# Seeking Public Input on RMBS

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Asec%3A08e6a2a4deaf28ed

## Record

- **Collection:** Agency decision
- **Document type:** Agency decision

## Text

FACT SHEET

Seeking Public Input on RMBS
Disclosure and ABS Registration

On Sept. 26, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a concept release to
solicit public comment on the current SEC rules governing asset-backed securities (ABS),
including residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). RMBS and ABS play an important
role in the U.S. capital markets and the U.S. economy, allowing companies and financial
institutions to access lower-cost capital to make loans to borrowers and finance operations. In
2004, the Commission established a comprehensive registration, disclosure, and ongoing
reporting regulatory framework for RMBS and ABS offerings, with subsequent amendments in
2014.
In light of market trends and developments since the 2014 amendments, the Commission is
soliciting comments on whether the current framework for ABS registration and reporting is
serving the needs of the current ABS market. In particular, the Commission is seeking input
on any steps needed to facilitate more public RMBS offerings and increase liquidity in the
public RMBS market, which could potentially lead to benefits for the U.S. housing market, while
maintaining appropriate investor protections.

Background
Securitization is a method of financing in which financial assets are pooled and converted
into securities, ABS, that may be offered and sold in the capital markets. This method helps
provide companies, including banks and other financial institutions, with access to lowercost capital, enabling them to make loans to borrowers or otherwise finance operations,
facilitating capital formation in critical economic sectors, such as housing and consumer
lending.
In 2004, the Commission adopted Regulation AB, creating a set of specialized registration,
disclosure, and reporting requirements for public ABS offerings and providing the current
definition of “asset-backed security” for purposes of compliance with those requirements.
Following the 2008 financial crisis there was a precipitous decline in public RMBS offerings,
with no public RMBS offerings since 2013. When Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) in 2010, it directed the
Commission to adopt several rules intended to address concerns in the ABS market at the
time, including a lack of transparency about the securities.
•

One of the rules adopted by the Commission in 2014 in response to the Dodd-Frank
Act mandate for increased transparency was a requirement that ABS issuers
disclose standardized information about the underlying assets, such as mortgage
loans underlying publicly offered RMBS. Some of the asset-level disclosure
requirements relate to sensitive information about the mortgage loans underlying
RMBS. To mitigate privacy concerns, the Commission designed certain of these
requirements to anonymize the data.

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

PAGE 1 OF 3

FACT SHEET | Seeking Public Input on RMBS Disclosure and ABS Registration

The Dodd-Frank Act also added a definition of “asset-backed security” in the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The Exchange Act definition is broader than the definition in Regulation
AB.

Highlights of the Concept Release
Recent Developments in Asset-Backed Securities Market
Despite growing interest among ABS market participants for the return of public offerings of
RMBS, RMBS has been issued only through private offerings since 2013. Market
participants often cite the RMBS asset-level disclosure requirements as a key barrier to the
return of RMBS to the public market.
Additionally, market trends and developments in the ABS market more generally, such as
new and expanding types of ABS, have prompted the Commission to assess whether the
existing framework for registration and reporting is serving the needs of the ABS market
today.
Reassessment of RMBS Asset-Level Disclosure Requirements
The concept release solicits public input on whether certain RMBS asset-level disclosure
requirements should be revised and discusses the following general topics:
•

Whether the Commission’s asset-level disclosure requirements adopted in 2014 are
a contributing factor to the absence of publicly offered RMBS;

•

Whether any RMBS asset-level disclosure requirements should be revised,
removed, added, or otherwise modified to (1) better align with market practice and
needs, (2) reduce potential burdens associated with obtaining and disclosing certain
information, or (3) reduce ambiguity in the current requirements;

•

Whether the Commission should consider changing the frequency of certain
disclosures; and

•

Whether the Commission should allow issuers to omit certain information as long as
they identify the omission and provide an explanation.

Potential Disclosure of Certain Sensitive RMBS Asset-Level Information
The concept release solicits public input on whether and how to address potential disclosure
of certain sensitive RMBS asset-level information, including the following issues:
•

Whether it would be appropriate to permit RMBS issuers to provide certain sensitive
information to investors on an issuer-sponsored website, as is current market
practice for privately offered RMBS, and any concerns arising from such an
approach;

•

Whether there are appropriate alternative approaches to providing RMBS investors
with access to sensitive asset-level information; and

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

PAGE 2 OF 3

FACT SHEET | Seeking Public Input on RMBS Disclosure and ABS Registration

•

Whether RMBS issuers should make any representations, undertakings, or
certifications with respect to the sensitive asset-level information.

Reassessment of the Definition of “Asset-Backed Security”
The concept release solicits public comments on whether to revise the definition of “assetbacked security” in Regulation AB to facilitate expanded access to the public ABS market,
as well as whether certain other definitions in Regulation AB should be revised.
The concept release seeks public input on the following:
•

Whether the ABS definition in Regulation AB should be revised to better align with
the Exchange Act definition and, if so, how;

•

Whether such revision would require revisions to other definitions or other
requirements in Regulation AB;

•

The potential impacts to market participants that would result from such revisions;
and

•

Any market trends or developments that the Commission should consider in
connection with such potential changes.

Interested persons are invited to comment on the general and specific questions raised in
the release, as well as on any other aspects of the current framework for registration and
reporting requirements for publicly offered ABS. The Commission also welcomes comments
on any costs, burdens, or benefits that may result from possible regulatory responses related
to the items discussed in the release or otherwise raised by commenters.

What’s Next?
The concept release will be published on the SEC’s website and in the Federal Register. The
comment period will remain open for 60 days.

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

PAGE 3 OF 3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Asec%3A08e6a2a4deaf28ed. Public record. Not legal advice.
