# Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

> Briefs, arguments, decisions, and more.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Aferc%3A0297b5fb6eb990d9

## Record

- **Collection:** Agency decision
- **Document type:** Agency decision

## Text

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices
service, go to the eSubscription link on
the FERC Internet Web site.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–8019 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 1390–040–CA]

Southern California Edison Company;
Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment
May 19, 2006.

In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s Regulations, 18 CFR Part
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the
Office of Energy Projects has reviewed
the Offer of Settlement (Settlement)
filed on February 4, 2005, including
proposed amended license conditions
for the Lundy Hydroelectric Project,
located on Mill Creek in Mono County,
near the town of Lee Vining and has
prepared an Environmental Assessment
(EA) for the proposed amendment.
The EA contains our analysis of the
potential effects of the existing project
and concludes that amending the
project license in accordance with the
Settlement as modified by staff would
not constitute a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment.

A copy of the EA is on file with the
Commission and is available for public
inspection at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room. The EA may
also be viewed on the Commission’s
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in
the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502–8659.
Any comments should be filed within
30 days from the issuance date of this
notice, and should be addressed to the
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 1–A, Washington, DC 20426.
Please affix ‘‘Lundy Hydroelectric
Project No. 1390’’ to all comments.
Comments may be filed electronically
via Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions
on the Commission’s Web site under the
‘‘eFiling’’ link. For further information,
contact John Smith at (202) 502–8972 or
by e-mail at john.smith@ferc.gov.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–8025 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. PF06–21–000]

Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Proposed
Guardian Expansion/Extension
Project, Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues, and Notice of
Public Scoping Meetings
May 19, 2006.

The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
that will address the environmental
impacts of the Guardian Expansion/
Extension Project (G–II) proposed by
Guardian Pipeline L.L.C (Guardian). The
Commission will use the EIS in its
decision-making process to determine
whether or not to authorize the project.
This notice explains the scoping process
the Commission will use to gather input
from the public and interested agencies
on the project. Your input will help us
determine the issues that need to be
evaluated in the EIS. Please note that
the scoping period will close on June
23, 2006.
Comments may be submitted in
written form or verbally. Further details
on how to submit written comments are
provided in the Public Participation
section of this notice. In lieu of sending
written comments, we invite you to
attend the public scoping meetings we
have scheduled as follows:

Date and time

Location

Monday, June 12, 2006 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. (CDT) ....................................

Radisson Hotel and Conference Center of Green Bay 2040 Airport
Drive Green Bay, WI US (920) 405–6404.
Ramada Plaza Hotel 1 North Main Street Fond Du Lac, WI 54935
(920) 923–3000.
Olympia Conference Center 1350 Royale Mile Road Oconomowoc, WI
53066 (262) 369–4969.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. (CDT) ...................................
Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. (CDT) .............................

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

30131

This notice is being sent to affected
landowners; Federal, state, and local
government agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest
groups; Native American tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries
and newspapers. We encourage
government representatives to notify
their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, you may be contacted by a
Guardian representative about the
acquisition of an easement to construct,
operate, and maintain the proposed

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

project facilities. The pipeline company
would seek to negotiate a mutually
acceptable agreement. However, if the
project is approved by the FERC, that
approval conveys with it the right of
eminent domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings in
accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility on My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Internet Web site (http://
www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses

PO 00000

Frm 00019

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

a number of typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
and how to participate in the FERC’s
proceedings.
Summary of the Proposed Project
Guardian proposes to construct, own,
operate, and maintain:
• Approximately 105.8 miles of new
natural gas pipeline; about 79.2 miles of
which consist of 30-inch-diameter
pipeline, and the remaining 26.6 miles
would consist of 20-inch-diameter
pipeline. The proposed pipeline would
originate at Ixonia in northeastern
Jefferson County, Wisconsin and travel

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1

30132

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

in a general north-northeast direction
through Dodge, Fond du Lac, Calumet,
Brown, and Outagamie Counties,
Wisconsin, terminating at a point just
west of Green Bay. The six proposed
meter stations would be located along
the proposed expansion route in
Jefferson, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Calumet,
Brown, and Outagamie Counties,
Wisconsin.
• One new 39,000-horsepower (hp)
compressor station near Sycamore
Illinois; the proposed compressor
station would be located along the
existing Guardian pipeline route in De
Kalb County, Illinois.
• One new 39,000-hp compressor
station in Walworth, Wisconsin. The
proposed compressor station would be
located along the proposed G-II pipeline
route in Walworth County, Wisconsin.
• Six new meter stations, and
associated pipeline facilities including
pig launcher/receivers and five mainline
valves.
Guardian states that the project would
provide about 537,200 decatherms per
day of additional natural gas capacity to
Guardian’s existing pipeline system.
Guardian indicates that the proposed
additional capacity would facilitate the
transport of natural gas to customers
within the state of Wisconsin and
provide those customers with the
necessary infrastructure to support
growth, choice, and competition within
the natural gas marketplace. Guardian
proposes to have the project constructed
and operational by November 2008.
The general location of the proposed
pipeline and associated facilities are
shown in the figure included as
Appendix 1.1
Nonjurisdictional Facilities
In addition to the facilities proposed
by Guardian, the proposed project has
associated facilities that do not come
under the jurisdiction of the
Commission. These related
‘‘nonjurisdictional’’ facilities include:
• The Wisconsin Public Service
Corporation (WPSC) proposes to
construct three lateral pipelines to
interconnect with the G-II pipeline
expansion segment and conduct
modifications to WPSC’s existing West

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

1 The appendices referenced in this notice are not

being printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all
appendices, other than Appendix 1 (maps), are
available on the Commission’s Web site at the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20426, or call (202) 502–8371. For instructions
on connecting to eLibrary refer to the Public
Participation section of this notice. Copies of the
appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail. Requests for detailed maps of the
proposed facilities should be made directly to
Guardian.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

Green Bay Line including a tie-in to an
existing WPSC 12-inch feeder pipeline
and the addition of flow controls. The
three proposed laterals include the
following:
—Sheboygan/Plymouth Lateral—
consisting of approximately 32 miles
of 16- and 12-inch-diameter pipeline.
—Chilton Lateral—consisting of
approximately 1 mile of 4-inchdiameter pipeline.
—Denmark Lateral—consisting of
approximately 14 miles of 12-inchdiameter pipeline.
• We-Energies proposes to construct
two lateral pipelines to interconnect
with the G-II pipeline expansion
segment. The proposed laterals include
the following:
—Hartford/West Bend Lateral—
consisting of approximately 12.7
miles of 8-inch-diameter pipeline.
—Fox Valley Lateral—consisting of
approximately 12.6 total miles of
20-, 16-, 12-, and 8-inch-diameter
pipeline.
• Commonwealth Editions Power
Company (ComEd) proposes to
construct approximately 2.4 miles of
transmission line to bring power from
an existing 138-kilovolt (kV) ComEd
transmission line to Guardian’s
proposed Sycamore Compressor Station
in De Kalb, Illinois.
• We-Energies proposes to construct
up to 2 miles of transmission line to
bring power from an existing 138-kV
We-Energies transmission line to
Guardian’s proposed Bluff Creek
Compressor Station in Walworth,
Wisconsin.
The WPSC and We-Energies laterals
and electric transmission line facilities
and the ComEd electric transmission
line facility will be under the
jurisdiction of the Wisconsin Public
Service Commission (WIPSC) and the
Illinois Commerce Commission,
respectively.We 2 have determined that
these nonjurisdictional facilities will be
discussed in the EIS. At this time, the
WIPSC and the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources have agreed to
participate as participating agencies in
the EIS process.
Land Requirements for Construction
As proposed, the typical construction
right-of-way for the project pipeline
would be between 80 to 110 feet wide.
An 80-foot right-of-way is proposed for
the 26.6 miles of 20-inch pipe and a
110-foot right-of-way is proposed for the
79.2 miles of 30-inch pipe. Following
2 ‘‘We,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the
environmental staff of the FERC’s Office of Energy
Projects.

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

construction, Guardian would retain a
50-foot-wide permanent right-of-way for
operation of the project. Additional,
temporary extra workspaces beyond the
typical construction right-of-way limits
would be required at certain feature
crossings (e.g., roads, railroads,
wetlands, or waterbodies), in areas with
steep side slopes, or in association with
special construction techniques.
Based on preliminary information,
construction of the proposed project
facilities would affect a total of about
1336.9 acres of land (including
construction right-of-ways and
aboveground facilities). This does not
include land that would be disturbed by
temporary work spaces and lay down
areas, which is still being determined.
Following construction, about 641.2
acres would be maintained as
permanent right-of-way, and about 23
acres of land would be maintained as
new aboveground facility sites. The
remaining 672.7 acres of temporary
construction rights-of-way and any
other additional areas required for extra
workspaces, pipe storage or contractor
yards would be restored and allowed to
revert to its former use.
The EIS Process
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to
take into account the environmental
impacts that could result from an action
when it considers whether or not an
interstate natural gas pipeline should be
approved. The FERC will use the EIS to
consider the environmental impact that
could result if Guardian’s G–II Project is
authorized under section 7 of the
Natural Gas Act. NEPA also requires us
to discover and address concerns the
public may have about proposals to be
considered by the Commission. This
process is referred to as ‘‘scoping.’’ The
main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EIS on the
important environmental issues. With
this Notice of Intent, the Commission
staff is requesting public comments on
the scope of the issues to be addressed
in the EIS. All comments received will
be considered during preparation of the
EIS.
Our independent analysis of the
issues will be included in a draft EIS.
We will also evaluate possible
alternatives to the proposed project or
portions of the project, and make
recommendations on how to lessen or
avoid impacts on affected resources.
The draft EIS will be mailed to
Federal, state, and local government
agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest
groups; Native American tribes; affected
landowners; commentors; other

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

interested parties; local libraries and
newspapers; and the FERC’s official
service list for this proceeding. A 45-day
comment period will be allotted for
review of the draft EIS. We will consider
all comments on the draft EIS and revise
the document, as necessary, before
issuing a final EIS. We will consider all
comments on the final EIS before we
make our recommendations to the
Commission. To ensure that your
comments are considered, please follow
the instructions in the Public
Participation section of this notice.
Although no formal application has
been filed, the FERC staff has already
initiated its NEPA review under its Prefiling Process. The purpose of the Prefiling Process is to encourage the early
involvement of interested stakeholders
and to identify and resolve issues before
an application is filed with the FERC.
With this notice, we are asking
Federal, state, and local governmental
agencies with jurisdiction and/or
special expertise with respect to
environmental issues, to express their
interest in becoming cooperating
agencies for the preparation of the EIS.
These agencies may choose to
participate once they have evaluated the
proposal relative to their
responsibilities. Agencies that would
like to request cooperating status should
follow the instructions for filing
comments provided below (see Public
Participation).
Currently Identified Environmental
Issues
The EIS will discuss impacts that
could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the
proposed project. We have already
identified several issues that we think
deserve attention based on a
preliminary review of the project site
and the facility information provided by
Guardian. This preliminary list of issues
may be changed based on your
comments and our analysis.
• Potential effects on prime farmland
soils and soils with a high potential for
compaction.
• Potential effects on waterbodies
designated under federal and/or state
programs.
• Evaluation of temporary and
permanent impacts on wetlands and
development of appropriate mitigation.
• Native American and tribal
concerns, including crossing of the
Oneida Nation Indian Reservation.
• Potential impacts to fish and
wildlife habitat, including waterbird
nesting areas along major river
crossings.
• Potential effect on federally and
state-listed species.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

• Potential impacts to existing land
uses, including agricultural, certified
organic farms, and managed forested
lands.
• Potential visual effects of the
aboveground facilities on surrounding
areas.
• Potential impacts and potential
benefits of construction workforce on
local housing, infrastructure, public
services, and economy.
• Potential impacts to local air and
noise quality associated with
construction and operation.
• Alternative alignments for the
pipeline route and alternative sites for
the compressor stations.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by
providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the
proposed project. By becoming a
commentor, your concerns will be
addressed in the EIS and considered by
the Commission. Your comments
should focus on the potential
environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives (including alternative
facility sites and pipeline routes), and
measures to avoid or lessen
environmental impact. The more
specific your comments, the more useful
they will be. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly
recorded, please carefully follow these
instructions:
• Send an original and two copies of
your letter to: Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First St., NE., Room
1A, Washington, DC 20426.
• Label one copy of your comments
for the attention of Gas Branch 1.
• Reference Docket No. PF06–21–000
on the original and both copies.
• Mail your comments so that they
will be received in Washington, DC on
or before June 23, 2006.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing of any comments in
response to this Notice of Intent. For
information on electronically filing
comments, please see the instructions
on the Commission’s Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link and the link to the User’s
Guide, as well as information in 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii). Before you can
submit comments you will need to
create a free account, which can be
created on-line.
The public scoping meetings (dates,
times, and locations are listed above) are
designed to provide another opportunity
to offer comments on the proposed
project. Interested groups and
individuals are encouraged to attend the
meetings and to present comments on

PO 00000

Frm 00021

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

30133

the environmental issues they believe
should be addressed in the EIS. A
transcript of each meeting will be
generated so that your comments will be
accurately recorded.
Once Guardian formally files its
application with the Commission, you
may want to become an official party to
the proceeding known as an
‘‘intervenor.’’ Intervenors play a more
formal role in the process and are able
to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be
heard by the courts if they choose to
appeal the Commission’s final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in a
Commission proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for
becoming an intervenor are included in
the User’s Guide under the ‘‘e-filing’’
link on the Commission’s Web site.
Please note that you may not request
intervenor status at this time. You must
wait until a formal application is filed
with the Commission.
Environmental Mailing List
An effort is being made to send this
notice to all individuals, organizations,
and government entities interested in
and/or potentially affected by the
proposed project. This includes all
landowners who are potential right-ofway grantors, whose property may be
used temporarily for project purposes,
or who own homes within distances
defined in the Commission’s regulations
of certain aboveground facilities.
If you received this notice, you are on
the environmental mailing list for this
project. If you do not want to send
comments at this time, but still want to
remain on our mailing list, please return
the Information Request (Appendix 2). If
you do not return the Information
Request, you will be removed from the
Commission’s environmental mailing
list.
Availability of Additional Information
Additional information about the
project is available from the
Commission’s Office of External Affairs,
at 1–866–208–FERC (3372) or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://
www.ferc.gov) using the ‘‘eLibrary link.’’
Click on the eLibrary link, select
‘‘General Search’’ and enter the project
docket number excluding the last three
digits (i.e., PF06–21) in the ‘‘Docket
Number’’ field. Be sure you have
selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at 1–866–208–3676, or TTY, contact
(202) 502–8659. The eLibrary link on
the FERC Internet Web site also
provides access to the texts of formal
documents issued by the Commission,

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1

30134

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

such as orders, notices, and rule
makings.
In addition, the FERC now offers a
free service called eSubscription that
allows you to keep track of all formal
issuances and submittals in specific
dockets. This can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings
by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document
summaries, and direct links to the
documents. To register for this service,
go to http://www.ferc.gov/
esubscribenow.htm.
Public meetings or site visits will be
posted on the Commission’s calendar
located at http://www.ferc.gov/
EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along
with other related information.
Finally, Guardian has established an
Internet website for this project at
http://www.guardianpipeline.com/. The
Web site includes a description of the
project, a map of the proposed pipeline
route, and answers to frequently asked
questions. You can also request
additional information or provide
comments directly to Guardian at 1–
866–608–7300 or
mjames@landservicecompany.com.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–8028 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP06–102–000]

Trunkline LNG Company, LLC; Notice
of Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Assessment for the Proposed
Infrastructure Enhancement Project
and Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

May 19, 2006.

The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of
the Infrastructure Enhancement Project
(IEP) involving construction and
operation of facilities by Trunkline LNG
Company, LLC’s (Trunkline LNG) in
Lake Charles, Calcasieu Parish,
Louisiana.1 Trunkline LNG would
construct and operate Ambient Air
Vaporization (AAV) facilities at its
existing liquefied natural gas import
terminal in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana.
1 Trunkline LNGs application was filed with the
Commission under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act
and Part 157 of the Commission’s regulations.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

These facilities would consist of system
that uses ambient heat in the air to
reduce the use of fuel gas in the
vaporization of liquefied natural gas
(LNG). Additionally, Trunkline LNG
would add natural gas liquids (NGL)
processing facilities for LNG
conditioning and British thermal unit
(Btu) control. This EA will be used by
the Commission in its decision-making
process to determine whether the
project is in the public convenience and
necessity.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, you may be contacted by a
pipeline company representative about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
proposed facilities. The pipeline
company would seek to negotiate a
mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if the project is approved by
the Commission, that approval conveys
with it the right of eminent domain.
Therefore, if easement negotiations fail
to produce an agreement, the pipeline
company could initiate condemnation
proceedings in accordance with state
law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility On My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ was attached to the project
notice Trunkline LNG provided to
landowners. This fact sheet addresses a
number of typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
and how to participate in the
Commission’s proceedings. It is
available for viewing on the FERC
Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).
Summary of the Proposed Project
Trunkline LNG’s IEP would provide
alternative vaporization using a
supplemental heat source to reduce the
fuel gas requirements for vaporization.
Reducing the amount of fuel gas
consumed for the vaporization process
allows more of the natural gas from the
LNG to be delivered to customers.
Trunkline LNG seeks authority to
construct and operate the following:
• 64 Potassium Formate (KF)-Air
heaters (64 forced convection, three-fan
air exchangers, 17.9 million Btu per
hour (MMBtu/hr)/Air Heater;
• Four KF–LNG Vaporizers (525
million standard cubic feet per day
[MMscf/d]);
• One NGL Recovery Unit, sized for
a maximum capacity of 1,050 MMscf/d;
• 1,160 feet of 12-inch-diameter
ethane product piping;
• 1,160 feet of 12-inch-diameter
propane product piping;
• Two propylene glycol heaters (150
MMBtu/hr each);

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

• Glycol storage and circulation
System;
• Two electrical switchgear buildings;
• One remote instrumentation
building, designed as Equipment Room
2; and
• Foam Building No. 4.
The nonjurisdictional facilities
include the expansion of the existing
electric substation, a meter station, and
the construction of two 18 mile-long
(each) take away NGL product
pipelines. British Gas (BG) has
contracted PetoLogistics, LLC to design,
permit, and operate the meter station
and take away pipelines. The pipelines
would consist of a 10-inch-diameter
ethane (approximately 1,800 gallons per
minute [gpm]) pipeline and a 6-inchdiameter propane (approximately 1,250
gpm) pipeline. The pipelines would be
constructed from the meter station to
PetroLogistics’ storage facility in Sulfur,
Louisiana.
The location of the project facilities is
shown in Appendix 1.2
Land Requirements for Construction
Construction of the proposed facilities
would require about 33.1 acres of land
of which 20 acres are currently covered
with grass. Following construction,
about 13.6 acres of the 20 acres would
be returned to grass and 6.4 acres would
be covered with asphalt, concrete or
gravel. Included in the 33.1 acres is
approximately 0.6 acre of land that
would be temporarily affected by the
construction of the NGL product
pipeline and nonjurisdictional meter
station.
In addition, a nonjurisdictional 0.5
acre electric-power substation
expansion site developed and operated
by Entergy would remain gravel covered
with concrete equipment foundations
for the new electrical equipment.
Further, the 18-mile-long
nonjurisdictional take away NGL
products pipelines would require about
130.9 acres of land during construction
and 87.3 acres as permanent right-ofway based on a 60-foot-wide
construction right-of-way and a 40-footwide permanent right-of-way.
The EA Process
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to
take into account the environmental
2 The appendices referenced in this notice are not
being printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all
appendices, other than Appendix 1 (maps), are
available on the Commission’s Web site at the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20426, or call (202) 502–8371. For instructions
on connecting to eLibrary refer to the last page of
this notice. Copies of the appendices were sent to
all those receiving this notice in the mail.

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/documents/agency%3Aferc%3A0297b5fb6eb990d9. Public record. Not legal advice.