# Petition — Satoskar v. Indiana Real Estate Commission

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385003_0967%3A1

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Petition
- **Published:** January 1, 1975
- **Citation:** 423 U.S. 928

## Text

oe

—_——

Supreme Court, U.S.
FiLE D
i

—- = ——--

, SeP/2 1975

Ree cee oe

MICHAEL RODAK, JR., CLERK

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER TERM 1975

——T5=330 |

NO.

VIJAY V. SATOSKAR, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARILY SITU-
ATED,
Petitioners,

Vv.

INDIANA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, THOMAS DICKSON,
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY: WARD DUNCAN, WILLIAM SCHMIDT,
CURTIS HUBER, HARLEY SNYDER, WILLIAM LONG, JAMES
BIBILYA, DAVID FAIR, CARL MILLER, REX BREEDEN, DON
McCULLOUGH, EUGENE McCLAIN, FRED KELLY, WAYNE
SMELTZER, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
INDIANA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, STATE OF INDIANA,
Respondents.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

M. Daniel Friedland
Attorney for Petitioners
445 N. Pennsylvania St

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Telephone: (317) 633-6229

ee ae

el Maa, ie iN tt

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER TERM 1975

NO.

VIJAY V. SATOSKAR, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARILY SITU-
ATED,
Petitioners,

Vv.

INDIANA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, THOMAS DICKSON,
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY: WARD DUNCAN, WILLIAM SCHMIDT,
CURTIS HUBER, HARLEY SNYDER, WILLIAM LONG, JAMES
BIBILYA, DAVID FAIR, CARL MILLER, REX BREEDEN, DON
McCULLOUGH, EUGENE McCLAIN, FRED KELLY, WAYNE
SMELTZER, MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
INDIANA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, STATE OF INDIANA,
Respondents.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

M. Daniel Friedland

Attorney for Petitioners

445 N. Pennsylvania St
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Telephone: (317) 633-6229

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

CASES Page

Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness
Society, U.S. , 95 S.Ct. 1612, 43 L.Ed.
ey See ee ee ee ee ee ee a

Brandenburger v. Thompson, 494 F.2d 885
EGelicis EPVED © oc ; es « * 6 6 8 8 cee ©

Bright v. Philadelphia- Baltimore-Washington
Stock Exchange, ° 327 F. no) 495, -” D. ree

ea ua coe eek eee ae
Donahue v. Stauton, 471 F.2d 475, (C.A. 7,
2 2.0 gs kh « 2 oe 6 & 6 ew OR Oe — 8

Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing to. 94 S.Ct.
ae. Gee 6 ee et ke 68 ree se

Fowler _Schwartmalder, 498 F.2d 143 (C.A.
8, sya . oak @ ort a ar i ee ee

Hall v. Cole, 412 U.S. 1, 93 S.Ct. 1943 (1973). 5

Hoitt v. Vitek, 495 F.2d 219 (C.A. 1, 1974) .. 8

In re Griffiths, 413 U.S. 717 (1973). ..... 13

La Raza Unida v. Volpe, S57 F.R.D. 94 (N.D.

Cal., 1972) a nei cere CG % se SK

Lee v. Southern Home Sites, 444 F.2d 143

ee eee gt ee eg tee | CO

Merola v. Atlantic Richfield, 515 F.2d 165
a en « ~i |

~

ee ee

-19- ‘

result is in accord with that reached in Townsend
v. Edelman (Nos. 73-1960, 73-1961, June 2, 1975),

decided this day by another panel of this court.

AFF IRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385003_0967%3A1. Public record. Not legal advice.