# Department of Indus. Relations v. Nix

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · March 19, 1980 · 381 So. 2d 651

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9937582

## Case

- **Full name:** Department of Industrial Relations, Westala Coal Company v. Louis Nix, Norman Murray.
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** March 19, 1980
- **Citations:** 381 So. 2d 651
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Holmes
- **Judges:** Bradley, Holmes
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9937582

## Opinion text

I concur specially.
The testimony in this case reveals, in addition to those facts as stated in the majority opinion, that the claimants are ready, willing, and able to return to work upon the execution of a new collective bargaining agreement. The testimony also reveals that the employer is ready to resume operation upon the execution of an agreement. *Page 654
These facts, to me, therefore establish that there is in fact a labor dispute existing between the parties. However, the pertinent statute, § 25-4-78 , Code of Ala. 1975, requires that the labor dispute be in active progress.
"Active" has been defined as "expressing action as distinct from mere existence or state. . . ." Webster's Third New International Dictionary. In this instance, with the above definition in mind, I find there is evidence to support the trial court's conclusion that there did not exist such a labor dispute in active progress so as to disqualify the claimant.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9937582. Public record. Not legal advice.