# Friday, November 21, 2014

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Aftc%3Aea551dfecab7ca7f

## Record

- **Collection:** Agency decision
- **Document type:** Agency decision

## Text

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

16 CFR Ch. I

Semiannual Regulatory Agenda

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.

SUMMARY: The following agenda of Commission proceedings is published in accordance with section
22(d)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 57b-3(d)(1), and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 to 612, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
The Commission’s agenda follows guidelines and procedures issued August 25, 2014, by the Office of
Management and Budget in accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866 “Regulatory
Planning and Review” of September 30, 1993, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993), as incorporated in Executive
Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,” 76 FR 3821 (Jan. 18, 2011) and Executive
Order 13579 “Regulation and Independent Regulatory Agencies” (July 11, 2011).

This edition of the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions includes The
Regulatory Plan, which appears in both the online Unified Agenda and in part II of the Federal Register
that includes the Unified Agenda. The Commission’s Statement of Regulatory Priorities is included in the
Plan. The Commission has no proposed rules that would be a “significant regulatory action” under the
definition in Executive Order 12866.

The complete Unified Agenda will be available online at www.reginfo.gov, in a format that offers
users a greatly enhanced ability to obtain information from the agenda database. The RFA requires
publication in the Federal Register for rules that are in the Agency’s regulatory flexibility agenda, because

1

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

they are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities (5 USC 602)
and any rules that the Agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the RFA. For fall
2014, the Commission has no proposed rules that would be required to be published in the Federal
Register by the RFA’s agenda requirements.

The Commission’s agenda also references the website www.regulations.gov where appropriate.
This is the Government-wide website where members of the public can find, review, and submit
comments on Federal rulemakings that are open for comment and published in the Federal Register.

The Commission has responded to the optional information requirement to identify rulemakings
that are likely to have some impact on small entities but are not subject to the requirements of the RFA.
The current rulemakings that are likely to have some impact on small entities but are not subject to the
requirements of the RFA are: (1) Rules and Regulations Under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939,
16 CFR 300; (2) Fur Products Labeling Act Rules, 16 CFR 301; (3) Rules and Regulations Under the
Hobby Protection Act, 16 CFR 304; (4) the Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR 305; (5) the Automotive Fuel
Ratings, Certification, and Posting Rule, 16 CFR 306; (6) Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR 310; (7)
Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information, 16 CFR 314; (8) Contact Lens Rule, 16 CFR 315; (9)
CAN–SPAM Rule, 16 CFR 316; (10) Care Labeling of Textile Apparel and Certain Piece Goods as
Amended, 16 CFR 423; (11) Retail Food Store Advertising and Marketing Practices, 16 CFR 424; (12) the
Negative Option Rule, 16 CFR 425; (13) the Cooling-Off Rule, 16 CFR 429; (14) the Holder-in-DueCourse Rule, 16 CFR 433; (15) Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule, 16 CFR 435; (16) the Used
Car Rule, 16 CFR 455; (17) Ophthalmic Practice Rules (Eyeglass Rule), 16 CFR 456; (18) the Fair
Packaging and Labeling Act Regulations, 16 CFR 500-502; (19) Disclosure of Written Consumer Product
Warranty Terms and Conditions, 16 CFR 701; (20) Pre-Sale Availability of Written Warranty Terms, 16
CFR 702; and (21) Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures, 16 CFR 703.

2

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

In addition, the Agency has responded to the optional information question that corresponds to
Executive Order 13132, “Federalism,” of August 4, 1999, 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999), which does not
apply to independent regulatory agencies. The Commission believes to the extent that any of the rules in
this agenda may have “substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of Government” within the meaning of Executive Order 13132, it has consulted with the affected entities.
The Commission continues to work closely with the States and other governmental units in its rulemaking
process, which explicitly considers the effect of the Agency’s rules on these governmental entities.

Some of the rulemakings listed in the agenda are being conducted as part of the Commission's
plan to review and seek information every 10 years about all of its regulations and guides, including their
costs and benefits and regulatory and economic impact. These reviews incorporate and expand upon the
review required by the RFA and regulatory reform initiatives directing agencies to conduct a review of all
regulations and eliminate or revise those that are outdated or otherwise in need of reform.

Except for notice of completed actions, the information in this agenda represents the judgment of
Commission staff, based upon information now available. Each projected date of action reflects an
assessment by the FTC staff of the likelihood that the specified event will occur during the coming year.
No final determination by the staff or the Commission respecting the need for or the substance of a trade
regulation rule or any other procedural option should be inferred from the notation of projected events in
this agenda. In most instances, the dates of future events are listed by month, not by a specific day. The
acquisition of new information, changes of circumstances, or changes in the law may alter this
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about specific regulatory actions listed in the
agenda, call, email, or write the contact person listed for each particular proceeding. General comments

3

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

or questions about the agenda should be directed to G. Richard Gold; Attorney, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, telephone: (202) 326-3355; email:
rgold@ftc.gov.

By direction of the Commission.
NAME: Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.

4

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

The 23 Regulatory Agendas

Federal Trade Commission - PreRule
Regulation
Identifier
Number

Title
Regulatory Review

3084-AA47

Retail Food Store Advertising and Marketing Practices

3084-AB22

Rule Governing Disclosure of Written Consumer Product Warranty Terms and Conditions

3084-AB24

Rule Governing the Pre -Sale Availability of Written Warranty Terms

3084-AB25

Rule Governing Informal Dispute Settlement Procedure

3084-AB26

Fair Packaging and Labeling Act Regulations

3084-AB33

Rules and Regulations Under the Hobby Protection Act

3084-AB34

Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information

3084-AB35

Contact Lens Rule

3084-AB36

Trade Regulation Rule on Ophthalmic Practice Rule

3084-AB37

Federal Trade Commission - Proposed Rule
Regulation
Identifier
Number

Title
Used Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation Rule

3084-AB05

Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Cooling-Off Period for Sales Made at Homes or at Certain Other Locations

3084-AB10

Rule Concerning Energy And Water Use Labeling For Consumer Products

3084-AB15

Telemarketing Sales Rule

3084-AB19

Care Labeling of Textile Apparel and Certain Piece Goods as Amended

3084-AB28

Premerger Notification Rules and Report Form

3084-AB32

Automotive Fuel Ratings, Certification and Posting

3084-AB39

Federal Trade Commission - Final Rule
Regulation
Identifier
Number

Title
Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule

3084-AB07

Rules and Regulations Under the Fur Products Labeling Act

3084-AB27

Federal Trade Commission - Long-term Action
Regulation
Identifier
Number

Title
Preservation of Consumers' Claims and Defenses (Holder-in -Due-Course Rule)

3084-AB16

CAN -SPAM Rule

3084-AB38
Federal Trade Commission - Completed Action
Regulation
Identifier
Number

Title
Use of Prenotification Negative Option Plans

3084-AB13

Rules and Regulations Under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939

3084-AB29

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AA47

5

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda
View Related Documents

Title: Regulatory Review
Abstract: The Commission continues its review of current rules and guides to identify any that should be modified or rescinded.
No determination about whether to modify or rescind a rule, guide, or interpretation or any other procedural option should be
inferred from the Commission's decision to publish a request for comments. In certain instances, the reviews may also address
other specific matters or issues, such as proposed amendments. Finally, the Commission may modify the rule review timetable
as circumstances warrant. On March 13, 2014, the Commission published its current rule and guide review schedule for 2014.
79 FR 14199. The Commission is also seeking input on ways to improve its regulatory review program and the procedure used
for reviewing the Agency's rules and guides. Through comments suggesting improvements to its systematic regulatory review,
the Commission seeks to ensure it is implementing a review process that accurately measures the effectiveness, efficiency, and
consequences of its rules and guides in the face of changing marketplace conditions, evolving consumer behavior, and
technological developments. Staff reviews comments as they are received.
Priority: Other Significant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 1 et seq (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

FR Cite

Notice of Rules and Guides To Review in 2000

01/19/2000

65 FR 2912

Notice of Rules and Guides To Review in 2002

03/04/2002

67 FR 9630

Notice of Rules and Guides To Review in 2003

01/17/2003

68 FR 2465

Notice of Rules and Guides To Review in 2004

01/27/2004

69 FR 3867

Notice of Rules and Guides To Review in 2005

01/12/2005

70 FR 2074

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2006

12/29/2005

70 FR 77077

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2007

12/29/2006

71 FR 78390

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2008

03/05/2008

73 FR 11844

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2009

02/05/2009

74 FR 6129

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2010

03/17/2010

75 FR 12715

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2011

07/13/2011

76 FR 41150

Comment Period Closed (Regulatory Review)

09/06/2011

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2012

04/13/2012

77 FR 22234

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2013

05/23/2013

78 FR 30798

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2014

03/31/2014

79 FR 14199

Notice of Rules and Guides to Review in 2015

04/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
Agency Contact: Jock K Chung
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2984
E-Mail: jchung@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB22
View Related Documents

Title: Retail Food Store Advertising and Marketing Practices
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on August 18, 2011, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Unavailability Rule (or the Rule on Retail Food Store Advertising and Marketing Practices) by publishing a notice
seeking public comments on the effectiveness and impact of the rule. 76 FR 51308. The comment period closed on October 19,
2011. Staff has reviewed the comments and expects to submit a recommendation to the Commission by the winter of 2015. The
Commission's Unavailability Rule states that it is a violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for food retailers
to advertise products for sale at a stated price if those stores do not have the advertised products in stock and readily available
to customers during the effective period of the advertisement, unless the advertisement clearly discloses that supplies of the
advertised products are limited or are available only at some outlets. However, it is not a violation of the rule if the advertised
products were ordered in adequate time for delivery in quantities sufficient to meet reasonably anticipated demand, the food

6

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

retailer offers a "raincheck" for the advertised products, the food retailer offers at the advertised price or at a comparable price
reduction a similar product that is at least comparable in value to the advertised product, or the food retailer offers other
compensation at least equal to the advertised value. The rule is intended to benefit consumers by ensuring that advertised items
are available, that advertising-induced purchasing trips are not fruitless, and that store prices accurately reflect the prices
appearing in the ads.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: Undetermined
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 424 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

08/18/2011

Staff Recommendation to Commission

02/00/2015

FR Cite
76 FR 51308

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA17
Agency Contact: Jock K Chung
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2984
E-Mail: jchung@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB24

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Rule Governing Disclosure of Written Consumer Product Warranty Terms and Conditions
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on August 23, 2011, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Consumer Warranty Rule (or the Rule Governing the Disclosure of Written Consumer Product Warranty Terms and
Conditions) (Rule 701) by publishing a notice seeking public comments on the effectiveness and impact of the rule. 76 FR
52596. The comment period closed on October 24, 2011. Staff anticipates sending a recommendation to the Commission by the
fall of 2014. The Consumer Warranty Rule establishes requirements for warrantors for disclosing the terms and conditions of
written warranties on consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $15.00. Rule 701 specifies the information
that must appear in the written warranty, as well as the exact language that must be used for certain disclosures. Under Rule
701, the information must be disclosed in simple, easily understood, and concise language in a single document. In addition to
specifying the information that must appear in a written warranty, Rule 701 also requires that, in instances where the warrantor
uses a warranty registration or owner registration card, the warranty must disclose whether that registration card is a condition
precedent to warranty coverage. Finally, it provides that, in connection with some "seal of approval" programs, the disclosures
do not have to be given in the actual seal itself, if they are made in a publication with a general circulation.
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Major: No
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 701 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

08/23/2011

Recommendation to Commission

11/00/2014

FR Cite
76 FR 52596

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.

7

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA72
Agency Contact: Svetlana S Gans
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-8528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-3708
E-Mail: sgans@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB25
View Related Documents

Title: Rule Governing the Pre-Sale Availability of Written Warranty Terms
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on August 23, 2011, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Pre-Sale Availability Rule (or Rule Governing the Pre-Sale Availability of Written Warranty Terms) (Rule 702) by
publishing a notice seeking public comments on the effectiveness and impact of the rule. 76 FR 52595. The comment period
closed on October 24, 2011. Staff anticipates sending a recommendation to the Commission by the fall of 2014. The Pre-Sale
Availability Rule was published as a final rule in 1975 and most recently amended in 1987. Section 102(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. 2301 et seq., directed the Commission to prescribe rules requiring that the terms of
any written warranty on a consumer product be made available to the consumer or prospective consumer prior to the sale of
the product. Accordingly, the Commission issued Rule 702, which requires sellers and warrantors to make the terms of a written
warranty available to the consumer prior to sale. Among other things, the rule requires sellers to make warranties readily
available by either (1) displaying the warranty document in close proximity to the product, or (2) furnishing the warranty
document on request and posting signs in prominent locations advising consumers that warranty information is available. The
rule requires warrantors to provide materials to enable sellers to comply with the rule's requirements. It also sets out the
methods by which warranty information can be made available prior to the sale of the product in instances where the product is
sold through catalogs, mail order, or door-to-door.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 702 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

08/23/2011

Recommendation to Commission

11/00/2014

FR Cite
76 FR 52596

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA73
Agency Contact: Svetlana S Gans
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-8528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-3708
E-Mail: sgans@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB26

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Rule Governing Informal Dispute Settlement Procedure
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on August 23, 2011, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Rule Governing Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures (Rule 703) by publishing a notice seeking public

8

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

comments on the effectiveness and impact of the rule. 76 FR 52596. The comment period closed on October 24, 2011. Staff
anticipates sending a recommendation to the Commission by the fall of 2014. Rule 703 establishes minimum requirements for
those informal dispute settlement mechanisms (IDSM) that are incorporated by the warrantor into its consumer product warranty.
By incorporating the IDSM into the warranty, the warrantor requires the consumer to use the IDSM before pursuing any legal
remedies in court. Among other things, the rule sets out the mechanism's structure, the qualifications of decision makers, the
procedures for resolving disputes, and recordkeeping requirements of such IDSMs. The rule also prescribes the duties of the
warrantor in making consumers aware of the IDSM and how to use it, as well as the warrantor's duties to comply with the
IDSM's requests and decisions. The rule also requires IDSMs that operate under Rule 703 to submit annual audits to the
Federal Trade Commission to determine their compliance with the rule.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Major: Undetermined
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 703 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

08/23/2011

Recommendation to Commission

11/00/2014

FR Cite
76 FR 52596

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA75
Agency Contact: Svetlana S Gans
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-8528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-3708
E-Mail: sgans@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB33

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Fair Packaging and Labeling Act Regulations
Abstract: As part of its ongoing systematic review of all Federal Trade Commission rules and guides, the Commission
requested comments March 19, 2014, regarding, among other things, the economic impact and benefits of the Fair Packaging
and Labeling Act (FPLA) Rules; possible conflict between the rules and State, local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and
the effect on the rules of any technological, economic, or other industry changes. The comment period closed on May 21, 2014.
Staff is reviewing the comments and anticipates forwarding a recommendation to the Commission by the end of 2014. The
FPLA requires consumer commodities to be marked with statements of: (1) identity; (2) net quantity of contents; and (3) name
and place of the business of manufacturer, packer, or distributor. These requirements serve FPLA's stated purpose of "enabling
consumers to obtain accurate information as to the quantity of the contents and ... to facilitate value comparisons." The FTC is
responsible for FPLA enforcement regarding all consumer commodities other than foods, drugs, and cosmetics, and pursuant to
section 6(b) of FPLA, the Commission promulgated the implementing regulations found in 16 CFR parts 500, 501, 502, and 503.
Pursuant to 1992 amendments to the FPLA, the Commission has amended these regulations to require the use of the units of
both the customary inch/pound measurement system and the metric measurement system in the net quantity statement for
certain consumer commodities. The amended regulations became effective on February 14, 1994.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Major: Undetermined
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 500; 16 CFR 501; 16 CFR 502; 16 CFR 503 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal
Regulations )
Legal Authority: Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, 15 USC 1451
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

9

FR Cite

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

ANPRM

03/19/2014

ANPRM Comment Period End

05/21/2014

Recommendation to Commission

12/00/2014

Unified Agenda
79 FR 15272

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA46
Agency Contact: Doug Wolfe
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-3113
E-Mail: dwolfe@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB34

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Rules and Regulations Under the Hobby Protection Act
Abstract: The Hobby Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. sections 2101 to 2106, prohibits manufacturing or importing imitation
numismatic and collectible political items unless they are marked in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Federal Trade
Commission. The implementing rules (or rule), which became effective on February 6, 1975, prescribe the required markings on
imitation political and numismatic items, specifying the sizes and dimensions of the type, the location of the marking, and how to
mark incusable (those that can be impressed with a stamp) and nonincusable items. Specifically, imitation political items--such
as buttons, posters, and coffee mugs--must be marked with the calendar year they were manufactured, and imitation
numismatic items--including coins, tokens, and paper money--must be marked with the word "copy." As part of its ongoing
systematic review of all Federal Trade Commission rules and guides, on July 14, 2014, the Commission requested public
comments on, among other things, the economic impact and benefits of the Rule; possible conflict between the Rule and State,
local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and the effect on the Rule of any technological, economic, or other industry changes.
79 FR 40691. The comment period closed on September 22, 2014.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: Undetermined
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 304 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 2101 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

Rule Review, Request for Public Comment

07/14/2014

Recommendation to Commission

05/00/2015

FR Cite
79 FR 40691

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA90
Agency Contact: Joshua S. Millard Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2454
E-Mail: jmillard@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB35

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information

10

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

Abstract: The Safeguards Rule, as directed by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB), requires each financial institution to
develop a written information security program that is appropriate to its size and complexity, the nature and scope of its
activities, and the sensitivity of the customer information at issue. The Commission believes that the rule strikes an appropriate
balance between allowing flexibility to financial institutions and establishing standards for safeguarding customer information that
are consistent with GLB's requirements. As part of its ongoing systematic review of all Federal Trade Commission rules and
guides, in Spring 2015 the Commission plans to request public comments on, among other things, the economic impact and
benefits of the rule; possible conflict between the rule and State, local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and the effect on
the rule of any technological, economic, or other industry changes.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Major: Undetermined
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 314 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

Rule Review, Request for Public Comment

FR Cite

05/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA87
Agency Contact: David Lincicum Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-8232, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2773
E-Mail: dlincicum@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB36
View Related Documents

Title: Contact Lens Rule
Abstract: The FTC promulgated the Contact Lens Rule (Rule) pursuant to the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act
(FCLCA), Public Law 108-164 (Dec. 6, 2003), which was enacted to enable consumers to purchase contact lenses from the
seller of their choice. The Rule became effective on August 2, 2004. As mandated by the FCLCA, the Rule requires contact lens
prescribers to provide prescriptions to their patients upon the completion of a contact lens fitting, and verify contact lens
prescriptions to contact lens sellers authorized by consumers to seek such verification. Sellers may provide contact lenses only
in accordance with a valid prescription that is directly presented to the seller or verified with the prescriber. As part of its ongoing
systematic review of all Federal Trade Commission rules and guides, in 2015, the Commission plans to request public
comments on, among other things, the economic impact and benefits of the Rule; possible conflict between the Rule and State,
local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and the effect on the Rule of any technological, economic, or other industry changes.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Major: No
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 315 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 7601 to 7610
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

Rule Review, Request for Public Comments

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA95
Agency Contact: Alysa Bernstein
Attorney

05/00/2015

Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No

11

FR Cite

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-10528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-3289
E-Mail: abernstein@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB37
View Related Documents

Title: Trade Regulation Rule on Ophthalmic Practice Rule
Abstract: Issued in 1978, the Trade Regulation Rule on Ophthalmic Practice Rules, also known as the Eyeglass Rule or the
Rule, provides that an optometrist or ophthalmologist must give the patient, at no extra cost, a copy of the eyeglass prescription
immediately after the examination is completed. The Rule also prohibits optometrists and ophthalmologists from conditioning the
availability of an eye examination, as defined by the Rule, on a requirement that the patient agrees to purchase ophthalmic
goods from the optometrist or ophthalmologist, and from placing on the prescription, or delivering to the patient, certain
disclaimers or waivers of liability. As part of its ongoing systematic review of all Federal Trade Commission rules and guides, in
2015 the Commission plans to request public comments on, among other things, the economic impact and benefits of the Rule;
possible conflict between the Rule and State, local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and the effect on the Rule of any
technological, economic, or other industry changes.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 456 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

Rule Review, Request for Public Comments

FR Cite

05/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA80
Agency Contact: Alysa Bernstein
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-10528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-3289
E-Mail: abernstein@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB05
View Related Documents

Title: Used Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation Rule
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, the Commission initiated its periodic review of the Used Car
Rule (or Used Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation Rule) on July 21, 2008, by publishing a notice seeking public comments on the
effectiveness and impact of the Rule and on proposed modifications to the Rule. 73 FR 42285. Effective in 1985, and last
reviewed in 1995, the Used Car Rule sets out the general duties of a used vehicle dealer and provides for a label to be affixed
to a vehicle's window describing whether the vehicle is warranted by the dealer and, if so, details about the warranty such as
the duration and systems covered. In response to comments, the Commission published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) on December 17, 2012 (77 FR 74746), and a final rule revising the Spanish translation of the window form on
December 12, 2012. 77 FR 73912. The extended comment period on the NPRM ended on March 13, 2013. The Commission is
currently considering staff's recommendation relating to the next step in this rulemaking.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: Undetermined
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 455 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

12

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2309
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

07/21/2008

ANPRM Comment Period End

09/19/2008

ANPRM Comment Period Extended

09/25/2008

ANPRM Comment Period Extended To

11/19/2008

ANPRM Comment Period Reopened

04/30/2009

ANPRM Comment Period End

06/15/2009

FR Cite
73 FR 42285
73 FR 55548
74 FR 19912

Final Rule

12/12/2012

77 FR 73912

NPRM

12/17/2012

77 FR 74746

Commission Action

12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
Agency Contact: John Hallerud
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
55 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1825, Chicago, IL 60603-5001
Chicago , IL 60603-5001
Phone: 312 960-5615
E-Mail: jhallerud@ftc.gov

Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB10
View Related Documents

Title: Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Cooling-Off Period for Sales Made at Homes or at Certain Other Locations
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on April 21, 2009, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Cooling-Off Rule (or the Trade Regulation Rule Concerning Cooling-Off Period for Sales Made at Homes or at
Certain Other Locations) by publishing a notice seeking public comments on the effectiveness and impact of the Rule. 74 FR
18170. Last revised in 1995, the Cooling-Off Rule requires that a consumer be given a 3-day right to cancel certain sales
greater than $25.00 that occur at a place other than a seller's place of business. The rule also requires a seller to notify buyers
orally of the right to cancel, to provide buyers with a dated receipt or copy of the contract containing the name and address of
the seller and notice of cancellation rights, and to provide buyers with forms that buyers may use to cancel the contract. The
2009 Federal Register Notice sought comments on, among other things, the economic impact and benefits of this rule; possible
conflict between the rule and State, local, or other Federal laws or regulations; and the effect on the rule of any technological,
economic, or other industry changes. At the request of several organizations, the comment period was reopened and extended
to September 25, 2009. 74 FR 36972. On January 17, 2013, the Commission announced that it was retaining the Cooling-Off
Rule and proposed increasing its $25 exclusionary limit to $130 to account for inflation. 78 FR 3855. The comment period for the
NPRM closed on March 4, 2013. Staff reviewed the comments and the Commission is currently reviewing that recommendation.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule
Major: Undetermined
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 429 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

04/21/2009

ANPRM Comment Period End

06/22/2009

ANPRM Comment Period Extended

07/27/2009

ANPRM Extended Comment Period End

09/25/2009

NPRM

01/17/2013

NPRM Comment Period End

03/04/2013

Commission Action

12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Small Entities Affected: Business

FR Cite
74 FR 18170
74 FR 36972
78 FR 3855

Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No

13

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA53
Agency Contact: Sana Coleman Chriss
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
Suite 1500, 225 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, GA 30303
Atlanta , GA 30303
Phone: 404 656-1364
E-Mail: schriss@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB15
View Related Documents

Title: Rule Concerning Energy And Water Use Labeling For Consumer Products
Abstract: As part of its systematic review of all current FTC rules and guides, the Commission issued an NPRM seeking public
comment on proposed changes to its Appliance Labeling Rule (now known as the Energy Labeling Rule), which requires energy
efficiency labels for major household appliances and other consumer products. 77 FR 15298 (Mar. 15, 2012). The FTC sought
comments on the Rule's benefits and costs, and on several proposed changes, including whether the Commission should
eliminate duplicative reporting requirements for manufacturers, require a uniform method for attaching labels to appliances,
place EnergyGuide labels on room air conditioner packages instead of on the products, improve website disclosures, and revise
ceiling fan labels. On January 10, 2013, the Commission amended the rule by streamlining data reporting requirements for
manufacturers, clarifying testing requirements and enforcement provisions, improving online energy label disclosures, and
making several minor technical changes and corrections. 78 FR 2200. For televisions, the Commission issued proposed
amendments that would conform the rule to a new DOE test procedure for televisions. 78 FR 78305 (Dec. 26, 2013). The
comment period closed on February 10, 2014. On April 9, 2014, the Commission issued conforming amendments to ensure the
rule's television labeling requirements are consistent with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), which mandates that
FTC labels reflect applicable DOE test procedures. 79 FR 19464. As part of the regulatory review of the rule, the Commission
issued a supplemental NPRM on June 18, 2014, proposing to expand coverage of the Lighting Facts label, change the current
label categories for refrigerators, revise the ceiling fan label design and require room air conditioner labels on packaging instead
of the units themselves. 79 FR 34642. The comment period closed on August 18, 2014. Staff anticipates forwarding a
recommendation to the Commission during the Fall of 2014.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule
Major: Undetermined
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 305 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: sec 321 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA); sec 325 of the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007
Legal Deadline: Regional Efficiency Standards--15 months after the Department of Energy (DOE) issued their final efficiency
standards on October 25, 2011.
Action

Source

Other

Description

Date

15 months after DOE issued their final efficiency standards on October
25, 2011

01/25/2013

Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

07/17/2008

Public Meeting

09/15/2008

ANPRM Comment Period End

09/29/2008

ANPRM (Consumer Electronics)

03/16/2009

ANPRM (Consumer Electronics) Comment Period End

05/14/2009

NPRM (Light Bulbs)

11/10/2009

NPRM Comment Period End (Light Bulbs)

12/28/2009

FR Cite
73 FR 40988

74 FR 11045
74 FR 57950

NPRM (TVs and Other Consumer Electronics)

03/11/2010

Public Meeting (TVs and Other Consumer Electronics)

04/16/2010

NPRM (TVs and Other Consumer Electronics) Comment Period End

05/14/2010

Final Rule (Light Bulbs)

07/19/2010

75 FR 41696

Technical Correction to Final Rule (Light Bulbs)

08/16/2010

75 FR 49818

Comment Period End (Light Bulb: Other Issues)

09/20/2010

75 FR 11483

NPRM (Light Bulbs)

12/29/2010

75 FR 81943

Final Rule (TVs)

01/06/2011

76 FR 1038

Final Rule (Light Bulb)

04/12/2011

76 FR 20233

NPRM (Light Bulb II)

08/01/2011

76 FR 45715

ANPRM (Regional Efficiency Standards)

11/28/2011

76 FR 72872

Public Meeting (Regional Efficiency Standards)

12/16/2011

14

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

ANPRM Comment Period End (Regional Efficiency Standards)

01/10/2012

NPRM (Systematic Review)

03/15/2012

NPRM (Regional Efficiency Standards)

06/06/2012

77 FR 33337

NPRM (Comparability Ranges)

01/09/2013

78 FR 1779

Final Rule (Systematic Review)

01/10/2013

78 FR 2200

Final Rule (Regional Efficiency Standards)

02/06/2013

78 FR 8362

Final Rule (Comparability Ranges)

07/23/2013

78 FR 43974

NPRM (Televisions)

12/26/2013

78 FR 78305

NPRM (Televisions) Comment Period End

02/14/2014

Final Rule (Televisions)

04/09/2014

79 FR 19464

Supplemental NPRM

06/18/2014

79 FR 34642

Supplemental NPRM Comment Period End

08/18/2014

Recommendation to Commission

12/00/2014

77 FR 15298

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions;
Federalism: No
Organizations
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Related to 3084-AB11
Agency Contact: Hampton Newsome
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
Bureau of Consumer Protection, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2889
E-Mail: hnewsome@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB19
View Related Documents

Title: Telemarketing Sales Rule
Abstract: Commission staff is considering proposed "Anti-Fraud" amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR)
concerning, among other things, the misuse of novel payment methods, such as remotely created checks, remotely created
payment orders, cash-to-cash money transfers, and cash reload mechanisms in inbound or outbound telemarketing
transactions, by telemarketers and sellers. On May 21, 2013, the Commission issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM),
which was published in the Federal Register on July 9, 2013. 78 FR 41200. After a short extension, the comment period closed
on August 8, 2013. Commission staff is reviewing the comments submitted in response to the NPRM, and anticipates making a
recommendation to the Commission by the end of 2014. On August 11, 2014, the Commission initiated periodic review of this
rule and solicited public comments. 79 FR 46732. The comment period as extended will close on November 13, 2014. 79 FR
61267.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule
Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 310 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 6101 to 6108; 15 USC 41 to 58
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

NPRM

08/19/2009

NPRM Comment Period End

10/09/2009

FR Cite
74 FR 41988

NPRM Comment Period Extended

10/15/2009

NPRM Extended Comment Period End

10/26/2009

Public Forum

11/04/2009

Final Rule

08/10/2010

75 FR 48458

Technical Correction to Final Rule

08/24/2010

75 FR 51934

Effective Date

09/27/2010

Effective Date (Advance Fee Ban)

10/27/2010

ANPRM (Caller ID)

12/15/2010

75 FR 78179

NPRM (Anti-fraud)

07/09/2013

78 FR 41200

Closure of Proceeding (Caller ID)

12/20/2013

78 FR 77024

Rule Review, Request for Public Comment

08/14/2014

79 FR 46732

Rule Review Extended Comment Period End

10/10/2014

79 FR 61267

15

74 FR 52914

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Recommendation to Commission (Anti-fraud)

Unified Agenda

12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Agency Contact: Karen Hobbs
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., CC-8528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-3587
E-Mail: khobbs@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB28
View Related Documents

Title: Care Labeling of Textile Apparel and Certain Piece Goods as Amended
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on July 13, 2011, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Care Labeling Rule (or the Rule on Care Labeling of Textile Apparel and Certain Piece Goods as Amended) by
publishing a notice seeking public comments on the effectiveness and impact of the rule. 76 FR 41148. The comment period
closed on September 6, 2011, and staff reviewed the comments. On September 11, 2012, the Commission announced a Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Based on a review of comments, the Agency has concluded that the rule continues to benefit
consumers and will be retained. The NPRM is now seeking comments on potential updates to the rule, including changes that
would: allow manufacturers and importers, if they so choose, to include professional instructions for wet-cleaning-an
environmentally friendly alternative to drycleaning-on labels if the garment can be professionally wet-cleaned; permit
manufacturers to use updated ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) or ISO (International Organization for
Standardization) symbols on labels in lieu of written terms providing care instructions; and clarify what constitutes a reasonable
basis for care instructions; and update and expand the definition of "dryclean" to reflect current practices and account for the
advent of new solvents. The comment period closed on November 16, 2012. On July 24, 2013, the Commission announced that
it would host a public roundtable on October 1, 2013, to analyze proposed changes to the rule. 78 FR 45901. On March 28,
2014, the Commission hosted a public roundtable in Washington DC that analyzed proposed changes to the rule. Staff
anticipates forwarding a recommendation to the Commission during early 2015. The Care Labeling Rule makes it an unfair or
deceptive act or practice for manufacturers and importers of textile wearing apparel and certain piece goods to sell these items
without attaching care labels stating "what regular care is needed for the ordinary use of the product." The rule also requires that
the manufacturer or importer possess, prior to sale, a reasonable basis for the care instructions, and allows the use of approved
care symbols in lieu of words to disclose care instructions.
Priority: Other Significant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule
Major: Undetermined
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 423 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

07/13/2011

ANPRM Comment Period Closed

09/06/2011

NPRM

09/20/2012

NPRM Comment Period Closed

11/16/2012

Commission Roundtable

03/28/2014

NPRM and Roundtable Comment Period End

04/11/2014

Recommendation to Commission

03/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA54
Agency Contact: Robert M Frisby
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission

FR Cite
76 FR 41148
77 FR 58338

Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No

16

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2098
E-Mail: rfrisby@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB32

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Premerger Notification Rules and Report Form
Abstract: The Premerger Notification Rules (HSR Rules or Rules) and the Antitrust Improvements Act Notification and Report
Form (HSR Form) were adopted pursuant to section 7A of the Clayton Act. Section 7A requires firms of a certain size
contemplating mergers or acquisitions of a specified size to file notification with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and to wait a designated period of time before consummating the transaction. It also requires
the FTC, with the concurrence of the U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, to promulgate rules requiring that notification
be in a form and contain information necessary to enable the FTC and DOJ to determine whether the proposed acquisition may,
if consummated, violate the antitrust laws. These Rules are continually reviewed in order to improve the program's effectiveness
and to reduce the paperwork burden on the business community. Pursuant to the 2000 Amendments to section 7A of the
Clayton Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. 18a, the filing thresholds are revised annually based on the change in gross national product.
The threshold reporting figure of the size of transaction test under section 7A(a)(2)(B)(I) is now $75.9 million, which was
effective February 24, 2014. 79 FR 3814. On April 25, 2014, the Commission issued a final rule for the HSR Rules, updating
the Instructions to the HSR Form to reflect the address for the Premerger Office's new location in the Constitution Center. The
effective date of the new address was May 6, 2014. 79 FR 25662. The Premerger Office is considering amendments to the HSR
Rules regarding standards for the valuation of potentially reportable transactions. The proposed amendments may be issued
during the first quarter of 2015. The Premerger Office is also considering amendments to the Instructions to the HSR Form to
update information related to NAICS codes, recent rule changes and allow the submission of filings on electronic media.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 801 to 803 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 18a Clayton Act
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

FR Cite

NPRM (Licensing Agreements)

08/20/2012

77 FR 50057

NPRM (Licensing Agreements) Comment Period End

10/25/2012

NPRM (Withdrawal of HSR Filings)

02/01/2013

78 FR 10574

Final Rule (Withdrawal of HSR Filings)

06/25/2013

78 FR 41293

Final Rule (Licensing Agreements)

11/15/2013

78 FR 68705

Final Rule (New Address ? PMN Office)

04/25/2014

79 FR 25662

NPRM

03/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: No
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA91; Previously
Reported as 3084-AA23
Agency Contact: Marian Bruno
Deputy Director
Federal Trade Commission
Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2846
E-Mail: mbruno@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB39
View Related Documents

17

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

Title: Automotive Fuel Ratings, Certification and Posting
Abstract: First issued in 1979 as required by section 203(c)(1) of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act and last revised in
2011, the Automotive Fuel Ratings, Certification, and Posting Rule (known as Fuel Rating Rule) sets out a uniform method by
which the octane rating of automotive gasoline can be certified from the refiner through the chain of distribution and then
displayed at the point of retail sale. The rule enables consumers to buy gasoline with an octane rating that is high enough to
prevent inefficient and harmful "engine knock" and to avoid buying a gasoline with an octane rating that is needlessly higher
than the requirements of their automobiles. The rule also establishes standard procedures for determining, certifying, and
posting (by means of a label on the fuel dispenser) the rating of automotive fuels intended for sale to consumers. The
certification requirement may be satisfied by industry documents (shipping receipts, delivery tickets, etc.) on which the rating is
noted, or can be accomplished with a one-time letter of certification. In addition, the rule contains recordkeeping requirements
that require refiners and importers to retain rating test records and distributors and retailers to retain certification records for 1
year. On March 27, 2014, the Commission announced proposed ethanol labeling amendments to revise rating, certification and
labeling requirements for blends of gasoline with more than 10 percent ethanol, and a new octane rating method that would
lower compliance costs. The comment period closed on July 2, 2014. Staff is reviewing comments and anticipates sending a
recommendation to the Commission by the end of the first quarter of 2015.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 306 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 et seq; 15 USC 2801 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

NPRM

04/04/2014

NPRM Comment Period End

07/02/2014

Recommendation to Commission

03/00/2015

FR Cite
79 FR 18850

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AB14
Agency Contact: Miriam Lederer
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2975
E-Mail: mlederer@ftc.gov
Agency Contact: R Michael Waller Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2902
E-Mail: rwaller@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB07
View Related Documents

Title: Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on September 11, 2007, the Commission initiated its
periodic review of the Mail or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule (MTOR or Rule) by publishing a notice seeking public
comments on the effectiveness and impact of the Rule. 72 FR 51728. The FTC also sought public comment on how the Rule
could be amended to address changes in technology and commercial practices. Issued in 1975, and last amended in 1995, the
MTOR requires that when sellers advertise merchandise, they must have a reasonable basis for stating or implying that they can
ship within a certain time. If sellers make no shipment statement, they must have a reasonable basis for believing that they can
ship within 30 days. In the event of delays in shipment, the Rule establishes notification procedures whereby buyers have the
option either to agree to the delay or to cancel the order and receive a prompt refund. The Rule applies when a consumer
places an order by mail or telephone and also by indirect use of telephone via facsimile or computer. Based on a review of
comments received to the 2007 ANPRM, on September 30, 2011, the FTC published a Federal Register Notice concluding that
the Rule continues to benefit consumers and will be retained. 76 FR 60715. For clarity, the Commission reorganized the Rule
by alphabetizing the definitions at the beginning of the Rule. Also on September 30, 2011, in a separate Federal Register
Notice, the Commission issued an NPRM seeking comment on, among other things, possible changes to the Rule to: clarify that
the Rule covers all orders placed over the Internet; revise the Rule to allow sellers to provide refunds and refund notices to

18

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

buyers by any means at least as fast and reliable as first-class mail; clarify sellers' obligations when buyers use payment
methods not spelled out in the Rule, such as debit cards or prepaid gift cards; and require that refunds be made within 7
working days for purchases that are made using third-party credit, such as Visa or MasterCard cards. 76 FR 60765. The
comment period ended on December 14, 2011. After reviewing the comments, staff submitted its recommendation to the
Commission. On April 29, 2013, the Commission announced the availability of the Staff Report on MTOR, which solicited
comments for 75 days. The comment period closed on July 15, 2013. On September 11, 2014, the Commission announced it
was adopting final amendments to the Rule, including revising its name to Mail Internet or Telephone Order Merchandise. 79 FR
55615 (Sept. 17, 2014). Other final amendments clarify that the Rule covers all orders placed over the Internet; revise the Rule
to allow sellers to provide refunds and refund notices by any means at least as fast and reliable as first class mail; clarify sellers'
obligations when buyers use payment systems not enumerated in the Rule; and require that refunds be made within 7 working
days for purchases made using third-party credit cards. The final rule is effective on December 8, 2014.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule
Major: No
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 435 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 57a
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

FR Cite

ANPRM

09/11/2007

72 FR 51728

ANPRM Comment Period End

11/07/2007

NPRM

09/30/2011

76 FR 60765

Final Rule

09/30/2011

76 FR 60715

NPRM Comment Period End

12/14/2011

Staff Report Announced

04/29/2013

Staff Report Published

05/03/2013

Comment Period Closes on Staff Report

07/15/2013

Final Rule

09/17/2014

Final Rule Effective Date

12/08/2014

78 FR 25908
79 FR 55615

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Related to 3084-AA19
Agency Contact: Jock K Chung
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2984
E-Mail: jchung@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB27

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Rules and Regulations Under the Fur Products Labeling Act
Abstract: The Fur Products Labeling Act (Fur Act) requires covered furs and fur products to be labeled, invoiced, and
advertised to show: (1) the name(s) of the animal that produced the fur(s); (2) that the fur is used fur or contains used fur, if such
is the case; (3) that the fur is bleached, dyed, or otherwise artificially colored, if such is the case; and (4) the name of the
country of origin of any imported furs used in the fur product. Pursuant to section 8(b) of the Fur Act, "... the Commission is
authorized and directed to prescribe rules and regulations governing the manner and form of disclosing information required by
this Act and such further rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper for purposes of administration and enforcement
of this Act." These implementing Fur Rules are set forth at 16 CFR 301. In December 2010, Congress passed the Truth in Fur
Labeling Act (TFLA), which amends the Fur Act, by: (1) eliminating the Commission's discretion to exempt fur products of
"relatively small quantity or value" from disclosure requirements; and (2) providing that the Fur Act will not apply to certain fur
products "obtained ... through trapping or hunting" and sold in "face to face transaction[s]." Public Law No. 111-113. TFLA also
directed the Commission to review and allow comment on the Fur Products Name Guide, 16 CFR 301.0 (Name Guide).
Accordingly, the Commission issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) and a request for comments on
March 14, 2011, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on September 17, 2012, and a supplemental NPRM on June 19,
2013. On May 28, 2014, the Commission published amendments to the Fur Rules that update the Fur Products Name Guide,

19

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

provide more labeling flexibility, incorporate Truth in Fur Labeling Act provisions and conform the guaranty provisions to those
governing the rules under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act. 79 FR 30445. The amendments are effective on
November 19, 2014. More specifically, the changes eliminate unnecessary requirements on companies that sell fur products to
give them more flexibility on labeling, update the Fur Products Name Guide that lists common animal names allowed on fur
labels, incorporate provisions of a fur labeling law passed by Congress in 2010, the TFLA, including the elimination of the
Commission's discretion to exempt fur products of relatively small quantity or value from disclosure requirements; and providing
that the Fur Act would not apply to products covered by the hunter/trapper exemption.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 301 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 69
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

03/14/2011

ANPRM Comment Period Closed

05/16/2011

NPRM

09/17/2012

NPRM Comment Period End

11/16/2012

Supplemental NPRM

06/19/2013

Supplemental NPRM Comment Period End

07/23/2013

Final Rule

05/28/2014

Final Rule Effective Date

11/19/2014

FR Cite
76 FR 13551
77 FR 57043
78 FR 36693
79 FR 30445

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA51
Agency Contact: Robert M Frisby
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2098
E-Mail: rfrisby@ftc.gov

RIN: 3084-AB16

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

View Related Documents
Title: Preservation of Consumers' Claims and Defenses (Holder-in-Due-Course Rule)
Abstract: In early 2016, the Commission plans to request comments on the rule as part of the Commission's systematic review
of all current Commission rules and guides. Issued in 1975, the Holder-in-Due-Course Rule requires sellers to insert language
into consumer credit contracts that preserves any claims and defenses that consumers might have against the seller. The
Commission promulgated the rule after concluding that the use of certain credit transactions to foreclose consumer claims and
defenses arising from credit sale transactions was an unfair practice. This rule eliminated the holder-in-due-course doctrine as a
legal defense for separating the consumer's obligation to pay from the seller's duty to perform. The rule specifically requires
sellers entering into "consumer credit contracts" or accepting the proceeds of "purchase money loans" to ensure that sales
finance contracts and loan contracts contain one of two clauses that preserve the buyer's right to assert against any "holder" of
the credit contract the sales-related claims and defenses that the buyer may have against the seller.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 433 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 45 et seq
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

01/00/2016

20

FR Cite

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined
Government Levels Affected: Undetermined
Small Entities Affected: Business; Governmental Jurisdictions;
Federalism: No
Organizations
Energy Affected: No
Related RINs: Related to 3084-AA08
Agency Contact: Malini Mithal
Assistant Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection/Financial Practices
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., CC-10232, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2972
E-Mail: mmithal1@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB38
View Related Documents

Title: CAN-SPAM Rule
Abstract: The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003 (the CAN-SPAM Act or the Act)
was enacted on December 16, 2003, and sets the rules for commercial email, establishes requirements for commercial
messages, gives recipients the right to have senders of commercial email stop emailing them, and provides for penalties for
violations. FTC issued the CAN-SPAM Rule (Rule) to implement the Act, as authorized by the statute. As part of its ongoing
systematic review of all Federal Trade Commission rules and guides, in 2015 the Commission plans to request public comments
on, among other things, the economic impact and benefits of the Rule; possible conflict between the Rule and State, local, or
other Federal laws or regulations; and the effect on the Rule of any technological, economic, or other industry changes.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action
Major: Undetermined
Unfunded Mandates: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 316 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 7701 to 7713; 18 USC 1037
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

Rule Review, Request for Public Comments

FR Cite

12/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA96
Agency Contact: Christopher Brown Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-8528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2825
E-Mail: cbrown3@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB13
View Related Documents

Title: Use of Prenotification Negative Option Plans
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on May 14, 2009, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Negative Option Rule (or the Trade Regulation Rule on Use of Prenotification Negative Option Plans) by
publishing a notice seeking public comments on the effectiveness and impact of the rule. 74 FR 22720. Issued in 1974, and last
reviewed in 1997, the Negative Option Rule governs the operation of prenotification subscription plans. Under these plans,
sellers ship merchandise, such as books, compact discs, or tapes, automatically to their subscribers and bill them for the
merchandise if consumers do not expressly reject the merchandise within a prescribed time. The rule protects consumers by: (a)
requiring that promotional materials disclose the terms of membership clearly and conspicuously; and (b) establishing

21

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

Unified Agenda

procedures for the administration of such "negative option" plans. The 2009 Federal Register Notice sought comments on,
among other things, the economic impact and benefits of this rule; possible conflict between the rule and State, local, or other
Federal laws or regulations; the effect on the rule of any technological, economic, or other industry changes; and whether the
rule should be extended to cover other types of negative option plans. The comment period closed on July 27, 2009. Staff
received requests seeking to extend the comment period from several States, a county government agency, and an industry
trade association. On August 7, 2009, the Commission granted these requests and reopened the comment period until October
13, 2009 (74 FR 40124). On July 25, 2014, the Commission announced it was closing the periodic Regulatory Review and
retaining the Negative Option Rule as currently written. 79 FR 44271 (July 31, 2014).
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 425 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 41 to 58
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

ANPRM

FR Cite

05/14/2009

74 FR 22720

ANPRM Comment Period Reopened

08/11/2009

74 FR 40121

ANPRM Revised Comment Period End

10/13/2009

Confirmation of Rule

07/31/2014

79 FR 44271

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Small Entities Affected: Business; Organizations
Federalism: No
Energy Affected: No
Agency Contact: Robert M Frisby
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2098
E-Mail: rfrisby@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission ( FTC )

RIN: 3084-AB29
View Related Documents

Title: Rules and Regulations Under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939
Abstract: As part of the systematic review of all Commission rules, on January 30, 2012, the Commission initiated its periodic
review of the Wool Rules by publishing a notice seeking public comments on the effectiveness and impact of the rules. 77 FR
4498. On September 16, 2013, the Commission announced it was issuing an NPRM proposing changes designed to clarify and
update the rules, to make them more flexible, and to align them with the Commission's proposed amendments to the Textile
Rules. 78 FR 57808. The comment period was initially set to close on November 25, 2013. The comment period later extended
closed on December 3, 2013. On June 4, 2014, the Commission amended the Wool Rules to conform to the 2006 amendments
to the Wool Suit Fabric Labeling Fairness and International Standards Conforming Act and the amended Textile Rules. 79 FR
32157. The changes included incorporating the laws new definitions for cashmere and very fine wools clarifying descriptions of
products containing virgin or new wool and allowing certain hang-tags disclosing fiber trademarks and performance even if they
do not disclose the products full fiber content. The amended rules were effective on July 7, 2014. The Wool Products Labeling
Act of 1939 (Wool Act) requires covered wool products to be marked with: (1) the generic names and percentages by weight of
the constituent fibers present in the wool product; (2) the name under which the manufacturer or another responsible U.S.
company does business, or in lieu thereof, the registered identification number (RN) of such a company; and (3) the name of
the country where the wool product was processed or manufactured. Pursuant to section 6(a) of the Wool Act, "The Commission
is authorized and directed to make rules and regulations for the manner and form of disclosing information required by this Act
... and to make such further rules and regulations under and in pursuance of the terms of this Act as may be necessary and
proper for administration and enforcement." These implementing rules and regulations are set forth at 16 CFR 300.
Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Unfunded Mandates: No
Major: No
CFR Citation: 16 CFR 300 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )
Legal Authority: 15 USC 68
Legal Deadline: None
Timetable:
Action

Date

22

FR Cite

Regulations.gov

Friday, November 21, 2014

ANPRM

01/30/2012

ANPRM Comment Period Closed

04/26/2012

NPRM Announced

09/16/2013

NPRM

09/20/2013

NPRM Comment Period Closed

12/03/2013

Final Rule

06/04/2014

Final Rule Effective Date

07/07/2014

Unified Agenda
77 FR 4498

78 FR 57808
79 FR 32157

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No
Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism: No
Small Entities Affected: Business
Energy Affected: No
International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of
international interest.
Related RINs: Previously Reported as 3084-AA50
Agency Contact: Robert M Frisby
Attorney
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., CC-9528, Washington, DC 20580
Washington , DC 20580
Phone: 202 326-2098
E-Mail: rfrisby@ftc.gov

23

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Aftc%3Aea551dfecab7ca7f. Public record. Not legal advice.
