# Kittle Property Group, Inc. v. the City of Texas City, the City Commission of Texas City, the Texas City Engineering and Planning Department, and the Planning Board of Texas City

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · May 14, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9971816

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** May 14, 2024
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9971816

## Opinion text

Opinion issued May 14, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-24-00121-CV
———————————
KITTLE PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Appellant
V.
THE CITY OF TEXAS CITY, THE CITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS
CITY, THE TEXAS CITY ENGINEERING AND PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF TEXAS CITY,
Appellees

On Appeal from the 405th District Court
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 23-CV-1616

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kittle Property Group, Inc., filed a notice of appeal from the trial

court’s January 25, 2024 order sustaining the plea to the jurisdiction filed by

appellees, The City of Texas City, The City Commission of Texas City, The Texas
City Engineering and Planning Department, and The Planning Board of Texas City

(collectively, “appellees”). On April 25, 2024, appellant filed a motion to dismiss

its appeal, stating that appellant “no longer desire[d] to pursue its appeal and hereby

s[ought] to voluntarily dismiss the appeal.”

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of

conference, but states that appellees do not oppose the relief requested in the motion.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9971816. Public record. Not legal advice.