# Pacholder High Yield Fund, Inc.

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Asec%3Ab0f4fa4a85704ec1

## Record

- **Collection:** Agency decision
- **Document type:** Agency decision

## Text

January 18, 2013

Frank J. Nasta
Pacholder High Yield Fund, Inc.
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Re: Pacholder High Yield Fund, Inc. (“Fund”)
Incoming Letter dated November 19, 2012
Dear Mr. Nasta:
The proposal would require that certain information be included in the annual and quarterly
reports of the Fund.
There appears to be some basis for your view that the Fund may exclude the proposal under
rule 14a-8(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). We note that the
proponent appears to have failed to supply, within 14 calendar days of receipt of the Fund’s request:
(1) documentary support sufficiently evidencing that he satisfied the minimum ownership requirement
for the one-year period required by rule 14a-8(b) under the Exchange Act; and (2) a written statement
that the proponent intends to hold the requisite amount of the Fund’s securities through the date of the
shareholder meeting as required by rule 14a-8(b) under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we will not
recommend enforcement action to the Commission if the Fund omits the proposal from its proxy
materials in reliance on rules 14a-8(b) and 14a-8(f) under the Exchange Act.
Attached is a description of the informal procedures the Division follows in responding to
shareholder proposals. If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please call me
at (202) 551-6773.
Sincerely,

Kieran G. Brown
Senior Counsel
Office of Disclosure and Review

Attachment
cc: Gil Marchand

DIVISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
INFORMAL PROCEDURES REGARDING SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
The Division of Investment Management believes that its responsibility with
respect to matters arising under Rule 14a-8 [17 CFR 240. 14a-8], as with other matters
under the proxy rules, is to aid those who must comply with the rule by offering informal
advice and suggestions and to determine, initially, whether or not it may be appropriate in
a particular matter to recommend enforcement action to the Commission. In connection
with a shareholder proposal under Rule 14a-8, the Division's staff considers the
information furnished to it by an investment company in support of its intention to
exclude the proposals from the investment company's proxy material, as well as any
information furnished by the proponent or the proponent's representative.
The staff will always consider information concerning alleged violations of the
statutes administered by the Commission, including argument as to whether or not
activities proposed to be taken would be violative of the statute or rule involved. The
receipt by the staff of such information, however, should not be construed as changing the
staff's informal procedures and proxy review into a formal or adversary- procedure.
The determination reached by the staff in connection with a shareholder proposal
submitted to the Division under Rule 14a-8 does not and cannot purport to "adjudicate"
the merits of an ihvestment company's position with respect to the proposal. Only a
court, such as a U.S. District Court, can decide whether an investment company is
obligated to include shareholder proposals in its proxy material. Accordingly a
discretionary determination not to recommend or take Commission enforcement action,
does not preclude a proponent, or any shareholder of an investment company, from
rights he or she may have against the investment company in court, should
pursuing
the management omit the proposal from the investment company's proxy material.

any

Pacbo ldcr High Yicld Fu nd, Inc.
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017

November 19. 2012

Via Elcctronic Mail (IMshareholderproposa ls@sec.gov)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Conunission
Division of Investment Management
Office of Disclosure and Review
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549·8626
Re:

Pacholder High Yield Fund. Inc.- Stockholder Proposal Submitted bv Gil Marchand

Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Pacholder High Yield Fund, Inc., a closed-end investment company listed on the
NYSE MKT (the "Fund"), is filing this letter under Rule 14a-8(j) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Ace) to notify the Securities and Exchange Comm ission
(the "Commission'") of the Fund's intention to exclude a stockholder proposal from the proxy
materials for the Fund's 2013 annual meet ing of stockholders. Mr. Gil Marchand (the
"Proponent") submitted a stockholder proposal on March 30, 2012 (the '·Proposal"). A copy of
the Proponent's letter and Proposal is attached hereto as Exhibit A
The Fund respectfull y requests that the Commission's Division of Investment
Managcment staff (the "StafT') not recommend that enforcement action be taken by the
Commission against the Fund if the Fund excludes the Proposal from its 2013 proxy materials
for the reasons set forth be low.
The Fund intends to file its definitive proxy materials for its 20 13 annual meeting on or
about March I, 2013. This letter and its exhibits are being subm itted via e-mail to
IMshareholderproposals@sec.gov. A copy of this letter and its exhibits will also be sent to the
Proponent.
I.

BAC KGRO UND

On March 30, 2012, the Fund recei ved a letter from the Proponent that included the
Proposal. The letter stated that the Proponent was "a qualified shareholder under Rule 14a-8 of
the Act" but did not include any further information about the Proponent, such as a written
statement that the Proponent intends to continue to hold the securities through the date of the
shareho lder's meeting Or proof of ownership. The Fund has eonfinned that the Proponent is not
a shareholder of record .

On April 11, 20 12, in accordance with Rul e 14a-8(f), the Fund sent a letter (the
" Response Letter") via Federal Express to the Proponent I notifyi ng him that he did not comp ly
with the eligibility and procedural requirements of Rule 14a-8. The Response Letter set forth
the eligibility and procedural requirements, included a copy of Rule 14a-8 and also stated that the
Proponent had 14 calendar days from receipt to provide the req uisite information. A copy of the
Response Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
As o f the date of submission of thi s letter, the Fund has not received any further
correspondence from the Proponent.
II.

BASIS FOR EXCLUS ION

Rule 14a·8(f)(I) a nd Rule 14a-8(b)(2) - The Proposa l May Be Excluded Pursuant to Rule
14n-8(f)( I) Becnuse the Proponent Did Not Provide the Required Proof of Eligibility and a
Written Statement that the Proponent Intends to Continue to Hold the Securities Through
the Date of the Shareholder 's Meeting.
Rul e 14a-8(b)(2) provides that in submitting a proposal, if a shareholder is not a
registered holder of the securities, he or she must provide proof of beneficial ownership of the
securities to the co mpany in one of two ways. The shareho lder can either: (i) submit a written
statement fro m the "record" holder of the securities veri fying that, at the time the proposal was
submitted, the shareholder continuously held the securities for at least one year; or (ii) submi t a
copy ofa fil ed Schedule l3D, Schedule 13G, Fonn 3, Fonn 4, Fonn 5, or amendments to those
documents or updated fomls, filed with the Commi ssion reflecting ownership of securities for
the one year period as of the date of the statement. In addition, the shareholder is requi red to
include hi s or her own written Slatement that he or she intends to continue to ho ld the securities
through the date of the shareholder's meetin g.
The Proponent's letter stated that he was a "qualified shareholder under Rule 14a-8 of the
Act", but did not include proof of beneficial ownership nor did it include a statement that the
Proponent intends to continue to hold the securities through the date of the shareholder's
meeting.
Under Rul e 14a-8(f)(I), a company may exclude a shareholder proposal if the proponent
is not the record owner and fails to provide appropri ate proo f of eligibility in accordance with the
eligibility requirements of Rule 14a-8(b)(2), prov ided that the company timely notifies the
proponent of the deficiency and the proponent fails to correct the deficiency within the required
time period. The Staff has previously pennitted the exclusion of shareholder proposals pursuant
to Rule 14a-8(1) w hen the proponent has fai led to provide sufficient documentary support of
eli gibility under Rule 14a-8(b)(2).'
The Fund sent the Response Letter, which notified the Proponent of the various
procedural defects, to the Proponent within the required time period.) The Proponent did not
I The Proponent did not inc lude any COlltact infonnatioo in his !cU"f. The Fund mailed the Response Leuer to the fCturn address listed on the
envelope in which the Proponent's letter was sent.
l See, e.g .. Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Strategy Fund (pub. HVHil. Mar. 21 , 20(2) (pennining exclusion whcre "thc proponent failed to supply
documentary support sufficiently evidencing thal. he satisfied the minimum ownership requirement for the one·yeaT period required by rule
14a-8(b)"); Walgreen Co. (pub. 8\·ail. Oct. I, 2012) (pcnniuing exclusion where the "the propon"nt appcar!i to have failed 10 supply, within 14
days of receipt of Walgreen's request. documentary support sufficiently evidencing that he satis fied the minimum ownership requirement for
the one·yellr period required by rule 14a·8(b)").
Included in Exhibit B is a delivery confirmation from Federal Express.

respond to the Response Letter within the 14 calendar response deadline, as required by Rule
14a-8(f)(1). Any further verification the Proponent might now submit would be untime ly under
the Commission's rules. Therefore, the Proposal is excludable pursuant to Rule 14a-8(f) because
the Proponent did not remedy the eli gibility deficiency on a timely basis after notification by the
Fund.

III .

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing analysis, the Fund hereby respectfully requests that the Staff
confirm that it will not recommend enforcement action be taken by the Commission against the
Fund if the Fund excludes the Proposal from its 2013 proxy materials. We would be happy to
provide any additional information and answer any questions that the Staff may have regarding
this submission.
If we can be of any further assistance in the matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at
212-684-0894 or via e-mail atfrank.j.nasta@jpmorgan.com. Please acknowledge receipt of this
letter by return e-mail. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,

~r~
Frank J. Nasta, Secretary
cc:

Gil Marchand

Exhibit A

i

•

~

c}

~
;+-

.J
v

r
c

p
I

"

-n
- '\ 0­

Ci~
r

?

,"~

f ,?­­
:>, 5r

­

~

-,::c

,
'"

I!

",,x

", ~-.

'p

,
""

-

" ,-,'"

"

~
~

,
f

;...)
>

-

~

,

~

;'l

'"", f-1
I

Mr. Frank Na sta
Secretary. Pacholder High yield Fund Inc.
270 Pa rk Ave.
New York. NY 10017
Re : Shareholder Proposal
Dear Mr. Nasta,
I am a qualified shareho lder under Rule 14a-8 of the Act. I would like included in the 2013 proxy of the
closed end fu nd listed above, the following proposal :
The Company describe in its quarterly and annual reports a) downgrades and upgrades during the most
recent report period b) realized gains and losses of more than 10% during the most rece nt report period
c) defa ults experienced in the most recent reporting period d) any recoveries experienced during the
most recent reporting period e) any cumulative hold ings in a borrower that is more than 3% of net
asset s. the current marks on the security or securities of each borrower over 3% of net assets as of the
end of the reporting period and a very brief description of the manager's view of the borrower or
borrowers.

11 dS/

Re~r~
GQ

archand

Exhibit B

P:u.'holdc r High Yield Fund, ln c.
270 Park A venue
New York, NY 10017

April 11, 2012

Vila Overn igh l Mail
Attn: Gil Marchand
Kni ghts of Columbus
I Co lumbus Plaza
New Haven, CT 06510-3326

Re:

Shareholder Report Proposal - Pacholdcr Hi gh Yield Fund. Inc. (the "Fund")

Dear Mr. Marchand:
I am writing in responsc to your lettcr we received on Friday, March 30, 2012 in wh ich
you request we include a proposal in the Fund ' s 2013 proxy statement to require certain
information in the Fund's shareholder reports. We appreciate your proposal and have carefully
considered it. However. after reviewing the information co ntained in the current reports against
the information requested in yo ur proposal, we kindl y ask that you consider withdrawing the
proposa l in light of the robust disclosure already contained in the Fund's repons and elsewhere.
which we believe addresses much of you r proposal (as we detail further below). If, aCier
considering this letter, YOll would like to continue with yOllr proposal, we ask that you resllbmit
your proposal to comply with a number of securities law procedural requirements described
below.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that registered management
investment companies, such as the Fund. make available 10 shareholders and/or file with the SEC
certain reports, and that the COnlent of these reports contain certain infonnation. The infonnation
contained in the Fund 's reports is designed to comply with these care fully constructed SEC
requiremen ts, which, for semi-annual and annual reports, require the inclusion of:
•
•
•
•

Financial statements;
A lisl of portfolio ho ldings;
A chart depicti ng the portfolio holdings by a reasonably identifiable category
(e.g., industry sector); and
Financial highlights. including certain per share operating performance data.

For quarterly reporting, the SEC requires that the Fund file ~_-t?TFrank J. Nasta. Secretary

I hercby withdraw the shareholder report proposal for Pacholdcr High Yield Fund, Inc.

Date: _ _ __ _ __
Gil Marchand

Regulations 14A, 14C, a nd 14N (I)roxy Rules)

Rule 1 4.'1-~
Rule 14a-8 ,

5728

Shurcho lde r !'roposals.·

llu~ section addresses when a com pany m ust illClutle a !o.h an:holOcr's proposal in its pro:o;y
statement and identify the proposal in il~ form of proll:)' when the cornp:my holds :In annUlll or
~pecilll meeting of shareholdcr1i. In summary. in order 10 ha\'e your sh;m:holder propo!IIIl iocludt:d
(1(\ a compuny's pro'\;)' card. and inclu,k:d along wi th nny supporting statement in its proxy stllte­
ment, )'ou mn"" he ellgihle and follow certain pmcedure.~. Under B fe\\,' spoc:inc drcumSl.:mccs. the
C(mlpotny i, rermiU"d UJ exclude your I'TOpOsal. Out only after submrUrng Il' re:t.~'n.~ 10 the
COlllnlL~sion . We structured this section in a quc.qkm-{lnd-answer fomUlI !l0 that II LS easier to
undC'r1iland. The references to "you" ;Lre to a shareholder ....."C ~ ing 10 ~ubmi t lhe proposal.

(a) Q uestion I : W h:1I is >I Pro IMJSaI?
A !J\:lrehold",- propos:lI is YOILr recommendation or rcqu ircmcOlt hat the f;OI'np;:my and/or illl boon!
of diT1l(.1(>I"li take action, ..... hith you intend \0 present at a mccling uftl-.e eomJlll n y'~ sh.:m:holdellO, Your
proposal should stnle (l.~ e lenr ly as possihle lhe COUl'llC of actiOn Ih:1t yo u be lieve the t'Olnpany should
fnllow. If your Jlffil'ns:t..I is placed o n the COTllP:U1Y'~ proxy can!. the CU1ll pnny m llst liiso provitle in lhe
form of lm);\y mellllS for siJ;lreh"ldcn; to ~pcdry by boxes M cho ice bt'lwee:n aPl"rlIvnl or disa l}('fOvUI, or
nbsteminn. Unle.~s N hcrwisc indicu!OO. (he word "proposal" I~~ w.ed in (hi s ..:celion refers boIh !O your
propot-al. (md 10 your corn.:~I'(){ldi ng st3temcnl in support of your propos;1l (if any).

(h) Qu(';;tloll 2: Who is eli~i hl e 10 s u b mi t II p r o posa l, Imd Imw do I dCllluIIsln tl r 10 lite
l'omprillY IIUlt t lim eligi ble?
(I) In order tn be eligible to submi t a proposal, ylMI must have tounli nuollsly hel d :lt leas!
S2,uno ill Inmet value, nr 1%. of the compa ny's scc urilie.~ entitled 10 be \ntf,.'{] on the proposal 01.1
the meeting for al leasl one year by the dale you submit tile proposal. You must continue to hold
I~ ~u(ilies through the date of the mccting,
(2) If you an: the registered holtler of your securi ties. wh ich means that your name :Ippear5 in
lhe company's rt."\.ouros as a shar\:hoIdcr, lhe company ea n verify your eitgibi lity on ils own.
:Illhough you will Slill run'e to provide the COtnp;llly wit h a written statement that you inlend \0
contmue 10 hold the sccurilic.~ Ihrough Ihe dale of lhe meeling o f shmoolders. Huwever. if tile
many shareholders yOIl are not a regislered holder, the eOmp.1rly likely does nO! know Ihal you are a
shareholder. or how many sh3res you own. In Ihis case. allhe. Ijn~ yoo suhmit your proposal. you
must pnwe )'our eligihilily to the etlrnl'any in one of 1.....0 wa)~:
(i)'Ibt: lir1it way b to ~ubmil 10 the company a wrillen ~Iatemcnt from the "1'1Xord" holder of
)'our "I.'Curitie.~ (usulllly a hroter Of bantl ven fying that, at the tllne you SUhlllitted your proposal.
)CM1 emmnu()LJsly held the securilies for allea.q onc year. Ynu mUM also incluUe your OIN" written
Malemem Ihal you rntend 10 conlinue 10 huld lilt., secUrilLe.~ through the dme of the meeting nf
sh:u'eholdcl'~: or

( ii) TIle second way 10 prove oINllCrsh ip nppl iCti only if you have nJcd a Schedu le 130,
Schedule IlG. Form 3, Fonn 4 and/or Fonn 5. or amend lm:n ls 10 thulIC doc ume nls or updated
fonns. renr:cli ng yOLir ownersh ip of the sh;!fCS as of or be fu~ lhe dale CII\ whieh the onc-ycar

+1'..HL'Clivc ScptClnocr 20, WI I , Rule 141.-8 WlL' 3nICndild by n::vi~i l!lI poILrngraph (1){111 as p:m of the
amendments f:lCilila1inll !ih:utbuJller dircns of !be DudtJ_F.....,k /1.,\ ,."'"rina \0 """'""hol~ approVAl of e~eru\i\"l.'
~nsaclO·9178,
(HUU.lmN No, 26 1, 10- 14-11)

Rule 14a-8

Regulations 14A, H e, and J4N (Proxy Rules)

5729

eligibility period beghL~. If you h.'IYe: filed one. of these documents with tiM! SEC. you may dem·
Onstnlle ynur eligibility by subrnilling 10 the company:
(A) A copy of the scbc:dule aod/or form. and any sui>scQuent amendme nts reporting I!. ch~nge
in your ownership level;

(8) Your wrillell SlalCfI)cm lhm you L'Oflti lllJO\J.miued for a
regut:U'ly scheduled annual meeting. The pmp0i'i:I! must be n:eeived at the company's princip,'!1
ellecolive offices not Ie.~s lhan 120 calenpI,-'" i1 ;

UNIltf' I/> PI,mgnw" (iX /0); A ~(l!l1pa ny mny c\c!ude a sha rehold~r prop()sal thai would
an mlvi.""lry \'OIe or seck future lldyi .­
miued to the cnrnl,any by allOl.hcr proponcnlthal will be incl uded in the ooll1p;\n y'~ pru~y malerials
for the s.:J.rnc meeting:
(12 ) R~:mbmi.uiOl'S; If the ~I deals with subst.1ntially the samc subjC(:1 nUUlcr as
another pmposltl (lr prupos:tls that hUll or have been previously included ill lhe COlllpany's proxy
ntllteriu.ioclude it fmlll it5 prollY
m3tcriil.l~ for any meeting held within 3 calendar )'cars of Ihe 1n.(1 lime it was induOcd if the
propn calendar ye ars:
(ii) l..ess than 6% of the yote on its Iw;t submission 10 ~hareholdcrs if I'roposctl twice preyiously
within the pn.:ceding S calendar yean: Of

·Effocl; ve September 20.2011 . I(ule 1.la-8 was arllendcd hy revi.ing p:ln.grnph (i)(M) as pat! or lho:
ulIlcndmcnts f:M:ilil:uillll shllrcholder di,eclor n"rninaLI(>n~. Sec SI;C Release Nos. 31·92.~9: 34-tiSJ4J: IC·
29?K8: September ".2011. See also SEC Rcle:\.'\C No,;. .13-9136: 34-621fl4: [C-29384 (Aull. 25. 2(10): SEC'
Release NO'. 3)-9 [49: 34-6.303t: lC·29-t.s6 (M 0( lho: Dodd- r'1"1U\t Ac! "'t:U'n, 10 llhareholder lIpproval of execuli,'e
"'''''l'''llSaIion ~nd ",Iokn pnrochutc eOlnp;!1UaIi •.., atrMgcmcnlll. Sec SEC Rde""" NO&. 3.\-91111: 1-1..(>3168;
bnu:ory 25. 201 t. ("","j",~.(' IAUf': ,\prH 4. 2011 . For other rompU= dale!' ",[mcd CO lhi~ relc~. '" SEC
Iklcasc N". )3'11111.

( n LII.t.Y.TIN No. 261 , 10. [4- ( 1)

Rule 14:1-8

Reguhttions 14A, J4C, a nd 14N (proxy Rules)

5732

(iii) Le!>.~ th:ln 10% of the vote nn ils III~I ~ lIbl1l i~sion to shareholders if proposed three limes or
more previously lVithin the preceding 5 !;nlendur y~rs; :Uld
( 13) Spt!cific A//Imlllf of l)jfid~lIds: If the proposal relates 10 slX-'Cifi e amounts of cas/lor stnd
dIvide nds.

(jl Q Ul'!Sl io n 10: \"h;It pfiloCed u rt'S mus l thl' comp.my follow if It intends 10 exdool' my
p ro lJOSaI?
(I) If the compan y mteoos 10 exclude II proposnl from tl~ proxy lllatCfillL~, it must file itll rcason.~
wi th the Cnmmission no Imer than 80 ealendoJr days before it fill'S it ~ definitive proxy slIltcmenl and
form o f pro"y wlIh Inc COlllmi~sion. 11te company mu.~t ~inlUl lancousl y provide )"ou wi th II copy of iL~
submission. The Commis..\ion s(aff rna)" permit the ~'OIlljXUly 10 mili il$ IiUbmi.'lS1on lata thall 80 day~
before the company files ilS definiti' e proxy statement and foml o f proxy. if the company dcmOllslr,ilCS
good cause for mis.'1ing lhe deadline.
(2) The conlp~ ny must file siJo. pilper ooPlc.~ of the follo wing:

(il 1ltc proposal:
(ij) An expl;mll tio n of why the cOIl1p:tny bclieve~ th:1I it may excl ude the ptopOS.:ll, whi ch
should, if pos..~ible. refcr to the mo~t rece nt uppli cllble authority. soch Il~ prior Divillion letters is.~llcd
unOcr tbe rule:; .illd

(iii) A supponing OIli nion of cotm seJ when such rca....>IlS are ba.~ on matten. or stilte or
foreign law.
( k) Queslion I J: May I s ubmit III)' 0\0"0 s t:d e ment to the COl11l11is.'iiOiI reslK)udillj! to the
t'olllfla IlY's ar"l:u llle nt.~·!

Yes, you lIIay submit a response. but it is ont r1.ion IZ: Ir Ihe com pan), includes my s hare holder Jlroposal io i t.~ proxy mate rial'!.
what information lIhout me ,IIlL'> ' iI incl ude alo ng with Ihe pro lM.s;\I itwlr!

( I ) The company '~ P'Uxy slutemcut mus t include your nllme and a(k1res.~. as well M the
number or the c(lll1p:m y's voting scc urit il!!i [hat you hold. j·loW\:ve r. itL"te:ld of providing tlt'll
inf'nlllation. Ihe comp;LJiy m"y instead include It .~tatcmentthat il ", ill provide the infonnat ion to
.~ hllT1.'holdcrs promptly up",n receiving an oral Of writt en requeSl.

cn The company is nOi l"C..«pon..ible for the contcnL~ of your proposal Of supporting SI.:llemCni.
(m) Q ueslion 13. W hal ca n J dn if the COlllllao Y ind n des in illl Il roxy slatement rt'asons
why il hel il'n's s hnreh"Jdf.'n> s hould nut \'o le In f,I\'<lr of my I'rullOSll l, and J disllgrt~ wil.h smu t'
o r lis slal e ments'!
( I) Th e I'tJlupuuy n'~y c lect 10 incluUc in il~ proxy statement fClI!iOllS why il bclieve.~ shareholders
should vOlt' ag:llnst your propct;a1. TIle com pauy is alJow.:d to make arguments reflecting its own poinl
or view, JUS! Illl you may express your own poim of view in your propOS:ll's supporting Slatemenl.
(2) HOWl'VCf. if you be lie"e thatlhc oom pany·.~ Of1I"JO&il inn 10 )'our propos:lJ contnins m.1lerillJl y
false or misleading slatements that may violate our anti- rmud mle. Ru le 14a· 9. you should promptl y
SI:nd to the CornrllillSiuo staff and the. com p:rny a leiter explaini ng the reasons for your view, along
with a copy of the company's SLaterncnts opposi ng your p~l . Tn the eX len! pm.~ible. your leller
!ohould include iIpI..'Cilic fa.::tuul infonll<ltioll demon.~trJting the inaccuracy o f the compan y's claims.
Time penninin/;. you lII:!y wis h to try to work nu t your d iffercocCII with the eompany hy yO\lrself
before cont:lcling the Conmli~sinn staff.
Ohll.U -:TIN No. 261, 100 14-JI)

R~ulations 14.'\., J4C, and 14N (Proxy Rules)

5733

(3) We require the com~lIly 10 send you II copy of its ~1:lIemt:n(i opposing your proposal
before il £ends its prox y materials. so Ihal you may bring 10 our attention any materially flll~ or
misleading st:lIements, under the followi ng limr:::framcs:

0 ) If our no-actioo !'espouse fecju ires that you make fevision~ 10 your proposal Of supponing
St:UC!nCnt lIS II condition to requiring the company to include it in its proxy materials. then the
r;Q1l1pany must provi de you with a copy of its o pposition statements no llller than 5 calendar dllY~
after the co mpany rlX'eive~ 11 copy of your revised propoS3.l: o r
(ii) In all olher CI\:iC.', the company must provide you with p copy of its oppoosition statcme nts
no later thnn 30 calendar days before: it filc~ definitivc copie$ of its prox y statement and roml of
proxy under Rule 14a-6.

Lekstutis. Carm ine

From:
Sent:

To:
Subj ect :

Barbato, Christine M
Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:48 AM
Lekstutis , Carmine
FW: FedEx Shipment 793443588561 Delivered

-----Original Message----­
From: trackingupdates@fedex.com [mailto;trackingupdates@fedex. com )
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2912 19:42 AM
To: Barbato, Christine M
Subject: FedEx Shipment 793443588561 Delivered

This tracking update has been requested by:
Company Name:
Name:
E-mail:

CHRIST INE BARBATO
christine.m.ba rbatQ@1pmchase.com

Message:

Your shi pment

)PM(

Our records indicate that the following
Reference:
Ship (P/U) date:
Delivery date:
Sign for by:
Del ivery location:
Delivered to:
Service type:
Packaging type:
Number of pieces:
weight:
Special handling/Services:
Tracking number:

has been shipped

shipment has been delivered:

017999

Apr 11, 2912
Apr 12, 2012 10:30 AM
.ROBERTO Z
New Haven, CT
Mailroom
FedEx priority Overnight
FedEx Envelope
1

0.50 lb.

Direct Signature
Deliver Weekday

Required

793443588561

279 Park Avenue
New York

Recipient I nformation
Gil Marchand
Knights of Columbus
1 Col umbus Plaza
New Haven

NY

CT

Shipper I nformation
CHRISTINE BARBATO
)pM(

US

US

19017

06510

Please do not respond to this message. This email was sent from an unattended mailbox. This
report was generated at approximately 9:41 AM COT on 04/12 / 2012.
To learn more about FedEx Express, please visit our website at fedex. com.

All weights ar e estimated.
To t rack t he status of this shipment online, please use the following:
https:/lwww.fedex.com/insi g ht/findit/nrp.jsp?t ra cknu mberS~793 44 358856 1&l angu age = e n&opco: FX& cl

ientype:ivpodalrt
Thi s tracki ng update has been sent to you by FedEx on the behalf of the Requestor noted
above. FedEx does not validate the authenticity of the reque stor and does not va lid ate,
guarantee or warrant the authenticity of the request, the requestor's message, or the
accuracy of th i s tracking update. For tracking results and fedex.com's terms of use, go to
fedex. com.
Tha nk you for your busin ess .

,

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Asec%3Ab0f4fa4a85704ec1. Public record. Not legal advice.
