# Sherman Brown v. Bernard Booker

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 11, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9959944

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 11, 2024
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9959944

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6522 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/11/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6522

SHERMAN BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BERNARD W. BOOKER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:16-cv-00576-EKD-JCH)

Submitted: January 29, 2024 Decided: April 11, 2024

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald P. Salzman, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6522 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/11/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Sherman Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 petition and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims

debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of

the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made

the requisite showing. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

*
Brown failed to challenge on appeal the district court’s independent determination
that his fiber analysis due process claim was barred by the one-year limitations period in
28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Thus, he forfeited appellate review of that portion of the district
court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9959944. Public record. Not legal advice.