi: Liisi fo oper he i esis e§ $3 §$ Sti $i: Pfiti giiit Piit: BE on © cccee cane eceonce cee © Gaea ‘Sane we eece- eooene ecee- egee- © coe =eee eeeee =e2e e-ene Secee E mne-rm en-en -eeee cere co--e © ume me-ee cocac Menem CO-=me coeoen me =-cee eNeee =Ne=m EN-ece NMerRe anee s E/* . Feene Hi 2|55 | 333a3 Shaan Gasca Seen RaaRe Susea SueHs RESS GSkaR SRMRE SARRH RABSR SHAAR GHSHH AASKS Bosse Sadan RERRB i ¢ 23 R8S52 E=EL% SHARE ElGHz RENEE ESRRE 28H35 : 2 = ZONE EAGRE H2GEE HSSES RSESR FRAGT SETHE PESTS SESE = ERS i! SSeG8 CSgle Baha> ESSE FUSER FUEKE BRSTR HRUzS SSGKE ERERS 42555 SSE SSSSS SAAT SGSSS PSIES Ggca= OF Met teh ec MC ee ee Ce ee eee ee la oe) Ra ee © ek ae Eee ae Pr eee ee oe east oer eee a *eee+ee “eee * aa oe 2 ee .-e vera e*ees °® sane ©e-e a . oe. . @ (se Beeéee ener 8 2 & se &@ 8S 42886689 Tze aeanae BeBe ae BSaneeas SBaeaeee S282 22°82 S278 t2etecelUlc ( (‘“‘iO™OCSOCO;;CéCrCFrUTC™C~C”C”C GC ME RC .|h6U6DRDUcU UR RC lLCUmrRrCUCUCUC a elhlUCUrrhlUcvhhUlc Cc rl elhUmrhmlUmv UCU Ua elhLUCUmrrclUcv al Ol a)telhUCUrermlc el ee et tlhCUr rh hmv Ue ehUrh UL a eS [ceo aeons Bees 2s £2222 £2252 Beene £asee i } gf 2” £¢ ieee 20 ees 2280288 Seep ee SESS SF FRRSE £SEEZE F2Rae [aanee Beene SBeneee Seen sees £242 25s eee esl COC DLU™~™~™CRC RM A A ORR Bete tees URS UES UCB tS hUv EET UGC TBE GS sane BEB aee 6S EES eee hUe eae hUrhLh eee h6mSe eee eS hUreercee etl tC FhlhlhUlCc i ititit:::””””C«CLUC~;~;:;:;:;:;w;«;«;«*”*”:CRCGEC HC OCR REE heeeaeaeaeelUC CUCU all tl elUCUmlc a8 raza BEZee BeBe n SB2aeae S22 822 sSt282F Bete ese etecelUlUlti‘it~™~™~C~CMC;:;C‘(COCOC(;(CSNNOC;”;”;C;CPCSUCORCSR_ OR 6OSBSB BBS Beene (tn Bee te 2425.92 4 ew me -— 06@6@60Uttt~—“‘“‘s™SO™OSOSCRlllllll gm ie ee = Rats aa e Fret ee ee 6c [ease et 880646 8 8 oO: © Qe 0 £2 Fr lhlUM Oe os el! le Ulu lh lel Fl ear el a UF ee e“eeee Pea nae sae eee. 28282 (aa. aan =!) ee eC Se lLULULUlUlUlUUwUwtwUwUw~C~CRRRRRlllUlUUlUlUlUlUlUlUlUlldlU UCUG6§DUEGCTC ES SR aa eS ese sa ste ecvs F?Fr?reF,7Ee Ff FFF? FEE . Opts ww. 4s i + § &§ ey i + 3 eel Oe « © >; lie A kl lhl elUrlhlUlh a en ee 2 OP VOTE FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL—NOVEMBER 7, 1972 2 a a .sa 2c e222 822 @ a “ee ee eeeee 88288209035 ornate s9 2 2) aww ne senate weeene weeaeaertrae senen = eu © €@82 22 Banwnan Baaenee Beene & ra nannf sftp a > a -eeenesesevue#s& ae | Coe . > . * pee n S&B Obese O*eewpese O88 24 coenens. Sees «Eee Bees | 6hU6cSCceaes Ure es hCUcA eee luce tcl (Wl)lrlrlrlr”r”r”:C(“(“a = « sense eee es 82. = ones. Se ean ase 8 2 Beene BPs apeaet ££) Bee & FV Counties ese ee 889897 289 Beee? 822222 Bertre 2a eknae pe eee eees8 86844684 enn = Tee eee 62866 6 @ JEL we week luce FO eee eRe oa oe, (ee en oe ae ee ee ele | a en a ae ‘7. fe, aoe eesn2s 2a neeana C822 a ann as nnn ne - Sane ae a ae a ee oe ee) ee en ee ee ee ae aes Seana naweeaan es Been n. Bean = = a2 ee. Caen | Lele ae 2 eee ea) | 6 ae oe eeseee tiPieee@ 289 8&2 S282 fe za. * * > a ae aes. Ft 2 = & 7,2 es See &- Lass Beene, S2ee te ee ¢ FF 2? ee? & > @& eae. *_ -* * 7 a on oe ff = = © . >? 22224 a. i @@.}@=——— RR EO nn a Re = Sf Ce a ses Aare Baers sete Bee ases fs aeaenes ewease ‘2. 2 os 9 @ @ @@ 2. @ 2S Oe Besa See?) Be ges Bet. aa @€@etetsea ts Be awe mee me llltt—“‘“CO™SOSOSOSOSOOSSSOSCSCSCNN MIRE“ OGD @ Ql @S@)06 66635. 2 2) ew. 22) 2a) 2a] oe 2 [one lti‘(‘(‘ 0U@U6U6UtlUmUmt~COC”CR ec nn a ae Se 6S Re 6 PaaS } £eeaes Ft teen- Bees 722s @848;=;=———‘“ .. . . . © (MM GsG GG. Bee = © @ OS ee eae “See eae) oe es eee. ae es ee ee te Bes. ee 284 5 ..§ QM (GGG Gia £22 2 ee. Bee ee nnn oe enna. 2 f¢ 2 2.6 SS 62S eae e 86 BC&e £66266 8 atscsatese ....@0@6S ig 8 8€=€=©=£——CUMeO SE SB eS) 6 6DCUC RPS ES!hU6URUE2 CS UEeee6h USD CLR . LeGas Se 22 Bee 6! ee Se eee eee ek eee eT Taare Per Cent ae ea . "8 aN © Onan “om _- Om Ran as Fee Onna aate Linda 2 4 6.624 Communist Frances Gabow NASA STNOH =OCCSS SHrce conne SCONNS NOSSS cSoeoSe xonne 1 cee) Gol G EELTTT Semen sees sane sence conne maeeq ae ee 234308 BIBS £2223 . Scott. 98, Mr. Lyons 4 Tepes 22°22 £279 22. £PCTSwVeseee £tESBSE Ceces Plurality is from the Republican and Democratic Votes. eer nam Woodt Dewn State Cook County .. ‘otal Counties Adams Alexander Bond Boone Brown Bureau Calhoun Carroll Cass Champaign Christian Clark Clay Clinton Coles Cook Crawford Cumberland DeKalb DeWitt las . Edwards Effingham Fayette Ford Franklin Fulton Gallatin Greene G Hamilton Hancock Hardin Henderson Henry I s Jackson Jasper Jefferson JoDaviess Johnson Kane stite S° 2 89932 ELPE2 PLL: GGii? irs E ti es : *; 6-108 S323 33 SEGts SShes Sheed F8ic3 83:2 t Bi ii: ecce-o Gece On-cee © cee © eS 29982 © eocone Soeee o-~coe FF; > yl eh Fr e-oo 68S on o-2se0 “aoe a2sax’°s — | aa wo mote aZane “oe #38°5- age agpamee y = as - i Oe CONTS COSCON MMMM BOSS] S-COS NTOKM AMNMKOS NTOSHlD OMOM SNES BE cS x — Ss Ste St ert ro A] i Eg AASTSO NOAH SO CEN T= een COANE NAHTES ACA=-S 2 =—“A-S— NMANAS \2o7° 1ee=9 LeQeem £28948 SS eqeQqr = 72 SS22R ALSRS GIRS BASSS FSRRA SAGAR FRARF ARARA VREGR FASS S2G9R ZHARR ReGK= RABE ARSSH ERAS BESES SERSA SSSHR CESS cer rages San sz°s" * *aueO g aortain + egaune asad MAOH TOKMAR EMOEN CHCOR HEAD HEM EN AEON= LTA (or oe ==eae 12e~ -e= ; Pmeor- = -. R SSRES SESSA VSRSSS FSARR VASSS SSRSS FSVSS SSSSS KRFAKS SSAAS sRg2 Q2q22 BASza REEKZ RBRRG BRITE EaTEy BEERS aERRA FERg2 acces o 2aReR Kaan oO Sra SENT KKH BE°s" -*-SR $3U88 RAN*Z FGRSR FACET HGRA HAAS TNA BEARER *8RTE FHIEH nS ecccecoschae secceeefD D R Dt -R eee BEBSBe Se BBG Be £64932 C222. 24 2.5.4. 24.22 2. - 2.4. 2 oe 2 2 ses saan. &@eSepn, Sb es ft @8@22 64 23° 9429 222 2 2 2 428-2. tae -zcoa ne. e868 @ 8 8&® #2635 6 ss 88529 82 23.3 2.97 2.2 #£.9 2.4 3) 2,345.77). 2 2 2 a iy Tie: te ot « a a 2S eS Penent ats 2 re Re hy > we «a On Re CR ie ee ia eS ee 6 ee a! 6 Oe eee oS Fr oe y SS REE. et DBaeRBDSD @ BBS BB. oR Bem €2 72322 #82373 €2 2,2 2.9 2.9.8, 2. ee Se SSS ° 2 Sa 8.) £2 eae 2.) 2 eee > &o bh bebe ae a&tBBeenBe ea Baesees @2p,peee. @Osveaeapvrn 2-23.23. 2.2 33 5s ©. 2.9 ee) o> St EG ; *® eg BPeoetRe OBE aeE 8882 70 284 86° 6's. OF Ce £9845 2 Fe 2] [nate en es RD BBke @bebb &@ &@D QB BPRS 868.922 CO. 22° 2.9 2a Fs, Ss. 6 6h ;ectaeb e2 BSeSOhe €@eBeense ODeBaae #88 BVT, £49.82 6.9 C.ses 2. £2.52 2 oe. St SSeS ae 2 © ee A oe ot et ee 2 MOTE FOR SECRETARY OF STATE— NOVEMBER 7, 1972—Concluded | a Sina See e nate eee eae Rh eae CF YF ae eee Se fr ee Ae Se > a Se. Rae 6 ie a ‘ji nhe be eonpenhee#s eb e802 4£93.¢4¢732 O73 222 C8. 2) fF & 2.2.5. . 2a e Ben ah U6UctCe na 6¢ @!29 88 2 6828482 ° S322 2 2.2 2 2S Tae na aease)6 @#@ Bp esee @enbnn 2 S2B RB BRB BeSee © £2 29.24 2.2. 2S Sas heasepeee aoa=sbDpnheeo esewve @wPsense. €©€@ SB Bo £22 Ss. £254.26 #4x3£. 5. oe Se 2s 2 =e) 2s eee © ee SS. = 2S ae: oe ae. eee ee a ee ee ee ae oe aneeene @e8; @ @@. @BS Be ££. Cees 2. 2.2... Seeeeee6| 66h fbn eo @ess#% 88 4&8 2323 ©. S@Ses ee 2.24 22. =. 2. See . «2 Qt 4A ES ae Set Se wa gt et rs ow «at ee 2 Oe i —— a eae . Mr. Kucharski, Ee: Mr. eS 4. ite Votes. * * a 2 & Oe, i>. > a a oe oe tia s —Bes st (S22 2 2 eS ae one © Reeser 22.9393 2 a2 3222.2. 83.2 44.3 8.92.9. 5. 2.2.2.2 & © 22 5 4 al a al a al) | old HD Plurality is He Counties Write-Ins - 2:8 & 2 Aa &- @Yy sz wwe a “es © # . 2 ae @ se. 2 © . etn 8's as &y > bie & = a Sagas se es. 2 @ es ‘ae s s @ YB a a Sa . eeeeeeeernr 0 0 0 7 ce —aNeorneo cocoon — _ 2a°s Nn - ee 2 ee Se er + @ « owe a a --— & 2. McHenry McLean Macoupin Madison Marion Massac Menard Mercer Monroe RS Peoria... Perry . Piatt .... Pike Pulaski Putnam Ra Richland Rock Isla St. Clair Saline Sangamon Schuvier Scott Shelby Stark Stephenson Tavewell pees ts me ° oR" o. oe 7-gna" onnowe “a =~ Ns . Comm unist Pari Vv 17 ‘eee eeeee e nece coon nel] am! iit ; 8 % 8 & a > . -_ = . as 1972 iW ZR°RS =Ha-pae-en s2e° PZRAr= WSR gner- “="s- Ree SSS ee E.. Ra°RR SARWEROW RS 2=3” “gore “"5- green “S7R : R°="2 —€ —— Democratic Socialist Labor —. =. OF ILLINOIS—NOVEMBER 7, S Gage S393 38) 33|3 | eB] BSEES SSGSSHREOR Gags Eeaae casas susan agees scans >> & Bi & > | Democratic — as Bosen 11,221 2.633 2.775 169 419 6.007 1,193 2.639 3.038 21.605 8.336 3.359 3.298 197 8.942 4.094 2.349 10.967 2.741 2.822 63.584 4.239 1,110 4.953 4.679 103 9.277 8.563 2,022 949 103 089 675 2% 790 454 150 616 S48 911 599 972 316 876 2.109 796 644 672 710 1.224 15 3.882 10.140 682 618 3.171 197 628 74.986 122,642 eo et RE Bee b= > >~ BD db de be be Be >> ber > 4. BR a ke 4 VOTE FOR COMPTROLLER—NOVEMBER 7, 1972—Concluded Counties sfiiio oti oft orp a dD BP Stitt Geddaddddae sees SSSS2 SSERR4 RESER ASASS AAGEG i 2 wt et me © oe fy “Ee Ph & - pe Bp pb > >» pe Be be > TB - be ee be rh wee ty es Se eri ae YS ys Republican Jane S Haves Rader 14.724 2,720 3,390 6,004 1,212 10,557 1,109 5.351 3.088 29.098 6,998 4.49 3,827 5.544 10,359 .290 407 773 063 4.920 145,833 6,073 2.373 5,361 949 980 992 265 550 312 859 9 8 5305 33 120 263 839 43 507 SRR 867 270 749 VOTE FOR TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY } aes > oe ae i. eae oe «4 $333 2553 $2 52 Pp RR SUCRE a.) ee Ce Ms hide oh eke Cede Wie Le bees eke [coer en. Sess £22028 B28 SEhepme BEEkEaSE 28 2h w Beer th ee. ke} ave eRe tie Bf vee Sas fer ive FP esses see6e8 Scone eeReaaeeean © UU ULES Ue hee eshUrEUSEEE CUE: Teeaeeaeeene ne «6S BSS [hU Bees. BPeeee SSBB Be EBZEs fs Steet. Seeecne atene BCesene FEES Bees e #8 Teaeeaeeanees «Sees S82 e Berane SB2een BSBBEE ce eaeaeaaEeens 6S Se URE UB BOs UBC SBCEeShCUCUECUE SC Be? wwe}! ot ke > 2s 2 “*e#- . Mr. Lindberg. 60: Mr. Barringer. 42. peas feeis $3: 38 Ome lf Ul RU 6 2S eee See Seen Sheen Seen Seeks Paees 31 Cte eee Cee: tte et fens: eee es eee eee 6 Hi piiiBeiiii ighii fiice 47eh SiG giidi i Ghat Huatbsedi ollsg bald fodal pally Geld fell Plurality is C from the Republican and Democratic Votes. red Mr si ntaresat meniabc stake Tota Counties Carri Union Vermilion Wabash Warren Wasbington Wayne ..... White Fase Whiteside ..... will Wilhamson Winneba Woodfor’ Down State E16 E17 4.5 f : a ua . 1 65 2 271 4 461 1 6 2 Communist Party John Robert Lumpkin 7 3 PI 254 41 546 5 10 026 7.839 17.865 7 - n~ = —aNenn “Frown ror — - - NN _ = -_ ~ S35 2° gs a? - a ” ” 7 -o- 4 os = . = ,. 7 “aS £8 “"S32 ¢= #& =— _ a™ = - Socialist Labor S2ggS ANS RYRS“ ~eRS° ~aas~ Be=eA on@R= gage- a eRg =z J ” = = eC - ~ = yt pt pa De | Write-In Votes 79 w 8 7 b 8 66 ~~ Tian} “a+ pa Pe he bbe 7-ge2 NOVEMBER 7, 1972—Concluded o RESES S828R S2858 SRGHE BERLE FEAR EOSSR BAREZ BERSE F7BE Soa go ge ede) | iiiiiis LMFORNY SFY =—