# Wild v. Wild

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · April 28, 2006 · 940 So. 2d 1037

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9936229

## Case

- **Full name:** Carol Wild v. John Irving Wild.
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** April 28, 2006
- **Citations:** 940 So. 2d 1037; 2006 WL 1120653
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Pittman
- **Judges:** Bryan, Crawley, Pittman
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9936229

## Opinion text

"It is well established that an appellate court will not consider an argument raised for the first time on appeal; its review is limited to evidence and arguments considered by the trial court." Stephens v. Stephens , 699 So.2d 194 , 196
(Ala.Civ.App. 1997). The record does not reveal that the wife asserted in the trial court, either before the entry of its final judgment or in a postjudgment motion, that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution mandated a hearing before a guardian ad litem could be appointed for her. Accordingly, I must dissent from reversing the trial court's judgment based upon that issue.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9936229. Public record. Not legal advice.