# Bulletin No. 2025–25

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Airs%3A9fedc1a82e568a74

## Record

- **Collection:** Agency decision
- **Document type:** Agency decision

## Text

HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE




Bulletin No. 2025–25
June 16, 2025

These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.

ADMINISTRATIVE
Announcement 2025-14, page 1605.

The OPR announces recent disciplinary sanctions imposed
on attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents,
enrolled actuaries, enrolled retirement plan agents, and
appraisers. The OPR also announces when certain unenrolled, unlicensed tax return preparers (individuals who are
not enrolled to practice before the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) and are not licensed as attorneys or certified public
accountants) have been disciplined. Licensed or enrolled
practitioners are subject to the regulations governing practice before the IRS, which are set out in Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Part 10, and which are released
as Treasury Department Circular No. 230. The regulations
prescribe the duties and restrictions relating to such practice
and prescribe the disciplinary sanctions for violating the regulations. Unenrolled/unlicensed return preparers who choose
to participate in the IRS’s voluntary AFSP are subject to the
guidance in Revenue Procedure 2014-42, which governs a
preparer’s eligibility to represent taxpayers before the IRS
in examinations of tax returns the preparer both prepared
for the taxpayer and signed as the preparer. Additionally,
unenrolled/unlicensed return preparers who participate in
the AFSP agree to be subject to the duties and restrictions in
Circular 230, including the restrictions on incompetence or
disreputable conduct.

EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
Announcement 2025-7, page 1600.

Revocation of IRC 501(c)(3) Organizations for failure to meet
the code section requirements. Contributions made to the
organizations by individual donors are no longer deductible
under IRC 170(b)(1)(A).

Finding Lists begin on page ii.

Announcement 2025-9, page 1601.

The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination
that Ballerina Girl qualifies as an organization described in
sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986. The revocation is effective July 19, 2019.

Announcement 2025-10, page 1602.

Revocation of IRC 501(c)(3) Organizations for failure to meet
the code section requirements. Contributions made to the
organizations by individual donors are no longer deductible
under IRC 170(b)(1)(A).

Announcement 2025-11, page 1603.

The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination
that AFA Grad Inc. qualifies as an organization described
in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986. The revocation is effective November 7,
2019.

Announcement 2025-12, page 1604.

Golconda Foundation Inc. TIN: 73-1552729 has agreed to
the revocation of its IRC Section 501(c)(3) status effective
January 1, 2020.

TAX CONVENTIONS
Announcement 2025-16, page 1609.

The Competent Authorities of the United States of America
and Denmark entered into a Competent Authority Arrangement under paragraph 3 of Article 25 (Mutual Agreement
Procedure) listing the types of pension entities or arrangements established in either Contracting State that will be
treated as a “pension fund” for purposes of paragraph 3(c)
of Article 10 (Dividends), as well as the application of Article
22 (Limitation on Benefits).

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top-quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and
enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all.

Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument
of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service
and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax
Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of
general interest. It is published weekly.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application
of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke,
modify, or amend any of those previously published in the
Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal management are not published; however, statements of
internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and
duties of taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service
on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in
the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices,
identifying details and information of a confidential nature are
deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to
comply with statutory requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned

against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—1986 Code.
This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B,
Legislation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative
Rulings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued
by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant
Secretary (Enforcement).
Part IV.—Items of General Interest.
This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbarment and suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.

The contents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.

June 16, 2025 

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Part IV
Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations, Contributions to Which are
Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code
Announcement 2025-7
The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination that the organizations listed below qualify as organizations described in
sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Generally, the IRS will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the IRS is not precluded from disallowing a
deduction for any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or
determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities
or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed, contributions from individuals and organizations described
in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on
February 03, 2025, and would end on the date the court first determines the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more
particularly set for in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction protected is $1,000, with a husband
and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the
organization that were the basis for revocation.
Name of Organization
Dove Communications, Inc.
Dove Communications, Inc.
Whomentorsdotcom, Inc.
Whomentorsdotcom, Inc.
Center of New Life Philosophy Church & Education

June 16, 2025

Effective Date of Revocation
1/1/2020
1/1/2020
11/7/2019
11/7/2019
1/1/2020

1600

Location
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Marion, IL
San Jose, CA
San Francisco, CA
Akron, OH

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations, Contributions to Which are
Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code
Announcement 2025-9
The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination that the organization listed below qualifies as an organization described
in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Generally, the IRS will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the IRS is not precluded from disallowing a
deduction for any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or
determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities
or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed, contributions from individuals and organizations described
in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on
January 1, 2018 and would end on the date the court first determines the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more
particularly set for in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction protected is $1,000, with a husband
and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the
organization that were the basis for revocation.
The Following organization is no longer qualified as an organization exempt from income tax under Internal Revenue Code (the
“Code”) Section 501(a) as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code:
Name of Organization
Ballerina Girl Inc.

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Effective Date of Revocation
7/29/2019

1601

Location
San Jose CA

June 16, 2025

Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations, Contributions to Which are
Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code
Announcement 2025-10
The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination that the organizations listed below qualify as organizations described in
sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Generally, the IRS will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the IRS is not precluded from disallowing a
deduction for any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or
determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities
or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed, contributions from individuals and organizations described
in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on
February 18, 2025, and would end on the date the court first determines the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more
particularly set for in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction protected is $1,000, with a husband
and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the
organization that were the basis for revocation.
Name of Organization

Effective Date of Revocation
1/01/2020
1/01/2017
1/01/2021
9/01/2019
1/01/2017
1/01/2019
1/01/2021

Praise Place
Live Ministries
Adjusting to Change Lives
Breathing Project Inc.
CA All America Team Inc
Pushmataha County Town of Antlers Hospital Authority
Academy of Fine Art Foundation Inc

June 16, 2025

1602

Location
Kentwood, MI
Rocklin, CA
Pearland, TX
New York, NY
Rocklin, CA
Antler, OK
Anaheim, CA

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations, Contributions to Which are
Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code
Announcement 2025-11
The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination that the organization listed below qualifies as an organization described
in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Generally, the IRS will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the IRS is not precluded from disallowing a
deduction for any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or
determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities
or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed, contributions from individuals and organizations described
in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on
January 1, 2018 and would end on the date the court first determines the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more
particularly set for in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction protected is $1,000, with a husband
and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the
organization that were the basis for revocation.
The Following organization is no longer qualified as an organization exempt from income tax under Internal Revenue Code (the
“Code”) Section 501(a) as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code:
Name of Organization
AFA Grad Inc.

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Effective Date of Revocation
11/7/2019

1603

Location
San Jose CA

June 16, 2025

Deletions From Cumulative List of Organizations, Contributions to Which are
Deductible Under Section 170 of the Code
Announcement 2025-12
The Internal Revenue Service has revoked its determination that the organization listed below qualifies as an organization described
in sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Generally, the IRS will not disallow deductions for contributions made to a listed organization on or before the date of announcement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the IRS is not precluded from disallowing a
deduction for any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling or
determination letter, (2) was aware that such revocation was imminent, or (3) was in part responsible for or was aware of the activities
or omissions of the organization that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed, contributions from individuals and organizations described
in section 170(c)(2) that are otherwise allowable will continue to be deductible. Protection under section 7428(c) would begin on
January 1, 2018, and would end on the date the court first determines the organization is not described in section 170(c)(2) as more
particularly set for in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction protected is $1,000, with a husband
and wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the
organization that were the basis for revocation.
The Following organization is no longer qualified as an organization exempt from income tax under Internal Revenue Code (the
“Code”) Section 501(a) as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code:
Name of Organization
GOLCONDA FOUNDATION INC.

Effective Date of Revocation
1/1/2020

June 16, 2025

1604

Location
JONES, OK

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Announcement of
Disciplinary Sanctions
From the Office of
Professional Responsibility
Announcement 2025-14
The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) announces recent disciplinary
sanctions imposed on attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents,
enrolled actuaries, enrolled retirement
plan agents, and appraisers. The OPR also
announces when certain unenrolled, unlicensed tax return preparers (individuals
who are not enrolled to practice before
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and
are not licensed as attorneys or certified
public accountants) have been disciplined.
Licensed or enrolled practitioners are subject to the regulations governing practice
before the IRS, which are set out in Title
31, Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Part 10, and which are released as
Treasury Department Circular No. 230.
The regulations prescribe the duties and
restrictions relating to such practice and
prescribe the disciplinary sanctions for
violating the regulations. Unenrolled/
unlicensed return preparers who choose to
participate in the IRS’s voluntary Annual
Filing Season Program (AFSP) are subject to the guidance in Revenue Procedure
2014-42, which governs a preparer’s eligibility to represent taxpayers before the
IRS in examinations of tax returns the
preparer both prepared for the taxpayer
and signed as the preparer. Additionally,
unenrolled/unlicensed return preparers
who participate in the AFSP agree to be
subject to the duties and restrictions in
Circular 230, including the restrictions on
incompetence or disreputable conduct.
The disciplinary sanctions imposed for
violation of the applicable standards are:
Disbarred from practice before the
IRS—An individual who is disbarred
is not eligible to practice before the IRS
as defined at 31 C.F.R. § 10.2(a)(4) for a
minimum period of five (5) years and until
reinstated to practice.
Suspended from practice before the
IRS—An individual who is suspended is
not eligible to practice before the IRS as
defined at 31 C.F.R. § 10.2(a)(4) during

Bulletin No. 2025–25

the term of the suspension and until reinstated to practice.
Censured—Censure is a public reprimand. Unlike disbarment or suspension,
censure does not affect an individual’s eligibility to practice before the IRS, but the
OPR may subject the individual’s future
practice rights to conditions designed to
promote high standards of conduct.
Monetary penalty—A monetary penalty may be imposed on an individual who
engages in conduct subject to sanction, or
on an employer, firm, or other entity if the
individual was acting on its behalf and it
knew, or reasonably should have known,
of the individual’s conduct.
Disqualification of appraiser—An
appraiser who is disqualified is barred
from presenting evidence or testimony in
any administrative proceeding before the
Department of the Treasury or the IRS.
Additionally, any appraisal made by the
disqualified appraiser after the effective
date of disqualification will not have any
probative effect in any administrative proceeding before the Treasury Department
or the IRS.
Ineligible for limited practice—An
unenrolled/unlicensed tax return preparer
who participates in the AFSP and who fails
to comply with Circular 230 as required
by Revenue Procedure 2014-42 may have
their AFSP credential revoked and may be
determined ineligible to engage in future
limited practice under the program as a
representative of a taxpayer.
Under the regulations, individuals
subject to Circular 230 may not assist, or
accept assistance from, individuals who
are suspended or disbarred with respect
to matters constituting practice (i.e., representation) before the IRS, and they may
not aid or abet suspended or disbarred
individuals to practice before the IRS.
Disciplinary sanctions are described in
these terms:
Disbarred by decision, Suspended by
decision, Censured by decision, Monetary penalty imposed by decision, and
Disqualified by decision (including after
a hearing)—An administrative law judge
(ALJ), upon the OPR’s complaint alleging violation of the regulations, issued a
decision imposing one of these sanctions
after the ALJ either (1) granted the government’s motion for summary adjudication or (2) after conducting an evidentiary

1605

hearing. After 30 days from the issuance
of the decision, in the absence of an
appeal, the ALJ’s decision becomes the
final agency decision.
Disbarred by default decision, Suspended by default decision, Censured
by default decision, Monetary penalty imposed by default decision, and
Disqualified by default decision—An
ALJ, after finding that no answer to the
OPR’s complaint was filed or timely filed,
granted the OPR’s motion for a default
judgment and issued a decision imposing
one of these sanctions.
Disbarred by decision on appeal,
Suspended by decision on appeal, Censured by decision on appeal, Monetary penalty imposed by decision on
appeal, and Disqualified by decision
on appeal—The decision of the ALJ was
appealed to the agency’s appellate authority, acting as the delegate of the Secretary
of the Treasury, and the appellate authority issued a decision imposing one of these
sanctions.
Disbarred by consent, Suspended by
consent, Censured by consent, Monetary penalty imposed by consent, and
Disqualified by consent—In lieu of a
disciplinary proceeding being instituted or
continued, an individual offered their consent to one of these sanctions (or a firm or
other entity offered to consent to a monetary penalty) and the OPR accepted the
offer and the parties entered into a consent
agreement. Typically, an offer of consent
will provide for: suspension for an indefinite term; conditions that the individual
must observe during the suspension; and
the individual’s opportunity, after a stated
number of months, to file with the OPR
a petition for reinstatement affirming
compliance with the terms of the consent
agreement and affirming current fitness
and eligibility to practice (i.e., an active
professional license or active enrollment
status, with no intervening violations of
the regulations).
Suspended indefinitely by decision
in expedited proceeding, Suspended
indefinitely by default decision in expedited proceeding—The OPR instituted
an expedited proceeding for suspension
(based on certain limited grounds, including loss of a professional license for cause,
and criminal convictions) that resulted in
suspension.

June 16, 2025

Determined ineligible for limited
practice—There has been a final determination under Revenue Procedure 2014-42
that an unenrolled/unlicensed tax return
preparer is not eligible for continued limited representation of taxpayers because
the preparer violated standards of conduct prescribed in Circular 230 or failed
to comply with any of the requirements
described in the revenue procedure.
A practitioner who has been disbarred
or suspended under 31 C.F.R. § 10.60, or
suspended under § 10.82, or a disqualified
appraiser may petition for reinstatement
before the IRS after the expiration of 5
years following such disbarment, suspension, or disqualification (or immediately
following the expiration of the suspension
or disqualification period if shorter than 5
years). Reinstatement will not be granted

unless the IRS is satisfied that the petitioner is not likely to engage thereafter in
conduct contrary to Circular 230, and that
granting such reinstatement would not be
contrary to the public interest.
Reinstatement decisions are published
at the individual’s request, and described
in these terms:
Reinstated to practice before the
IRS—The OPR granted the individual’s
petition for reinstatement. The individual
is eligible to practice before the IRS, or in
the case of an appraiser, the individual is
no longer disqualified.
The OPR has authority to disclose the
grounds for disciplinary sanctions in these
situations: (1) an ALJ or the Secretary’s
delegate on appeal has issued a final decision imposing a sanction; (2) the individual
has settled a disciplinary case by signing

the OPR’s consent-to-sanction agreement
admitting to one or more violations of the
regulations and consenting to the disclosure of the admitted violations (for example, willful failure to file Federal income
tax returns, lack of due diligence, conflict
of interest, etc.); (3) that the OPR has
issued a decision in an expedited proceeding for indefinite suspension; or (4) upon a
final determination (including any decision
on appeal) that an unenrolled/unlicensed
return preparer is no longer eligible to represent taxpayers before the IRS under Revenue Procedure 2014-42.
Announcements of disciplinary sanctions appear in the Internal Revenue Bulletin at the earliest practicable date. The
sanctions announced below are alphabetized first by state and second by the last
names of the sanctioned individuals.

City & State

Name

Professional
Designation

Disciplinary Sanction

Effective Date(s)

California
Agoura Hills

Fulton, William E.

Enrolled Agent

Indefinite from
March 18, 2025

Westlake Village

Englander, Mark L.

CPA

Westlake Village

Knauss III, Walter W.

CPA

Suspended by consent for
admitted violations of
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)(2)
Suspended by consent for
admitted violations of
31 C.F.R. § 10.51(a)(6)
Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Connecticut
Berlin

Schwartz, Scott M.

Attorney

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
March 18, 2025

Tampa

Kalish, William

Attorney

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
October 21, 2024

Georgia
Duluth

Tuggle, Nevada M.

Attorney

Indefinite from
March 18, 2025

Forest Park

Tomasello, William B.

CPA

Woodstock

Smith, Victor C.

CPA

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)
Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)
Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
October 1, 2024
Indefinite from
December 4, 2024

Florida

June 16, 2025

1606

Indefinite from
January 21, 2025
Indefinite from
January 21, 2025

Bulletin No. 2025–25

City & State

Name

Professional
Designation

Disciplinary Sanction

Effective Date(s)

Hawaii
Hilo

Slone, Michele K.

Enrolled Agent

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
March 18, 2025

Illinois
Champaign

Peek, Matthew E.

Attorney

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
March 18, 2025

Indiana
Modoc

Harman, Michael M.

CPA

Indefinite from
November 20, 2024

Seymour

Smith, Jason M.

Attorney

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)
Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Massachusetts
Burlington

Kim, Christine K.

Enrolled Agent

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
November 20, 2024

Mississippi
Raymond

Gordon, Charisse C.

Attorney

Suspended by decision in
expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
February 18, 2025

Missouri
Saint Joseph

Tillmon III, William R.

CPA

Indefinite from
November 10, 2024

Saint Louis

Chollet, Catherine E.

Attorney

Suspended by consent for
admitted violations of
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)
Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

New York
Bronx

Johnson, Kimberly

CPA

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
November 14, 2024

New City

Klein, Mitchell L.

CPA

Scarsdale

Sanossian, George O.

CPA

North Carolina
Fayetteville

Cooper Jr., Willie

CPA

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
October 21, 2024

Indefinite from
March 27, 2025

Reinstated to
practice before the
IRS, effective July
22, 2024
Indefinite from
March 11, 2025

Reinstated to
practice before
the IRS, effective
January 8, 2025

1607

June 16, 2025

City & State

Name

Professional
Designation

Disciplinary Sanction

Effective Date(s)

Oregon
Portland

Magee, Peter J.

CPA

Suspended by decision in
expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
January 21, 2025

Pennsylvania
Punxsutawney

Stello, Michael A.

CPA

Suspended by consent for
admitted violations of
31 C.F.R. § 10.51(a)(6)

Indefinite from
February 28, 2025

Texas
Dallas, TX

Malphurs, Robert A.

CPA

Indefinite from
December 4, 2024

Mansfield

Castro, John A.

Enrolled Agent

San Antonio

Schmitz, Keith M.

Enrolled Agent

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)
Suspended by decision in
expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)
Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

West Virginia
Harpers Ferry, WV

Jordan, George W.

CPA

Suspended by default decision
in expedited proceeding under
31 C.F.R. § 10.82(b)

Indefinite from
December 4, 2024

June 16, 2025

1608

Indefinite from
March 27, 2025
Indefinite from
March 11, 2025

Bulletin No. 2025–25

U.S.-Denmark Competent Authority Arrangement
Announcement 2025-16
The following is a copy of the Competent Authority Arrangement entered into by the competent authorities of the United States of
America and the Kingdom of Denmark under paragraph 3 of Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure) of the Convention between
the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income signed at Washington on August 19, 1999, as amended
by the protocol signed at Copenhagen on May 2, 2006, with respect to the types of pension entities or arrangements established in
either Contracting State that will be treated as a “pension fund” for purposes of paragraph 3(c) of Article 10 (Dividends), as well as
the application of Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits).
The text of the Competent Authority Arrangement is as follows:
COMPETENT AUTHORITY ARRANGEMENT
The competent authorities of the United States and Denmark hereby enter into the following arrangement (the “Arrangement”)
regarding the types of pension entities or arrangements established in either Contracting State that will be treated as a “pension fund”
for purposes of paragraph 3(c) of Article 10 (Dividends), as well as the application of Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits) of the Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark for the Avoidance
of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income signed at Washington on August 19, 1999
(the “Treaty”), as amended by the protocol signed at Copenhagen on May 2, 2006 to those entities or arrangements. This Arrangement
is entered into under paragraph 3 of Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure).
It is understood for purposes of this Arrangement that the term “Article” refers to an Article of the Treaty.
Qualification for benefits under Article 10(3)
Article 10(3)(c) provides that dividends shall not be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is
a resident if the beneficial owner is a pension fund, which is described in subparagraph e) of paragraph 2 of Article 22 (Limitation
of Benefits), that is a resident of the other Contracting State, provided that such dividends are not derived from the carrying on of a
business by the pension fund or through an associated enterprise.
Article 22(2)(e) provides that a resident of a Contracting State shall be entitled to all the benefits of this Convention only if such
resident is a legal person, whether or not exempt from tax, organized under the laws of a Contracting State to provide a pension or
other similar benefits to employees, including self-employed individuals, pursuant to a plan, provided that more than 50 percent of
the person’s beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals resident in either Contracting State.
The competent authorities agree the term “pension fund” as defined in paragraph 3(c) of Article 10 (Dividends) by reference to legal
persons described in paragraph 2(e) of Article 22 (Limitation on Benefits) includes the following, for the purposes of both paragraphs:
1. Danish pension funds:
Provided that, with the exception of pension entities or arrangements described in paragraph (b) below, more than 50 percent of the
person’s beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals resident in either Denmark or the United States:
a)

Pension institutions liable to taxation under Section 1 (2), of the Danish Pension Investment Return Tax Act.

b) Account Holding Investment Funds under Section 2 in the Account Holding Investments Funds tax act provided that it is operated exclusively or almost exclusively to earn income for the benefit of persons described in paragraph 1. (a) above that are
themselves entitled to benefits under the Treaty as a resident of Denmark.
2. U.S pension funds:
Provided that, with the exception of pension entities or arrangements described in paragraph (j) below, more than 50 percent of the
person’s beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals resident in either the United States or Denmark:

Bulletin No. 2025–25

1609

June 16, 2025

a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)

A trust providing pension or retirement benefits under an Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) section 401(a) qualified pension plan
(which includes a Code section 401(k) plan) and a profit sharing or stock bonus plan;
A Code section 403(a) qualified annuity plan;
A Code section 403(b) plan,
A trust that is an individual retirement account under Code section 408;
A Roth individual retirement account under Code section 408A;
A simple retirement account under Code section 408(p);
A trust providing pension or retirement benefits under a simplified employee pension plan under Code section 408(k);
A trust described in Code section 457(g) providing pension or retirement benefits under a Code section 457(b) plan;
The Thrift Savings Fund (Code section 7701(j)); and
A group trust described in Revenue Ruling 81-100, as amended by Revenue Ruling 2014-24 and Revenue Ruling 2011-1, but
only if it is operated exclusively or almost exclusively to earn income for the benefit of persons described in paragraphs 2.(a)
through 2.(i) that are themselves entitled to benefits under the Treaty as a resident of the United States.

Any U.S. or Danish pension entity or arrangement of a type not mentioned above, including any type of pension entity or arrangement
established pursuant to legislation enacted after the date of signature of this Arrangement, or any participant in a type of plan not
mentioned above, may present its case to the U.S. and Danish Competent Authorities pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 25 (Mutual
Agreement Procedure) for a determination of whether the pension entity or arrangement is considered a pension fund eligible for
benefits under paragraph 3(c) of Article 10, provided it has also satisfied all additional applicable requirements set forth in the Treaty.
Effective Date
Upon signature by the U.S. and Danish competent authorities, this Arrangement is effective for dividends paid on or after February
1, 2008.
Signed by the undersigned competent authorities:

/s/ Holly O. Paz
Holly O. Paz
United States Competent Authority

/s/ Helene Holmen
Helene Holmen
Head of Office,
Danish Competent Authority in non-TP cases

Date: March 18, 2025

Date: March 25, 2025

June 16, 2025

1610

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the
­effect:
Amplified describes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior published position, but the prior position is
being extended to apply to a variation of
the fact situation set forth therein. Thus,
if an earlier ruling held that a principle
applied to A, and the new ruling holds that
the same principle also applies to B, the
earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare with
modified, below).
Clarified is used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is
being made clear because the language
has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a
prior ruling is being changed.
Distinguished describes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously published ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modified is used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the

new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
with amplified and clarified, above).
Obsoleted describes a previously published ruling that is not considered determinative with respect to future transactions.
This term is most commonly used in a ruling
that lists previously published rulings that
are obsoleted because of changes in laws or
regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted
because the substance has been included in
regulations subsequently adopted.
Revoked describes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
being stated in a new ruling.
Superseded describes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than
restate the substance and situation of a
previously published ruling (or rulings).
Thus, the term is used to republish under
the 1986 Code and regulations the same
position published under the 1939 Code
and regulations. The term is also used
when it is desired to republish in a single
ruling a series of situations, names, etc.,
that were previously published over a
period of time in separate rulings. If the

new ruling does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of
terms is used. For example, modified and
superseded describes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is
self contained. In this case, the previously
published ruling is first modified and then,
as modified, is superseded.
Supplemented is used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names
in subsequent rulings. After the original
ruling has been supplemented several
times, a new ruling may be published that
includes the list in the original ruling and
the additions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series.
Suspended is used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rulings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.

Abbreviations
The following abbreviations in
current use and formerly
used will appear in material
published in the Bulletin.

A—Individual.
Acq.—Acquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Cooperative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decedent.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.

Bulletin No. 2025–25

ER—Employer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduciary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Foreign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grantee.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insurance Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Personal Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.

i

PRS—Partnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsidiary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Transferee.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpayer.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—United States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporation.

June 16, 2025

Numerical Finding List1
Bulletin 2025–25

Announcements:
2025-2, 2025-2 I.R.B. 305
2025-3, 2025-2 I.R.B. 306
2025-4, 2025-2 I.R.B. 306
2025-1, 2025-3 I.R.B. 431
2025-5, 2025-3 I.R.B. 433
2025-6, 2025-5 I.R.B. 526
2025-8, 2025-13 I.R.B. 1384
2025-13, 2025-15 I.R.B. 1392
2025-15, 2025-18 I.R.B. 1420
2025-7, 2025-25 I.R.B. 1600
2025-9, 2025-25 I.R.B. 1601
2025-10, 2025-25 I.R.B. 1602
2025-11, 2025-25 I.R.B. 1603
2025-12, 2025-25 I.R.B. 1604
2025-14, 2025-25 I.R.B. 1605
2025-16, 2025-25 I.R.B. 1609

Notices:
2025-1, 2025-3 I.R.B. 415
2025-2, 2025-3 I.R.B. 418
2025-4, 2025-3 I.R.B. 419
2025-5, 2025-3 I.R.B. 426
2025-3, 2025-4 I.R.B. 488
2025-7, 2025-5 I.R.B. 524
2025-9, 2025-6 I.R.B. 681
2025-10, 2025-6 I.R.B. 682
2025-11, 2025-6 I.R.B. 704
2025-13, 2025-6 I.R.B. 710
2025-6, 2025-8 I.R.B. 799
2025-8, 2025-8 I.R.B. 800
2025-12, 2025-8 I.R.B. 813
2025-14, 2025-10 I.R.B. 980
2025-15, 2025-11 I.R.B. 1089
2025-16, 2025-13 I.R.B. 1378
2025-17, 2025-14 I.R.B. 1387
2025-18, 2025-16 I.R.B. 1416
2025-19, 2025-17 I.R.B. 1418
2025-20, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1423
2025-21, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1424
2025-22, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1427
2025-23, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1428
2025-24, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1429
2025-25, 2025-20 I.R.B. 1445
2025-26, 2025-20 I.R.B. 1445
2025-29, 2025-20 I.R.B. 1445

Proposed Regulations:
REG-117213-24, 2025-3 I.R.B. 433
REG-134420-10, 2025-4 I.R.B. 513
REG-105479-18, 2025-5 I.R.B. 527
REG-116610-20, 2025-5 I.R.B. 638
REG-115560-23, 2025-6 I.R.B. 716

Proposed Regulations:—Continued
REG-123525-23, 2025-6 I.R.B. 726
REG-124930-21, 2025-7 I.R.B. 772
REG‑100669‑24, 2025-8 I.R.B. 819
REG-101268-24, 2025-8 I.R.B. 836
REG-107420-24, 2025-8 I.R.B. 854
REG-116085-23, 2025-8 I.R.B. 865
REG-118988-22, 2025-8 I.R.B. 869
REG-107895-24, 2025-9 I.R.B. 972
REG-110878-24, 2025-9 I.R.B. 979
REG-112261-24, 2025-10 I.R.B. 983

10022, 2025-8 I.R.B. 773
10026, 2025-9 I.R.B. 878
10027, 2025-9 I.R.B. 897
10029, 2025-9 I.R.B. 936
10030, 2025-11 I.R.B. 1066
10024, 2025-12 I.R.B. 1104
10023, 2025-13 I.R.B. 1259

Revenue Procedures:
2025-1, 2025-1 I.R.B. 1
2025-2, 2025-1 I.R.B. 118
2025-3, 2025-1 I.R.B. 142
2025-4, 2025-1 I.R.B. 158
2025-5, 2025-1 I.R.B. 260
2025-7, 2025-1 I.R.B. 301
2025-8, 2025-3 I.R.B. 427
2025-9, 2025-4 I.R.B. 491
2025-10, 2025-4 I.R.B. 492
2025-11, 2025-4 I.R.B. 501
2025-12, 2025-4 I.R.B. 512
2025-6, 2025-6 I.R.B. 713
2025-14, 2025-7 I.R.B. 770
2025-13, 2025-8 I.R.B. 816
2025-15, 2025-11 I.R.B. 1090
2025-16, 2025-11 I.R.B. 1100
2025-17, 2025-13 I.R.B. 1382
2025-18, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1430
2025-19, 2025-21 I.R.B. 1447
2025-20, 2025-22 I.R.B. 1448
2025-21, 2025-22 I.R.B. 1448
2025-23, 2025-24 I.R.B. 1476

Revenue Rulings:
2025-1, 2025-3 I.R.B. 307
2025-2, 2025-3 I.R.B. 309
2025-3, 2025-4 I.R.B. 443
2025-4, 2025-7 I.R.B. 758
2025-5, 2025-7 I.R.B. 767
2025-6, 2025-11 I.R.B. 1064
2025-7, 2025-13 I.R.B. 1239
2025-8, 2025-15 I.R.B. 1390
2025-9, 2025-16 I.R.B. 1415
2025-10, 2025-19 I.R.B. 1421
2025-11, 2025-23 I.R.B. 1451
2025-12, 2025-23 I.R.B. 1471

Treasury Decisions:
10016, 2025-3 I.R.B. 313
10020, 2025-3 I.R.B. 408
10018, 2025-4 I.R.B. 446
10019, 2025-4 I.R.B. 482
10017, 2025-5 I.R.B. 517
10028, 2025-6 I.R.B. 660

A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2024–27 through 2024–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2024–52, dated December 23, 2024.
1

June 16, 2025

ii

Bulletin No. 2025–25

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items1
Bulletin 2025–25

A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2024–27 through 2024–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2024–52, dated December 23, 2024.
1

Bulletin No. 2025–25

iii

June 16, 2025

Internal Revenue Service
Washington, DC 20224
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use, $300

INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN

The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue
Bulletins are available at www.irs.gov/irb/.

We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin

If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it,
we would be pleased to hear from you. You can email us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page
www.irs.gov) or write to the Internal Revenue Service, Publishing Division, IRB Publishing Program Desk, 1111 Constitution Ave.
NW, IR-6230 Washington, DC 20224.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Airs%3A9fedc1a82e568a74. Public record. Not legal advice.
