# UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Asec%3A540f743a94d1df56

## Record

- **Collection:** Agency decision
- **Document type:** Agency decision

## Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Release No. 105156 / April 7, 2026
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-21836
In the Matter of
Claire P. Shaughnessy,
Respondent.

:
:
:
:
:
:

ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF
DISTRIBUTION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-21837
In the Matter of
Aon Investments USA Inc., fka
Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting,
Inc.,
Respondent.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

On January 25, 2024, the Commission issued two related Orders (collectively, the
“Orders”) against Claire P. Shaughnessy (“Shaughnessy”) 1 and Aon Investments USA Inc., fka
Aon Hewitt Investment Consulting, Inc. (“Aon”). 2
In their respective Orders, the Commission ordered Aon to pay disgorgement of
$495,098.50, prejudgment interest of $47,089.29 and a civil penalty of $1,000,000.00, and
Shaughnessy to pay a civil penalty of $30,000.00, to the Commission. In each of the Orders, the
Commission also created a Fair Fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, so the funds collected can be distributed to harmed investors and ordered that the funds
1
Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist
Order, Advisers Act Rel. No. 6535 (Jan. 25, 2024), (Admin. Proc. File No. 3-21836).
2
Corrected Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and
203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Ceaseand-Desist Order, Advisers Act Rel. No. 6536 (Jan. 25, 2024), (Admin. Proc. File No. 3-21837).

may be combined with any other distribution fund or fair fund arising out of the same facts that
are the subject of the Orders.
In accordance with the Orders, the $1,572,187.79 collected from Shaughnessy and Aon
has been combined (collectively, the “Fair Fund”) and deposited in a Commission-designated
account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Any accrued interest will be added to the Fair
Fund. The assets of the Fair Fund are subject to the continuing jurisdiction and control of the
Commission.
On March 25, 2025, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, published a Notice of
Proposed Plan and Opportunity for Comment 3 (“Notice”) and simultaneously posted the
Proposed Plan of Distribution (the “Proposed Plan”), for a 30 day period to allow comments
from the public, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and
Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s Rules”). The Notice advised all interested persons that
they may obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan from the Commission’s public website at
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/fairfundlist.htm or by submitting a written request to Keshia W.
Ellis, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC
20549-5876. All persons who desired to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their
comments in writing, no later than April 25, 2025. The Commission received one comment
during the comment period (the “Comment Letter”).
After considering the comment received on the Proposed Plan, the Commission staff
recommends that the plan be amended to extend the Relevant Period.
After careful consideration, the Commission concludes that that Proposed Plan should be
approved as amended.
I.
A.

Public Comment on the Proposed Plan

By letter dated April 24, 2025, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP (“Morgan Lewis”), the
law firm that represents PSERS, made four comments to the Proposed Plan, objecting to: (1) the
plan’s limitation of eligible losses to investment fees; (2) the definition of the Relevant Period;
(3) the dispute process set forth in the Plan; and (4) the calculation of Fees Paid in the Plan of
Allocation (Exhibit A to the Proposed Plan). The Commission considered the objections and
finds that the relevant period should be extended, which would give PSERS, the single harmed
client, the lesser of the total amount of investment advisory fees paid by the preliminary
Claimant to the Respondents during the Relevant Period, plus Reasonable Interest, calculated
pursuant to the Plan or the Net Available Fair Fund. Consequently, the other objections do not
need to be considered.
The Relevant Period is defined in the Proposed Plan as July 1, 2020 through March 31,
2021. The Comment Letter objected to Paragraph 2 of the Proposed Plan that would limit
recovery to “investment advisory fees that it paid between July 1, 2020, through March 31,
3

Exchange Act Rel No. 102730 (Mar. 25, 2025).

2021.” Id. The Comment Letter states that PSERS believes that the Aon error began in
September 2019. Id. The Comment Letter also states that between October 1, 2019, and
December 15, 2023, PSERS paid a total of $2,836,223.78 to Aon. Id.
It is appropriate to extend the Relevant Period because the harm to PSERS caused by
Respondents’ misconduct and misrepresentations was not limited to the period of time of the risk
share return rate calculation and a longer Relevant Period is fair and reasonable. Therefore, the
Commission finds that the Relevant Period shall be extended from July 1, 2020, through March
31, 2021, to July 1, 2020, through to December 31, 2022. 4 A longer Relevant Period will result
in the single harmed client, PSERS, receiving the entirety of the Net Available Fair Fund.
As a result of extending the Relevant Period, the Plan of Allocation in the Plan of
Distribution (Exhibit B) has been edited to clarify that the single client will receive the lesser of
the advisory fees paid by the client plus reasonable interest (as defined by the plan) or the entire
Net Available Fair Fund. The Commission staff believes that aside from the change to the
Relevant Period, no additional changes need to be made, and the Plan is fair and reasonable.
B.

Approval of the Plan of Distribution

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,
that the Plan of Distribution is approved, and the approved Plan of Distribution shall be posted
simultaneously with this order on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
By the Commission.
Vanessa A. Countryman
Secretary

The Commission also changed the term ‘investor’ to ‘client’ throughout the Aon Proposed Plan and Plan of
Allocation for accuracy.

4

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Asec%3A540f743a94d1df56. Public record. Not legal advice.
