# Theodore Alexander McKee

> Federal judicial disclosures.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/disclosures/544

## Record

- **Judge:** Theodore Alexander McKee
- **Year:** 2003
- **Pages:** 15

## Text

MOBILITY ELECTRONICS ING — BUY
MOBILITY ELECTRONICS INC — Buy
MOBILITY ELECTRONICS — BLY
NETEASE.COMI ING — BUY
SSGA TUCKERMAN REIT FUND — Int/Div — woy
TELEFON DE MEXICO — Distribution
WHOLE FOODS — BUY
WHOLE FOODS — SELL
STAPLES — Int/Div
DRESHNER RCM BIOTECH MUTUAL FUND — Int/Div
CITIZENS CORE GROWTH FUND (SEE SECT vin — Int/Div
ON JULY 2, 2002, I SOLD ALL THE SHARES | THEN OWNED OF INTEL STOCK. THE VALUE OF THE SALE WAS CODE “T* AND THE GAIN

WAS CODE "A." IN COMPLETING THIS REPORT I DISCOVERED THAT SALE WAS OMITTED FROM THE 2002 REPORT EVEN AS

AMENDED ON NOVEMBER 19, 2003. PLEASE ACCEPT THIS AS AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2002 DISCLOSURES

EXPLANATION OF MERK, INTEL, AND COCA COLA

I WOULD LIKE TO ADD A CLARIFICATION FOR MY INTERESTS IN INTEL, MERCK, AND COCA COLA. I SOLD ALL SHARES OF coca

COLA ON MARCH 3, 1999 FOR VALUE CODE "I" AND A GAIN OF "A." TSOLD ALL SHARES OF MERCK AS-REPORTED ON MY 2002

DISCLOSURE FORM ON JULY 2, 2002. HOWEVER IN THE CASE OF MERCK, INTEL AND COCA COLA, IPLACED COMPUTER ORDERS TO

SELL THE NUMBER OF SHARES 1 OWNED AT THE TIME OF THE ORDER IN THE CASE QF MERCK, INTEL AND COCA COLA. HOWEVER,

BETWEEN THE TIME THE ORDER WAS EXECUTED, AND THE TIME I PLACED IT, FRACTIONAL SHARES FOR EACH WERE DEPOSITED

TO MY ACCOUNT. THIS HAS RESULTED IN DIVIDENDS BEING PAID EACH QUARTER SINCE THE DATE OF THE SALE, AND THIS IS THE

REASON THAT I AM SHOWING DIVIDENDS IN THIS REPORT FOR MERCK, INTEL, AND COCA COLA EVEN THOUGH MY POSITION WAS

PREVIOUSLY SOLD. THE DIVIDENDS QUITE LITERALLY AMOUNT TO "PENNIES" AS THEY WERE PAID ON LESS THAN A WHOLE

SHARE AND THEREFY FALL INTO VALUE CODE "J" AND THE VALUE AT THE END OF THE APPLICABLE RERPORTING PERIODS

WOULD ALSO BE "1." IHAVE TRIED TO SELL THESE FRACTIONAL SHARES SIMPLY TO SIMPLIFY THIS REPORT BUT I CANNOT

EXECUTE A SALE FOR LESS THAN ONE SHARE. IN ADDITION, DOING SO WOULD TRIGGER A COMMISSION THAT WOULD EXCEED

THE "GAIN" FROM THE SALE. ACCORDINGLY, THESE FRACTIONAL SHARES REMAIN IN MY ACCOUNT AND CONTINUE TO GENERATE

DIVIDENDS THAT ARE MORE "NUISANCE" THAN "GAIN." HOWEVER, FOR WHATEVER VALUE IT MAY HAVE, PLEASE NOTE THAT

LAST YEAR DIVIDENDS IN THE AMOUNT OF A PENNY, EIGHT CENTS AND 20 CENTS DRIPPED INTO MY ACCOUNT EACH QUARTER

LAST YEAR FROM THESE FRACTIONAL SHARES

a

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/disclosures/544. Public record. Not legal advice.
