# Selma Medical Center, Inc. v. Manayan

> Supreme Court of Alabama · April 23, 1999 · 733 So. 2d 382

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9937868

## Case

- **Full name:** Selma Medical Center, Inc., D/B/A Columbia Four Rivers Medical Center v. Conrad C. Manayan, D.O.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** April 23, 1999
- **Citations:** 733 So. 2d 382; 1999 WL 236630
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Maddox
- **Judges:** Cook, Maddox
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9937868

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that arbitration clause covering any dispute ‘concerning any aspect of agreement between doctor and hospital required arbitration , of fraudulent-inducement claim
- holding that arbitration clause covering any dispute “concerning any aspect of’ agreement between doctor and hospital required arbitration of fraudulent-inducement claim

## Opinion text

I write briefly to point out that I did not join the majority opinion in Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Lanier, 644 So.2d 1258
(Ala. 1994). I wrote specially in that case to express my belief that in the context of arbitration agreements the narrow interpretation of the phrase "arising out of" that the majority adopted in Lanier was inconsistent with the express federal policy in favor of arbitration. See Lanier, 644 So.2d 1263 -65 (Maddox, J., concurring in *Page 387
the result in part and dissenting in part). I continue to hold that belief.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9937868. Public record. Not legal advice.