# United States v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · April 4, 2024

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9957652

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 4, 2024
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9957652

## Opinion text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-949
D.C. No. 1:22-cr-00103-SPW-1
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MARKEL DEAN BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Markel Dean Brown appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction

for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, possession with intent to

distribute, and distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

Brown contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because it

does not sufficiently account for his mitigating factors, including his age, mental

health issues, and difficult background. The record reflects that the district court

acknowledged Brown’s mitigating factors and imposed the below-Guidelines

sentence to account for them. The court did not abuse its discretion by declining to

impose an even lower sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007);

United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The

weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the

district court.”). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Brown’s criminal

history and the seriousness of his offense. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED.

2 23-949

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9957652. Public record. Not legal advice.