# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 14, 1998

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/995904

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 14, 1998
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/995904

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GERARD VALMORE BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-93-281, CA-97-938-6-20AK)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 14, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerard Valmore Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998),

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommenda-

tion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Brown, Nos. CR-93-281; CA-97-938-6-20AK (D.S.C. July 18, 1997 & Aug

6, 1997); see Rule 9(a), Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/995904. Public record. Not legal advice.