# Appellants Reply Brief — Lindsay v. Kelley

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385001_1312%3A4

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Appellants Reply Brief
- **Published:** January 1, 1969
- **Citation:** 395 U.S. 827

## Text

ey

ee

g cater serve y : ; 7 an a oe

a
SMuw COURT. U, & oa
L418 1259 = €-

Supreme Court of the United States =f

October Term, 1968.

No. 1370.

ALEXANDEF H. LINDSAY,
: Appellant,
Vv.

JOSEPH J. KELLEY, JR,
Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
Appellee.

APPELLANT’S REPLY TO APPELLEE’S MOTION TO
DISMISS AND REPLY TO MOTION OF THE PENN-
SYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION FOR LEAVE
_TO FILE A BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE.

James E. Bras.ey,

525 Broad-Locust Building,
Philadelphia, Pa. 19102

Attorney for bections.

International, 711 So. 50th St., Phila., Pa. 19143—Tel. SA‘ 7-8711 Area Code 215 ~°

We Tay ame = staammaniae

INDEX.
; ; s Page
A. Contra Amicus “History of Constitutional Reform in Pa.” 1
B. All Federal Issues Were: Before the Court Below ........ 2
S.C SN Sh on cineca cai netshe cus uawnenne oe 3
D. Judicial v. Legislative Supremacy . ae Per TT eT ere 6
E. Abrogation of Pennsylvania Constitutional Protections .... 11
CORI cn ki inc cue cee eescnatakvanswenen pinnenvenunes 13
Excerpt From Brief of Interested Person in Pennsylvania
NG SIE et |

_—-—~(1) To declare the provisions of the Act of March 15,
1967, No. 2, relating to the time and period of publication
and the time for conducting a referendum’ on the -conven-
tion’s proposals to be unconstitutional and void; and

(2) To declare the referendum held at the 1968 Pri-
- mary to be in violation of the Constitution, void and of.
no effect. —

Respectfully submitted,

W. J. Krencewicz, o

Attorney for Interested Person
Under Rule 65.

4,

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385001_1312%3A4. Public record. Not legal advice.