# Motion to Affirm — Peerless Stages, Inc. v. United States

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385001_0241%3A4

## Record

- **Collection:** Supreme Court brief
- **Document type:** Motion to Affirm
- **Published:** January 1, 1962
- **Citation:** 371 U.S. 22

## Text

~~" Be Sat Wey
ES

“eae

ve 4 Watt ee

= a - _
y sre i Saat
. « ae
— od . ¥
yy . : WAT " * } m e-
rr " £ * SY eee
é ahi, _— b : . 2 ee
“ . Noy w
eq ¢
~ {os
£ i . a
. > S
Me
ae, . &
os “ .
te
— »
; we
*
SS ‘ ,
’
» a ~
; ‘
s >
* . 7 a
. .
. -
v
.
“ ~~
-% &
‘ >
-
~ .
4

ote) RR
Statement. 9. ey ter as Seaiyes
MI db woxe vad. ade es ee ‘i
Conclusion: - -..--..~-- +; :
Fie loaceta de
Cases: -

SAB. & W. Transit Cov. United States, 14

. Car. Cases, Par. 81,395..2______-
. [American Trucking Ass’ns v. United States,
3 “344 US. 298. - ats
~ Crescent Express Lines, The: Vv. . United ‘States,
49 F. Supp. 92, affirmed 320 ELS. 401-
. Federal Trade Commission v. S hndard oil Co 0.,
ee Ce sh oes coe we

Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. l ‘nited States,

82 F. Supp. 153, affirmed, 338 U.S. 802°
‘ Interstate Commerce Commission v. J- T Fran. 8-

en ar ee SP Oe oe os ose ec -

Interstate Commerce Commission v. "Parker,
326 U.S. ey eae

N ational Bus Traffic Ass’n v. ‘ot Tnited States,
143 F. Supp. 689, affirmed 352 U. S. 1020

| " Regulations Governing Special. or. Chartered

‘Party Service, 29 M.C.C. 26... .-\.-
; Seaboard Air Line RR. Cov. United States, 131
F, Supp. 129, affirmed 349 U.S. 902... ___,
United States v. Detroit and Cleveland Nav. Co.,
326 U.S. 236... __- re iene he WES ees:

655147—62 -

“a

oa Cases —"Cositinued

- United States v. Pierce Auto P "reight Lines, 327 in
7 | ee SAE eS Re eM RRR aes
United States v. Rock lidand Co., 340-U.S. oe... 8
Universal Camera Corp. v. . Labor Board, 340 |
toe: S| tae s eee nit ss dae as ca
Statute and setiaties: Ti "pa - a
Interstate Commerce Act, Part TI, 49 Stat.
543, 49 U.S.C. 301, et seq.: } oh
Section 205(b)s.-.- 2 aii ieesyes ;
; _ Section SN Saimin s pin can cous 2 :
ek Se ——. *
“Section 208(c)-------- -nighves, ses ee
| Ee eee” prea
CN | * I ac oon oct eetweaen tak
'. *Seetion 208(c)...-.).---=-- cae Md a
ee ae kc

ae

AN NNAAMNW -

- »

on fhe ies Court of the Bited vines

Oc ‘TOBER TERM, 1962

+
ae No. 262

ad me

_ PEERLESS Sraas, Inc, APPEL. LANT
| v. : . ‘
Unirep SratEs OF. AMERICA, Ernaie aTE Com MERCE.

Commission, AND THE GREYHOUND Corporation
; 3 e ‘ . *) ge

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ate TO AFFIRM

¢ . : . oo , * Lee Loevincer,
“ Assistant Attorney General.

Rosert B. He MMEL, .
Attorne ¥y.

Ropert W. GINNANE,
General Counsel,
Artur J. Cerra, /
Assistant General Counsél, a
é Interstate Commerce Commission. r

Avevst 1962.

ad

US SOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1968 ~

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/brief%3Amicro_IA40385001_0241%3A4. Public record. Not legal advice.