# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 30, 1999

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/998343

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 30, 1999
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/998343

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7589

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP G. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, District
Judge. (CA-98-39-3)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Phillip Brown appeals from the district court’s order denying

relief on his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994).

Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, No.

CA-98-39-3 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 13, 1998). See also Pelissero v.

Thompson, ___ F.3d ___, No. 97-6156 (4th Cir. Mar. 12, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/998343. Public record. Not legal advice.