# Higgins v. Higgins

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · June 2, 2006 · 952 So. 2d 1144

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9938549

## Case

- **Full name:** Denise D. Higgins v. Ronnie Lynn Higgins. Denise D. Higgins v. Ronnie Lynn Higgins.
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 2, 2006
- **Citations:** 952 So. 2d 1144; 2006 WL 1529698
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Murdock
- **Judges:** Bryan, Crawley, Murdock
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9938549

## Opinion text

It is with much reluctance that I concur in the result reached by the main opinion. It is my hope that our Supreme Court will take the opportunity, if one is presented to it, either to address anew the adequacy under Rule 59.1, Ala. R. Civ. P., of extension language of the nature utilized by the trial court in this case or at least to address the correctness of this court's conclusion today that the specific language used by the trial court in this case was inadequate to satisfy the requirements for extending the 90-day period for ruling on postjudgment motions under that rule. *Page 1149

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9938549. Public record. Not legal advice.