# Parrish v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc.

> Supreme Court of Alabama · May 30, 2003 · 868 So. 2d 406

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9935151

## Case

- **Full name:** A.L. Parrish v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** May 30, 2003
- **Citations:** 868 So. 2d 406; 2003 Ala. LEXIS 168; 2003 WL 21246573
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Johnstone
- **Judges:** Houston, Johnstone, Lyons, Rationale
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9935151

## Opinion text

I concur fully in the rationale and judgment affirming the summary judgment. But for one exception, I also concur in the rationale and judgment affirming the decertification of the class. The exception is that I do not agree with the main opinion insofar as it finds persuasive that part of the rationale of the trial court, quoted in the main opinion, to the effect that the defendants' counterclaims against some defaulting class members "would create the result that individual proof of claims would predominate over class claims and destroy the manageability of the class." *Page 417

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/9935151. Public record. Not legal advice.