# Smitherman v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · May 7, 1993 · 627 So. 2d 1116

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9936445

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert Donald Smitherman v. State.
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** May 7, 1993
- **Citations:** 627 So. 2d 1116; 1993 WL 143827
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Taylor
- **Judges:** Montiel, Taylor
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9936445

## Opinion text

I concur with the majority in its result in Part II of this opinion. However, by no stretch of the imagination can the comment by the trial court in response to the prosecutor's remarks be called curative.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9936445. Public record. Not legal advice.