# UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Aftc%3A063fd350701bd470

## Record

- **Collection:** Agency decision
- **Document type:** Agency decision

## Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20580

Bureau of Consumer Protection
Division of Marketing Practices

Lois C. Greisman
Associate Director

March 27, 2020
VIA PDF EMAIL ATTACHMENT
VoIPMax

Warning Regarding Assisting and Facilitating
Illegal Robocalls Related to Coronavirus/COVID-19
The owners, officers, and employees of VoIPMax:
Staff at the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) is investigating companies and
individuals that may be involved in illegal robocalls capitalizing on the Coronavirus/COVID-19
pandemic. Many of these robocalls prey upon consumer fear of the pandemic to perpetrate scams
or disseminate disinformation. FTC staff have reason to believe that one or more of your
customers may be involved in such illegal telemarketing campaigns.
Please review this letter and the attached documents in detail. By March 30, 2020, please
send an email to Ian Barlow and James Evans, attorneys in the FTC’s Division of
Marketing Practices, describing the specific actions you have taken to ensure your
company’s services are not being used in Coronavirus/COVID-19 robocall schemes. Their
email addresses are: ibarlow@ftc.gov and james.evans@ftc.gov.
This letter provides information about FTC laws, regulations, and enforcement actions
that may bear upon your business activities. In particular, the FTC has previously brought
robocall enforcement actions against companies that provided illegal robocallers with Voice over
Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) services and access to telephone numbers such as direct inbound dial
numbers. The FTC brought these enforcement actions under the Federal Trade Commission Act
(“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 45, and the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”), 16 C.F.R. Part 310. The
FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts and practices, and the TSR prohibits deceptive and
abusive telemarketing practices, including the use of prerecorded messages.
In addition, section 310.3(b) of the TSR prohibits any person from “assisting and
facilitating” certain conduct. 1 Under that provision, “it is unlawful for any person or entity to
1

A copy of the TSR is attached as Appendix A.

Page 2
provide substantial assistance or support to a seller or telemarketer when that person or entity
knows or consciously avoids knowing that the seller or telemarketer is engaged in any act or
practice that violates Sections 310.3(a), (c), or (d), or Section 310.4 of the TSR,” which prohibit,
among other conduct, the following:
• Making a false or misleading statement to induce any person to pay for goods or
services or to induce a charitable contribution (16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(4));
• Misrepresenting a seller or telemarketer’s affiliation with any government agency (16
C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(2)(vii));
• Transmitting false or deceptive caller ID numbers (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(8));
• Initiating or causing the initiation of calls that deliver prerecorded messages, unless
the person called provided the seller express written permission to call (16 C.F.R.
§ 310.4(b)(v)); and
• Initiating or causing the initiation of telemarketing calls to numbers listed on the
National Do Not Call Registry, unless the person called provided express written
permission to receive calls from the seller or the seller had an existing business
relationship with the person called (16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(iii)(B)).
The FTC can obtain civil penalties for TSR violations. Each illegal call is subject to a
maximum civil penalty of $43,280. See 16 C.F.R. § 1.98(d). In addition, a violation of the TSR is
a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 6102(c), 57a(d)(3), 45(a). Accordingly,
the FTC has authority to seek both preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to address
violations of the TSR. See 15 U.S.C. § 53(b). The FTC may also seek the refund of money or
payment of damages to address violations of the TSR. See 15 U.S.C. § 57b(b).
Combatting illegal robocalls is a top priority for the FTC, 2 with a particular focus on
robocalls involving Coronavirus/COVID-19. As part of its robocall enforcement efforts, the
FTC has brought assisting and facilitating claims against technology companies that knowingly
provided software and servers used by illegal robocallers, even though these technology
companies did not contract directly with the illegal robocallers. See FTC v. James B. Christiano,
No. 8:18-cv-00936 (C.D. Cal. filed May 31, 2018).
We also want to bring to your attention that the FTC recently sued a VoIP service
provider for allegedly violating the TSR, 16 C.F.R. Part 310. In that case, FTC v. Educare, the
FTC alleged that defendant Globex Telecom, Inc. assisted and facilitated telemarketers it knew,
or consciously avoided knowing, were violating the TSR’s prohibitions on calls delivering
prerecorded messages. See FTC v. Educare Centre Services, Inc., No. 3:19-cv-00196-KC (W.D.
Tex. Am. Compl. filed Dec. 3, 2019). 3
2

In fiscal year 2019, the FTC received more than 5.4 million complaints about unwanted calls,
including more than 3.7 million robocall complaints. The FTC maintains an interactive Tableau
Public web page that publishes details about do not call complaints on a quarterly basis. See
public.tableau.com/profile/federal.trade.commission#!/vizhome/DoNotCallComplaints/Maps.
3
A copy of the FTC’s Amended Complaint is attached as Appendix B.

Page 3
The FTC has business educational materials that can assist you in complying with the
TSR and information about the FTC’s efforts to protect consumers from scams involving
Coronavirus/COVID-19. See ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/complyingtelemarketing-sales-rule and ftc.gov/coronavirus.
In addition to understanding FTC regulations and the FTC’s December 2019 action
against a provider of VoIP services, you should be aware that in January 2020, the United States
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) brought two civil actions against VoIP companies and their
owners. In those cases, DOJ alleged that the defendants were committing and conspiring to
commit wire fraud by knowingly transmitting robocalls that impersonated federal government
agencies. See justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-files-actions-stop-telecom-carriers-whofacilitated-hundreds-millions.
Again, it is important to review this letter and the attached documents in detail. We look
forward to receiving your email response by March 30, 2020, describing the specific actions you
have taken to ensure your company’s services are not being used in Coronavirus/COVID-19
robocall schemes. As noted above, please send the email to Ian Barlow and James Evans,
attorneys in the FTC’s Division of Marketing Practices. You may also contact them with any
questions regarding compliance with the FTC Act or the TSR. Their contact information is:
Ian Barlow, ibarlow@ftc.gov, 202-326-3120, and James Evans, james.evans@ftc.gov,
202-326-2026.
Sincerely,

/s/Lois C. Greisman
Lois C. Greisman
Associate Director

Enclosures:
Appendix A (TSR)
Appendix B (Educare Amended Complaint)

Appendix A
(Telemarketing Sales Rule)

Federal Trade Commission

§ 310.2

PART 310—TELEMARKETING SALES
RULE 16 CFR PART 310

AUTHORITY: 15 U.S.C. 6101–6108.
SOURCE: 75 FR 48516, Aug. 10, 2010, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 310.2 Definitions.
(a) Acquirer means a business organization, financial institution, or an
agent of a business organization or financial institution that has authority
from an organization that operates or
licenses a credit card system to authorize merchants to accept, transmit, or
process payment by credit card
through the credit card system for
money, goods or services, or anything
else of value.

381

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00391

EC29SE91.044

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

Sec.
310.1 Scope of regulations in this part.
310.2 Definitions.
310.3 Deceptive telemarketing acts or practices.
310.4 Abusive telemarketing acts or practices.
310.5 Recordkeeping requirements.
310.6 Exemptions.
310.7 Actions by states and private persons.
310.8 Fee for access to the National Do Not
Call Registry.
310.9 Severability.

§ 310.1 Scope of regulations in this
part.
This part implements the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and
Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. 61016108, as amended.

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

§ 310.2

16 CFR Ch. I (1–1–18 Edition)

(b) Attorney General means the chief
legal officer of a state.
(c) Billing information means any data
that enables any person to access a
customer’s or donor’s account, such as
a credit card, checking, savings, share
or similar account, utility bill, mortgage loan account, or debit card.
(d) Caller identification service means a
service that allows a telephone subscriber to have the telephone number,
and, where available, name of the calling party transmitted contemporaneously with the telephone call, and
displayed on a device in or connected
to the subscriber’s telephone.
(e) Cardholder means a person to
whom a credit card is issued or who is
authorized to use a credit card on behalf of or in addition to the person to
whom the credit card is issued.
(f) Cash-to-cash money transfer means
the electronic (as defined in section
106(2) of the Electronic Signatures in
Global and National Commerce Act (15
U.S.C. 7006(2)) transfer of the value of
cash received from one person to another person in a different location
that is sent by a money transfer provider and received in the form of cash.
For purposes of this definition, money
transfer provider means any person or
financial institution that provides
cash-to-cash money transfers for a person in the normal course of its business, whether or not the person holds
an account with such person or financial institution. The term cash-to-cash
money transfer includes a remittance
transfer, as defined in section 919(g)(2)
of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act
(‘‘EFTA’’), 15 U.S.C. 1693a, that is a
cash-to-cash transaction; however it
does not include any transaction that
is:
(1) An electronic fund transfer as defined in section 903 of the EFTA;
(2) Covered by Regulation E, 12 CFR
1005.20, pertaining to gift cards; or
(3) Subject to the Truth in Lending
Act, 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.
(g) Cash reload mechanism is a device,
authorization code, personal identification number, or other security measure
that makes it possible for a person to
convert cash into an electronic (as defined in section 106(2) of the Electronic
Signatures in Global and National
Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7006(2)) form

that can be used to add funds to a general-use prepaid card, as defined in
Regulation E, 12 CFR 1005.2, or an account with a payment intermediary.
For purposes of this definition, a cash
reload mechanism is not itself a general-use prepaid debit card or a swipe
reload process or similar method in
which funds are added directly onto a
person’s own general-use prepaid card
or account with a payment intermediary.
(h) Charitable contribution means any
donation or gift of money or any other
thing of value.
(i) Commission means the Federal
Trade Commission.
(j) Credit means the right granted by
a creditor to a debtor to defer payment
of debt or to incur debt and defer its
payment.
(k) Credit card means any card, plate,
coupon book, or other credit device existing for the purpose of obtaining
money, property, labor, or services on
credit.
(l) Credit card sales draft means any
record or evidence of a credit card
transaction.
(m) Credit card system means any
method or procedure used to process
credit card transactions involving credit cards issued or licensed by the operator of that system.
(n) Customer means any person who is
or may be required to pay for goods or
services
offered
through
telemarketing.
(o) Debt relief service means any program or service represented, directly or
by implication, to renegotiate, settle,
or in any way alter the terms of payment or other terms of the debt between a person and one or more unsecured creditors or debt collectors, including, but not limited to, a reduction
in the balance, interest rate, or fees
owed by a person to an unsecured creditor or debt collector.
(p) Donor means any person solicited
to make a charitable contribution.
(q) Established business relationship
means a relationship between a seller
and a consumer based on:
(1) the consumer’s purchase, rental,
or lease of the seller’s goods or services
or a financial transaction between the

382

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00392

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

Federal Trade Commission

§ 310.2

consumer and seller, within the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding
the date of a telemarketing call; or
(2) the consumer’s inquiry or application regarding a product or service offered by the seller, within the three (3)
months immediately preceding the
date of a telemarketing call.
(r) Free-to-pay conversion means, in an
offer or agreement to sell or provide
any goods or services, a provision
under which a customer receives a
product or service for free for an initial
period and will incur an obligation to
pay for the product or service if he or
she does not take affirmative action to
cancel before the end of that period.
(s) Investment opportunity means anything, tangible or intangible, that is offered, offered for sale, sold, or traded
based wholly or in part on representations, either express or implied, about
past, present, or future income, profit,
or appreciation.
(t) Material means likely to affect a
person’s choice of, or conduct regarding, goods or services or a charitable
contribution.
(u) Merchant means a person who is
authorized under a written contract
with an acquirer to honor or accept
credit cards, or to transmit or process
for payment credit card payments, for
the purchase of goods or services or a
charitable contribution.
(v) Merchant agreement means a written contract between a merchant and
an acquirer to honor or accept credit
cards, or to transmit or process for
payment credit card payments, for the
purchase of goods or services or a charitable contribution.
(w) Negative option feature means, in
an offer or agreement to sell or provide
any goods or services, a provision
under which the customer’s silence or
failure to take an affirmative action to
reject goods or services or to cancel the
agreement is interpreted by the seller
as acceptance of the offer.
(x) Outbound telephone call means a
telephone call initiated by a telemarketer to induce the purchase of
goods or services or to solicit a charitable contribution.
(y) Person means any individual,
group, unincorporated association, limited or general partnership, corporation, or other business entity.

(z) Preacquired account information
means any information that enables a
seller or telemarketer to cause a
charge to be placed against a customer’s or donor’s account without obtaining the account number directly
from the customer or donor during the
telemarketing transaction pursuant to
which the account will be charged.
(aa) Prize means anything offered, or
purportedly offered, and given, or purportedly given, to a person by chance.
For purposes of this definition, chance
exists if a person is guaranteed to receive an item and, at the time of the
offer or purported offer, the telemarketer does not identify the specific
item that the person will receive.
(bb) Prize promotion means:
(1) A sweepstakes or other game of
chance; or
(2) An oral or written express or implied representation that a person has
won, has been selected to receive, or
may be eligible to receive a prize or
purported prize.
(cc) Remotely created payment order
means any payment instruction or
order drawn on a person’s account that
is created by the payee or the payee’s
agent and deposited into or cleared
through the check clearing system.
The term includes, without limitation,
a ‘‘remotely created check,’’ as defined
in Regulation CC, Availability of
Funds and Collection of Checks, 12 CFR
229.2(fff), but does not include a payment order cleared through an Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) Network or
subject to the Truth in Lending Act, 15
U.S.C. 1601 et seq., and Regulation Z, 12
CFR part 1026.
(dd) Seller means any person who, in
connection with a telemarketing transaction, provides, offers to provide, or
arranges for others to provide goods or
services to the customer in exchange
for consideration.
(ee) State means any state of the
United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana
Islands, and any territory or possession
of the United States.
(ff) Telemarketer means any person
who, in connection with telemarketing,
initiates or receives telephone calls to
or from a customer or donor.
(gg) Telemarketing means a plan, program, or campaign which is conducted

383

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00393

§ 310.3

16 CFR Ch. I (1–1–18 Edition)

to induce the purchase of goods or services or a charitable contribution, by
use of one or more telephones and
which involves more than one interstate telephone call. The term does not
include the solicitation of sales
through the mailing of a catalog
which: contains a written description
or illustration of the goods or services
offered for sale; includes the business
address of the seller; includes multiple
pages of written material or illustrations; and has been issued not less frequently than once a year, when the
person making the solicitation does
not solicit customers by telephone but
only receives calls initiated by customers in response to the catalog and
during those calls takes orders only
without further solicitation. For purposes of the previous sentence, the
term ‘‘further solicitation’’ does not
include providing the customer with
information about, or attempting to
sell, any other item included in the
same catalog which prompted the customer’s call or in a substantially similar catalog.
(hh) Upselling means soliciting the
purchase of goods or services following
an initial transaction during a single
telephone call. The upsell is a separate
telemarketing transaction, not a continuation of the initial transaction. An
‘‘external upsell’’ is a solicitation
made by or on behalf of a seller different from the seller in the initial
transaction, regardless of whether the
initial transaction and the subsequent
solicitation are made by the same telemarketer. An ‘‘internal upsell’’ is a solicitation made by or on behalf of the
same seller as in the initial transaction, regardless of whether the initial transaction and subsequent solicitation are made by the same telemarketer.
[75 FR 48516, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 80
FR 77557, Dec. 14, 2015]

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

§ 310.3 Deceptive telemarketing acts or
practices.
(a) Prohibited deceptive telemarketing
acts or practices. It is a deceptive telemarketing act or practice and a violation of this Rule for any seller or telemarketer to engage in the following
conduct:

(1) Before a customer consents to
pay 659 for goods or services offered,
failing to disclose truthfully, in a clear
and conspicuous manner, the following
material information:
(i) The total costs to purchase, receive, or use, and the quantity of, any
goods or services that are the subject
of the sales offer; 660
(ii) All material restrictions, limitations, or conditions to purchase, receive, or use the goods or services that
are the subject of the sales offer;
(iii) If the seller has a policy of not
making refunds, cancellations, exchanges, or repurchases, a statement
informing the customer that this is the
seller’s policy; or, if the seller or telemarketer makes a representation
about a refund, cancellation, exchange,
or repurchase policy, a statement of all
material terms and conditions of such
policy;
(iv) In any prize promotion, the odds
of being able to receive the prize, and,
if the odds are not calculable in advance, the factors used in calculating
the odds; that no purchase or payment
is required to win a prize or to participate in a prize promotion and that any
purchase or payment will not increase
the person’s chances of winning; and
the no-purchase/no-payment method of
participating in the prize promotion
with either instructions on how to participate or an address or local or tollfree telephone number to which customers may write or call for information on how to participate;
659 When a seller or telemarketer uses, or
directs a customer to use, a courier to transport payment, the seller or telemarketer
must make the disclosures required by
§ 310.3(a)(1) before sending a courier to pick
up payment or authorization for payment, or
directing a customer to have a courier pick
up payment or authorization for payment. In
the case of debt relief services, the seller or
telemarketer must make the disclosures required by § 310.3(a)(1) before the consumer enrolls in an offered program.
660 For offers of consumer credit products
subject to the Truth in Lending Act, 15
U.S.C. 1601 et seq., and Regulation Z, 12 CFR
226, compliance with the disclosure requirements under the Truth in Lending Act and
Regulation Z shall constitute compliance
with § 310.3(a)(1)(i) of this Rule.

384

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00394

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

Federal Trade Commission

§ 310.3

(v) All material costs or conditions
to receive or redeem a prize that is the
subject of the prize promotion;
(vi) In the sale of any goods or services represented to protect, insure, or
otherwise limit a customer’s liability
in the event of unauthorized use of the
customer’s credit card, the limits on a
cardholder’s liability for unauthorized
use of a credit card pursuant to 15
U.S.C. 1643;
(vii) If the offer includes a negative
option feature, all material terms and
conditions of the negative option feature, including, but not limited to, the
fact that the customer’s account will
be charged unless the customer takes
an affirmative action to avoid the
charge(s), the date(s) the charge(s) will
be submitted for payment, and the specific steps the customer must take to
avoid the charge(s); and
(viii) In the sale of any debt relief
service:
(A) the amount of time necessary to
achieve the represented results, and to
the extent that the service may include
a settlement offer to any of the customer’s creditors or debt collectors,
the time by which the debt relief service provider will make a bona fide settlement offer to each of them;
(B) to the extent that the service
may include a settlement offer to any
of the customer’s creditors or debt collectors, the amount of money or the
percentage of each outstanding debt
that the customer must accumulate before the debt relief service provider
will make a bona fide settlement offer
to each of them;
(C) to the extent that any aspect of
the debt relief service relies upon or results in the customer’s failure to make
timely payments to creditors or debt
collectors, that the use of the debt relief service will likely adversely affect
the customer’s creditworthiness, may
result in the customer being subject to
collections or sued by creditors or debt
collectors, and may increase the
amount of money the customer owes
due to the accrual of fees and interest;
and
(D) to the extent that the debt relief
service requests or requires the customer to place funds in an account at
an insured financial institution, that
the customer owns the funds held in

the account, the customer may withdraw from the debt relief service at any
time without penalty, and, if the customer withdraws, the customer must
receive all funds in the account, other
than funds earned by the debt relief
service
in
compliance
with
§ 310.4(a)(5)(i)(A) through (C).
(2) Misrepresenting, directly or by
implication, in the sale of goods or
services any of the following material
information:
(i) The total costs to purchase, receive, or use, and the quantity of, any
goods or services that are the subject
of a sales offer;
(ii) Any material restriction, limitation, or condition to purchase, receive,
or use goods or services that are the
subject of a sales offer;
(iii) Any material aspect of the performance, efficacy, nature, or central
characteristics of goods or services
that are the subject of a sales offer;
(iv) Any material aspect of the nature or terms of the seller’s refund,
cancellation, exchange, or repurchase
policies;
(v) Any material aspect of a prize
promotion including, but not limited
to, the odds of being able to receive a
prize, the nature or value of a prize, or
that a purchase or payment is required
to win a prize or to participate in a
prize promotion;
(vi) Any material aspect of an investment opportunity including, but not
limited to, risk, liquidity, earnings potential, or profitability;
(vii) A seller’s or telemarketer’s affiliation with, or endorsement or sponsorship by, any person or government
entity;
(viii) That any customer needs offered goods or services to provide protections a customer already has pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1643;
(ix) Any material aspect of a negative option feature including, but not
limited to, the fact that the customer’s
account will be charged unless the customer takes an affirmative action to
avoid the charge(s), the date(s) the
charge(s) will be submitted for payment, and the specific steps the customer must take to avoid the
charge(s); or

385

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00395

§ 310.3

16 CFR Ch. I (1–1–18 Edition)

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

(x) Any material aspect of any debt
relief service, including, but not limited to, the amount of money or the
percentage of the debt amount that a
customer may save by using such service; the amount of time necessary to
achieve the represented results; the
amount of money or the percentage of
each outstanding debt that the customer must accumulate before the provider of the debt relief service will initiate attempts with the customer’s
creditors or debt collectors or make a
bona fide offer to negotiate, settle, or
modify the terms of the customer’s
debt; the effect of the service on a customer’s creditworthiness; the effect of
the service on collection efforts of the
customer’s creditors or debt collectors;
the percentage or number of customers
who attain the represented results; and
whether a debt relief service is offered
or provided by a non-profit entity.
(3) Causing billing information to be
submitted for payment, or collecting or
attempting to collect payment for
goods or services or a charitable contribution, directly or indirectly, without the customer’s or donor’s express
verifiable authorization, except when
the method of payment used is a credit
card subject to protections of the
Truth in Lending Act and Regulation
Z,661 or a debit card subject to the protections of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E.662 Such authorization shall be deemed verifiable
if any of the following means is employed:
(i) Express written authorization by
the customer or donor, which includes
the customer’s or donor’s signature;663
(ii) Express oral authorization which
is audio-recorded and made available
upon request to the customer or donor,
and the customer’s or donor’s bank or
other billing entity, and which evidences clearly both the customer’s or
661 Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. 1601 et
seq., and Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 226.
662 Electronic Fund Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C.
1693 et seq., and Regulation E, 12 CFR part
205.
663 For purposes of this Rule, the term
‘‘signature’’ shall include an electronic or
digital form of signature, to the extent that
such form of signature is recognized as a
valid signature under applicable federal law
or state contract law.

donor’s authorization of payment for
the goods or services or charitable contribution that are the subject of the
telemarketing transaction and the customer’s or donor’s receipt of all of the
following information:
(A) An accurate description, clearly
and conspicuously stated, of the goods
or services or charitable contribution
for which payment authorization is
sought;
(B) The number of debits, charges, or
payments (if more than one);
(C) The date(s) the debit(s), charge(s),
or payment(s) will be submitted for
payment;
(D) The amount(s) of the debit(s),
charge(s), or payment(s);
(E) The customer’s or donor’s name;
(F) The customer’s or donor’s billing
information, identified with sufficient
specificity such that the customer or
donor understands what account will
be used to collect payment for the
goods or services or charitable contribution that are the subject of the
telemarketing transaction;
(G) A telephone number for customer
or donor inquiry that is answered during normal business hours; and
(H) The date of the customer’s or donor’s oral authorization; or
(iii) Written confirmation of the
transaction, identified in a clear and
conspicuous manner as such on the
outside of the envelope, sent to the
customer or donor via first class mail
prior to the submission for payment of
the customer’s or donor’s billing information, and that includes all of the information
contained
in
§§ 310.3(a)(3)(ii)(A)-(G) and a clear and
conspicuous statement of the procedures by which the customer or donor
can obtain a refund from the seller or
telemarketer or charitable organization in the event the confirmation is
inaccurate; provided, however, that
this means of authorization shall not
be deemed verifiable in instances in
which goods or services are offered in a
transaction involving a free-to-pay
conversion and preacquired account information.
(4) Making a false or misleading
statement to induce any person to pay
for goods or services or to induce a
charitable contribution.

386

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00396

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

Federal Trade Commission

§ 310.4

(b) Assisting and facilitating. It is a deceptive telemarketing act or practice
and a violation of this Rule for a person to provide substantial assistance or
support to any seller or telemarketer
when that person knows or consciously
avoids knowing that the seller or telemarketer is engaged in any act or practice that violates §§ 310.3(a), (c) or (d),
or § 310.4 of this Rule.
(c) Credit card laundering. Except as
expressly permitted by the applicable
credit card system, it is a deceptive
telemarketing act or practice and a
violation of this Rule for:
(1) A merchant to present to or deposit into, or cause another to present
to or deposit into, the credit card system for payment, a credit card sales
draft generated by a telemarketing
transaction that is not the result of a
telemarketing credit card transaction
between the cardholder and the merchant;
(2) Any person to employ, solicit, or
otherwise cause a merchant, or an employee, representative, or agent of the
merchant, to present to or deposit into
the credit card system for payment, a
credit card sales draft generated by a
telemarketing transaction that is not
the result of a telemarketing credit
card transaction between the cardholder and the merchant; or
(3) Any person to obtain access to the
credit card system through the use of a
business relationship or an affiliation
with a merchant, when such access is
not authorized by the merchant agreement or the applicable credit card system.
(d) Prohibited deceptive acts or practices in the solicitation of charitable contributions. It is a fraudulent charitable
solicitation, a deceptive telemarketing
act or practice, and a violation of this
Rule for any telemarketer soliciting
charitable contributions to misrepresent, directly or by implication, any of
the following material information:
(1) The nature, purpose, or mission of
any entity on behalf of which a charitable contribution is being requested;
(2) That any charitable contribution
is tax deductible in whole or in part;
(3) The purpose for which any charitable contribution will be used;
(4) The percentage or amount of any
charitable contribution that will go to

a charitable organization or to any
particular charitable program;
(5) Any material aspect of a prize
promotion including, but not limited
to: the odds of being able to receive a
prize; the nature or value of a prize; or
that a charitable contribution is required to win a prize or to participate
in a prize promotion; or
(6) A charitable organization’s or
telemarketer’s affiliation with, or endorsement or sponsorship by, any person or government entity.
[75 FR 48516, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 80
FR 77558, Dec. 14, 2015]

§ 310.4 Abusive telemarketing acts or
practices.
(a) Abusive conduct generally. It is an
abusive telemarketing act or practice
and a violation of this Rule for any
seller or telemarketer to engage in the
following conduct:
(1) Threats, intimidation, or the use
of profane or obscene language;
(2) Requesting or receiving payment
of any fee or consideration for goods or
services represented to remove derogatory information from, or improve, a
person’s credit history, credit record,
or credit rating until:
(i) The time frame in which the seller
has represented all of the goods or
services will be provided to that person
has expired; and
(ii) The seller has provided the person
with documentation in the form of a
consumer report from a consumer reporting agency demonstrating that the
promised results have been achieved,
such report having been issued more
than six months after the results were
achieved. Nothing in this Rule should
be construed to affect the requirement
in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15
U.S.C. 1681, that a consumer report
may only be obtained for a specified
permissible purpose;
(3) Requesting or receiving payment
of any fee or consideration from a person for goods or services represented to
recover or otherwise assist in the return of money or any other item of
value paid for by, or promised to, that
person in a previous transaction, until
seven (7) business days after such
money or other item is delivered to
that person. This provision shall not

387

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00397

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

§ 310.4

16 CFR Ch. I (1–1–18 Edition)

apply to goods or services provided to a
person by a licensed attorney;
(4) Requesting or receiving payment
of any fee or consideration in advance
of obtaining a loan or other extension
of credit when the seller or telemarketer has guaranteed or represented a high likelihood of success in
obtaining or arranging a loan or other
extension of credit for a person;
(5)(i) Requesting or receiving payment of any fee or consideration for
any debt relief service until and unless:
(A) The seller or telemarketer has renegotiated, settled, reduced, or otherwise altered the terms of at least one
debt pursuant to a settlement agreement, debt management plan, or other
such valid contractual agreement executed by the customer;
(B) The customer has made at least
one payment pursuant to that settlement agreement, debt management
plan, or other valid contractual agreement between the customer and the
creditor or debt collector; and
(C) To the extent that debts enrolled
in a service are renegotiated, settled,
reduced, or otherwise altered individually, the fee or consideration either:
(1) Bears the same proportional relationship to the total fee for renegotiating, settling, reducing, or altering
the terms of the entire debt balance as
the individual debt amount bears to
the entire debt amount. The individual
debt amount and the entire debt
amount are those owed at the time the
debt was enrolled in the service; or
(2) Is a percentage of the amount
saved as a result of the renegotiation,
settlement, reduction, or alteration.
The percentage charged cannot change
from one individual debt to another.
The amount saved is the difference between the amount owed at the time the
debt was enrolled in the service and the
amount actually paid to satisfy the
debt.
(ii) Nothing in § 310.4(a)(5)(i) prohibits
requesting or requiring the customer
to place funds in an account to be used
for the debt relief provider’s fees and
for payments to creditors or debt collectors in connection with the renegotiation, settlement, reduction, or other
alteration of the terms of payment or
other terms of a debt, provided that:

(A) The funds are held in an account
at an insured financial institution;
(B) The customer owns the funds held
in the account and is paid accrued interest on the account, if any;
(C) The entity administering the account is not owned or controlled by, or
in any way affiliated with, the debt relief service;
(D) The entity administering the account does not give or accept any
money or other compensation in exchange for referrals of business involving the debt relief service; and
(E) The customer may withdraw from
the debt relief service at any time
without penalty, and must receive all
funds in the account, other than funds
earned by the debt relief service in
compliance
with
§ 310.4(a)(5)(i)(A)
through (C), within seven (7) business
days of the customer’s request.
(6) Disclosing or receiving, for consideration, unencrypted consumer account numbers for use in telemarketing; provided, however, that
this paragraph shall not apply to the
disclosure or receipt of a customer’s or
donor’s billing information to process a
payment for goods or services or a
charitable contribution pursuant to a
transaction;
(7) Causing billing information to be
submitted for payment, directly or indirectly, without the express informed
consent of the customer or donor. In
any telemarketing transaction, the
seller or telemarketer must obtain the
express informed consent of the customer or donor to be charged for the
goods or services or charitable contribution and to be charged using the
identified account. In any telemarketing
transaction
involving
preacquired account information, the
requirements in paragraphs (a)(7)(i)
through (ii) of this section must be met
to evidence express informed consent.
(i) In any telemarketing transaction
involving preacquired account information and a free-to-pay conversion feature, the seller or telemarketer must:
(A) Obtain from the customer, at a
minimum, the last four (4) digits of the
account number to be charged;
(B) Obtain from the customer his or
her express agreement to be charged
for the goods or services and to be

388

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00398

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

Federal Trade Commission

§ 310.4

charged using the account number pursuant to paragraph (a)(7)(i)(A) of this
section; and,
(C) Make and maintain an audio recording of the entire telemarketing
transaction.
(ii) In any other telemarketing transaction involving preacquired account
information not described in paragraph
(a)(7)(i) of this section, the seller or
telemarketer must:
(A) At a minimum, identify the account to be charged with sufficient
specificity for the customer or donor to
understand what account will be
charged; and
(B) Obtain from the customer or
donor his or her express agreement to
be charged for the goods or services
and to be charged using the account
number identified pursuant to paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(A) of this section;
(8) Failing to transmit or cause to be
transmitted the telephone number,
and, when made available by the telemarketer’s carrier, the name of the
telemarketer, to any caller identification service in use by a recipient of a
telemarketing call; provided that it
shall not be a violation to substitute
(for the name and phone number used
in, or billed for, making the call) the
name of the seller or charitable organization on behalf of which a telemarketing call is placed, and the seller’s or charitable organization’s customer or donor service telephone number, which is answered during regular
business hours;
(9) Creating or causing to be created,
directly or indirectly, a remotely created payment order as payment for
goods or services offered or sold
through telemarketing or as a charitable contribution solicited or sought
through telemarketing; or
(10) Accepting from a customer or
donor, directly or indirectly, a cash-tocash money transfer or cash reload
mechanism as payment for goods or
services offered or sold through telemarketing or as a charitable contribution solicited or sought through telemarketing.
(b) Pattern of calls. (1) It is an abusive
telemarketing act or practice and a
violation of this Rule for a telemarketer to engage in, or for a seller

to cause a telemarketer to engage in,
the following conduct:
(i) Causing any telephone to ring, or
engaging any person in telephone conversation, repeatedly or continuously
with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass
any person at the called number;
(ii) Denying or interfering in any
way, directly or indirectly, with a person’s right to be placed on any registry
of names and/or telephone numbers of
persons who do not wish to receive outbound telephone calls established to
comply with paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(A) of
this section, including, but not limited
to, harassing any person who makes
such a request; hanging up on that person; failing to honor the request; requiring the person to listen to a sales
pitch before accepting the request; assessing a charge or fee for honoring the
request; requiring a person to call a
different number to submit the request; and requiring the person to identify the seller making the call or on
whose behalf the call is made;
(iii) Initiating any outbound telephone call to a person when:
(A) That person previously has stated
that he or she does not wish to receive
an outbound telephone call made by or
on behalf of the seller whose goods or
services are being offered or made on
behalf of the charitable organization
for which a charitable contribution is
being solicited; or
(B) That person’s telephone number
is on the ‘‘do-not-call’’ registry, maintained by the Commission, of persons
who do not wish to receive outbound
telephone calls to induce the purchase
of goods or services unless the seller or
telemarketer:
(1) Can demonstrate that the seller
has obtained the express agreement, in
writing, of such person to place calls to
that person. Such written agreement
shall clearly evidence such person’s authorization that calls made by or on
behalf of a specific party may be placed
to that person, and shall include the
telephone number to which the calls
may be placed and the signature 664 of
that person; or
664 For purposes of this Rule, the term
‘‘signature’’ shall include an electronic or
digital form of signature, to the extent that
such form of signature is recognized as a

389

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00399

Continued

§ 310.4

16 CFR Ch. I (1–1–18 Edition)

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

(2) Can demonstrate that the seller
has an established business relationship with such person, and that person
has not stated that he or she does not
wish to receive outbound telephone
calls under paragraph (b)(1)(iii)(A) of
this section; or
(iv) Abandoning any outbound telephone call. An outbound telephone call
is ‘‘abandoned’’ under this section if a
person answers it and the telemarketer
does not connect the call to a sales representative within two (2) seconds of
the person’s completed greeting.
(v) Initiating any outbound telephone
call that delivers a prerecorded message, other than a prerecorded message
permitted for compliance with the call
abandonment
safe
harbor
in
§ 310.4(b)(4)(iii), unless:
(A) In any such call to induce the
purchase of any good or service, the
seller has obtained from the recipient
of the call an express agreement, in
writing, that:
(i) The seller obtained only after a
clear and conspicuous disclosure that
the purpose of the agreement is to authorize the seller to place prerecorded
calls to such person;
(ii) The seller obtained without requiring, directly or indirectly, that the
agreement be executed as a condition
of purchasing any good or service;
(iii) Evidences the willingness of the
recipient of the call to receive calls
that deliver prerecorded messages by
or on behalf of a specific seller; and
(iv) Includes such person’s telephone
number and signature;665 and
(B) In any such call to induce the
purchase of any good or service, or to
induce a charitable contribution from a
member of, or previous donor to, a nonprofit charitable organization on whose
behalf the call is made, the seller or
telemarketer:
(i) Allows the telephone to ring for at
least fifteen (15) seconds or four (4)
rings before disconnecting an unanswered call; and
valid signature under applicable federal law
or state contract law.
665 For purposes of this Rule, the term
‘‘signature’’ shall include an electronic or
digital form of signature, to the extent that
such form of signature is recognized as a
valid signature under applicable federal law
or state contract law.

(ii) Within two (2) seconds after the
completed greeting of the person
called, plays a prerecorded message
that promptly provides the disclosures
required by § 310.4(d) or (e), followed
immediately by a disclosure of one or
both of the following:
(A) In the case of a call that could be
answered in person by a consumer, that
the person called can use an automated
interactive voice and/or keypress-activated opt-out mechanism to assert a
Do Not Call request pursuant to
§ 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A) at any time during
the message. The mechanism must:
(1) Automatically add the number
called to the seller’s entity-specific Do
Not Call list;
(2) Once invoked, immediately disconnect the call; and
(3) Be available for use at any time
during the message; and
(B) In the case of a call that could be
answered by an answering machine or
voicemail service, that the person
called can use a toll-free telephone
number to assert a Do Not Call request
pursuant to § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A). The
number provided must connect directly
to an automated interactive voice or
keypress-activated opt-out mechanism
that:
(1) Automatically adds the number
called to the seller’s entity-specific Do
Not Call list;
(2)
Immediately
thereafter
disconnects the call; and
(3) Is accessible at any time throughout the duration of the telemarketing
campaign; and
(iii) Complies with all other requirements of this part and other applicable
federal and state laws.
(C) Any call that complies with all
applicable requirements of this paragraph (v) shall not be deemed to violate
§ 310.4(b)(1)(iv) of this part.
(D) This paragraph (v) shall not apply
to any outbound telephone call that delivers a prerecorded healthcare message made by, or on behalf of, a covered
entity or its business associate, as
those terms are defined in the HIPAA
Privacy Rule, 45 CFR 160.103.
(2) It is an abusive telemarketing act
or practice and a violation of this Rule
for any person to sell, rent, lease, purchase, or use any list established to
comply with § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A), or

390

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00400

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

Federal Trade Commission

§ 310.4

maintained by the Commission pursuant to § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B), for any purpose except compliance with the provisions of this Rule or otherwise to prevent telephone calls to telephone numbers on such lists.
(3) A seller or telemarketer will not
be liable for violating § 310.4(b)(1)(ii)
and (iii) if it can demonstrate that, as
part of the seller’s or telemarketer’s
routine business practice:
(i) It has established and implemented written procedures to comply
with § 310.4(b)(1)(ii) and (iii);
(ii) It has trained its personnel, and
any entity assisting in its compliance,
in the procedures established pursuant
to § 310.4(b)(3)(i);
(iii) The seller, or a telemarketer or
another person acting on behalf of the
seller or charitable organization, has
maintained and recorded a list of telephone numbers the seller or charitable
organization may not contact, in compliance with § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A);
(iv) The seller or a telemarketer uses
a process to prevent telemarketing to
any telephone number on any list established pursuant to § 310.4(b)(3)(iii) or
310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B), employing a version
of the ‘‘do-not-call’’ registry obtained
from the Commission no more than
thirty-one (31) days prior to the date
any call is made, and maintains
records documenting this process;
(v) The seller or a telemarketer or
another person acting on behalf of the
seller or charitable organization, monitors and enforces compliance with the
procedures established pursuant to
§ 310.4(b)(3)(i); and
(vi) Any subsequent call otherwise
violating paragraph (b)(1)(ii) or (iii) of
this section is the result of error and
not of failure to obtain any information necessary to comply with a request
pursuant
to
paragraph
(b)(1)(iii)(A) of this section not to receive further calls by or on behalf of a
seller or charitable organization.
(4) A seller or telemarketer will not
be liable for violating § 310.4(b)(1)(iv) if:
(i) The seller or telemarketer employs technology that ensures abandonment of no more than three (3) percent of all calls answered by a person,
measured over the duration of a single
calling campaign, if less than 30 days,
or separately over each successive 30-

day period or portion thereof that the
campaign continues.
(ii) The seller or telemarketer, for
each telemarketing call placed, allows
the telephone to ring for at least fifteen (15) seconds or four (4) rings before
disconnecting an unanswered call;
(iii) Whenever a sales representative
is not available to speak with the person answering the call within two (2)
seconds after the person’s completed
greeting, the seller or telemarketer
promptly plays a recorded message
that states the name and telephone
number of the seller on whose behalf
the call was placed666; and
(iv) The seller or telemarketer, in accordance with § 310.5(b)-(d), retains
records establishing compliance with
§ 310.4(b)(4)(i)-(iii).
(c) Calling time restrictions. Without
the prior consent of a person, it is an
abusive telemarketing act or practice
and a violation of this Rule for a telemarketer to engage in outbound telephone calls to a person’s residence at
any time other than between 8:00 a.m.
and 9:00 p.m. local time at the called
person’s location.
(d) Required oral disclosures in the sale
of goods or services. It is an abusive telemarketing act or practice and a violation of this Rule for a telemarketer in
an outbound telephone call or internal
or external upsell to induce the purchase of goods or services to fail to disclose truthfully, promptly, and in a
clear and conspicuous manner to the
person receiving the call, the following
information:
(1) The identity of the seller;
(2) That the purpose of the call is to
sell goods or services;
(3) The nature of the goods or services; and
(4) That no purchase or payment is
necessary to be able to win a prize or
participate in a prize promotion if a
prize promotion is offered and that any
purchase or payment will not increase
the person’s chances of winning. This
disclosure must be made before or in
conjunction with the description of the
prize to the person called. If requested
666 This provision does not affect any seller’s or telemarketer’s obligation to comply
with relevant state and federal laws, including but not limited to the TCPA, 47 U.S.C.
227, and 47 CFR part 64.1200.

391

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00401

§ 310.5

16 CFR Ch. I (1–1–18 Edition)

by that person, the telemarketer must
disclose the no-purchase/no-payment
entry method for the prize promotion;
provided, however, that, in any internal upsell for the sale of goods or services, the seller or telemarketer must
provide the disclosures listed in this
section only to the extent that the information in the upsell differs from the
disclosures provided in the initial telemarketing transaction.
(e) Required oral disclosures in charitable solicitations. It is an abusive telemarketing act or practice and a violation of this Rule for a telemarketer, in
an outbound telephone call to induce a
charitable contribution, to fail to disclose truthfully, promptly, and in a
clear and conspicuous manner to the
person receiving the call, the following
information:
(1) The identity of the charitable organization on behalf of which the request is being made; and
(2) That the purpose of the call is to
solicit a charitable contribution.
[75 FR 48516, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 76
FR 58716, Sept. 22, 2011; 80 FR 77559, Dec. 14,
2015]

§ 310.5 Recordkeeping requirements.
(a) Any seller or telemarketer shall
keep, for a period of 24 months from
the date the record is produced, the following records relating to its telemarketing activities:
(1) All substantially different advertising,
brochures,
telemarketing
scripts, and promotional materials;
(2) The name and last known address
of each prize recipient and the prize
awarded for prizes that are represented, directly or by implication, to
have a value of $25.00 or more;
(3) The name and last known address
of each customer, the goods or services
purchased, the date such goods or services were shipped or provided, and the
amount paid by the customer for the
goods or services;667
(4) The name, any fictitious name
used, the last known home address and

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

667

For offers of consumer credit products
subject to the Truth in Lending Act, 15
U.S.C. 1601 et seq., and Regulation Z, 12 CFR
226, compliance with the recordkeeping requirements under the Truth in Lending Act,
and Regulation Z, shall constitute compliance with § 310.5(a)(3) of this Rule.

telephone number, and the job title(s)
for all current and former employees
directly involved in telephone sales or
solicitations; provided, however, that if
the seller or telemarketer permits fictitious names to be used by employees,
each fictitious name must be traceable
to only one specific employee; and
(5) All verifiable authorizations or
records of express informed consent or
express agreement required to be provided or received under this Rule.
(b) A seller or telemarketer may
keep the records required by § 310.5(a)
in any form, and in the same manner,
format, or place as they keep such
records in the ordinary course of business. Failure to keep all records required by § 310.5(a) shall be a violation
of this Rule.
(c) The seller and the telemarketer
calling on behalf of the seller may, by
written agreement, allocate responsibility between themselves for the recordkeeping required by this Section.
When a seller and telemarketer have
entered into such an agreement, the
terms of that agreement shall govern,
and the seller or telemarketer, as the
case may be, need not keep records
that duplicate those of the other. If the
agreement is unclear as to who must
maintain any required record(s), or if
no such agreement exists, the seller
shall be responsible for complying with
§§ 310.5(a)(1)-(3) and (5); the telemarketer shall be responsible for complying with § 310.5(a)(4).
(d) In the event of any dissolution or
termination of the seller’s or telemarketer’s business, the principal of
that seller or telemarketer shall maintain all records as required under this
section. In the event of any sale, assignment, or other change in ownership
of the seller’s or telemarketer’s business, the successor business shall maintain all records required under this section.
§ 310.6

Exemptions.

(a) Solicitations to induce charitable
contributions via outbound telephone
calls
are
not
covered
by
§ 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B) of this Rule.
(b) The following acts or practices
are exempt from this Rule:

392

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00402

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

Federal Trade Commission

§ 310.7

(1) The sale of pay-per-call services
subject to the Commission’s Rule entitled ‘‘Trade Regulation Rule Pursuant
to the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act of 1992,’’ 16 CFR
part 308, provided, however, that this
exemption does not apply to the requirements of §§ 310.4(a)(1), (a)(7), (b),
and (c);
(2) The sale of franchises subject to
the Commission’s Rule entitled ‘‘Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions
Concerning Franchising,’’ (‘‘Franchise
Rule’’) 16 CFR part 436, and the sale of
business opportunities subject to the
Commission’s Rule entitled ‘‘Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions
Concerning Business Opportunities,’’
(‘‘Business Opportunity Rule’’) 16 CFR
part 437, provided, however, that this
exemption does not apply to the requirements of §§ 310.4(a)(1), (a)(7), (b),
and (c);
(3) Telephone calls in which the sale
of goods or services or charitable solicitation is not completed, and payment
or authorization of payment is not required, until after a face-to-face sales
or donation presentation by the seller
or charitable organization, provided,
however, that this exemption does not
apply
to
the
requirements
of
§§ 310.4(a)(1), (a)(7), (b), and (c);
(4) Telephone calls initiated by a customer or donor that are not the result
of any solicitation by a seller, charitable organization, or telemarketer,
provided, however, that this exemption
does not apply to any instances of
upselling included in such telephone
calls;
(5) Telephone calls initiated by a customer or donor in response to an advertisement through any medium, other
than direct mail solicitation, provided,
however, that this exemption does not
apply to:
(i) Calls initiated by a customer or
donor in response to an advertisement
relating to investment opportunities,
debt relief services, business opportunities other than business arrangements
covered by the Franchise Rule or Business Opportunity Rule, or advertisements involving offers for goods or
services described in § 310.3(a)(1)(vi) or
§ 310.4(a)(2) through (4);
(ii) The requirements of § 310.4(a)(9)
or (10); or

(iii) Any instances of upselling included in such telephone calls;
(6) Telephone calls initiated by a customer or donor in response to a direct
mail solicitation, including solicitations via the U.S. Postal Service, facsimile transmission, electronic mail,
and other similar methods of delivery
in which a solicitation is directed to
specific address(es) or person(s), that
clearly, conspicuously, and truthfully
discloses all material information listed in § 310.3(a)(1), for any goods or services offered in the direct mail solicitation, and that contains no material
misrepresentation regarding any item
contained in § 310.3(d) for any requested
charitable contribution; provided, however, that this exemption does not
apply to:
(i) Calls initiated by a customer in
response to a direct mail solicitation
relating to prize promotions, investment opportunities, debt relief services, business opportunities other than
business arrangements covered by the
Franchise Rule or Business Opportunity Rule, or goods or services described in § 310.3(a)(1)(vi) or § 310.4(a)(2)
through (4);
(ii) The requirements of § 310.4(a)(9)
or (10); or
(iii) Any instances of upselling included in such telephone calls; and
(7) Telephone calls between a telemarketer and any business to induce
the purchase of goods or services or a
charitable contribution by the business, except calls to induce the retail
sale of nondurable office or cleaning
supplies;
provided,
however,
that
§§ 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B) and 310.5 shall not
apply to sellers or telemarketers of
nondurable office or cleaning supplies.
[75 FR 48516, Aug. 10, 2010, as amended at 80
FR 77559, Dec. 14, 2015]

§ 310.7 Actions by states and private
persons.
(a) Any attorney general or other officer of a state authorized by the state
to bring an action under the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and
Abuse Prevention Act, and any private
person who brings an action under that
Act, shall serve written notice of its
action on the Commission, if feasible,
prior to its initiating an action under
this Rule. The notice shall be sent to

393

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00403

§ 310.8

16 CFR Ch. I (1–1–18 Edition)

the Office of the Director, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, Washington, DC 20580, and
shall include a copy of the state’s or
private person’s complaint and any
other pleadings to be filed with the
court. If prior notice is not feasible,
the state or private person shall serve
the Commission with the required notice immediately upon instituting its
action.
(b) Nothing contained in this Section
shall prohibit any attorney general or
other authorized state official from
proceeding in state court on the basis
of an alleged violation of any civil or
criminal statute of such state.

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

§ 310.8 Fee for access to the National
Do Not Call Registry.
(a) It is a violation of this Rule for
any seller to initiate, or cause any
telemarketer to initiate, an outbound
telephone call to any person whose
telephone number is within a given
area code unless such seller, either directly or through another person, first
has paid the annual fee, required by
§ 310.8(c), for access to telephone numbers within that area code that are included in the National Do Not Call
Registry maintained by the Commission under § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B); provided,
however, that such payment is not necessary if the seller initiates, or causes
a telemarketer to initiate, calls solely
to
persons
pursuant
to
§§ 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B)(i) or (ii), and the
seller does not access the National Do
Not Call Registry for any other purpose.
(b) It is a violation of this Rule for
any telemarketer, on behalf of any seller, to initiate an outbound telephone
call to any person whose telephone
number is within a given area code unless that seller, either directly or
through another person, first has paid
the annual fee, required by § 310.8(c),
for access to the telephone numbers
within that area code that are included
in the National Do Not Call Registry;
provided, however, that such payment
is not necessary if the seller initiates,
or causes a telemarketer to initiate,
calls solely to persons pursuant to
§§ 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B)(i) or (ii), and the
seller does not access the National Do

Not Call Registry for any other purpose.
(c) The annual fee, which must be
paid by any person prior to obtaining
access to the National Do Not Call
Registry, is $62 for each area code of
data accessed, up to a maximum of
$17,021; provided, however, that there
shall be no charge to any person for accessing the first five area codes of data,
and provided further, that there shall be
no charge to any person engaging in or
causing others to engage in outbound
telephone calls to consumers and who
is accessing area codes of data in the
National Do Not Call Registry if the
person is permitted to access, but is
not required to access, the National Do
Not Call Registry under this Rule, 47
CFR 64.1200, or any other Federal regulation or law. No person may participate in any arrangement to share the
cost of accessing the National Do Not
Call Registry, including any arrangement with any telemarketer or service
provider to divide the costs to access
the registry among various clients of
that telemarketer or service provider.
(d) Each person who pays, either directly or through another person, the
annual fee set forth in paragraph (c) of
this section, each person excepted
under paragraph (c) from paying the
annual fee, and each person excepted
from paying an annual fee under
§ 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B), will be provided a
unique account number that will allow
that person to access the registry data
for the selected area codes at any time
for the twelve month period beginning
on the first day of the month in which
the person paid the fee (‘‘the annual period’’). To obtain access to additional
area codes of data during the first six
months of the annual period, each person required to pay the fee under paragraph (c) of this section must first pay
$62 for each additional area code of
data not initially selected. To obtain
access to additional area codes of data
during the second six months of the annual period, each person required to
pay the fee under paragraph (c) of this
section must first pay $31 for each additional area code of data not initially
selected. The payment of the additional fee will permit the person to access the additional area codes of data
for the remainder of the annual period.

394

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00404

Federal Trade Commission

§ 311.4

(e) Access to the National Do Not
Call Registry is limited to telemarketers, sellers, others engaged in or
causing others to engage in telephone
calls to consumers, service providers
acting on behalf of such persons, and
any government agency that has law
enforcement authority. Prior to accessing the National Do Not Call Registry,
a person must provide the identifying
information required by the operator of
the registry to collect the fee, and
must certify, under penalty of law,
that the person is accessing the registry solely to comply with the provisions of this Rule or to otherwise prevent telephone calls to telephone numbers on the registry. If the person is accessing the registry on behalf of sellers, that person also must identify
each of the sellers on whose behalf it is
accessing the registry, must provide
each seller’s unique account number
for access to the national registry, and
must certify, under penalty of law,
that the sellers will be using the information gathered from the registry
solely to comply with the provisions of
this Rule or otherwise to prevent telephone calls to telephone numbers on
the registry.
[75 FR 48516, Aug. 10, 2010; 75 FR 51934, Aug.
24, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 51697, Aug. 27,
2012; 78 FR 53643, Aug. 30, 2013; 79 FR 51478,
Aug. 29, 2014; 80 FR 77560, Dec. 14, 2016; 81 FR
59845, Aug. 31, 2016; 82 FR 39534, Aug. 21, 2017]

kpayne on DSK54DXVN1OFR with $$_JOB

§ 310.9 Severability.
The provisions of this Rule are separate and severable from one another. If
any provision is stayed or determined
to be invalid, it is the Commission’s intention that the remaining provisions
shall continue in effect.

395

VerDate Sep2014

14:29 Mar 27, 2018

Jkt 244054

PO 00000

Attachment
A
Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\16\16V1.TXT 31

Frm 00405

Appendix B
(Educare Amended Complaint)

Qf'Pf..·tVtU

~!~½n.9-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 1 of 39

OEC 0·2 20,9
. ' ..,1..\:RK­
. · .,{ cfFTfXAS
I

UNITED STA'rES DISTRICJ' COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS

I1edctal Trade Co,cnmission, and
3

4

State of Ohio ex rel ,Attomey (;eneml
Dave :Yost,

5
6
7

8

9
10

lJ

No. 3:19-CV-196
..

•,·•

Plaintiffs,

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
FOR PERMANENT
INJUNCTION AND OTHER
EQUITABLE RELIEF

v.

:Edtic:ate"Centre ·s ervices, Inc., a New
Jersey cotporation, also dbP. Credit Cat:d
Services, Card Services, Credit C~rd
Financial Services, Care Net, Tripletcl
Inc., Revit Educ Srvc, L.L. Vision, Care
Value Services, and Card Value Services,
Tripletel, Inc., a Delawaxe corporation,

12

13
14

Prolink Vision, S.R.L:, a Dominican ·
Republic limited liability company,

15

9896988 Canada Inc., a Canadian
company,

16

Globex Telecom, Inc., a Nevada

corporation,

17
18
19

20

9506276 Canada, Inc., dba Globex
Telecom, Inc., a Canadian company,
Sam Madi, individually and as an owner,
officer, member, and/ or manager of
Educate Centre Services, Inc.,

21

22
23

24

25
26

27

28

Mohammad Souheil a/ k/ a
Mohammed Souheil and Mike
Souheil, individually and as an owner,
officet, member, and/ o.r manager of
E ducare Centre Services, Inc., 9896988
Canada, Inc., Globex Telecom, Inc.,
9506276 Canada, Inc., and Prolink
Vision, S.R.L.,

Wissam Abedel Jalil a / k / a Sam Jalll,
individually and as an owner, officer,
tnembet, and/ or manager of Tripletel,
Inc., and Prolink Vision, S.R.L,

1

..

";·

,.

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

1

Charles Kharouf, individually and as an

2

owner, officer, member, and/ or manager
of Educate Centre Services, Inc., and

3

1>ro1ink Vision, S.R.L.,

4

Filed 12/03/19 Page 2 of 39

Defendants.

5

6
7

8
9
IO

Plaintiffs, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and the Smte of Ohio, for their
First Amended Complaint ("FA Complaint") allege:
1.

The FTC brings this action under Sections 13(b) and 19 of the Federal Trade

Commission Act ("FTC Act''), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b, and the Telemarketing and Consutnet

11
Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act ("Telemarketing Act''), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6101 -6108, to obtain

12
13

temporary, preliminary, and permanent injunctive relief, rescission or reformation of

14

conl:J:acts, restitution, the refund of monies paid, disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, the

15

appointment of a receiver, an asset freeze, and other equitable relief for Defendants' acts or

16

practices in ,,io1ation of Section S(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4S(a), and in violation of

17

the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule ("TSR"), 16 C.F.R. Part 310.

18

19

20

2.

The State of Ohio, by and through its Attorney General, Dave Yost, brings

this action pursuant to the Telemarketing Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6103, the Ohio Consumer Sales

21

Practices Act ("CSPA''), 0.R.C. 1345.07, and the Ohio Telephone Solicitation Sales Act

22

("TSSA"), O.R.C. 4719.01 et seq., in order to obtain temporary, preliminary, and permanent

23

injunctive relief, consumer damages, and other equit:able relief from Defendants.

24

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

25

26
27

3.

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,

1337(a), 1345, and 1367.

28

2

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

1
2

4.

Venue is proper in this ilisttict under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (b)(2), (b)(3), ru1d (c),

and 15 U.S.C. § 53(b).

SUMMARY OF THE CASE

3
4

5

6

Filed 12/03/19 Page 3 of 39

5.

Si.nee at least Feb11.1ary 2016, Satn Maili, Mohammad Souheil (a/k/a

l\fohanuned Souheil and Mike Souheil) ("Souheil"), Wissam Abedel Jalil (a/k/a Sam Jalil),
Charles I the three-way calls that the Educare Defendants'

128.

telemarketets initiate with the consumers and the credit card issuing banks do not lead to the
ptomised substantial interest rate reduction, if any at all.

6
129.

In numerous instances, the Educate Defendants use the information they

7
8

obtain from consumers to 11pply on behalf of consumers, or advise the consumer to apply,

9

for new credit cards with low introductory rates (commonly known as "teaser rates") and

10

transfer their existing qedit card balances to those new cards.

11
12

For example, an Educare Defendants' telemarketer promised a consumer a

130.

new credit card with a 0% APR for 1 year and a 6.99% fixed tate theteafter, but the

13
consumer actually received a new credit card with a 0% APR for 9 months and over 20%

14

15
16

17

18
19

APR thereafter.
131.

In some instances, Educate Defendants' tele1m1tketers apply for new credit

cards with teaser rates on behalf of consumers without consumers' knowledge or consent.

132.

For exatnple, the consumet whose unsuccessful efforts to cancel the CCIRR

service are discussed in Paragraph 116 of this Complaint received an email from Experian

20
Ctedit Reporting stating that two credit card applications were submitted using his personal

21

22

information. Soon thereafter, the consumer recdved a telephone call from a representative

23

of Chase Bank seeking to verify his application for a credit card, which the consumer had ·no

24

prior knowledge of and did not authorize.

25

26

133.

The Educare Defendants' balance transfer tactic does not typically deliver the

promised substantfal rate reduction. Consumers often cannot qt1alify for the new credit

27

28

cards, and in any event, the reduced rates are only temporary aod commonly followed by
double-digit rates.

22

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALE:D* (Ex Parte)

134.

2
3

6

After securing the consumer's payment and failing to provide the promised

substantial rate reduction, the Educare Defendants often stop returning the consumer's
phone calls and otherwise cease communicating with the consumer.

4
5

Filed 12/03/19 Page 23 of 39

The Edi.1care Defenda11ts Routinely Refuse to I ssue Refunds
135.

In their sales pitches, the Educate Defendants' telemarketers routinely tout a

100% money-back guarantee if the Educare Defendants fail to deliver the promised

7

8

substantially lower credit card interest rate, or if the consumer is otherwise dissatisfied with

9

the CCJRR service,

10

136.

In numerous instances, the Educate Defendants do not honor the refund

11

promises. Instead, the Educate Defendants routinely make it extremely difficult, if not

12

impossible, for consumers to reach a representative via telephone to process refund requests.

13

137.

Many consumers have discovered that the contact number the Educare

14

15

16

Defendants' telemarkete1· provided is no longer in service.
138.

Consumers who have been able to reach a representative of the Educare

17

Defendants by telephone have 1·eported being strnng along with no refund or even partial

18

refund issued.

19

20

139.

For example, one consiuner made over 20 telephone calls· to Educate in an

effort to cancel the CCIRR service and get a refund, and spoke with various representatives

21

22
23

24
25

26

who were difficult to understand, evasive, condesceodiug, transferred her to a "manager"
that never answered the phone, or misrepresented tl1at Educare had delivered the promised
interest rate reduction even though it had not done so.
140.

In addition, Educate has routinely failed to respond to consumer complaints

and refund requests sent to it by the Bettet Business Bureau and state attorneys general.

27
28

23

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 "'SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 24 of 39

Tbe Educare Defendan.ts' Abusive Telemarketing Practices
2

141.

In numerous instances, the Educare Defendants, acting directly or thtough

3

one or moJ'e iutermediaries, have initiated telemarketing calls to consumers throughout the

4

United States that delivered a prerecorded message promoting the CCIRR service, without

5

first having obtained the consumct's signed express written agreement to receive such calls

6
by or on behalf of the Educate Defendants.
7

8

142.

In marketing the CCIRR service, in numerous instances, the Educare

9

Defendants, acting directly or through one or more intermediaries, have called telephone

10

numbers listed in various area codes throughout the United States, including telephone

11

numbets listed on the National Do Not Call Regist.cy maintained by the FTC, without tl1e

12

Educate Defendants' fu-st paying the annual fee for access to the telephone numbers within

13
such area codes.
14

15

143.

In numetous inswnces, the Educate Defendants have received fees they

16

caused ro be drawn from conswners' bank accounts during or immediately after the

17

telemarketing call offering the CCIRR service, but before the Educare Defendants had

18

undertaken any efforts to reduce the consumers' credit card foterest cates. This is illegal

19

under the TSR.

20
144.

lo numerous instances, the Educare Defendants, acting directly or ~ttough

21

22
23
24

25

26

one or more intermediaries, have caused the creation of RCPOs as payment for the CCIRR
service offered or sold through telemarketing.

The Globex Defendants Assisted and Facilit-.tted Educa1·e•i:; Telemad<eting Scheme
145.

The Globex Defendants provided substantial assistance to the Educare

Defendants by providing them with the means to call consumers throughout the United

27

28

States via interconnected VoIP communication services and facilities.

24

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

146.

2

Filed 12/03/19 Page 25 of 39

Since circa January 2016, the Globex Defendants and their owner and dcjado

principal, Souheil, knew or consciously avoided knowing that Educate was violating the TSR

3

in its telemarketing of ccnrn. senrices. Souheil and the Globex Defendants knew or

4

consciously avoiding knowing that, among other things, Educare:

5

A.

6

Mis.represented that consumers who purchase the CCIRR service (1)
would have their credit card interest rates reduced substantially; or

7
(2) would be entitled to a full 1'efund if the Educate Defendants

8

could not obtain a lower interest rate or if the consumer was not

9

completely satisfied with the CCIRR service;

10
11

B.

12

Created or caused to be created, directly or indirectly, a remotely
created payment order as payment for goods or services offered or

13

sold through telemarketing, during the time periods set forth in the

14
FA Complaint;

15
16

C.

Charged or received a fee in advance of providing debt relief service;

17

D.

Initiated outbound telephone calls that delivered unlawful;

18

prerecorded messages; or

19

E.

20

Failed to disclose the identity of the seller of the CCIRR service
truthfully, promptly, and in a dear and conspicuous manner to the

21
person receiving the call.

22
23

147.

Between January 2016 and November 2018, Educare caused more than $9.5

24

million in unreimbursed consumet harm to consumers in the United States. The Globex

25

Defendants are jointl)' and severally liable with the Educate Defendants for that harm, which

26

was caused by their provisiop of comtnunication setvices and facilities to the Educare.

27

28

25

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 26 of 39

Ohio1s 'telephone Solicitor's Registtation Requirement
2

148.

Ohio's Telephone Solicitation Sales Act, O.R.C. 4719.01 el seq., generally

3

requires telephone solicitors that make telephone solicitations to individuals in Ohio to

4

register with and file a copy of a surety bond with the Ohio Attorney General.

5
6

149.

Defendants Educare and Prolink have been solicitors tlU1t make telephone

solicitations to individuals in Ohio. Nevertheless, they have neither registered as telephone

7

8
9

solicitots with, nor provided a copy of a surety bond to, the Ohio Attorney General.

150,

Based on the facts and violations of law alleged in this Complaint, Plaintiffs

lO

have reason to believe that the Educare Defendants and the Glob ex Defendants are violating

11

or are about to violate laws enforced by the Commission and the Ohio Attorney General.

12
13

VIOLATIONS OF THE FTC ACT
151.

Section S(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), prohibits "unfair or deceptive

14

15

16
17

acts or practices in or affecting commerce."
152.

Misrepresentations or deceptive omissions of material fact constitute

deceptive acts or pl'actices prohibited by Section S(a) of the FTC Act. 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).

]8
19

COUNT ONE (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)
False or Unsubstantiated Credit Card Interest Rate Reduction and Refund Claims

20
153.

In numerous insta"nces, in connection with the advertising, marketing,

21

22

23
24

promotion, offering for sale, or sale of a debt relief service, the Educate Defendants have
tepresented, directly or indirectly, exptessly or by impliclltion, that:

A.

card interest rates .r educed substantially; and/or

25

26

27

Consumers who purchase the CCIRR service would have their credit

B.

Consumers who purchase the CCIRR service would be entitled to a
full refund if Defendants could not obtain a lower interest rate or if

28
the consumer was not completely satisfied with the CCIRR service.

26

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

1

2

154.

Filed 12/03/19 Page 27 of 39

[n Uuth and in fact, in numerous instances jn which the Educare Defendants

have made the representations set forth in Paragraph 153 of this Complaint:

A.

3

4

Consumers who purchase the CCIRR service do not have their credit
ca.rd interest rates reduced substantially; and/or

5

B.

Consumers who purchase the CCIIUt service and do not obtain a

6
lowet interest rate 01· are not completely satisfied with the CCIRR

7
service do not provided a full refund.

8
9

155.

Therefore, the Educare Defendants' representations as set forth in Paragraph

IO

153 of thh Complaint are false or misleading and constitute a deceptive act or practice in

11

violation of Sect.ion S(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).

12

THE TELEMARKETJNG SALES RULE

13
l 56.

In 1994, Congress directed the FTC to prescribe rules prohibiting abusive

14

15

and deceptive telemarketing acts or practices pursuant to the Telemarketing Act, 15 U.S.C. §§

16

6101-6108. The FTC adopted the original TSR fn 1995, extensh,ely amended it in 2003, and

17

amended certain sections thereafter.

18
. 19

157.

Defendants are all "sellers" or "telemMketers" engaged in "telemarketing" as

defined by the TSR, 16 C.ER. § 310.2(dd), (ff), and (,gg). For purposes of the TSR, a "seller"

20
is any person who, in connection with a telemarketing transaction, provides, offers to

21

22

provide, or arranges for others to provide goods or services to a customer in exchange for

23

consideration. 16 C.ER. § 310.2(dd). A "telemarketer" means any person who, in

24

connection with telemarketing, initiates or rece1ves telephone calls to or from 'a customer or

25

donor. 16 C.F.R. § 310.2(ft).

26
27

158.

"Telemarketing'' means a plan, program, or campaign which is conducted to

induce the purchase of goods or services or a charitable contribution, by use of one or tnore

28

27

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 28 of 39

telephones :md which involves more than one int~1-state telephone call. 16 C.F.ll. §

2
3

4
5

310.2(gg).
159.

The Educare Defendants are sellers or tele1narkete1:s of "debt relief services"

as defined by the TSR, 16 C.F.R. § 310.2(0). Unde.t: the TSR, a "debt relief service" is any
program or service represented, du:ectly or by implication, to renegotiate, settle, or in any

6
way alter the tertns of payment or other terms of the debt between a person and one or

7
8

more unsecured creditors, including, but not limited to, a reduction in the balance, interest

9

rate, or fees owed by a person to an unsecured creditor or debt collector. 16 C.F.R. §

10

310.2(0).

11
12
13

160.

The TSR prohibits sellets and telemarketers from misrepresenting, directly or

by implication, any tuaterial aspect of any debt-relief service, including but not limited to,
the amount of money or the percentage of the debt amount that a customer may -save by

14
15

16
17

18
19

using the service. 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(a)(2)(x).

161.

The TSR prohibits sellers and telemarketers from re<1uesti11g or receiving

payment of any fee or consideration for any debt relief service until and unless:
A. The seller or tdetnarketer has renegotiated, settled, reduced, or oth.e1wise
altered the terms of at least one debt pursuant to a settlement agreement,

20

debt management plan, or other such valid contractual agreement
21
22

executed by the customer;

23

B. The customer has made at least one payment pursuant to that settlement

24

agreement, debt management plan, or other valid contractual agreement

25

between the customer and the creditor or debt collector; and

26

C. To the extent that debts enrolled in a service are renegotiated; settled,

27
reduced, or othe1wise altered individually, the fee or consideration either:

28

28

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

1.

Filed 12/03/19 Page 29 of 39

Bears the same proportional relationship to the total fee for
renegotiating, settling, reducing, ot altering the tetms of the

2
3

entire debt balance as the individual debt amount bears to the

4

entil:e debt amount. The .individual debt amount and the entil:e

5

debt amount are those owed at the time the debt was enrolled in

6
the service~ or

7

ii. Is a percentage of the amount sa,,ed as a result of the
8
renegotiation, settlement, reduction, or alteration. The percentage

9
10

charged cannot change from one individual debt to another. The

11

amount saved is the difference between the amount owed at the

12

time the debt was entolled in the service and the amount actually

13

paid to satisfy the debt. 16 C.FR. § 310.4(a)(S)(i).

14

15

162.

The TSR prohibits sellers and telemarketei-s from creating or causing to be

16

created, directly or indirectly, a remotely created payment order as payment for goods or

17

services offered or sold through telemarketing. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(a)(9). A remotely created

18

payment order includes a remotely created check.16 C.f.R. § 310.2(cc).

19
20

163.

The 2003 amendments to the TSR established the National Do Not Call

Registry, maintained by the FTC, of consume.rs who do not wish to receive certain types of

21
22

23

24
25

26

telemarketing calls. Consumers can register their telephone numbers on the Registt}' without
charge either through a toll-free telephone call or over the Internet at www.donotcall.gov.
164.

The FTC allows sellers, telemarketers, and other permitted organizations to

access the Registry over the Internet at www.telemarketing.donotcall.gov, to pay any required
fee(s), and to download the numbers not to call.

27
165.

The TSR prohibits sellers and telemarketers from calling any telephone

28
number within a given area code unless the seller on whose behalf the call is made has paid

29

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

1

2
3
4

5
6

Filed 12/03/19 Page 30 of 39

the annual fee for access to the telephone numbers within that area code included in the
Registry. 16 C.F.R. § 310.8.

166.

The TSR prohibits sellers and telemarketers from initiating an outbound

telephone call to telephone numbers on the Registry. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B).
167.

The TSR prohibits initiating a telephone call tllil.t delivers a prerecorded

message to induce the purchase of any good or service unless the seller has obtained from

7
the recipient of the call an express agreement, in writing, that evidences the willingness of

8
9

10
11

12

13

the recipient of the call to receive calls that deliver prerecorded messages by or on behalf of
a specific seller. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(v)(A).
168.

The TSR tequires telemarketets in an outbound telephone call or internal or

external upsell to induce the purchase of goods or services to disclose the identity of the
seller ttuthfully, promptly, and in a clear and conspicuous manner to the person receiving the

14
15
16

call. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(d)(l ).

169.

It is a deceptive teletnarketing act or practice and a violation of this Rule for

17

a person to provide substantial assistance or support to any seller or telemarketer when that

18

person knows or consciously avoids !mowing that the seller or telemarketer is engaged in any

19

act or practice that violates Sections 310.3(a), (c) or (d) or Section 310.4 of this Rule. 16

20
C.F.R. § 310.3(b).
21

22

170.

Pursuant to Section 3(c) of the Telemarketing Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6102(c), and

23

Section 18(d)(3) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 57a(d)(3), a violation of the TSR constitutes an

24

unfair or deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce, in violation of Section S(a) of

25

the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(a).

26
27

28

30

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 31 of 39

VIOLATI ONS OF THE TELEMARKETING SALES RULE

l

2

(By the FTC- and the State of Ohio)

3

COUN'T TWO (EDU CARE DEFENDANTS)

4

Misrepresentations of Material Aspects of a Debt Relief Service

5

171.

In numerous instances since February 2016, in connection with the

6
telemarketing of a debt relief service, the Educate Defendants have misrepresented, directl}'

7

8

or by implication, material aspects of the service, mcluding, but not limited to, that:

A.

9

Consumers who purchase the CCIRR service would have their credit
card interest rates reduced substantially; and/ or

10
11

B.

12

Consumers who purchase the CCIRR service would be entitled to a
full refund if the Educate Defendants could not obtam a lower

13
interest rate or if the consumer was not completely satisfied with the

14
CCIRR service.

15

16

172. · The Educate Defendants' acts and practices, as set forth in Paragraph 171

17

above, are deceptive telemarketing acts or practices that violate the TSR, 16 C.F.R. §

18

310.3(a)(2)(x).

19

COUNT THREE (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)

20
Charging or Receiving a Fee in Advance of Providing

21
Debt Relief Service

22
23

'173.

In numerous instances since February 2016 in connection with the

24

telemarketing of a debt relief service, the Educare Defendants have requested or received

25

payment of a fee or consideration for a debt relief sexvice before: (a) they have

26

renegotiated, settled, reduced, ox otherwise altei:ed the tei:ms of at least one debt pui:suant to

27
a settlement agreement, debt management plan, or other such valid contractual agreement.

28

31

,.

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

1
2

3
4

5

Filed 12/03/19 Page 32 of 39

executed by the consumer; and (b) the consumer has made at least one payment purs1.1ant to
that agreement.
174.

The Educate Defendants' acts or practices, as set forth in Pamgraph 173

above, are abusive telemarketing acts or practices that violate the TSR, 16 C.F.R. §

310.4(a)(S)(i).

6
COUNT FOUR (EDU CARE DEFENDANTS)

7
Use of Remotely Created Payment Orders

8

in Connection with Telemarketing

9

10
11
12

. 175.

In numerous instances since June 13, 2016, the Educare Defendants have

created or caused to be created, directly or indirectly, a remotely created payment order as
payment for goods or services offered or sold through telemarketing.

13
176.

The Educare Defendants acts or practices, as set forth in Paragraph 175

14

15
16

above, are abusive telemarketing acts or practices that violate the TSR, 16 C.F.R. §
310.4(a)(9).

17

COUNT FIVE (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)

18

Initiating Unlawful Prerecorded Messages

19

177.

In numerous instances since February 2016, in connection witl1

20
telematketi.ng, the E ducate Defendants have engaged in, or caused a telemarketer to e ngage

21

22

23

in, initiating outbound telephone calls that deliver prerecorded messages in violation of the

TSR, 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(v)(A).

24

COUNT SIX (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)

25

Failing to Pay National Registry Fees

26

178.

In numerous instances since Febrm1ty 2016, in connection with

27
telemarketing, the Educare Defendants have .initiated, or caused others to initiate, an

28
outbound telephone call to a telephone number within a given area code when the Educate

32

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

1

Filed 12/03/19 Page 33 of 39

Defendants had not, either ditectly or th1'ough another person, paid the required nunual fee

2

for access to the telephone numbers within that area code that are included in the National

3

Do Not Call Registty, in violation of the TSR, 16 C.F.R. § 310.8.

4

COUNT SEVEN (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)

5

Failure to Make Oral Disclosures Required by the TSR

6
179.

In numerous instances since February 2016, in connection with

7

8

telemarketing, the Educate Defendants have initiated, or caused others to initiate, an

9

outbound telephone call to induce the purchase of a CCIRR service that failed to disclose

10

the identity of the sellet of the CCIRR service truthfully, promptly, and in a clear and

11

conspicuous manner to the person receiving the call, in violation of the TSR, 16 C.F.R.

12

§ 310.4(d)(D.

13

COUNT EIGHT (GLOBEX DEFENDANTS)

14
Assisting and Facilitating

15
16

180.

As .described in paragrap~1s 16-17, 42, 67, 82-83, 145-47, above, the Globex

17

Defendants have, in nw11erous instances, provided substantial assistance and support,

18

though the provision of communication services and facilities, to one or tnore sellers or

19

telemarketers, whom the Globex Defendants knew, or consciously avoided knowing, were

20
violating§§ 310.3(a)(2)(x), 310.4(a)(S)(i), 310.4(a)(9), 310.4(b)(l)(v)(A), and 310.4(d)(1) of the

21

22
23

24
25

26

TSR by:
A. Misrepresented that consumers who put:chase the CCIRR service
(1) would have their credit catd interest rates reduced substantially; or
(2) would be entitled to a full refund if the Educate Defendants could
not obtain ~ lower interest rate or if the consumer was not completely
satisfied witl1 the CCilUt service;

27

B. Charging or receiving a fee in advance of providing debt relief se1-vice;

28

C. Using RCPOs as payment for goods or services offered 01: sold through

telemarketing;
33

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 34 of 39

D. Initiating outbound telephone calls that deliver unlawful prerecorded

1
messages; or

2

E. Failing to disclose the identity of the sellet o f the CCIRR servke

3

truthfully, promptly, and in a clear and conspicuous manner to tl1e person

4

receiving the call.

5
6
7

181.

The Globex Defendants' acts or practices, as desctibed in Pamgraph 181

above, violate the TSR, 16 C.F.R.; § 310.3(b).

VIOLATIONS OF THE OHIO CONSUMER SALES PRACTICES ACT

8

(By the State of Ohio)

9
182.

Ohlo's CSPA, O.R.C. 1345.01 et seq., generally prohibits "suppliers" from

10
11

12

engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices in connection with "consumer ttansaccions."
183.

Defendants are "suppliers" as defined in O.R..C. 1345.01 (C) because they, at

13

all times relevant hereto, were engaged in the business of effecting or soliciting consumer

14

transactions, whether or not they dealt directly with consumers.

15

COUNT NINE (EDOCARE DEFENDANTS)

16
Failing to Deliver Seivices or Provide Refunds

17
18

184.

As described in paragraphs 16-149 above, the E ducate Defendants

19

committed unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation o f the Failure to Deliver Rule,

20

O.A.C. 109:4-3-09(A) and the CSPA, O.R.C. 1345.02(A), by accepting money from

21

consumers for goods or services, and specifically offering services to reduce the consumers'

22

credit card rates, and then permitting eight weeks to elapse without making shipment or

23

24
25

delivery of the goods or services ordered, making a full refund, advising the consumer of the
duration of an extended delay and offering to send a refund within two weeks if so

26

requested, or furnishing similar goods or se1-vices of equal or greater value as a good faith

27

substitute.

28

34

Case 3 :19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 35 of 39

COUNT TEN (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)
Misrepresenting Characteristics of the Transaction

2
3

4
5

6

185.

As described in paragraphs 16-149 above, the Educare Defendants

committed unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of the CSPA, O.R.C. 1345.02(A),

by 1n1srepresenting that the subject of a consumer u:ansaction has sponsorship, approval,
performance characteristics, uses, or benefits that it did not have, and specifically by (1)

7

8

misrepresenting that their services will substantially reduce consumers credit card .interest

9

rates, (2) misrepresenting that their setvices have a 100% money-back guarantee, and (3)

10

misrepresenting that they will send consumers a written agreement packet in the mail after

11

consumers agree to the service over the telephone.

12

13

COUN1' ELEVEN (EDUCARE DEFENDANT'S)
Using Remotely Created Payment Orders in Connection with Telemarketing

14
15
16

186.

As described in paragraphs 16-149 above, the Educate Defendants

committed unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of the CSPA, 0.R.C. 1345.02(A),

17

b)' creating or causing to be created, d.u:ectly or indirectly, a remotely created payment order

18

as payment for goods or services offered or sold through telemarketing.

19

VIOLATIONS OF THE OHIO TELEPHONE SOLICITATION SALES ACT

20

(by the State of Ohio)

21
22

187.

Defendants initiated "telephone solicitations" to "purchasers," as they were

23

at all times relevant herein, engaged in initiating "communications" on behalf of "telephone

24

solicitors" or "salespersons" to induce persons to purchases "goods or services," as those

25

terms are defined in the TSSA, 0.R.C. 4719.0t(A).

26
27

188.

Defendants are "telephone solicitors" as that term is defined in the TSSA,

O.R.C. 4719.01(A)(8), as they were at all ti.mes relevant herein, engaged in initiating

28

35

l

'

Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Docu ment 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 36 of 39

telephone solicitations directly or through one or more salespersons from a location in Ohio

2

or from a location outside of Ohio to persons in Ohio.

3

COUNT TWELVE (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)

4

Failure to Comply with Registration and Surety Bond Requirements

5

189.

6

As described in paragraphs 16-149 above, the Educate Defendants

committed unfair or deceptive acts and practices in violation of the TSSA, O.R.C.

7
8
9

4719.02(A) and 4719 .04(A), and the CSPA, O.R.C. 1345.02(A), by acting as a telephone
solicitor without first having obtained a cer tificate of registration from the Ohio Attorney

10

General, and filing a copy of a su.rety bond in the amount of at least fifty thousand dollars

11

with the Ohio Attorney General.

12

13

COUNT THIRTEEN (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)
Failure to Disclose the True Name of the Solicitor and Business

14

15

190.

As described in paragraphs 16-149 above, the Educare Defendants

16

committed unfair o.r deceptive acts and practices in violation of the TSSA, O.R.C.

17

4719.06(A) and the CSPA, O.R.C. 1345.02(A), by failing to disclose the solicitor's true natne

18

and the name of the company on ,vhose behalf solicitations were made, with.in the first sixty

19

I

seconds of the telephone call.

20
COUNT FOURTEEN (EDUCARE DEFENDANTS)

21

Failure to Obtain Signed Written Confirmation of Sales

22

23

191.

As described in paragraphs 16-149 above, the Educare Defendants

24

committed unfair or deceptive acts and practices in violation of the TSSA, O.R.C. 4719.07

25

and the CSPA, O.R.C. 1345.0Z(A), by taking payment from a consumer as the result of a

26

telephone solicitation and not providing to, ~d receiving back from the consumer, a written

27
confirmation that meets the requirements of O.R.C. 4719.07.

28

36

I.
I
I

' '

c ·ase 3:19-cv-00196-KC

Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 37 of 39

CONSUMER INJURY
2

192.

Consumers are suffering, have suffered, and will continue to suffer

3

substantial .injury as a result of Defendants' violations of the FTC Act, the TSR, the CSPA,

4

and the TSSA.

5

193.

The Educate Defendants' fraudulent telemarketing scheme has caused more

6
than $11 .5 million to be withdrawn from consumers' checking accounts. In addition,

7
8

Defendants have been unjustly enriched as a result of their unlawful acts or practices.

9

Absent injunctive relief by this Court, Defendants are likely to continue to injure consumers,

10

reap unjust encichment, and harm the public interest.

11

12

THIS COURT'S POWER 'rO GRANT RELIEF
194.

Section 13(b) of the FfC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), empowers this Court. to

13
grant injunctive and such other relief as the Court may deem appropriate to halt and redress

14
15

16

violations of an}' provision of law enforced by the FTC.

195.

The Court, in the exercise of its equitable ju11sdiccion, may award.ancillary

17

relief, including rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund of monies

18

paid, and the disgorgement of ill-gotten monies, to prevent and remedy any violation of any

19

provision of law enforced by the FTC.

20
196.

Pu.r suaut to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, this Court has supplemental jurisdiction to

21

22

allow PJa.iritiff State of Ohio, Office of Attorney Gene1-al, to enforce its state law claims

23

against Defendants in this Court for violations of the CSPA and th.e TSSA, including

24

injunctive relief,.tescission or reformation of contracts, the refund of monies paid; and the

25

disgorgement of ill-gotten monies.

26

27
28

PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs FTC and the State of Ohio, pursuant to Sections 13(b)
aud 19 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b), 57b; d1e TSR; Section 1345.07 of the Ohio

37

' Case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 38 of 39

CSPA; Section 4719.22 of the Ohio TSSA; and the Court's own equitable powers, request

2

that the Court:

3

A.

Award Plaintiffs such preliminary injunctive and ancillary relief as tnay be

4

necessary to avert the Wtelihood of consumer .inju1-y during the pendency of this action and

5

to preserve the possibility of effective final relief, including temporary and preliminary

6

injunctions, and an order providing for the turnover. of business records, an asset freeze,

7

immediate access, the appointment of a receiver, and disruption of telephone setvice;
B.

8

9

Entet a pe1·ma11ent injunction to prevent future violations of the FTC Act,

the TSR, the Ohio CSPA, and the Ohio TSSA by Defendants;
,

10

C.

Award Plaintiffs such relief as the Court finds necessary to redress injury to

11

consumers resulting from Defendants' violations of the FTC Act, the TSR, the Ohio CSPA,

12

and the Ohio TSSA, including rescission or reformation of contracts, restitution, the refund

13

of monies paid, and the disgorgetnent of ill-gotten monies; and

D.

14
15

Award Plaintiffs the costs of bringmg this action, as well as such other and

additional relief as the Court may determu1e to be just and proper;

16

Respectfully submitted,

17
18
19

20
21

22

23
24

25

Dated:
Chcistp

er E. Brown

J. Ronald Brooke, Jr.
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Mailstop CC-8528
Washington, DC 20580
(202) 326-2825 / cbrown3@ftc.gov
(202) 326-3484 / jbrooke@ftc.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

26
DAVE YOST
Ohio Attorney General

27
28

38

' '

·case 3:19-cv-00196-KC Document 81 *SEALED* (Ex Parte)

Filed 12/03/19 Page 39 of 39

1

2
Erin Leahy (Ohio Bar #69509)
Assistant A ttomeys Genecal
Consumer Protection Section
30 E. B:road Street, 14d' Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215 ·

3
4

5

(614) 466-8831

6

e.cin.leahy@OhioAttorneyGeneral.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff

7

STATE OF OHIO

8

9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STATE OF OHIO

-10
11

12
13
14

15
16
17

18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26
27
28

39

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Aftc%3A063fd350701bd470. Public record. Not legal advice.
