# Brown v. IRS

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 28, 1998

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994073

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 28, 1998
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994073

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2075

CALVIN EARL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-97-68-4-H)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Brown v. IRS, No. CA-97-68-4-H
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for "Service of

Civil Contempt" and dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/994073. Public record. Not legal advice.