# Savage v. Board of Trustees

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 6, 1998

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994686

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 6, 1998
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994686

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1329

REGINALD SAVAGE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

NANCY PAIGE SMITH,

Plaintiff,

versus

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, St. Mary's College of
Maryland; MICHAEL BERGER, Division of Head of
Human Development, St. Mary's College of Mary-
land; MELVIN ENDY, Provost; EDWARD LEWIS,
President; ALLAN PASKOW,

Defendants - Appellees,

JOHN UNDERWOOD; KENNETH HOLMES,

Movants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
92-3646-DKC)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 6, 1998
Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Savage, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Ann Griisser, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order entering judgment
for his employer on his claims of retaliatory and constructive

discharge. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Savage v. Board of Trustees,
No. CA-92-3646-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994686. Public record. Not legal advice.