# Joan B. Gottschall

> Federal judicial disclosures.

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/disclosures/25781

## Record

- **Judge:** Joan B. Gottschall
- **Year:** 2003
- **Pages:** 10

## Text

Vanguard Wellington Fund — Int/Div
Vanguard Wellesley Fund — Int/Div
Vanguard Index Trust — Int/Div
Vanguard Prime Portfolio — Int/Div
Van Kampen Emerging Growth Fund — Int/Div
Eaton Vance Muni Bond Fund — Int/Div
US Treasury Strip (11-15- 9) — None
Fed Empl Credit Union Accts — Interest
IBM common stock — Int/Div
ML Global Bond Focus Fund (name now is ML Core Bond Fnd' — Int/Div — Sell
Pimco Total Retum Fund — Int/Div — Buy
Sr.Hi Inc Port. — Int/Div
Viacom c/stock Class A — Int/Div
Viacom c/stock Class B — Int/Div
Mercury HW Intern Value Fnd — Int/Div — Sell
Alliance Premier Growth Fund — None — Sold
Munder Net Net Fund — None
AOL Time Wamer c/stock (now Time Wamer c/stock) — None — change: Time Wamer
Intel cfstock — Int/Div
Waste Management c/stock — Int/Div
Vanguard Tax-Managed Growth & Income Fund — Int/Div
Flextronics c/stock — None
Hewlett-Packard c/stock — Int/Div
ETrade Tx-Ex Money Market Fund — Int/Div — Sell
ADVP c/stock — None
Dycom c/stock — None
MVSN c/stock — None
Seligman Tef Nat! Tax Ex Ser — Int/Div — Sell
MFS Mid-Cap Growth Fund B — None
Putnam New Value Fund — Int/Div
MEFS Utilities Fund — Int/Div
MEFS Govt Securities Fund — Int/Div
MEFS Value Fund B — Int/Div
MEFS Large Cap Growth — None
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund — Int/Div
Fund — Int/Div — more
Stanley (MS) US Govt Sec. Fund — Int/Div — Buy — overlooked '02
Member, Visiting Committee #0 the Divinity School, University of Chicago
Member, Board of Directors, Nlinois Humanities Council
Member, Board of Directors, Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School
Gift — Union League Club of Chicago — Reduced annual dues for judges
Income — See Section VIII, note 1 — AR Bg NALICA SUN == 8), po 0.00
BABA h WAM HIN

Bw Th

nn we

844 KING STREET

Juoax R. LANIER Axsersox, {if

WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801

TRLZFHONE

dusag Janu BF, PullaM

dupa Francs 8. Sites, Ju,

COM: 303) B73-4158

MasieTnATE HENnay L Jone Ja.

-

rESLs aT ee

FiBL 487-C188

Juoue Jauw 8. Joues

Jusar Hatnawer Ri. Jouss

outber 23, 1991

A. TOWNSEND ROBINION

ducer flosear C, Jeuse

FTE: €32-8207

CounNstL

Judat deurv A. Pours

Jusas Davis Bam

Juser Jaseru LL. Tavae

Jusat Rosear M. Tazasue:

Juosst PaThiciA HM, Ward

ducer Minan H. Ware

Juscat Jaugs 8. Saeki

JUDO WaLTer K. STarLETON

Craranan

The uonorable Joan B. CGotts~hall

United States District Court

219 South Dearborn ‘Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Re: Docket No. 828

Dear Judge Gottschall:

In 1986, 1%87, and 1688 you, along with your

edited and proofread a manuscript on a non-legal subject written by

your

The manuscript was published as a book by your

$Y The book is selling well enough to produce income for its

publisher, author, and editors.

Your GIES vho reside in Canada

have proposed formation of a partnership under Canadian laws whose

assets will be all the rights to the book.

The partners will be

your

and you.

After the partnership is

formed, it will, in turn, be dissolved and the assets transferred

to. a Canadian corporation whose shareholders will be the partners

of the dissolved partnership.

After the partnership is formed,

your sole rcle will be to serve as a shareholder.

As a sharehold-

er, you will share in proceeds arising from the sales of the book

and the use of the rights to the book.

You ask whether you may

participate in this arzz2

ae

bold

cnent without €rancgressing either the

Code of Conduct for United States Judges or the Ethics Reform Act

.

.

of 1989.

The reoeipt off incons from writing or editing a book is

permitted under the Code of Conduct.

Canon 5A says, "A judge may

write

LI BE J

on non-legal subjects.¥

The Committee believes that

editing and proofreading are activities covered by the word

"writing."

And the Committee has approved, at least implicitly,

the receipt of income from writing.

Advisory Opinion No.

55.

There are restrictions on the manner in which a judge's name may ba

used in the promotion of a book, but, we assume, these restrictions

are not likely to be involved in your case since you are not the

author and your name.is unlikely to be used in connection with

selling cf the book.

Nor is there anything about the nature of the

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/disclosures/25781. Public record. Not legal advice.
