# Enders v. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 29, 1998

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994838

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 29, 1998
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994838

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6839

MATTHEW DAVID ENDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY BROWN, Officer; THE BALTIMORE COUNTY PO-
LICE DEPARTMENT PRECINCT 12-DUNDALK LOCATED AT
THE INTERSECTION OF MERRIT BLVD & WISE AVENUE;
GARY DAVIS, Officer; MICHAEL DEPAULA, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-
3868-AMD)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 29, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew David Enders, Appellant Pro Se. John Edward Beverungen,
COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Towson, Maryland; Jeffrey Grant Cook,
BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Enders v. Brown, No. CA-96-3868-AMD (D. Md. May 27, 1997).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994838. Public record. Not legal advice.
